Online Encyclopedia

Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.

ADULTERATION (from Lat. adulterare, t...

Online Encyclopedia
Originally appearing in Volume V01, Page 229 of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica.
Spread the word: del.icio.us del.icio.us it!

See also:

ADULTERATION (from See also:Lat. adulterare, to See also:defile or falsify) , the See also:act of debasing a commercial commodity with the See also:object of passing it off as or under the name of a pure or genuine commodity for illegitimate profit, or the substitution of an inferior See also:article for a See also:superior one, to the detriment of the purchaser. Although the See also:term is mainly used in connexion with the falsification of articles of See also:food, drink or drugs, and is so dealt with in this article, the practice of adulteration extends to almost all manufactured products and even to unmanufactured natural substances, and (as was once suggested by See also:John See also:Bright) is an almost inseparable —though none the less reprehensible—phase of keen See also:trade competition. In its crudest forms as old as See also:commerce itself, it has progressed with the growth of knowledge and of See also:science, and is, in its most See also:modern developments, almost a branch—and that. not the least vigorous one—of applied science. From the See also:mere concealment of a piece of See also:metal or a See also:stone in a See also:loaf of See also:bread or in a lump of See also:butter, a See also:bullet in a See also:musk bag or in a piece of See also:opium, it has See also:developed into the use of See also:aniline dyes, of See also:anti-septic chemicals, of synthetic sweetening agents in foods, the manufacture of butter from See also:cocoa-nuts, of See also:lard from See also:cotton-See also:seed and of See also:pepper from See also:olive stones. Its growth and development has necessitated the employment of multitudes of scientific See also:officers charged with its detection and the passing of numerous See also:laws for its repression and See also:punishment. While for all See also:common forms of See also:fraud the common See also:law is in most cases considered strong enough, See also:special laws against the adulteration of food have been found necessary in all civilized countries. A vigorous See also:branch of chemical literature deals with it; there exist scientific See also:societies specially devoted to its study; laboratories are maintained by governments with staffs of highly trained chemists for its detection; and yet it not only develops and flourishes, but becomes more See also:general, if less virulent and dangerous to See also:health. There are numerous references to adulteration in the See also:classics. The detection of the See also:base metal by See also:Archimedes in See also:Hiero's See also:crown, by the See also:light specific gravity of the latter, is a well-known in-stance. See also:Vitruvius speaks of the adulteration of minium with See also:lime, Dioscorides of that of opium with other plant juices and with See also:gum, See also:Pliny of that of See also:flour with See also:white See also:clay. Both in See also:Rome and in See also:Athens See also:wine was often adulterated with See also:colours and flavouring agents, and inspectors were charged with looking after it. In See also:England, so far back as the reign of John (1203), a See also:proclamation was made throughout the See also:kingdom, enforcing the legal obligations of See also:assize as regards bread; and in the following reign the See also:statute (51 See also:Hen.

III. Stat. 6) entitled " the See also:

pillory and tumbrel " was framed for the See also:express purpose of protecting the public from the dishonest dealings of bakers, vintners, brewers, butchers and others. This statute is the first in which the adulteration of human food is specially noticed and prohibited; it seems to have been enforced with more or less rigour until the See also:time of See also:Anne, when it was repealed (1709). According to the See also:Liber Albus it was strictly observed in the days of See also:Edward I., for it states that: " If any See also:default shall be found in the bread of a See also:baker in the See also:city, the first time, let him be See also:drawn upon a See also:hurdle from the See also:Guildhall to his own See also:house through the See also:great See also:street where there be most See also:people assembled, and through the great streets which are most dirty, with the faulty loaf See also:hanging from his See also:neck; if a second time he shall be found committing the same offence, let him be drawn from the Guildhall through the great street of Cheepe in the manner aforesaid to the pillory, and let him be put upon the pillory, and remain there at least one See also:hour in the See also:day; and the third time that such default shall be found, he shall be drawn, and the See also:oven shall be pulled down, and the baker made to foreswear the trade in the city for ever." The assize of 1634 provides that " if there be any manner of See also:person or persons, which shall by any false wayes or meanes, sell any meale under the kinge's subjects, either by mixing it deceitfully or sell any musty or corrupted See also:meal, which may be to the hurte and infection of See also:man's See also:body, or use any false See also:weight, or any deceitful wayes or meanes, and so deceive the subject, for the first offence he shall be grievously punished, the second he shall loose his meale, for the third offence he shall suffer the See also:judgment of the pillory and the See also:fourth time he shall foreswere the See also:town wherein he dwelleth." Vintners, spicers, grocers, butchers, regrators and others were subject to the like punishment for dishonesty in their commercial dealings—it being thought that the pillory, by appealing to the sense of shame, was far more deterrent of such crimes than See also:fine or imprisonment. In the reign of Edward the See also:Confessor a knavish See also:brewer of the city of See also:Chester was taken See also:round the town in the See also:cart in which the refuse of the privies had been collected. See also:Ale-tasters had to look after the ale and test it by spilling some on to a wooden seat, sitting on the wet See also:place in their leathern breeches, the stickiness of the '" See also:residue obtained by evaporation " affording the See also:evidence of purity or otherwise. If See also:sugar had been added the taster adhered to the See also:bench; pure See also:malt See also:beer was not considered to yield an adhesive See also:extract. In 1553, the See also:lord See also:mayor of See also:London ordered a See also:jury of five or six vintners to See also:rack and draw off the suspected wine of another vintner, and to ascertain what drugs or ingredients they found in the said wine or cask to sophisticate the same. At another time eight pipes of wine were ordered to be destroyed because, on racking off, bundles of weeds, pieces of See also:sulphur match, and " a See also:kind of See also:gravel mixture sticking to the casks " had been found. Similar records have come down from the See also:continental See also:European countries. In 1390 an See also:Augsburg wine-seller was sentenced to be led out of the city with his hands See also:bound and a rope round his neck; in 1400 two others were branded and otherwise severely punished; in 1435 " were the taverner See also:Christian Corper and his wife put in a cask in which he sold false wine, and then ex-posed in the pillory.

The punishment was adjudged because they had roasted See also:

pears and put them into new sour wine, in See also:order to sweeten the wine. Some pears were hung round their necks like unto a Paternoster." In Biebrich on the See also:Rhine, in 1482, a wine-falsifier was condemned to drink six quarts of his own wine; from this he died. In Frankfurt, casks in which false wine had been found were placed with a red See also:flag on the knacker's cart, " the jailer marched before, the See also:rabble after, and when they came to the See also:river they See also:broke the casks and tumbled the stuff into the stream." In See also:France successive ordonnances from 1330 to 1672 forbade the mixing of two wines together under the See also:penalty of a fine and the See also:confiscation of the wine. Modern See also:British Legislation.—In modem times the See also:English See also:parliament has dealt frequently with the subject of food adulteration. In 1725 it was provided that " no dealer in See also:tea ormanufacturer or See also:dyer thereof, or pretending so to be, shall counterfeit or adulterate tea, or cause or procure the same to be counterfeited or adulterated, or shall alter, fabricate or manufacture tea with terra-japonica, or with any See also:drug or drugs whatsoever; nor shall mix or cause or procure to be mixed with tea any leaves other than the leaves of tea or other ingredients whatsoever, on See also:pain of forfeiting and losing the tea so counterfeited, adulterated, altered, fabricated, manufactured or mixed, and any other thing or things whatsoever added thereto, or mixed or used therewith, and also the sum of boo." Six years afterwards, in 1730–1731, a further act was passed prescribing a penalty for " sophisticating " tea; it recites that several See also:ill-disposed persons do frequently dye, fabricate or manufacture very great quantities of sloe leaves, See also:liquorice leaves, and the leaves of tea that have been before used, or the leaves of other trees, shrubs or See also:plants in See also:imitation of tea, and do likewise mix, See also:colour, stain and dye such leaves and likewise tea with terra-japonica, sugar, See also:molasses, clay, See also:logwood, and with other ingredients, and do sell and vend the same as true and real tea, to the See also:prejudice of the health of his See also:majesty's subjects, the diminution of the See also:revenue and to the ruin of the See also:fair trader. This act provides that for every See also:pound of adulterated tea found in See also:possession of any person, a sum of £10 shall be forfeited. It was followed by one passed in 1766-1767, which increased the penalty to imprisonment for not less than six nor more than twelve months. As regards See also:coffee, an act of 1718 recited that " See also:divers evil-disposed persons have at the time or soon after the roasting of coffee made use of See also:water, grease, butter or such-like materials, where-by the same is rendered unwholesome and greatly increased in weight," and a penalty of £2o is enacted. In 1803 an act refers to the addition of burnt, scorched or roasted peas, beans or other grains or See also:vegetable substances prepared in imitation of coffee or cocoa, to coffee or cocoa, and fixes the penalty for the offence at boo, but subsequently permission was given to coffee or cocoa dealers also to See also:deal in scorched or roasted See also:corn, peas, beans or parsnips whole and not ground, crushed or powdered, under certain See also:excise restrictions. An act passed in 1816 See also:relating to beer and See also:porter provides that no brewer of or dealer in or retailer of beer " shall receive or have in his possession, or make or mix with any worts or beer, any liquor, extract or other preparation for the purpose of darkening the colour of worts or beer, other than See also:brown malt, ground or unground, or shall have in his possession or use, or mix with any worts or beer any molasses, See also:honey, liquorice, See also:vitriol, See also:quassia, coculus-indiae, grains of See also:paradise, See also:guinea-pepper or opium, or any extracts of these, or any articles or preparation whatsoever for or as a substitute for malt or hops." Any person contravening was liable to a penalty of £200, and any druggist selling to any brewer or See also:retail dealer any colouring or malt substitute was to be fined £5oo. It was only in 1847 that brewers were allowed to make for their own use, from sugar, a liquor for darkening the colour of worts or beer and to use it in See also:brewing. All the laws hitherto referred to were mainly passed in the See also:interest of the inland revenue, and their See also:execution was See also:left entirely in the hands of the revenue officers.

