Online Encyclopedia

Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.

HEIDELBERG CATECHISM, THE

Online Encyclopedia
Originally appearing in Volume V13, Page 211 of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica.
Spread the word: del.icio.us del.icio.us it!

See also:

HEIDELBERG See also:CATECHISM, THE , the most attractive of all the catechisms of the See also:Reformation, was See also:drawn up at the bidding of See also:Frederick III., elector of the See also:Palatinate, and published on Tuesday the loth of See also:January 1563. The new See also:religion in the Palatinate had been largely under the guidance of See also:Philip See also:Melanchthon, who had revived the old university of Heidelberg and staffed it with sympathetic teachers. One of these,Tillemann, Heshusius, who became See also:general See also:superintendent in 1558, held extreme Lutheran views on the Real Presence, and in his See also:desire to force the community into his own position excommunicated his colleague Klebitz, who held Zwinglian views. When the See also:breach was widening Frederick, " der fromme Kurfurst," came to the See also:succession, dismissed the two See also:chief combatants and referred the trouble to Melanchthon, whose guarded See also:verdict was distinctly Swiss rather than Lutheran. In a See also:decree of See also:August I 56o the elector declared for See also:Calvin and See also:Zwingli, and soon after he resolved to issue a new and unambiguous catechism of the evangelical faith. He entrusted the task to two See also:young men who have won deserved remembrance by their learning and their See also:character alike. See also:Zacharias See also:Ursinus was See also:born at See also:Breslau in See also:July 1534 and attained high See also:honour in the university of See also:Wittenberg. In 1558 he was made See also:rector of the gymnasium in his native See also:town, but the incessant strife with the extreme See also:Lutherans drove him to See also:Zurich, whence Frederick, on the See also:advice of See also:Peter See also:Martyr, summoned him to be See also:professor of See also:theology at Heidelberg and superintendent of the Sapientiae Collegium. He was a See also:man of modest and See also:gentle spirit, not endowed with See also:great See also:preaching gifts, but unwearied in study and consummately able to impart his learning to others. Deposed from his See also:chair by the elector See also:Louis in 1576, he lived with See also:John Casimir at See also:Neustadt and found a congenial See also:sphere in the new See also:seminary there, dying in his 49th See also:year, in See also:March 1583. Caspar Olevianus was born at Treves in 1536. He gave up See also:law for theology, studied under Calvin in See also:Geneva, Peter Martyr in Zurich, and See also:Beza in See also:Lausanne.

Urged by See also:

William See also:Farel he preached the new faith in his native See also:city, and when banished therefrom found a See also:home with Frederick of Heidelberg, where he gained high renown as preacher and See also:administrator. His ardour and See also:enthusiasm made him • the happy See also:complement of Ursinus. When the reaction came under Louis he was befriended by See also:Ludwig von Sain, See also:prince of See also:Wittgenstein, and John, See also:count of See also:Nassau, in 1vhose city of Herborn he did notable See also:work at the high school until his See also:death on the 15th of March 1587. The elector could have chosen no better men, young as they were, for the task in See also:hand. As a first step each See also:drew up a catechism of his own See also:composition, that of Ursinus being naturally of a more See also:grave and See also:academic turn than the freer See also:production of Olevianus, while each made full use of the earlier catechisms already in use. But when the See also:union was effected it was found that the See also:spirits of the two authors were most happily and harmoniously wedded, the exactness and erudition of the one being blended with the fervency and See also:grace of the other. Thus the Heidelberg Catechism, which was completed within a year of its inception, has an individuality that marks it out from all its predecessors and successors. The Heidelberg See also:synod unanimously approved of it,it was published in January 1563, and in the same year officially turned into Latin by Jos. Lagus and See also:Lambert Pithopoeus. The ultra-Lutherans attacked the catechism with great bitterness, the See also:assault being led by Heshusius and See also:Flacius Illyricus. See also:Maximilian II. remonstrated against it as an infringement of the See also:peace of See also:Augsburg. A See also:conference was held at Maulbronn in See also:April 1564, and a See also:personal attack was made on the elector at the See also:diet of Augsburg in 1566, but the See also:defence was well sustained, and the Heidelberg See also:book rapidly passed beyond the See also:bounds of the Palatinate (where indeed it suffered See also:eclipse from 1576 to 1583, during the electorate of Louis), and gained an abundant Success not only in See also:Germany (See also:Hesse, See also:Anhalt, See also:Brandenburg and See also:Bremen) but also in the See also:Netherlands (1588), and in the Reformed churches of See also:Hungary, Transylvania and See also:Poland.

It was officially recognized by the synod of See also:

Dort in 1619, passed into See also:France, See also:Britain and See also:America, and probably shares with the De imitatione Christi and The See also:Pilgrim's Progress the honour of coming next to the See also:Bible in the number of See also:tongues into which it has been translated. This wide See also:acceptance and high esteem are due largely to an avoidance of polemical and controversial subjects, and even more to an See also:absence of the controversial spirit. There is no See also:mistake about its Protestantism, even when we omit the unhappy addition made to See also:answer 8o by Frederick himself (in indignant reply to the See also:ban pronounced by the See also:Council of See also:Trent), in which the See also:Mass is described as " nothing else than a denial of the one See also:sacrifice and See also:passion of Jesus See also:Christ, and an accursed See also:idolatry "—an addition which is the one blot on the irrleirceta of the catechism. The work is the product of the best qualities of See also:head and See also:heart, and its See also:prose is frequently marked by all the beauty of a lyric. It follows the See also:plan of the See also:epistle to the See also:Romans (excepting chapters ix.-xt.) and falls into three parts: See also:Sin, Redemption and the New See also:Life. This arrangement alone would See also:mark it out from the normal reformation catechism, which runs along the stereotyped lines of See also:Decalogue, Creed, See also:Lord's See also:Prayer See also:Church and Sacraments. These themes are included, but are shown as organically related. The Commandments, e.g. " belong to the first See also:part so far as they are a See also:mirror of our sin and misery, but also to the third part, as being the See also:rule of our new obedience and See also:Christian life." The Creed—a See also:panorama of the See also:sublime facts of redemption—and the sacraments find their See also:place in the second part; the Lord's Prayer (with the Decalogue) in the third. See The Heidelberg Catechism, the See also:German See also:Text, with a Revised See also:Translation and Introduction, edited by A. Smellie (See also:London, 1900).

End of Article: HEIDELBERG CATECHISM, THE

Additional information and Comments

There are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click, and select "copy." Then paste it into your website, email, or other HTML.
Site content, images, and layout Copyright © 2006 - Net Industries, worldwide.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.

Links to articles and home page are always encouraged.

[back]
HEIDELBERG
[next]
HEIDELOFF, KARL ALEXANDER VON (1788–1865)