Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
PHOENICIA , in See also:ancient See also:geography, the name given to that See also:part of the seaboard of See also:Syria which extends from the Eleutherus (Nahr el-See also:Kehl-0 in the See also:north to Mt See also:Carmel in the See also:south, a distance of rather more than two degrees of See also:latitude. These limits, however, were exceeded at various times; thus, north of the Eleutherus See also:lay Aradus and Marathus, and south of Carmel the border sometimes included Dor and even See also:Joppa. Formed partly by See also:alluvium carried down by perennial streams from the mountains of See also:Lebanon and See also:Galilee, and fringed by See also:great See also:sand-See also:dunes which the See also:sea throws up, Phoenicia is covered with a See also:rich and fertile See also:soil. It is only at the mouth of the Eleutherus and at See also:Acre ('See also:Akka) that the See also:strip of See also:coast-See also:land widens out into plains of any See also:size; there is a certain amount of open See also:country behind See also:Beirut; but for the most part the mountains, pierced by deep See also:river-valleys, approach to within a few See also:miles of the coast, or even right down to the sea, as at See also:Ras en-Naliura (Scala Tyriorum, Jos. See also:Bell. See also:jud. ii. ro, 2) and Ras el-Abiad (See also:Pliny's Promunturium See also:Album), where a passage had to be cut in the See also:rock for the See also:caravan road which from See also:time immemorial traversed this narrow See also:belt of, See also:lowland. From the flanks of Lebanon, especially from the heights which See also:lie to the north of the Qasimiyeh or 1(asimiya (See also:Litany) River, the traveller looks down upon some of the finest landscape in the See also:world; in See also:general features the scenery is not unlike that of the See also:Italian See also:Riviera, but surpasses it in grandeur and a See also:peculiar See also:depth of colouring. With regard to natural products the country has few See also:worth mentioning; minerals are found in the Lebanon, but not in any quantity; traces of See also:amber-digging have been discovered on the coast; and the See also:purple See also:shell (murex trunculus and brandaris) is still plentiful. The harbours which played so important a part in antiquity are nearly all silted up, and, with the exception of Beirut, afford no safe anchorage for the large vessels of See also:modern times. A few bays, facing towards the north, break the coast-See also:line, and small rocky islands are dotted here and there just off the See also:shore. See also:Sidon, See also:Tyre and Aradus, though now connected with the mainland, were built originally upon islands; the Phoenicians preferred such sites, because they were convenient for See also:shipping and easily defended against attack. The See also:chief towns of ancient Phoenicia, as we know of them from the Amarna tablets (15th See also:century B.C.) and from See also:Egyptian, See also:Assyrian and the Old Testament documents, were the following: Acco (now Acre or 'Akka, Judg. 1. 31), Achzib (now ez-Zib, ibid.), Ahlab (in Assyrian Mahalhba, ibid.)—three towns on the coast south of Tyre, Kanah (Josh. xix. 28), Tyre (Phoen. S(5r, now Sur), Zarephath i or Sarepta (1 See also:Kings xvii. 9 now Sarafand), Sidon (now Saida), Berytus (Biruta in Egyptian, Biruna in the Amarna tablets, now Beirut), Byblus (in Phoen. and Hebr. Gebal, now See also:Jebeil), Arka, 8o m. north of Sidon (Gen. x. 17, now `See also:Arta), See also:Sin (Assyr. Siannu, ibid.) Simyra (Gen. x. 18, now Sumra), Marathus (now Amrit) not important till the Macedonian See also:period, Arvad or Aradus (in Phoen. Arwad, now Ruad, Gen. x. 18; Ezek. See also:xxvii. 8, II), the most northerly of the great Phoenician towns, and always famous as a maritime See also:state. See also:Race and See also:Language.—The Phoenicians were an See also:early offshoot from the Semitic stock, and belonged to the Canaanite See also:branch of it. Curiously enough in Gen. x. Sidon, the " first-See also:born " of See also:Canaan, is classed among the descendants of See also:Ham; but the table of nations in Gen. x. is not arranged upon strict ethnographic principles; perhaps religious antagonism induced the See also:Hebrews to assign to the Canaanites an ancestry different from their own; at any See also:rate the See also:close connexion which existed from an early date between the Phoenicians and the Egyptians may have suggested the See also:idea that both peoples belonged to the same race. The Phoenicians themselves retained some memory of having migrated from older seats on an eastern sea; See also:Herodotus (i. 1; vii. 89) calls it the " red sea," meaning probably the
tI
PHOENICIA
and later, by which time the language must have undergone a certain amount of decay.5 Indirectly, however, the Phoenicians rendered one great service to literature; they took a large See also:share in the development and See also:diffusion of the See also:alphabet which forms the See also:foundation of See also:Greek (See also:Herod. v. 58) and of all See also:European See also:writing. The Phoenician letters in their earlier types are practically identical with those used by the Hebrews (e.g. the Siloam inscr. See also:NSI. No. 2), the Moabites (e.g the Mesha See also: Nos. 61-63). They passed through various modifications in the course of time; after leaving the See also:mother country the script acquires a more cursive; flowing See also:style on the stones from See also:Cyprus and See also:Attica; the tendency becomes more strongly marked at the Punic See also:stage; until in the neo-Punic, from the destruction of See also:Carthage (146 B.c.) to the 1st century A.D., both the writing and the language reached their most degenerate See also:form. As a rustic See also:dialect the language lasted on in North See also:Africa till the 5th century A.D. In his sermons St See also:Augustine frequently quotes Punic words. See also:History.—The Phoenicians, in See also:imitation of the Egyptians, claimed that their See also:oldest cities had been founded by the gods themselves, and that their race could boast an antiquity of 30,000 years (See also:Africanus in See also:Syncellus, Early period. p. 31). Herodotus quotes (ii. 44) a more moderate tradition which placed the foundation of Tyre 2300 years before his time, i.e., c. 2756 B.C. According to See also:Justin (xviii. 3) the Phoenicians, who had See also:long been settled on the coast and occupied Sidon, founded Tyre in the See also:year before the fall of See also:Troy; possibly the date 1198 B.C., given by See also:Menander of See also:Ephesus (in Jos. See also:Ant. viii. 3, 1 and c. A p. i. 18) as that from which the era of Tyre begins, may refer to the See also:epoch which Justin mentions. Little certainty, however, can be allowed to these traditional chronologies. It is probable that in remote ages Babylonia exercised a considerable See also:influence upon Syria and its coast towns; but Mr L. W. See also: 2, 1907).
