Online Encyclopedia

Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.

BACTRIA (Bactriana)

Online Encyclopedia
Originally appearing in Volume V03, Page 181 of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica.
Spread the word: del.icio.us del.icio.us it!

See also:

BACTRIA (Bactriana) , the See also:ancient name of the See also:country between the range of the See also:Hindu Kush (See also:Paropamisus) and the See also:Oxus (Amu Darya), with the See also:capital Bactra (now See also:Balkh); in the See also:Persian See also:inscriptions Bakhtri. It is a mountainous country with a moderate See also:climate. See also:Water is abundant and the See also:land is very fertile. Bactria was the See also:home of one of the Iranian tribes (see See also:PERSIA: Ancient See also:History). See also:Modern authors have often used the name in a wider sense, as the designation of the whole eastern See also:part of See also:Iran. As there can be scarcely any doubt that it was in these regions, where the fertile See also:soil of the mountainous country is everywhere surrounded and limited by the Turanian See also:desert, that the See also:prophet Zoroaster preached and gained his first adherents, and that his See also:religion spread from here over the western parts of •Iran, the sacred See also:language in which the Avesta, the See also:holy See also:book of Zoroastrianism, is written, has often been called " old Bactrian." But there is no See also:reason for this extensive use of the name, and the See also:term " old Bactrian " is, therefore, at See also:present completely abandoned by scholars. Still less See also:foundation exists for the belief, once widely spread, that Bactria was the See also:cradle of the Indo-See also:European See also:race; it was based on the supposition that the nations of See also:Europe had immigrated from See also:Asia, and that the See also:Aryan See also:languages (See also:Indian and Iranian) stood nearest to the See also:original language of the Indo-Europeans. It is now acknowledged by all linguists that this supposition is quite wrong, and that the See also:Aryans probably came from Europe. The eastern part of Iran seems to have been the region where the Aryans lived as See also:long as they formed one See also:people, and whence they separated into See also:Indians and Iranians. The Iranian tradition, preserved in the Avesta and in Firdousi's Shahnama, localizes a part of its heroes and myths in the See also:east of Iran, and has transformed the old gods who fight with the greatsnake into See also:kings of Iran who fight with the Turanian. Many modern authors have attempted to make history out of these stories, and have created an old Bactrian See also:empire of See also:great extent, . the kings of which had won great victories over the Turanian: But this See also:historical aspect of the myth is of See also:late origin: it is nothing but a reflex of the great Iranian empire founded by the Achaemenids and restored by the Sassanids. The only historical fact which we can learn from the Iranian tradition is that the contrast and the See also:feud between the peasants of Iran and the nomads of Turan was as great in old times as it is now: it is indeed based upon the natural See also:geographical conditions, and is therefore eternal.

But a great Bactrian empire certainly never existed; the Bactrian and their neighbours were in old times ruled by See also:

petty See also:local kings, one of whom was Vishtaspa, the See also:protector of Zoroaster. See also:Ctesias in his history of the See also:Assyrian empire (Diodor. Sic. ii. 6 ff.) narrates a See also:war waged by See also:Ninus and Semiram, against the See also:king of Bactria (whom some later authors, e.g. See also:Justin i. 1, See also:call Zoroaster). But the whole Assyrian history of Ctesias is nothing but a fantastic fiction; from the Assyrian inscriptions we know that the Assyrians never entered the eastern parts of Iran. Whether Bactria formed part of the Median empire, we do not know; but it was subjugated by See also:Cyrus and from then formed one of the satrapies of the Persian empire. When See also:Alexander had defeated See also:Darius III., his murderer See also:Bessus, the See also:satrap of Bactria, tried to organize a See also:national resistance in the east. But Bactria was conquered by Alexander without much difficulty; it was only farther in the See also:north, beyond the Oxus, in See also:Sogdiana, that he met with strong resistance. Bactria became a See also:province of the Macedonian empire, and soon came under the See also:rule of Seleucus, king of Asia (see SELEUCID See also:DYNASTY and See also:HELLENISM). The Macedonians (and especially Seleucus I. and his son See also:Antiochus I.) founded a great many See also:Greek towns in eastern Iran, and the Greek language became for some See also:time dominant there.

