Online Encyclopedia

Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.

JONSON

Online Encyclopedia
Originally appearing in Volume V15, Page 507 of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica.
Spread the word: del.icio.us del.icio.us it!

JONSON , See also:

BEN' (1573-1637), See also:English dramatist, was See also:born, probably in See also:Westminster, in the beginning of the See also:year 1573 (or possibly, if he reckoned by the unadopted See also:modern See also:calendar, 1572; see Castelain, p. 4, See also:note 1). By the poet's See also:account his grandfather had been a See also:gentleman who "came from" See also:Carlisle, and originally, the See also:grandson thought, from Annandale. His arms, " three spindles or rhombi," are the See also:family See also:device of the Johnstones of Annandale, a _fact which confirms his assertion of Border descent. Ben Jonson further related that he was born a See also:month after the See also:death of his See also:father, who, after suffering in See also:estate and See also:person under See also:Queen See also:Mary, had in the end " turned See also:minister." Two years after the See also:birth of her son the widow married again; she may be supposed to have loved him in a passionate way See also:peculiar to herself, since on one occasion we find her revealing an almost ferocious determination to See also:save his See also:honour at the cost of both his See also:life and her own. Jonson's stepfather was a See also:master bricklayer, living in See also:Hartshorn See also:Lane, near Charing See also:Cross, who provided his stepson with the See also:foundations of a See also:good See also:education. After attending a private school in St See also:Martin's Lane, the boy was sent to Westminster School at the expense, it is said, of See also:William See also:Camden. Jonson's gratitude for an education to which in truth he owed an almost inestimable See also:debt concentrated itself upon the " most See also:reverend See also:head " of his benefactor, then second and afterwards head master of the famous school, and the See also:firm friend of his See also:pupil in later life. After reaching the highest See also:form at Westminster, Jonson is stated, but on unsatisfactory See also:evidence, to have proceeded to See also:Cambridge—according to See also:Fuller, to St See also:John's See also:College. (For reasons in support of the tradition that he was a member of St John's College, see J. B. Mullinger, the See also:Eagle, No. See also:xxv.) He says, however, himself that he studied at neither university, but was put to a See also:trade immediately on leaving school.

He soon had enough of the trade, which was no doubt his father's bricklaying, for See also:

Henslowe in See also:writing to See also:Edward Alleyne of his affair with See also:Gabriel See also:Spenser calls him " bergemen [sic] Jonson, bricklayer." Either before or after his See also:marriage—more probably before, as See also:Sir See also:Francis See also:Vere's three English regiments were not removed from the See also:Low Countries till 1592—he spent some See also:time in that See also:country soldiering, much to his own subsequent See also:satisfaction when the days of self-conscious retrospect arrived, but to no further purpose beyond that of seeing something of the See also:world. Ben Jonson married not later than 1592. The registers of St Martin's See also:Church See also:state that his eldest daughter Maria died in See also:November 1593 when she was, Jonson tells us (See also:epigram 22), only six months old. His eldest son See also:Benjamin died of the See also:plague 1 His See also:Christian name of Benjamin was usually abbreviated by himself and his contemporaries; and thus, in accordance with his famous See also:epitaph, it will always continue to be abbreviated.ten years later (epigram 45). (A younger Benjamin died in 1635.) His wife Jonson characterized to See also:Drummond as "a See also:shrew, but honest "; and for a See also:period (undated) of five years he preferred to live without her, enjoying the hospitality of See also:Lord Aubigny (afterwards See also:duke of See also:Lennox). See also:Long burnings of oil among his books, and long spells of recreation at the See also:tavern, such as Jonson loved, are not the most favoured accompaniments of family life. But Jonson was no stranger to the tenderest of affections: two at least of the several See also:children whom his wife See also:bore to him he commemorated in touching little tributes of See also:verse; nor in speaking of his lost eldest daughter did he forget " her See also:mother's tears." By the See also:middle of 1597 we come across further documentary evidence of him at See also:home in See also:London in the shape of an entry in See also:Philip Henslowe's See also:diary (See also:July 28) of 3S. 6d. " received of Bengemenes Johnsones See also:share." He was therefore by this time— when See also:Shakespeare, his See also:senior by nearly nine years, was already in prosperous circumstances and good esteem— at least a See also:regular member of the acting profession, with a fixed engagement in the lord See also:admiral's See also:company, then performing under Henslowe's management at the See also:Rose. Perhaps he had previously acted at the See also:Curtain (a former See also:house of the lord admiral's men), and " taken mad Jeronimo's See also:part " on a See also:play-See also:wagon in the high-way. This latter See also:appearance, if it ever took See also:place, would, as was pointed out by See also:Gifford, probably have been in See also:Thomas See also:Kyd's See also:Spanish Tragedy, since in The First Part of Jeronimo Jonson would have had, most inappropriately, to dwell on the " smallness " of his " bulk." He was at a subsequent date (1601) employed by Henslowe to write up The Spanish Tragedy, and this fact may have given rise to See also:Wood's See also:story of his performance as a stroller (see, however, Fleay, The English See also:Drama, ii. 29, 30).

