Online Encyclopedia

Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.

JEFFERSON

Online Encyclopedia
Originally appearing in Volume V11, Page 92 of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica.
Spread the word: del.icio.us del.icio.us it!

JEFFERSON and See also:

HAMILTON, See also:ALEXANDER. ' One incidental effect of the failure to secure See also:free See also:trade was that the See also:African slave trade, with See also:West Indies as a See also:depot for supplying the See also:American See also:market, ceased to be remunerative, and the opposition to the abolition of the trade was very much weaker than it would otherwise have been; see See also:Hochstetter, " See also:Die wirtschaftlichen and politischen See also:Motive See also:fur die Abschaffung See also:des britischen Sklavenhandels," in See also:Schmoller, Staats and Sozialwissenschaftliche Forschungen, See also:xxv. i. 37. J. Welsford, " See also:Cobden's See also:Foreign Teacher," in See also:National See also:Review (See also:December 1905).obliged to import a considerable amount of See also:corn. The exceptional weakness, as well as the exceptional strength, of See also:Great See also:Britain, among See also:European countries, made it seem desirable to adopt the principle of unrestricted commercial intercourse, not merely in the tentative See also:fashion in which it had been put in operation by See also:Huskisson, but in the thoroughgoing fashion in which it at last commended itself to the minds of See also:Peel and See also:Gladstone. The " See also:Manchester men " saw clearly where their See also:interest See also:lay; and the fashionable See also:political See also:economy was ready to demonstrate that in pursuing their own interest they were conferring the benefit of cheap clothing on all the most poverty-stricken races of mankind. It seemed probable, in the 'forties and See also:early 'fifties, that other countries would take a similar view of their own interests and would follow the example which Great Britain had set.' That they have not done so, is partly due to the fact that none of them had such a See also:direct, or such a widely diffused, interest in increased commercial intercourse as existed in Great Britain; but their reluctance has been partly the result of the See also:criticism to which the free-trade See also:doctrine has been subjected. The principles expressed in the writings of See also:Friedrich See also:List have taken such See also:firm hold, both in See also:America and in See also:Germany, that these countries have preferred to follow on the lines by which Great Britain successfully built up her See also:industrial prosperity in the 17th and 18th See also:century, rather than on those by which they have seen her striving to maintain it since 1846. Free trade was attractive as an ideal, because it appeared to offer the greatest See also:production of goods to the See also:world as a whole, and the largest See also:share of material goods to each consumer; it is See also:cosmopolitan, and it treats See also:consumption, and the interest of the consumer, as such, as the end to be considered. Hence it lies open to objections which are partly political and partly economic. As cosmopolitan, free-trade doctrine is See also:apt to be indifferent to national tradition and aspiration.

In so far indeed as patriotism is a See also:

mere aesthetic sentiment, it may be tolerated, but in so far as it implies a genuine wish and intention to preserve and defend the national habits and See also:character to the exclusion of See also:alien elements, the cosmopolitan mind will condemn it as narrow and mischievous. In the first See also:half of the 19th century there were many men who believed that national ambitions and jealousies of every See also:kind were essentially dynastic, and that if monarchies were abolished there would be fewer occasions of See also:war, so that the expenses of the business of See also:government would be enormously curtailed. For Cobden and his contemporaries it was natural to regard the national administrative institutions as maintained for the benefit of the " classes " and without much See also:advantage to the " masses." But in point of fact, See also:modern times have shown the existence in democracies of a patriotic sentiment which is both exclusive and aggressive; and the See also:burden of armaments has steadily increased. It was by means of a See also:civil war that the See also:United States attained to a consciousness of national See also:life; while such later symptoms as the See also:recent interpretations of the See also:Monroe doctrine, or the war with See also:Spain, have proved that the citizens of that democratic See also:country cannot be regarded as destitute of self-aggrandizing national ambition. In Germany the growth of militarism and nationalism have gone on See also:side by side under constitutional government, and certainly in See also:harmony with predominant public See also:opinion. Neither of these communities is willing to sink its individual conception of progress in those of the world at large; each is jealous of the intrusion of alien elements which cannot be reconciled with its own political and social See also:system. And a similar recrudescence of patriotic feeling has been observable in other countries, such as See also:Norway and See also:Hungary: the growth of national sentiment is shown, not only in the attempts to revive and popularize the use of a national See also:language, but still more decidedly in the determination to have a real See also:control over the economic life of the country. It is here that the new patriotism comes into direct conflict with the political principles of free trade as advocated by See also:Bastiat and Cobden; for them the important point was that countries, by becoming dependent on one another, would be prevented from engaging in hostilities. The new nations are ' Compatriot See also:Club Lectures (1905), p. 3o6. determined that they will not allow other countries to have such control over their economic See also:condition, as to be able to exercise a powerful See also:influence on their political life. Each is determined to be the See also:master in his own See also:house, and each has rejected free trade because of the cosmopolitanism which it involves.