It was but natural that they should look primarily after the dutiable articles and not after those that brought no revenue to the See also:

state. About the See also:middle of the 19th See also:century many articles, however, paid import See also:duty; butter, for instance, paid 5s. per hundredweight; See also:cheese from 1s. 6d. to as. 6d.; flour or meal of all kinds, 44d.; See also:ginger, 1os.; See also:isinglass, 5s.; and so on. Sensational and doubtless largely exaggerated statements were from time to time published concerning the food See also:supply of the nation. F. C. Accum (1769–1838) by his See also:Treatise on Adulterations of Food and Culinary Poisons (182o), and particularly an See also:anonymous writer of a See also:book entitled Deadly Adulteration and Slow Poisoning unmasked, or Disease and See also:Death in the Pot and the See also:Bottle, in which the bloodempoisoning and See also:life-destroying adulterations of wines, See also:spirits, beer, bread, flour, tea, sugar, spices; cheesemongery, pastry, See also:confectionery, medicines, &c. &c., are laid open to the public (1830), roused the public See also:attention. In 185o a physician, Dr. Arthui H. Hassall, had the happy See also:idea of looking at ground coffee through the See also:microscope.

Eminent chemists had previously found great difficulty in establishing any satisfactory chemical distinction between coffee, See also:

chicory and other adulterants of coffee; the microscope immediately showed the structural difference of the particles, however small. The results of Hassall's See also:examinations were embodied in a See also:paper which was read before the Botanical Society of London and was reported in The Times, 1850. A paper on the microscopic examination of sugar, showing the presence in that article of innumerable living mites, followed and attracted much attention. Hassall was in consequence commissioned by See also:Thomas See also:Wakley (1795-1862), the owner of the See also:Lancet, to extend his examination to other articles of food, and for a See also:period of nearly four years reports of the Lancet See also:Analytical Sanitary See also:Commission were regularly published, the names and addresses of hundreds of manufacturers and tradesmen selling adulterated articles being fearlessly given. The responsibility incurred was immense, but the assertions of the See also:journal were so well founded upon fact that they were universally accepted as accurately representing the appalling state of the food supply. As instances may be cited, that of See also:thirty-four samples of coffee only three were pure, chicory being See also:present in thirty-one, roasted corn in twelve, beans and See also:potato-flour each in one; of thirty-four samples of. chicory, fourteen were adulterated with corn, beans or acorns; of See also:forty-nine samples of bread, every one contained See also:alum; of fifty-six samples of cocoa, only eight were pure; of twenty-six milks, fourteen were adulterated; of twenty-eight See also:cayenne peppers, only four were genuine, thirteen containing red-See also:lead and one See also:vermilion; of upwards of one See also:hundred samples of coloured sugar-confectionery, fifty-nine contained chromate of lead, eleven See also:gamboge, twelve red-lead, six vermilion, nine arsenite of See also:copper and four white-lead. In consequence of the Lancet's disclosures a See also:parliamentary See also:committee was appointed in 1855, the labours of which resulted in 186o in the Adulteration of Food and Drink Act, the first act that dealt generally with the adulteration of food. The first See also:section of this enacted " that every person who shall sell any article of food or drink with which, to the knowledge of such person, any ingredient or material injurious to the health of persons eating or drinking such article has been mixed, and every person who shall sell as pure or unadulterated any article of food or drink which is adulterated and not pure, shall for every such offence, on See also:summary conviction, pay a penalty not exceeding 5 with See also:costs." In the See also:case of a second offence the name, place of See also:abode and offence might be published in the See also:newspapers at the offender's expense. As the act, however, left it optional to the See also:district authorities to appoint analysts or not, and did not provide for the See also:appointment of any officer upon whom should See also:rest the duty of obtaining samples or of prosecuting offenders, it virtually remained a dead See also:letter till 1872. 1872, when the Adulteration of Food and Drugs Act came into force, prescribing a penalty not exceeding 50 for the See also:sale of injurious food and, for a second offence, imprisonment for six months with hard labour. Inspectors were empowered to make purchases of samples to be submitted for See also:analysis, but appointment of analysts was still left optional. The See also:definition of an adulterated article given in that act was essentially that still accepted at the present time, namely, " any article of food or drink or any drug mixed with any other sub-stances, with See also:intent fraudulently to increase its weight or bulk, without See also:declaration of such admixture to any purchaser thereof before delivering the same." The See also:adoption of the act was sporadic, and, outside London and a few large towns, the number of proceedings against offenders remained exceedingly small.

Nevertheless complaints soon arose that it inflicted considerable injury and imposed heavy and undeserved penalties upon some respectable tradesmen, mainly owing to the " want of a clear understanding of what does and does not constitute adulteration," and in some cases to conflicting decisions and the inexperience of analysts. Again a parliamentary committee was appointed which took a See also:

mass of evidence, the outcome of its inquiries being the Saleof Food and Drugs Act 1875, which is in force at the present day, subject to amendments and additions made at 1875 later See also:dates. This act avoided the term "adulteration" altogether and endeavoured to give a clearer description of punishable offences: Section 6. " No person shall sell to the purchaser any article of food or any drug which is not of the nature, substance and quality of the article demanded by the purchaser under a penalty not exceeding X20; provided that an offence shall not be deemed to be committed under this section in the following cases: (1) where any See also:matter or ingredient not injurious to health has been added to the food or drug because the same is required for the See also:production or preparation thereof as an article of commerce, in a state See also:fit for See also:carriage or See also:consumption, and not fraudulently to increase the bulk, weight or measure of the food or drug, or conceal the inferior quality thereof; (2) where the food or drug is a proprietary See also:medicine, or is the subject of a patent in force and is supplied in the state required by the See also:specification of the patent; (3) where the food or drug is compounded as in the act mentioned; (4) where the food or drug is unavoidably mixed with some extraneous matter in the See also:process of collection or preparation." Section 8. " No person shall be guilty of any such offence as aforesaid in respect to the sale of an article of food or a drug mixed with any matter or ingredient not injurious to health, and not intended fraudulently to increase its bulk, weight or measure, or conceal its inferior quality, if at the time of delivering such article or drug he shall supply to the person receiving the same a See also:notice, by a See also:label distinctly and legibly written or printed on or with the article or drug, to the effect that the same is mixed." The act made the appointment of analysts compulsory upon the city of London, the vestries, See also:county See also:quarter sessions and town See also:councils or boroughs having a See also:separate See also:police See also:establishment. For the See also:protection of the vendor, samples that had been See also:purchased by the inspectors for analysis were to be offered to be divided into three parts, one to be submitted to the See also:analyst, the second to be given to the vendor to be dealt with by him as he might deem fit; and the third to be retained by the inspector, and, at the discretion of the See also:magistrate See also:hearing any See also:summons, to be submitted, in case of dispute, to the commissioners of inland revenue for analysis by the chemical laboratory at See also:Somerset House. The public analyst had to give a certificate, couched in a prescribed See also:form, to the person submitting any See also:sample for analysis, which certificate was to be taken as evidence of the facts therein stated, in order to render the proceedings as inexpensive as practicable. If the See also:defendant in any See also:prosecution could prove to the See also:satisfaction of the See also:court that he had purchased the article under a See also:warranty of genuineness, and that he sold it in the same state as when he purchased it, he was to be discharged from the prosecution, but no See also:provision was made that in that event the giver of the warranty should be proceeded against. Section 6, quoted above, gave rise to an immense amount of litigation, and already in 1879 it was found necessary to pass an amending act, making it clear that if a See also:purchase 1879. was effected by an inspector with the intent to get the purchased article analysed, he was as much " prejudiced " if obtaining a sophisticated article as a private purchaser who purchased for his own use and consumption. The amending act also dealt in some small measure with a difficulty which immediately after passing the act was found to arise in ascertaining whether any article was " of the nature, substance and quality demanded by the purchaser " — " in determining whether an offence has been committed under section 6 by selling spirits not adulterated otherwise than by the admixture of water, it shall be a See also:good See also:defence to prove that such admixture has not reduced the spirit more than twenty-five degrees under See also:proof for See also:brandy, See also:whisky or See also:rum, or thirty-five under proof for See also:gin." Almost insuperable difficulties as to the meaning of " nature, substance and quality " subsequently arose as regards every conceivable food material. As it was obviously impossible for parliament Act of 1860. to define every article, to See also:lay down limits of See also:composition within which it might vary, to specify the substances or ingredients that might enter into it, to limit the proportions of the unavoidable impurities that might be contained in it, the duty to do all this was left to the individual analysts.

