Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
MANICHAEISM . Towards the See also:close of the 3rd See also:century two See also:great religions stood opposed to one another in western See also:Europe, one wholly Iranian, namely Mithraism, the other of Jewish origin, but not without Iranian elements, See also:part and See also:parcel probably of the Judaism which gave it See also:birth, namely See also:Christianity. See also:Professor See also:Franz Cumont has traced the progress of Mithraism all over the See also:Balkan See also:Peninsula, See also:Italy, the See also:Rhine-lands, See also:Britain, See also:Spain and Latin See also:Africa. It' was peculiarly the See also:religion of the See also:Roman garrisons, and was carried by the legionaries wherever they went. It was an austere religion, inculcating self-See also:restraint, courage and honesty; it secured See also:peace of See also:conscience through forgiveness of sins, and See also:abated for those who were initiated in its mysteries the superstitious terrors of See also:death and the See also:world to come. In these respects it resembled Christianity. Soldiers may have espoused it rather than the See also:rival faith, because in the See also:primitive See also:age See also:Christian discipline denied them the sacraments, on the ground that they were professional shedders of See also:blood. The cumbrous See also:mythology and See also:cosmogony of Mithraism at last weakened its hold upon men's minds, and it disappeared during the 4th century before a victorious Catholicism, yet not until another faith, equally Iranian in its mythology and cosmological beliefs, had taken its See also:place. This new faith was that of Mani, which spread with a rapidity only to be explained by supposing that Mithraism had prepared men's minds for its reception. Mani professed to blend the teachings of See also:Christ with the old See also:Persian Magism. Kessler, the latest historian of Manichaeism, opines that Mani's own See also:declaration on this point is not to be relied upon, and has tried to prove that it was rather of Semitic or Chaldaic origin. He certainly shows that the old See also:Assyrian mythology influenced Mani, but not that this See also:element did not reach him through Persian channels. In genuine Manichaean documents we only find the name Mani, but See also:Manes, Mavns, Manichaeus, meet us in 4th-century See also:Greek and Latin documents. In the Acta Archelai his first name is said to have been Cubricus, which Kessler explains as a corruption of Shuravik, a name See also:common among the See also:Arabs of the Syrian See also:desert. See also:Life of Mani.—According to the See also:Mahommedan tradition, which is more trustworthy than the See also:account contained in these Acta, Mani was a high-See also:born Persian of See also:Ecbatana. The See also:year of his birth is uncertain, but Kessler accepts as reliable the statement made by See also:Biruni, that Mani was born in the year 527 of the astronomers of See also:Babylon (A.D. 215-216). He received a careful See also:education at See also:Ctesiphon from his See also:father Fatak, Babak or Patak (Ilarbaos). As the father connected himself at a later See also:period with the See also:confession of the Moghtasilah, or " See also:Baptists," in See also:southern Babylonia, the son also was brought up in the religious doctrines and exercises of this See also:sect. These Baptists (see the Fihrist) were apparently connected with the Elkesaites and the See also:Hemerobaptists, and certainly with the See also:Mandaeans. It is probable that this Babylonian sect had absorbed Christian elements. Thus the boy See also:early became acquainted with very different forms of religion. If even a small part of the stories about his father is founded on fact, it was he who first introduced Mani to that medley of religions out of which his See also:system arose. Manichaean tradition relates that Mani received revelations while yet a boy, and assumed a See also:critical attitude towards the religious instruction that was being imparted to him. This is the more incredible since the same tradition informs us that the boy was as yet prohibited from making public use of his new religious views. It was only when Mani had reached the age of twenty-five or See also:thirty years that he began to proclaim his new religion. This he did at the See also:court of the Persian See also: The successor of Shapur, See also:Hormizd (272-273), appears to have been favourably disposed towards him, but Bahram I. abandoned him to the fanaticism of the Magians, and caused him to be crucified in the capital in the year 276/7. The See also:corpse was flayed, and Mani's adherents %See also:Isere cruelly persecuted by the king. Mani's Writings.—Mani himself composed a large number of See also:works and epistles, which were in great part still known to the Mahommedan historians, but are now mostly lost. The later heads of the Manichaean churches also wrote religious See also:treatises, so that the See also:ancient Manichaean literature must have been very extensive. According to the Fihrist, Mani made use of the Persian and See also:Syriac See also:languages; but, like the Oriental Marcionites before him, he invented an See also:alphabet of his own, which the Fihrist has handed down to us. In this alphabet the sacred books of the Manichaeans were written, even at a later period. The Fihrist reckons seven See also:principal works of Mani, six being in the Syriac and one in the Persian See also:language; regarding some of these we also have See also:information in See also:Epiphanius, See also:Augustine, See also:Titus of Bostra, and See also:Photius, as well as in the See also:formula of See also:abjuration (Cotelerius, PP. A See also:post. Opp. i. 543) and in the Acta Archelai. They are (1) The See also:Book of Secrets (see Acta Archel.), containing discussions bearing on the Christian sects spread throughout the See also:East, especially the Marcionites and Bardesanites, and dealing also with their conception of the Old and New Testaments; (2) -The