Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
See also:UTILITARIANISM (See also:Lat. utilis, useful) , the See also:form of ethical See also:doctrine which teaches that conduct is morally See also:good according as it promotes the greatest happiness of the greatest number of See also:people. The See also:term " utilitarian " was put into currency by J. S. See also: Their See also:interest was to show that the See also:gospel See also:precept of universal benevolence, which owes nothing to civil enactment, was both agreeable to nature and conducive to happiness. Cumberland, therefore, See also:lays it down that " The greatest possible benevolence of every rational See also:agent towards all the See also:rest constitutes the happiest state of each and all. Accordingly See also:common good will be the supreme See also:law "; and this supreme and all-inclusive law is essentially a law of nature. This important principle was See also:developed by Cumberland with much originality and vigour. But his handling of it is clumsy and confused; and he does not make it sufficiently clear why the law of nature should be obeyed. He does, however, See also:lay much stress upon the naturally social character of See also:man; and this points forward to that treatment of morality as a See also:function of the social organism which characterizes See also:modern ethical theory. The further development of theological utilitarianism was conditioned by opposition to the Moral Sense doctrine of See also:Shaftesbury and See also:Hutcheson. Both these writers, more particularly the latter, had postulated in controverting Hobbes the existence of a moral sense to explain the fact that we approve benevolent actions, done either by ourselves or by others, which bring no See also:advantage to ourselves. There was a See also:general feeling that the See also:advocates of the moral sense claimed too much for human nature and that they assumed a degree of unselfishness and a natural inclination towards virtue which by no means corresponded with the hard facts. The See also:fire of human See also:enthusiasm burnt See also:low in the 18th See also:century, and theologians shared the general conviction that self-interest was the ruling principle of men's conduct. Moral sense seemed to them a subjective affair, dangerous to the interests of See also:religion. For, if the ultimate ground of See also:obligation lay in a refined sensitiveness to See also:differences between right and wrong, what should be said to a man who might affirm that, just as he had no See also:ear for See also:music, he was insensitive to ethical differences commonly recognized? Moreover, if See also:mere sense were sufficient to See also:direct our conduct, what need had we for religion? Such considerations prevailed where we might least expect to find them, in the mind of the idealist See also:Berkeley. And it was another See also:clergy-man, See also: Hume, taking for granted that benevolence is the supreme virtue, points out that the essence of benevolence is to increase the happiness of others. Thus he establishes the principle of utility. " See also:Personal merit," he says, " consists entirely in the usefulness or agreeableness of qualities to the See also:person himself possessed of them, or to others, who have any intercourse with him." This is See also:plain enough; what re-mains doubtful is the See also:reason why we approve of these qualities in another man which are useful or agreeable to others. Hume raises the question explicitly, but answers that here is an ultimate principle beyond which we cannot See also:hope to penetrate. For this reason Hume is sometimes classed as a moral-sense philosopher rather than as a utilitarian. From his point of view, however, the distinction was not important. His purpose was to defend what may be called a humanist position in moral philosophy; that is, to show that morality was not an affair of mysterious innate principles, or abstract relations, or super-natural sanctions, but depended on the See also:familiar conditions of personal and social welfare. The rise of political utilitarianism illustrates most strikingly the way in which the value and dignity of philosophical principles depends on the purpose to which they are applied. Abstractly considered, Bentham's See also:interpretation of human nature was not more exalted than Paley's. Like Paley, he regards men as moved entirely by See also:pleasure and See also:pain, and omits from the See also:list of pleasures most of those which to well natured men make See also:life really See also:worth living: and he treats all pleasures as homogeneous in character so that they can be measured into equal and equally desirable lots. But his purpose was the exalted one of effecting reforms in the laws and constitution of his See also:country. He took up the greatest happiness principle not as an attractive philosopheme, but as a criterion to distinguish good laws from See also:bad. See also:Sir John See also:Bowring tells us that when Bentham was casting about for such a criterion " he met with Hume's Essays and found in them what he sought. This was the principle of utility, or, as he subsequently expressed it with more precision, the doctrine that the only test of goodness of moral precepts or legislative enactments is their tendency to promote the greatest possible happiness of the greatest possible number." These opinions are developed in his Principles of Morals and Legislation ,(pub. in 1789) and in the Deontology (published posthumously in 1834). Philosophically Bentham makes but little advance upon the theological utilitarians. His table of springs of actions shows the same mean-spirited omissions that we notice in his predecessors; he See also:measures the quantity of pleasures by the coarsest and most See also:mechanical tests; and he sets up general pleasure as the criterion of moral goodness. It makes no considerable difference that he looked for the moral See also:sanction not to God but to the state: men, in his See also:scheme, are to be induced to obey the rules of the common good by legally ordained penalties and rewards. He never faced the question how a man is to be induced to See also:act morally in cases where these governmental sanctions could be evaded or did not exist in the particular state in which a man chanced to find himself. These principles of Bentham were the See also:inspiration of that most important school of practical See also:English thinkers, the Philosophic Radicals of the See also:early 1gth century; these were the principles on which they