Jonson's additions, which were not the first changes made in the, play, are usually supposed to be those printed with The Spanish Tragedy in the edition of 1602; See also:

Charles See also:Lamb's doubts on the subject, which were shared by See also:Coleridge, seem an instance of that subjective See also:kind of See also:criticism which it is unsafe to follow when the See also:external evidence to the contrary is so strong. According to See also:Aubrey, whose statement must be taken for what it is See also:worth, " Jonson was never a good actor, but an excellent instructor." His physique was certainly not well adapted to the histrionic conditions of his—perhaps of any—See also:day; but, in any See also:case, it was not long before he found his place in the organism of his company. In 1597, as we know from Henslowe, Jonson undertook to write a play for the lord admiral's men; and in the following year he was mentioned by See also:Meres in his Palladis Tamia as one of " the best for tragedy," without any reference to a connexion on his part with the other See also:branch of the drama. Whether this was a criticism based on material evidence or an unconscious slip, Ben Jonson in the same year 1598 produced one of the most famous of English comedies, Every See also:Man in his See also:Humour, which was first acted—probably in the earlier part of See also:September—by the lord See also:chamberlain's company at the Curtain. Shakespeare was one of the actors in Jonson's See also:comedy, and it is in the See also:character of Old Knowell in this very play that, according to a bold but ingenious guess, he is represented in the See also:half-length portrait of him in the See also:folio of 1623, beneath which were printed Jonson's lines concerning the picture. Every Man in his Humour was published in 16o1; the See also:critical See also:prologue first appears in the folio of 1616, and there are other divergences (see Castelain, appendix A). After the Restoration the play was revived in 1751 by See also:Garrick (who acted Kitely) with alterations, and long continued to be known on the See also:stage. It was followed in the same year by The Case is Altered, acted by the children of the queen's See also:revels, which contains a satirical. attack upon the See also:pageant poet, See also:Anthony See also:Munday. This comedy, which was not included in the folio See also:editions, is one of intrigue rather than of character; it contains obvious reminiscences of Shylock and his daughter. The earlier of these two comedies was indisputably successful. Before the year 1598 was out, however, Jonson found himself in See also:prison and in danger of the gallows. In a See also:duel, fought on the 22nd of September in Hogsden See also:Fields, he had killed an actor of Henslowe's company named Gabriel Spenser.

The See also:

quarrel with Henslowe consequent on this event may account for the produc- Either on its performance or on its appearing in See also:print in 16o5 tion of Every Man in his Humour by the See also:rival company. In prison Jonson was visited by a See also:Roman See also:Catholic See also:priest, and the result (certainly See also:strange, if Jonson's parentage is considered) was his See also:conversion to the Church of See also:Rome, to which he adhered for twelve years. Jonson was afterwards a diligent student of divinity; but, though his mind was religious, it is not probable that its natural See also:bias much inclined it to dwell upon See also:creeds and their controversies. He pleaded guilty to the See also:charge brought against him, as the rolls of See also:Middlesex sessions show; but, after a See also:short imprisonment, he was released by benefit of See also:clergy, forfeiting his " goods and chattels," and being branded on his See also:left thumb. The affair does not seem to have affected his reputation; in 1599 he is found back again at See also:work for Henslowe, receiving together with See also:Dekker, See also:Chettle and " another gentleman," See also:earnest-See also:money for a tragedy (undiscovered) called See also:Robert II., See also:King of Scots. In the same year he brought out through the lord chamberlain's company (possibly already at the Globe, then newly built or See also:building) the elaborate comedy of Every Man out of his Humour (See also:quarto 1600; fol. 1616)—a play subsequently presented before Queen See also:Elizabeth. The See also:sunshine of See also:court favour, rarely diffused during her reign in rays otherwise than figuratively See also:golden, was not to bring any material comfort to the most learned of her dramatists, before there was laid upon her the inevitable See also:hand of which his courtly See also:epilogue had besought death to forget the use. Indeed, of his Cynthia's Revels, performed by the See also:chapel children in 1600 and printed with the first See also:title of The See also:Fountain of Self-Love in 16o1, though it was no doubt primarily designed as a compliment to the queen, the most marked result had been to offend two playwrights of note—Dekker, with whom he had formerly worked in company, and who had a healthy if rough grip of his own; and See also:Marston, who was perhaps less dangerous by his strength than by his versatility. According to Jonson, his quarrel with Marston had begun by the latter attacking his morals, and in the course of it they came to blows, and might have come to worse. In Cynthia's Revels, Dekker is generally held to be satirized as See also:Hedon, and Marston as Anaides (Fleay, however, thinks Anaides is Dekker, and Hedon See also:Daniel), while the character of Crites most assuredly has some features of Jonson himself. Learning the intention of the two writers whom he had satirized, or at all events of Dekker, to wreak See also:literary vengeance upon him, he anticipated them in The Poetaster (16or), again played by the children of the queen's chapel at the Blackfriars and printed in 1602; Marston and Dekker are here ridiculed respectively as the aristocratic Crispinus and the vulgar See also:Demetrius.

The play was completed fifteen See also:

weeks after its See also:plot was first conceived. It is not certain to what the proceedings against author and play before the lord See also:chief See also:justice, referred to in the See also:dedication of the edition of 1616, had reference, or when they were instituted. Fleay's supposition that the " purge," said in the Returne from See also:Parnassus (Pt. II. See also:act 1v. sc. iii.) to have been administered by Shakespeare to Jonson in return for See also:Horace's " pill to the poets " in this piece, consisted of See also:Troilus and Cressida is supremely ingenious, but cannot be examined here. As for Dekker, he retaliated on The Poetaster by the Satiromastix, or The Untrussing of the Humorous Poet (1602). Some more last words were indeed attempted on Jonson's part, but in the A pologetic See also:Dialogue added to The Poetaster in the edition of 1616, though excluded from that of 16o2, he says he intends to turn his See also:attention to tragedy. This intention he apparently carried out immediately, for in 16o2 he received Do from Henslowe for a play, entitled See also:Richard Crookbacke, now lost—unfortunately so, for purposes of comparison in particular, even if it was only, as Fleay conjectures, " an alteration of See also:Marlowe's play." According to a statement by See also:Overbury, See also:early in 1603, " Ben See also:Johnson, the poet, now lives upon one Townesend," supposed to have been the poet and masque-writer See also:Aurelian See also:Townshend. at one time steward to the 1st See also:earl of See also:Salisbury, " and scornes the world." To his other early See also:patron, Lord Aubigny, Jonson dedicated the first of his two extant tragedies, See also:Sejanus, produced by the king's servants at the Globe See also:late in r6o3, Shakespeare once more taking a part in the performance. Jonson was called before the privy See also:council by the Earl of See also:Northampton. But it is open to question whether this was the occasion on which, according to Jonson's statement to Drummond, Northampton " accused him both of popery and See also:treason " (see Castelain, Appendix C). Though, for one See also:reason or another, unsuccessful at first, the endurance of its reputation is attested by its performance, in a See also:German version by an Englishman, John See also:Michael Girish, at the court of the grandson of See also:James I. at See also:Heidelberg. When the reign of James I. opened in See also:England and an adulatory See also:loyalty seemed See also:intent on showing that it had not exhausted itself at the feet of Gloriana, Jonson's well-stored See also:brain and ready See also:pen had their share in devising and executing ingenious See also:variations on the theme " Welcome—since we cannot do without thee!" With extraordinary promptitude his See also:genius,which, far from being " ponderous " in its operations, was singularly See also:swift and flexible in adapting itself to the demands made upon it, met the new See also:taste for masques and entertainments—new of course in degree rather than in kind—introduced with the new reign and fostered by both the king and his See also:consort. The pageant which on the 7th of May 1603 bade the king welcome to a See also:capital dissolved in joy was partly of Jonson's, partly of Dekker's, devising; and he was able to deepen and diversify the impression by the See also:composition of masques presented to James I. when entertained at houses of the See also:nobility.

The Satyr (1603) was produced on one of these occasions, Queen See also:

Anne's sojourn at Althorpe, the seat of Sir Robert See also:Spencer, afterwards Lord Althorpe, who seems to have previously bestowed some patronage upon him. The See also:Penates followed on May-day 1604 at the house of Sir William See also:Cornwallis at See also:Highgate, and the queen herself with her ladies played his Masque of Blackness at See also:Whitehall in 1605. He was soon occasionally employed by the court itself—already in 16o6 in See also:conjunction with Inigo See also:Jones, as responsible for the " See also:painting and See also:carpentry "—and thus speedily showed himself master in a See also:species of composition for which, more than any other English poet before See also:Milton, he secured an enduring place in the See also:national poetic literature. Personally, no doubt, he derived considerable material benefit from the new See also:fashion—more especially if his statement to Drummond was anything like correct, that out of his plays (which may be presumed to mean his See also:original plays) he had never gained a couple of See also:hundred pounds. Good humour seems to have come back with good See also:fortune. See also:Joint employment in The King's Entertainment (1604) had reconciled him with Dekker; and with Marston also, who in 1604 dedicated to him his Malcontent, he was again on pleasant terms. When, therefore, in 1604 Marston and See also:Chapman (who, Jonson told Drummond, was loved of him, and whom he had probably honoured as " See also:Virgil " in The Poetaster, and who-has, though on doubtful grounds, been supposed to have collaborated in the original Sejanus) produced the excellent comedy of Eastward Ho, it appears to have contained some contributions by Jonson. At all events, when the authors were arrested on account of one or more passages in the play which were deemed insulting to the Scots, he " voluntarily imprisoned himself " with them. They were soon released, and a banquet at his expense, attended by Camden and See also:Selden, terminated the incident. If Jonson is to be believed, there had been a See also:report that the prisoners were to have their ears and noses cut, and, with reference apparently to this peril, " at the midst of the feast his old mother drank to him, and showed him a See also:paper which she had' intended (if the See also:sentence had taken See also:execution) to have mixed in the prison among his drink, which was full of lusty strong See also:poison; and that she was no See also:churl, she told him, she minded first to have drunk of it her-self." Strange to say, in 1605 Jonson and Chapman, though the former, as he averred, had so "attempered " his See also:style as to have " given no cause to any good man of grief," were again in prison on account of " a play "; but they appear to have been once more speedily set See also:free, in consequence of a very manly and dignified See also:letter addressed by Jonson to the Earl of Salisbury. As to the relations between Chapman and Jonson, illustrated by newly discovered letters, see See also:Bertram See also:Dobell in the See also:Athenaeum No. 3831 (See also:March 30, 1go1), and the comments of Castelain.

He thinks that the play in question, in which both Chapman and Jonson took part, was Sir Gyles Goosecappe, and that the last imprisonment of the two poets was shortly after the See also:

discovery of the See also:Gunpowder Plot. In the mysterious See also:history of the See also:Gun-See also:powder Plot Jonson certainly had some obscure part. On the 7th of November, very soon after the discovery of the See also:conspiracy, the council appears to have sent for him and to have asked him, as a loyal Roman Catholic, to use his good offices in inducing the priests to do something required by the council—one hardly likes to conjecture it to have been some tampering with the secrets of See also:confession. In any case, the negotiations See also:fell through, because the priests declined to come forth out of their hiding-places to be negotiated with—greatly to the wrath of Ben Jonson, who declares in a letter to Lord Salisbury that " they are all so enweaved in it that it will make 500 gentlemen less of the See also:religion within this See also:week, if they carry their understanding about them." Jonson himself, however, did not declare his separation from the Church of Rome for five years longer, however much it might have been to his See also:advantage to do so. His See also:powers as a dramatist were at their height during the earlier half of the reign of James I.; and by the year 1616 he had produced nearly all the plays which are worthy of his genius. They include the tragedy of See also:Catiline (acted and printed 1611), which achieved only a doubtful success, and the comedies of Volpone, or the See also:Fox (acted 16o5 and printed in 1607 with a dedication " from my house in the Blackfriars "), Epicoene, or the Silent Woman (1609; entered in the Stationers' See also:Register 161o), the Alchemist(i6io; printed in 161o), See also:Bartholomew See also:Fair and The See also:Devil is an See also:Ass (acted respectively in 1614 and 1616). During the same period he produced several masques, usually in connexion with Inigo Jones, with whom, however, he seems to have quarrelled already in this reign, though it is very doubtful whether the architect is really intended to be ridiculed in Bartholomew Fair under the character of Lanthorn See also:Leatherhead. Littlewit, according to Fleay, is Daniel. Among the most attractive of his masques maybe mentioned the Masque of Blackness (16o6), the Masque of Beauty (16o8), and the Masque of Queens (1609), described by See also:Swinburne as " the most splendid of all masques " and as " one of the typically splendid monuments or trophies of English literature." In 1616 a modest See also:pension of See also:ioo marks a year was conferred upon him; and possibly this sign of royal favour may have encouraged him to the publication of the first See also:volume of the folio collected edition of his See also:works (1616), though there are indications that he had contemplated its See also:production, an exceptional task for a playwright of his times to take in hand, as early as 1612. He had other patrons more bountiful than the See also:Crown, and for a brief space of time (in 1613) had travelled to See also:France as See also:governor (without apparently much moral authority) to the eldest son of Sir See also:Walter See also:Raleigh, then a state prisoner in the See also:Tower, for whose society Jonson may have gained a liking at the Mermaid Tavern in Cheapside, but for whose See also:personal character he, like so many of his contemporaries, seems to have had but small esteem. By the year 1616 Jonson seems to have made up his mind to cease writing for the stage, where neither his success nor his profits had equalled his merits and expectations. He continued to produce masques and entertainments when called upon; but he was attracted by many other literary pursuits, and had already accomplished enough to furnish plentiful materials for retrospective discourse over See also:pipe or See also:cup.

He was already entitled to lord it at the Mermaid, where his See also:

quick antagonist in earlier wit-combats (if Fuller's famous description be See also:authentic) no longer appeared even on a visit from his comfortable See also:retreat at See also:Stratford. That on the other hand Ben carried his wicked See also:town habits into See also:Warwickshire, and there, together with See also:Drayton, made Shakespeare drink so hard with them as to bring upon him-self the fatal See also:fever which ended his days, is a See also:scandal with which we may fairly refuse to load Jonson's memory. That he had a share in the preparing for the See also:press of the first folio of Shakespeare, or in the composition of its See also:preface, is of course a See also:mere conjecture. It was in the year 1618 that, like Dr See also:Samuel Johnson a See also:century and a half afterwards, Ben resolved to have a real See also:holiday for once, and about midsummer started for his ancestral country, See also:Scotland. He had (very heroically for a man of his habits) determined to make the See also:journey on See also:foot; and he was speedily followed by John See also:Taylor, the See also:water-poet, who still further handicapped himself by the See also:condition that he would accomplish the See also:pilgrimage without a See also:penny in his See also:pocket. Jonson, who put money in his good friend's See also:purse when he came up with him at See also:Leith, spent more than a year and a half in the hospitable Low-lands, being solemnly elected a See also:burgess of See also:Edinburgh, and on another occasion entertained at a public banquet there. But the best-remembered hospitality which he enjoyed was that of the learned Scottish poet, William Drummond of Hawthornden, to which we owe the so-called Conversations. In these famous jottings, the work of no extenuating hand, Jonson lives for us to this day, delivering his censures, terse as they are, in an expansive See also:mood whether of praise or of blame; nor is he at all generously described in the postscript added by his fatigued and at times irritated See also:host as " a See also:great See also:lover and praiser of himself, a contemner and scorner of others." A poetical account of this journey, " with all the adventures," was burnt with Jonson's library. After his return to England Jonson appears to have resumed his former course of life. Among his See also:noble patrons and patronesses were the countess of See also:Rutland (See also:Sidney's daughter) and her See also:cousin See also:Lady Wroth; and in 1619 his visits to the country seats of the nobility were varied by a sojourn at See also:Oxford with Richard See also:Corbet, the poet, at See also:Christ Church, on which occasion he took up the master's degree granted to him by the university; whether he actually proceeded to the same degree granted to him at Cambridge seems unknown. He confessed about this time that he was or seemed growing " restive," i.e. lazy, though it was not long before he returned to the occasional composition of masques. The extremely spirited See also:Gipsies Metamorphosed (1621) was thrice presented before the king, who was so pleased with it as to See also:grant to the poet the reversion of the See also:office of master of the revels, besides proposing to confer upon him the honour of See also:knight-See also:hood.