Book of the Giants (Demons?); (3) The Book of Precepts for Hearers (probably identical with the Epistola Fundamenti of Augustine and with the Book of Chapters of Epiphanius and the Acta Archelai; this was the most widely spread and most popular Manichaean See also:work, having been translated into Greek and Latin; it contained a See also:short See also:summary of all the doctrines of fundamental authority); (4) The Book Shahpurakan (Flagel was unable to explain this name; according to Kessler it signifies' See also:epistle to King Shapur "; the See also:treatise was of an eschatological See also:character); (5) The Book of Quickening (Kessler identifies this work with the See also:Thesaurus [vitae] of the Acta Archelai, Epiphanius, Photius and Augustine, and if this be correct it also must have been in use among the Latin Manichaeans); (6) he Book rpay,uareta (of unknown contents) ; (7) a book in the Persian language, the See also:title of which is not given in our See also:present See also:text of the Fihrist, but which is in all See also:probability identical with the " See also:holy See also:gospel " of the Manichaeans (mentioned in the Acta Archel. and many other authorities). It was this work which the Manichaeans set up in opposition to the Gospels. Besides these principal works, Mani also wrote a largenumber of smaller treatises and epistles. The practice of See also:writing epistles was continued by his successors. These Manichaean See also:dissertations also became known in the Graeco-Roman See also:Empire, and existed in collections.' There also existed a Manichaean book of memorabilia, and of prayers, in Greek, as well as many others,' all of which were destroyed by the Christian bishops acting in See also:con-junction with the authorities. A Manichaean epistle, addressed to one See also:Marcellus, has, however, been preserved for us in the Acta Archelai.' Manichaean System.—Though the leading features of Manichaean See also:doctrine can be exhibited clearly even at the present day, and though it is undoubted that Mani himself See also:drew up a See also:complete system, many details are nevertheless uncertain, since they are differently described in different sources, and it often remains doubtful which of the accounts that have been transmitted to us represents the See also:original teaching of the founder. The Manichaean system is one of consistent, uncompromising See also:dualism, in the See also:form of a fantastic See also:philosophy of nature. The See also:physical and the ethical are not distinguished, and in this respect the character of the system is thoroughly materialistic; for when Mani co-ordinates See also:good with See also:light, and evil with darkness, this is no See also:mere figure of speech, but light is actually good and darkness evil. From this it follows that religious knowledge involves the knowledge of nature and her elements, and that redemption consists in a physical See also:process of freeing the element of light from the darkness. Under such circumstances See also:ethics becomes a doctrine of See also:abstinence in regard to all elements which have their source within the See also:sphere of darkness. The self-contradictory character of the present world forms the point of departure for Mani's speculations. This contra-diction presents itself to his mind primarily as elemental, and only in the second instance as ethical, inasmuch as he considers the sensual nature of See also:man to be the outflow of the evil elements in nature. From the contradictory character of the world he concludes the existence of two beings, originally quite See also:separate from each other—light and darkness. Each is to be thought of according to the See also:analogy of a See also:kingdom. Light presents itself to us as the good primal spirit (See also:God, radiant with the ten [twelve) virtues of love, faith, fidelity, high-mindedness, See also:wisdom, meekness, knowledge, understanding, See also:mystery and insight), and then further as the heavens of light and the See also:earth of light, with their guardians the glorious aeons. Darkness is likewise a spiritual kingdom (more correctly, it also is conceived of as a spiritual and feminine personification), but it has no " God " at its See also:head. It embraces an " earth of darkness." As the earth of light has five tokens (the mild zephyr, cooling See also:wind, See also:bright light, quickening See also:fire, and clear See also:water), so has the earth of darkness also five (mist, See also:heat, the See also:sirocco, darkness and vapour). Satan with his demons was born from the kingdom of darkness. These two kingdoms stood opposed to each other from all eternity, touching each other on one See also:side, but remaining unmingled. Then Satan began to rage, and made an incursion into the kingdom of light, into the earth of light. The God of light, with his See also:syzygy, " the spirit of his right See also:hand," now begot the primal man, and sent him, equipped with the five pure elements, to fight against Satan. But the latter proved himself the stronger, and the primal man was for a moment vanquished. And although the God of light himself now took to the See also: 3 Zittwitz assumes that this epistle was in its original form of much larger extent, and that the author of the Acts took out of it the See also:matter for the speeches which he makes Mani deliver during his disputation with See also:Bishop See also:Archelaus. The same See also:scholar traces back the account by Turbo in the Acts, and the See also:historical data given in the See also:fourth See also:section, to the writings of Turbo, a Mesopotamian, who is assumed to have been a Manichaean renegade and a Christian. But as to this difference of See also:opinion is at least allowable. primal man See also:free; the latter had already been robbed of part of his light by the darkness, and the five dark elements had already mingled themselves with the generations of light. It only remained now for the primal man to descend into the See also:abyss and prevent the further increase