relied in those attacks upon legal and political abuses. From Bentham the. leadership in utilitarianism passed to See also: To say that pleasure is the moral end is a merely formal statement: it makes all the difference what experiences you regard as pleasant and which pleasures you regard as the most important. Mill belonged to a See also:generation in which the most remarkable feature was the growth of sympathy. He puts far greater stress than his predecessors upon the sympathetic pleasures, and thus quite avoids that See also:appearance of mean prudential selfishness that is such a depressing feature in Paley and Bentham. Moreover, it is in sympathy that he finds the obligation and sanction of morality. " Morality," he says, " consists in conscientious shrinking from the violation of moral rules; and the basis of this conscientious sentiment is the social feelings of mankind; the See also:desire to be in unity with our See also:fellow-creatures, which is already a powerful principle in human nature, and happily one of those which tend to become stronger from the influences of advancing See also:civilization." Such passages in Mill have their full significance only when we take them in connexion with that rising See also:tide of humanitarian sentiment which made itself See also:felt in all the literature and in all the practical activity of his See also:time. The other notable feature of John Mill's doctrine is his distinction of value between pleasures: some pleasures, those of the mind, are higher and more valuable than others, those of the See also:body. It is commonly said that in making this distinction Mill has practically given up utilitarianism, because he has applied to pleasure (alleged to be the supreme criterion) a further criterion which is not pleasure. But the validity of this See also:criticism may fairly be questioned. Pleasure is nothing See also:objective and objectively measurable: it is simply feeling pleased. The merest pleasure-See also:lover may consistently say that he prefers a single See also:glass of good See also:champagne to several bottles of cooking-See also:sherry; the slight but delicate experience of the single glass of good See also:wine may fairly be regarded as preferable to the more massive but coarser experience of the large quantity of bad wine. So also Mill is justified in preferring a See also:scene of See also:Shakespeare or an See also:hour's conversation with a friend to a great See also:mass of See also:lower pleasure. The last writer who, though not a political utilitarian, may be regarded as belonging to the school of Mill is See also: His theory is a sort of reconciliation of utilitarianism with intuitionism, a position which he reached by studying Mill in See also:combination with Kant and See also: " Thus the imperious word ought seems merely to imply the consciousness of a persistent See also:instinct, either innate or partly acquired, serving as a See also:guide, though liable to be disobeyed."
The most famous of the systematic exponents of evolutional utilitarianism is, of course, See also:Herbert See also:Spencer, in whose Data of Ethics (1879) the facts of morality are viewed in relation with his vast conception of the See also:total See also:process of See also:cosmic See also:evolution. He shows how morality can be viewed physically, as evolving from an indefinite incoherent homogeneity to a definite, coherent heterogeneity; biologically, as evolving from a less to a more See also:complete performance of vital functions, so that the perfectly moral man is one whose life is physiologically perfect and there-fore perfectly pleasant; psychologically, as evolving from a state in which sensations are more potent than ideas (so that the future is sacrificed to the See also:present) to a state in which ideas are more potent than sensations (so that a greater but distant pleasure is preferred to a less but present pleasure); sociologic-ally, as evolving from approval of war and warlike sentiments to approval of the sentiments appropriate to See also:international See also:peace and to an See also:industrial organization of society. The sentiment of obligation Spencer regards as essentially transitory; when a man reaches a See also:condition of perfect See also:adjustment, he will always do what is right without any sense of being obliged to it. The best feature of the Data of Ethics is its See also:anti-ascetic vindication of pleasure as man's natural guide to what is physiologically healthy and morally good. For the rest, Spencer's doctrine is valuable more as stimulating to thought by its originality and width of view than as offering direct solutions of ethical problems. Following up the same line of thought, See also:Leslie See also:Stephen with less brilliance but more See also:attention to scientific method has worked out in his Science of Ethics (1882) the conception of morality as a function of the social organism: while See also:Professor S. See also: See also:Hobhouse's Morals in Evolution and Professor Westermarck's Origin and Development of the Moral Ideas (both published in 1906) See also:deal with the See also:matter from the side of See also:anthropology. See E. Albee's History of English Utilitarianism (1902), a complete and painstaking survey. Leslie Stephen's English Utilitarians (pub. in 1900) deals elaborately with Bentham and the See also:Mills, but more as social and political reformers than as theoretic moralists. See also ETHICS. (H. Additional information and CommentsThere are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click, and select "copy." Then paste it into your website, email, or other HTML. Site content, images, and layout Copyright © 2006 - Net Industries, worldwide. |
|
[back] UTICA |
[next] UTMAN KHEL |