Online Encyclopedia

Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.

RAINBOW

Online Encyclopedia
Originally appearing in Volume V22, Page 863 of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica.
Spread the word: del.icio.us del.icio.us it!

RAINBOW , formerly known as the See also:

iris, the coloured rings seen in the heavens when the See also:light from the See also:sun or See also:moon shines on falling See also:rain; on a smaller See also:scale they may be observed when See also:sunshine falls on the spray of a See also:waterfall or See also:fountain. The bows assume the See also:form of concentric circular arcs, having their See also:common centre on the See also:line joining the See also:eye of the observer to the sun. Generally only one See also:bow is clearly seen; this is known as the See also:primary rainbow; it has an angular See also:radius of about 410,and exhibits a See also:fine display of the See also:colours of the spectrum, being red on the outside and See also:violet on the inside. Sometimes an See also:outer bow, the secondary rainbow, is observed; this is much fainter than the primary bow, and it exhibits the same See also:play of colours, with the important distinction that the See also:order is reversed, the red being inside and the violet outside. Its angular radius is about 57°. It is also to be noticed that the space between the two bows is considerably darker than the See also:rest of the See also:sky. In addition to these prominent features, there are sometimes to be seen a number of coloured bands, situated at or near the summits of the bows, See also:close to the inner edge of the primary and the outer edge of the secondary bow; these are known as the See also:spurious, supernumerary or complementary rainbows. The formation of the rainbow in the heavens after or during a shower must have attracted the See also:attention of See also:man in remote antiquity. The earliest references are to be found in the various accounts of the See also:Deluge. In the Biblical narrative (Gen. ix. 12–17) the bow is introduced as a sign of the See also:covenant between See also:God and man, a figure without a parallel in the other accounts. Among the Greeks and See also:Romans various speculations as to the cause of the bow were indulged in; See also:Aristotle, in his Meteors, erroneously ascribes it to the reflection of the sun's rays by the rain; See also:Seneca adopted the same view.

The introduction of the See also:

idea that the phenomenon was caused by See also:refraction is to be assigned to Vitellio. The same conception was utilized by See also:Theodoric of Vriberg, a Dominican, who wrote at some See also:time between 1304 and 1311 a See also:tract entitled De radialibus impressionibus, in which he showed how the primary bow is formed by two refractions and one See also:internal reflection; i.e. the light enters the drop and is refracted; the refracted See also:ray is then reflected at the opposite See also:surface of the drop, and leaves the drop at the same See also:side at which it enters, being again refracted. It is difficult to determine the See also:influence which the writings of Theodoric had on his successors; his See also:works were apparently unknown until they were discovered by G. B. Venturi at See also:Basel, partly in the See also:city library and partly in the library of the Dominican monastery. A full See also:account, together with other See also:early contributions to the See also:science of light, is given in Venturi's Commentari sopra la storia de la Teoria del Ottica (See also:Bologna, 1814). See also:John See also:Fleischer (sometimes incorrectly named See also:Fletcher), of See also:Breslau, propounded the same view in a pamphlet, De iridibus doctrina Aristotelis et Vitellonis (1574); the same explanation was given by Franciscus Maurolycus in his Photismi de lumine et See also:umbra (1575)• The most valuable of all the earlier contributions to the scientific explanation of rainbows is undoubtedly a See also:treatise by Marco See also:Antonio de See also:Dominis (1566-1624), See also:archbishop of Spalatro. This See also:work, De radiis visas et lucis in vitris perspectivis et iride, published at See also:Venice in 1611 by J. See also:Bartolus, although written some twenty years previously, contains a See also:chapter entitled " See also:Vera iridis tota generatio explicatur," in which it is shown how the primary bow is formed by two refractions and one reflection, and the secondary bow by two refractions and two reflections. See also:Descartes strengthened these views, both by experiments and geometrical investigations, in his Meteors (See also:Leiden, 1637). He employed the See also:law of refraction (discovered by W. Snellius) to calculate the radii of the bows, and his theoretical angles were in agreement with those observed.

His methods, however, were not See also:

free from tentative assumptions, and were considerably improved by See also:Edmund See also:Halley (Phil. Trans., 1700, 714). Descartes, however, could advance no satisfactory explanation of the See also:chromatic displays; this was effected by See also:Sir See also:Isaac See also:Newton, who, having explained how See also:white light is composed of rays possessing all degrees of refrangibility, was enabled to demonstrate that the order of the colours was in perfect See also:accord with the requirements of theory (see Newton's Opticks, See also:book i. See also:part 2, prop. 9). The geometrical theory, which formed the basis of the investigations of Descartes and Newton, afforded no explanation of the supernumerary bows, and about a See also:century elapsed before an explanation was forthcoming. This was given by See also:Thomas See also:Young, who, in the Bakerian lecture delivered before the Royal Society on the 24th of See also:November 1803, applied his principle of the interference of light to this phenomenon. His not wholly satisfactory explanation was mathematically examined in 1835 by See also:Richard See also:Potter (Camb. Phil. Trans., 1838, 6, 141), who, while improving the theory, See also:left a more See also:complete See also:solution to be made in 1838 by Sir See also:George Biddell See also:Airy (Camb. Phil. Trans., 1838, 6, 379)• The geometrical theory first requires a See also:consideration of the path of a ray of light falling upon a transparent See also:sphere. Of the See also:total (See also:lea- amount of light falling on such a sphere, part is reflected or metrical scattered at the incident surface, so rendering the drop m visible, while a part will enter the drop.