of the generations of darkness by cutting off their roots; but he could not immediately separate again the elements that had once mingled. These mixed elements are the elements of the present visible world, which was formed from them at the command of the God of light. The forming of the world is in itself the beginning of the deliverance of the imprisoned elements of light. The world is represented as an orderly structure of various heavens and various earths, which is See also:borne and supported by the aeons, the angels of light. It possesses in the See also:sun and See also:moon, which are in their nature almost quite pure, large reservoirs, in which the portions of light that have been rescued are stored up. In the sun dwells the primal man himself, as well as the glorious See also:spirits which carry on the work of redemption; in the moon the See also:mother of life is enthroned. The twelve constellations of the See also:zodiac form an ingenious See also:machine, a great See also:wheel with buckets, which pour into the sun and moon, those shining See also:ships that See also:sail continually through space, the portions of light set free from the world. Here they are purified anew, and attain finally to the kingdom of pure light and to God Himself. The later Western Manichaeans termed those portions of light which are scattered throughout the world—in its elements and organisms—awaiting their deliverance, the Jesus patibilis. It is significant of the materialistic and pessimistic character of the system that, while the formation of the world is considered as a work of the good spirits, the creation of man is referred to the princes of darkness. The first man, See also:Adam, was engendered by Satan in See also:conjunction with " See also:sin," " cupidity," " See also:desire." But the spirit of darkness drove into him all the portions of light he had stolen, in See also:order to be able to dominate them the more securely. Hence Adam is a discordant being, created in the See also:image of Satan, but carrying within him the stronger spark of light. See also:Eve is given him by Satan as his See also:companion. She is seductive sensuousness, though also having in her a small spark of light. But if the first human beings thus stood entirely under the dominion of the See also:devil, the glorious spirits took them under their care from the very outset, sending aeons down to them (including Jesus), who instructed them regarding their nature, and in particular warned Adam against sensuality. But this first man See also:fell under the temptation of sexual desire. See also:Cain and See also:Abel indeed are not sons of Adam, but of Satan and Eve; See also:Seth, however, who is full of light, is the offspring of Adam by Eve. Thus did mankind come into existence, its various members possessing very different shares of light, but the men having uniformly a larger measure of it than the See also:women. In the course of See also:history the demons sought to bind men to themselves by means of sensuality, See also:error and false religions (among which is to be reckoned above all the religion of See also:Moses and the prophets), while the spirits of light carried on their process of See also:distillation with the view of gaining the pure light which exists in the world. But these good spirits can only See also:save men by imparting to them the true gnosis concerning nature and her forces, and by calling them away from the service of darkness and sensuality. To this end prophets, preachers of true knowledge, have been sent into the world. Mani, following the example of the gnostic Jewish Christians, appears to have held Adam, See also:Noah, See also:Abraham (perhaps Zoroaster and See also:Buddha) to be such prophets. Probably Jesus was also accounted a prophet who had descended from the world of light—not, however, the historical Jesus, the devilish See also:Messiah of the See also:Jews, but a contemporaneous phantom Jesus, who neither suffered nor died (Jesus impatibilis). According to the teaching of some Manichaeans, it was the primal man who disseminated the true gnosis in the character of Christ. But at all events Mani himself, on his own claim, is to be reckoned the last and greatest prophet, who took up the work of Jesus impatibilis and of See also:Paul (for he too finds recognition), and firstbrought full knowledge. He is the " See also:leader," the See also:ambassador of the light," the " Paraclete." It is only through his agency and that of his imitators, " the elect," that the separation of the light from the darkness can be completed. The system contains very fantastic descriptions of the processes by which the portions of light when once set free finally ascend even to the God of light. He who during his lifetime did not become one of the elect, who did not completely redeem himself, has to go through a severe process of See also:purification on the other side of the See also:grave, till he too is gathered to the blessedness of the light. It is erroneous, however, to ascribe, as has been done, a doctrine of transmigration to the Manichaeans. Of course men's bodies as well as the souls of the unsaved, who according to the See also:oldest conception have in them no light whatever, fall under the sway of the See also:powers of darkness. A later view, adapted to the Christian. one, represents the portions of light in the unsaved as actually becoming lost. When the elements of 'light have at last been completely, or as far as possible, delivered from the world, the end of all things comes. All glorious spirits assemble, the God of light himself appears, accompanied by the aeons and the perfected just ones. The angels supporting the world withdraw themselves from their See also:burden, and everything falls in ruins. A tremendous conflagration consumes the world; the perfect separation of the two powers takes place once more; high above is the kingdom of light, again brought into a See also:condition of completeness, and deep below is the (? now powerless) darkness. Ethics, Social Polity and See also:Worship of the Manichaeans.