Online Encyclopedia
Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
CONIC SECTION
Online EncyclopediaEncyclopedia Home :: COM-COR
del.icio.us it!
|
CONIC See also:SECTION , or briefly CONIC, a See also:curve in which a See also:plane intersects a See also:cone. In See also:ancient See also:geometry the name was restricted to the three particular forms now designated the See also:ellipse, See also:parabola and See also:hyperbola, and this sense is still retained in See also:general See also:works. But in See also:modern geometry, especially in the See also:analytical and projective methods, the " principle of continuity " renders advisable the inclusion of the other forms of the section of a cone, viz. the cirde, and two lines (and also two points, the reciprocal of two lines) under the general See also:title conic. The See also:definition of conics as sections of a cone was employed by the See also:Greek geometers as the fundamental principle of their researches in this subject; but the subsequent development of geometrical methods has brought to See also:light many other means for defining these curves. One definition, which is of especial value in the geometrical treatment of the conic sections (ellipse, parabola and hyperbola) in piano, is that a conic is the See also:locus of a point whose distances from a fixed point (termed the See also:focus) and a fixed See also:line (the directrix) are in See also:constant ratio. This ratio, known as the eccentricity, determines the nature of the curve; if it be greater than unity, the conic is a hyperbola; if equal to unity, a parabola; and if less than unity, an ellipse. In the See also:case of the circle, the centre is the focus, and the line at infinity the directrix; we therefore see that a circle is a conic of zero eccentricity. In projective geometry it is convenient to define a conic section as the See also:projection of a circle. The particular conic into which the circle is projected depends upon the relation of the " vanishing line " to the circle; if it intersects it in real points, then the projection is a hyperbola, if in imaginary points an ellipse, and if it touches the circle, the projection is a parabola. These results may be put in another way, viz. the line at infinity intersects the hyperbola in real points, the ellipse in imaginary points, and the parabola in coincident real points. A conic may also be regarded as the polar reciprocal of a circle for a point;if the point be without the circle the conic is an ellipse, if on the circle a parabola, and if within the circle a hyperbola. In analytical geometry the conic is represented by an algebraic See also:equation of the second degree, and the See also:species of conic is solely determined by means of certain relations between the coefficients. Confocal conics are conics having the same foci. If one of the foci be at infinity, the conics are confocal parabolas, which may also be regarded as parabolas having a See also:common focus and See also:axis. An important See also:property of confocal systems is that only two confocals can be See also:drawn through a specified point, one being an ellipse, the other a hyperbola, and they intersect orthogonally. The See also:definitions given above reflect the intimate association of these curves, but it frequently happens that a particular conic is defined by some See also:special property (as the ellipse, which is the locus of a point such that the sum of its distances from two . fixed points is constant); such definitions and other special properties are treated in the articles ELLIPSE, HYPERBOLA and PARABOLA. In this See also:article we shall consider the See also:historical development of the geometry of conics, and refer the reader to the article GEOMETRY: Analytical and Projective, for the special methods of investigation. See also:History.—The invention of the conic sections is to be assigned to the school of geometers founded by See also:Plato at See also:Athens about the 4th See also:century B.C. Under the guidance and See also:inspiration of this philosopher much See also:attention was given to the geometry of solids, and it is probable that while investigating the cone, Menaechmus, an See also:associate of Plato, See also:pupil of See also:Eudoxus, and See also:brother of Dino-stratus (the inventor of the See also:quadratrix), discovered and investigated the various curves made by truncating a cone. Menaechmus discussed three species of cones (distinguished by the magnitude of the See also:vertical See also:angle as obtuse-angled, right-angled and acute-angled), and the only section he treated was that made by a plane perpendicular to a generator of the cone; according to the species of the cone, he obtained the curves now known as the hyperbola, parabola and ellipse. That he made considerable progress in the study of these curves is evidenced by Eutocius, who flourished about the 6th century A.D., and who assigns to Menaechmus two solutions of the problem of duplicating the See also:cube b'y means of intersecting conics. On the authority of the two See also:great commentators Pappus and See also:Proclus, See also:Euclid wrote four books on conics, but the originals are now lost, and all we have is chiefly to be found in the works of See also:Apollonius of See also:Perga. See also:Archimedes contributed to the knowledge of these curves by determining the See also:area of the parabola, giving both a geometrical and a See also:mechanical See also:solution, and also by evaluating the ratio of elliptic to circular spaces. He probably wrote a See also:book on conics, but it is now lost. In his extant Conoids and Spheroids he defines a See also:conoid to be the solid formed by the revolution of the parabola and hyperbola about its axis, and a See also:spheroid to be formed similarly from the ellipse; these solids he discussed with great acumen, and effected their cubature by his famous " method of exhaustions." But the greatest Greek writer on the conic sections was Apollonius of Perga, and it is to his Conic Sections that we are indebted for a See also:review of the See also:early history of this