Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
ANALYTICAL See also:DYNAMIcs.—The fundamental principles of dynamics, and their application to See also:special problems, are explained in the articles See also:MECHANICS and See also:MOTION, See also:LAWS OF, where brief indications are also given of the more See also:general methods of investigating the properties of a dynamical See also:system, independently of the accidents of its particular constitution, which were inaugurated by J. L. See also:Lagrange. These methods, in addition to the unity and breadth which they have introduced into the treatment of pure dynamics, have a See also:peculiar See also:interest in relation to See also:modern See also:physical See also:speculation, which finds itself confronted in various directions with the problem of explaining on dynamical principles the properties of systems whose ultimate mechanism can at See also:present only be vaguely conjectured. In determining the properties of such systems the methods of analytical See also:geometry and of the infinitesimal calculus (or, more generally, of mathematical See also:analysis) are necessarily employed; for this See also:reason the subject has been named Analytical Dynamics. The following See also:article is devoted to an outline of such portions of general dynamical theory as seem to be most important from the physical point of view. 1. General Equations of Impulsive Motion. The systems contemplated by Lagrange are composed of discrete particles, or of rigid bodies, in finite number, connected (it may be) in various ways by invariable geometrical relations, the fundamental postulate being that the position of every particle of the system at any See also:time can be completely specified by means of the instantaneous values of a finite number of See also:independent variables gz,•••q,,, each of which admits of continuous variation over a certain range, so that if x, y, z be the Cartesian co-ordinates of any one particle, we have for example x=f(qi, y=&c., z=&c., . . (I) where the functions f differ (of course) from particle to particle. In modern See also:language, the variables q1, q2,...q„ are generalized co-ordinates serving to specify the configuration of the system; their derivatives with respect to the time are denoted by q1, gz,•••gn, and are called the generalized components of velocity. The continuous sequence of configurations assumed by the system in any actual or imagined motion (subject to the given connexions) is called the path. For the purposes of a connected outline of the whole subject it is convenient to deviate somewhat from the See also:historical See also:order of Impulsive development, and to begin with the See also:consideration of motton. impulsive motion. Whatever the actual motion of the system at any instant, we may conceive it to be generated instantaneously from See also:rest by the application of proper impulses. On this view we have, if x, y, z be the rectangular co-ordinates of any particle m, mi=X', my=Y', mz=Z', . . (2) where X', Y', Z' are the components of the impulse on m. Now let Sx, by, Sz be any infinitesimal See also:variations of x, y, z which are consistent with the connexions of the system, and let us See also:form the See also:equation Em(iSx+ySy+zaz)=Z(X'Sx+Y'Iy+Z'Sz), . (3) where the sign E indicates (as throughout this article) a summation extending over all the particles of the system. To transform (3) into an equation involving the variations Sq1, Sq2,••• of the generalized co-ordinates, we have x= a4ig+-q2+..., &c., &c. . Sx=— ql+See also:a4~Sqz+..., &c., &c., . aqi and therefore Em(iSx+yIy+z&z) =Augi+Ai2g2+...)Sqi +(A21gi+A22g2+.••)Sq2+•••, where Arr=Zm (ax 2+ (aqr/ 2+ \aqr/ 2 l A„=Em ax ax ay ay azaz =A I (7) OD. aqs+aqr aqs+aqr aq, J If we form the expression for the kinetic See also:energy T of the system, we find 2T=fm(i2+y2 +22) =A11g12 +A22422 +... +2Al2g1g2 +... (8) The coefficients An, A22,...Al2,... are by an obvious See also:analogy called the coefficients of inertia of the system; they are in general functions of the co-ordinates qi, 42,.... The equation (6) may now be written m(iax+ysy+zaz) =aq —OD + --442+ (9) This may be regarded as the See also:cardinal See also:formula in Lagrange's method. For the right-See also:hand See also:side of (3) we may write Z(X'Sx+Y'Sy+Z'Sz) =Q'ibgi+Q'2Sg2+ (io) where Q'r=~(X, ax+Y, ay+Z, az\ . (II) aqr aqr aqr The quantities Qi, Q2, • . are called the generalized components of impulse. Comparing (9) and (1o), we have, since the variations Sqi, Sq2,... are independent, aT=Q'1, aT=Q'2 ... (12) a4i aqz These are the general equations of impulsive motion. It is now usual to write pr=aq (13) The quantities Pi, P2,... represent the effects of the several component impulses on the system, and are therefore called the generalized components of momentum. In terms of them we have ~ni(tIx+yay+zaz) =piagi+P2Sg2+... (i4) Also, since T is a homogeneous quadratic See also:function of the velocities 41, q2..., 2T=pigi+P242+ ••. • (i5) This follows independently from (14), assuming the special variations Sx=idt, &c., and therefore SQ1-g1dt, SQ2=g2dt,... . Again, if the values of the velocities and the momenta in any other motion of the system through the same See also:con-figuration be distinguished by accents, we have the identity p1q'1+p2q'2+ ••• =p'141+p'242+...1 . (16) each side being equal to the symmetrical expression Angiq'i +A22424'z+... +Al2(414'2+4'142) +••• (i7) The theorem (16) leads to some important reciprocal relations. Thus, let us suppose that the momenta pi, p2,... all vanish with the exception of p1, and similarly that the momenta P'i, p'z,... all vanish except