This honour Jonson (hardly in deference to the memory of Sir See also:

Petronel Flash) declined; but there was- no reason why he should not gratefully accept the increase of his pension in the same year (1621) to f2oo—a temporary increase only, inasmuch as it still stood at Too marks when afterwards augmented by Charles I. - The See also:close of King James I.'s reign found the foremost of its poets in anything but a prosperous condition. It would be unjust to hold the See also:Sun, the See also:Dog, the Triple See also:Tun, or the Old Devil with its See also:Apollo See also:club-See also:room, where Ben's supremacy must by this time have become established, responsible for this result; taverns were the clubs of that day, and a man of letters is not considered lost in our own because he haunts a smoking-room in See also:Pall Mall. Disease had weakened the poet's strength, and the burning of his library, as his Execration upon See also:Vulcan sufficiently shows, must have been no mere transitory trouble to a poor poet and See also:scholar. Moreover he cannot but have See also:felt, from the time of the See also:accession of Charles I. early in 1625 onwards, that the royal patronage would no longer be due in part to anything like intellectual sympathy. He thus thought it best to recur to the surer way of writing for the stage, and in 1625 produced, with no faint See also:heart, but with a very clear anticipation of the comments which would be made upon the reappearance of the " huge, overgrown play-maker," The See also:Staple of See also:News, a comedy excellent in some respects, but little calculated to become popular. It was not printed till 163r. Jonson, whose See also:habit of See also:body was not more conducive than were his ways of life to a healthy old See also:age, had a paralytic stroke in 1626, and a second in 1628. In the latter year, on the death of See also:Middleton, the See also:appointment of See also:city chronologer, with a See also:salary of ioo nobles a year, was bestowed upon him. He appears to have considered the duties of this office as purely ornamental; but in 1631 his salary was suspended until he should have presented some fruits of his labours in his place, or—as he more succinctly phrased it—" yesterday the barbarous court of aldermen have withdrawn their chandlerly pension for verjuice and See also:mustard, £33, 6s. 8d." After being in 1628 arrested by See also:mistake on the utterly false charge of having written certain verses in approval of the assassination of See also:Buckingham, he was soon allowed to return to Westminster, where it would appear from a letter of his " son and contiguous See also:neighbour," James See also:Howell, he was living in 1629, and about this time narrowly escaped another conflagration. In the same year (1629) he once more essayed the stage with the comedy of The New See also:Inn, which was actually, and on its own merits not unjustly, damned on the first performance.

It was printed in 1631, " as it was never acted but most negligently played "; and Jonson defended himself against his critics in his spirited See also:

Ode to Himself. The epilogue to The New Inn having dwelt not without dignity upon the neglect which the poet had experienced at the hands of " king and queen," King Charles immediately sent the unlucky author a See also:gift of £See also:loo, and in response to a further See also:appeal increased his See also:standing salary to the same sum, with the addition of an See also:annual tierce of See also:canary —the poet-See also:laureate's customary royal gift, though this designation of an office, of which Jonson discharged some of what became the See also:ordinary functions, is not mentioned in the See also:warrant dated the 26th of March 163o. In 1634, by the king's See also:desire, Jonson's salary as chronologer to the city was again paid. To his later years belong the comedies, The Magnetic Lady (1632) and The See also:Tale of a Tub (1633), both printed in 1640, and some masques, none of which met with great success. The patronage of liberal-minded men, such as the earl, afterwards duke, of See also:Newcastle—by whom he must have been commissioned to write his last two masques Love's Welcome at Welbeck (1633) and Love's Welcome at See also:Bolsover (1634)—and See also:Viscount See also:Falkland, was not wanting, and his was hardly an instance in which the fickleness of time and taste could have allowed a literary See also:veteran to end his career in neglect. He was the acknowledged chief of the English world of letters, both at the festive meetings where he ruled the roast among the younger authors whose See also:pride it was to be " sealed of the tribe of Ben, " and by the avowal of See also:grave writers, old or See also:young, not one of whom would have ventured to dispute his titular pre-See also:eminence. Nor was he to the last unconscious of the claims upon him which his position brought with it. When, nearly two years after he had lost his surviving son, death came upon the sick old man on the 6th of See also:August 1639, he left behind him an unfinished work of great beauty, the See also:pastoral drama of The Sad Shepherd (printed in 1641). For See also:forty years, he said in the prologue, he had feasted the public; at first he could scarce See also:hit its taste, but See also:patience had at last enabled it to identify itself with the working of his pen. We are so accustomed to think of Ben Jonson presiding, attentive to his own See also:applause, over a circle of younger followers and admirers that we are See also:apt to forget the hard struggle which he had passed through before gaining the crown now universally acknowledged to be his. Howell records, in the year before Ben's death, that a See also:solemn supper at the poet's own house, where the host had almost spoiled the relish of the feast by vilifying others and magnifying himself, " T. Ca.

"(Thomas See also:

Carew) buzzed in the writer's See also:ear " that, though Ben had barrelled up a great See also:deal of knowledge, yet it seemed he had not read the See also:Ethics,which, among other precepts of morality, forbid self-See also:commendation." Self-reliance is but too frequently coupled with self-consciousness, and for good and for evil self-confidence was no doubt the most prominent feature in the character of Ben Jonson. Hence the combativeness which involved him in so many quarrels in his earlier days, and which jarred so harshly upon the less militant and in some respects more pedantic nature of Drummond. But his quarrels do not appear to have entered deeply into his soul, or indeed usually to have lasted long.' He was too exuberant in his vituperations to be See also:bitter, and too outspoken to be malicious. He loved of all things to be called " honest," and there is every reason to suppose that he deserved the epithet. The old super- ' With Inigo Jones, however, in quarrelling with whom, as Howell reminds Jonson, the poet was virtually quarrelling with his See also:bread and See also:butter, he seems to have found it impossible to live permanently at See also:peace; his satirical Expostulation against the architect was published as late as 1635. Chapman's See also:satire against his old See also:associate, perhaps due to this quarrel, was left unfinished and unpublished.stition that Jonson was filled with See also:malignant envy of the greatest of his See also:fellow-dramatists, and lost no opportunity of giving expression to it, hardly needs See also:notice. Those who consider that Shakespeare was beyond criticism may find See also:blasphemy in the saying of Jonson that Shakespeare " wanted See also:art." Occasional jesting allusions to particular plays of Shakespeare may be found in Jonson, among which should hardly be included the sneer at " mouldy " See also:Pericles in his Ode to Himself. But these amount to nothing collectively, and to very little individually; and against them have to be set, not only the many pleasant traditions concerning the long intimacy between the pair, but also the lines, prefixed to the first Shakespeare folio, as noble as they are judicious, dedicated by the survivor to " the See also:star of poets," and the See also:adaptation, clearly sympathetic notwithstanding all its buts, de Shakespeare nostrat. in the Discoveries. But if Gifford had rendered no other service to Jonson's fame he must be allowed to have once for all vindicated it from the cruellest aspersion which has ever been See also:cast upon it. That in See also:general Ben Jonson was a man of strong likes and dislikes, and was wont to See also:manifest the latter as vehemently as the former, it would be idle to deny. He was at least impartial in his censures, dealing them out freely to Puritan poets like See also:Wither and (supposing him not to have exaggerated his free-spokenness) to princes of his church like See also:Cardinal du See also:Perron. And, if sensitive to attack, he seems to have been impervious to flattery—to See also:judge from the candour with which he condemned the foibles even of so enthusiastic an admirer as See also:Beaumont.