The See also:extension of the Egyptian See also:empire in the direction of See also:Asia began about 1600 B.C. under Almosi (Aahmes, See also:Amasis) I., the founder of the XVIIIth See also:Dynasty, who carried Egyptian his arms into Syria, and conquered at least See also:Palestine See also:Rule
and Phoenicia, the latter being the country called c. moo-Pa-hi on the Egyptian monuments (See also: Another city on the sea is called a haven, D'ar (Tyre) is its name, See also:water is carried to it in boats; it is richer in See also:fish than in sands." 6 But the fullest See also:information about the state of Phoenicia in the 15th and 14th centuries B.C. comes from the Amarna tablets, among which are many letters from the subject princes and the Egyptian See also:governors of Phoenicia to the See also:Pharaoh.7 It was a time of much See also:political disturbance. The See also:Hittites (q.v.) were invading Syria; nomads from the See also:desert supported the invasion; and many of the See also:local chiefs were ready to seize the opportunity to throw off the yoke of Egypt. The towns of Phoenicia were ' For the Phoen. inscrr. see Corpus inscriptionum semiticarum, pt. i., brought up to date provisionally by Repertoire d'epigr. sent. A selection is published by Lidzbarski, Handbuch d. nordsem. Epigraphik (1898); See also:Cooke, Textbook of North-Semitic See also:Inscriptions (1903), with See also:translations and notes; See also:Landau, Beitrdge z. Altertumsk. d. Orients (1899—1906) ; Lidzbarski, Altsem. Texte (1907), pt. i. ' See W. M. Muller, loc. cit. pp. 57, 172 sqq., 184 sqq. ; Jeremias, See also:Des A. T. See also:im Lichte d. alt. Orients,. p. 302 seq. ; Records of the Past, ii. 109 seq. r Winckler, Tell-el-Am. Letters Nos. 37 sqq. ; See also:Petrie, Syria and Egypt in the Tell el Am. Letters. Persian Gulf; the tradition, therefore, seems to show that the to the 6th century B.C.; the See also:majority belong to the 4th century Phoenicians believed that their ancestors came originally from Babylonia. By settling along the Syrian coast they See also:developed a strangely un-Semitic love for the sea, and advanced on different lines from the other Canaanites who occupied the interior. They called themselves Canaanites and their land Canaan; such is their name in the Amarna tablets, Kinahhi and Kinahni; and with this agrees the statement assigned to Hecataeus (Fr. hist. gr. i. 17) that Phoenicia was formerly called Xv a, a name which See also:Philo of Byblus adopts into his See also:mythology by ,naking " Chna who was afterwards called Phoinix " the eponym of the Phoenicians (Fr. hist.gr. iii. 569). In the reign of See also:Antiochus IV. and his successors the coins of See also:Laodicea of Libanus See also:bear the See also:legend " Of Laodicea which is in Canaan ";1 the Old Testament also sometimes denotes Phoenicia and Phoenicians by " Canaan" and " Canaanites " (Isa. See also:xxiii. 11; Obad. 20; Zeph. i. 11), though the latter names generally have a more ex-tended sense. But " Sidonians " is the usual designation both in the Old Testament and in the Assyrian monuments (Sidunnu); and even at the time of Tyre's greatest ascendancy we read of Sidonians and not Tyrians in the Old Testament and in See also:Homer; thus Ethbaal king of Tyre (Jos. Ant. viii. 13, 2) is called king of the Sidonians in 1' Kings xvi. 31. In the Homeric poems we meet with Iu3bvun, Zu3ovirt (Od. iv. 618; Il. vi. 290; Od. xiii. 285; II. Vi. 291) and d?oivcxes, rl^ocvircrl (Od. xiii. 272, xiv. 288 seq., &c.), and both terms together (Od. iv. 83 seq., H. xxiii. 743 seq.)2 And the Phoenicians themselves used Sidonians as a general name; thus in the oldest Phoenician inscription known (CIS. i. 5=NSI., No. 11), Hiram II. king of Tyre in the 8th century is styled " king of the Sidonians." But among the Greeks " Phoenicians " was the name most in use,'Foivuces (plur. of 4 oivc) for the See also:people and 'I o vi .for the land (cf. Pnonuxx). The former was probably the older word, and may be traced to 4oLvbs=" See also:blood-red "; the Canaanite sailors were spoken of as the " red men " on See also:account of their sunburnt skin; then the land from which they came was called after them; and then probably the See also:original connexion between 4'oIvi and Ocvos was forgotten, and new forms and meanings were invented. Thus 0oZvet came to mean a " date-See also:palm "; but the date-palm is not in the least characteristic of Phoenicia, and can hardly grow there; 4o-ive in this sense has no connexion with the original meaning of Phoenician. A derivation has been sought elsewhere, and the Egyptian Fenh proposed as the origin of the name; but the word Fenh was apparently used of See also:Asiatic barbarians in general, without any See also:special reference to the Phoenicians (W. M. Muller, Asien u. See also:Europa, p. 208 seq.). The See also:Lat. Poenus is of course merely an See also:adaptation of the Greek form.3 Language.—Inscriptions, coins, topographical names preserved by Greek and Latin writers, names of persons and the Punic passages in the Poenulus of See also:Plautus, all show conclusively that the Phoenician language belonged to the North-Semitic See also:group, and to that sub-See also:division of it which is called the Canaanite and includes See also:Hebrew and the dialect of See also:Moab. A comparison between Phoenician and Hebrew reveals close resemblances both in grammatical forms and in vocabulary ; in some respects older features have been preserved in Phoenician, others are later, others again are peculiar to the dialect; many words poetic or rare or See also:late in Hebrew are See also:common in Phoenician. Hence we may conclude that the two See also:languages developed independently from a common ancestor, which can be no other, than the ancient Canaanite, of which a few words have survived in the Canaanite glosses to the Amarna tablets (written in Babylonian).' But in forming an estimate of the Phoenician language it must be remembered that our material is scanty and limited in range; the Phoenicians were in no sense a See also:literary people; moreover, with one exception (CIS. i. 5), almost all the inscriptions are subsequent ' Cooke, North-Semitic Inscriptions (elsewhere abbreviated NSI.), No. 149 B. 8. 