Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
See also:HERBERT OF CHERBURY, See also:EDWARD HERBERT, See also:BARON (1583-1648) , See also:English soldier, diplomatist, historian and religious philosopher, eldest son of See also:Richard Herbert of See also:Montgomery See also:Castle (a member of a See also:collateral See also:branch of the See also:family of the earls of See also:Pembroke) and of Magdalen, daughter of See also:Sir Richard See also:Newport, was See also:born at Eyton-on-See also:Severn near Wroxeter on the 3rd of See also: After the See also:death of de Luynes Herbert resumed his See also:post in February 1622. He was very popular at the See also:French court and showed considerable See also:diplomatic ability, his See also:chief See also:objects being to accomplish the See also:union between See also: Sir Henry was See also:master of the See also:revels to Charles I. and Charles II., being busily employed in See also:reading and licensing plays and in supervising all kinds of public entertainments. He died in April 1673; his son Henry died in See also:January 1709, when the latter's son Henry became 2nd Lord Herbert of Cherbury of the second creation. He died without issue in April 1738, and again the barony became extinct. In 1743 it was revived for Henry See also:Arthur Herbert (c. 1703-1772), who five years later was created See also:earl of See also:Powis. This nobleman was a great-grandson of the 2nd Lord Herbert of Cherbury of the first creation, and since his See also:time the barony has been held by the earls of Powis.
Lord Herbert's cousin, Sir Edward Herbert (c. 1591-1657), was a member of parliament under James I. and Charles I. Having become See also:attorney-See also:general he was instructed by Charles to take proceedings against some members of parliament who had been concerned in the passing of the See also:Grand Remonstrance; the only result, however, was Herbert's own See also:impeachment by the See also:House of See also:Commons and his imprisonment. Later in life he was with the exiled royal family in See also: (c. 1648-1698), titular earl of See also:Portland, who was made chief See also:justice of the king's See also:bench in 1685 in See also:succession to Lord See also:Jeffreys. . It was Sir Edward who declared for the royal See also:prerogative in the See also:case of Godden v. See also:Hales, asserting that the See also:kings of England, being See also:sovereign princes, could dispense with particular See also:laws in particular cases. After the See also:escape of James II. to France this king made Herbert his lord See also:chancellor and created him earl of Portland, although he was a See also:Protestant and had exhibited a certain amount of See also:independence during 1687. The first Lord Herbert's real claim to fame and remembrance is derived from his writings. Herbert's first and most important See also:work is the De veritate grout distinguitur a revelatione, a verisimili, a rossibili, et a falso (Paris, 1624; London, 1633; translated into French 1639, but never into English; a MS. in add. See also:MSS. 7081. Another, See also:Sloane HISS. 3957, has the author's See also:dedication to his brother See also:George in his own See also:hand, dated 1622). It combines a theory of knowledge with a partial See also:psychology, a methodology for the investigation of truth, and a See also:scheme of natural See also:religion. The author's method is prolix and often far from clear; the See also:book is no compact See also:system, but it contains the See also:skeleton and much of the soul of a See also:complete See also:philosophy. Giving up all past theories as useless, Herbert professedly endeavours to constitute a new and true system. Truth, which he defines as a just conformation of the faculties with one another and with their objects, he distributed into four classes or stages: (I) truth in the thing or the truth of the See also:object; (2) truth of the See also:appearance; (3) truth of the See also:apprehension (conceptus); (4) truth of the See also:intellect. The faculties of the mind are as numerous as the See also:differences of their objects, and are accordingly innumerable; but they may be arranged in four See also:groups. The first and fundamental and most certain See also:group is the Natural See also:Instinct, to which belong the ,cocvai gvvoLae, the notitiae communes, which are innate, of divine origin and indisputable. The second group, the next in certainty, is the sensus internus (under which See also:head Herbert discusses amongst others love, hate, fear, See also:conscience with its communis notitia, and See also:free will); the third is the sensus externus; and the See also:fourth is discursus, reasoning, to which, as being the least certain, we have recourse when the other faculties fail. The ratiocinative faculties proceed by See also:division and See also:analysis, by questioning, and are slow and See also:gradual in their See also:movement; they take aid from the other faculties, those of the instinctus naturalis being always the final test. Herbert's categories or questions to be used in investigation are ten in number whether (a thing is), what, of what sort, how much, in what relation, how, when, where, whence, wherefore. No See also:faculty, rightly