Online Encyclopedia

Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.

ANTIOCHUS III

Online Encyclopedia
Originally appearing in Volume V24, Page 605 of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica.
Spread the word: del.icio.us del.icio.us it!

See also:

ANTIOCHUS III . THE See also:GREAT (242-187), Callinicus's younger son, a youth of about eighteen, now succeeded to a disorganized See also:kingdom (223). Not only was See also:Asia See also:Minor detached, but the further eastern provinces had broken away, See also:Bactria under the See also:Greek See also:Diodotus (q.v.), and See also:Parthia under the See also:nomad chieftain See also:Arsaces. Soon after Antiochus's See also:accession, See also:Media and See also:Persis revolted under their See also:governors, the See also:brothers Molon and See also:Alexander. The See also:young See also:king was in the hands of the See also:bad See also:minister Hermeias, and was induced to make an attack on See also:Palestine instead of going in See also:person to See also:face the rebels. The attack on Palestine was a fiasco, and the generals sent against Molon and Alexander met with disaster. Only in Asia Minor, where the Seleucid cause was represented by the king's See also:cousin, the able Achaeus, was its See also:prestige restored and the Pergamene See also:power driven back to its earlier limits. In 221 Antiochus at last went See also:east, and the See also:rebellion of Molon and Alexander collapsed. The submission of Lesser Media, which had asserted its See also:independence under Artabazanes, followed. Antiochus rid himself of Hermeias by assassination and returned to See also:Syria (220). Meanwhile Achaeus himself had revolted and assumed the See also:title of king in Asia Minor. Since, however, his power was not well enough grounded to allow of his attacking Syria, Antiochus considered that he might leave Achaeus for the See also:present and renew his See also:attempt on Palestine.

The See also:

campaigns of 219 and 218 carried the Seleucid arms almost to the confines of See also:Egypt, but in 217 See also:Ptolemy IV. confronted Antiochus at Raphia and inflicted a defeat upon him which nullified all Antiochus's successes and compelled him to withdraw See also:north of the See also:Lebanon. In 216 Antiochus went north to See also:deal with Achaeus, and had by 214 driven him from the See also:field into See also:Sardis. Antiochus contrived to get See also:possession of the person of Achaeus (see See also:POLYBIUS), but the citadel held out till 213 under Achaeus's widow and then surrendered. Having thus recovered the central See also:part of Asia Minor—for the dynasties in See also:Pergamum, See also:Bithynia and See also:Cappadocia the Seleucid See also:government was obliged to tolerate—Antiochus turned to recover the outlying provinces of the north and east. See also:Xerxes of See also:Armenia was brought to acknowledge his supremacy in 212. In 209 Antiochus invaded Parthia, occupied the See also:capital Hecatompylus and pushed forward into See also:Hyrcania. The See also:Parthian king was apparently granted See also:peace on his submission. In 209 Antiochus was in Bactria, where the See also:original See also:rebel had been supplanted by another Greek See also:Euthydemus (see further BACTRIA and articles on the See also:separate rulers). The issue was again favourable to Antiochus. After sustaining a famous See also:siege in his capital Bactra (See also:Balkh), Euthydemus obtained an See also:honour-able peace by which the See also:hand of one of Antiochus's daughters was promised to his son See also:Demetrius. Antiochus next, following in the steps of Alexander, crossed into the See also:Kabul valley, received the See also:homage of the See also:Indian king Sophagasenus and returned See also:west by way of See also:Seistan and See also:Kerman (206/5). From See also:Seleucia on the See also:Tigris he led a See also:short expedition down the See also:Persian Gulf against the Gerrhaeans of the Arabian See also:coast (205/4).

Antiochus seemed to have restored the Seleucid See also:

empire in the east, and the achievement brought him the title of " the Great King." In 205/4 the See also:infant Ptolemy V. Epiphanes succeeded to the See also:Egyptian See also:throne, and Antiochus concluded a See also:secret pact with See also:Philip of See also:Macedonia for the See also:partition of the Ptolemaic possessions. Once more Antiochus attacked Palestine, and by 199 he seems to have had possession of it. It was, however, recovered for Ptolemy by the Aetolian See also:Scopas. But the recovery was brief, for in 198 Scopas was defeated by Antiochus at the See also:battle of the Panium, near the See also:sources of the See also:Jordan, a battle which marks the end of Ptolemaic See also:rule in Palestine. In 197 Antiochus moved to Asia Minor to secure the coast towns which had acknowledged Ptolemy and the See also:independent Greek cities. It was this enterprise which brought him into antagonism with See also:Rome, since See also:Smyrna and See also:Lampsacus appealed to the See also:republic of the west, and the tension became greater after Antiochus had in 196 established a footing in See also:Thrace. The evacuation of See also:Greece by the See also:Romans gave Antiochus his opportunity, and he now had the fugitive See also:Hannibal at his See also:court to urge him on. In 192 Antiochus invaded Greece, having the Aetolians and other Greek states as his See also:allies. In 191, however, he was routed at See also:Thermopylae by the Romans under Manius Acilius See also:Glabrio, and obliged to withdraw to Asia. But the Romans followed up their success by attacking Antiochus in Asia Minor, and the decisive victory of L. See also:Cornelius Scipio at See also:Magnesia ad Sipylum (190), following on the defeat of Hannibal at See also:sea off See also:Side, gave Asia Minor into their hands.