2 In this passage " Phoenicians " is a general name for See also:carriers of See also:commerce, not the inhabitants of a particular country. Similarly " Sidonian " in Il. vi. 209, is taken to mean Semites in general. Elsewhere " Phoenicians " are merchants, kidnappers, &c., ` Sidonians " are artists; to indicate See also:nationality both names seem to be used indifferently, e.g. Od. xiii. 272, xiv. 288, xv. 414. ' See especially Pietschmann, Gesch. d. Phonizier, 13 sqq., and Winkler, Keilinschr. u. d. A. T., 3rd ed., 127. *A vocabulary is given in KAT.', 652 seq.; see further BShh, See also:Die Sprache.d. Amarnabriefe (19o9). divided; Aradus, Simyra, Sidon supported the See also:rebellion; Ribhabad, the See also:vassal of Byblus, and Abi-melech, king of Tyre, held out for Egypt; but while all the towns made professions of fidelity, they were scheming for their own interests, and in the end Egypt lost them all except Byblus. The tablets which reveal this state of affairs are written in the language and script of Babylonia, and thus show indirectly the extent to which Babylonian culture had penetrated Palestine and Phoenicia; at the same time they illustrate the closeness of the relations between the Canaanite towns and the dominant See also:power of Egypt. After the reign of Amenophis IV. (1376-1366) that power collapsed altogether; but his successors attempted to recover it, and Ramses (See also:Rameses) II. reconquered Phoenicia as far as Beirut, and carved three tablets on the rock beside the Nahr el-Kelb to commemorate his victories; under the XIXth and XXth Dynasties this seems to have remained the See also:northern limit of the Egyptian Empire. But in the reign of Ramses III. (c. 1200) great changes began to occur owing to the invasion of Syria by peoples from Asia See also:Minor and See also:Europe, which ended in the See also:establishment of the See also:Philistines on the coast near Ashkelon. The successors of Ramses III. lost their hold over Canaan; the XXIst Dynasty no longer intervened in the affairs of Syria; but Sheshonk (Shishak), the founder of the XXIInd Dynasty, about 928 B.C. endeavoured to assert the ancient supremacy of Egypt (cf. t Kings xiv. 25 sqq.), but his successes were not lasting, and, as we learn from the Old Testament, the power of Egypt became henceforward practically ineffective. Not until 6o8 did a Pharaoh (Necho) See also:lead an Egyptian See also:army so far north, and he was defeated by See also:Nebuchadrezzar. During the period which elapsed before the rise of the Assyrian power in Syria the Phoenicians were See also:left to themselves. This was the period of their development, and Tyre became the leading city of Phoenicia. Between the withdrawal of the Egyptian rule in Syria and the western advance of See also:Assyria there comes an See also:interval during Indepen- which the city-states of Phoenicia owned no suzerain. dente of The history of this period is mainly a history of Phoenkia- Tyre, which not only See also:rose to a sort of See also:hegemony among the Phoenician states, but founded colonies beyond the seas (below). From 970 to 772 B.C. the See also:bare outline of events is supplied by extracts from two Hellenistic historians, Menander of Ephesus and Dius (largely dependent upon Menander), which have been preserved by See also:Josephus, Ant. viii. 5, 3 and c. Ap. i. 17, 18. From the data given in these passages we learn that Hiram I., son of Abi-See also:baal, reigned in Tyre from 970 to 936 B.C. He enlarged the See also:island-town to the east, restored and enriched the temples, built new ones to Heracles (i.e. 1M1elkarth or Melqarth) and See also:Astarte, founded the feast of the awakening of Heracles in the See also:month Peritius, and reduced the inhabitants of See also:Utica to their See also:allegiance. The Tyrian See also:annals, moreover, alluded to the connexion between Hiram and See also:Solomon. Before this time, indeed, the Phoenicians had no doubt lived on friendly terms with the Israelites ' (cf. See also:Judges v. 17; Gen. xlix. 13); but the two nations seem to have See also:drawn closer in the time of Solomon. 2 Sam. v. 11, which brings See also:David and Hiram together, probably antedates what happened in the following reign. For Solomon's See also:palace and See also:temple Hiram contributed See also:cedar and See also:fir trees as well as workmen, receiving in See also:exchange large See also:annual payments of oil and See also:wine, supplies which Phoenicia must have drawn regularly from Israelite districts (1 Kings v. 9, 1r; cf. Ezek. xxvii. 17; Ezr. 7; Acts xii. 20; Jos. Ant. xiv. Io, 6); finally, in return for the See also:gold which he furnished for the temple, Hiram received the See also: The See also:list of Hiram's successors given by Josephus indicates frequent changes of dynasty until the time of Ithobal I. See also:priest of Astarte, whose reign (887—855) marks a return to more settled rule. In contrast to Hiram I., king of Tyre, Ithobal or Ethbaal is styled in 1 Kings xvi. 31 " king of the Sidonians," i.e. of the Phoenicians, showing that in the interval the kings of Tyre had extended their rule over the other Phoenician cities. Under Ethbaal further expansion is recorded; Botrys north of Byblus and Aoza in North Africa are said to have been founded by him; the more famous Carthage owed its origin to the See also:civil discords which followed the See also:death of Metten I. (820), his next successor but one. According to tradition, Metten's son See also:Pygmalion (820-773) slew the See also:husband of his See also:sister Elissa or See also:Dido; whereupon she fled and founded Carthage (q.v.) in See also:Libya (813; Justin xviii. 4-6). At this point Josephus's extracts from Menander come to an end. From the time of Ethbaal onwards the See also:independence of Phoenicia was threatened by the advance of Assyria. So far back as Itoo B.c. Tiglath-pileser I. had invaded North Assyrian Phoenicia, and in See also:order to secure a See also:harbour on the Rule, 876-coast he occupied Arvad (Aradus); but no permanent 6058.c-occupation followed. In the 9th century, however, the systematic conquest of the See also:west began. In 876 B.C. See also:Assur-nazir-See also:pal III. " washed his weapons in the great sea," and exacted See also:tribute from the kings of Tyre, Sidon, Byblus and other cities, including Arvad (Keilinschr. Bibliothek, i. 1o9). The inscriptions of his son See also:Shalmaneser II. mention the taking of tribute from the Tyrians and Sidonians in 846 and again in 849; the Byblians are included at the latter date, and among the kings defeated at Karkar in 854 or 853 was Metten-baal, king of the Arvadites (ibid. pp. 141, 143, 173). Thus Shalmaneser completed the conquests of his predecessor on the Phoenician coast, and established a supremacy which lasted for over a See also:hundred years and was acknowledged by occasional payments of tribute. In 741 Tiglath-pileser III. mentions on his tribute-lists " IJirfm of Tyre "; and here for the first time a piece of native evidence becomes