p'z. We have then piq'i=p'z4z, or qz: pi=q'1: p'z.. (18) The See also:interpretation is simplest when the co-ordinates qi, qz are both of the same See also:kind, e.g. both lines or both angles. We may then conveniently put Pi =P'2, and assert that the velocity of the first type due to an impulse of the second type is equal to the velocity of the second type due to an equal impulse of the first type. As an example, suppose we have a See also:chain of straight links hinged each to the next, extended in a straight See also:line, and See also:free to move. A See also:blow at right angles to the chain, at any point P, will produce a certain velocity at any other point Q; the theorem asserts that an equal velocity will be produced at P by an equal blow at Q. Again, an impulsive couple acting on any See also:link A will produce a certain angular velocity in any other link B ; an equal couple applied to B will produce an equal angular velocity in A. Also if an impulse F applied at P produce an angular velocity w in a link A, a couple Fa applied to A will produce a linear velocity wa at P. Historically, we may See also:note that reciprocal relations in dynamics were first recognized by H. L. F. See also:Helmholtz in the domain of See also:acoustics; their use has been greatly extended by See also:Lord See also:Rayleigh. The equations (13) determine the momenta p1, p2,... as linear functions of the velocities q2,••• . Solving these, we can See also:express qi, q2,..• as linear functions of Pi, A"... The resulpng Velocities equations give us the velocities produced by any given interms ol system of impulses. Further, by substitution in (8), momenta. we can express the kinetic energy as a homogeneous
quadratic function of the momenta pi, p2,.... The kinetic energy, as so expressed, will be denoted by T' ; thus
2T' =A'11p12+A'22p22+•••+2A'12p-P2+... . (i9)
where A'11, A'22, ••• A'12,... are certain coefficients depending on the configuration. They have been called by See also:Maxwell the coefficients of mobility of the system. When the form (19) is given, the values
. (6)
Reciprocal theorems.
of the velocities in terms of the momenta can be expressed in a remarkable form due to See also:Sir W. R. See also: = OT T' aT. aT aT' aT'
_ -Sq1+84--Sq2+... +aplplSplM p2Sp2+.... In virtue of (13) this reduces to
aT' aT'
41Sp1+42sp2+... =ap1Sp'+ap2Sp2+....
Since Bpi, 432,... may be taken to be independent, we infer that
aT' aT'
41=v, 42=dp2'
In the very remarkable exposition of the See also:matter given by See also: (24) These equations, when written out in full, determine X, X', i",••• as linear functions of 41, K, K', K", .. We now consider the function — K Y— (25) supposed expressed, by means of the above relations in terms of gl g2i... K, K, K",.... Performing the operation S on both sides of (25), we have a R ag S41+... I aKSK+...=-='ki+...+.=5X+... KaiXSK—..., (26) where, for brevity, only one See also:term of each type has been exhibited. Omitting the terms which See also:cancel in virtue of (24), we have aR . aR aT. a,8g1+...+aK SK+...=a41bg1+...-xSK- (27) Since the variations Sq,, Sq2,... Sq,,,, SK, SK, SK",... may be taken to be independent, we have aT aR aT aR __ pl a41 (TT: P2_a42=aQ2' •." (28) aR , aR " aR and x=—dK' x =—aK' X = (29) —aK .... An important See also:property of the present transformation is that, when expressed in terms of the new variables, the kinetic energy is the sum of two homogeneous quadratic functions, thus T = 6+K, . . . . (30) where 6 involves the velocities 41, 42,... 4m alone, and K the momenta K, K', K",... alone. For in virtue of (29) we have, from (25), aR ,aR 'aR T =R- (KaK +K UK +K lK+...) . (31) and it is evident that the terms in R which are bilinear in respect of the two sets of variables 41, 42,... 4m and K, K",... will dis- appear from the right-hand side. It may be noted that the formula (30) gives immediate See also:proof of two important theorems due to See also:Bertrand and to Lord Kelvin Maximum respectively. Let us suppose, in the first See also:place, that and the system is started by given impulses of certain types, minimum but is otherwise free. J. L. F. Bertrand's theorem is to energy. the effect that the kinetic energy is greater than if by impulses of the remaining types the system were con-strained to take any other course. We may suppose the co-ordinates to be so chosen that the constraint is expressed by the vanishing of the velocities 41, q2,•.• q>n, whilst the given impulses are K, K', K",... I-Ience the energy in the actual motion is greater than in the constrained motion by the amount 6. Again, suppose that the system is started with prescribed velocity components qi, q2,... 4, , by means of proper impulses of the corresponding types, but is otherwise free, so that in the motion actually generated we have K=o, K'=o, K"=o,... and therefore K=o. The kinetic energy is therefore less than in any other motion consistent with the prescribed velocity-conditions by the value which K assumes when K, K, K",... represent the impulses due to the constraints. See also:Simple illustrations of these theorems are afforded by the chain of straight links already employed. Thus if a point of the chain be held fixed, or if one or more of the See also:joints be made rigid, the energy generated by any given impulses is less than if the chain had possessed its former freedom. 