Online Encyclopedia

Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.

HERBERT OF CHERBURY, EDWARD HERBERT, ...

Online Encyclopedia
Originally appearing in Volume V13, Page 341 of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica.
Spread the word: del.icio.us del.icio.us it!

See also:

HERBERT OF CHERBURY, See also:EDWARD HERBERT, See also:BARON (1583-1648) , See also:English soldier, diplomatist, historian and religious philosopher, eldest son of See also:Richard Herbert of See also:Montgomery See also:Castle (a member of a See also:collateral See also:branch of the See also:family of the earls of See also:Pembroke) and of Magdalen, daughter of See also:Sir Richard See also:Newport, was See also:born at Eyton-on-See also:Severn near Wroxeter on the 3rd of See also:March 1583. After careful private tuition he matriculated at University See also:College, See also:Oxford, as a See also:gentleman commoner, in May 1596. On the 28th of See also:February 1599 he married his See also:cousin See also:Mary, daughter and heiress of Sir See also:William Herbert (d. 1593), He returned to Oxford with his wife and See also:mother, continued his studies, and obtained proficiency in See also:modern See also:languages as well as in See also:music, See also:riding and See also:fencing. On the See also:accession of See also:James I. he presented himself at See also:court and was created a See also:knight of the See also:Bath on the 24th of See also:July 5603. In 1608 he went to See also:Paris, enjoying the friendship and hospitality of the old See also:constable de See also:Montmorency, and being entertained by See also:Henry IV. On his return, as he says himself with naive vanity, he was " in See also:great esteem both in court and See also:city, many of the greatest desiring my See also:company." In 16ro he served as a volunteer in the See also:Low Countries under the See also:prince of See also:Orange, whose intimate friend he became, and distinguished himself at the See also:capture of Juliers from the See also:emperor. He offered to decide the See also:war by engaging in, single combat with a See also:champion chosen from among the enemy, but his See also:challenge was declined. During an See also:interval in the fighting he paid a visit to See also:Spinola, in the See also:Spanish See also:camp near Wezel, and afterwards to the elector See also:palatine at See also:Heidelberg, subsequently travelling in See also:Italy. At the instance of the See also:duke of See also:Savoy he led an expedition of 4000 See also:Huguenots from See also:Languedoc into See also:Piedmont to help the Savoyards against See also:Spain, but after nearly losing his See also:life in the See also:journey to See also:Lyons he was imprisoned on his arrival there, and the enterprise came to nothing. Thence he returned to the See also:Netherlands and the prince of Orange, arriving in See also:England in 1617. In 1619 he was made by See also:Buckingham See also:ambassador at Paris, but a See also:quarrel with de See also:Luynes and a challenge sent by him to the latter occasioned his recall in 1621.

After the See also:

death of de Luynes Herbert resumed his See also:post in February 1622. He was very popular at the See also:French court and showed considerable See also:diplomatic ability, his See also:chief See also:objects being to accomplish the See also:union between See also:Charles and Henrietta Maria and secure the assistance of See also:Louis XIII. for the unfortunate elector palatine. This latter See also:advantage he could not obtain, and he was dismissed in See also:April 1624. He returned See also:home greatly . in See also:debt and received little See also:reward for his services beyond the Irish See also:peerage of Castle See also:island in 1624 and the English See also:barony of Cherbury, or Chirbury, on the 7th of May 1629. In 1632 he was appointed a member of the See also:council of war. He attended the See also:king at See also:York in 1639, and in May 1642 was imprisoned bx the See also:parliament for urging the addition of the words " without cause " to the See also:resolution that the king violated his See also:oath by making war on parliament. He determined after this to take no further See also:part in the struggle, retired to Montgomery Castle, and declined the king's See also:summons. On the 5th of See also:September 1644 he surrendered the castle to the See also:parliamentary forces, returned to See also:London, submitted, and was granted a See also:pension of £20 a See also:week. In 1647. he paid a visit to Gassendi at Paris, and died in London on the loth of See also:August 1648, being buried in the See also:church of St See also:Giles's in the See also:Fields. See also:Lord Herbert See also:left two sons, Richard (c. 1600-1655), who succeeded him as 2nd Lord Herbert of Cherbury, and Edward, the See also:title becoming See also:extinct in the See also:person of Henry Herbert, the 4th baron, See also:grandson of the 1st Lord Herbert in 1691. In 1694, however, it was revived in favour of Henry Herbert (1654-1709), son of Sir Henry Herbert (1595-1673), See also:brother of the 1st Lord Herbert of Cherbury.