Confining our t: ory. attention to a ray entering in a See also:

principal See also:plane, we will determine its deviation, i.e. the See also:angle between its directions of incidence and emergence, after one, two, three or more internal reflections. Let See also:EA be a ray incident at an angle i (fig. 1) ; let AD be the refracted ray, and r the angle of refraction. Then the deviation experienced by the ray at A is i—r. If the ray suffers one internal reflection at D, then it is readily seen that, if DB be the path of the reflected ray, the angle See also:ADB equals 27, i.e. the deviation of the ray at D is 7r-2r. At B, where the same as at A, viz. i—r. The total deviation of the ray is consequently given by D=2(i—r)+7r—2r. Similarly it may be shown that each internal reflection introduces a supplementary deviation of ,r—2r; hence, if the ray be reflected n times, the total deviation will be D=2(i—r)+n(~r—2r). The deviation is thus seen to vary with the angle of incidence; and by considering a set of parallel rays passing through the same principal plane of the sphere and incident at all angles, it can be readily shown that more rays will pass in the neighbourhood of the position of minimum deviation than in any other position (see REFRACTION). The drop will consequently be more intensely illuminated when viewed along these directions of minimum deviation, and since it is these rays with which we are primarily concerned, we shall proceed to the determination of these directions. Since the angles of incidence and refraction are connected by the,relation See also:sin i =µ sin r (See also:Snell's Law),µ being the See also:index of refraction of the See also:medium, then the problem may be stated as follows: to determine the value of the angle i which makes D =2(i—r)+n(7r—2r) a maximum or minimum, in which i and are connected by the relation sin i=µ sin r, µ being a See also:constant. By applying the method of the See also:differential calculus, we obtain See also:cos i=~{(µ2—I)/(n2+2n)) as the required value; it may be readily shown either geometrically or analytically that this is' a minimum.

For the angle i to be real, cos i must be a fraction, that is n2+2n>See also:

A2—1, or (n+I)2>i2. Since the value ofµ for See also:water is about t, it follows that n must be at least unity for a rainbow to be formed; there is obviously no theoretical limit to the value of n, and hence rainbows of higher orders are possible. So far we have only considered rays of homogeneous light, and it remains to investigate how See also:lights of varying refrangibilities will be transmitted. It can be shown, by the methods of the differential calculus or geometrically, that the deviation increases with the refractive index, the angle of incidence remaining constant. Taking the refractive index of water for the red rays as W, and for the violet rays as g?, we can calculate the following values for the minimum deviations corresponding to certain assigned values of n. Red. Violet. I 7r— 42°.1 7r— 40°.22 2 27r—129°•2 27r—125°•4~8p 3 37r—231°•4 31r -227°.08 4 47r—317°•07 47r—310°.07 To this point we have only considered rays passing through a principal See also:section of the drop; in nature, however, the rays impinge at every point of the surface facing the sun. It may be readily deduced that the directions of minimum deviation for a See also:pencil of parallel rays See also:lie on the surface of cones, the semi-See also:vertical angles of which are equal to the values given in the above table. Thus, rays suffering one internal reflection will all lie within a See also:cone of about 42°; in this direction the See also:illumination will be most intense; within the cone the illumination will be fainter, while, without it, no light will be transmitted to the eye. Fig. 2 represents sections of the drop and the cones containing the minimum deviation rays after I, 2, 3 and 4 reflections; the order of the colours is shown by the letters R (red) and V (violet).

It is apparent, therefore, that all drops transmitting intense light after one internal reflection to the eye will lie on the surfaces of cones having the eye for their common vertex, the line joining the eye to the sun for their See also:

axis, and their semi-vertical angles equal to about 41° for the violet rays and 43° for the red rays. The observer will,therefore, see a coloured See also:band, about 2° in width, and coloured violet inside and red outside. Within the band, the illumination Fro. 2 will be faint; outside the band there will be perceptible darkening until the second bow comes into view. Similarly, drops transmitting rays after two internal reflections will be situated on covertical and coaxial cones, of which the semi-vertical angles are 51° for the red rays and 54° for the violet. Outside the cone of 5¢r there will be faint illumination; within it, no secondary rays will be transmitted to the eye. We thus see that the order of colours in the secondary bow is the See also:reverse of that in the primary; the secondary is See also:half as broad again (3°), and is much fainter, owing to the longer path of the ray in the drop, and the increased See also:dispersion. Similarly, the third, See also:fourth and higher orders of bows may be investigated. The third and fourth bows are situated between the observer and the sun, and hence, to be viewed, the observer must See also:face the sun. But the illumination of the bow is so weakened by the repeated reflections, and the light of the sun is generally so See also:bright, that these bows are rarely, if ever, observed except in artificial rainbows. The same remarks apply to the fifth bow, which differs from the third and fourth in being situated in the same part of the sky as the primary and secondary bows, being just above the secondary. The most conspicuous See also:colour band of the principal bows is the red ; the other colours shading off into one another, generally with considerable blurring.

