Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
See also:CHRONOLOGICAL TABLE OF THE See also:ROMAN EMPERORS
B.C. A.D.
27. See also:Augustus. 244. See also: See also:Gallus. 37. See also:Gaius. 253. Aemilianus. 41. See also:Claudius. 260 See also:Valerian. 54. See also:Nero. See also:Gallienus. See also:Galba. 268. Claudius. 68, 69. -See also:Otho. Quintillus. See also:Vitellius. 27°' See also:Aurelian. 69. See also:Vespasian. 275. See also:Tacitus. 79. See also:Titus. 276. See also:Probus. 81. See also:Domitian. 282. See also:Carus. 96. See also:Nerva. 283. See also:Carinus and Numerian. 98. See also:Trajan. See also:Diocletian (Maximian 117. See also:Hadrian. 284. {Diocletian with him, 138. See also:Antoninus See also:Pius. 286). 161. See also:Marcus Aurelius. 305. See also:Constantius and See also:Galerius. 180. See also:Commodus. See also:Licinius. See also:Pertinax. 311' ( See also:Constantine I. 193. . Didius Julianus. 324. Constantine I. Septimius See also:Severus. II. 21 I. See also:Caracalla. {Constantine
337• Constantius I I.
217. Macrinus. See also:Constans.
218. Elagabalus. 350. Constantius II., See also:sole em-
222. See also: See also:Julian. The two Gordiani. 363. See also:Jovian. 238. Pupienus and Balbinus. See also:Gordian III. See also:Division of the See also:Empire. A.D. See also:West. A.D. See also:East. 364. Valentinian I. 364. See also:Valens. 375. See also:Gratian and Valentinian II. 379. See also:Theodosius I. 383. Valentinian II. 392. Theodosius I. 395. See also:Honorius. 395. See also:Arcadius. 423. Valentinian III. 408. Theodosius II. 455. See also:Maximus. 450. See also:Marcian. 455. Avitus. 457. See also:Majorian. 457. See also:Leo I. 461. Severus. 467. See also:Anthemius. 472. See also:Olybrius. 473. Glycerius. 474. See also:Julius See also:Nepos. 474. Leo II. 475. See also:Romulus Augustulus. (H. F. P.; H. S. J.)
Many See also:modern scholars have supposed that these meagre See also:official records were supplemented by-(a) popular See also:poetry, more or less legendary in content; (b) See also:family See also:chronicles, the substance of which was worked up into the funeral orations (laudations funebres) pronounced at the See also:grave of distinguished See also:Romans. The existence of the former class of documents is, however, quite unsupported by See also:evidence; as to family tradition, we cannot say more than that it has probably See also:left a See also:deposit in the accounts of republican See also:history handed down to us, and caused the exploits of the members of illustrious houses to be exaggerated in importance.
Setting aside the See also:works of See also:Greek historians who incidentally touched on Roman affairs, such as Hieronymus of Cardia, who wrote of the See also:wars of See also:Pyrrhus as a contemporary, and See also:Timaeus of
Tauromenium (c. 345-250 B.C.), who treated of the history of See also:Sicily and the West down to 272 B.C., the earliest writers on Roman history
See also:Attila and the (funs.
See also:Sack of See also:Rome by the See also:Vandals.
See also:Ricimer supreme in See also:Italy,
See also:Orestes, the See also:Pan-
See also: Postumius See also:Albinus (See also:consul, 151 B.C.). In the meantime, however, M. Porcius See also:Cato the See also:Elder (234–149 B.C.), the See also:leader of the See also:national party at Rome and a vigorous opponent of Greek See also:influence, had treated of Roman antiquities in his Origines. This See also:work was not purely annalistic, but treated of the ethnography and customs of the See also:Italian peoples, &c. Cato founded no school of antiquarian See also:research, but his use of the Latin language as the See also:medium of See also:historical See also:writing was followed by the See also:annalists of the Gracchan See also:period, L. See also:Cassius Hemina, L. See also:Calpurnius See also:Piso (consul, 133 B.C.), C. Sempronius Tuditanus (consul, 129 B.C.), Cn. See also:Gellius, Vennonius, C. Fannius (consul, 122 B.c.), and L. Caelius See also:Antipater.2 By these writers some See also:attempt was made to apply canons of See also:criticism to the traditional accounts of See also:early Roman history, but they did little more than rationalize the more obviously mythical narratives; they also followed Greek See also:literary See also:models and introduced speeches, &c., for See also:artistic effect. Where they wrote as contemporaries, however, e.g. Fannius in his See also:account of the Gracchan See also:movement, their works were of the highest value. About the beginning of this period See also:Polybius (q.v.) had published his history, which originally embraced the period of the Punic wars, and was afterwards continued to 146 B.C. His influence was not fully exerted upon Roman historians until the See also:close of the 2nd and early See also:part of the 1st See also:century B.C., when a school of writers arose who treated history with a See also:practical purpose, endeavouring to trace the motives of See also:action and to point a moral for the edification of their readers. To this school belonged Sempronius Asellio, Claudius Quadrigarius, See also:Valerius Antias and C. Licinius See also:Macer (d. 66 B.C.). Their writings were diffuse, rhetorical and inaccurate; See also:Livy complains of the See also:gross exaggerations of Valerius (whom he followed blindly in his earlier books), and Macer seems to have See also:drawn much of his material from See also:sources of very doubtful authenticity. Contemporary history was written by See also:Cornelius Sisenna (119–67 B.C.), and the work of Polybius was continued to 86 B.C. by the Stoic See also:Posidonius (c. 135–45 B.C.), a See also:man of encyclopaedic knowledge. From the Gracchan period onwards the See also:memoirs, speeches and See also:correspondence of distinguished statesmen were often published; of these no specimens are extant until we come to the Ciceronian period, when the Speeches and Letters of See also:Cicero (q.v.) and the Commentaries of Julius See also:Caesar (q.v.)