The many difficulties against which the Seleucid kings had to fight and the attacks of See also:

Ptolemy II., gave to See also:Diodotus, satrap of Bactria, the opportunity of making himself See also:independent (about 255 B.c.) and of conquering Sogdiana. He was the founder of the Graeco-Bactrian See also:kingdom. Diodotus and his successors were able to maintain themselves against the attacks of the Seleucids; and when Antiochus III., " the Great," had been defeated by the See also:Romans (190 B.c.), the Bactrian king See also:Euthydemus and his son See also:Demetrius crossed the Hindu Kush and began the See also:conquest of eastern Iran and the See also:Indus valley. For a See also:short time they wielded great See also:power; a great Greek empire seemed to have arisen far in the East. But this empire was torn by See also:internal dissensions and continual usurpations. When Demetrius advanced far into See also:India one of his generals, See also:Eucratides, made himself king of Bactria, and soon in every province there arose new usurpers, who See also:pro-claimed themselves kings and fought one against the other. Most of them we know only by their coins, a great many of which are found in See also:Afghanistan and India. By these See also:wars the dominant position of the Greeks was undermined even more quickly than would otherwise have been the See also:case. After Demetrius and Eucratides, the kings abandoned the See also:Attic See also:standard of coinage and introduced a native standard; at the same time the native language came into use by the See also:side of the Greek: On the coins struck in India, the well-known Indian See also:alphabet (called Brahmi by the Indians, the older See also:form of the Devanagari) is used; on the coins struck in Afghanistan and in the See also:Punjab the Kharoshthi alphabet, which is derived directly from the Aramaic and was in See also:common use in the western parts of India, as is shown by one of the inscriptions of See also:Asoka and by the See also:recent See also:discovery of many fragments of Indian See also:manuscripts, written in Kharoshthi, in eastern See also:Turkestan (formerly this alphabet has been called Arianic or Bactrian See also:Pali; the true name is derived from Indian See also:sources). The weakness of the Graeco-Bactrian kingdoms was shown by their sudden and See also:complete overthrow. In the See also:west the Arsacid empire had risen, and See also:Mithradates I. and Phraates II. began to conquer some of their western districts, especially Areia (See also:Herat). But in the north a new race appeared, Mongolian tribes, called Scythians by the Greeks, amongst which the Tochari, identical with the Yue-chi (q.v.) of the See also:Chinese, were the most important.

In 159 B.C., according to Chinese sources, they entered Sogdiana, in 139 they conquered Bactria, and during the next See also:

generation they had made an end to the Greek rule in eastern Iran. Only in India the Greek conquerors (See also:Menander, Apollodotus) maintained themselves some time longer. But in the See also:middle of the 1st See also:century B.C. the whole of eastern Iran and western India belonged to the great " Indo-Scythian " empire. The ruling dynasty had the name Kushan (Kushana), by which they are called on their coins and in the Persian sources. The most famous of these kings is See also:Kanishka (ca. 123-153), the great protector of See also:Buddhism. The See also:principal seat of the Tochari and the Kushan dynasty seems to have been Bactria; but they always maintained the eastern parts of modern Afghanistan and See also:Baluchistan, while the western regions (Areia, i.e. Herat, See also:Seistan and part of the See also:Helmund valley) were conquered by the Arsacids. In the 3rd century the Kushan dynasty began to decay; about A.D. 320 the See also:Gupta empire was founded in India. Thus the Kushanas were reduced to eastern Iran, where they had to fight against the Sassanids. In the 5th century a new people came from the east, the See also:Ephthalites (q.v.) or " See also:white See also:Huns," who subjected Bactria (about 450); and they were followed by the See also:Turks, who first appear in history about A.D.

560 and subjugated the country north of the Oxus. Most of the small principalities of the Tochari or Kushan became subject to them. But when the See also:

Sassanian empire was overthrown by the See also:Arabs, the conquerors immediately, advanced eastwards, and in a few years Bactria and the whole Iran to the See also:banks of the Jaxartes had submitted to the rule of the See also:caliph and of See also:Islam.

End of Article: BACTRIA (Bactriana)

Additional information and Comments

There are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click, and select "copy." Then paste it into your website, email, or other HTML.
Site content, images, and layout Copyright © 2006 - Net Industries, worldwide.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.

Links to articles and home page are always encouraged.

[back]
BACTERIOLOGY
[next]
BACUP