—On the basis of such a cosmical philosophy, ethics can only have a dualistic ascetic character. Mamchaean ethics is not merely negative, how-ever, since it is necessary to cherish, strengthen and purify the elements of light, as well as free oneself from the elements of darkness. The aim is not self-destruction, but self-preservation; and yet the ethics of Manichaeism appears in point of fact as thoroughly ascetic. The Manichaean had, above all, to refrain from sensual enjoyment, shutting himself up against it by three See also:seals—the signaculum oris, manus and sinus. The signaculum oris forbids all eating of unclean See also:food (which included all bodies of animals, See also:wine, &c.—See also:vegetable See also:diet being allowed because See also:plants contained more light, though the killing of plants, or even plucking their See also:fruit and breaking their twigs, was not permitted), as well as all impure speech. The signaculum manus prohibits all See also:traffic with things generally, in so far as they carry in them elements of darkness. Finally, by the signaculum sinus every gratification of sexual desire, and hence also See also:marriage, are forbidden. Besides all this, life was further regulated by an exceedingly rigorous system of fasts. Certain astronomical conjunctions determined the selection of the fast-days, which in their total number amounted to nearly a See also:quarter of the year. See also:Sunday was regularly solemnized as one, and the practice was also generally observed on See also:Monday. See also:Hours of See also:prayer were determined with equal exactness. The Manichaean had to pray four times a day, each prayer being preceded by ablutions. The worshipper turned towards the sun, or the moon, or the See also:north, as the seat of light; but it is erroneous to conclude from this, as has been done, that in Manichaeism the sun and moon were themselves See also:objects of worship. Forms of prayer used by the Manichaeans have been preserved to us in the Fihrist. The prayers are addressed to the God of light, to the whole kingdom of light, to the glorious angels, and to Mani himself, who is apostrophized in them as " the great See also:tree, which is all salvation." According to Kessler, these prayers are closely related to the Mandaean and the ancient Babylonian See also:hymns. An See also:asceticism so strict and painful as that demanded by Manichaeism could only be practised by few; hence the religion must have abandoned all attempts at an extensive propaganda had it not conceded the principle of a twofold morality. A distinction was made in the commbnity between the electi (perfecti), the perfect Manichaeans, and the catechumeni (auditores), the See also:secular Manichaeans. Only the former submitted themselves to all the demands made by their religion; for the latter the stringency of the precepts was relaxed. They had to avoid See also:idolatry, sorcery, avarice, falsehood, fornication, &c.; above all, they were not allowed to kill any living being (the ten commandments of Mani). They had also to free themselves as much as possible from the world; but in truth they lived very much as their non-Manichaean See also:fellow-citizens. We have here essentially the same condition of things as in the See also:Catholic Church, where a twofold morality was also in force, that of the religious orders and that of secular Christians—only that the position of the electi in Manichaeism was a more distinguished one than that of the monks in Catholicism. For, after all, the Christian monks never quite forgot that salvation is given by God through Christ, whereas the Manichaean electi were actually themselves redeemers. Hence it was the See also:duty of the auditores to pay the greatest respect and most assiduous See also:attention to the electi. These " perfect ones," wasting away under their asceticism, were objects of admiration and of the most elaborate solicitude.' Food was presented to them in abundance, and by their eating it the electi set free the portions of light from the vegetables. They prayed for the auditores, they blessed them and interceded for them, thereby shortening the process of purification the latter had to pass through after death. It was only the electi, too, who possessed full knowledge of religious truths, a point of distinction from Catholicism. The distinction between electi and auditores, however, does not exhaust the conception of the Manichaean Church; on the contrary, the latter possessed a See also:hierarchy of three ranks, so that there were altogether five gradations in the community. These were regarded as a copy of the ranks of the kingdom of light. At the head stood the teachers (" the sons of meekness," Mani himself and his successors) ; then follow the administrators (" the sons of knowledge," the bishops) ; then the elders (" the sons of understanding," the presbyters) ; the electi (" the sons of mystery ") ; and finally the auditores (" the sons of insight "). The number of the electi must always have been small. According to Augustine the teachers were twelve and the bishops seventy-two in number. One of the teachers appears to have occupied the position of See also:superior at the head of the whole Manichaean Church. At least Augustine speaks of such a personage, and the Fihrist also has knowledge of a See also:chief of all Manichaeans. The constitution, therefore, had a monarchic head.
