Online Encyclopedia

Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.

LACINIUM, PROMUNTURIUM (mod. Capo del...

Online Encyclopedia
Originally appearing in Volume V16, Page 51 of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica.
Spread the word: del.icio.us del.icio.us it!

See also:

LACINIUM, PROMUNTURIUM (mod. See also:Capo delle Colonne), 7 m S.E. of See also:Crotona (mod. See also:Cotrone); the easternmost point of See also:Bruttii (mod. See also:Calabria). On the cape still stands a single See also:column of the See also:temple erected to See also:Hera Lacinia, which is said to have been fairly See also:complete in the 16th See also:century, but to have been destroyed to build the episcopal See also:palace at Cotrone. It is a Doric column with See also:capital, about 27 ft. in height. Remains of See also:marble roof-tiles have been seen on the spot (See also:Livy xlii. 3) and architectural fragments were excavated in 1886–1887 by the Archaeological See also:Institute of See also:America. The sculptures found were mostly buried again, but a few fragments, some decorative terra-cottas and a dedicatory inscription to Hera of the 6th century Inc., in private See also:possession at Cotrone, are described by F. von Duhn in Notizie degli scavi, '897, 343 seq. The date of the erection of the temple may he given as 480–440 B.C.; it is not recorded by any See also:ancient writer. See R. Koldewey and O.

Puchstein, See also:

Die griechischen Tempel in Unteritalien and Sicilien (See also:Berlin 1899, 41). LA CIOTAT, a See also:coast See also:town of See also:south-eastern See also:France in the See also:department of Bouches-du-See also:Rhone, on the See also:west See also:shore of the See also:Bay of La Ciotat, 26 m. S.E. of See also:Marseilles by See also:rail. Pop. (1906) 10,562. The See also:port is easily accessible and well sheltered. The large See also:shipbuilding yards and repairing docks of the Messageries Maritimes See also:Company give employment to between 2000 and 3000 workmen. Fishing and an active See also:coasting See also:trade are carried on; the town is frequented for See also:sea-bathing. La Ciotat was in ancient times the port of the neighbouring town of Citharista (now the See also:village of Ceyreste). LA CLOCHE, See also:JAMES DE ["See also:Prince James See also:Stuart "] (1644 ?–1669), a See also:character who was brought into the See also:history of See also:England by See also:Lord See also:Acton in '862 (See also:Home and See also:Foreign See also:Review, i. '46–174: "The See also:Secret History of See also:Charles II."). From See also:information discovered by See also:Father Boero in the archives of the See also:Jesuits in See also:Rome, Lord Acton averred that Charles II., when a lad at See also:Jersey, had a natural son, James.

The See also:

evidence follows. On the 2nd of See also:April '668, as the See also:register of the Jesuit See also:House of Novices at Rome attests, " there entered Jacobus de la Cloche:" His baggage was exiguous, his attire was clerical. He is described as " from the See also:island of Jersey, under the See also:king of England, aged See also:September 1665, and on the 7th of See also:February 1667. In both Charles acknowledges James to be his natural son, he styles him " James de la Cloche de Bourg du Jersey," and avers that to recognize him publicly " would imperil the See also:peace of the kingdoms "—why is not apparent. A third certificate of See also:birth, in Latin, undated, was from See also:Christina of See also:Sweden, who declares that James, previously a See also:Protestant, has been received into the See also:church of Rome at See also:Hamburg (where in 1667–1668 she was residing) on the 29th of See also:July 1667. The next See also:paper purports to be a See also:letter from Charles II. of See also:August 3/13 to See also:Oliva, See also:general of the Jesuits. The king writes, in See also:French, that he has See also:long wished to be secretly received into the church. He therefore desires that James, his son by a See also:young See also:lady " of the highest quality," and See also:born to him when he was about sixteen, should be ordained a See also:priest, come to England and receive him. Charles alludes to previous attempts of his own to be secretly admitted (1662). James must be sent secretly to See also:London at once, and Oliva must say nothing to Christina of Sweden (then meditating a See also:journey to Rome), and must never write to Charles except when James carries the letter. Charles next writes on August 29/September 9. He is most anxious that Christina should not meet James; if she knows Charles's See also:design of changing his creed she will not keep it secret, and Charles will infallibly lose his See also:life.

With this letter there is another, written when the first had been sealed. Charles insists that James must not be accompanied, as novices were, when travelling, by a Jesuit socius or See also:

guardian. Charles's wife and See also:mother have just heard that this is the See also:rule, but the rule must be broken. James, who is to travel as " See also:Henri de See also:Rohan," must not come by way of France. Oliva will See also:supply him with funds. On the back of this letter Oliva has written the draft of his brief reply to Charles (from See also:Leghorn, See also:October 14, 1668). He merely says that the See also:bearer, a French See also:gentleman (James spoke only French), will inform the king that his orders have been executed. Besides these two letters is one from Charles to James, of date August 4/14. It is addressed to " Le Prince Stuart," though none of Charles's bastards was allowed to See also:bear the Stuart name. James is told that he may See also:desert the clerical profession if he pleases. In that See also:case " you may claim higher titles from us than the See also:duke of See also:Monmouth." (There was no higher See also:title See also:save prince of See also:Wales!) If Charles and his See also:brother, the duke of See also:York, die childless, " the kingdoms belong to you, and See also:parliament cannot legally oppose you, unless as, at See also:present, they can only elect Protestant See also:kings." This letter ought to have opened the eyes of Lord Acton and other historians who accept the myth of James de la Cloche. Charles knew that the See also:crown of England was not elective, that there was no Exclusion See also:Act, and that there were legal heirs if he and his brother died without issue.