An enormous number of substances had to be analysed until sufficient evidence had been accumulated for the giving of correct opinions or certificates. Endless disputes unavoidably arose, See also:

friction with manufacturers and traders, unfortunately also with the referees at the inland revenue, who for many years were altogether out of See also:touch with the analysts. Conflicting decisions come to by various benches of magistrates upon similar cases, allowing of the legal sale of an article in one district which in another had been declared illegal, rendered the position of merchants often unsatisfactory. It was not recognized by parliament until almost a quarter of a century had elapsed that it was not enough to compel See also:local authorities to get samples analysed, but that it was also the duty of parliament to lay down specific and clear instructions that might enable the officers to do their See also:work. This has only been very partially done even at the present time. A curious See also:condition of things arose out of the definition of "food " given in the act of 1875: " The term food shall include Mimi. every article used for food or drink by man, other than ties of drugs or water." It had been the practice of bakers adminls- to add alum to the flour from which bread was teat/on. manufactured, in order to whiten the bread, and to permit the use of damaged and discoloured flour. This practice had been strongly condemned by chemists and physicians, because it rendered the bread indigestible and injurious to health. Shortly after the passing of the Food Act this objectionable practice was stamped out by numerous prosecutions, and alumed bread now no longer occurs. A large trade, however, continued to be carried on in See also:baking powders consisting of alum and See also:sodium bicarbonate. It was naturally thought that, as baking See also:powder is sold with the obvious intention that it may enter into food, the vendors could also be proceeded against. The high court, however, held that, baking powder in itself not being an article of food, its sale could not be an offence under the Food Act. This See also:anomaly was removed by a later act: Under section 6 of the act of 1875 a defendant could be convicted, even if he had no guilty knowledge of the fact that the article he had sold was adulterated.

In the repealed Adulteration Act of 1872 the words " to the knowledge of " were inserted, and they were found fatal to obtaining convictions. The general See also:

rule of the law is that the See also:master is not criminally responsible for the acts of his servants if they are done without his know-ledge or authority, but under the Food Act It was held (Brown v. See also:Foot, 1892, 66 L.T. 649) that a master was liable for the watering of See also:milk by one of his servants, although he had published a warning to them that they would be dismissed if found doing so. Milk might be adulterated during transit on the See also:rail-way without the knowledge of the owner or See also:receiver, and yet the vendor was liable to conviction. When it is brought to the knowledge of a purchaser that the article sold to him is not of the nature, substance or quality he demanded, the sale is not to the prejudice of the purchaser. The notice may be given verbally or by a label supplied with the article. A common law notice may also be given. In See also:Sandys v. Small, 1878, 3 Q.B.D. 449, a publican had displayed a See also:placard within the See also:inn to the effect that the spirits sold in his establishment were watered. This was held, as it were, to See also:con-See also:tract him out of the Food Act.

Similarly, in the case of butters that had been adulterated with milk, the vendors, by giving a general notice in the See also:

shop, evaded punishment under the act. A notice, is, however, of no avail if given under section 8 of the act, if the admixture has been made for fraudulent purposes. In Liddiart v. Reece, 44 J.P. 233, 188o, an inspector asked for coffee and received a packet with a label describing it as a mixture of coffee and chicory. It was sold at the See also:price of coffee. It turned out to be a mixture containing 40% of chicory. The high court held that this was an excessive quan-tity, and was added for the purpose of fraudulently increasing the bulk or weight. In another case, however (See also:Otter v. Edgley, 1893, 57 J.P. 457), where an inspector had asked for See also:French coffee and had been supplied with a mixture containing 6o % of chicory, the article being labelled as a mixture, the high court held that there was no evidence of fraud, and, in the case of cocoa, a mixture containing as little as 30% of cocoa and 7o% of See also:starch and sugar, the label stating it to be a mixture, was held to have been legally sold (See also:Jones v. Jones, 1894, 58 J.P.

653). In this case the label notifying the admixture was hidden by a See also:

sheet of opaque white paper, nor had the purchaser's attention been called to it, but the price of the article was much See also:lower than that of pure cocoa. It is seen from these few instances, taken at See also:random out of scores, that this clause of the act was far from clear and was very variously interpreted at the courts. The warranty clause (clause 25) also gave rise to an immense amount of litigation. In the earlier high court decisions a very narrow See also:interpretation was given to the term " written warranty," but in later years a wider view prevailed. A general See also:contract to supply a pure article is not a sufficient warranty unless with every delivery there is something to identify the delivery as See also:part of the contract. An See also:invoice containing merely a description of an article as " lard " or " pepper " is not a warranty; but if there be added the words " guaranteed pure " it is a sufficient warranty. A label upon an article is not in itself a warranty, but a label bearing the words " pure " or " unadulterated," coupled with an invoice which could be identified with the label, together were held to form an effective warranty. As many thousands of samples were annually submitted by inspectors under the act to the analysts who had been appointed in 237 boroughs and districts, a very large number of cases led to disputes of law or fact, about seventy high court cases being decided within eighteen years of the passing of the act. While these cases related to a variety of different articles and conditions, See also:dairy produce, namely milk and butter, led to the greatest amount of litigation. It may seem to be a See also:simple matter to ascertain whether a vendor of milk supplies his customer with milk of the " nature, substance and quality demanded," but milk is subject to great See also:variations in composition owing to a large number of circumstances which will be considered below. Not many years after the passing of the Food Act of 1875 the sale of butter substitutes assumed very large proportions, and so seriously prejudiced dairy-farmers that, as regards these, an act was passed which was not exactly an See also:amendment of the Sale of Food and Drugs Act, although it embodied a good many provisions of that act.

It was called the See also:

Margarine Act 1887. It provided that every package of articles made in imitation of butter should be labelled " margarine " Am a. rgarine in letters 11 inches square. The vendor, however, was protected if he could show a warranty or invoice, whereas in the Sale of Food and Drugs Act he was not protected by invoice merely. Inspectors might take samples of " any butter or substitute purporting to be butter " without going through the form of purchase. The maximum penalty was raised from £20 as provided by the Food Act, to £5o in the case of a first and to £loo in the case of repeated conviction. The Margarine Act is the first statute that makes reference to and sanctions the use of preservatives, concerljing which a good deal will have to be said farther on. In the course of twenty years of See also:administration of the Food Acts so many difficulties had arisen in reference to the various points referred to, that in 1894 a select committee was appointed to inquire into the working of the various serecr commit. acts and to See also:report whether any, and if so what, amend- we, 1894. ments were desirable. During three sessions the com- mittee sat and took voluminous evidence. They reported that where the acts had been well administered they had been most beneficial in diminishing adulteration offences. Forms of adulteration which were common See also:prior to the passing of the 1875 act, such as the introduction of alum into bread and the colouring of confectionery with poisonous material, had almost entirely disappeared. A See also:close connexion had been shown to exist between the extent of adulteration and the number of articles submitted for analysis under the acts, the proportion of adulterated samples being found to diminish as the number of samples taken relatively to the See also:population increased.

Thus, in 189o, in See also:

Somersetshire one sample had been analysed for every 379 persons, the percentage of adulterated samples in those taken for analysis being as See also:low as 3.6; in See also:Gloucestershire one to 77o persons with 6.2 of adulteration; in See also:Bedfordshire one to 821 with 7.1; in See also:Derbyshire • one to 3164 with 17.1 %, and in See also:Oxford one sample to 14,963 inhabitants with no less than 41.7 % of adulterated samples. The number of samples of articles annually submitted to analysis, according to the returns obtained by the Local See also:Government See also:Board, steadily increased from the commencement onward. Whereas in 1877, 14,706 samples, and in 1883, 19,648 samples were analysed, in 1904—1905 the number was no less than 84,678, or an See also:average of one sample to 384 inhabitants for the whole See also:country. I; the five years 1877—1881 the See also:pro-portion found adulterated was 16.2 %; in the following five years ending with 1886, the percentage was 13.9; in the five years ending 1891, the percentage was 11.7; and in the See also:year 1904 the percentage was only 8.5. The select committee found that wide local See also:differences in the administration of the acts existed, and that in many parts of the country the local authorities had failed to 9xercise their See also:powers. In one See also:metropolitan district, eight members of the local authority had been convicted of offences under the acts, upon evidence obtained by their own inspector. The result was that the duties of the inspector of the acts were afterwards controlled by a committee of that local authority, who decided the cases in which prosecutions should be undertaken, and the administration of the acts was " little better than a See also:farce." No See also:power existed to compel local authorities to carry out the acts. The committee came to the conclusion that in many cases the responsibility for the adulteration of articles of food did not rest with the retailer but with the whole-sale dealer or manufacturer; that the law punished See also:petty offences and left great ones untouched; that it fined a small retailer and left the wholesale offender See also:scot See also:free. As regards warranty, they thought that the precedent created by the Margarine Act should be followed generally, and that invoices and See also:equivalent documents should have the force of warranties. They found that a considerable proportion of the food imports were adulterated, out of 890 samples of butter taken by the customs in 1895 no less than ro6 being impure, and they recommended that in addition to tea, which by section 30 of the act of 1875 was to be systematically analysed by the customs, prior to being passed for See also:distribution, samples of all food imports should be taken and examined by the customs. The committee further found that the penalties imposed under the acts had for the most part been trifling and quite insufficient to serve as deterrents, the profits derived from the sale of adulterated articles being out of pro-portion great to the insignificant fines imposed, and they recommended that for the second offence the penalty of £5 should be the minimum one, and that in respect to third or subsequent offences imprisonment without the See also:option of a fine might be inflicted. The important question of food See also:standards was considered at great length.