2. Continuous Motion of a System. We may proceed to the continuous motion of a system. The equations of motion of any particle of the system are of the form m=X, nzy=Y, mz=Z . . . (I) Now let x+Sx, y+Sy, z+Sz be the co-ordinates of m in any Lagrange, arbitrary motion of the system differing infinitely little equations. from the actual motion, and let us form the equation Em(xSx+ySy+Sz) =E(XSx+YSy+ZSz) . (2) Lagrange's investigation consists in the transformation of (2) into an equation involving the independent variations Sql, Sq2,... Sq,. It is important to See also:notice that the symbols S and d/dt are commutative, since Sx =a (x+Sx) -ai =atsx, &c. Hence d Em(2ox+yoy+i8z) =atEm(J x+ySy+HSz) — Em(xSx+ySy+at) d =dt(p1Sg1+p2Sg2+...)—ST, . by § 1 (14). The last member may be written P1Sg1 +p1S41+P2Sg2 +P2642+... aT aT aT aT —a41Sq'—Q Sqi—aQ-Sg2—aQ"Sg2—... (5) Hence, omitting the terms which cancel in virtue of § I (13), we find See also:Im(zox+ysy+zHz) _ (Pi —a4) Sgi+ (1)2 —OQ2) 15q2+.... (6) For the right-hand side of (2) we have Z(XSx+YSy+ZSz) =Qlsg1+Q26g2+ where Q, = (Xag+1'aq +Za4) . (8) The quantities Qi, Q2,... are called the generalized components of force acting on the system. Comparing (6) and (7) we find aT aT P1—al=Q1, p2-aQ2=Q2, ..., or, restoring the values of pl, P2,••., d aT aT d aT OT dt (aQ1) —aq1= Ql, 7-it (a42) a - =Q2' Q2, These are Lagrange's general equations of motion. Their number is of course equal to that of the co-ordinates ql, q2,... to be deterrnined. Analytically, the above proof is that given by Lagrange, but the terminology employed is of much more See also:recent date, having been first introduced by Lord Kelvin and P. G. Tait; it has greatly promoted the physical application of the subject. Another proof of the equations (Io), by See also:direct transformation of co-ordinates, has been given by Hamilton and independently by other writers (see MECHANICS), but the variational method of Lagrange is that which stands in closest relation to the subsequent developments of the subject. The See also:chapter of Maxwell, already referred to, is a most instructive commentary on the subject from the physical point of view, although the proof there attempted of the equations (to) is fallacious. In a " conservative system " the See also:work which would have to be done by extraneous forces to bring the system from rest in some See also:standard configuration to rest in the configuration (qi, q2,... q,.) is independent of the path, and may therefore be regarded as a definite function of ql, q2,... q,. Denoting this function (the potential energy) by V, we have,- if there be no extraneous force on the system, Z(XSx+YSy+ZSz) _ . . . (II) and therefore av aV Q1 = - See also:j1' Q2 = -aQ2.. (21) (22) (23) (3) (4) (7) • (9) (to) 758 Hence the typical Lagrange's equation may be now written in the form d aT aT aV d CT) _aqr = aqr' pr = — , j—(V—T). (14) It has been proposed by Helmholtz to give the name kinetic potential to the See also:combination V—T. As shown under MECHANICS, § 22, we derive from (10) ddt =Q1g1+Q242+ (15) and therefore in the See also:case of a conservative system free from extraneous force, dt(T-f-V) =0 or T+V =const., . (16) which is the equation of energy. For examples of the application of the formula (13) see MECHANICS, § 22. 3. Constrained Systems. It has so far been assumed that the geometrical relations, if any, which exist between the various parts of the system are of the type § I (I), and so do not contain t explicitly. The See also:extension of Lagrange's equations to the case of " varying relations " of the type x=.f(t, qi, g2,...gn), y=&c., z=&c., was made by J. M. L. Vieille. We now have Ox ax . ax. x=at+aglgl+aQ242+..., &c., &c., (2) ax=aglSQlaQ2Sg2+., &c., &c., . (3) so that the expression § I (8) for the kinetic energy is to be replaced by 2T=ao+2ai41+2a242+••.+An412+A22422+...+Al24142+..., (4) where ao = zm (at) 2+ (i) 2+ (at) 2 ax ax ay ay Oz az tt `,. _ Zm at aqr+at aqr+at aqr and the forms of Arr, A,. are as given by § I (7). It is to be re-membered that the coefficients ao, a1, See also:a2, ...An, A22,... Al2... will in general involve t explicitly as well as implicitly through the co-ordinates qi, g2.... Again, we find F.m(xSx+ysy+2Sz) = (al+A11 1+Al242+...)&qi + (a2+Az141+A2242+...)aq2+... OT, q1+aq = Sq2+.. =pAbg1+p2Sg2+ (6) where p,. is defined as in § I (13). The derivation of Lagrange's equations then follows exactly as before. It is to be noted that the equation § 2 (15) does not as a See also:rule now hold. The proof involved the See also:assumption that T is a homogeneous quadratic function of the velocities 41, 42.... It has been pointed out by R. B. See also:Hayward that Vieille's case can be brought under Lagrange's by introducing a new co-See also:ordinate (x) in place of t, so far as it appears explicitly in the relations (I). We have then 2T=a.42+2(a142+a242+...)x+A11412+A22422+...+2Al24142+.... (7) The equations of motion will be as in § 2 (TO), with the additional equation and dt{{I+m(x2+y2)}+m(xy—yx)]=I.. . . (13) If we suppose adjusted so as to maintain ¢=o, or (again) if we suppose the moment of inertia I to be infinitely See also:great, we obtain the See also:familiar equations of motion relative to moving axes, viz. m(2—2wy—w2x) =X, m(/+2wx—w2y) =Y, mz=Z, . (14) where co has been written for 4. These are the equations which we should have obtained by applying Lagrange's rule at once to the formula 2T =m(x2+y2+z2)+2mw(xy—y±)+mw2(x2+y2), . (15) which gives the kinetic energy of the particle referred to axes rotating with the See also:constant angular velocity w. (See MECHANICS, § 13.) More generally, let us suppose that we have a certain See also:group of co-ordinates x, x', x",••. whose See also:absolute 'values do not affect the expression for the kinetic energy, and that by suitable forces of the corresponding types the velocity-components X, X', X",••• are maintained constant. The remaining co-ordinates being denoted by q1, qz,... q,,, we may write 2T=6+To+2(a141+a242+•••)Ji+2(x'141+x242+•••)X +..., (16) where is a homogeneous quadratic function of the velocities 41, 4z,•..Qn of the type §i (8), whilst To is a homogeneous quadratic function of the velocities k, X , i",••• alone. The remaining terms, which are bilinear in respect of the two sets of velocities, are indicated more fully. The formulae (Io) of § 2 give n equations of the type d a6 aro aTo -di aqr -aqr+(r, 1)41+(r, 2)42+...