available. The earliest Phoenician inscription at See also:present known (CIS. i. 5=NSI. No. II) is engraved upon the fragments of a See also:bronze bowl dedicated by a certain See also:governor of Qarth-hadasht (or Karti-Hadasti, " New City," i.e. See also:Citium), " servant of Iiiram king of the Sidonians to Baal of Lebanon." It is to be noted that this Hiram II. was not only king of Tyre, as the Assyrian inscription calls him, but of Sidon too; and further, that by this time Tyre had established a See also:colony in Cyprus (q.v.). In Tiglath-pileser's See also:Philistine campaign of 734 Byblus and Aradus paid tribute, and an Assyrian chief officer (the See also:Rab-shakeh) was sent to Tyre and extorted from the king, now Metten or Mattun, the large sum of 150 talents of gold (KB. ii. 23). For the period which follows a certain amount of information is furnished by Menander (in Jos. Ant. ix. 14, 2). Elulaeus IX., in Assyrian See also:Lull, who ruled under the name of Pylas, was king of Tyre, Sidon, and other cities at this time (c. 725-690), and at the beginning of his reign suffered from an invasion by Shalmaneser IV. or Salampsas (Jos.); this was probably the expedition against See also:Hoshea of See also:Samaria in 725; " the king of Assyria .. . overran all Phoenicia, but soon made See also:peace with them all and returned back." In the reign of Sargon Phoenicia itself seems to have been left alone; but the inhabitants of Citium revolted, showing that the authority of Tyre in Cyprus had grown weak; and Sargon received the submission of seven See also:Cyprian princes, and set up in Larnaca (probably in 709) the triumphal See also:stele now in the See also:Berlin Museum (See also:Schrader, Cuneif. Inscr. and O. T., and ed., vol. ii. p. 87). But Elulaeus, according to Menander, suppressed the revolt of Citium, and early in the reign of See also:Sennacherib joined the See also:league of Philistia and See also:Judah, which had considerable effect upon the' cities of Phoenicia (above, Justin xviii. 3). In the Tyrian annals (Jos. c. Ap. i. 18) the reference was probably to the See also:felling of See also:timber in Lebanon for Hiram's temples; Josephus then .misinterpreted this by r Kings v. 6. in alliance with Egypt and See also:Ethiopia, which aimed at throwing off the oppressive tyranny of Assyria; as usual, however, the city-states of Phoenicia could not combine even against a common foe, and several See also:broke away from Tyre, so Menander tells us, and sided with Assyria. In the great campaign of Tor Sennacherib came down upon the revolting provinces; he forced Luli, king of Sidon, to See also:fly ,for See also:refuge to Cyprus, took his chief cities, and set up See also:Tuba'lu (Ethbaal) as king, imposing a yearly tribute (KB. ii. 91). The See also:blockade of Tyre by sea, significantly passed over in Sennacherib's inscription, is described by Menander. The island-city proved to be impregnable, but it was the only See also:possession left of what had been the extensive See also:kingdom of Elulaeus. Sennacherib, however, so far accomplished his See also:object as to break up the See also:combination of Tyre and Sidon, which had grown into a powerful state.' At Sidon the successor of Ethbaal was Abd-milkath; in alliance with a Cilician chief he rebelled against Esarhaddon about the year 678, with disastrous consequences. Sidon was annihilated; Abd-milkath See also:fell into the hands of Esarhaddon, who founded a new Sidon on the mainland, peopled it with foreigners, and called it after his own name. The old name, however, survived in popular usage; but the See also:character of the city was changed, and till the time of See also:Cyrus the kingdom of Sidon ceased to exist (KB. ii. 125 seq., 145; KAT.' 88). Tyre also came in for its share of hardship. Elulaeus was followed by Baal, who in 672 consented to join Tirhaka, the Ethiopian king of Egypt, in a rebellion against Assyria. Esarhaddon, on his way to Egypt for the second time, determined to See also:deal out See also:punishment; he blockaded Tyre, and raised earthworks on the shore and cut off the water-See also:supply; but he did not See also:capture the city itself. His See also:monument found at Zenjirli represents the great king holding Baal of Tyre and Tirhaka of Egypt by cords fastened in their lips;2 there is no evidence, however, that he actually took either of them prisoner. Early in the reign of Assur-bani-pal Tyre was besieged again (668), but Assur-bani-pal succeeded no better than his predecessors. Nevertheless Baal submitted in the end, along with the princes of Gebal and Arvad, See also:Manasseh of Judah, and the other Canaanite chiefs; in the island of Cyprus the Assyrians carried all before them (KB. ii. 149 seq., 169, 173). On his return from the Arabian campaign Assur-bani-pal severely punished the rebellious inhabitants of Ushu (Palaetyrus) and Akko, and transported the survivors to Assyria (ibid. 229). In Phoenicia, as elsewhere, Assyrian rule created nothing and left nothing behind it but a record of barbarous conquest and See also:extortion. An interesting sidelight is thrown upon this period by the list of the Thalassocracies in the Chronicon of See also:Eusebius (p. 226, ed. Schoene), which places the 45 years of the sea-power of Phoenicia at a date which, with much See also:probability, may be conjectured to lie between 709, when Cyprus submitted to Sargon, and 664, when Egypt threw off the rule of Assyria. If this dating is correct, and the Phoenician sea-power was at its height during these years, we can understand why Tyre gave so much trouble to the Assyrian kings.' In the last crisis of the dying power of Assyria the Egyptians for a See also:short time laid hands on Phoenicia; but after their defeat The Neo- at the See also:battle of Carchemish (6o5), the Chaldaeans Babylonian became the masters of western Asia. See also:Jeremiah's Period, 605-allusion (See also:xxv. 22) in 604 to the approaching downfall 538 B.C. of the kings of Tyre and Sidon and the coast-land beyond the sea, i.e. the Phoenician settlements on the Mediterranean, seems to imply that the Phoenician states recovered some measure of independence; if they did it cannot have lasted long. In 588 See also:Apries (Pharaoh Hophra) made an See also:attempt The above See also:interpretation of Menander and the Assyrian evidence is based upon Ed. See also:Meyer, Ency. Bib. See also:col. 3755. For a different explanation see Landau; Beitr. z. Altertumsk. d. Or. vol. i., followed by Winckler, Altor. Forsch. ii. 65 sqq.; these scholars take Menander to refer to the later See also:war of Esarhaddon and Assur-bani-pal against Baal of Tyre.