used, can err " even in dreams "; badly exercised, reasoning becomes the source of almost all our errors. The discussion of the notitiae communes is the most characteristic part of the book. The exposition of them, though highly dogmatic, is at times strikingly Kantian in substance. " So far are these elements or sacred principles from being derived from experience or observation that without some of them, or at least some one of them, we can neither experiencenor even observe." Unless ,we See also:felt driven by them to explore the nature of things, " it would never occur to us to distinguish one thing from another." It cannot be said that Herbert proves the existence of the See also:common notions; he does not deduce them or even give any See also:list of them. But each faculty has its common notion; and they may be distinguished by six marks, their priority, independence, universality, certainty, See also:necessity (for the well-being of See also:man), and immediacy. See also:Law is based on certain common notions; so is religion. Though Herbert expressly defines the See also:scope of his book as dealing with the intellect, not faith, it is the common notions of religion he has illustrated most fully; and it is See also:plain that it is in this part of his system that he is chiefly interested.. The common notions of religion are the famous five articles, which became the See also:charter of the English deists (see DE1SM). There is little polemic against the received See also:form of Christiapity, but Herbert's attitude towards the Church's See also:doctrine is distinctly negative, and he denies See also:revelation except to the individual soul. In the De religione gentilium (completed 1645, published See also:Amsterdam, 1663, translated into English by W. See also:Lewis, London, 1705) he gives what may be called, in See also:Hume's words, "a natural See also:history of religion." By examining the See also:heathen religions Herbert finds, to his great delight, the universality of his five great articles, and that these are clearly recognizable under their absurdities as they are under the See also:rites, ceremonies and polytheism invented by sacerdotal superstition. The same vein is maintained in the tracts De cansis errorum, an unfinished work on logical fallacies, Religio laici, and Ad sacerdotes de religione laici (1645). In the De veritate Herbert produced the first purely metaphysical See also:treatise. written by an Englishman, and in the De religione gentilium one of the earliest studies extant in See also:comparative See also:theology; while both his metaphysical speculations and his religious views are throughout distinguished by the highest originality and provoked considerable controversy. His achievements in See also:historical See also:writing are vastly inferior, and vitiated by See also:personal aims and his preoccupation to gain the royal favour. Herbert's first historical work is the Expeditio Buckinghami duds (published in a Latin See also:translation in 1656 and in the See also:original English by the earl of Powis for the Philobiblon Society in 186o), a See also:defence of Buckingham's conduct of the See also:ill-fated expedition of 1627. Phe Life and Raigne of King Henry VIII. (1649) derives its chief value from its See also:composition from original documents, but is ill-proportioned, and the author See also:judges the See also:character and statesmanship of Henry with too obvious a partiality. His poems, published in 1665 (reprinted and edited by J. Churton See also:Collins in 1881), show him in general a faithful See also:disciple of See also:Donne, obscure and uncouth. His satires are miserable compositions, but a few of his lyrical verses show See also:power of reflection and true See also:inspiration, while his use of the See also:metre afterwards employed by See also:Tennyson in his " In Memoriam " is particularly happy and effective. His Latin poems are See also:evidence of his scholarship. Three of these had appeared together with the De causis errorum in 1645. To these See also:works must be added A See also:Dialogue between a See also:Tutor and a See also:Pupil (1768; a treatise on See also:education, MS. in the Bodleian Library); a treatise on the king's supremacy in the Church (MS. in the See also:Record Office and at See also:Queen's College, Oxford), and his well-known auto-See also:biography, first published by See also:Horace See also:Walpole in 1764, a naive and amusing narrative, too much occupied, however, with his duels and amorous adventures, to the exclusion of more creditable incidents in his career, such as his contributions to philosophy and history, his intimacy with Donne, See also:Ben See also:Jonson, See also:Selden and See also:Carew, See also:Casaubon, Gassendi and See also:Grotius, or his See also:embassy in France, in relation to which he only described the splendour of his See also:retinue and his social triumphs. Additional information and CommentsThere are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click, and select "copy." Then paste it into your website, email, or other HTML. Site content, images, and layout Copyright © 2006 - Net Industries, worldwide. |
|
[back] HERBERT (FAMILY) |
[next] HERBERT OF LEA, SIDNEY HERBERT, 1ST BARON (181b-186... |