-aqr =Qr (17) where See also:Aar See also:act.. aa'r Oa', (r, s) _ (aqa— aqr ) x+ (aqg -aqr z'+.... These quantities (r, s) are subject to the relations (r, s) _ — (s, r), (r, r) =o. (19) The remaining dynamical equations, equal in number to the co-ordinates x, x', x", yield expressions for the forces which must be applied in order to maintain the velocities z, i",••• constant; they need not be written down. If we follow the method by which the equation of energy was established in § 2, the equations (17) See also:lead, on taking See also:account of the relations (19), to a(6—To)=QIgl+Q242+... Qngn,. or, in case the forces Qr depend only on the co-ordinates q1, q2,..•q„ and are conservative, 6+V —To = cont. . . . (21) The conditions that the equations (17) should be satisfied by zero values of the velocities 41, 42,...4. are &To Qr=-aqr, or in the case of conservative forces i.e. the value of V —To must be stationary. We may apply this to the case of a system whose configuration relative to axes rotating with constant angular velocity ((a) is defined by means of the n co-ordinates qi, q ,...q,. This is important on account of its bearing on the kinetic theory of the tides. Since the Cartesian co-ordinates x, y, z of any particle m of the system relative to the moving axes are functions of qi, q2,...q,,, of the form § i (I), we have, by (15) 26=Em(.x2+2+22), 2To=w2Em(x2+y2), (24) a, -= Em (See also:Hay —yax) (25) agr aqr ' (r, s) =2w.Zma ax, y ,g 4* (26) The conditions of relative See also:equilibrium are given by (23). It will be noticed that this expression V—To, which is to be stationary, differs from the true potential energy by a term which represents the potential energy of the system in relation to fictitious " centrifugal forces." The question of stability of relative equilibrium will be noticed later (§ 6). It should be observed that the remarkable formula (20) may in the present case be obtained directly as follows. From (15) and (14) we find a =-(6+To)+w.Zm(xy-yx) =dt(6-To)+w.Z(xY-yX). (27) (13) or, again, Case of varying relations. (I) d aT_aT=X, (8) dt az ax where X is the force corresponding to the co-ordinate x. We may suppose X to be adjusted so as to make x=o, and in the remaining equations nothing is altered if we write t for x before, instead of after, the differentiations. The reason why the equation § 2 (15) no longer holds is that we should require to add a term Xi on the right-hand side; this represents the See also:rate at which work is being done by the constraining forces required to keep constant. As an example, let x, y, z be the co-ordinates of a particle relative to axes fixed in a solid which is free to rotate about the See also:axis of z. If 42 be the angular co-ordinate of the solid, we find without difficulty 2T =m(x2+y2+22)+2cim(xy—y±)+{I+m(x2+y2)}0, . (9) where I is the moment of inertia of the solid. The equations of motion, viz. d aT aT d aT aT d aT aT I dr a`x —ax =X, d ay —ay =Y, at a - Oz =Z, (o) d aT aT dta -ad) 43, . and become m(—2 y—x0—y4i)=X, m(/+2c—yci2+xci)=Y, mz=Z,(12) (18) (20) (22) (23) Rotating axes. whence This must be equal to the rate at which the forces acting on the system do work, viz. to wE(xY-yX)+Q1g1+Q2g2+ ••• +Q4., where the first term represents the work done in virtue of the rotation. We have still to notice the modifications which Lagrange's equations undergo when the co-ordinates qi, q2,•••q, are not all independently variable. In the first place, we may suppose them connected by a number m (<a) of relations of the type A(t, q1, q2, ...q,.) =0, B(t, q1, q2, ... qn) =0, &c. (28) These may be interpreted as introducing partial constraints into a previously free system. The variations Sq1, 3g2r...6gn in the expressions (6) and (7) of § 2 which are to be equated are no longer independent, but are subject to the relations OA Sq1+a4 bq2+... =0, aq q1+a4 SQ2+ ... =0, &c. (29) Introducing indeterminate multipliers A, µ,..., one for each of these equations, we obtain in the usual manner n equations of the type d aT d aq - OT = Qr+aa4 + aq +... , . (30) in place of § 2 (to). These equations, together with (28), serve to determine the n co-ordinates q1, q2, ... q and the m multipliers When t does not occur explicitly in the relations (28) the system is said to be holonomic. The term connotes the existence of integral (as opposed to See also:differential) relations between the co-ordinates, independent of the time. Again, it may happen that although there are no prescribed relations between the co-ordinates q1, g2,••.Qn, yet from the circumstances of the problem certain geometrical conditions are imposed on their variations, thus Aiog1+A2bg2+ ... =o, Bibgi+B2Sg2+ ... =o, &c., (31) where the coefficients are functions of q1, q2,...q, and (possibly) of t. It is assumed that these equations are not integrable as regards the variables 0, g2,..•q,.; otherwise, we fall back on the previous conditions. Cases of the present type arise, for instance, in See also:ordinary dynamics when we have a solid See also:rolling on a (fixed or moving) See also:surface. The six co-ordinates which serve to specify the position of the solid at any instant are not subject to any necessary relation, but the conditions to be satisfied at the point of contact impose three conditions of the form (31). The general equations of motion are obtained, as before, by the method of indeterminate multipliers, thus d aT aT =Qr+xAr+uB.