Online Encyclopedia
Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
HALLUCINATION (from Lat. alucinari or...
Online EncyclopediaEncyclopedia Home :: GUI-HAN
del.icio.us it!
|
See also:HALLUCINATION (from See also:Lat. alucinari or allucinari, to wander in mind, Gr. a.)^i resty or hXvecv, from an, wandering) , a psychological See also:term which has been the subject of much controversy, and to which, although there is now See also:fair agreement as to its See also:denotation, it is still impossible to give a precise and entirely satisfactory See also:definition. Hallucinations constitute one of the two See also:great classes of all false sense-perceptions, the other class consisting of the " illusions," and the difficulty of definition is clearly to See also:mark the boundary between the two classes. Illusion may be defined as the misinterpretation of sense-impression, while hallucination, in its typical instances, is the experiencing of a sensory presentation, i.e. a presentation having the sensory vividness that distinguishes perceptions from representative imagery, at a See also:time when no stimulus is acting on the corresponding sense-See also:organ. There is, however, See also:good See also:reason to think that in many cases, possibly in all cases, some stimulation of the sense-organ, coming either from without or from within the See also:body, plays a See also:part in the See also:genesis of the hallucination. This being so, we must be content to leave the boundary between illusions and hallucinations See also:ill-defined, and to regard as illusions those false perceptions in which impressions made on the sense-organ See also:play a leading part in determining the See also:character of the percept, and as hallucinations those in which any such impression is lacking, or plays but a subsidiary part and bears no obvious relation to the character of the false percept. As in the See also:case of illusion, hallucination may or may not involve delusion, or belief in the reality of the See also:object falsely perceived. Among the sane the hallucinatory object is frequently recognized at once as unreal or at least as but quasi-real; and it is only the insane, or persons in abnormal states, such as hypnosis, who, when an hallucination persists or recurs, fail to recognize that it corresponds to no See also:physical impression from, or object in, the See also:outer See also:world. Hallucinations of all the senses occur, but the most commonly reported are the auditory and the visual, while those of the other senses seem to be comparatively rare. This apparent difference of frequency is no doubt largely due to the more striking character of visual and auditory hallucinations, and to the relative difficulty of ascertaining, in the case of perceptions of the See also:lower senses, e.g. of See also:taste and See also:smell, that no impression adequate to the genesis of the percept has been made upon the sense-organ; but, in so far as it is real, it is probably due in part to the more See also:constant use of the higher senses and the greater See also:strain consequently thrown upon them, in part also to their more intimate connexion with the See also:life of ideas. The hallucinatory See also:perception may involve two or more senses, e.g., the subject may seem to see a human being, to hear his See also:voice and to feel the See also:touch of his See also:hand. This is rarely the case in spontaneous hallucination, but in hypnotic hallucination the subject is See also:apt to develop the object suggested to him, as See also:present to one of his senses, and to perceive it also through other senses. Among visual hallucinations the human figure, and among auditory hallucinations human voices, are the See also:objects most commonly perceived. The figure seen always appears localized more or less definitely in the outer world. In many cases it appears related to the objects truly seen in just the same way as a real object; e.g. it is no longer seen if the eyes are closed or turned away, it does not move with the movements of the eyes, and it may hide objects lying behind it, or be hidden by objects coming between the See also:place that it appears to occupy and the See also:eye of the percipient. Visual hallucinations are most often experienced when the eyes are open and the surrounding space is well or even brightly illuminated. Less frequently the visual hallucination takes the See also:form of a self-luminous figure in a dark place or appears in a luminous globe or mist which shuts out from view the real objects of the part of the See also: These sporadic hallucinations of waking healthy persons are far more frequently visual than auditory, and they usually take the form of some See also:familiar See also:person in See also:ordinary attire. The figure in many cases is seen, on turning the gaze in some new direction, fully See also:developed and lifelike, and its hallucinatory character may be revealed only by its noiseless movements, or by its fading away in situ. A See also:special See also:interest attaches to hallucinations of this type, owing to the occasional coincidence