The personage that he disliked the most, and openly abused in the roundest terms, was unfortunately one with many heads and a See also:

tongue to hiss in each—no other than that " general public " which it was the fundamental mistake of his life to See also:fancy he could " See also:rail into approbation " before he had effectively secured its See also:goodwill. And upon the whole it may be said that the admiration of the few, rather than the favour of the many, has kept See also:green the fame of the most See also:independent among all the masters of an art which, in more senses than one, must please to live. Jonson's learning and See also:industry, which were alike exceptional, by no means exhausted themselves in furnishing and elaborating the materials of his dramatic works. His enemies sneered at him as a translator—a title which the preceding See also:generation was inclined to esteem the most See also:honourable in literature. But his classical scholarship shows itself in other directions besides his See also:translations from the Latin poets (the Ars poetica in particular), in addition to which he appears to have written a version of See also:Barclay's Argenis; it was likewise the basis of his English See also:Grammar, of which nothing but the rough draft remains (the MS. itself having perished in the See also:fire in his library), and in connexion with the subject of which he appears to have pursued other linguistic studies (Howell in 1629 was trying to procure him a Welsh grammar). And its effects are very visible in some of the most pleasing of his non-dramatic poems, which often display that See also:combination of See also:polish and simplicity hardly to be reached—or even to be appreciated—without some measure of classical training. Exclusively of the few lyrics in Jonson's dramas (which, with the exception of the stately choruses in Catiline, See also:charm, and perhaps may surprise, by their lightness of See also:touch), his non-dramatic works are comprised in the following collections. The See also:book of .Epigrams (published in the first folio of 1616) contained, in the poet's own words, the "ripest of his studies." His notion of an epigram was the See also:ancient, not the restricted modern one—still less that of the critic (R. C., the author of The Times' See also:Whistle) in whose See also:language, according to Jonson, "witty " was " obscene." On the whole, these epigrams excel more in encomiastic than in satiric touches, while the pathos of one or two epitaphs in the collection is of the truest kind. In the lyrics and epistles contained in the See also:Forest (also in the first folio), Jonson shows greater variety in the poetic styles adopted by him; but the subject of love, which See also:Dryden considered conspicuous by its See also:absence in the author's dramas, is similarly eschewed here. The Underwoods (not published collectively till the second and surreptitious folio) are a See also:miscellaneous See also:series, comprising, together with a few religious and a few amatory poems, a large number of epigrams, epitaphs, elegies and " odes," including both the tributes to later date, keeping in closer touch with the See also:common experience Shakespeare and several to royal and other patrons and See also:friends, besides the Execration upon Vulcan, and the characteristic ode addressed by the poet to himself. To these pieces in verse should be added the Discoveries—See also:Timber, or Discoveries made upon Men and Matters, avowedly a See also:commonplace book of aphorisms noted by the poet in his daily readings—thoughts adopted and adapted in more tranquil and perhaps more sober moods than those which gave rise to the outpourings of the Conversations at Hawthornden.

As to the critical value of these Conversations it is far from being only negative; he knew how to admire as well as how to disdain. For these thoughts, though abounding with See also:

biographical as well as general See also:interest, Jonson was almost entirely indebted to ancient writers, or (as has been shown by See also:Professor Spingarn and by See also:Percy See also:Simpson) indebted to the humanists of the See also:Renaissance (see Modern Language See also:Review, ii. 3, See also:April 1907). The extant dramatic works of Ben Jonson fall into three or, if his fragmentary pastoral drama be considered to stand by itself, into four distinct divisions. The tragedies are only two in number—Sejanus his Fall and Catiline his Conspiracy.' Of these the earlier, as is worth noting, was produced at Shakespeare's See also:theatre, in all See also:probability before the first of Shakespeare's Roman dramas, and still contains a considerable admixture of See also:rhyme in the dialogue. Though perhaps less carefully elaborated in diction than its successor, Sejanus is at least equally impressive as a highly wrought dramatic treatment of a complex historic theme. The character of Tiberius adds an See also:element of curious psychological interest on which See also:speculation has never quite exhausted itself and which, in Jonson's day at least, was wanting to the figures of Catiline and his associates. But in both plays the See also:action is powerfully conducted, and the care bestowed by the dramatist upon the great variety of characters introduced cannot, as in some of his comedies, be said to distract the interest of the reader. Both these tragedies are noble works, though the relative popularity of the subject (for conspiracies are in the long run more interesting than camarillas) has perhaps secured the preference to Catiline. Yet this play and its predecessor were alike too manifestly intended by their author to court the goodwill of what he calls the " extraordinary " reader. It is difficult to imagine that (with the aid of judicious shortenings) either could altogether See also:miss its effect on the stage; but, while Shakespeare causes us to forget, Jonson seems to wish us to remember, his authorities. The half is often greater than the whole; and Jonson, like all dramatists and, it might be added, all novelists in similar cases, has had to pay the See also:penalty incurred by too obvious a desire to underline the learning of the author.