2 See the facsimile in Ausgrabungen in Sendschirli (Berlin, 1893), and 17 for the above interpretation of it.
See also: 161; Diod. Sic. i. 68). Some of the Phoenician chiefs, among them Ithobal II., the new king of Tyre, while forced to yield to a See also:change of masters, were bold enough to declare their hostility to the Babylonians. This state of affairs did not See also:escape the vigilance of Nebuchadrezzar. After the fall of See also:Jerusalem he marched upon Phoenicia; Apries withdrew his army, and the See also:siege of Tyre began. For thirteen years the great See also:merchant city held out (585–573; Jos. C. Ap. i. 21; cf. Ezek. xxvi: seq.). See also:Ezekiel says that Nebuchadrezzar and his See also:host had no See also:reward for their heavy service against Tyre, and the presumption is that the city capitulated on favourable terms; for Ithobal's reign ends with the close of the siege, and the royal See also:family is subsequently found in See also:Babylon. The king appointed by Nebuchadrezzar was Baal II. (574–564), after whose death a See also:republic was formed under a single suffete or " See also:judge " (shofet). Josephus (loc. cit.) is again our authority for the changes of See also:government which followed until the See also:monarchy was revived. At length under Hiram III. Phoenicia passed from the Chaldaeans to the Persians (538), and at the same time Amasis (Abmosi) II. of Egypt occupied Cyprus (Herod. ii. 182). There seems to have been no struggle; the great siege and the subsequent civil disorders had exhausted Tyre, and Sidon took its See also:place as the leading state. About this time, too, Carthage made an effort for independence under See also:Hanno the Great (53.8–521), the real founder of its fortunes; the old dependence upon Tyre was changed for a See also:mere relation of piety observed by the annual sending of delegates (Oewpoi) to the festival of Melkarth (See also:Arrian ii. 24; Polyb. xxxi. 20, 12). The disasters and humiliations which befell Tyre during this and the foregoing period might suggest that its prosperity had been seriously damaged. But Tyre always counted for more in commerce than in politics; and in the year 586, just before the great siege, Ezekiel draws a vivid picture (ch. xxvii.) of the extent and splendour of its commercial relations. Even when cut off from its possessions on the mainland the city itself was not captured; its seafaring trade went on; and though by degrees the colonies were lost, yet the ties of race and sentiment remained strong enough to bind the Phoenicians of the mother-country to their kindred beyond the seas. Constitution.—At this point it is convenient to mention what little is known about the constitution of the Phoenician states. All Canaanite See also:analogy speaks for kingship as the oldest form of Phoenician government. In the native inscriptions the chief of the city in Phoenicia itself and in Cyprus is always called king. The royal houses claimed divine descent,' and the king could not be chosen outside their members. His power, however, was limited by the wealthy merchant families, who possessed great influence in public affairs; thus it was possible for war or peace to be decided at Tyre in the king's See also:absence, or at Sidon against his will (Arrian ii. 15 and 16; See also:Curtius iv. 1, 15). The priest of Melkarth at Tyre was the second See also:man in the kingdom. Associated with the See also:prince was a See also:council of elders; such was the See also:case at Gebal (Byblus) from the earliest times to the latest (Ezek. xxvii. 9) ; at Sidon this council consisted of too members (Diod. xvi. 45), perhaps also at Tyre.' Inscriptions of the 3rd and 2nd centuries Inc. mention a Rab (chief) in Sidon, Cyprus and Gaulus (See also:Gozo); what his position was it is difficult to sa ; in the colonies he may have been a See also:district governor. During Nebuchadrezzar's time, as we have seen, a republic took the place of the monarchy at Tyre, and the government was administered by a See also:succession of suffetes (judges); they held See also:office for short terms, and in one instance two ruled together for six years. Much later, in the 3rd century B.c., an inscription from Tyre mentions a suffete (NSI. No. 8) without adding more to our knowledge. Carthage, of course, was governed by two suffetes, and these See also:officers are frequently named in connexion with the Carthaginian colonies (NSI. p. 115 seq.); but we must be careful not to draw the inference that Phoenicia itself had any such magistrates. Under the Persians a federal See also:bond was formed comprising Sidon, Tyre and Aradus, whose See also:duty it was to contribute 30o triremes to the Persian See also:fleet (Herod. vii. 89),
So the Babylonians, Canaanites (e.g. in the case of the Nephilirn, Gen. vi. 2), See also:Arabs, Greeks, traced the descent of heroic families to the gods. W. R. See also: 206; S. I. See also:Curtis's See also:Primitive Sem. Rel. To-See also:day (See also:London, 1902), p. 112 seq. ' An inscr. from Tyre may be read, 'Abd ba'al chief of the Hundred," NSI. p. 129; Clermont-Ganneau, Recueil d'See also:arch. or. H. 294 seq. the lesser towns being under,the command of the great cities. Aradus presided over three subordinate townships (Arrian ii. 13) ; Berytus, which had no king of its own, probably formed with Byblus a single kingdom; while Tripolis consisted of a federation of three cities separated by a See also:stadium from each other, and provided a See also:meeting-place for the federal council, which was chiefly occupied in dealings with the Persian government (Diod. xvi. 41). But federation on a larger See also:scale was never possible in Phoenicia, for the See also:reason that no sense of political unity existed to bind the different states together. Commercial interests dominated everything else, and while these stimulated a municipal See also:life not without vigour, civil discipline and See also:loyalty were but feebly See also:felt. On occasion the towns could defend their independence with strenuous courage; the higher qualities which make for a progressive See also:national life the Phoenicians did not possess. Phoenicia now became part of the fifth satrapy of the Persian Empire, and entered upon a spell of See also:comparative peace and The Persian growing prosperity. Favoured for the See also:sake of Period, 538- their fleet, and having common interests against 333 B. c. See also:Greece,' the Phoenicians were among the most loyal subjects of the empire. At this period Sidon occupied the position of leading state; in the fleet her king ranked next to See also:Xerxes and before the king of Tyre (Herod. viii. 67); her situation afforded advantages for expansion which Tyre on its small and densely populated island could not See also:rival. The city was distinguished by its See also:cosmopolitan character; the See also:satrap resided there when he came to Phoenicia, and the Persian monarch had his See also:paradise outside the walls. In the first See also:half of the 4th century Straton I. (in Phoen. 'Abd-'ashtart or Bod-'ashtart) was king, c. 374-362. He cultivated friendly relations with See also:Athens, indicated in a See also:decree of proxenia (See also:Michel, Rec. d'inscr. gr. No. 93 = CIG. No. 87); his See also:court was famed for its luxury; and the extent to which phil-Hellenic tendencies prevailed at this time in Sidon is shown by the royal sarcophagi, See also:noble specimens of Greek See also:art, which have been excavated in the See also:necropolis of the city. It was in the reign of Straton that Tyre fell into the hands of See also:Evagoras, king of See also:Salamis, who had already supplanted Phoenician with Greek civilization in Cyprus (Isocr. Evag. 62, Paneg. 