subject. Of the eight books which made up his See also:original See also:treatise, only seven are certainly known, the first four in the original Greek, the next three are found in Arabic See also:translations, and the eighth was restored by See also:Edmund See also:Halley in 1710 from certain See also:introductory lemmas of Pappus. The first four books, of which the first three are dedicated to Eudemus, a pupil of See also:Aristotle and author of the original Eudemian See also:Summary, contain little that is original, and are principally based on the earlier works of Menaechmus, See also:Aristaeus (probably a See also:senior contemporary of Euclid, flourishing about a century later than Menaechmus), Euclid and Archimedes. The remaining books are strikingly original and are to:be regarded as embracing Apollonius's own researches. The first book, which is almost entirely concerned with the construction of the three conic sections, contains one of the most brilliant of all the discoveries of Apollonius. See also:Prior to his See also:time, a right cone of a definite vertical angle was required for the See also:generation of any particular conic; Apollonius showed that the sections could all be produced from one and the same cone, which may be either right or oblique, by simply varying the inclination of the cutting plane. The importance of this generalization cannot be overestimated; it is of more than historical See also:interest, for it remains the basis upon which certain authorities introduce the study of these curves. To comprehend more exactly the See also:discovery of Apollonius, imagine an oblique cone on a circular See also:base, of which the line joining the vertex to the centre of the base is the axis. The section made by a plane containing the axis and perpendicular to the base is a triangle contained by two generating lines of the cone and a See also:diameter of the basal circle. Apollonius considered sections of the cone made by planes at any inclination to the plane of the circular base and perpendicular to the triangle containing the axis. The points in which the cutting plane intersects the sides of the triangle are the vertices of the curve; and the line joining these points is a diameter which Apollonius named the latus transversum. He discriminated the three species of conics as follows:—At one of the two vertices erect a perpendicular (latus rectum) of a certain length (which is determined below), and join the extremity of this line to the other vertex. At any point on the latus transversum erect an See also:ordinate. Then the square of the ordinate intercepted between the diameter and the curve is equal to the rectangle contained by the portion of the diameter between the first vertex and the See also:foot of the ordinate, and the segment of the ordinate intercepted between the diameter and the line joining the extremity of the latus rectum to the second vertex. This property is true for all conics, and it served as the basis of most of the constructions and propositions given by Apollonius. The conics are distinguished by the ratio between the latus rectum (which was originally called the latus erectum, and now often referred to as the parameter) and the segment of the ordinate intercepted between the diameter and the line joining the second vertex with the extremity of the latus rectum. When the cutting plane is inclined to the base of the cone at an angle less than that made by the sides of the cone, the latus rectum is greater than the intercept on the ordinate, and we obtain the ellipse; if the plane is inclined at an equal angle as the See also:side, the latus rectum equals the intercept, and we obtain the parabola; if the inclination of the plane be greater than that of the side, we obtain the hyper-bola. In modern notation, if we denote the ordinate by y, the distance of the foot of the ordinate from the vertex (the See also:abscissa) by x, and the latus rectum by p, these relations may be expressed as y2 <px for the ellipse, y2 = px for the parabola, and y2> px for the hyperbola. Pappus in his commentary on Apollonius states that these names were given in virtue of the above relations; but according to Eutocius the curves were named the parabola, ellipse or hyperbola, according as the angle of the cone was equal to, less than, or greater than a right angle. The word parabola was used by Archimedes, who was prior to Apollonius; but this may be an See also:interpolation. We may now summarize the contents of the Conics of Apollonius. The first book deals with the generation of the three conics; the second with the asymptotes, axes and diameters; the third with various metrical relations between transversals, chords, tangents, asymptotes, &c.; the See also:fourth with the theory of the See also:pole and polar, including the See also:harmonic See also:division of a straight line, and with systems of two conics, which he shows to intersect in not more than four points; he also investigates conics having single and See also:double contact. The fifth book contains properties of normals and their envelopes, thus embracing the germs of the theory of evolutes, and also See also:maxima and minima problems, such as to draw the longest and shortest lines from a given point to a conic; the See also:sixth book is concerned with the similarity of conics; the seventh with complementary chords and conjugate diameters; the eighth book, according to the restoration of Edmund Halley, continues the subject of the preceding book. His proofs are generally See also:long and clumsy; this is accounted for in some measure by the See also:absence of symbols and technical terms. Apollonius was ignorant of the directrix of a conic, and although he incidentally discovered the focus of an ellipse and hyperbola, he does not mention the focus of a parabola. He also considered the two branches of a hyperbola, calling the second See also:branch the " opposite " hyperbola, b,nd shows the relation which existed between many metrical properties of the ellipse and hyperbola. The focus of the parabola was discovered by Pappus, who also introduced the notion of the directrix.