This is due to the superposition of a See also:

great number of spectra, for the sun has an appreciable apparent See also:diameter, and each point on its surface gives rise to an individual spectrum. This overlapping may become so pronounced as to produce a rain-bow in which colour is practically absent; this is particularly so when a thin See also:cloud intervenes between the sun and the rain, which has the effect of increasing the apparent diameter of the sun to as much as 2° or 3°. This phenomenon is known as the " white rainbow " or " Ulloa's See also:Ring or Circle," after Antonio de Ulloa. We have now to consider the so-called spurious bows which are sometimes seen at the inner edge of the primary and at the outer edge of the secondary bow. The geometrical theory can physkal afford no explanation of these coloured bands, and it has theory. been shown that the complete phenomenon of the rainbow is to be sought for in the conceptions of the See also:wave theory of light. This was first suggested by Thomas Young, who showed that the rays producing the bows consisted of two systems, which, although emerging in parallel directions, traversed different paths in the drop. Destructive interference between these superposed rays will there-fore occur, and, instead of a continuous maximum illumination in the direction of minimum deviation, we should expect to find alternations of brightness and darkness. The later investigations of Richard Potter and especially of Sir George Biddell Airy have proved the correctness of Young's idea. The mathematical discussion of Airy showed that the primary rainbow is not situated directly on the line of minimum deviation, but at a slightly greater value; this means that the true angular radius of the bow is a little less than that derived from the geometrical theory. In the same way, he showed that the secondary bow has a greater radius than that previously assigned to it. The spurious bows he showed to consist of a See also:series of dark and bright bands, whose distances from the principal bows vary with the diameters of the raindrops. The smaller the drops, the greater the distance; hence it is that the spurious bows are generally only observed near the summits of the bows, where the drops are smaller than at any See also:lower See also:altitude.

In Airy's investigation, and in the extensions by Boitel, J. Larmor, E. Mascart and L. Lorentz, the source of light was regarded as a point. In nature, however, this is not realized, for the sun has an appreciable diameter. Calculations taking this into account have been made by J. Pernter (Neues fiber den Regenbogen, See also:

Vienna, 1888) and by K. Aichi and T. Tanakadate (Jour. See also:College of Science, See also:Tokyo, 1906, vol. xxi. See also:art. 3). Experimental See also:confirmation of Airy's theoretical results was afforded in 1842 by See also:William Hallows See also:Miller (Camb.

Phil. Trans. vii. 277). A See also:

horizontal pencil of sunlight was admitted by a vertical slit, and then allowed tc fall on a See also:column of water supplied by a See also:jet of about -nth of an See also:inch in diameter. Primary, secondary and spurious bows were formed, and their radii measured; a comparison of these observations exhibited agreement with Airy's See also:analytical values. Pulfrich (Wied. See also:Ann., 1888, 33, 194) obtained similar results by using cylindrical See also:glass rods in See also:place of the column of water. In accordance with a See also:general consequence of reflection and refraction, it is readily seen that the light of the rainbow is partially polarized, a fact first observed in 1811 by See also:Jean See also:Baptiste See also:Biot (see POLARIZATION). Lunar rainbows. The moon can produce rainbows in the same manner as the sun. The colours are much fainter, and according to Aristotle, who claims to be the first observer of this phenomenon, the lunar bows are only seen when the moon is full. Marine rainbow is the name given to the chromatic displays formed by the sun's rays falling on the spray See also:drawn up by the See also:wind playing on the surface of an agitated See also:sea.

Intersecting rainbows are sometimes observed. They are formed by parallel rays of light emanating from two See also:

sources, as, for example, the sun and its See also:image in a See also:sheet of water, which is situated between the observer and the sun. In this See also:case the second bow is much fainter, and has its centre as much above the See also:horizon as that of the See also:direct See also:system is below it.

End of Article: RAINBOW

Additional information and Comments

There are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click, and select "copy." Then paste it into your website, email, or other HTML.
Site content, images, and layout Copyright © 2006 - Net Industries, worldwide.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.

Links to articles and home page are always encouraged.

[back]
RAIN (O.E. regn; the word is common to Teutonic lan...
[next]
RAINOLDS (or REYNOLDS), JOHN (1549-1607)