The See also:

absence of legal standards or See also:definitions of articles of food had occasioned great difficulty in numerous cases, but as no authority was provided by the existing acts that might See also:fix such standards, they recommended the formation of a scientific authority or court of reference composed of representatives of the laboratory of the Inland Revenue, of the Local Government Board, the Board of See also:Agriculture, the General Medical See also:Council, the See also:Institute of See also:Chemistry, the Pharmaceutical Society, of other scientific men and of the trading and manufacturing community, who should have the duty of fixing standards of quality and purity of food to be confirmed by a secretary of state. The committee's deliberations and recommendations resulted in the Sale of Food and Drugs Act 1899. This unfortunately was not a comprehensive act superseding the previous acts, but was an additional and amending one, so that at the present timefour food acts run parallel and are together in force, rendering the subject from a legal point of view one of extreme complexity. In this act the growing See also:influence of the Board of Agri- Act culture and the See also:desire to assist farmers and dairymen 189 of 1899, more decisively than previously are clearly apparent. Section r empowers the customs to take samples of consignments of imported articles of food and enjoins them to communicate to the Board of Agriculture the names of the importers of adulterated goods, any article of food to be considered adulterated or impoverished if it has been mixed with any other substance (other than preservative or colouring matter, of such a nature and such a quantity as not to render the article injurious to health), or if any part of it has been abstracted to the detriment of _ the article. Margarine or cheese containing margarine has to be conspicuously marked 'as such; condensed, separated or skim milk has to be clearly labelled " See also:machine-skimmed milk " or " skimmed milk," as the case may be. The next sections give to the Local Government Board and the Board of Agriculture a roving commission to see that the acts are properly enforced throughout the kingdom so as to apply the acts more equally throughout the country than heretofore, and in default of local authorities carrying out their duties empower the government departments mentioned to execute and enforce the acts at the expense of the 'local authorities. The importance of a See also:regular and conscientious See also:control of the public food supply by the local authorities was thus for the first time, after forty years of experimental legislation, fully acknowledged. In recognition of the great difficulties experienced for many years by analysts in their endeavour to fix minimum percentages for the See also:fat and other milk constituents, and their inability to do so without statutory powers, the Board of Agriculture is authorized by section 4 to make regulations " for determining what deficiency in any of the normal constituents of genuine milk, cream, butter or cheese, or what addition of extraneous matter or proportion of water " in any of these materials shall raise a presumption, until the contrary is proved, that these articles are not genuine. In pursuance of these powers the Board of Agriculture did in 1901 issue their milk regulations, adopting officially the minima agreed upon by public analysts, and in 1902 the sale of butter regulations, which fixed 16 % as the maximum of water that might be contained in butter. It is important to See also:note that the fact of a sample of milk falling See also:short of the See also:standard is not conclusive evidence of adulteration, but it justifies the institution of proceedings and casts the onus of proving that the sample is genuine upon the defendant. The Margarine Act of 1887 was extended to margarine cheese, the obligatory labelling of margarine packages was more precisely regulated, margarine manufacturers and dealers in that article were compelled to keep a See also:register open to inspection by the Board of Agriculture, showing the quantity and designation of each See also:consignment, and power was given to officers of the board to enter at all reasonable times manufactories of margarine and margarine cheese.

The amount of butter-fat that might be present in margarine was limited to 10 %, while under the Margarine Act of 1887 an unlimited admixture might have been made, provided that the mixture, no matter how large the percentage of butter, was sold as margarine. As is further explained'below, the difficulty of distinguishing without chemical aid between pure butter and margarine containing a considerable percentage of butter is very great, and fraudulent sales continued to be common after the passing of the Margarine Act. The labelling section of the Food Act 1875 (§ 8), which had been systematic-ally circumvented, was modified, a label being no longer recognized as distinctly and legibly written or printed, unless it is so written or printed that the notice of mixture given by the label is not obscured by other matter on the label, though labels that had been continuously in use for at least seven years before the commencement of the act were not interfered with. In consequence of the admitted unfairness of.asking for a portion of the contents of a properly labelled See also:

tin or package and then instituting proceedings because no declaration of admixture had been made, it was enacted that no person shall be required to sell any article exposed for 'sale in an unopened tin or packet, except in the unopened tin or 'packet in which it is contained. This re-moved a grievance which had See also:long been See also:felt both by•retailers and manufacturers, and is a provision of growing importance with the continually increasing sale of articles put up in factories. The warranty provisions, which, as before stated, had given rise to much litigation, were more clearly defined. A notice that a defendant would rely for his defence upon a warranty had to be given within seven days of the service of the summons or the defence would not be available, and the warrantor was em-powered to appear at the hearing and to give evidence so that no man's name could, as sometimes previously happened, be dragged into a case without due notice to him. A warranty or invoice given by a person See also:resident outside the See also:United Kingdom was no longer recognized as a defence, unless the defendant could prove that he had taken reasonable steps to ascertain and did in fact believe in the accuracy of the statement contained in the warranty. This prevented See also:collusion between a See also:foreign shipper and an importer; and, lastly, the definition of " food " was widened (in view of the baking-powder decision) so that the term food " shall include every article used for food or drink by man, other than drugs or water, and any article which ordinarily enters into or is used in the -composition or preparation of human food, and shall also include flavoring matters and condiments." The act of 1'899 embodies, with one exception, the most important recommendations of the Food Products Committee, the exception being the omission of instituting a board of reference that might deal with difficulties as they arose, See also:guide analysts and public authorities in fixing limits for articles other than milk and butter, and take up the important questions of preservatives and colouring matters and such like. An occurrence which almost immediately followed the passing of the act showed in the strongest manner the See also:necessity of such guiding board—namely, the outbreak of arsenical poisoning in the Midlands in the latter part of 19oo. In the See also:month of See also:June woo there occurred, mainly in the Midlands but also in other parts of England and See also:Wales, an out-See also:Arsenic break of an illness variously described as "alcoholism," m foods. " peripheral See also:neuritis " or "multiple neuritis." This affected about 6000 persons and resulted in about 7o deaths.

It was soon ascertained that the sufferers were all beer drinkers, and several of them were employees of a local brewery, the See also:

majority of whom had suffered for some months past. Although suspicion See also:fell See also:early upon beer, some considerable time elapsed before Dr E. S. See also:Reynolds of See also:Manchester discovered arsenic in dangerous proportions in the beer. Steps were immediately taken by brewers and sanitary authorities to ensure that this arsenical beer was withdrawn from sale, and, as a result, the epidemic came speedily to an end. In all instances where this epidemic of sickness had been traced to particular breweries, the latter had been users of brewing sugars—glucose and invert sugar—supplied by a single See also:firm. The quantity of arsenic detected in specimens of these brewing sugars was in some cases very large, amounting to upward of four grains per pound. The implicated brewing sugars were found to have become contaminated by arsenic in course of their manufacture through the use of sulphuric See also:acid, some specimens of which contained as much as 2.6% of arsenic. The acid had been made from highly arsenical See also:iron See also:pyrites, and as the manufacturers of the See also:glucose had not specifically contracted with the acid makers for pure acid, the latter, not knowing for what purpose the acid was to be used, had felt themselves justified in supplying impure acid. A royal commission was appointed in See also:February 19or, with Lord See also:Kelvin as chairman, to inquire into the matter, and an enormous amount of attention was naturally given to it by chemists and medical men. It was soon found that arsenic was very widely disseminated in two classes of food materials, namely, such as had been dried or roasted in gases resulting from the See also:combustion of See also:coal, and such as had been more or less chemically manufactured. All coal contains iron pyrites, and this See also:mineral again is contaminated with arsenic.

When the coal is burned the fumes are arsenical and part of the arsenic condenses and deposits. Malt dried in English malt kilns was found to be almost invariably arsenical, and there cannot be a doubt that English beers had for many years past been thus contaminated. At the present time coal virtually free from arsenic is selected for malting, or See also:

Newlands' process, consisting of the admixture with coal of lime which renders the arsenic non-volatile, is adopted, and malt free from all but the merest traces of arsenic is manufactured. Part of the arsenic remains in the coal-ashes and wherever these See also:deposit arsenic can be traced. See also:Sir Edward See also:Frankland had, many years previously, detected arsenic in the London See also:atmosphere. Chicory roasted with coal, steaks and chops grilled over an open See also:fire, thus obtain a See also:minute arsenical dosing. In sugar refineries carbonic acid See also:gas is, at one See also:stage of the process, passed through the liquor for the purpose of precipitating lime or strontia. When this carbonic acid is derived from. coal the sugar often shows traces of arsenic. When arsenical malt or sugar infusion is fermented, as in brewing, the yeast precipitates upon itself a considerable proportion of the impurity, thus partly cleaning the beer, but all preparations made from yeast—yeast-extracts resemble to some extent See also:meat extracts, with which they are some-times fraudulently mixed—are thus exposed to arsenical contamination. On the See also:continent of See also:Europe malt is not dried in kilns with See also:direct See also:access of combustion gases but on floors heated from beneath, and continental beers therefore have not been found arsenical. The second class of causes of contamination consists of chemicals. The most important chemical product is sulphuric acid.

