Online Encyclopedia

Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.

DOMESDAY BOOK

Online Encyclopedia
Originally appearing in Volume V08, Page 399 of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica.
Spread the word: del.icio.us del.icio.us it!

DOMESDAY See also:

BOOK , or simply DOMESDAY, the See also:record of the See also:great survey of See also:England executed for See also:William the Conqueror. We learn from the See also:English See also:Chronicle that the See also:scheme of thissurvey. was discussed and determined in the See also:Christmas See also:assembly of 1085, and from the See also:colophon of Domesday Book that the survey (descriptio) was completed in io86. But Domesday Book (See also:liber) although compiled from the returns of that survey, must be carefully distinguished from them; nor is it certain that it was compiled in the See also:year in which the survey was made. For the making of the survey each See also:county was visited by a See also:group of royal See also:officers (legati), who held a public inquiry, probably in the great assembly known as the county See also:court, which was attended by representatives of every township as well as of the See also:local lords. The unit of inquiry was the See also:Hundred (a subdivision of the county which had then an administrative entity), and the return for each Hundred was sworn to by twelve local jurors, See also:half of then) English and half See also:Normans. What is believed to be a full transcript of these See also:original returns is preserved for several of the See also:Cambridgeshire Hundreds, and is of great illustrative importance. The Inquisitio Eliensis, the "Exon Domesday" (so called from the preservation of the See also:volume at See also:Exeter), and the second volume of Domesday Book, also all contain the full details which the original returns supplied. The original MS. of Domesday Book consists of two volumes, of which the second is devoted to the three eastern counties, while the first, which is of much larger See also:size, comprises the See also:rest of England except the most northerly counties. Of these the See also:north-See also:westerly portion, which had See also:Carlisle for its See also:head, was not conquered till some years after the survey was made; but the omission of See also:Northumberland and See also:Durham has not been satisfactorily explained. There are also no surveys of See also:London, See also:Winchester and some other towns. For both volumes the contents of the returns were entirely rearranged and classified according to fiefs. Instead of appearing under the Hundreds and townships they now appeared under the names of the local " barons," i.e. those who held the lands directly of the See also:crown in See also:fee.

In each county the See also:

list opened with the holding of the See also:king himself (which had possibly formed the subject of See also:separate inquiry); then came those of the churchmen and religious houses; next were entered those of the See also:lay tenants-in-See also:chief (barones); and last of all those of See also:women, of the king's serjeants (servientes), of the few English " thegns " who retained See also:land, and so forth. In some counties one or more See also:principal towns formed the subject of a separate See also:section; in some the clamores (disputed titles to land) were similarly treated apart. But this description applies more specially to the larger and principal volume; in the smaller one the See also:system is more confused, the See also:execution less perfect. The two volumes are distinguished even more sharply by the exclusion, in the larger one, of certain details, such as the enumeration of the live stock, which would have added greatly to its size. It has, indeed, been suggested that the eastern counties' volume represents a first See also:attempt, and that it was fQund impossible, or at least inconvenient, to See also:complete the See also:work on the same See also:scale. For the See also:object of the survey we have three See also:sources of See also:information: (1) the passage in the English Chronicle, which tells us why it was ordered, (2) the list, of questions which the jurors were asked, as preserved in the Inquisitio Eliensis, (3) the contents of Domesday Book and the allied records mentioned above. Although these can by no means be reconciled in every detail, it is now generally recognized that the See also:primary object of the survey was to acertain and record the fiscal rights of the king. These were mainly (1) the See also:national land-tax (geldum), paid on a fixed See also:assessment, (2) certain See also:miscellaneous dues, (3) the proceeds of the crown lands. After a great See also:political convulsion such as the See also:Norman See also:conquest, and the wholesale See also:confiscation of landed estates which followed it, it was William's See also:interest to make sure that the rights of the crown, which he claimed to have inherited, had not suffered in the See also:process. More especially was this the See also:case as his Norman followers were disposed to evade the liabilities of their English predecessors. The Domesday survey therefore recorded the names of the new holders of lands and the assessments on which their tax was to be paid. But it did more than this; by the king's instructions it endeavoured to make a national valuation list, estimating the See also:annual value of all the land in the See also:country, (1) at the See also:time of King See also:Edward's See also:death, (2) when the new owners received it, (3) at the time of the survey, and further, it reckoned, by command, the potential value as well.

