Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
See also:FINE ARTS , the name given to a whole See also:group of human activities, which have for their result what is collectively known as Fine See also:Art. The arts which constitute the group are the five greater arts of See also:architecture, See also:sculpture, See also:painting, See also:music and See also:poetry, with a number of See also:minor or subsidiary arts, of which dancing and the See also:drama are among the most See also:ancient and universal. In antiquity the fine arts were not explicitly named, nor even distinctly recognized, as a See also:separate class. In other See also:modern See also:languages besides See also:English they are called by the See also:equivalent name of the beautiful arts (belle arti, See also:beaux arts, schone Kunste). The fine or beautiful arts then, it is usually said, are those among the arts of See also:man which See also:minister, not primarily to his material necessities or conveniences, but to his love of beauty; and if any art fulfils both these purposes at once, still as fulfilling the latter only is it called a fine art. Thus architecture, in so far as it provides shelter and See also:accommodation, is one of the useful or See also:mechanical arts, and one of the fine arts only in so far as its structures impress or give See also:pleasure by the aspect of strength, fitness, See also:harmony and proportion of parts, by disposition and contrast of See also:light and shade, by See also:colour and enrichment, by variety and relation of contours, surfaces and intervals. But this, the commonly accepted See also:account of the See also:matter, does not really See also:cover the ground. The See also:idea conveyed by the words " love of beauty," even stretched to its widest, can hardly be made to include the love of See also:caricature and the See also:grotesque; and these are admittedly modes of fine art. Even the terrible, the painful, the squalid, the degraded, in a word every variety of the significant, can be so handled and interpreted as to be brought within the See also:province of fine art. A juster and more inclusive, although clumsier, account of the matter might put it that the fine arts are those among the arts of man which See also:spring from his impulse to do or make certain things in certain ways for the See also:sake, first, of a See also:special See also:kind of pleasure, See also:independent of See also:direct utility, which it gives him so to do or make them, and next for the sake of the kindred pleasure which he derives from witnessing or contemplating them when they arc so done or made by others. there are freedom and beauty, we put down the See also:charm of these with See also:good See also:reason to inherited and inbred aptitudes of which the See also:person has never thought or See also:long since ceased to think, and could not still be thinking without spoiling the charm by self- consciousness; and we See also:call the result a See also:gift of nature. But and on grounds of the most careful study of See also:evidence, has when we go on to See also:notice that the same person is beautifully been Dr YrjS Hirn of See also:Helsingfors.) Whatever relative parts the and appropriately dressed, since we know that it is impossible " individual and the social impulses may have in fact played at to See also:dress without thinking of it, we put down the charm of this the outset, it is clear that what any one can enjoy or admire by to judicious forethought and calculation and call the result a I himself, whether in the way of See also:mimicry, of rhythmical movements See also:work of art. or utterances, of imitative or ornamental See also:carving and See also:drawing, The processes then of fine art, like those of all arts properly of the disposition and adornment of dwelling-places and utensils so called, are premeditated, and the See also:property of every fine art —the same things, it is clear, others are able also to enjoy or The active is to give to the person exercising it a special kind of admire with him. And so, with the growth of See also:societies, it came and the active pleasure, and a special kind of passive or about that one class of persons separated themselves and became passive receptive pleasure to the person witnessing the results the ministers or producers of this kind of pleasures, while the See also:rest pleasures of such exercise. This latter statement seems to imply became the persons ministered to, the participators in or recipiof fine art. that there exist in human societies a separate class ents of the pleasures. Artists are those members of a society producing See also:works of fine art and another class enjoying them. who are so constituted as to feel more acutely than the rest Such an implication, in regard to advanced societies, is near certain classes of pleasures which all can feel in their degree. enough the truth to be theoretically admitted (like the analogous By this fact of their constitution they are impelled to devote See also:assumption in See also:political See also:economy that there exist separate their active See also:powers to the See also:production of such pleasures, to the classes of producers and consumers). In See also:developed communities making or doing of some of those things which they enjoy so the gifts and calling of the artist constitute in fact a separate keenly when they are made and done by others. At the same profession of the creators or purveyors of fine art, while the rest See also:time the artist does not, by assuming these ministering or of the community are its enjoyers or recipients. In the most ! creative functions, surrender his enjoying or receptive functions. See also:primitive societies, apparently, this cannot have been so, and we He continues to participate in the pleasures of which he is can go back to an See also:original or rudimentary See also:stage of almost every himself the cause, and remains a conscious member of his own fine art at which the separation between a class of producers public. The architect, sculptor, painter, are able respectively accordingly, means every regulated operation or dexterity where-by we pursue ends which we know beforehand; and it means nothing but such operations and dexterities. What is true of art generally is of course also true of the special group of the fine arts, One of the essential qualities of all art is premeditation; and when See also:Shelley talks of the skylark's profuse strains of " unpremeditated art," he in effect See also:lays emphasis on the fact that it is only by a See also:metaphor that he uses the word art in clapped hands and stamped or shouted in time, in See also:honour of his this