This used to be made from See also:

brimstone or native volcanic sulphur, which is virtually free from arsenic. But since about r86o sulphuric acid has been more largely made from iron or copper pyrites. Pyrites-acid is always arsenical, but can, by suitable treatment, be easily freed from that impurity. For many purposes acid that has not been purified is employed. In the Leblanc process of manufacture the first step is the See also:conversion of See also:salt into sodium sulphate by sulphuric acid. The hydrochloric acid which is formed carries with it most of the arsenic of the sulphuric acid. Wherever such hydrochloric acid is used it introduces arsenic; thus, in the separation of See also:glycerin from See also:soap lyes, the See also:alkali of the latter is neutralized with hydrochloric acid and glycerin is in consequence frequently highly arsenical. So is the soda produced in the Leblanc process, and every one of the numerous soda salts made from soda is liable to receive its See also:share. All acids liberated from their salts by sulphuric acid, such as phosphoric, tartaric, citric, boracic, may be, and some-times are, thus contaminated. All superphosphates, made by the See also:action of crude sulphuric acid upon bones or other phosphatic materials, and sulphate of See also:ammonia, made from gas-liquor and acid, that is to say, two of the most important manurial materials, are arsenical, and the See also:poison is thus spread far and wide over meadows and See also:fields, and can be traced in the See also:soil wherever artificial See also:manures have been applied. The crops sometimes take up arsenic to a slight extent, but happily the plant is more selective than man, and no serious amount of poison absorption appears to be possible. The See also:risk of contamination is, of course, much greater with substances which, like glucose, are not further purified by See also:crystallization, but retain whatever impurity is introduced into them.

Glucose is not only used in beer, in which by legal enactments it is permitted to be used, but is also substituted for sugar in a number of food products, and is liable to carry into them its contamination. Sugar confectionery, jams and See also:

marmalade, honey, and such like, are often admixed with glucose. It is difficult to say in the present state of the law whether such admixture amounts to adulteration. It was clearly made originally for fraudulent purposes, but usage and high court decisions have gradually given the practice an See also:air of respectability. See also:Vinegar of sorts is also made from a glucose liquor produced by the action of sulphuric acid upon See also:maize or other starchy material, and is, in its turn, exposed to arsenic contamination. There is hardly a chemical substance which has directly or indirectly come into contact with sulphuric acid that, is not at times arsenical. Thus: while artificial colours, now so much used for the See also:dyeing of food products, are no longer prepared—as was rosaniline (the See also:parent substance of so many aniline dyes) at an early stage of its manufacture—with arsenic acid, yet they are often contaminated indirectly from sulphuric acid. Furthermore, hardly any metal that results from the smelting of any ore with coal is free from arsenic, iron in particular, as employed for pots and pans and implements, being highly arsenical. From the iron the many chemical preparations which contain or are made with the aid of iron salts may be arsenicated. The general presence of arsenic from some of these causes has been known for many years; outbreaks of arsenical poisoning have been due to it at various times, but neglect, forgetfulness and human shortsightedness let the matter go into oblivion, and it is safe to predict, in spite of all attention which has been given to the subject, of the panic which was created by the beer-poisoning outbreak, of the See also:shock and injury caused to manufacturers .of many kinds, and of the watchfulness aroused in officers of health and analysts, that as long as the production of food materials or substances that go into food materials is not left to the care of nature, and as long as man adds the products of his ingenuity to our food and drink, so long will " accidents," like the Manchester poisoning, from time to time recur. We now See also:search for arsenic; some other time it is lead, or See also:antimony, or See also:selenium, that will do the See also:mischief. Man does what he. can according to his light, but he See also:sees but a little patch of the See also:sky of knowledge, while the plant or the See also:animal See also:building up its body from the plant has learned by See also:inheritance to avoid the assimilation of matters noxious to it.

Strictly speaking, arsenical poisoning does not belong to the subject of adulteration. It is not due to wilfulness but to stupidity, but it affords a See also:

lesson which cannot be taken too much to See also:heart, that mankind, by relying too much upon " science " in feeding, is on a path that is fraught with considerable danger. To safeguard consumers, as far as practicable, the royal commission made important recommendations concerning amendments of the Food Acts; these, as at present interpreted and administered, were reported to be unsatisfactory for the purpose of protecting the consumer against arsenic and other deleterious substances in food. " As a rule public. analysts receive samples in order that they may pronounce upon their genuineness or otherwise, knowing nothing of the local circumstances which led to their being taken, of their origin or the reasons for sending them. The term `genuine' in this sense means that the analyst has not detected such objectionable substances as he has considered it necessary to look for in the sample submitted to him. Obviously, the value of the statement that the sample is ` genuine ' depends upon the extent to which the analyst has means of knowing what are the objection-able substances which it is liable to contain. In present circumstances he has not sufficient See also:information on this point." It was also pointed out that the application of the Food Acts to prevention of contamination of foods by deleterious substances was materially hindered by want of an See also:official authority with the duty of dealing with the various medical, chemical and technical questions involved, and that the absence of official standards militated against the efficiency of the existing acts. The commission advised that a special officer be appointed by the Local Government Board to obtain by inquiries from various See also:sources, such information as would enable the board to direct the work of local authorities in securing greater purity of food; and they further recommended that the board or court of reference, which had been advised by the Committee on Food Pro-ducts Adulteration, should be established. Pending the establishment of of&cii l standards in respect of arsenic under the Food Acts, they were of See also:opinion that penalties should be imposed upon any vendor of beer or any other liquid food, or of any liquor entering into the composition of food, if that liquid be shown by adequate test to contain one-hundredth of a See also:grain or more of arsenic in the See also:gallon, and with regard to solid food, no matter whether it be consumed habitually in large or small quantities, or whether it be taken by itself (like See also:golden See also:syrup), or mixed with water or other substances (like chicory or yeastextract)—if the substance contain one-hundredth of a grain of arsenic or more to the pound. The board of reference, most urgently needed for the protection of the public and for the guidance of manufacturers and officers, has yet to be created. While from time immemorial certain articles of food have been preserved by salting, smoking, drying, or by the addition of sugar and in some cases of See also:saltpetre, during the last quarter of the igth century the use of chemicals acting3e^g` more powerfully as See also:antiseptics or preservatives ex- food. tended enormously, particularly in England. A very large fraction of the British food supply being obtained from abroad, a proportionately great difficulty exists in obtaining the food in an entirely fresh and untainted condition.

Phoenix-squares

While refrigeration and See also:

cold-storage has been the See also:chief See also:factor in enabling the meat and other highly perishable foods to be imported, other steps, ensuring preservation of goods that are collected from farmers and brought together at See also:shipping ports, are necessary to prevent decomposition prior to such goods coming into cold See also:store. Thus it is well-nigh impossible to collect butter from farms in See also:Australia or New See also:Zealand far distant from the See also:coast without the addition of some chemical preservative. Heavily salted goods no longer See also:appeal to the modern See also:palate, and, with the progress of specialized labour, the inhabitants, especially of great towns, have become accustomed to resort to manufactured provisions instead of the See also:home-made and home-cooked food. Manufacturers of many articles of preserved food gradually adopted the use of chemical preservatives, and at the present time the practice has become so general that it may be said that practically every person in the United Kingdom who has passed the suckling stage consumes daily more or less food containing chemical preservatives. The Food Act allows of the addition of any ingredient, not injurious to health, if it be required for the production or preparation of the food, or as an article of commerce, in a state fit for carriage. The legality or otherwise of the use of chemical preservatives, therefore, hinges upon their innocuousness. Upon theoretical considerations it is clear that a substance which is capable of acting as an antiseptic must act injuriously upon bacteria, See also:fungi or yeasts, and as the human body is, generally 'speaking, less resistant to poisons than the low organisms in question, it would seem to follow that antiseptics are bound to affect it injuriously. It is, of course, a question of dose and proportion. It has further been said that all antiseptics possess some sort of medicinal action, and however valuable they may be in disease when administered under the control of a competent physician, they have no business to be given in-discriminately to sick and healthy alike by purveyors of food. The result of a general desire on the part of importers and manufacturers of food materials, of the officers under the Food Act, of the medical profession and of the public, resulted after many years of agitation and complaint and after numerous conflicting magisterial decisions, in the appointment in 18go, by the See also:president of the Local Government Board, of a departmental committee to inquire into the use of preservatives and colouring matters in food, with the reference to report: first, whether the use of such materials or any of them, in certain quantities, is injurious to health, and, if so, in what proportion does their use become injurious, and, second, to what extent and in what amounts are they used at the present time. After the examination of a great number of witnesses a report was issued in 1901. Perhaps the most important conclusion was that the instances of actual harm which were alleged to have occurred from the consumption of articles of food and drink chemically preserved were few in number, and were not at all supported by conclusive evidence.

During the period which has elapsed since chemically preserved food has been used, the mortality as a whole has declined, and while this naturally cannot be put to the See also:

credit of the preservatives but is largely due to better feeding in consequence of the introduction of cheaper foods, which are rendered possible to some extent by the use.of preservatives, it conclusively establishes the fact that no obvious harm has been done to the health of the community. The committee made certain recoin mendations which are the most authoritative pronouncements upon the subject. They are as follows:—That the use of form-aldehyde or See also:formalin, or preparations thereof, in food or drinks, be absolutely prohibited, and that salicylic acid be not used in a greater proportion than one grain per See also:pint in liquid food and one grain per pound in solid food, its presence in all cases to be declared. That the use of any preservatives or colouring matter whatever in milk offered for sale in the United Kingdom be constituted an offence under the Sale of Food and Drugs Act. That the only preservative which it shall be lawful to use in cream be boric acid, or mixtures of boric acid and See also:borax, and in amount not exceeding 0'25 % expressed as boric acid, the amount of such preservative to be notified by a label upon the See also:vessel. That the only preservative permitted to be used in butter and margarine be boric acid, or mixtures of boric acid and borax, to be used in proportions not exceeding 0.5 % expressed as boric acid. That in the case of all dietetic preparations intended for the use of invalids or infants, chemical preservatives of all kinds be prohibited. As the most commonly used chemical preservative is boric acid, free or in the form of borax, which is extensively employed Borax. in butter, cream, See also:ham, sausages, potted meats, cured See also:fish, and sometimes in jams and preserved See also:fruit, the arguments for and against its employment deserve more detailed attention. It cannot be looked upon in the light of common adulteration because, in any case, the quantity used is but an inconsiderable fraction, and the cost of it is generally greater than that of the food itself. It is not used to hide any traces of decomposition that may have taken place or to efface its effects. On the other See also:hand, it cannot be said to be " required for the production or preparation " of the articles with which it is mixed, since a fraction at least of similar articles are made without preservative. It enables food to be kept from decomposition, but it also lessens the need for cleanliness and encourages neglect and slovenliness in factories.

