Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
See also:BENGEL, JOHANN ALBRECHT (1687-1752) , Lutheran divine and See also:scholar, was See also:born at Winnenden in See also:Wurttemberg, on the 24th of See also:June 1687. His See also:father died in 1693, and Bengel was educated by a friend, who became a See also:master in the gymnasium at See also:Stuttgart. In 1703 Bengel See also:left Stuttgart and entered the university of See also:Tubingen, where, in his spare See also:time, he devoted himself specially to the See also:works of See also:Aristotle and See also:Spinoza, and in See also:theology to those of Philipp Spener, Johann See also:Arndt and See also:August Franke. His knowledge of the See also:metaphysics of Spinoza was such that he was selected by one of the professors to prepare materials for a See also:treatise De Spinosismo, which was afterwards published. After taking his degree, Bengel devoted himself to theology. Even at this time he had religious doubts; it is interesting in view of his later See also:work that one cause of his perplexities was the .difficulty of ascertaining the true See also:reading of certain passages in the See also:Greek New Testament. In 1707 Bengel entered the See also:ministry and was appointed to the parochial See also:charge of Metzingen-unter-Urach. In the following See also:year he was recalled to Tubingen to undertake the See also:office of Repetent or theological See also:tutor. Here he remained till 1713, when he was appointed See also:head of a See also:seminary recently established at Denkendorf as a preparatory school of theology. Before entering on his new duties he travelled through the greater See also:part of See also:Germany, studying the systems of See also:education which were in use, and visiting the seminaries of the See also:Jesuits as well as those of the Lutheran and Reformed churches. Among other places he went to See also:Heidelberg and See also:Halle, and had his See also:attention directed at Heidelberg to the canons of scripture See also:criticism published by See also:Gerhard von Mastricht, and at Halle to C. Vitringa's Anacrisis ad Apocalypsin. The See also:influence exerted by these upon his theological studies is See also:manifest in some of his works. For twenty-eight years—from 1713 to 1741—he was master (Klosterprdceptor) of the Klosterschule at Denkendorf, a seminary for candidates for the ministry established in a former monastery of the canons of the See also:Holy See also:Sepulchre. To these years, the See also:period of his greatest intellectual activity, belong many of his See also:chief works. In 1741 he was appointed See also:prelate (i.e. See also:General See also:Superintendent) at Herbrechtingen, where he remained till 1749, when he was raised to the dignity of consistorial counsellor and prelate of Alpirspach, with a See also:residence in Stuttgart. He now devoted himself to the See also:discharge of his duties as a member of the See also:consistory. A question of considerable difficulty was at that time occupying the attention of the See also: (A.) His edition of the Greek Testament was published at Tubingen in 1734, and at Stuttgart in the same year, but without the See also:critical apparatus. So See also:early as 1725, in an addition to his edition of See also:Chrysostom's De Sacerdotio, he had given an See also:account in his Prodromus Novi Testamenti Graeci recte cauteque adornandi of the principles on which his intended edition was to be based. In preparation for his work Bengel was able to avail himself of the collations of upwards of twenty See also:MSS., none of them, however, of See also:great importance, twelve of which had been collated by himself. In constituting the See also:text, he imposed upon himself the singular restriction of not inserting any various reading which had not already been printed in some preceding edition of the Greek text. From this See also:rule, however, he deviated in the See also:case of the See also:Apocalypse, where, owing to the corrupt See also:state of the text, he See also:felt himself at liberty to introduce certain readings on See also:manuscript authority. In the See also:lower margin of the See also:page he inserted a selection of various readings, the relative importance of which he denoted by the first five letters of the Greek See also:alphabet in the following manner:—a was employed to denote the reading which in his See also:judgment was the true one, although he did not venture to See also:place it in the text; 19, a reading better than that in the text; -y, one equal to the textual reading; S and e, readings inferior to those in the text. R. See also:Etienne's See also:division into verses was retained in the inner margin, but the text was divided into paragraphs. The text was followed by a critical apparatus, the first part of which consisted of an introduction to the criticism of the New Testament, in the See also:thirty-See also:fourth See also:section of which he laid down and explained his celebrated See also:canon, " Proclivi scriptioni praestat ardua " (" The difficult reading is to be preferred to that which is easy "), the soundness of which, as a general principle, has been recognized by succeeding critics. The second part of the critical apparatus was devoted to a See also:consideration of the various readings, and here Bengel adopted the See also:plan of stating the See also:evidence both against and in favour of a particular reading, thus placing before the reader the materials for forming a judgment. Bengel was the first definitely to propound the theory of families or recensions of MSS. His investigations had led him to see that a certain See also:affinity or resemblance existed amongst many of the authorities for the Greek text—MSS., versions, and ecclesiastical writers; that if a See also:peculiar reading, e.g., was found in one of these, it was generally found also in the other members of the same class; and this general relationship seemed to point ultimately to a See also:common origin for all the authorities which presented such peculiarities. Although
disposed at first to See also:divide the various documents into three classes, he finally adopted a See also:classification into two—the See also:African or older See also:family of documents, and the See also:Asiatic, or more See also:recent class, to which he attached only a subordinate value. The theory was afterwards adopted by J. S. See also:Semler and J. J. See also:Griesbach, and worked up into an elaborate See also:system by the latter critic. Bengel's labours on the text of the Greek Testament were received with great disfavour in many quarters. Like See also:Brian See also:Walton and See also: The text of Bengel See also:long enjoyed a high reputation among scholars, and was frequently reprinted. An enlarged edition of the critical apparatus was published by See also: Additional information and CommentsThere are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click, and select "copy." Then paste it into your website, email, or other HTML. Site content, images, and layout Copyright © 2006 - Net Industries, worldwide. |
|
[back] BENGAZI (anc. Hesperides-Berenice) |
[next] BENGUELLA (Sao Felipe de Benguella) |