of the See also:death of the person with his hallucinatory See also:appearance. The question raised by these coincidences will be discussed in a See also:separate See also:paragraph below. b. A few persons, otherwise normal in mind and body, seem to experience repeatedly some particular See also:kind of hallucination. The voice (Saeµovwv) so frequently heard by See also:Socrates, warning or advising him, is the most celebrated example of this type. II. Conditions more or less unusual or abnormal but not implying distinct Departure from Health. a. A kind of hallucination to which perhaps every normal person is liable is that known technically as " recurrent sensation." This kind is experienced only when some sense-organ has been continuously or repeatedly subjected to some one kind of impression or stimulation for a considerable See also:period; e.g. the microscopist, after examining for some See also:hours one particular kind of object or structure, may suddenly perceive the object faithfully reproduced in form and See also:colour, and lying, as it were, upon any See also:surface to which his gaze is directed. Perhaps the commonest experience of this type is the recurrence of the sensations of movement at intervals in the period following a See also:sea voyage or See also:long railway See also:journey. b. A considerable proportion of healthy sane persons can induce hallucinations of See also:vision by gazing fixedly at a polishedsurface or into some dark translucent See also:mass; or of See also:hearing, by applying a large See also:shell or similar object to the See also:ear. These methods of inducing hallucinations, especially the former, have long been practised in many countries as modes of See also:divination, various objects being used, e.g. a drop of See also:ink in the See also:palm of the hand, or a polished See also:finger-See also:nail. The object now most commonly used is a polished See also:sphere of clear See also:glass or crystal (see CRYSTAL-GAZING). Hence such hallucinations go by the name of crystal visions. The crystal vision often appears as a picture of some distant or unknown See also:scene lying, as it were, in the crystal; and in the picture figures may come and go, and move to and fro, in a perfectly natural manner. In other cases, written or printed words or sentences appear. The percipient, seer or scryer, commonly seems to be in a fully waking state as he observes the objects thus presented. He is usually able to describe and discuss the appearances, successively discriminating details by attentive observation, just as when observing an See also:objective scene; and he usually has no See also:power of controlling them, and no sense of having produced them by his own activity. In some cases these visions have brought back to the mind of the scryer facts or incidents which he could not voluntarily recollect. In other cases they are asserted by credible witnesses to have given to the scryer See also:information, about events distant in time or place, that had not come to his knowledge by normal means. These cases have been claimed as See also:evidence of telepathic communication or even of See also:clairvoyance. But at present the number of well-attested cases of this sort is too small to justify See also:acceptance of this conclusion by those who have only secondhand knowledge of them. c. Prolonged deprivation of See also:food predisposes to hallucinations, and it would seem that, under this See also:condition, a large proportion of otherwise healthy persons become liable to them, especially to auditory hallucinations. d. Certain drugs, notably See also:opium, See also:Indian See also:hemp, and mescal predispose to hallucinations, each tending to produce a See also:peculiar type. Thus Indian hemp and mescal, especially the latter, produce in many cases visual hallucinations in the form of a brilliant play of See also:colours, sometimes a See also:mere successibn of patches of brilliant colour, sometimes in architectural or other definite spatial arrangement. e. The states of transition from See also:sleep to waking, and from waking to sleep, seem to be peculiarly favourable to the appearance of hallucinations. The recurrent sensations mentioned above are especially prone to appear at such times, and a considerable proportion of the sporadic hallucinations of persons in good health are reported to have been experienced under these conditions. The name " hypnagogic " hallucinations, first applied by See also:Alfred See also:Maury, is commonly given to those experienced in these transition states. f. The presentations, predominantly visual, that constitute the See also:principal content of most dreams, are generally described as hallucinatory, but the propriety of so classing them is very questionable. The present writer is confident that his own See also:dream-presentations lack the sensory vividness which is the essential mark of the percept, whether normal or hallucinatory, and which is the principal, though not the only, character in which it differs from the See also:representation or memory-See also:image. It is true that the dream-presentation, like