Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
See also:ANTIOCHUS III . THE See also:GREAT (242-187), Callinicus's younger son, a youth of about eighteen, now succeeded to a disorganized See also:kingdom (223). Not only was See also:Asia See also:Minor detached, but the further eastern provinces had broken away, See also:Bactria under the See also:Greek See also:Diodotus (q.v.), and See also:Parthia under the See also:nomad chieftain See also:Arsaces. Soon after Antiochus's See also:accession, See also:Media and See also:Persis revolted under their See also:governors, the See also:brothers Molon and See also: The See also:campaigns of 219 and 218 carried the Seleucid arms almost to the confines of See also:Egypt, but in 217 See also:Ptolemy IV. confronted Antiochus at Raphia and inflicted a defeat upon him which nullified all Antiochus's successes and compelled him to withdraw See also:north of the See also:Lebanon. In 216 Antiochus went north to See also:deal with Achaeus, and had by 214 driven him from the See also: Antiochus seemed to have restored the Seleucid See also:empire in the east, and the achievement brought him the title of " the Great King." In 205/4 the See also:infant Ptolemy V. Epiphanes succeeded to the See also:Egyptian See also:throne, and Antiochus concluded a See also:secret pact with See also: By the peace of See also:Apamea (188) the Seleucid king abandoned all the See also:country north of the See also:Taurus, which was distributed among the See also:friends of Rome. As a consequence of this See also:blow to the Seleucid power, the outlying provinces of the empire, recovered by Antiochus, reasserted their independence. Antiochus perished in a fresh expedition to the east in Luristan (187). The Seleucid kingdom as Antiochus See also:left it to his son, SELEUCUS IV. PHILOPATOR (reigned 187-176), consisted of Syria (now including See also:Cilicia and Palestine), See also:Mesopotamia, Babylonia and Nearer See also:Iran (Media and Persis). Seleucus IV. was compelled by See also:financial necessities, created in part by the heavy See also:war-See also:indemnity exacted by Rome, to pursue an unambitious policy, and was assassinated by his minister See also:Heliodorus. The true See also:heir, Demetrius, son of Seleucus, being now retained in Rome as a See also:hostage, the kingdom was seized by the younger See also:brother of Seleucus, ANTIOCHUS IV. EPIPHANES (i.e. " the See also:Manifest [See also:god]"; parodied Epimanes, " the mad "), who reigned 176-164. In 170 Egypt, governed by regents for the boy Ptolemy Philometor, attempted to reconquer Palestine; Antiochus not only defeated this attempt but invaded and occupied Egypt. He failed to take See also:Alexandria, where the See also:people set up the younger brother of Philometor, Ptolemy Eurgetes, as king, but he left Philometor as his ally installed at See also:Memphis. When the two brothers combined, Antiochus again invaded Egypt (168), but was compelled to retire by the See also:Roman See also:envoy C. Popillius See also:Laenas (See also:consul 172), after the historic See also:scene in which the Roman See also:drew a circle in the See also:sand about the king and demanded his See also:answer before he stepped out of it. Antiochus exercised his contemporaries by the See also:riddles of his See also:half-brilliant, half-crazy See also:personality. He had resided at Rome as a hostage, and afterwards for his See also:pleasure at See also:Athens, and had brought to his kingdom an admiration for republican institutions and an See also:enthusiasm for Hellenic culture—or, at any See also:rate, for its externals. There is See also:evidence that the forms of Greek See also:political See also:life were more fully adopted under his sway by many of the Syrian cities. He spent lavishly on public buildings at See also:home and in the older centres of See also:Hellenism, like Athens. Gorgeous display and theatrical pomp were his delight. At the same See also:time he scandalized the See also:world by his riotous living and undignified familiarities. But he could persevere in an astute policy under the See also:cover of an easy geniality and had no scruples. It is his contact with the See also:Jews which has chiefly interested later ages, and he is doubtless the monarch described in the pseudo-prophetic chapters of See also:Daniel (q.v.). See also:Jerusalem, near the Egyptian frontier, was an important point, and in one of its See also:internal revolutions Antiochus saw, perhaps not without See also:reason, a defection to the Egyptian side. His chastisement of the See also:city, including as it did the spoliation of the See also:temple, served the additional purpose of relieving his financial necessities. It was a measure of a very different See also:kind when, a See also:year or two later (after 168), Antiochus tried to suppress the practices of Judaism by force, and it wasthis which provoked the Maccabaean rebellion (see See also:MACCABEES) . In 166 Antiochus left Syria to attempt the reconquest of the further provinces. He seems to have been signally. successful. Armenia returned to See also:allegiance, the capital of Media was re-colonized as Epiphanea, and Antiochus was pursuing his plans in the east when he died at Tabaein Persis, after exhibiting some sort of See also:mental derangement (See also:winter 164/3). He left a son of nine years, ANTIOCHUS V. EUPATOR (reigned 164-162), in whose name the kingdom was administered by a camarilla. Their government was feeble and corrupt. The attempt to check the Jewish rebellion ended in a weak See also:compromise. Their subservience to Rome so enraged the Greek cities of Syria that the Roman envoy Graeus Octavius (consul 165 B.e.) was assassinated in See also:Laodicea (162). At this juncture Demetrius, the son of Seleucus IV., escaped from Rome and was received in Syria as the true king. Antiochus Eupator was put to See also:death. DEMETRIUS I. See also:SOTER (reigned 162-150) was a strong and ambitious ruler. He crushed the rebellion of Timarchus in Media and reduced See also:Judaea to new subjection. But he was unpopular at See also:Antioch, and See also:fell before a See also:coalition of the three See also:kings of Egypt, Pergamum and Cappadocia. An impostor, who claimed to be a son of Antiochus Epiphanes, ALEXANDER B ALAS (reigned 150-145), was installed as king by Ptolemy Philometor and given Ptolemy's daughter See also:Cleopatra to wife, but Alexander proved to be dissolute and incapable, and when Demetrius, the son of Demetrius I., was brought back to Syria by Cretan condottieri, Ptolemy transferred his support and Cleopatra to the rightful heir. Alexander was defeated by Ptolemy at the battle of the Oenoparas near Antioch and murdered during his See also:flight. Ptolemy himself died of the See also:wound he had received in the battle. Additional information and CommentsThere are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click, and select "copy." Then paste it into your website, email, or other HTML. Site content, images, and layout Copyright © 2006 - Net Industries, worldwide. |
|
[back] ANTIOCHUS I |
[next] ANTIOCHUS OF ASCALON (1st century B.C.) |