+ (32) dt 8q, aq,. The co-ordinates q1, q2, • • • q,., and the indeterminate multipliers A, µ,... , are determined by these equations and by the velocity-conditions corresponding to (31). When t does not appear explicitly in the coefficients, these velocity-conditions take the forms A1g1+A242+..•=o, B1g1+B242+...=0, &c. (33) Systems of this kind, where the relations (31) are not integrable, are called non-holonomic. 4. Hamiltonian Equations of Motion. In the Hamiltonian form of the equations of motion of a conservative system with unvarying relations, the kinetic energy is supposed expressed in terms of the momenta p1, p2, ... and the co-ordinates qi, q2,.... as in § I (19). Since the See also:symbol b now denotes a variation extending to the co-ordinates as well as to the momenta, we must add to the last member of § I (21) terms of the types aT aT' aqi +—Sq1+ ... . ay]. aq1 Since the variations bpi, Sp2, ... Sq1, SQ2i ... may be taken to be independent, we infer the equations § I (23) as before, together with aT aT' aT aT' (2) aqi -aQ1 , aQ2 = —a4~ ... Hence the Lagrangian equations § 2 (14) transform into aqi aq2 If we write H=T'+V, . (4) so that H denotes the See also:total energy of the system, supposed expressed in terms of the new variables, we get aH . aH p1 = - aql, p2 = --Q2 If to these we join the equations aH aH q1 = apip1. q2 =ap2, ..., which follow at once from § 1 (23), since V does not involve pi, Y2, ..., we obtain a See also:complete system of differential equations of the first order for the determination of the motion. The equation of energy is verified immediately by (5) and (6), since these make dH OH . aH . aH aH . ac ap1~'1+ap2t'2+...+aq q1+ag2g2+... O. The Hamiltonian transformation is extended to varying relations as follows. Instead of (4) we write H =1516.+p242+... —T+V, (8) and imagine H to be expressed in terms of the momenta P1, p2, ..., the co-ordinates qi, q2, ..., and the time. The See also:internal forces of the system are assumed to be conservative, with the potential energy V. Performing the variation a on both sides, we find aT +a aV Iq+ (9) SH =g1Sp1+... —aQ1Sg1gl ..., . terms which cancel in virtue of the See also:definition of p1, p2,... being omitted. Since 5p1, Sp2, SQ2r ... may be taken to be independent, we infer and a (T—V)=—aH a CT—V)= aH aq1 aQ1, aq2 —aQ2,.... It follows from (II) that OH aH PI=-aq1, 232=—aqt, ... . The equations (to) and (12) have the same form as above, but H is no longer equal to the energy of the system. 5. Cyclic Systems. A cyclic or gyrostatic system is characterized by the following properties. In the first place, the kinetic energy is not affected if we alter the absolute values of certain of the co-ordinates, which we will denote by x, x', x'',..„ provided the remaining co-ordinates qi, q2, •.. q,n and the velocities, including of course the velocities X, unaltered. Secondly, there are no forces acting on the system of the types x, x',x", ••• • This case arises, for example, when the system includes gyrostats which are free to rotate about their axes, the co-ordinates x, x'> x",••.then being the angular co-ordinates of the gyrostats relatively to their frames. Again, in theoretical See also:hydrodynamics we have the problem of moving solids in a frictionless liquid ; the ignored co-ordinates x, x', x" , ••. then refer to the fluid, and are See also:infinite in number. The same question presents itself in various physical speculations where certain phenomena are ascribed to the existence of latent motions in the ultimate constituents of matter. The general theory of such systems has been treated by E. J. Routh, Lord Kelvin, and H. L. F. Helmholtz. If we suppose the kinetic energy T to be expressed, as in Lagrange's method, in terms of the co-ordinates and Routh', the velocities, the equations of motion corresponding equations. to x, x', x", . reduce, in virtue of the above hypotheses, to the forms d aT=o d aT _~ d aT d OX aX =o , , d aX whence aT aT , aT (2) X =K, K, aX,l=K , where K, K', K", .. are the constant momenta corresponding to the cyclic co-ordinates x, x', .... These equations are linear in x, x', X", • . ; solving them with respect to these quantities and substituting in the remaining Lagrangian equations, we obtain m differential equations to determine the remaining co-ordinates qi, q2, ... qm• The See also:object of the present investigation is to ascertain the general form of the resulting equations. The retained co-ordinates q1, Q2, ... q+n may be called (for distinction) the palpable co-ordinates of the system; in many See also:practical questions they are the only co-ordinates directly in See also:evidence. If, as in § I (25), we write R=T—KX—K'X'—K"X"—..., (3) and imagine R to be expressed by means of (2) as a quadratic function of Qt, q2, •.. 4m, K, K', K", ... with coefficients which are in general functions of the co-ordinates q1, q2, ..• q,, then, performing the operation S on both sides, we find OR, . aR OR aT aT aQ1g1 +...+ as SK+... +ag1Q1Sg1+... = aQ1og1+...+aQ1bg1+... aT aT +a-XSX+...+aX1Sg1+...