—the latter continued to the close of the See also:Civil War by other hands—furnish invaluable evidence for the history of their times. We possess examples of historical See also:pamphlets with a strong party colouring in See also:Sallust's tracts on the Jugurthine War and the See also:conspiracy of See also:Catiline. During the same period Roman antiquities, See also:genealogy, See also:chronology, &c., were exhaustively treated by M. Terentius See also:Varro (116–27 B.C.) (q.v.) in his Antiquitates (in 41 books) and other works. Cicero's friend, M. See also:Pomponius See also:Atticus, also compiled a chronological table which was widely used, and Cornelius Nepos (q.v.) wrote a See also:series of historical See also:biographies which have come down to us. In the Augustan See also:age the materials accumulated by previous generations were worked up by compilers whose works are in some cases preserved. The work of Livy (q.v.) covered the history of Rome from its See also:foundation to 9 B.C. in 142 books; of these only 35 are preserved in their entirety, while the contents of the See also:rest are known in outline from an See also:epitome (periochae) and from the compendia of See also:Florus and later authors. Diodorus Siculus (q.v.) of Agyrium in Sicily followed the earlier annalists in the sections of his Universal History (down to Caesar) which dealt with Roman affairs; Dionysius of See also:Halicarnassus (q.v.), in his Roman See also:Archaeology (published in 7 B.C.), treated early Roman history in a more ambitious and rhetorical See also:style, with greater fulness than Livy, whose work he seems to have used. Universal histories were also written in the Augustan age by Nicolaus of See also:Damascus, a protege of See also:Herod the See also:Great, and See also:Trogus Pompeius, whose work is known to us from the epitome of See also:Justin (2nd century A.D.). See also:Juba, the learned king of See also:Mauretania installed by Augustus, wrote a History of Rome as well as antiquarian works. See also:Strabo (q.v.), whose See also:Geography is extant, was the author of a continuation of Polybius's history (to 27 B.C.). The learning of the See also:time was enshrined in the See also:encyclopaedia of Verrius See also:Flaccus, of which we possess part of See also:Festus's abridgment (2nd century A.D.), together with an Epitome of Festus by See also:Paulus Diaconus (temp. See also:Charlemagne). An official See also:list of the consuls and other See also:chief magistrates of the See also:republic was inscribed on the walls of the Regia (rebuilt 36 B.c.), followed somewhat later by a similar list of triumphatores; the former of these is known as the See also:Fasti Capitolini, (C.I.L.I.2, 1 sqq.), since the fragments which have been recovered are preserved in the See also:Palace of the Conservatori on the Capitol. The See also:Forum of Augustus (see ROME, See also:section Archaeology) was decorated with statues of famous Romans, on the bases of which were inscribed See also:short accounts of their exploits; some of these elogia are preserved (cf. See also:Dessau, Inscr. See also:Lat. sel. 50 sgq.). Amongst writers of the imperial period who dealt with republican For these writers see further under ANNALISTS and LivY. 2 Caelius's work dealt only with the Second Punic War. history the most important are Velleius Paterculus, whose compendium of Roman history was published in A.D. 30; See also:Plutarch (c. A.D. 45–125), in whose biographies much contemporary material was worked up; See also:Appian, who wrote under the Antonines and described the wars of the republic under See also:geographical headings (partly preserved) and the civil wars in five books, and Dio Cassius (v. infra), of whose history only that portion which deals with events from 69 B.C. onwards is extant. The date of Granius See also:Licinianus, whose fragments throw See also:light on the earlier civil wars, is not certain. The evidence of See also:inscriptions (q.v.) and coins (q.v.) begins to be of value during the 15o years of the republic. A series of See also:laws and Senatus consulta (beginning with the Senatus consultum de Bacchanalibus, 189 B.c.) throws light on constitutional questions, while the coins struck from about 150 B.C. onwards See also:bear types illustrative of the traditions preserved by the families to which the masters of the See also:mint (III viri monetales) belonged. Additional information and CommentsThere are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click, and select "copy." Then paste it into your website, email, or other HTML. Site content, images, and layout Copyright © 2006 - Net Industries, worldwide. |
|
[back] CHRONOLOGICAL TABLE |
[next] CHRONOLOGICAL TABLES OF CHRISTIAN DYNASTIES IN SPAI... |