The worship of the Manichaeans must have been very See also:simple, and must have essentially consisted of prayers, hymns and ceremonies of See also:adoration. This simple service promoted the See also:secret dissemination of their doctrines. The Manichaeans too, at least in the West, appear to have adapted themselves to the Church's system of festivals. The electi celebrated See also:special feasts; but the principal festival with all classes was the See also:Bema (pitpa), the feast of the " teacher's See also:chair," held in See also:commemoration of the death of Mani in the See also:month of See also: The See also:legend of the Omophorus and Splenditeneus, rival giants who sustain earth and luminous heavens on their respective shoulders, even if it already figures in the See also:cuneiform texts of See also:Assyria, is yet to be traced in Mithraic bas-reliefs. It also may therefore have come to Mani through Magian channels. When, however, we turn to the numerous fragments of See also:authentic Manichaean liturgies and hymns lately discovered in Turfan in East See also:Turkestan, Mani's See also:direct indebtedness to the See also:cycle of Magian legends rather than to Chaldaic sources (as Kessler argued) is clearly exhibited. In fr. 472, taken from the Shapurakan, as part of a description of the sun-god in his See also:ship or See also:reservoir the sun, we have a mention of Az and See also:Ahriman and the devas (demons), the Pairikas. Az in the Avestan mythology was the demon See also:serpent who murders Gayomert in the old Persian legend, and an ally of Ahriman, as also are the Pairikas or Peris. In the same fragment we read of the ruin of Azidahaka Mazainya, which name See also:Darmesteter interprets in the Persian sources as the demon serpent, the sorcerer (See also:Ormazd et Ahriman, See also:Paris, 1877, p. 157). In fr. 470, descriptive of the conflagration of the world, we read of how, after Az and the demons have been struck down, the pious man is purified and led up to sun and moon and to the being of Ahura Mazda, the Divine. In another fragment (388) of a hymn Mani describes himself as " the first stranger " (cf. Matt. See also:xxv. 43), the son of the god Zarvan, the Ruler-See also:Child. In the orthodox literature of fire-worship Zarvan was See also:Time or Destiny. Later on Zarvan was elevated to the position of supreme principle, creator of Ormazd and Ahriman, and, long ' Analogous to this is the veneration in which the Catholic monks and the Neoplatonic " philosophers " were held; but the See also:prestige of the Manichaean electi was greater than that of the monks and the philosophers.before Mani, Zarvan accompanied See also:Mithras in all his westward migrations. In fr. 20, in an enumeration of angels, we hear of Narsus, who may be the Neryosang (Armenian Nerses or Narsai) of the Avesta. The other angels are See also:Jacob, the mighty See also:angel and leader of angels, the Lord See also:Bar Simus, Qaftinus the mighty, See also:Raphael, See also:Gabriel, See also:Michael, Sarael and Nastikus—a truly Catholic See also:list. In fr. 4 a See also:rubric enjoins the See also:recital of the hymn of the Frasegerd. Here we recognize a technical See also:term of the Avesta—namely, the Frasho-kereti," that is the reanimation of the world or resurrection of the dead' (Darmesteter, op. cit., p. 239). In this hymn we read how the gods shall See also:release us from this sinful time, from the oppression of this world. In fr. 4, under the rubric Bar Simus, we find the god Mihir (Mihryazd), the liberator, the compassionate, invoked along with Fredon, the good ; and later on we read as follows : " with his mighty glance may the god of pure name, Pred6n, the king and Jacob Nareman, protect religion and us the sons." Mihr or Mithras and Feridoun or Thraetaona, the slayer of Ajis (or Azi) Dahaka, also Nariman, spelled Nairimanau, are See also:familiar figures in the old Persian See also:pantheon. In the same prayer the votary begs that " new blessing may come, new victory from the god Zarvan over the glories and angels, the spirits of this world, to the end that he accept our holy religion, become a watcher within and without, helper and See also:protector," and the prayer ends thus: " I invoke the angels, the strong ones, the mighty, Raphael, Michael, Gabriel, Sarael, who shall protect us from all adversity, and free us from the wicked Ahriman." In fr. 176 Jesus is invoked: " Jesus, of the gods first new moon, See also:thou See also:art God. . . . Jesus, 0 Lord, of waxing fame full moon, O Jesus. Lord ...light, our See also:hearts' prayer. Jesus, God and Vahman. Sheen God! We will praise the God Naresaf. See also:Mar Mani will we bless. 0 new moon and See also:spring. Lord, we will bless. The angels, the gods . . . New sun, Mihr." In the above Vahman is Vohu Mano, the good thought or See also:inspiration of the Zoroastrian religion. Mihr is Mithras. The god Naresaf is also invoked in other fragments. In fr. 74 is invoked, together with Jesus and Mani, the " strong mighty Zrosch, the redeemer of souls." In the Avesta Sraosha is the angel that See also:guards the world at See also:night from demons, and is styled " the righteous or " the strong." Fr. 38 is as follows: " Mithras (MS. See also:Mitra) great . . . messenger of the gods, mediator (or interpreter) of religion, of the elect one esus—virgin of light. Mar Mani, Jesus—virgin of light, Mar aril. Do thou in me make peace, d light-bringer, mayest thou redeem my soul from this born-dead (existence)." Fr. 543 runs thus: . . and See also:ladder of the Mazdean faith. Thou, new teacher of Chorasan (of the East), and See also:promoter of those that have the good faith. For thou wast born under a glittering See also:star in the See also:family of the rulers. Elect are these—Jesus and Vahman." The above examples See also:bear out Mani's own declaration, as reported by the Fihrist, that his faith was a blend of the old Magian cult with Christianity. Whether the See also:Hebrew names of angels came to him direct from the Jews or not we cannot tell, but they were, as the Greek magical papyri prove, widely diffused among the Gentiles long before his age. The Armenian writer Eznik (c. 425) also attests that Mani's teaching was merely that of the Magi, plus an ascetic morality, for which they hated and slew him. Just as the background of Christianity was formed by the Hebrew scriptures, and just as the Hebrew legends of the creation became the basis of its See also:scheme of human redemption from evil, so the Avesta, with its See also:quaint cosmogony and myths, formed the background of Mani's new faith. He seems to have quarrelled with the later Magism because it was not dualistic enough, for in fr. 28 we have such a passage as