Economically, free trade See also:

lays stress on consumption as the See also:chief criterion of prosperity. It is, of course, true that goods are produced with the See also:object of being consumed, and it is plausible to insist on taking this test; but it is also true that consumption and production are mutually interdependent, and that in some ways production is the more important of the two. Consumption looks to the See also:present, and the disposal of actual goods; production looks to the future, and the conditions under which goods can continue to be regularly provided and thus become available for consumption in the See also:long run. As regards the prosperity of the community in the future it is important that goods should be consumed in such a fashion as to secure that they shall be replaced or increased before they are used up; it is the amount of production rather than the amount of consumption that demands See also:consideration, and gives indication of growth or of decadence. In these circumstances there is much to be said for looking at the economic life of a country from the point of view which free-traders have abandoned or ignore. It is not on the possibilities of consumption in the present, but on the prospects of production in the future, that the continued See also:wealth of the community depends; and this principle is the only one which conforms to the modern conception of the essential requirements of sociological See also:science in its wider aspect (see See also:SOCIOLOGY). This is most obviously true in regard to countries of which the resources are very imperfectly See also:developed. If their policy is directed to securing the greatest possible comfort for each consumer in the present, it is certain that progress will be slow; the planting of See also:industries for which the country has an advantage may be a tedious See also:process; and in See also:order to stimulate national efficiency temporary See also:protection—involving what is otherwise unnecessary immediate cost to the consumer—may seem to be abundantly justified. Such a free trader as See also:John See also:Stuart See also:Mill himself admits that a See also:case may be made out for treating " See also:infant industries " as exceptions;' and if this exception be admitted it is likely to establish a precedent. After all, the various countries of the world are all in different stages of development; some are old and some are new; and even the old countries differ greatly in the progress they have made in distinct arts. The introduction of machinery has everywhere changed the conditions of production, so that some countries have lost and others have gained a See also:special advantage. Most of the countries of the world are convinced that the wisest economy is to attend to the husbanding of their resources of every kind, and to direct their policy not merely with a view to consumption in the present, but rather with regard to the possibilities of increased production in the future.

This deliberate rejection of the doctrine of free trade between nations, both in its political and economic aspects, has not interfered, however, with the steady progress of free commercial intercourse within the boundaries of a single though composite political community. " See also:

Internal free trade," though the name was not then current in this sense,was one of the burning questions in See also:England in the 17th century; it was perhaps as important a See also:factor as See also:puritanism in the fall of See also:Charles I. Internal free trade was secured in See also:France in the 18th century; thanks to Hamilton,' it was embodied in the constitution of the United States; it was introduced into Germany by See also:Bismarck; and was firmly established in the Dominion of See also:Canada and the See also:Commonwealth of See also:Australia. It became in consequence, where practicable, a See also:part of the modern federal See also:idea as usually interpreted. There are thus great areas, externally self-protecting, where free trade, as between internal divisions, has been introduced with little, if any, political difficulty, and with considerable economic advantage. These cases are sometimes quoted as justifying the expectation that the same principle is likely to be adopted sooner or later in regard to See also:external trading relations. There J. IS. Mill, Principles of Political Economy, See also:book v. See also:chapter x. § 1. 2 F. S.

See also:

Oliver, Alexander Hamilton, 142. is some See also:reason, however, for raising the question whether free trade has been equally successful, not only in its economic, but in its social results, in all the large political communities where it has been introduced. In a region like the United States of America, it is probably seen at its best; there is an immense variety of different products throughout that great See also:zone of the See also:continent, so that the mutual co-operation of the various parts is most beneficial, while the See also:standard of See also:habit and comfort is so far uniform3 throughout the whole region, and the facilities for the See also:change of employment are so many, that there is little injurious competition between different districts. In the See also:British See also:empire the conditions are reversed; but though the great self-governing colonies have withdrawn from the circle, in the See also:hope of See also:building up their own economic life in their own way, free trade is still maintained over a very large part of the British empire. Throughout this See also:area, there are very varied See also:physical conditions; there is also an extraordinary variety of races, each with its own habits, and own standard of comfort; and in these circumstances it may be doubted whether the free competition, involved in free trade, is really altogether wholesome. Within this See also:sphere the ideal of Bastiat and his followers is being realized. England, as a great manufacturing country, has more than held her own; See also:India and See also:Ireland are supplied with manufactured goods by England, and in each case the See also:population is forced to look to the See also:soil for its means of support, and for purchasing See also:power. In each case the preference for tillage, as an occupation, has rendered it comparatively easy to keep the See also:people on the See also:land; but there is some reason to believe that the See also:law of diminishing returns is already making itself See also:felt, at all events in India, and is forcing the people into deeper poverty.' It may be doubtful in the case of Ireland how far the superiority of England in industrial pursuits has prevented the development of manufactures; the progress in the last decades of the 18th century was too See also:short-lived to be conclusive; but there is at least a strong impression in many quarters that the industries of Ireland might have flourished if they had had better opportunities allowed them.' In the case of India we know that the hereditary See also:artistic skill, which had been built up in bygone generations, has been stamped out. It seems possible that the modern unrest in India, and the discontent in Ireland, may be connected with the economic conditions in these countries, on which free trade has been imposed without their consent. So far the population which subsists on the cheaper See also:food, and has the See also:lower standard of life, has been the sufferer; but the See also:mischief might operate in another fashion. The self-governing colonies at all events feel that competition in the same market between races with different See also:standards of comfort has See also:infinite possibilities of mischief. It is easy to conjure up conditions under which the standard of comfort of wage-earners in England would be seriously threatened.

Since the 9th edition of the See also:

Encyclopaedia Britannica was published it has become clear that the free-trade doctrines of Bastiat and Cobden have not been gaining ground in the world at large, and at the opening of the loth century it could hardly be said with confidence that the question was " finally settled " so far as England was concerned. As to whether the interests of Great Britain still demanded that she should continue on the See also:line she adopted in the exceptional conditions of the See also:middle of the 19th century, See also:expert opinion was conspicuously divided ;6 but there remained no longer the old See also:enthusiasm for free trade as 3 The standard is, of course, lower among the negroes and mean whites in the See also:South than in the See also:North and West. ' F. Beauclerk, " Free Trade in India," in Economic Review (See also:July 1907), xvii. 284. A. E. See also:Murray, See also:History of the Commercial and See also:Financial Relations between England and Ireland, 294. 6 For the See also:tariff reform See also:movement in See also:English politics see the See also:article on See also:CHAMBERLAIN, J. Among See also:continental writers G. Schmoller (Grundriss der allgemeinen Volkswirtschaftslehre, ii. 641) and A.

See also:

Wagner (See also:Preface to M. Schwab's Chamberlains Handelspolitik) pronounce in favour of a change, as See also:Fuchs did by anticipation. Schulze-Gaevernitz (Britischer Imperialismus and englischer Freihandel), Aubry (Etude critique de la politique Commerciale de l'Angleterre a regard de ses colonies), and See also:Blondel (La bolitique Protectionnaste en Angleterre un nouveau danger pour la France) are against it. the See also:harbinger of an See also:Utopia. The old principles of the See also:bourgeois manufacturers had been taken up by the See also:proletariat and shaped to suit themselves. See also:Socialism, like free trade, is cosmopolitan in its aims, and is indifferent to patriotism and hostile to militarism. Socialism, like free trade, insists on material welfare as the See also:primary object to be aimed at in any policy, and, like free trade, socialism tests welfare by reference to possibilities of consumption. In one respect there is a difference; throughout Cobden's attack on the governing classes there are signs of his See also:jealousy of the See also:superior status of the landed gentry, but socialism has a somewhat wider range of view and demands "equality of op{r,ortunity " with the capitalist as well. 1'3IBLIOGRAPHY.-Reference has already been made to the See also:principal See also:works which See also:deal critically with the free-trade policy. See also:Professor See also:Fawcett's Free Trade is a See also:good exposition of free-trade principles; so also is Professor Bastable's See also:Commerce of Nations. Among authors who have restated the principles with special reference to the revived controversy on the subject may be mentioned Professor W. See also:Smart, The Return to Protection, being a Re-statement of the Case for Free Trade (2nd ed., 1906), and A.

C. Pigou, Protective and Preferential Import Duties (1906). (W.

End of Article: JEFFERSON

Additional information and Comments

There are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click, and select "copy." Then paste it into your website, email, or other HTML.
Site content, images, and layout Copyright © 2006 - Net Industries, worldwide.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.

Links to articles and home page are always encouraged.

[back]
JEFFERIES, RICHARD (1848-1887)
[next]
JEFFERSON CITY (legally and officially the City.of ...