Perversity—or would-be originality—alone could declare Jonson's tragedy preferable to his comedy. Even if the revolution which he created in the comic branch of the drama had been mistaken in its principles or unsatisfactory in its results, it would be clear that the strength of his dramatic genius See also:

lay in the See also:power of depicting a great variety of characters, and that in comedy alone he succeeded in finding a wide See also:field for the exercise of this power. There may have been no very original or very profound discovery in the See also:idea which he illustrated in Every Man in his Humour, and, as it were, technically elaborated in Every Man out of his Humour —that in many men one quality is observable which so possesses them as to draw the whole of their individualities one way, and that this phenomenon "may be truly said to be a humour." The idea of the master quality or tendency was, as has been well observed, a very considerable one for dramatist or novelist. Nor did Jonson (happily) See also:attempt to work out this idea with any excessive scientific consistency as a comic dramatist. But, by refusing to apply the See also:term " humour " (q.v.) to a mere peculiarity or affectation of See also:manners, and restricting its use to actual or implied See also:differences or distinctions of character, he broadened the whole basis of English comedy after his fashion, as See also:Moliere at a 'Of The Fall of See also:Mortimer Jonson left only a few lines behind him; but, as he also left the See also:argument of the play, factious ingenuity contrived to furbish up the relic into a See also:libel against Queen See also:Caroline and Sir Robert See also:Walpole in 1731, and to revive the contrivance by way of an insult to the princess See also:dowager of See also:Wales and Lord See also:Bute in 1762. of human life, with a lighter hand broadened the basis of See also:French and of modern Western comedy at large. It does not of.course follow that Jonson's disciples, the Bromes and the Cartwrights, always adequately reproduced the master's conception of " humorous " comedy. Jonson's wide and various See also:reading helped him to diversify the application of his theory, while perhaps at times it led him into too remote illustrations of it. Still, See also:Captain Bobadil and Captain Tucca, Macilente and Fungoso, Volpone and Mosca, and a goodly number of other characters impress themselves permanently upon the memory of those whose attention they have as a See also:matter of course commanded. It is a very futile criticism to condemn Jonson's characters as a mere series of types of general ideas; on the other hand, it is a very See also:sound criticism to See also:object, with See also:Barry See also:Cornwall, to the "multitude of characters who throw no See also:light upon the story, and lend no interest to it, occupying space that had better have been bestowed upon the See also:principal agents of the plot." In the construction of plots, as in most other respects, Jonson's at once conscientious and vigorous mind led him in the direction of originality; he depended to a far less degree than the greater part of his contemporaries (Shakespeare with the See also:rest) upon borrowed plots. But either his inventive character was occasionally at See also:fault in this respect, or his devotion to his characters often diverted his attention from a brisk conduct of his plot. Barry Cornwall has directed attention to the essential likeness in the plot of two of Jonson's best comedies, Volpone and The Alchemist; and another critic, W.

Bodham See also:

Donne, has dwelt on the difficulty which, in The Poetaster and elsewhere, Ben Jonson seems to experience in sustaining the promise of his actions. The Poetaster is, however, a play sui generis, in which the real business can hardly be said to begin till the last act. Dryden, when criticizing Ben Jonson's comedies, thought See also:fit, while allowing the old master humour and incontestable " pleasantness," to deny him wit and those ornaments thereof which See also:Quintilian reckons up under the terms See also:urbana, salsa, faceta and so forth. Such wit as Dryden has in view is the mere outward fashion or style of the day, the See also:euphuism or " sheerwit " or See also:chic which is the creed of Fastidious Brisks and of their astute purveyors at any given moment. In this Ben Jonson was no doubt defective; but it would be an See also:error to suppose him, as a comic dramatist, to have maintained towards the world around him the attitude of a philosopher, careless of mere transient externalisms. It is said that the See also:scene of his Every Man in his Humour was originally laid near See also:Florence; and his Volpone, which is perhaps the darkest social picture ever See also:drawn by him, plays at See also:Venice. Neither locality was See also:ill-chosen, but the real See also:atmosphere of his comedies is that of the native surroundings amidst which they were produced; and Ben Jonson's times live for us in his men and See also:women, his country gulls and town gulls, his alchemists and exorcists, his " skeldring " captains and whining Puritans, and the whole ragamuffin rout of his Bartholomew Fair, the comedy See also:par excellence of Elizabethan low life. After he had described the pastimes, fashionable and unfashionable, of his age, its feeble superstitions and its flaunting naughtinesses, its vapouring affectations and its lying effronteries, with an odour as of " divine tabacco " pervading the whole, little might seem to be left to describe for his " sons " and successors. Enough, however, remained; only that his followers speedily again threw manners and "humours" into an undistinguishable medley. The gift which both in his art and in his life Jonson lacked was that of exercising the See also:influence or creating the effects which he wished to exercise or create without the appearance of consciousness. Concealment never crept over his efforts, and he scorned insinuation. Instead of this, influenced no doubt by the example of the free relations between author and public permitted by See also:Attic comedy, he resorted again and again, from Every Man out of his Humour to The Magnetic Lady, to inductions and commentatory intermezzos and appendices, which, though occasionally effective by the excellence of their execution, are to be regretted as introducing into his dramas an See also:exotic and often vexatious element.