By the peace of See also:

Apamea (188) the Seleucid king abandoned all the See also:country north of the See also:Taurus, which was distributed among the See also:friends of Rome. As a consequence of this See also:blow to the Seleucid power, the outlying provinces of the empire, recovered by Antiochus, reasserted their independence. Antiochus perished in a fresh expedition to the east in Luristan (187). The Seleucid kingdom as Antiochus See also:left it to his son, SELEUCUS IV. PHILOPATOR (reigned 187-176), consisted of Syria (now including See also:Cilicia and Palestine), See also:Mesopotamia, Babylonia and Nearer See also:Iran (Media and Persis). Seleucus IV. was compelled by See also:financial necessities, created in part by the heavy See also:war-See also:indemnity exacted by Rome, to pursue an unambitious policy, and was assassinated by his minister See also:Heliodorus. The true See also:heir, Demetrius, son of Seleucus, being now retained in Rome as a See also:hostage, the kingdom was seized by the younger See also:brother of Seleucus, ANTIOCHUS IV. EPIPHANES (i.e. " the See also:Manifest [See also:god]"; parodied Epimanes, " the mad "), who reigned 176-164. In 170 Egypt, governed by regents for the boy Ptolemy Philometor, attempted to reconquer Palestine; Antiochus not only defeated this attempt but invaded and occupied Egypt. He failed to take See also:Alexandria, where the See also:people set up the younger brother of Philometor, Ptolemy Eurgetes, as king, but he left Philometor as his ally installed at See also:Memphis. When the two brothers combined, Antiochus again invaded Egypt (168), but was compelled to retire by the See also:Roman See also:envoy C.

Popillius See also:

Laenas (See also:consul 172), after the historic See also:scene in which the Roman See also:drew a circle in the See also:sand about the king and demanded his See also:answer before he stepped out of it. Antiochus exercised his contemporaries by the See also:riddles of his See also:half-brilliant, half-crazy See also:personality. He had resided at Rome as a hostage, and afterwards for his See also:pleasure at See also:Athens, and had brought to his kingdom an admiration for republican institutions and an See also:enthusiasm for Hellenic culture—or, at any See also:rate, for its externals. There is See also:evidence that the forms of Greek See also:political See also:life were more fully adopted under his sway by many of the Syrian cities. He spent lavishly on public buildings at See also:home and in the older centres of See also:Hellenism, like Athens. Gorgeous display and theatrical pomp were his delight. At the same See also:time he scandalized the See also:world by his riotous living and undignified familiarities. But he could persevere in an astute policy under the See also:cover of an easy geniality and had no scruples. It is his contact with the See also:Jews which has chiefly interested later ages, and he is doubtless the monarch described in the pseudo-prophetic chapters of See also:Daniel (q.v.). See also:Jerusalem, near the Egyptian frontier, was an important point, and in one of its See also:internal revolutions Antiochus saw, perhaps not without See also:reason, a defection to the Egyptian side. His chastisement of the See also:city, including as it did the spoliation of the See also:temple, served the additional purpose of relieving his financial necessities. It was a measure of a very different See also:kind when, a See also:year or two later (after 168), Antiochus tried to suppress the practices of Judaism by force, and it wasthis which provoked the Maccabaean rebellion (see See also:MACCABEES) .

In 166 Antiochus left Syria to attempt the reconquest of the further provinces. He seems to have been signally. successful. Armenia returned to See also:

allegiance, the capital of Media was re-colonized as Epiphanea, and Antiochus was pursuing his plans in the east when he died at Tabaein Persis, after exhibiting some sort of See also:mental derangement (See also:winter 164/3). He left a son of nine years, ANTIOCHUS V. EUPATOR (reigned 164-162), in whose name the kingdom was administered by a camarilla. Their government was feeble and corrupt. The attempt to check the Jewish rebellion ended in a weak See also:compromise. Their subservience to Rome so enraged the Greek cities of Syria that the Roman envoy Graeus Octavius (consul 165 B.e.) was assassinated in See also:Laodicea (162). At this juncture Demetrius, the son of Seleucus IV., escaped from Rome and was received in Syria as the true king. Antiochus Eupator was put to See also:death. DEMETRIUS I. See also:SOTER (reigned 162-150) was a strong and ambitious ruler.

He crushed the rebellion of Timarchus in Media and reduced See also:

Judaea to new subjection. But he was unpopular at See also:Antioch, and See also:fell before a See also:coalition of the three See also:kings of Egypt, Pergamum and Cappadocia. An impostor, who claimed to be a son of Antiochus Epiphanes, ALEXANDER B ALAS (reigned 150-145), was installed as king by Ptolemy Philometor and given Ptolemy's daughter See also:Cleopatra to wife, but Alexander proved to be dissolute and incapable, and when Demetrius, the son of Demetrius I., was brought back to Syria by Cretan condottieri, Ptolemy transferred his support and Cleopatra to the rightful heir. Alexander was defeated by Ptolemy at the battle of the Oenoparas near Antioch and murdered during his See also:flight. Ptolemy himself died of the See also:wound he had received in the battle.

End of Article: ANTIOCHUS III

Additional information and Comments

There are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click, and select "copy." Then paste it into your website, email, or other HTML.
Site content, images, and layout Copyright © 2006 - Net Industries, worldwide.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.

Links to articles and home page are always encouraged.

[back]
ANTIOCHUS I
[next]
ANTIOCHUS OF ASCALON (1st century B.C.)