the percept, differs from the representative imagery of waking life in that it is relatively See also:independent of volition; but that seems to be merely because the will is in See also:abeyance or very ineffective during sleep. The wide currency of the See also:doctrine that classes dream-images with hallucinations seems to be due to this See also:independence of volitional See also:control, and to the fact that during sleep the representative imagery appears without that See also:rich setting of undiscriminated or marginal sensation which always accompanies waking imagery, and which by contrast accentuates for introspective reflection the lack of sensory vividness of such imagery. g. Many of the subjects who pass into the deeper stages of hypnosis (see See also:HYPNOTISM) show themselves, while in that condition, extremely liable to hallucination, perceiving whatever object is suggested to them as present, and failing to perceive any object of which it is asserted by the operator that it is no longer present. The reality of these See also:positive and negative hallucinations of the hypnotized subject has been recently questioned, it being maintained that the subject merely gives verbal assent to the suggestions of the operator. But that the hypnotized subject does really experience hallucinations seems to be proved by the cases in which it is possible to make the hallucination, positive or negative, persist for some time after the termination of hypnosis, and by the fact that in some of these cases the subject, who in the See also:post-hypnotic state seems in every other respect normal and wide awake, may find it difficult to distinguish between the hallucinatory and real objects. Further See also:proof is afforded by experiments such as those by which Alfred Binet showed that a visual hallucination may behave for its percipient in many respects like a real object, e.g. that it may appear reflected in a See also:mirror, displaced by a See also:prism and coloured when a coloured glass is placed before the patient's eyes. It was by means of experiments of this kind that Binet showed that hypnotic hallucinations may approximate to the type of the illusion, i.e. that some real object affecting the sense-organ (in the case of a visual hallucination some detail of the surface upon which it is projected) may provide a See also:nucleus of peripherally excited sensation around which the false percept is built up. An object playing a part of this sort in the genesis of an hallucination is known as a " point de repere." It has been maintained that all hallucinations involve some such point de repere or objective nucleus; but there are good reasons for rejecting this view. h. In states of See also:ecstasy, or intense emotional concentration of See also:attention upon some one ideal object, the object contemplated seems at times to take on sensory vividness, and so to acquire the character of an hallucination. In these cases the state of mind of the subject is probably similar in many respects to that of the deeply hypnotized subject, and these two classes of hallucination may be regarded as very closely allied. in severe cases of See also:hysteria, and are usually accompanied by hemi-See also:anaesthesia of the body on the See also:side on which the hallucinatory object is perceived. d. Hallucinations occur in a large, but not accurately definable, proportion of all cases of mental disease proper. Two classes are recognized: (I) those that are intimately connected with the dominant emotional state or with some dominant delusion; (2) those that occur sporadically and have no such obvious relation to the other symptoms of disease. Hallucinations of the former class tend to accentuate, and in turn to be confirmed by, the congruent emotional or delusional state; but whether these are to be regarded as See also:primary symptoms and as the cause of the hallucinations, or See also:vice versa, it is generally impossible to say. Patients who suffer delusions of persecution are very apt to develop later in the course of their disease hallucinations of the voices of their persecutors; while in other cases hallucinatory voices, which are at first recognized as such, come to be regarded as real and in these cases seem to be factors of primary importance in the genesis of further delusions. Hallucinations occur in almost every variety of mental disease, but are commonest in the forms characterized by a cloudy dream-like condition of consciousness, and in extreme cases of this sort the patient (as in the See also:delirium of chronic See also:alcohol-poisoning) seems to move waking through a world consisting largely of the images of his own creation, set upon a background of real objects. In some cases hallucinations are frequently experienced for long periods in the See also:absence of any other symptom of mental disorder, but these no doubt usually imply some morbid condition of the See also:brain. See also:Physiology of Hallucination.