It has no See also:

taste, or only a very slight one, hence does not See also:manifest itself to the consumer in the same way as does common salt, and cannot therefore be avoided by him should he desire to do so. Its preservative action, that is, its potency, is very slight in comparison with most other preservatives; its potential injuriousness to man must be proportionately small. It is practically without interference upon salivary, peptic or tryptic digestion, unless given in large quantities. Experiments made by F. W. Tunnicliffe and R. See also:Rosenheim upon See also:children showed that neither boric acid nor borax, administered in doses of from 15 to 23 grains per diem, exerted any influence upon proteid See also:metabolism or upon the assimilation of phosphatized materials. The fat assimilation was, if anything, improved, and the body weight increased, and the general health and well-being was in no way affected. On the other hand, evidence was adduced that in some cases See also:digestive disturbances, after continuous administration of from 15 to 40 grains, were observable, See also:nausea and vomiting in some, and skin irritation, in one case resulting in See also:complete baldness, in others. Although it is in most cases very difficult to trace any gastric disturbance to any particular article of food or one of its ingredients, so as to exclude all other possible causes of disturbance, a fairly good case has been made out by a number of medical practitioners against boracic acid, taken in an See also:ordinary See also:diet and not for experimental purposes. The most exhaustive investigation which has as yet been made was carried out by Dr H. W.

Wiley, chief chemist to the United States See also:

department of agriculture. A large number of See also:young men who had offered themselves as subjects for the investigations, were boarded as a special " hygienic table," but otherwise continued their usual vocations during the whole period of the experiment. They were placed upon their See also:honour to observe the rules and regulations prepared by the department and to use no other food or drink than that provided, water excepted, and any water consumed away from the hygienic table was to be measured and reported. They were to continue their regular habits and not to indulge in any excessive amount of labour or exercise. Weight, temperature and See also:pulse See also:rate were continuously recorded. The periods I. 8during which the subjects of the experiment were kept under observation varied from thirty to seventy days, periods of rest being given during which they were permitted to eat moderately at tables other than the experimental one. There was a good and ample diet. The observations were divided into three periods: the fore period, the preservative period and the after period, during the whole of which time the rations of each member were weighed or measured and the excreta collected. Before the " fore " period was commenced a note was made of the quantities of food voluntarily consumed by each of the candidates, and from these the proper amount necessary in each case to maintain a comparatively See also:constant body weight was calculated. When a suitable result was thus arrived at, the same quantity of food was given daily during the " preservative " and " after " periods. The preservative was given in the forms of borax and of boric acid, at first mixed with butter, but subsequently in gelatine capsules.

This was found to be necessary from the fact that when the preservative was mixed with the food and concealed in it some of the members of the table evinced dislike of the food with which it was supposed to be incorporated; those who thought that the preservative was in the butter were disposed to find the butter unpalatable, and the same was true with those who thought it might be in the milk or coffee, while, when the preservative was given openly, much less disturbance was created. The preservative was given at first in small doses such as might be consumed in commercial food that had been preserved with borax; gradually the quantities were increased in order to reach the limit of See also:

toleration for each individual. All food was weighed, measured and analysed, the same being the case with the excreta. The See also:blood was examined periodically as regards colouring matter and number of corpuscles. Every-thing was done to keep up the general health of the members and to do away with all unfavourable See also:mental influences due to the circumstances. During the time of the experiment analyses were made of 2550 food samples and 1175 samples each of urine and faeces. The general results were as follows: there was no tendency to excite See also:diarrhoea, and the See also:nitrogen-metabolism was but very little influenced, if anything being slightly de-creased. As regards See also:phosphorus the combined results of all observations indicated that the preservative increased the See also:excretion of phosphorus to a small extent, from 97'3 % in the " fore " period, to 103.1 in the " preservative " period. The metabolism of fat was uninfluenced; there was an increase of the solid matters in the faeces and a decrease of those in the urine, from which Dr Wiley concluded that the preservatives interfered with the process of digestion and absorption. No influence was exerted on the corpuscles and the haemoglobin of the blood. The effect of boracic acid and borax on the general health varied with the amount administered, quantities not exceeding See also:half a gramme (7i grains) of boracic acid, or its equivalent of borax, producing no immediate effects, but the long-continued administration of such small doses seemed to produce the same results as the use of large doses over a shorter period. There was a tendency to diminish the appetite and to produce a feeling of fulness and uneasiness in the See also:stomach and sometimes actual nausea, also one of fulness in the See also:head manifested as a dull headache which disappeared when the preservative was dropped.

The continued administration of large doses, 6o to 75 grains per day, resulted in most cases in loss of appetite, inability to perform work of any kind and general unfitness. In most cases 45 grains per day could be taken for some time, but gradually injurious effects were observed. In some cases 30 and even 15 grains per day appeared to cause illness, but it is acknowledged that these persons may have been suffering from See also:

influenza. The administration of 7.5 grains was declared by Dr Wiley to be too much for the normal man to receive regularly, although for a limited period there might be no danger to health. Dr Wiley concludes his report: " It appears, therefore, that both boric acid and borax, when continuously administered in small doses for a long period or when given in large quantities for a short period, create disturbance of appetite, of digestion and of health." Dr Wiley's conclusions were adversely criticized by Dr O. Liebreich, who carefully studied on the spot all the conditions of the experiment and the documents relating to the investigation. He pointed out that the results were so indefinite and the number of persons under control so small that " one case of self-deception or of forgetfulness only would throw into See also:absolute uncertainty the See also:solution of the whole question "; that no lasting injury to health was found in spite of transient disturbances attributed by Dr Liebreich to other causes, and that all persons declared themselves to be in better See also:physical condition after seven months than they had been before. On the whole the See also:balance of evidence seems to be that while no acute' injury is likely to result from See also:boron compounds in food, they are liable to produce slighter digestive interferences. Other chemical substances that are in use for the purpose of preserving food materials may be treated more shortly. Form- aldehyde, coming into commerce in the form of a Form- aldehyde. 4o % solution under the name of formalin, was for a time largely used in milk. It certainly has very great antiseptic properties, as little as r part in 50,000 parts checking the growth of organisms in milk for some See also:hours, but as the substance combines with albuminous matters and hardens them to an extraordinary degree, rendering, for instance, gelatine perfectly insoluble in water, it exerts an inhibitory effect on the digestive ferments.

It injures salivary, peptic and pancreatic digestion. A set of five 'kittens fed with milk containing x part in 5o,000 of formaldehyde for seven See also:

weeks were strongly retarded in growth, three ultimately dying, while four control kittens fed on pure milk flourished. In even moderate doses formalin produces severe pains in the See also:abdomen and has caused death. It is now generally recognized as a substance that is admirably adapted for disinfecting a sick-See also:room, but quite improper and unsuitable for food preservation. Salicylic acid or orthohydroxybenzoic acid is either obtained from oil of See also:winter-See also:green or is made synthetically by See also:Kolbe's process from phenol and carbonic acid. Artificial salicylic acid generally contains impurities (creasotic acids) which act very injuriously upon health. When pure, salicylic acid employed as a food preservative has never produced decided injurious effects, although administered by itself in fairly strong solution it acts as an irritant to the stomach and kidneys, and sometimes causes skin eruptions. It is a powerful drug in larger doses and requires careful administration, especially as about 6o % of the persons to whom it is administered show symptoms known as " salicylism," namely, deafness, headache, See also:delirium, vomiting, sometimes See also:haemorrhage or heart-failure. It is doubtful whether pure salicylic acid produces these symptoms. When present in proportion of r to r000 it inhibits the growth of moulds and yeasts. In jams 2 grains per pound and in beverages 7 grains to a gallon are considered by manufacturers to be sufficient for preservative purposes. It is used mainly in articles of food or drink containing sugar, that is to say, in jams and preserved fruit, lime and See also:lemon juices, syrups, See also:cider, British wines and imported lager.

Its use in butter, potted meat, milk or cream, in which it was not in-frequently met with formerly, is now quite exceptional. It has already been stated that the preservative committee recommended its permissive use in small proportions. ' To some extent benzoic acid and benzoates have taken the place of salicylic acid and salicylates, partly because salicylic acid can readily be detected analytically, while benzoic acid is not quite easily discoverable. Its antiseptic potency is about equal to that of salicylic acid, and the arguments for or against its use are similar to those relating to the latter. For the preservation of meat and beer, lime juice and dried fruit, sulphur dioxide (sulphurous acid) and some of the sulphites have long been employed. Sulphuring of hops and disinfection of barrels by burning brimstone matches is an exceedingly old practice. Burning. sulphur is well known as a gaseous disinfectant of rooms, bacteria being killed in air containing r °Jo of the gas. As the taste and See also:

smell of sulphurous acid and of sulphites are very pronounced it follows that but smallquantities can be added to food or drink. About r part in 4000 or 5000 of beer is the usual amount. While, in larger quantities, the sulphites have decided physiological activity and are See also:apt to produce nephritis, there is not any evidence that they have ever caused injurious effects in alcoholic liquors. The excise authorities have tacitly sanctioned their employment in breweries, although the Customs and Inland Revenue Act 1885 declares that a brewer of beer shall not add any matter or thing thereto except finings or other matter or thing sanctioned by the commissioners of Inland Revenue, and althoi' th sulphites are used in all breweries, the Board of Inland Revenue do neither See also:sanction nor interfere. An antiseptic with a pronounced taste is obviously a safer one in the hands of a non-medical person than one virtually devoid of taste, like boric, salicylic or benzoic acids or their salts.