161; Diod. xv. 2). Straton made See also:friends with Nicocles, son of Evagoras, and with him came to an untimely end through their implication in the great revolt of the satraps, 362 B.C. (see the See also:story of Straton's death in See also:Jerome, adv. Jovin. i. 45). A new revolt of Sidon against the Persians took place under King Tennes owing to the insults offered to the Sidonians at the federal See also:diet in Tripolis. With the aid of Nectanebus of Egypt, who had grievances of his own to avenge, the Sidonians carried the See also:rest of Phoenicia with them and drove the satraps of Syria and See also:Cilicia out of the country. Tennes, however, betrayed his people and opened the city to See also:Artaxerxes III.; the inhabitants to the number of 40,000 are said to have set See also:fire to their houses and perished; Tennes himself was executed after he had served the ends of the great king (346 B.C.; Diod. xvi. 41-45). The last king of Sidon was Straton II. ('Abd-'ashtart, 346-332) before the Persian Empire came to an end? Towards the close of the 5th century the Phoenician coins begin to supplement our See also:historical See also:sources (see See also:NUMISMATICS). From the time of See also:Darius the Persian monarchs issued a gold coinage, and reserved to themselves the right of doing so; but they allowed their satraps and vassal states to See also:coin See also:silver and See also:copper See also:money at discretion. Hence Aradus, Byblus, Sidon and Tyre issued a coinage of their own, of which many specimens exist: the coins are stamped as a rule with See also:emblem or name of the city, sometimes with the name of the ruler.' Thus from the coins of Byblus we learn the names of four kings, 'El-pa'al, 'Az-ba'al (between 36o and 340 B.C.) Adar-melek, 'See also:Ain-el; from the coins of the other cities it is difficult ' The See also:naval expeditions against Greece in 480-449 and See also:Sparta in 396-387 were mainly fitted out by Phoenicia. See See also:PERSIA: Ancient History, for the whole of this See also:section. s Justin xviii. 3 tells a story about Tyre during this period: the city, after being worn out though not defeated in long See also:wars with the Persians, was so enfeebled that it was seized by the slaves, who rose and massacred their masters; one Straton alone escaped and was afterwards made king. The reference to the Persians is obviously incorrect; the story, if it can be taken seriously at all, must refer to one of the sieges by the Assyrians or Chaldaeans, and, as Meyer suggests (Ency. Bib. col. 3760), may be derived from the story of Abdalonymus of Sidon mentioned below. 3 See especially E. Babelon, See also:Les Perses Achemenides, and cf. NSI. No. 149.to obtain much information. The native inscriptions, however, now become available, though most of them belong to the period which follows, and only a few have been discovered in Phoenicia itself. One of the earliest of these is the inscription of Byblus (CIS. i. 1=NSI. No. 3), dating from the Persian period; it records a See also:dedication made by Yebaw-See also:milk, king of Gebal, and mentions the name of the king's grandfather, See also:Uri-milk, but the exact dates of their reign are not given.
When See also: It is not unlikely that Zech. ix. 2-4 refers to this famous siege. For the time Tyre lost its political existence, while the foundation of See also:Alexandria presently changed the lines of trade, and dealt a See also:blow even more fatal to the Phoenician cities. During the wars of Alexander's successors Phoenicia changed hands several times between the Egyptian and the Syrian kings. Thus in 312 Tyre was captured from Antigonus by See also:Ptolemy I., the ally of Seleucus; in 287 it passed into the dominion of Seleucus; in 275 again it was captured by Ptolemy II. Philadelphus, and began to recover itself as an autonomous See also:municipality. From the year 275 " the people of Tyre " reckoned their era (CIS. i. 7=NSI. No. 9, cf. 1o). The Tyrian coins of the period, stamped with native, Greek and Egyptian symbols, illustrate the traditional relations of the city and the range of her ambitions. A special See also:interest attaches to these silver tetradrachms and didrachms (staters and half-staters), because they were used by the See also:Jews for the See also:payment of the temple tax as " shekels of the sanctuary " (NSI. pp. 351, 44)• Among the Phoenician states we know most about Sidon during this period. The kingship was continued for a long time. The story goes that Alexander raised to the See also:throne a member of the royal family, Abdalonymus, who was living in obscure poverty and working as a gardener (Justin xi. 1o; Curt. iv. 1; Diod. xvii. 47 wrongly connecting the story with Tyre). In 312 Ptolemy, then See also:master of Phoenicia, appointed his general Philocles king of the Sidonians, and a decree in See also:honour of this king has been found at Athens (Michel, No. 387, cf. 1261); but he cannot have reigned long. For at the end of the 4th and the beginning of the 3rd century we have evidence of a native dynasty in the important inscriptions of Tabnith, Eshmun-'azar and Bod-'ashtart, and in the See also:series of inscriptions (repeating the same See also:text) discovered at Bostan esh-Shekh near Sidon (NSI. Nos. 4, 5, 6 and App. i.)' The last-named texts imply that the first king of this dynasty was Eshmun-'azar; his son Tabnith succeeded him; then came Eshmun-'azar II., who died See also:young, then Bod-'ashtart, both of them grandsons of Eshmun-'azar I. With Bod-'ashtart, so far as we know, the dynasty came to an end, say about 250 B.C.; and it is not unlikely that the Sidonians reckoned an era of independence from this event (NSI. p. 95 n.). Of the other Phoenician cities something is known of the history of Aradus. Its era began in 259 B.C., when it probably became a republic or See also:free city. While the rest of Phoenicia passed under the The date of this dynasty has been much disputed ; but the reference to " the See also:lord of kings " in the great inscr. of Eshmun-'azar (line 18) points to the Ptolemaic period, for the Persian monarch is always styled " king of kings." The interpretation of many details of the inscr. from Bostan esh-Shekh is still uncertain. rule of Ptolemy II. and his successors between 281 and 197, Aradus remained in the kingdom of the Seleucids, who greatly favoured the city and increased its privileges (See also:Strabo xvi. 2, 14; Polyb. v. 68). But its subject-towns availed themselves of the political changes of the period to throw off their allegiance; Marathus from 278 begins to issue a coinage bearing the heads of the See also:Ptolemies, and later on Karne asserted its independence in the same way; but in the end the Aradians recovered their supremacy. Diodorus records a barbarous attempt made by the Aradians, about 148 B.C. to destroy Marathus, which was frustrated by the pity and courage of an Aradian See also:fisher-man (xxxiii. 