Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
See also:NAVIGATION See also:LAWS . The laws grouped under this See also:title are a See also:branch rather of municipal See also:law than of the See also:general maritime law. They are based upon the right of a See also:state to regulate the navigation of its own See also:waters and to protect its own See also:commerce. One of the most curious See also:early books on the subject is See also:Captain G. St Lo, See also:England's Safetie or a Bridle to the See also:French See also: After 1854 the only See also:relics of such restrictions were found in the provisions of the Customs Consolidation Act 1853, § 324, by which, in See also:order to secure See also:reciprocity, prohibitions or restrictions may by order in See also:council be imposed upon the ships of any See also:country in which British ships are liable to similar prohibitions or restrictions. Subject to these exceptions, a See also:foreign ship is in the same position as a British ship with regard to British trade. This right of foreign ships is expressly recognized by the Customs Law Consolidation Act 1876; by § 141 of that act foreign ships engaged in the coasting trade are not to be subject to higher rates than British ships. Any advantages which a British ship has, e.g. the right of claiming See also:protection for her See also:flag, the non-See also:attachment to her of a maritime See also:lien for necessaries supplied in a British See also:port, are not directly connected with the policy under which the Navigation Acts have become obsolete. These advantages are not secured to a British ship until she is registered. See also:United States law agrees with British in this respect. " The United States have imitated the policy of England and other commercial nations in conferring See also:peculiar privileges upon See also:American-built ships and owned by our own citizens. . . . The object of the Registry Acts is to encourage our own trade, navigation and See also:shipbuilding by granting peculiar or exclusive privileges of trade to the flag of the United States, and by prohibiting the communication of those immunities to the See also:shipping and mariners of other countries " (See also:Kent, See also:Comm. iii. 139). It may be noticed that an See also:alien is generally incapable of becoming the owner of a ship. This incapacity was specially preserved in the See also:case of British ships by the See also:Naturalization Act 1870, § 14. The second class of navigation laws includes those which See also:deal with the navigation of any waters over which a state has any See also:control, and embraces all that is necessary for the due use of such waters, as rules of the road, management of harbours and See also:light-houses, and licensing and control of pilots. Such laws may deal with (I) the high seas, (2) tidal waters other than the high seas, (3) non-tidal waters.
1. The claims of various natioffs to dominion over parts of the high seas have now become matters of merely See also:historical See also:interest. Such claims have been at different times advanced by Great Britain, See also: 572, to the ships of most foreign countries, with a See also:special See also:provision as to See also:China. In the case of a state which has not assented to them, the only rules enforceable are the general rules of the sea, gradually ascertained by individual cases before courts of See also:admiralty. 2. For the navigation of its tidal waters—as far as they are territorial—a state may legislate without the assent of other states. An example of such legislation is afforded by the Territorial Waters Jurisdiction Act 1878, a measure passed in consequence of the celebrated case of R. v. Keyn, L.R. 2 Ex. D., 126 (the " See also:Franconia " case), in 1876. Under the See also:head of territorial waters would fall the " narrow seas " (as the See also:Bristol Channel, Great See also:Belt or Straits of See also:Messina), bays and harbours, estuaries and arms of the sea, navigable tidal See also:rivers, and the sea for the distance of a marine See also:league from the See also:shore. Such waters being res publicae though not res communes, as are the high seas, are prima facie subject to the jurisdiction of the state. In England the See also:soil under such waters, or at least under all but the last See also:kind, is prima facie vested in the See also:crown, subject to the public rights of See also:fishery and anchorage. For the distance of a marine league from See also:low-See also:water See also:mark the crown has certainly jurisdiction for See also:police and See also:revenue purposes. This is a See also:rule of general See also:international law. It may be noted that the Institut de See also:Droit International proposed to See also:double this limit. See See also: Examples of such rules are the orders in council regulating the Mersey and Irwell navigation and the See also:Bridgewater navigation, 18th May 187o. Such waters being private See also:property, the application for the rules by the proprietors is recited in the order in council. The distinction See also:drawn in the United States between navigable and boatable rivers seems to be peculiar to that country, unless indeed it is analogous to the " fleuves et rivieres navigables ou flottables " of the Code Napoleon, § 538. It is at least unknown in Great Britain. Remedies for Obstruction and Pollution.