A man of letters to the very core, he never quite understood that there is and ought to be a wide difference of methods between the world of letters and the world of the theatre. The richness and versatility of Jonson's genius will never be fully appreciated by those who fail to acquaint themselves with what is preserved to us of his " masques " and cognate entertainments. He was conscious enough of his success in this direction—" next himself," he said, " only See also:

Fletcher and See also:Chap-man could write a masque:" He introduced, or at least established, the ingenious innovation of the See also:anti-masque, which See also:Schlegel has described, as a species of " See also:parody added by the poet to his device, and usually prefixed to the serious entry," and which accordingly supplies a See also:grotesque antidote to the often extravagantly imaginative See also:main conception. Jonson's learning, creative power and humorous ingenuity—combined, it should not be forgotten, with a genuine lyrical gift—all found abundant opportunities for displaying themselves in these productions. Though a growth of See also:foreign origin, the masque was by him thoroughly domesticated in the high places of English literature. He lived long enough to see the species produce its poetic masterpiece in Comas. The Sad Shepherd, of which Jonson left behind; him three acts and a prologue, is distinguished among English pastoral dramas by its freshness of See also:tone; it breathes something of the spirit of the See also:greenwood, and is not unnatural even in its supernatural element. While this piece, with its charming love-scenes between See also:Robin Hood and Maid See also:Marion, remains a fragment, another pastoral by Jonson, the May Lord (which F. G. Fleay and J. A. See also:Symonds sought to identify with The Sad Shepherd; see, however, W.

W. See also:

Greg in introduction to the See also:Louvain reprint), has been lost, and a third, of which See also:Loch See also:Lomond was intended to be the scene, probably remained unwritten. Though Ben Jonson never altogether recognized the truth of the See also:maxim that the dramatic art has properly speaking no didactic purpose, his long and laborious life was not wasted upon a barren endeavour. In tragedy he added two works of uncommon merit to our dramatic literature. In comedy his aim was higher, his effort more sustained, and his success more solid than were those of any of his See also:fellows. In the subsidiary and hybrid species of the masque, he helped to open B. new and attractive though :unddubtedly devious path in the field of dramatic literature. His intellectual endowments surpassed those of most of the great English dramatists in richness and breadth; and in See also:energy. of application he probably left them all behind. Inferior to more than one of his fellow-dramatists in the power of imaginative sympathy, he was first among the Elizabethans in the power of observation; and there is point in See also:Barrett Wendell's See also:paradox, that as a dramatist he was not really a poet but a painter. Yet it is less by these gifts, or even by his unexcelled capacity for hard work, than by the true See also:ring of manliness that he will always remain distinguished among his peers. Jonson was buried on the See also:north See also:side of the See also:nave in Westminster See also:Abbey, and the inscription, " O Rare Ben Jonson," was cut in the slab over his grave. In the beginning of the 18th century a portrait bust was put up to his memory in the Poets' Corner by Harley, earl of Oxford. Of See also:Honthorst's portrait of Jonson at Knole See also:Park there is a copy in the National Portrait See also:Gallery; another was engraved by W.

See also:

Marshall for the 164o edition of his Poems. The criticisms of Ben Jonson are too numerous for cataloguing here; among those by eminent Englishmen should be specially mentioned John Dryden s, particularly those in his ,be on Dramatic Poesy (1667–1668; revised 1684), and in the preface to An Evening's Love, or the See also:Mock Astrologer (1668), and A. C. Swinburne's Study of Ben Jonson (1889), in which, however, the significance of the Discoveries is misapprehended, See also F. G. Fleay, Biographical See also:Chronicle of the English Drama (1891), i. 311-387, ii. 1-18; C. H. See also:Herford, " Ben Jonson "(art. in See also:Diet. Nat. Biog., vol. See also:xxx., 1802) ; A.

W. See also:

Ward, History of English Dramatic Literature, 2nd ed. (1899), ii. 296--407; and for a See also:list of early impressions, W. W. Greg, List of English Plays written before; 7643 and printed before 7700 (See also:Bibliographical Society, 1900), pp. 55-58 and supplemeht 11–15. An important French work on Ben Jonson, both biographical and critical, and containing, besides many translations of scenes and passages, some valuable appendices, to more than one of which. reference has been made above, is See also:Maurice Castelain's Ben Jenson, l'homme et l'ceuvre (1907). Among See also:treatises or essays on particular aspects of his literary work may be mentioned Emil Koeppel's Quellenstudien zu den Dramen Ben Jonson's, &c. (1895); the sane writer's " Ben Jonson's Wirkung auf zeitgenossische Dramatiker," &c., in Anglicistische Forschungen, 20 (1906) ; F. E. See also:Schelling's Ben Jonson and the Classical School (1898) ; and as to his masques, A.

Soergel, See also:

Die englischen Maskenspiele (1882) and J. See also:Schmidt, Ober Ben Jonson's Maskenspiele," in Herrig's Archie, &c., See also:xxvii. 51–91. See also H. Reinsch, " Ben Jonson's Poetik and See also:seine Beziehungen zu Horaz," in Miinchener Beitrage, 16 (1899), (A. W.

End of Article: JONSON

Additional information and Comments

There are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click, and select "copy." Then paste it into your website, email, or other HTML.
Site content, images, and layout Copyright © 2006 - Net Industries, worldwide.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.

Links to articles and home page are always encouraged.

[back]
JONKOPING
[next]
JOPLIN