—KSX—XSK—.... (4) Con-strained systems. . (I) (3) (5) . (6) • (7) the case of aH OH 41=See also:apt, q2=ap2, •••r . (II) . (12) (I) 760 Omitting the terms which cancel by (2), we find aT aR aT aR 4941=4941 4942 =aye, .. , aT aR aT OR 4941=aQ1, 4942 =aq2, ... , OR , aR " aR X = -aK, X =-a ,, X =-aK",... Substituting in § 2 (to), we have See also:daR aR daR aR dt aql aql =Q' ' dt 494- aq2 =Q2, ... These are Routh's forms of the modified Lagrangian equations. See also:Equivalent forms were obtained independently by Helmholtz at a later date. The function R is made up of three parts, thus R=See also:R2,0+R1,1+R02, . . (9) where R;,o is a homogeneous quadratic function of 41, 42,...4m, Ro,2 is a homogeneous quadratic function of x, K, K",..., whilst R1,1 consists of products of the velocities 41, 42,..4. into the momenta K, x', K".... Hence from (3) and (7) we T=R— (Ka +K~R+K"a +...) = R2,o — R0,2. If, as in § t (30), we write this in the form T=+K, then (3) may be written R = IJ y R R - K+$141+$242+..., (I2) where $1, $2,... are linear functions of K, K', K",..., say Nr = a,.K+a',K'+ere' +.. . (13) the coefficients as, a„ a",,... being in general functions of the co-ordinates q1, q2,... q,,. Evidently $r denotes that See also:part of the momentum-component aR/494, which is due to the cyclic motions. Now d OR =d (See also:ate+$r) —d a +494"41+aRr42+ (14) dt dt a4r dt a a 1 aq2 OR 496 OK 49$1. al%. aqr =aqr —aqr +agrgl +agrg2+... Hence, substituting in (8), we obtain the typical equation of motion of a gyrostatic system in the form d O6 a6 d a -a+ (r, 1)11+(r, 2)42+...+(r, s)4e+...+asKr =Qr, (16) where 4949, OS, (r, s) =a—q..—a- ag- -a4-.. (17) This form is due to Lord Kelvin. When q1, q2,... gm have been determined, as functions of the time, the velocities corresponding to the cyclic co-ordinates can be found, if required, from the relations (7), which may be written aK x = aK -49141-49242-..., aK hh X'=aK -49'141-a'212 -..., &c., &c. It is to be particularly noticed that (r, r) = o, (r, s) = — (s, r). . . (19) Hence, if in (16) we put r=1, 2, 3,... m, and multiply by 41, 42,... 4m respectively, and add, we find dt(6+K) =Q141+Q242+..., or,'in the case of a conservative system 6+V+K=cont., . . (21) which is the equation of energy. The equation (16) includes § 3 (17) as a particular case, the eliminated co-ordinate being the angular co-ordinate of a rotating solid having an infinite moment of inertia. In the particular case where the cyclic momenta K, IC', K",... are all zero, (16) reduces to See also:dam a~ dt 494, aqr =Qr. The form is the same as in § 2, and the system now behaves, as regards the co-ordinates q1, q2,... q,,,, exactly like the acyclic type there contemplated. These co-ordinates do not, however, now See also:fix the position of every particle of the system. For example, if by suitable forces the system be brought back to its initial con- figuration (so far as this is defined by q1, q2,... q,,), after performing any evolutions, the ignored co-ordinates x, x', x",... will not in general return to their See also:original values. If in Lagrange's equations § 2 (to) we See also:reverse the sign of the time-See also:element dt, the equations are unaltered. The motion is therefore reversible; that is to say, if as the system is passing through any configuration its velocities qi, q2,... qm be all reversed, it will (if the forces be the same in the same configuration) retrace its former path. But it is important to observe that the statement does not in general hold of a gyrostatic system; the terms of (16), which are linear in 41, q2,... See also:change sign with dt, whilst the others do not. Hence the motion of a gyrostatic system is not reversible, unless indeed we reverse the cyclic motions as well as the velocities 41, q2,... D.. For instance, the precessional motion of a See also:top cannot be reversed unless we reverse the spin. The conditions of equilibrium of a system with latent cyclic motions are obtained by putting q1=o, q2=o,... ¢,,,=o in (16); viz. they are aK aK Q1 =a—Q1, Q2 =aq2 These may of course be obtained independently. Thus if the system be guided from (apparent) rest in the configuration (ql, q2,... q,,,) to rest in the configuration (gi+Sg1, q2+Sg2,...q,,,+sqm), the work done by the forces must be equal to the increment of the kinetic energy. Hence (Mgr +Q2642+... =SK, . (24) which is equivalent to (23). The conditions are the same as for the equilibrium of a system without latent motion, but endowed with potential energy K. This is important from a physical point of view, as showing how energy which is apparently potential may in its ultimate essence be kinetic. By means of the formulae (18), which now reduce to aK , aK " aK X = .aK , X =49K , x =See also:ale, (25) K may also be expressed as a homogeneous quadratic function of the cyclic velocities x, X', X,.... Denoting it in this form by To, we have S(To+K) =25K =S(KX+K )'c'+K"X"+...) . . (26) Performing the variations, and omitting the terms which cancel by (2) and (25), we find aTo_ aK aTo OK 49Q1 — 49g1' 4942 — 4942, so that the formulae (23) become aTo aTo Q1=—4941, Q2=—aQ2, (28) A simple example is furnished by the top (MECHANICS, § 22). The cyclic co-ordinates being 4, we find 2—A92, 2K=(a—v See also:cos fi)2 v2 A See also:sin 2B +C ' 2To=A sin2B +C(~+ cos 0)2, . (29) whence we may verify that aT0/00= —aK/a0 in accordance with (27). And the See also:condition of equilibrium aK aV 4949 =00 gives the condition of steady precession. 