It is evident that William desired to know the See also:

financial resources of his See also:kingdom, and probable that he wished to compare them with the existing assessment, which was one of considerable antiquity, though there are traces that it had been occasionally modified. The great bulk of Domesday Book is devoted to the somewhat arid details of the assessment and valuation of rural estates, which were as yet the only important source of national See also:wealth. After stating the assessment of the See also:manor, the record sets forth the amount of arable land, and the number of plough-teams (each reckoned at eight oxen) available for working it, with the additional number (if any) that might be employed; then the See also:river-meadows, woodland, pasture, See also:fisheries (i.e. weirs in the streams), See also:water-See also:mills, saltpans (if by the See also:sea) and other subsidiary sources of See also:revenue; the peasants are enumerated in their several classes; and finally the annual value of the whole, past and See also:present, is roughly estimated. It is obvious that,. both in its values and in its measurements, the survey's reckoning is very crude. Apart from the wholly rural portions, which constitute its bulk, Domesday contains entries of interest concerning most of the towns, which were probably made because of their bearing on the fiscal rights of the crown therein. These include fragments of custumals, records of the military service due, of markets, mints, and so forth. From the towns, from the counties as wholes, and from many of its See also:ancient lordships, the crown was entitled to archaic dues in See also:kind, such as See also:honey. The information of most See also:general interest found in the great record is that on political, See also:personal, ecclesiastical and social See also:history, which only occurs sporadically and, as it were, by See also:accident. Much of this was used by E. A. See also:Freeman for his work on the Norman Conquest. Although unique in See also:character and of priceless value to the student, Domesday will be found disappointing and largely unintelligible to any but the specialist.

Even scholars are unable to explain portions of its See also:

language and of its system. This is partly due to its very See also:early date, which has placed between it and later records a gulf that is hard to See also:bridge. But in the Dialogus de scaccario (temp. See also:Hen. II.) it is spoken of as a record from the arbitrament of which there was no See also:appeal (from which its popular name of " Domesday " is said to be derived). In the See also:middle ages its See also:evidence was frequently invoked in the See also:law-courts; and even now there are certain cases in which appeal is made to its testimony. To the topographer, as to the genealogist, its evidence is of primary importance; for it not only contains the earliest survey of a township or manor, but affords in the See also:majority of cases the See also:clue to its subsequent descent. The rearrangement, on a feudal basis, of the original returns (as described above) enabled the Conqueror and his officers to see with ease the extent of a See also:baron's possessions; but it also had the effect of showing how far he had enfeoffed " under-tenants," and who those under-tenants were. This was of great importance to William, not only for military reasons, but also because of his See also:firm resolve to make the under-tenants (though the " men " of their lords) swear See also:allegiance directly to himself. As Domesday normally records only the See also:Christian name of an under-See also:tenant, it is vain to seek for the surnames of families claiming a Norman origin; but much has been and is still being done to identify the under-tenants, the great bulk of whom See also:bear See also:foreign names. Domesday Book was originally preserved in the royal See also:treasury at Winchester (the Norman See also:kings' See also:capital), whence it speaks of itself (in one later addition) as Liber de Wintonia. When the treasury was removed to See also:Westminster (probably under See also:Henry II.) the book went with it.

Here it remained until the days of See also:

Queen See also:Victoria, being preserved from 1696 onwards in the See also:Chapter See also:House, and only removed in See also:special circumstances, as when it was sent to See also:Southampton for photozincographic See also:reproduction. It was eventually placed in the Public Record See also:Office, London, where it can be seen in a See also:glass case in the museum. In 1869 it received a See also:modern binding. The ancient Domes-See also:day See also:chest, in which it used to be kept, is also preserved in the See also:building. The See also:printing of Domesday, in " record type," was begun by See also:government in 1773, and the book was published, in two volumes fol. in 1783; in 1811 a volume of indexes was added, and in 1816 a supplementary volume, separately indexed, containing (I) the " Exon Domesday " (for the See also:south-western counties), (2) the Inquisitio Eliensis,.(3) the Liber Winton, (surveys of Winchester early in the 12th See also:century), and (4) the Boldon Book—a survey of the bishopric of Durham a century later than Domesday. Photo-graphic facsimiles of Domesday Book, for each county separately, were published in 1861-1863, also by government.

End of Article: DOMESDAY BOOK

Additional information and Comments

There are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click, and select "copy." Then paste it into your website, email, or other HTML.
Site content, images, and layout Copyright © 2006 - Net Industries, worldwide.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.

Links to articles and home page are always encouraged.

[back]
DOMENICHINO (or DOMENICO), ZAMPIERI (1581-1641)
[next]
DOMESTIC RELATIONS