5). At last in the time of See also:Tigranes, the Armenian holder of the kingdom of the Seleucids, or soon afterwards, the coins of Marathus cease; the city was levelled to the ground, and its land, with that of Simyra, was parcelled out among the Aradians (Strabo xvi. 2, 12). Akko issued coins of its own down to 267 B.C., if the reckoning was from the Seleucid era (312 B.c.); in 267 it was converted into a Greek city by Ptolemy, and called Ptolemais (Polyb. iv. 37; Strabo xvi. 2, 25; cf. Acts xxi. 7). Laodicea of Libanus was founded by Seleucus Nicator on the See also:plain south-east of Hemesa (Homg) in the region of the upper See also:Orontes, and became an important city; its coins of the 2nd century B.C. bear the interesting legend in Phoenician, " Of Laodicea which is in Canaan " (NSI. p. 349 seq.). Another Laodicea " by the sea " (ad See also:mare), also of Seleucid foundation, is probably to be identified with the ruined site called Umm el-'Aw-amid, near the coast between Tyre and Akko; several Phoenician inscriptions have been found there (e.g. CIS., i. 7=NSI. No. 9; Clermont Ganneau, Recueil, t. v.). After the death of Antiochus IV. Epiphanes in 164 B.c., revolts and adventurers made their See also:appearance in many parts of Syria, heralding the collapse of the kingdom of the Seleucids. Berytus was destroyed by the usurper Trypho in 140 B.C. Tyre in 120 and Sidon in 111 received See also:complete independence, and inaugurated new eras from these dates. Byblus and Tripolis fell into the hands of " tyrants " (Strabo xvi. 2, 18; Jos. Ant. xiv. 3, 2), and Arab robbers plundered their territories from strongholds in the Lebanon. From 83-69 B.C. the entire kingdom was held by the Armenian Tigranes. At last in 64 B.C. See also:Pompey arrived upon the See also:scene and established order out of See also:chaos. Phoenicia was incorporated into the See also:Roman See also:province of Syria; Aradus, Sidon, Tyre and Tripolis were confirmed in their rights of self-government and in the possession of their territories. In 14 B.C. See also:Augustus rebuilt Berytus as a Roman colony and stationed two legions there; later On Ptolemais, Tyre and Sidon received colonial status. Under the beneficent government of See also:Rome the chief towns prospered and extended their trade; but the whole character of the country underwent a change. During the Macedonian period Greek influences had been steadily gaining ground in Phoenicia; relations with the Greek world See also:grew closer; the native language fell into disuse, and from the beginning of the Roman occupation Greek appears regularly in inscriptions and on coins, though on the latter Phoenician legends do not entirely vanish till the 2nd century A.D.; while the extent to which Hellenic ideas penetrated the native traditions and mythologies is seen in the writings of Philo of Byblus. For the purposes of everyday life, however, the people spoke not Greek, but Aramaic. As elsewhere, the Roman rule tended to obliterate characteristic features of national life, and under it the native language and institutions of Phoenicia became See also:extinct. See also:Navigation, Trade, Colonies.—The Phoenicians were essentially a seafaring nation. Fearless and patient navigators, they ventured into regions where no one else dared to go, and, always with an See also:eye to their See also:monopoly, they carefully guarded the secrets of their trade routes and discoveries, and their knowledge of winds and currents. At the beginning of the 7th century B.C. a Phoenician fleet is said to have circumnavigated Africa (Herod. iv. 42). To the great See also:powers Phoenician ships and sailors were indispensable; Sennacherib, See also:Psammetichus and Necho, Xerxes, Alexander, all in turn employed them for their transports and sea-fights. Even when Athens had developed a rival See also:navy Greek observers noted with admiration the discipline kept on See also:board the Phoenician ships and the skill with which they were handled (Xen. Oec. viii., ; all the Phoenician vessels from the See also:round merchant-See also:boat (yaDXos—after which the island of Gaulus, now Gozo, near See also:Malta was called) to the great Tarshish-ships, the " East-Indiamen " of the ancient world, excelled those of the Greeks in See also:speed and equipment. As E. Meyer points out,'the war between the Greeks and the Persians was mainly a contest between the sea-powers of Greece and Phoenicia. At what period did Phoenicia first rise to be a power in the Mediterranean? We are gradually approaching a See also:solution of this obscure problem. See also:Recent discoveries in See also:Crete (q.v.) have brought to See also:light the existence of a Cretan or " Minoan " sea-power of remote antiquity, and it is clear that a great deal of what used to be described as Phoenician must receive quite a different designation. The Minoan sea-power was at last broken up by invaders from the north, and a Carian rule became dominant in the Aegean (Herod. i. 171; Thucyd. i. 4, 8). It was a time of disorder and conflict due to the See also:immigration of new races into the ancient seats of civilization, and it synchronized with the weakening of the power of Egypt in the countries which bordered on the eastern Mediterranean. This was in the 12th century B.C. The Tyrian trader saw that his opportunity was come, and the Aegean lay open to his merchant vessels. Where much is still obscure, all that seems certain is that the antiquity of Phoenicia as a sea and trading power has been greatly exaggerated both in ancient and in modern times; the Minoan power of See also:Cnossus preceded it by many centuries; the influence of Phoenicia in the Aegean cannot be carried back much earlier than the 12th century B.C., and, comparatively speaking, it was " See also:foreign, late, sporadic."' A vivid description of the Phoenicians' trade at the time of Tyre's prosperity is given by Ezekiel (xxvii. 12-25), and it shows how extensive were their commercial relations not only by sea, but by land as well. It was they who distributed to the rest of the world the wares of Egypt and Babylonia (Herod. i. I). From the lands of the Euphrates and See also:Tigris See also:regular trade-routes led to the Mediterranean with trading-stations on the way, several of which are mentioned by Ezekiel (xxvii. 23). In Egypt the Phoenician merchants soon gained a foothold; they alone were able to maintain a profitable trade in the anarchic times of the XXIInd and XXIIIrd Dynasties (825-650 B.C.), when all other foreign merchants were frightened away. Though there were never any regular colonies of Phoenicians in Egypt, the Tyrians had a See also:quarter of their own in See also:Memphis (Herod. ii. 112). The Arabian caravan-trade in perfume, spices and See also:incense passed through Phoenician hands on its way to Greece and the West (Herod. iii. 107); these articles of commerce were mainly produced not in Arabia, but in East Africa and See also:India, and the trade had its centre in the wealthy state of Sheba in See also:Yemen. Between Israel and Phoenicia the relations naturally were close; the former provided certain necessaries of life, and received in exchange articles of luxury and splendour (Ezek. xxvii. 