the following: " They also that adore the fire, the burning, by this they them-selves recognize that their end shall be in fire. And they say that Ormuzd and Ahriman are See also:brothers, and in consequence of this saying they shall come to annihilation." In the same fragment the Christians are condemned as worshippers of idols, unless indeed the writer has genuine pagans in view. There is a mention of See also:Marcion in the same context, but it is unintelligible. There can be no doubt that in the form in which Mani became acquainted with it Christianity had been disengaged and liberated from the womb of Judaism which gave it birth. This presentation of it as an ethical system of universal import was the See also:joint work of Paul and Marcion. It remains to add that in these newly found fragments Mani styles himself " the apostle (lit. the sent forth) of Jesus the friend in the love of the Father, of God." He uses the formula: MANICHAEISM Manichaeism and See also:Buddhism.—It remains to be asked whether Buddhistic elements can also be detected in Manichaeism. Most See also:modern scholars since F. C. See also:Baur have answered this question in the affirmative. According to Kessler, Mani made use of the teaching of Buddha, at least as far as ethics was concerned. It cannot be doubted that Mani, who undertook long journeys as far as India, knew of Buddhism. The name Buddha (Buddas) which occurs in the legendary account of Mani, and perhaps in the latter's own writings, indicates further that he had occupied his attention with Buddhism when engaged in the work of See also:founding his new religion. But his borrowings from this source must have been quite insignificant. A detailed comparison shows the difference between Buddhism and Manichaeism in all their principal doctrines to be very great, while it becomes evident that the points of resemblance are almost everywhere accidental. This is also true of the ethics and the asceticism of the two systems. There is not a single point in Manichaeism which demands for its explanation an See also:appeal to Buddhism. Such being the See also:case, the relationship between the two religions remains a mere possibility, a possibility which the inquiry of Geyler (Das System See also:des Manichaeismus and sein Verhaltniss zum Buddhismus, See also:Jena, 1875) has not been able to elevate into a probability. The Secret of Manichaeism.—How are we to explain the rapid spread of Manichaeism, and the fact that it really became one of the great religions? What gave it strength was that it See also:united an ancient mythology and a thorough-going materialistic dualism with an exceedingly simple spiritual worship and a strict morality. On comparing it with the Semitic religions of nature we perceive that it was free from their sensuous cult us, substituting instead a spiritual worship as well as a strict morality. Manichaeism was thus able to satisfy the new wants of an old world. It offered revelation, redemption, moral virtue and See also:immortality, spiritual benefits on the basis of the religion of nature. A further source of strength See also:lay in the simple yet See also:firm social organization which was given by Mani himself to his new institution. The See also:wise man and the ignorant, the enthusiast and the man of the world, could all find See also:acceptance here, and there was laid on no one more than he was able and willing to bear. Each one, however, was attached and led onward by the prospect of a higher See also:rank to be attained, while the intellectually gifted had an additional inducement in the assurance that they did not require to submit themselves to any authority, but would be led to God by pure See also:reason. Thus adapted from the first to individual requirements, this religion also showed itself able to appropriate from time to time See also:foreign elements. Originally furnished from fragments of various religions, it could increase or diminish this See also:possession without rupturing its own elastic framework. And, after all, great adaptability is just as necessary for a universal religion as a divine founder in whom the highest revelation of God may be seen and reverenced. Manichaeism indeed, though it applies the title " redeemer " to Mani, has really no knowledge of a redeemer, but only of a physical and gnostic process of redemption; on the other hand, it possesses in Mani the supreme prophet of God. If we consider in conclusion that Manichaeism gave a simple, apparently profound, and yet convenient See also:solution of the problem of good and evil, a problem that had become peculiarly oppressive to the human See also:race in the and and 3rd centuries, we shall have named the most important factors which account for the rapid spread of the system. See also:Sketch of the History of Manichaeism.—Manichaeism first gained a firm footing in the East, i.e. in Persia, See also:Mesopotamia and Transoxiana. The persecutions it had to endure did not hinder its See also:extension. The seat of the Manichaean See also:pope was for centuries in Babylon, at a later period in See also:Samarkand. Even after the conquests of See also:Islam the Manichaean Church continued to maintain itself, indeed it seems to have become still more widely diffused by the victorious See also:campaigns of the Mahommedans, and it frequently gained secret adherents among the latter themselves. Its doctrine and discipline underwent little See also:change " Praise and See also:laud to the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit." In fr. 4 he attests that he was sprung from the See also:land See also:Babel; in fr. 566 that he was a physician from the land Babel. Fr. 3 recounts his interview with King Shapur I. The Gospel of See also:Peter seems to have been in use, for one lengthy See also:citation is taken from it in fr. 18. The Manichaeans of See also:Chinese Turkestan also used a version of the Shepherd of See also:Hermas. Several of the hymns (e.g. in fr. 7 and 32) reproduce the ideas and almost the phases of the Syriac " Hymn of the Soul," so confirming the See