Sir Henry was See also:

master of the See also:revels to Charles I. and Charles II., being busily employed in See also:reading and licensing plays and in supervising all kinds of public entertainments. He died in April 1673; his son Henry died in See also:January 1709, when the latter's son Henry became 2nd Lord Herbert of Cherbury of the second creation. He died without issue in April 1738, and again the barony became extinct. In 1743 it was revived for Henry See also:Arthur Herbert (c. 1703-1772), who five years later was created See also:earl of See also:Powis. This nobleman was a great-grandson of the 2nd Lord Herbert of Cherbury of the first creation, and since his See also:time the barony has been held by the earls of Powis. Lord Herbert's cousin, Sir Edward Herbert (c. 1591-1657), was a member of parliament under James I. and Charles I. Having become See also:attorney-See also:general he was instructed by Charles to take proceedings against some members of parliament who had been concerned in the passing of the See also:Grand Remonstrance; the only result, however, was Herbert's own See also:impeachment by the See also:House of See also:Commons and his imprisonment. Later in life he was with the exiled royal family in See also:Holland and in See also:France, becoming lord keeper of the great See also:seal to Charles I[., an See also:office which he had refused in 1645. He died in Paris in See also:December 1657. One of Herbert's son was Arthur Herbert, earl of See also:Torrington, and another was Sir Edward Herbert .

(c. 1648-1698), titular earl of See also:

Portland, who was made chief See also:justice of the king's See also:bench in 1685 in See also:succession to Lord See also:Jeffreys. . It was Sir Edward who declared for the royal See also:prerogative in the See also:case of Godden v. See also:Hales, asserting that the See also:kings of England, being See also:sovereign princes, could dispense with particular See also:laws in particular cases. After the See also:escape of James II. to France this king made Herbert his lord See also:chancellor and created him earl of Portland, although he was a See also:Protestant and had exhibited a certain amount of See also:independence during 1687. The first Lord Herbert's real claim to fame and remembrance is derived from his writings. Herbert's first and most important See also:work is the De veritate grout distinguitur a revelatione, a verisimili, a rossibili, et a falso (Paris, 1624; London, 1633; translated into French 1639, but never into English; a MS. in add. See also:MSS. 7081. Another, See also:Sloane HISS. 3957, has the author's See also:dedication to his brother See also:George in his own See also:hand, dated 1622). It combines a theory of knowledge with a partial See also:psychology, a methodology for the investigation of truth, and a See also:scheme of natural See also:religion.

The author's method is prolix and often far from clear; the See also:

book is no compact See also:system, but it contains the See also:skeleton and much of the soul of a See also:complete See also:philosophy. Giving up all past theories as useless, Herbert professedly endeavours to constitute a new and true system. Truth, which he defines as a just conformation of the faculties with one another and with their objects, he distributed into four classes or stages: (I) truth in the thing or the truth of the See also:object; (2) truth of the See also:appearance; (3) truth of the See also:apprehension (conceptus); (4) truth of the See also:intellect. The faculties of the mind are as numerous as the See also:differences of their objects, and are accordingly innumerable; but they may be arranged in four See also:groups. The first and fundamental and most certain See also:group is the Natural See also:Instinct, to which belong the ,cocvai gvvoLae, the notitiae communes, which are innate, of divine origin and indisputable. The second group, the next in certainty, is the sensus internus (under which See also:head Herbert discusses amongst others love, hate, fear, See also:conscience with its communis notitia, and See also:free will); the third is the sensus externus; and the See also:fourth is discursus, reasoning, to which, as being the least certain, we have recourse when the other faculties fail. The ratiocinative faculties proceed by See also:division and See also:analysis, by questioning, and are slow and See also:gradual in their See also:movement; they take aid from the other faculties, those of the instinctus naturalis being always the final test. Herbert's categories or questions to be used in investigation are ten in number whether (a thing is), what, of what sort, how much, in what relation, how, when, where, whence, wherefore. No See also:faculty, rightly used, can err " even in dreams "; badly exercised, reasoning becomes the source of almost all our errors. The discussion of the notitiae communes is the most characteristic part of the book. The exposition of them, though highly dogmatic, is at times strikingly Kantian in substance. " So far are these elements or sacred principles from being derived from experience or observation that without some of them, or at least some one of them, we can neither experiencenor even observe." Unless ,we See also:felt driven by them to explore the nature of things, " it would never occur to us to distinguish one thing from another." It cannot be said that Herbert proves the existence of the See also:common notions; he does not deduce them or even give any See also:list of them.