6. Stability of Steady Motion. The small oscillations of a conservative system about a con-figuration of equilibrium, and the criterion of stability, are discussed in MECHANICS, § 23. The question of the stability of given types of motion is more difficult, owing to the want of a sufficiently general, and at the same time precise, definition of what we mean by "stability." A number of See also:definitions which have been propounded by different writers are examined by F. See also:Klein and A. See also:Sommerfeld in their work Uber See also:die Theorie See also:des Kreisels (1897-1903). Rejecting previous definitions, they See also:base their criterion of stability on the See also:character of the changes produced in the path of the system by small arbitrary disturbing impulses. If the undisturbed path be the limiting form of the disturbed path when the impulses are indefinitely diminished, it is said to be See also:stable, but not otherwise. For instance, the See also:vertical fall of a particle under gravity is reckoned as stable, although for a given impulsive disturbance, however small, the deviation of the particle's position at any time t from the position which it would have occupied in the original motion increases indefinitely with t. Even this criterion, as the writers quoted themselves recognize, is not free from See also:ambiguity unless the phrase ",limiting form," as applied to a path, be strictly defined. It appears, moreover, that a definition which is analytically precise may not in all cases be easy to reconcile with geometrical prepossessions. Thus a particle moving in a circle about a centre of force varying inversely as the See also:cube of the distance will if slightly disturbed either fall into the centre, or recede to infinity, after describing in either case a See also:spiral with an infinite number of . (8) Kelvin's equations. have . (15) . (20) . (22) Kinetostatics. . (23) • (27) . (30) convolutions. Each of these spirals has, analytically, the circle as its limiting form, although the motion in the circle is most naturally described as unstable. A special form of the problem, of great interest, presents itself in the steady motion of a gyrostatic system, when the non-eliminated co-ordinates qi, q2, ... q,0 all vanish (see § 5). This has been discussed by Routh, Lord Kelvin and Tait, and See also:Poincare. These writers treat the question, by an extension of Lagrange's method, as a problem of small oscillations. Whether we adopt the notion of stability which this implies, or take up the position of Klein and Sommerfeld, there is no difficulty in showing that stability is ensured if V+K be a minimum as regards variations of qi, qz,... q„,. The proof is the same as that of Dirichlet for the case of statical stability. We can illustrate this condition from the case of the top, where, in our previous notatiom, z z V+K=MghcosO+(2Asin B +2C' (I) To examine whether the steady motion with the centre of gravity vertically above the See also:pivot is stable, we must put u = v. We then find without difficulty that V+K is a minimum provided v2>_4AMgh. The method of small oscillations gave us the condition v2>4AMgh, and indicated instability in the cases v2c4AMgh. The present criterion can also be applied to show that the steady precessional motions in which the axis has a constant inclination to the vertical are stable. The question remains, as before, whether it is essential for stability that V+K should be a minimum. It appears that from the point of view of the theory of small oscillations it is not essential, and that there may even be stability when V+K is a maximum. The precise conditions, which are of a somewhat elaborate character, have been formulated by Routh. An important distinction has, however, been established by See also:Thomson and Tait, and by Poincare, between what we may See also:call ordinary or temporary stability (which is stability in the above sense) and permanent or See also:secular stability, which means stability when regard is had to possible dissipative forces called into See also:play whenever the co-ordinates qi, q2,... q,, vary. Since the total energy of the system at any instant is given (in the notation of § 5) by an expression of the form 6+V+K, where 5 cannot be negative, the argument of Thomson and Tait, given under MECHANICS, § 23, for the statical question, shows that it is a necessary as well as a sufficient condition for secular stability that V+K should be a minimum. When a system is " ordinarily " stable, but " secularly " unstable, the operation of the frictional forces is to induce a See also:gradual increase in the See also:amplitude of the free vibrations which are called into play by accidental disturbances. There is a similar theory in relation to the constrained systems considered in § 3 above. The equation (21) there given leads to the conclusion that for secular stability of any type of motion in which the velocities qi, qz, ... 4s are zero it is necessary and sufficient that the function V—To should be a minimum. The simplest possible example of this is the case of a particle at the lowest point of a smooth spherical bowl which rotates with constant angular velocity (w) about the vertical See also:diameter. This position obviously possesses " ordinary " stability. If a be the See also:radius of the bowl, and 8 denote angular distance from the lowest point, we have V—To=mga(1—cos 0)—amw2a2 sin' 0; (2) this is a minimum for B =o only so See also:long as See also:w2 <g/a. For greater values of w the only position of " permanent " stability is that in which the particle rotates with the bowl at an angular distance cos'1(g/w2a) from the lowest point. To examine the motion in the neighbourhood of the lowest point, when frictional forces are taken into account, we may take fixed ones, in a See also:horizontal See also:plane, through the lowest point. Assuming that the See also:friction varies as the relative velocity, we have z= —p2x—k(x+wy), y= —ply—k(y—wx), where p'-=g/a. These combine into z+ki+(p2-ikw)z =o, where z=x+iy, i=,I—1. Assuming z=See also:Gem, we find X=—zk(I=w/p)r rip, . if the square of k be neglected. The complete See also:solution is then x+iy=Cie t3ttewt+C2e R2'e—wt, . (6) where t,=Zk(I—w/p), 132=ik(I+w/p). (7) This represents two superposed circular vibrations, in opposite directions, of See also:period 27r/p. If is <p, the amplitude of each of these diminishes asymptotically to zero, and the position x=o, y=o is permanently stable. But if w>p the amplitude of that circular vibration which agrees in sense with the rotation w will continually increase, and the particle will work its way in an ever-widening spiral path towards the See also:eccentric position of secular stability. If the bowl be not spherical but ellipsoidal, the vertical diameter being a See also:principal axis, it may easily be shown that the lowest position is permanently stable only so long as the period of the rotation is longer than that of the slower of the two normal modes in the See also:absence of rotation (see MECHANICS, § 13). 