also:hypothesis that Mani was influenced by Bardesanes. With the exception of a few fragments written in a Pehlevi See also:dialect, all this recovered Manichaean literature is in the Ouigour or Vigur dialect of Tatar. The alphabet used is the one adapted by Mani himself from the Syriac estrangelo. The fragments are 800 in number, both on See also:paper and vellum, written and adorned with the pious care and good See also:taste which the Manichaeans are known to have bestowed on their See also:manuscripts. They were brought back by Professor Grunwedel and Dr Huth from Turfan in East Turkestan, and were partly translated by Dr F. W. K. See also: The religion which had proceeded from the historical Jesus he repudiated together with its founder, and Catholicism as well as Judaism he looked upon as a religion of the devil. But he distinguished between the Jesus of darkness and the Jesus of light who had lived and acted contemporaneously with the former. This distinction agrees with that shade by the gnostic See also:Basilides no less strikingly than the Manichaean See also:criticism of the Old Testament does with that propounded by the Marcionites (see the Acta Archelai, in which Mani is made to utter the antitheses of Marcion). Finally, the Manichaean doctrines exhibit points of similarity to those of the Christian Elkesaites. The historical relation of Mani to Christianity is then as follows. From Catholicism, which he very probably had no detailed knowledge of, he borrowed nothing, rejecting it as devilish error. On the other hand, he looked upon what he considered to be Christianity proper—that is, Christianity as it had been See also:developed among the sects of Basilidians, Marcionites, and perhaps Bardesanites, as a comparatively valuable and See also:sound religion. He took from it the moral teaching of the See also:Sermon on the See also:Mount, and a criticism of the Old Testament and of Judaism so far as he required it. Indications of the See also:influence of Marcionitism are found in the high estimation in which Mani held the apostle Paul, and in the fact that he explicitly rejects the Book of Acts. Mani appears to have given recognition to a portion of the historical matter of the Gospels, and to have interpreted it in accordance with his own doctrine. in the East; in particular, it drew no nearer to the Christian religion. More than once, however, Manichaeism experienced attempts at See also:reformation; for of course the auditores very easily became worldly in character, and movements of reformation led temporarily to divisions and the formation of sects. Towards the close of the loth century, at the time the Fihirst was written, the Manichaeans in Mesopotamia and Persia had already been in large measure ousted from the towns, and had withdrawn to the villages. But in Turkestan, and as far as the Chinese frontier, there existed numerous Manichaean communities and even whole tribes that had adopted the name of Mani. Probably it was the great migrations of the Mongolian race that first put an end to Manichaeism in Central See also:Asia. But even in the 15th century there were Manichaeans living beside the See also: In its rejection of this doctrine Manichaeism agreed with Neo-Platonism; but, while the latter, notwithstanding all its attempts to conform itself to Christianity, could find no formula by which to inaugurate within its own limits the special veneration of Christ, the Western Manichaeans succeeded in giving their teaching a Christian tinge. The only part of the Manichaean mythology that became popular was the crude, physical dualism. The barbaric elements were judiciously screened from view as a " mystery "; they were, indeed, here•and there explicitly disavowed even by the initiated. The farther Manichaeism advanced into the West the more Christian and philosophic did it become. In See also:Syria it maintained itself in See also:comparative purity. In North Africa it found its most numerous adherents, gaining secret support even among the See also:clergy. Augustine was an auditor for nine years, while Faustus was at that time the most esteemed Manichaean teacher in the West. Augustine in his later writings against the Manichaeans deals chiefly with the following problems: (I) the relation between knowledge and faith, and between reason and authority; (2) the nature of good and evil, and the origin of the latter; (3) the existence of free will, and its relation to the divine omnipotence; (4) the relation of the evil in the world to the divine See also:government. The Christian See also:Byzantine and Roman emperors, from See also:Valens onwards, enacted strict See also:laws against the Manichaeans. But at first these See also:bore little fruit. The auditores were difficult to trace out, and besides they really gave little occasion for per-. secution. In See also:Rome itself between 370 and 440 Manichaeism gained a large amount of support, especially among the scholars and public teachers. It also made its way into the life of the See also:people by means of a popular literature in which the apostles Xvf. 19were made to See also:play a prominent part (Apocryphal Acts of the Apostles). Manichaeism in the West had also some experience of attempts at reformation from the ascetic side, but of these we know little. In Rome See also:Leo the Great was the first who took energetic See also:measures, along with the See also:state authorities, against the system. Valentinian III. decreed banishment against its adherents, Justinian the See also:punishment of death. In North Africa Manichaeism appears to have been extinguished by the persecution of the See also:Vandals. But it still continued to exist elsewhere, both in the Byzantine Empire and in the West, and in the earlier part of the See also:middle ages it gave an impulse to the formation of new sects, which remained related to it. And if it has not been quite proved that so early as the 4th century the Priscillianists of Spain were influenced by Manichaeism, it is at least undoubted that the See also:Paulicians and Bogomiles, as well as the Catharists and the Albigenses, are to be traced back to Manichaeism (and Marcionitism). Thus the system, not indeed of Mani the Persian, but of Manichaeism as modified by Christian influences, accompanied the Catholic Church until the 13th century. Sources.