But each faculty has its common notion; and they may be distinguished by six marks, their priority, independence, universality, certainty, See also:

necessity (for the well-being of See also:man), and immediacy. See also:Law is based on certain common notions; so is religion. Though Herbert expressly defines the See also:scope of his book as dealing with the intellect, not faith, it is the common notions of religion he has illustrated most fully; and it is See also:plain that it is in this part of his system that he is chiefly interested.. The common notions of religion are the famous five articles, which became the See also:charter of the English deists (see DE1SM). There is little polemic against the received See also:form of Christiapity, but Herbert's attitude towards the Church's See also:doctrine is distinctly negative, and he denies See also:revelation except to the individual soul. In the De religione gentilium (completed 1645, published See also:Amsterdam, 1663, translated into English by W. See also:Lewis, London, 1705) he gives what may be called, in See also:Hume's words, "a natural See also:history of religion." By examining the See also:heathen religions Herbert finds, to his great delight, the universality of his five great articles, and that these are clearly recognizable under their absurdities as they are under the See also:rites, ceremonies and polytheism invented by sacerdotal superstition. The same vein is maintained in the tracts De cansis errorum, an unfinished work on logical fallacies, Religio laici, and Ad sacerdotes de religione laici (1645). In the De veritate Herbert produced the first purely metaphysical See also:treatise. written by an Englishman, and in the De religione gentilium one of the earliest studies extant in See also:comparative See also:theology; while both his metaphysical speculations and his religious views are throughout distinguished by the highest originality and provoked considerable controversy. His achievements in See also:historical See also:writing are vastly inferior, and vitiated by See also:personal aims and his preoccupation to gain the royal favour. Herbert's first historical work is the Expeditio Buckinghami duds (published in a Latin See also:translation in 1656 and in the See also:original English by the earl of Powis for the Philobiblon Society in 186o), a See also:defence of Buckingham's conduct of the See also:ill-fated expedition of 1627. Phe Life and Raigne of King Henry VIII.

(1649) derives its chief value from its See also:

composition from original documents, but is ill-proportioned, and the author See also:judges the See also:character and statesmanship of Henry with too obvious a partiality. His poems, published in 1665 (reprinted and edited by J. Churton See also:Collins in 1881), show him in general a faithful See also:disciple of See also:Donne, obscure and uncouth. His satires are miserable compositions, but a few of his lyrical verses show See also:power of reflection and true See also:inspiration, while his use of the See also:metre afterwards employed by See also:Tennyson in his " In Memoriam " is particularly happy and effective. His Latin poems are See also:evidence of his scholarship. Three of these had appeared together with the De causis errorum in 1645. To these See also:works must be added A See also:Dialogue between a See also:Tutor and a See also:Pupil (1768; a treatise on See also:education, MS. in the Bodleian Library); a treatise on the king's supremacy in the Church (MS. in the See also:Record Office and at See also:Queen's College, Oxford), and his well-known auto-See also:biography, first published by See also:Horace See also:Walpole in 1764, a naive and amusing narrative, too much occupied, however, with his duels and amorous adventures, to the exclusion of more creditable incidents in his career, such as his contributions to philosophy and history, his intimacy with Donne, See also:Ben See also:Jonson, See also:Selden and See also:Carew, See also:Casaubon, Gassendi and See also:Grotius, or his See also:embassy in France, in relation to which he only described the splendour of his See also:retinue and his social triumphs.

End of Article: HERBERT OF CHERBURY, EDWARD HERBERT, BARON (1583-1648)

Additional information and Comments

There are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click, and select "copy." Then paste it into your website, email, or other HTML.
Site content, images, and layout Copyright © 2006 - Net Industries, worldwide.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.

Links to articles and home page are always encouraged.

[back]
HERBERT (FAMILY)
[next]
HERBERT OF LEA, SIDNEY HERBERT, 1ST BARON (181b-186...