The Conics of Apollonius was translated into Arabic by See also:Tobit See also:ben Korra in the gth century, and this edition was followed by Halley in 1710. Although the See also:Arabs were in full See also:possession of the See also:store of knowledge of the geometry of conics which the Greeks had accumulated, they did little to increase it; the' only advance made consisted in the application of describing intersecting conics so as to solve algebraic equations. The greatpioneer in this See also: Of supreme importance is the fertile conception of the See also:planets revolving about the See also:sun in elliptic orbits. On this is based the great structure of See also:celestial See also:mechanics and the theory of universal See also:gravitation; and in the elucidation of problems more directly concerned with See also:astronomy, Kepler, See also:Sir See also:Isaac See also:Newton and others discovered many properties of the conic sections (see MECHANICS). Kepler's greatest contribution to geometry lies in his formulation of the " principle of continuity " which enabled him to show that a parabola has a " caecus (or See also:blind) focus " at infinity, and that all lines through this focus are parallel (see GEOMETRICAL CONTINUITY). This See also:assumption (which differentiates ancient from modern geometry) has been developed into one of the most potent methods of geometrical investigation (see GEOMETRY: Projective). We may also See also:notice Kepler's approximate value for the circumference of an ellipse (if the semi-axes be a and b, the approximate circumference is sr(a+b)). An important generalization of the conic sections was developed about the beginning of the 17th century by See also:Girard Desargues and Blaise See also:Pascal. Since all conics derived from a circular cone appear circular when viewed from the See also:apex, they conceived the treatment of the conic sections as projections of a circle. From this conception all the properties of conics can be deduced. Desargues has a special claim to fame on See also:account of his beautiful theorem on the involution of a quadrangle inscribed in a conic. Pascal discovered a striking property of a hexagon inscribed in a conic (the hexagrammum mysticum); from this theorem Pascal is said to have deduced over 400 corollaries, including most of the results obtained by earlier geometers. This subject is mathematically discussed in the article GEOMETRY: Projective. While Desargues and Pascal were See also:founding modern synthetic geometry, Rene Descartes was developing the algebraic See also:representation of geometric relations. The subject of analytical geometry which he virtually created enabled him to view the conic sections as algebraic equations of the second degree, the See also:form of the section depending solely on the coefficients. This method rivals in elegance all other methods; problems are investigated by purely algebraic means, and generalizations discovered which elevate the method to a position of See also:paramount importance. See also: Maclaurin's method, published in his Geometria organica (1719), is based on the proposition that the locus of the vertex of a triangle, the sides of which pass through three fixed points, and the base angles move along two fixed lines, is a conic section. Both Newton's and Maclaurin's methods have been developed by See also:Michel See also:Chasles. In modern times the study of the conic sections has proceeded along the lines which we have indicated; for further details reference should be made to the article GEOMETRY.
Geometrical constructions are treated in T. H. Eagles, Constructive Geometry of Plane Curves (1886); geometric investigations primarily based on the relation of the conic sections to a cone are given in See also:Hugo See also: See also:Drew, Geometrical Treatise on Conic Sections. Reference may also be made to C. See also: Additional information and CommentsThere are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click, and select "copy." Then paste it into your website, email, or other HTML. Site content, images, and layout Copyright © 2006 - Net Industries, worldwide. |
|
|
[back] CONIBOS, or MANOAS |
[next] CONIFEISALES |