—(a) Oriental. Among the sources for a history of Manichaeism the most important are the Oriental. Of these the Mahommedan, though of comparatively late date, are distinguished by the excellent manner in which they have been transmitted to us, as well as by their impartiality. They must be named first, because ancient Manichaean writings have been used in their construction. At the head of all stands En-Nedim, Fihrist (c. 980), ed. by See also:Flugel (1871–1872); cf. the latter's work Mani, See also:seine Lehre u. seine Schriften (1862). See also See also:Shahrastani, Kitab al-milal wannuhal (12th cent.), ed. by See also:Cureton (1846) and translated into German by Haarbriicker (1851), and individual notes and excerpts by See also:Tabari (loth cent.), Al-Biruni (11th cent.), and other Arabian and Persian historians. Next come the Turfan fragments described in the See also:body of this See also:article. See also W. Brandt, Schriften aus der Genza See also:oder Sidva See also:Rabba (See also:Gottingen, 1893). Of the Christian Orientals those that afford most information are Ephraem Syrus (d. 373), in various writings; the Armenian Esnik (German See also:translation by J. M. Schmid, See also:Vienna, 1900, see also Zeitsch. f. hist. Theol., 1840, ii.; See also:Langlois, Collection, ii. 375 seq.), who wrote in the 5th century against Marcion and Mani; and the Alexandrian See also:patriarch Eutychius d. 916), Annales, ed. See also:Pococke (1628). There are, besides, scattered pieces of information in See also:Aphraates (4th cent.), Barhebraeus (13th cent.) and others. The newly found Syriac Book of Scholiasof Theodor bar Khouni (see Pognon, See also:Les Coupes de Kouabir, Paris, 1898) gives many details about Mani's teaching (also ed. without translation by Dr M. Lewin, Berlin, 1905). (b) Greek and Latin. The earliest mention of the Manichaeans in the Graeco-Roman Empire is to be found in an edict of Diocletian (see Hanel, See also:Cod. Gregor., tit. xv.), which is held by some to be See also:spurious, while others assign it to one or other of the years 287, 290, 296, 308 (SO See also:Mason, The Persec. of Diocl., pp. 275 seq.). Eusebius gives a short account of the sect (H. E., vii. 31). It was the Ada Archelai, however, that became the principal source on the subject of Manichaeism for Greek and Roman writers. These Acta are not indeed what they give themselves out for, viz. an account of a disputation held between Mani and the bishop Archelaus of Cascar, rn Mesopotamia; but they nevertheless contain much that is See also:trust-worthy; especially regarding the doctrine of Mani, and they also include Manichaean documents. They consist of various distinct pieces, and originated in the beginning of the 4th century, probably at See also:Edessa. They were translated as early as the first See also:half of the same century from the Syriac (as is maintained by See also:Jerome, De vir. illust., 72; though this is doubted by modern scholars) into Greek, and soon afterwards into Latin. It is only this secondary Latin version that we possess (ed. by C. H. Beeson, See also:Leipzig, 1906, under title Hegemonius acta Archelai) ; earlier See also:editions, Zacagni (1698) ; See also:Routh, Reliquiae See also:sac., vol. v. (1848); translated in See also:Clark's Ante-Nicene Library, vol. xx.); small fragments of the Greek version have been preserved. Regarding the Acta Archelai, see Zittwitz in Zeitschr. f. d. histor. Theol. (1873) and Oblasinski, Acta disp. See also:Arch. et Manetis (18i4). In the form in which we now possess them, they are a compilation after the See also:pattern of the Clementine Homilies, and have been subjected to manifold redactions. These Acta were used by See also:Cyril of See also:Jerusalem (Catech. 6), Epiphanius (Haer. 66), and a great number of other writers. All the Greek and Latin heresiologists have included the Manichaeans in their catalogues; but they seldom adduce any See also:independent information regarding them (see See also:Theodoret, Haer. fab. i. 26). Important matter is to be found in the resolutions of the See also:councils from the 4th century onwards (see Mansi, Acta concil., and See also:Hefele, Conciliengeschichte, vols. i.-iii.), and also in the controversial writings of Titus of Bostra (6th century), IIpds Mavrxaiovs (ed. See also:Lagarde, 18J9), and of See also: 179 Biblioth.). The struggle with the Paulicians and the Bogomiles, who were often simply identified with the Manichaeans, again directed attention to the latter. In the West the works of Augustine are the great repertory for information on the subject of Manichaeism (Contra epistolam Manichaei, quam vocant fundamenti ; Contra Faustum Manichaeum; Contra Fortunatum; Contra Adimantum; Contra Secundinum; De actis cum Felice Manichaeo; De penesi c. Manichaeos; De natura See also:boni; De duabus animabus; De ut-tlitate credendi ; De moribus eccl. cathol. et de moribus Manichaeorum ; De haeres.). The more complete the picture, however, which may here be obtained of Manichaeism, the more cautious must we be in making generalizations from it, for it is beyond doubt that Western Manichaeism adopted Christian elements which are wanting in the original and in the Oriental Manichaeism. The " Dispute of Paul the Persian with a Manichaean " in See also:Migne P.G., 88, See also:col. 529–578 (first ed. by A. See also:Mai) is shown by G. Mercati, Studi e testi (Rome, 1901) to be the proces verbal of an actual discussion held under Justinian at See also:Constantinople in 527. Additional information and CommentsThere are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click, and select "copy." Then paste it into your website, email, or other HTML. Site content, images, and layout Copyright © 2006 - Net Industries, worldwide. |
|
[back] MANIA |
[next] MANIFEST (Lat. manifestus, clear, open to view) |