—There has been much discussion as to the nature of the neural See also:process in hallucination. It is generally and rightly assumed that the hallucinatory perception of any object has for its immediate neural correlate a state of excitement which, as regards its characters and its See also:distribution in the elements of the brain, is entirely similar to the neural correlate of the normal perception of the same object. The hallucination is a perception, though a false perception. In the perception of an object and in the representation of it, introspective See also:analysis discovers a number of presentative elements. In the case of the representation these elements are memory images only (except perhaps in so far as actual See also:kin-aesthetic sensations enter into its See also:composition); whereas, in the case of the percept, some of these elements are sensations, sensations which differ from images in having the attribute of sensory vividness; and the sensory vividness of these elements lends to the whole complex the sensory vividness or reality, the See also:possession of which character by the percept constitutes its principal difference from the representation. Normally, sensory vividness attaches only to those presentative elements which are excited through stimulations of the sense-organs. The normal percept, then, owes its character of sensory reality to the fact that a certain number of its presentative elements are sensations peripherally excited by impressions made upon a sense-organ. The problem is, then, to See also:account for the fact that the hallucination contains presentative elements that have sensory vividness, that are sensations, although they are not excited by impressions from the See also:external world falling upon a sense-organ. Most of the discussions of this subject suffer from the neglect of this preliminary definition of the problem. Many authors, notably W. See also:Wundt and his disciples, have been content to assume that the sensation differs from the memory-image only in having a higher degree of intensity; from which they infer that its neural correlate in the brain cortex also differs from that of the image only in having a higher degree of intensity. For them an hallucination is therefore merely a representation whose neural correlate involves an intensity of excitement of certain brain-elements such as is normally produced only by peripheral stimulation of sensory nerves in the sense-organs. But this view, so attractively See also:simple, ignores an insuperable objection. Sensory vividness is not to be identified with See also:superior intensity; for while the least intense sensation has it, the memory image of the most intense sensation lacks it completely. a. Dr H. Head has the See also:credit of having shown for the first time, in the See also:year 19o1, that many patients, suffering from more or less painful visceral diseases, disorders of See also:heart, lungs, abdominal viscera, &c., are liable to experience hallucinations of a peculiar kind. These " visceral " hallucinations, which are constantly accompanied by headache of the reflected visceral type, are most commonly visual, more rarely auditory. In all Dr Head's cases the visual hallucination took the form of a shrouded human figure, colourless and vague, often incomplete, generally seen by the patient See also:standing by his See also:bed when he wakes in a dimly lit See also:room. The auditory " visceral " hallucination was in no instance vocal, but took'such forms as sounds of tapping, scratching or rumbling, and were heard only in the absence of objective noises. In a few cases the " visceral " hallucination was bisensory, i.e. both auditory and visual. In all these respects the " visceral " hallucination differs markedly from the commoner types of the sporadic hallucination of healthy persons. b. Hallucinations are constant symptoms of certain See also:general disorders in which the See also:nervous See also:system is involved, notably of the delirium tremens, which results from chronic alcohol poisoning. and of the delirium of the acute specific fevers. The hallucinations of these states are generally of a distressing or even terrifying character. Especially is this the See also:rule with those of delirium tremens, and in the hallucinations of this disease certain kinds of objects, e.g. rats and See also:snakes, occur with curious frequency. c. Hallucinations occasionally occur as symptoms of certain nervous diseases that are not usually classed with the insanities, notably in cases of See also:epilepsy and severe forms of hysteria. In the former disorder, the sensory See also:aura that so often precedes the epileptic convulsion may take the form of an hallucinatory object, which in some cases is very constant in character. Unilateral hallucinations, an especially interesting class, occur And, since intensity of sensation is a See also:function of the intensity of the underlying neural excitement, we may not assume that sensory vividness is also the expression in consciousness of that intensity of excitement. If Wundt's view were true a progressive diminution of the intensity of a sensory stimulus should bring the sensation to a point in the See also:scale of diminishing intensity at which it ceases to