Sodium fluoride, a salt possessing powerfully antiseptic properties, but also at the same time clearly injurious to health and interfering with salivary and peptic digestion, has been found in butter, imported mainly from See also:

Brittany, p re er serva- in quantities quite inadmissible in food under any See also:rives. circumstances. A few other chemical preservatives are occasionally used. See also:Hydrogen peroxide has been found effective in milk sterilization, and if the substance is pure, no serious objection can be raised against it. Saccharine, and other artificial sweetening agents, having antiseptic properties, are taking the place of sugar in beverages like ginger-beer and lemonade, but the substitution of a trace of a substance that provides sweetness without at the same time giving the substance and food value of sugar is strongly to be deprecated. The employment of chemical preservative matters in articles intended for human consumption threatens to become a See also:grave danger to health or well-being. Each dealer in food contributes but a little: each one claims that his particular article of food cannot be brought into commerce without preservative, and each condemns the use of these substances by others. There is doubtless something to be said for the practice, but infinitely more against it. It cheapens food by allowing its collection in districts far away, but the chief gainer is not the public as a whole but the manufacturer and the wholesale See also:merchant. Our body has by inheritance acquired habits and needs that are quite foreign to chemical interference. Some day, artificially prepared foods, containing liberal quantities of matters that are not now food ingredients, may conceivably compare with natural food products, but that day is not yet, and meantime it ought to be clearly the duty of the state to see that the evil is checked. The intention which has introduced this form of adulteration may be more or less beneficent, but in practice it is almost wholly evil. A similar See also:criticism applies to the continually extending use of colouring matter in food.

Civilized man requires his food not only to be healthy and tasty, but also attractive in See also:

appearance. It is the See also:art of the See also:cook to prepare See also:ala dishes that coloaritterlang please the See also:eye. This is a difficult art, for the various food. colouring matters which are naturally present in meat and fish, in fruit, legumes and green vegetables are of a delicate and changeable nature and easily affected or destroyed by cooking. Many years ago some artful, if stupid, cook. found that green vegetables like peas or See also:spinach, when cooked in a copper See also:pan, by preference a dirty one, showed a far more brilliant colour than the same vegetables cooked in earthenware or iron. The manufacturer who puts up substances like peas in pots or tins for sale produces the same effect which the cook in her See also:ignorance innocently obtained, by the wilful addition of a substance known to be injurious to health, namely, sulphate of copper. The copper combines with the See also:chlorophyll, forming copper phyllocyanate, which, by See also:reason of its insolubility in the gastric juice, is comparatively innocuous. Preserved peas and beans have been for so many years " coppered " in this manner that it is difficult to induce the public to accept these vegetables when possessed of their natural colour only. Several countries endeavoured to abolish the objectionable practice, but the public pressure has been too great, and to-day the Salicylic acid. practice is almost universal. In England the amount of copper corresponds to from one to two grains per pound of the vegetable calculated as crystallized copper sulphate. ' The opinion of the departmental committee was clearly expressed that the practice should be prohibited. No effect has been given to the recommendation.

Milk is naturally almost white with a tint of cream colour. When adulterated with water this tint changes to a bluish one. To hide this tell-See also:

tale of a fraud, a yellow colouring matter used to be added by London milkmen. Very gradually this practice, which had its origin in fraud, has extended to all milk sold in London. The consumer, mis-educated into believing milk to be yellow, now requires it to be so. Large dairy companies have endeavoured to wean the public of its See also:error, without success. From milk the practice extended to butter; natural butter is sometimes yellowish, mostly a faint fawn, and sometimes almost white. •In agricultural districts this is well known and taken as a matter of course. In big towns, where the connexion of butter and the cow is not well known, the consumer requires butter to be of that colour which he imagines to be butter-colour. See also:Anatto, See also:turmeric, See also:carrot-juice used formerly to be employed for colouring milk, butter and cheese, but of See also:late certain aniline dyes, mostly quite as harmless physiologically as the vegetable dyes just mentioned, are largely being used. The same aniline dyes are also employed in the manufacture of an imitation See also:Demerara sugar from white See also:beet sugar crystals. Aniline dyes are very frequently used by jam-makers; the natural colour of the fruit is apt to suffer in the boiling-pan, and unripe, discoloured or unsound fruit can be made brilliant and enticing by dye.

The brilliant colours of cheap sugar confectionery are almost invariably produced by artificial See also:

tar-colours. Most members of this class of colouring matters are quite harmless, especially in the small quantities that are required for colouring, but there are a few exceptions, picric acid, dinitrocresol, See also:Martius-yellow, See also:Bismarck brown and one of the tropaeolins being distinctly poisonous. On the whole, the employment of powerful aniline dyes is an advance as compared with the use of the vicious and often highly poisonous mineral colours which Hassall met with so frequently in the middle of the 19th century. Mineral colours, with very few exceptions, are no longer used in food. See also:Oxide of iron or ochre is still very often found in potted meats, fish sauces and chocolates; dioxide of See also:manganese is admixed with cheap chocolates. All lump sugar of commerce is dyed. Naturally it has a yellow tint. See also:Ultramarine is added to it and counteracts the yellowness. In the same way our See also:linen is naturally yellow and only made to look white by the use of the See also:blue-bag. The same idea underlies both practices, and indeed the use of all colouring matters in manufactured articles, namely, to make them Iook better than they would otherwise. Within See also:bounds, this is a reasonable and laudable desire, but it also covers many sins—poor materials, See also:bad workmanship, faulty manufacturing and often fraud. Like sugar, flour and See also:rice are some-times blued to make them look white.

All vinegar, most beers, all stout, are artificially coloured with burnt sugar or caramel. The See also:

line dividing the legitimate and laudable from the fraudulent and punishable is so thin and difficult to draw that neither the law nor its officers have ventured to draw it, and yet it is a matter which urgently requires regulation at the hands of the state. Practices which, when new, admit of regulation are almost ineradicable when they have become old and possessed of " vested rights." Recognizing this, the departmental committee, -like the royal commission on arsenical poisons, recommended that " means be provided, either by the establishment of a separate court of reference, or by the See also:imposition of more direct See also:obligation on the Local Government Board, to exercise supervision over the use of preservatives and colouring matters in foods and to prepare schedules of such as may be considered inimical to the public health." In close connexion with this subject is the occasional occurrence of injurious metallic impurities in food-materials. Tin chloride is used in the See also:West Indies to produce the yellow colour of Demerara sugar. The old processes of sugar-boiling left some ofthe brown syrup attached to the crystals, giving them both their colour and their delicious aroma; with the introduction of modern processes affording a much greater yield Metem of highly refined sugar, white sugar only was the impurnles. result. The consumer, accustomed to yellow sugar, had the colour artificially supplied by the action of the tin See also:compound upon the' sugar. At the present time all Demerara sugar, with the exception of that portion that is dyed with aniline dye, has had its colour artificially given it and consequently contains strong traces of tin. Soda-water, lemonade and other artificial aerated liquors are liable to tin or lead contamination, the former proceeding from the tin pipes and vessels, the latter from citric and tartaric acids and cream of See also:tartar used as ingredients, these being crystallized by their manufacturers in leaden pans. Almost all " canned " goods contain more or less tin as a contamination from the tin-See also:plate. While animal foods do not attack the tin to any great extent, their acidity being small, almost all vegetable materials, especially fruits and tomatoes, powerfully corrode the tin covering of the plate, dissolving it and becoming impregnated with tin compounds. It is quite easy to obtain tin-reactions in abundance from every grain of tinned peaches, apples or tomatoes. These tin compounds are by no means innocuous; yet poisoning from tinned vegetable foods is of rare occurrence.

On the whole, tin-plate is a very unsuitable material for the storage and preservation of acid goods. Certain enamels, used for See also:

glazing earthen-See also:ware or for coating metal cooking pots, contain lead, which they yield to the food prepared in them. Food materials that have been in contact with galvanized vessels sometimes are contaminated with See also:zinc. Zinc is also not infrequently present in wines. The effect of the application of the food laws has been entirely beneficial. Not only has the percentage proportion of samples found adulterated largely declined, but the See also:gross forms of adulteration which prevailed in the middle of the nglish Results of 19th century have almost vanished. Plenty of fraud Food Acts. still prevails, but poisoning by reckless admixture is of exceedingly rare occurrence. Whilst formerly milk was not infrequently adulterated with an equal bulk of water, few fraudulent milkmen now venture to exceed an addition of Io or 15%. A See also:bird's-eye view over the effect is obtained from the following figures for England and Wales: Number of Samples. Percentage Year. of Examined. Adulterated.