The last letter of Charles is dated See also:

November 18/28, and purports to have been brought from England to Oliva by James de la Cloche on his return to Rome. It reveals the fact that Oliva, despite Charles's orders, did send James by way of France, with a socius or guardian whom he was to pick up in France on his return to England. Charles says that James is to communicate certain matters to Oliva, and come back at once. Oliva is to give James all the See also:money he needs, and Charles will later make an ample donation to the Jesuits. He acknowledges a See also:debt to Oliva of goo, to be paid in six months. The reader will remark that the king has never paid a See also:penny to James or to Oliva, and that Oliva has never communicated directly with Charles. The truth is that all of Charles's letters are forgeries. This is certain because in all he writes frequently as if his mother, Henrietta Maria, were in London, and constantly in company with him. Now she had See also:left England for France in 1665, and to England she never returned. As the letters—including that to " Prince Stuart "—are all forged, it is clear that de la Cloche was an impostor. His aim had been to get money from Oliva, and to pretend to travel to England, meaning to enjoy himself. He did not quite succeed, for Oliva sent a socius with him into France.

His precautions to avoid a See also:

meeting with Christina of Sweden were necessary. She knew no more of him than did Charles, and would have exposed him. 51 The name of James de la Cloche appears no more in documents. He reached Rome in See also:December 1668, and in See also:January a See also:person calling himself " Prince James Stuart " appears in See also:Naples, accompanied by a socius styling himself a French See also:knight of See also:Malta. Both are on their way to England, but Prince James falls See also:ill and stays in Naples, while his See also:companion departs. The knight of Malta may be a Jesuit. In Naples, Prince James marries a girl of no position, and is arrested on suspicion of being a coiner. To his confessors (he had two in See also:succession) he says that he is a son of Charles II. Our See also:sources are the despatches of See also:Kent, the See also:English See also:agent at Naples, and the Lettere, vol. iii., of Vincenzo Armanni (1674), who had his information from one of the confessors of. the " Prince." The See also:viceroy of Naples communicated with Charles II., who disowned the impostor; Prince James, however, was released, and died at Naples in August 1669, leaving a See also:wild will, in which he claims for his son, still unborn, the " apanage " of Monmouth or Wales, " which it is usual to bestow on natural sons of the king." The son lived till about 1750, a penniless pretender, and writer of begging letters. It is needless to pursue Lord Acton's conjectures about later mysterious appearances of James de la Cloche at the See also:court of Charles, or to discuss the See also:legend that his mother was a lady of Jersey—or a See also:sister of Charles! The Jersey myths may be found in The See also:Man of the See also:Mask (1908), by See also:Monsignor See also:Barnes, who argued that James was the man in the See also:iron mask (see IRON MASK). Later Monsignor Barnes, who had observed that the letter of Charles to Prince James Stuart is a See also:forgery, noticed the impossibility that Charles, in 1668, should constantly write of his mother as See also:resident in London, which she left for ever in 1665.

Who de la Cloche really was it is impossible to discover, but he was a bold and successful swindler, who took in, not only the general of the Jesuits, but Lord Acton and a See also:

generation of guileless historians. (A. L.) LA CONDAMINE, CHARLES See also:MARIE DE (17o1–1774), French geographer and mathematician, was born at See also:Paris on the 28th of January 170-1. He was trained for the military profession, but turned his See also:attention to See also:science and See also:geographical exploration. After taking See also:part in a scientific expedition in the See also:Levant (1731), he became a member with See also:Louis See also:Godin and See also:Pierre See also:Bouguer of the expedition sent to See also:Peru in 1735 to determine the length of a degree of the See also:meridian in the neighbourhood of the See also:equator. His associations with his principals were unhappy; the expedition was beset by many difficulties, and finally La Condamine separated from the See also:rest and made his way from See also:Quito down the See also:Amazon, ultimately reaching See also:Cayenne. His was the first scientific exploration of the Amazon. He returned to Paris in 1744 and published the results of his measurements and travels with a See also:map of the Amazon in Mem. de l'academie See also:des sciences, 1745 (English See also:translation 1745-1747). On a visit to Rome La Condamine made careful measurements of the ancient buildings with a view to a precise determination of the length of the See also:Roman See also:foot. The See also:journal of his voyage to South America was published in Paris in 1751. He also wrote in favour of inoculation, and on various other subjects, mainly connected with his See also:work in South America. He died at Paris on the 4th of February 1774.

End of Article: LACINIUM, PROMUNTURIUM (mod. Capo delle Colonne), 7

Additional information and Comments

There are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click, and select "copy." Then paste it into your website, email, or other HTML.
Site content, images, and layout Copyright © 2006 - Net Industries, worldwide.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.

Links to articles and home page are always encouraged.

[back]
LACHMANN, KARL KONRAD FRIEDRICH WILHELM (1793-1851)...
[next]
LACONIA