—These may be either criminal or See also:civil—the criminal by See also:indictment or See also:information, the civil by See also:action for See also:damages or for an See also:injunction, in addition to the criminal remedy, where special damage has been sustained. Pollution is expressly provided for by the Rivers Pollution Prevention Act 1876, which gives jurisdiction to See also:county courts in cases within the act. International Law.—The international law as to the navigation of the high seas has been sketched above. Reference should also be made to what is known as the " Rule of the See also:War of 1756 " to the effect that where a colonial or coasting trade is prohibited to other nations in time of See also:peace, a neutral by engaging in this trade by permission of a belligerent in time of war is liable to the other belligerent. The leading case is The Immanuel (1799), 2 C. See also:Robinson's See also:Rep. 186. Regulations for the coasting trade may be made by the government of See also:India under the powers of the Customs Consolidation Act 1853, § 329, and by the legislature of a British See also:possession under the Merchant Shipping Act 1894, § 736. As to territorial waters, it is the general though not the universal See also:opinion of jurists that the state to which the territorial waters belong has a right to forbid their navigation by foreigners. The See also:free navigation of rivers has often been the subject of See also:treaties, almost necessarily so where a See also:river is the boundary between two states. In such a case, if a state were to maintain the strict See also:letter of its rights, navigation would be almost impossible, as each state is proprietor down to the See also:middle See also:line of the See also:bed of the river, the See also:medium filum See also:aquae or See also:thalweg. By the treaty of See also:Vienna in 1815 it was provided that the navigation of all rivers separating or traversing the states that were parties thereto should be open for commercial purposes to the vessels of all nations, subject to a See also:uniform See also:system of police and tolls. The treaty of See also:Paris, 1856, extended this principle to the See also:Danube. In See also:America the cases of the See also:Mississippi and the St See also:Lawrence are important. By the treaty of See also:Versailles, 1783, it was provided that " the navigation of the Mississippi shall for ever remain free and open to the subjects of Great Britain and the citizens of the United States." But the United States afterwards acquired See also:Louisiana and See also:Florida; and, the stipulation as to British subjects not being renewed in the treaty of See also:Ghent, 1814, the United States maintains that the right of navigating the Mississippi is vested exclusively in its citizens. As to the St Lawrence, after disputes for a See also:long See also:period between Great Britain and the United States, the right of free navigation for purposes of commerce was secured to the United States by the treaty of Washing-ton, 1871. There are some waters, such as the See also:Suez Canal and the See also:Panama Canal, which are subject to peculiar engagements by treaty or See also:convention. The former depends on the Convention of See also:Constantinople, 29th of See also:October 1888, the latter—as far as regards the United Kingdom and the United States—on the See also:Hay-See also:Pauncefote Treaty, 18th of November 1901. But as a rule it may be said that in time of peace the territorial waters of a state are open to foreigners for commercial purposes, subject to observance of any rules as to police, pilotage, &c., imposed by the state. Tolls may be imposed by the state upon foreigners. This right is expressly recognized in most commercial treaties. A notable instance was the claim of See also:Denmark to See also:charge what were called the " See also:Sound dues " from all vessels passing See also:Elsinore, though the Sound was not strictly her territorial water. The right was not universally recognized, though it had prescription in its favour and was invariably paid. In 1857 the dues were abolished, and See also:compensation paid to Denmark for the loss of her alleged right. (J. Additional information and CommentsThere are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click, and select "copy." Then paste it into your website, email, or other HTML. Site content, images, and layout Copyright © 2006 - Net Industries, worldwide. |
|
[back] NAVIGATION (from Lat. navis, ship, and agere, to mo... |
[next] NAVIUS, ATTUS |