Adulteration. 1877 14,706 2,826 19.2 1879 17,049 2,535 14.8 1884 22,951 3,311 14.4 X889 26,956 3,096 77.5 1894 39,516 4,060 10.3 1899 53,056 4,970 9.4 1904 84,678 7,173 8-5 The details of the working of the Food Acts in 1904 in England and Wales are set out in the table on the next See also:

page. United States.—Each separate state has food laws of its own. From the 1st of See also:January 1907 the "See also:American See also:National Pure Food Law," applicable to the United States generally, came into force, without superseding the State food laws, the only effect of the National Law being the legalization of shipments of any food which complies with the provisions of the National Law into any state from another state, even though the food is adulterated within the meaning of the state law. The law applies to every person in the United States who receives food from another state and offers it for sale in the See also:original unbroken packages in which he receives it, and if it is adulterated or misbranded within the meaning of the National Law he can be punished for having received it and offering it for sale in the original unbroken package to the same extent as the person who shipped it to him can be punished.' The mere fact that he is a See also:citizen of a state selling food within that state will not excuse him; and he will be subject to prosecution to the same extent as he would be if he uttered counterfeit See also:money. Retailers. however, can protect themselves from prosecution when they sell goods in original unbroken packages by procuring a written See also:guarantee, signed by the person from whom they received the goods, such guarantee stating that the goods are not adulterated within the meaning of the National Law. The guarantee must also contain the name and address of the wholesale vendor, but unless the parties See also:signing the guarantee are residents of the United States the guarantee is void. The law affects all foods shipped from one state or district into another and also all foods intended for export to a foreign country. It also affects all food products manufactured or offered for sale in any Table showing working of British Food Acts, 1904. Samples Found Percentage Examined. Adulterated.

Adulterated. Milk . . 36,413 4,031 11.1 Butter 15,124 867 5'7 Cheese 2,176 20 0.9 Margarine 1,169 83 7'1 Lard . 2,489 4 0.2 Bread 473 1 0.2 Flour. 476 3 0.6 Tea 486 . Coffee 2,550 161 6.3 Cocoa 477 42 8.8 Sugar .' 901 49 5.4 See also:

Mustard . 812 39 4.8 Confectionery and Jam 1,303 72 5'5 Pepper 2,393 43 I.8 Wine 33 54 17.5 Beer I,o65 75 7.0 Spirits 6,938 832 12.0 Drugs :- 395 24 6.1 Camphorated Oil Sweet Spirit of See also:Nitre . 243 66 27.2 Sulphur . 131 7 5.3 Cream of Tartar . 441 88 20.0 Glycerin. 192 21 10.9 See also:Rhubarb prepara- 96 5 5.2 tions . Seidlitz Powders .

8, 3 3.7 See also:

Linseed 70 I P4 See also:Magnesia 48 9 18.8 See also:Mercury prepara- 28 4 14.3 tions . See also:Cod See also:Liver Oil 245 7 2.9 Iron Pills 16 Compound Liquorice III 2 1.8 Powder . See also:Tincture of See also:Iodine 23 4 17'4 Other Drugs . 1,124 124 11 0 See also:Total Drugs . 3,214 365 11.3 Other Articles:- 704 Ginger . . . Syrup and See also:Treacle 183 8 4'4 Baking Powder . 281 II 3'9 Vinegar. 773 57 7.4 See also:Arrowroot . 467 3 o•6 Oatmeal 359 See also:Sago 227 14 6.2 Olive Oil 306 9 2.9 Dripping and Fat 85 I I.2 Sundries. • 2,496 329 13.2 Total other Articles 5,881 432_ 7'3 All Articles • I ' 84,678 7,173 8.5 territory or the District of See also:Columbia, wherever such foods may have been produced. The law does not affect foods manufactured and sold wholly within one state, nor such as have been shipped from another state but not in the original package.

While thus the National Food Law is mainly intended to regulate the food See also:

traffic between the different states, and leaves to the states freedom to regulate their See also:internal traffic, it must gradually tend to unify the present complicated state food legislation, and it is therefore here more usefully considered than would be the separate state laws. The definition of adulteration as set forth in sec. 7 is as follows:-" For the purpose of this act an article shall be deemed to be adulterated: In the case of drugs: (r) If, when a drug is sold under or by a name recognized in the United States See also:Pharmacopoeia or National Formulary, it differs from the standard of strength, quality or purity, as determined by the test laid down in the United States Pharmacopoeia or National Formulary official at the time of investigation; provided that no drug defined in the United States Pharmacopoeia or National Formulary shall be deemed to be adulterated under this provision if the standard of strength, quality or purity be plainly stated upon the bottle, See also:box or other container thereof although the standard may differ from that determined by the test laid down in the United States Pharmacopoeia or National Formulary. (2) If its strength or purity fall below the professed standard or quality under which it is sold. In the case of confectionery: If it contains terra See also:alba, See also:barytes, See also:talc, chrome yellow or other mineral substance or poisonous colour or flavour, or other ingredient deleterious or detrimental to health, or any vinous, malt or spirituous liquor or compound or narcotic drug. In the case of food: (1) If any substance has been mixed and packed with it so as to reduce or lower or injuriously affect its quality or strength. (2) If any substance has been substituted wholly or in part for the article. (3) If any valuable constituent of the article has been wholly or in part abstracted. (4) If it be mixed, coloured, powdered, coated or stained in a manner whereby damage or inferiority is concealed. (5) If it contain any added poisonous or other added deleterious ingredient which may render such article injurious to health: provided that when in the preparation of food products for shipment they are preserved by any See also:external application applied in such manner that the preservation is necessarily removed mechanic-ally, or by maceration in water, or otherwise, and directions for removal of said preservations shall be printed on the covering of the package, the provisions of the act shall be construed as applying only when said products are ready for consumption. (6) If it consists in whole or in part of a filthy, decomposed or putrid animal or vegetable substance, or any portion of an animal unfit for food, whether manufactured or not, or if it is the pro-duct of a diseased animal or one that has died otherwise than by slaughter. ..." Whatever vagueness attaches to these definitions is intended to be removed by secs.

3 and 4, which provide that the secretaries of the See also:

Treasury, of Agriculture, and of Commerce and Labour " shall make See also:uniform rules and regulations for carrying out the provisions of the act, including the collection and examination of specimens of food and drugs," which examination " shall be made in the See also:bureau of chemistry of the department of agriculture, or under the direction and supervision of such bureau, for the purpose of determining from such examinations whether such articles are adulterated or misbranded within the meaning of the act." Contravention of the act is punishable for the first offence by a fine not exceeding 500 dollars or 1 year's imprisonment or both, and for each subsequent offence by a fine not less than See also:I000 dollars or I year's imprisonment or both. Under an act of See also:congress, approved See also:March 1903, the bureau of agriculture established standards of purity for food products, " to determine what are regarded as adulterations therein for the guidance of the officials of the various states and of the courts of See also:justice." The elaborate set of food definitions and standards worked out under the guidance of the chief of the bureau, Dr H. W. Wiley, have also received legal sanction and form a corollary to the National Food Law. For each of the more important articles of food an official definition of its nature and composition has thus been established, of the utmost value to food officers, manufacturers and merchants not only in the United States but throughout the See also:world. A few of these definitions may here find a place: " Lard is the rendered fresh fat from slaughtered healthy hogs. See also:Leaf-lard is the lard rendered at moderately high temperatures from the internal fat of the abdomen of the hog, excluding that adherent to the intestines. Standard lard and standard leaf-lard are lard and leaf-lard respectively, free from rancidity, con taining not more than 1% of substances other than fatty acids, not fat, necessarily incorporated therewith in the process of rendering, and standard leaf-lard has an iodine number not greater than 6o. Milk is the lacteal secretion obtained by the complete milking of one or more healthy cows, properly fed and kept, excluding that obtained within 15 days before and 5 days after calving. Standard milk is milk containing not less than 12 % of total solids and not less than 81 % of solids not fat, nor less than 34 % of milk-fat. Standard skim-milk is skim-milk containing not less than 9; % of milk-solids. Standard condensed milk and standard sweetened condensed milk are condensed milk and sweetened condensed milk respectively, containing no less than 28% of milk-solids, of which not less than one-fourth is milk-fat.

Standard milk-fat or butter-fat has a Reichert-Meissl number not less than 24 and a specific gravity at 4o° C. not less than 0.905. Standard butter is butter containing not less than 82.5 % of butter-fat. Standard whole-milk cheese is cheese containing in the water-free substance not less than 5o % of butter-fat. Standard sugar contains at least 99.5 % of sucrose. Standard See also:

chocolate is chocolate containing not more than 3 % of ash insoluble in water, 3.5 % of crude fibre, and q % of starch, nor less than 45 % of cocoa-fat." Numerous other standards with details too technical for See also:reproduction here have also been fixed. See also:German See also:Empire.—The law of the 14th of May 1879, largely based upon the English Food and Drugs Act 1875, regulates the trade in food. Each town or district appoints a public analyst, and there is a state laboratory in See also:Berlin directly under the control of the See also:ministry of the interior with advisory functions. The ministry, under the See also:advice of this department, issues from time to time regulations concerning the sale of or details specifying the mode of analysis of various products of food or drink. Both in the United States and in See also:Germany, therefore, the executive officers (public analysts) have some authoritative official department for guidance and information.

End of Article: ADULTERATION (from Lat. adulterare, to defile or falsify)

Additional information and Comments

There are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click, and select "copy." Then paste it into your website, email, or other HTML.
Site content, images, and layout Copyright © 2006 - Net Industries, worldwide.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.

Links to articles and home page are always encouraged.

[back]
ADULTERATION
[next]
ADULTERATION OF DAIRY PRODUCE