be sensation, ceases to have sensory vividness and becomes an image merely. But this is not the case; with diminishing intensity of stimulation, the sensation declines to a minimal intensity and then disappears from consciousness. This objection applies not only to Wundt's view of hallucinations, but also to H. See also:Taine's explanation of them by the aid of his doctrine of " reductives," for this too identifies sensory vividness with intensity. (H. Taine, De l'intelligence, tome i. p. ro8.) Another widely current explanation is based on the view that the representation and the percept have their anatomical bases in different See also:element-See also:groups or " centres " of the brain, the " centre " of the representation being assigned to a higher level of the brain than that of the percept (the latter being sometimes assigned to the basal ganglia of the brain, the former to the cortex). It is then assumed that while the lower perceptual centre is normally excited only through the sense-organ, it may occasionally be excited by impulses playing down upon it from the corresponding centre of representation, when hallucination results. This view also is far from satisfactory, because the great additions recently made to our knowledge of the brain tend very strongly to show that both sensations and memory-images have their anatomical bases in the same sensory areas of the cerebral cortex; and many considerations converge to show that their anatomical bases must be, in part at least, identical. The views based on the assumptions of See also:complete identity, and of complete separateness, of the anatomical bases of the percept and of the representation are then alike untenable; and the alternative—that their anatomical bases are in part identical, in part different, which is indicated by this conclusion—renders possible a far more satisfactory doctrine. We have good reason to believe that the neural correlate of sensation is the trans-See also:mission of the nervous impulse through a sensori-motor arc of the cortex, made up of a See also:chain of neurones; and the view suggests itself that the neural correlate of the corresponding memory-image is the transmission of the impulse through a part only of this chain of cortical elements, either the efferent motor part of this chain or the afferent sensory part of it. See also:Professor W. See also: If any such neural system becomes abnormally excitable, or becomes excited in any way with abnormal intensity, it is thereby rendered a path of exceptionally See also:low-resistance capable of diverting to itself, from their normal path, any streams of impulses ascending from the sense-organ; which ascending impulses, entering the system by its afferent inlets, excite sensations that impart to the presentation the character of sensory vividness; the presentation thus acquires the character of a percept in spite of the absence of the appropriate impression on the sense-organ, and we See also:call it an hallucination. This view renders intelligible the modus operandi of many of the predisposing causes of hallucination; e.g. the pre-occupation with certain representations of the ecstatic, or of the sufferer from delusions of persecution; the intense expectation of a particular sense impression, the generally increased excitability of the cortex in states of delirium; in all these conditions the abnormally intense excitement of the cortical systems may be supposed to give them an undue directive and attractive See also:influence upon the streams of impulses ascending from the sense-organs, so that sensory impulses may be diverted from their normal paths. Again, it renders intelligible the part played by chronic irritation of a sense-organ, as when chronic irritation of the See also:internal ear leads on to hallucinations of hearing; perhaps also the chronic irritation of sensory nerves that must accompany the states of visceral disease, shown by Head to be so frequently accompanied by a liability to hallucinations; for any such chronic irritation supplies a stream of disorderly impulses rising constantly from the sense-organ, for the reception of which the brain has no appropriate system, and which, therefore, readily enters any organized cortical system that at any moment constitutes a path of low-resistance. A similar explanation applies to the influence of fixed gazing upon a crystal, or the placing of a shell over the ear, in inducing visual and auditory hallucinations, The " recurrent sensations " experienced after prolonged occupation with some one kind of sensory object may be regarded as due to an abnormal excitability of the cortical system concerned, resulting from its unduly prolonged exercise. The See also:hypothesis renders intelligible also the liability to hallucination of persons in the hysterical and hypnotic states, in whose brains the cortical neural systems. are in a state of partial See also:dissociation, which renders possible an unduly intense and prolonged excitement of some one system at the expense of all other systems (cf. HYPNOTISM). Coincidental Hallucinations.