7. Principle of Least See also:Action. The preceding theories give us statements applicable to the system at any one instant of its motion. We now come to a See also:series of theorems See also:relating to the whole motion of the system Stationary between any two configurations through which it passes, action, viz. we consider the actual motion and compare it with other imaginable motions, differing infinitely little from it, between the same two configurations. We use the symbol S to denote the transition from the actual to any one of the hypothetical motions. The best-known theorem of this class is that of Least Action, originated by P. L. M. de See also:Maupertuis, but first put in a definite form by Lagrange. The " action " of a single particle in passing from one position to another is the space-integral of the momentum, or the time-integral of the vis viva. The action of a dynamical system is the sum of the actions of its constituent particles, and is accordingly given by the formula A=E f mvds=E f mv2dt=2f Tdt. . . The theorem referred to asserts that the free motion of a conservative system between any two given configurations is characterized by the property 3A =o, (2) provided the total energy have the same constant value in the varied motion as in the actual motion. If t, t' be the times of passing through the initial and final con-figurations respectively, we have SA = a f` Em(2+5,2+2)dt =2f STdt+2T'St'—2TSt,. . (3) t since the upper and See also:lower Iimits of the integral must both be regarded as variable. This may be written SA= t STdt+ ti , t ` Em(i8i+yay+zaz)dt+2T'St'—2TSt =f `,STdt+ [Em (x&x+jIby+ibz )] — f rt, (4) Em(Sx+ySy+2Iz)dt+2T'St'—2TSt. • t (5) Now, by d'See also:Alembert's principle, Em(zax+yby+zaz) = - SV, and by See also:hypothesis we have (6) S(T+V) =0. The formula therefore reduces to (7) SA = [Em(x8x+y&y+z5z)] `'+2T'Si'—2TSt. t . Since the terminal configurations are unaltered, we must have at the lower limit Sx+xlt=o, Sy+y3t=o, Sz+z&t=o, . . (8) with similar relations at the upper limit. These reduce (7) to the form (2). The equation (2), it is to be noticed, merely expresses that the variation of A vanishes to the first order; the phrase stationary action has therefore been suggested as indicating more accurately what has been proved. The action in the free path between two given configurations is in fact not invariably a minimum, and even when a minimum it need not be the least possible subject to the given conditions. Simple illustrations are furnished by the case of a single particle. A particle moving on a smooth surface, and free from extraneous force, will have its velocity constant; hence the theorem in this case resolves itself into See also:aids =O,. . . (9) i.e. the path must be a geodesic line. Now a geodesic is not necessarily the shortest path between two given points on it; for ex-ample, on the See also:sphere a great-circle arc ceases to be the shortest path between its extremities when it exceeds 180°. More generally, taking any surface, let a point P, starting from 0, move along a geodesic; this geodesic will be a minimum path from 0 to P until P passes through a point 0' (if such exist), which is the intersection with a consecutive geodesic through O. After this point the mini-mum property ceases. On an anticlastic surface two geodesics cannot intersect more than once, and each geodesic is therefore a minimum path between any two of its points. These illustrations are due to K. G. J. See also:Jacobi, who has also formulated the general criterion, applicable to all dynamical systems, as follows: Let O and P denote any two configurations on a natural path of the system. If this be the See also:sole free path from 0 to P with the prescribed amount of energy, the action from 0 to P is a minimum. But if (5) . (I) 762 there be several distinct paths, let P vary from coincidence with 0 along the first-named path; the action will then cease to be a minimum when a configuration 0' is reached such that two of the possible paths from 0 to 0' coincide. For instance, if 0 and P be positions on the parabolic path of a projectile under gravity, there will be a second path (with the same energy and therefore the same velocity of See also:projection from 0), these two paths coinciding when P is at the other extremity (0', say) of the See also:focal chord through O. The action from 0 to P will therefore be a minimum for all positions of P See also:short of 0'. Two configurations such as 0 and 0' in the general statement are called conjugate kinetic foci. Cf. Additional information and CommentsThere are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click, and select "copy." Then paste it into your website, email, or other HTML. Site content, images, and layout Copyright © 2006 - Net Industries, worldwide. |
|
[back] ANALYTIC (the adjective of " analysis," q.v.) |
[next] ANAMALAI HILLS |