Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
See also:RENAISSANCE See also:ARCHITECTURE IN See also:GERMANY
The classical revival does not seem to have taken See also:root in Germany much before the See also:middle of the 16th See also:century, some See also:forty to fifty years later than in See also:France, from which See also:country it is said to have been introduced, and in some of the See also:early See also:work there is a See also:great similarity to See also:French examples, but without the refinement and variety of detail which one finds in the chateaux of the See also:Loire and in many of the French towns. In the See also:rood-See also:screen of the See also:cathedral at See also:Hildesheim (1546), the See also:court of the See also:town See also: This same influence shows itself in the courtyard of the town hall at See also:Nuremberg, where the arcades of the two upper storeys might be taken for those of the courts of the palaces at See also:Rome. Amongst other 16th-century work there are two entrance See also:gates at See also:Danzig, the Hohe Tor (1588), a See also:fine massive structure, and the Langgasse Tor (1600), more or less pure Italian in style. At See also:Augsburg, the See also:arsenal (1603–1607), by the architect See also:Elias Hoff (1573–1646), is of a bold and See also:original design, and the town hall has magnificent ceilings and wainscotting See also:round the walls of the principal halls. This brings us to the castle of See also:Heidelberg (See also:Plate VII., See also:figs. 78, 79 and 8o), which is looked upon by the Germans as the chef d'oeuvre of the Renaissance in Germany. As seen from the great court it forms an interesting study, there being the work of three periods: in the centre the picturesque See also:group of the older building (c. 1525), on the right the See also:Otto-Heinrichs-Bau (1556-1559), and on the See also:left the Friedrichs-Bau (1602–1607). Of the two the latter is the finer. The architect of the Otto-Heinrichs-Bau would seem to have been undecided whether to give greater prominence and See also:projection to his pilasters and cornices or to his windows with their dressings and pediments, so he has compromised the See also:matter by making them both about th'e same, and the effect is most monotonous. In the Friedrichs-Bau, which is a remarkable work, the pilasters are of great projection, with bold cornices and See also:simple windows well set back, while the See also:tracery of the ground-See also:floor windows is a pleasant See also:relief from the See also:constant repetition of See also:pilaster window dressings. The gables also of the Friedrichs-Bau break the See also:horizontal See also:sky-See also:line agreeably. A more See also:minute examination of the decorative details, however, betrays the See also:advent of a See also:peculiar See also:rococo style of a most debased type, which throughout the 17th century spread through Germany, and the repetition of the same details suggests that it was copied from some of the See also:pattern books which were published towards the end of the 16th century, comprising heterogeneous designs for See also:title pages, door heads, frontispieces, and even extending to new versions of the orders, which apparently appealed to the See also:German See also:mason and saved him the trouble of invention. These books, compiled by de Vries and Dietterlin, emanated from the See also:Low Countries, and their influence extended to See also:England during the Elizabethan period. At all events in Germany it would seem to have arrested the purer Italian work, which we have already noticed, and hence-forth in the gable ends one finds the most extraordinary See also:accumulation of distorted forms which, though sometimes picturesque, disfigure the German work of the 17th century. An exception might perhaps be made in favour of the Peller'sche Haus in Nurem-See also:berg (1625), one of the best houses of modest dimensions in Germany. The See also:facade in the Aegidien-Platz is a fine See also:composition; inside is a very picturesque court and See also:staircase, and the painted See also:ceiling and the wainscotting of one of the rooms in See also:woods of different See also:colours, though not very pure in style, are of excellent design and See also:execution.
Some of the most characteristic work of this type exists at Hameln, where the facades of the Rattenfangerhaus (1602), the Hochzeitshaus (1610), and many other buildings, are covered with the most extra-See also:ordinary devices, leaving scarcely a See also:foot of plain masonry as a relief. The See also:south front of the town hall of See also:Bremen (1612) is in the same style (Plate IV., fig. 70), relieved, however, by the fine large windows of the great hall and the See also:arcade in front, in which there is some picturesque detail. Later in the century the degradation increases until it reaches its See also:climax in the Zwinger See also:palace at See also:Dresden (1711), the most terrible rococo work ever conceived, if we except some of the Churrigueresque work in See also:Spain.
Among the most pleasing features in Germany are the fountains which abound in every town; of these there are See also:good examples at See also:Tubingen, See also:Prague, Hildesheim, See also:Ulm, Nuremberg, already famed for its Gothic fountains, See also:Mainz and Rothenburg. In the latter town, built on an See also:eminence, they are of great importance for the See also:supply of the town, and some of them are extremely picturesque and of good design.
Up to the See also:present we have said nothing about the ecclesiastical buildings in Germany, for the See also:reason that the period between the See also:Reformation and the conclusion of the See also:Thirty Years' See also:War was not favourable to See also: It has a wide See also:nave covered with a See also:barrel vault, and a See also:series of chapels forming semicircular recesses on each side, the walls between acting as buttresses to the great vault. The See also:transept is not deep enough to have any architectural value, but if at the east end there had been only an See also:apse it would have been a better termination than the See also:long See also:choir. The Liebfrauenkirche at Dresden (1726–1745) has a good plan, but internally is arranged like a See also:theatre with See also:pit, tiers of boxes, and a gallery, all in the worst possible See also:taste, and externally the See also:dome is far too high and destroys the See also:scale of the See also:lower See also:part of the church. An elliptical dome is never a pleasing See also:object, and in the church of St See also: Additional information and CommentsThere are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click, and select "copy." Then paste it into your website, email, or other HTML. Site content, images, and layout Copyright © 2006 - Net Industries, worldwide. |
|
[back] REMUSAT, JEAN PIERRE ABEL (1788-1832) |
[next] RENAISSANCE ARCHITECTURE IN BELGIUM AND |