—It would seem that, in well-nigh all countries and in all ages, See also:apparitions of persons known to be in distant places have been occasionally observed. Such appearances have usually been regarded as due to the presence, before the bodily eye of the seer, of the See also:ghost, See also:wraith, See also:double or soul of the person who thus appears; and, since the soul has been very commonly supposed to leave the body, permanently at death and temporarily during sleep, See also:trance or any period of unconsciousness, however induced, it was natural to regard such an appearance as evidence that the person whose wraith was thus seen was in some such condition. Such apparitions have probably played a part, second only to that of dreams, in generating the almost universal belief in the separability of soul and body. In many parts of the world traditional belief has connected such apparitions more especially with the death of the person so appearing, the apparition being regarded as an indication that the person so appearing has recently died, is dying or is about to See also:die. Since death is so much less common an event than sleep, trance, or other form of temporary unconsciousness, the wide See also:extension of this belief suggests that such apparitions may coincide in time with death, with disproportionate frequency. The belief in the significance of such apparitions still survives in civilized communities, and stories of apparitions coinciding with the death of the person appearing are occasionally reported in the See also:newspapers, or related as having recently occurred. The Society for Psychical Research has sought to find grounds for an See also:answer to the question " Is there any sufficient See also:justification for the belief in a causal relation between the apparition of a person at a place distant from his body and his death or other exceptional and momentous event in his experience?" The problem was attacked in a thoroughly scientific spirit, an extensive inquiry was made, and the results were presented and fully discussed in two large volumes, Phantasms of the Living, published in the year 1886, bearing on the See also:title-See also:page the names of See also:Edmund See also:Gurney, F. W. H. See also:Myers and F. Podmore. Of the three collaborators Gurney took the largest See also:share in the planning of the See also:work, in the collection of evidence, and in the elaboration and discussion of it. Gurney set out with the presumption that apparitions, whether coincidental or not, are hallucinations in the sense defined above; that they are false perceptions and are not excited by any object or process of the external world acting upon the sense-organs of the percipient in normal See also:fashion; that they do not imply the presence, in the place apparently occupied by them, of any wraith or any form of existence emanating from, or specially connected with, the person whose phantasm appears. This initial assumption was abundantly justified by an examination of a large number of cases for it, which showed that, in all important respects, most of these apparitions of persons at a distance, whether coincidental or not, were similar to other forms of hallucination. The acceptance of this conclusion does not, however, imply a negative answer to the question formulated above. The Society for Psychical Research had accumulated an impressive and, to almost all those who had first-hand acquaintance with it, a convincing mass of experimental evidence of the reality of See also:telepathy (q.v.), the influence of mind on mind otherwise than through the recognized channels of sense. The successful experiments had for the most part been made between persons in See also:close proximity, in the same room or in adjoining rooms; but they seemed to show that the state of consciousness of one person may induce directly (i.e. without the See also:mediation of the organs of expression and sense-perception) a similar state of consciousness in another person, especially if the former, usually called the " See also:agent," strongly desired or " willed " that this effect should be produced on the other person, the " percipient." The question formulated above thus resolved itself for Gurney into the more definite form, " Can we find any good reason for believing that coincidental hallucinations are sometimes veridical, that the state of mind of a person at some great crisis of his experience may telepathically induce in the mind of some distant relative or friend an hallucinatory perception of himself ? " It was at once obvious that, if coincidental apparitions can be proved to occur, this question can only be answered by a statistical inquiry; for each such coincidental hallucination, considered alone, may always be regarded as most educated persons of the present time have regarded them, namely, as merely accidental coincidences. That the coincidences are not merely accidental can only be proved by showing that they occur more frequently than the doctrine of chances would justify us in expecting. Now, the death of any person is a unique event, and the See also:probability of its occurrence upon any particular See