16-18)2 Israelite housewives sold their homespun to Phoenician pedlars (Prov. xxxi. 24 R.V.M.); in Jerusalem Phoenician merchants and money-lenders had their quarter (Zeph. i. II), and after the Return we hear of Tyrians selling fish and all manner of See also:ware in the city (Neh. xiii. 16), and introducing other less desirable imports, such as foreign cults (Isa. lxv. II). The Phoenician words which made their way into Greek at an early period indicate the See also:kind of goods in which the Phoenicians traded with the West, or made See also:familiar through their commerce; the following are some of them–Xpvv6c, X1rWV, 06vQos, 66'ov17, µdppa, v6,(3Xa, u6lrpoc, ~vvKo!, µva, aaXAaKic, f3atr6Xos. Another valuable See also:article of commerce which the Phoenicians brought into the See also:market was amber. They can hardly have fetched it themselves from the Baltic or the North Sea; it came to them by two well-marked routes, one from the Baltic to the Adriatic, the other up the See also:Rhine and down the See also:Rhone. A See also:deposit of amber has also been found in the Lebanon, and perhaps the Phoenicians worked this and concealed its origin. 1 Burrows, Discoveries in Crete (1907), 140 sqq. It may be noted that the traditional or conjectural dates based upon the list of the Thalassocracies preserved by Eusebius carry us back to the 12th century B.C. See See also:Professor John L. Myres's See also:essay referred to above, § iii. (4). 2 See Eupolemus (140–1oo B.c.) quoted by Alexander Polyhistor, who, in a supposed See also:letter from Solomon to the king of Tyre, mentions the See also:food-supplies required by the Tyrians and promised from Palestine (Fr. Hist. Gr. iii. 226). Roman rule. In the days of Tyre's greatness her power rested directly on the colonies, which, unlike those of Greece, remained subject to the mother-city, and paid See also:tithes of their revenues to its chief See also:god, Melqarth, and sent envoys annually to his feast. Then at the beginning of the 8th century B.C. the colonial power of Tyre began to decline; on the mainland and in Cyprus the Assyrians gained the upper See also:hand; in the Greek islands the Phoenicians had already been displaced to a great extent by the advancing See also:tide of Dorian colonization. But as Tyre decayed in power the colonies turned more and more to Carthage as their natural See also:parent and See also:protector. For effective See also:control over a colonial empire Carthage had the See also:advantage of situation over far-away Tyre; the traditional bonds grew lax and the ancient dues ceased to be paid, though as late as the See also:middle of the 6th century Carthage rendered tithes to the Tyrian Melqarth. And the mother-country cherished its claims long after they had lost reality; in the and century B.C., for example, Sidon stamped her coins with the legend, Mother of Kambe (i.e. Carthage), See also:Hippo, Kition, Tyre " The Phoenician colonies were all supposed to have been founded from Tyre: with regard to the colonies in Cyprus and north Africa this was undoubtedly true. Cyprus possessed resources of timber and copper which could not fail to tempt the keen-eyed traders across the water, who made Citium (from Kittim, the name of the original non-Semitic inhabitants) their chief See also:settlement, and thence established themselves in Idalium, Tamassus, Lapethus, Larnaka, Qarth-hadasht (Karti-hadasti) and other towns. In the inscriptions of the 4th to 3rd centuries, the Phoenician potentates in the island See also:call themselves " kings of Kition and Idalion " (NSI. pp. 55-89). But the Phoenician rule was not so ancient as used to be supposed. At an early period Greeks from the south coast of Asia Minor had settled in Cyprus before the Phoenicians founded any colonies there; and it is noticeable that in the Assyrian tribute-lists of the latter half of the 7th century (KB. ii. pp. 149, 241) not one of the ten Cyprian kings mentioned appears to be Phoenician by name. Menander states (Jos. Ant. ix. 14, 2) that the kings of Tyre ruled over Cyprus at the close of the 8th century; but a clear See also:proof that the Phoenician rule was neither ancient nor uninterrupted is given by the fact that the Cyprian Greeks took the trouble to invent a Greek See also:cuneiform character (Cypriote) modelled on the Assyrian. Homer represents the Phoenicians as present in Greek See also:waters for purposes of See also:traffic, but not as settlers (Il. xxiii. 744). They occupied trading-stations on some of the Aegean islands and on the See also:Isthmus of See also:Corinth. One of their See also:objects was the collection of murex, of which an enormous supply was needed for the See also:dyeing See also:industry; specially famous was the purple of the Laconian waters, the isles of Elishah of Ezek. xxvii. 7. But a great deal of what was formerly assigned to Phoenician influence in the Aegean at an early period—pottery, ornaments and local myths —must be accounted for by the vigorous civilization of ancient Crete. In the Greek world the Phoenicians made themselves heartily detested; their characteristic See also:passion for gain (rd Ot.Xoxpilµarov, See also:Plato, See also:Rep. iv. 435 E.) was not likely to ingratiate them with those who were compelled to make use of their services while they suffered from their greed. Farther west in the Mediterranean Phoenician settlements were planted first in See also:Sicily, on the south coast, at See also:Heraclea or Ras Melqarth; the islands between Sicily and Africa, Melita (Malta) on account of its valuable harbour, Gaulus and Cossura were also occupied (Diod. v. 12); and a beginning was made with the colonization of See also:Sardinia and See also:Corsica; but farther west still, and on the See also:Atlantic coasts to the right and left of the straits, more permanent colonies were established. It was the trade with Tarshish, i.e. the region of Tartessus in south-west See also:Spain, which contributed most to the Phoenicians' See also:wealth; for in this region they owned not only profitable See also:fisheries, but rich mines of silver and other metals. The profits of the trade were enormous; it was said that even the anchors of ships returning from Spain were made of silver (Diod. v. 35).• From Gadeira (Punic Gader, Lat. Gades, now See also:Cadiz), the town which they built on an island near the mouth of the Guadalquiver, the Sidonian ships ventured farther on the ocean and See also:drew See also:tin from the mines of north-west Spain or from the richer deposits in the See also:Cassiterides, i.e. the Tin Islands. These were discovered to be, not a part of See also:Britain as was imagined at first, but a See also:separate group by them-selves, now known as the Scillies; hence it is improbable that the Phoenicians ever worked the tin-mines in See also:Cornwall. The rich trade with Spain led to the colonization of the West. Strabo dates the settlements beyond the Pillars of See also:Hercules soon after the Trojan War (i. 3, 2), in the period of Tyre's first expansion. Lixus in See also:Mauretania, Gades and Utica, are said to have been founded, one after the other, as far back as the 12th century B.C. Most of the See also:African colonies were no doubt younger; we have traditional dates for Aoza (887–855) and Carthage (813). A large part of North-west Africa was colonized from Phoenicia; owing to these first settlers, and after them to the Carthaginians, the Phoenician language became the prevailing one, just as Latin and Arabic did in later times, and the country assumed quite a Phoenician character. Additional information and CommentsThere are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click, and select "copy." Then paste it into your website, email, or other HTML. Site content, images, and layout Copyright © 2006 - Net Industries, worldwide. |
|
[back] PHOEBUS (Gr. for " bright," " pure,") |
[next] PHOENIX |