also:day may be very simply calculated from the mortality See also:statistics, if we assume that nothing is known of the individual's vitality. On the other hand, hallucinatory perceptions of persons, occurring to sane and healthy individuals in the fully waking state, are comparatively rare occurrences, whose frequency we may See also:hope to determine by a statistical inquiry. If, then, we can obtain figures expressing the frequency of such hallucinations, we can deduce, by the help of the See also:laws of See also:chance, the proportion of such hallucinations that may be expected to coincide with (or, for the purposes of the inquiry,. to fall within twelve hours of) the death of the person whose apparition appears, if no causal relation obtains between the coinciding events. If, then, it appears that the proportion of such coincidental hallucinations is greater than the laws of probability will account for, a certain presumption of a causal relation between the coinciding events is thereby established; and the greater the excess of such coincidences, the stronger does this presumption become. Gurney attempted a census of hallucinations in See also:order to obtain data for this statistical treatment, and the results of it, embodied in Phantasms of the Living, were considered by the authors of that work to justify the belief that some coincidental hallucinations are veridical. In the year 1889 the Society for Psychical Research appointed a See also:committee, under the chairmanship of the See also:late See also: The making of these adjustments gives us about i in 43 as the proportion of coincidental death-apparitions to the total number of recognized apparitions among the 17,000 persons reached by the census. Now the death-See also:rate being just over 19 per thousand, the probability that any person taken at See also:random will die on a given day is about 1 in 19,000; or, more strictly speaking, the See also:average probability that any person will die within any given period of twenty-four hours duration is about I in 19,000. Hence the probability that any other particular event, having no causal relation to his death, but occurring during his lifetime (or not later than twelve hours after his death) will fall within the same twenty-four hours as his death is I in 19,000; i.e. if an apparition of any individual is seen and recognized by any other person, the probability of its being experienced within twelve hours of that individual's death is r in 19,000, if no causal relation obtains between the two events. Therefore, of all recognized apparitions of living persons, i only in 19,000 may be expected to be a death-coincidence of this sort. But the census shows that of 1300 recognized apparitions of living persons 30 are death-coincidences and that is See also:equivalent to 440 in 19,000. Hence, of recognized hallucinations, those coinciding with death are 440 times more numerous than we should expect, if no causal relation obtained; therefore, if neither the data nor the reasoning can be destructively criticized, we are compelled to believe that some causal relation obtains; and, since good evidence of telepathic communication has been experimentally obtained, the least improbable explanation of these death-apparitions is that the dying person exerts upon his distant friend some telepathic influence which generates an hallucinatory perception of himself. These death-coincidences constitute the See also:main feature of the See also:argument in favour of telepathic communication between distant persons, but the census of hallucinations afforded other data from which a variety of arguments, tending to support this conclusion, were See also:drawn by the committee; of these the most important are the cases in which the hallucinatory percept embodied details that were connected with the person perceived and which could not have become known to the percipient by any normal means. The committee could not find in the results of the census any evidence sufficient to justify a belief that hallucinations may be due to telepathic influence exerted by personalities surviving the death of the body. The See also:critical handling of the cases by the committee seems to be above reproach. Those who do not accept their conclusion based on the death-coincidences must See also:direct their criticism to the question of the reliability of the reports of these cases. It is to be noted that, although only those cases are reckoned in which the percipient had no cause to expect the death of the person whose apparition he experienced, and although, in nearly all the accepted cases, some See also:record or communication of the hallucination was made before hearing of the death, yet in very few cases was any contemporary written record of the event forthcoming for the inspection of the committee. (W. Additional information and CommentsThere are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click, and select "copy." Then paste it into your website, email, or other HTML. Site content, images, and layout Copyright © 2006 - Net Industries, worldwide. |
|
|
[back] HALLSTATT |
[next] HALLUIN |