See also:case at all; he calls See also:attention to that which (if the songs o See also:god, in See also:commemoration of a victory, or in See also:mere obedience to the birds are as instinctive as we suppose) precisely makes the , See also:blind stirring of a rhythmic impulse within him. To some very difference between the skylark's outpourings and his own. We are remote and solitary ancestral See also:savage the presence or See also:absence slow to allow the See also:title of fine art to natural eloquence, to charm of witnesses at such a display may in like manner have been or dignity of manner, to delicacy and tact in social intercourse, indifferent; but very See also:early in the See also:history of the See also:race the primitive and other such See also:graces of See also:life and conduct, since, although in any dancer and See also:singer joined hands and voices with others of his given case they may have been deliberately cultivated in early tribe, while others again sat apart and looked on at the perform-life, or even through ancestral generations, they do not produce ance, and the rite thus became both choral and social. A primitive type of the instrumental musician is the shepherd who first notched a See also:reed and See also:drew sounds from it while his See also:sheep sophic See also:scheme See also:lead some writers on See also:aesthetics to include such were cropping. The See also:father of all artists in dress and See also:personal acts or traits of beautiful and expressive behaviour among I adornment was the first See also:wild man who tattooed himself or be-the deliberate See also:artistic activities of mankind, we feel that an decked himself with shells and plumes. In both of these latter essential distinction is being sacrificed to the exigencies of a instances, it may be taken as certain, the primitive artist had the See also:system. That distinction See also:common parlance very justly observes, See also:motive of pleasing not himself only, but his See also:mate, or the See also:female with its opposition of " art " to " nature " and its phrase of whom he desired to be his mate, and in the last instance of all "second nature " for those graces which have become so habitual the further motive of impressing his See also:fellow-tribesmen and Striking as to seem instinctive, whether originally the result of discipline I See also:awe or envy into his enemies. The tendency of See also:recent specula-or not. When we see a person in all whose See also:ordinary movements tion and See also:research concerning the origins of art has been to ascribe the primitive artistic activities of man less and less to individual and solitary impulse, and more and more to social impulse and the See also:desire of sharing and communicating pleasure. (The writer who has gone furthest in developing this view, their full effect until they are so ingrained as to have become unreflecting and spontaneous. When the exigencies of a See also:philo- The nature of this impulse, and the several grounds of these pleasures, are subjects which have given rise to a formidable See also:body of See also:speculation and discussion, the See also:chief phases of which will be found summarized under the heading AESTHETICS. In the See also:present See also:article we have only to attend to the See also:concrete processes and results of the artistic activities of man; in other words, we shall submit (r) a See also:definition of fine art in See also:general, (2) a definition and See also:classification of the See also:principal fine arts severally, (3) some observations on their See also:historical development. I. Of Fine Art in General. According to the popular and established distinction between art and nature, the idea of Art (q.v.) only includes phenomena Premedi- of which man is deliberately the cause; while the ration idea of Nature includes all phenomena, both in man essential and in the See also:world outside him, which take See also:place without to art. forethought or studied initiative of his own. Art, or performers and a class of recipients hardly exists. Such an original or rudimentary stage of the dramatic art is presented by See also:children, who will occupy themselves for ever with mimicry and make-believe for their own See also:satisfaction, with small regard or none to the presence or absence of witnesses. The original or rudimentary type of the profession of imitative sculptors or painters is the See also:cave-dweller of prehistoric ages, who, when he rested from his See also:day's See also:hunting, first took up the See also:bone handle of his weapon, and with a See also:flint either carved it into the shape, or on its See also:surface scratched the outlines, of the animals of the See also:chase. The original or rudimentary type of the architect, considered not as a mere builder but as an artist, is the savage who, when his tribe had taken to live in tents or huts instead of caves, first arranged the skins and timbers of his See also:tent or hut in one way because it pleased his See also:eye, rather than in some other way which was as good for shelter. The original type of the artificer or adorner of implements, considered in the same light, was the other savage who first took it into his See also:head to See also:fashion his See also:club or See also:spear in one way rather than another for the pleasure of the eye only and not for any See also:practical reason, and to See also:ornament it with tufts or markings. In none of these cases, it would seem, can the primitive artist have had much reason for pleasing anybody but himself. Again, the original or rudimentary type of lyric See also:song and dancing arose when the first reveller to stand off from and appreciate the results of their own labours; the singer enjoys the See also:sound of his own See also:voice, and the musician of his own See also:instrument; the poet, according to his temperament, furnishes the most enthusiastic or the most fastidious reader for his own stanzas. Neither, on the other See also:hand, does the person who is a habitual recipient from others of the pleasures of fine art forfeit the See also:privilege of producing them according to his capabilities, and of becoming, if he has the See also:power, an See also:amateur or occasional artist. Most of the common properties which have been recognized by consent as See also:peculiar to the group of fine arts will be found on Pleasures examination to be implied in, or deducible from, otfineart the one fundamental See also:character generally claimed for dls- them, namely, that they exist independently of direct Interested. practical See also:necessity or utility. Let us take, first, a point See also:relating to the See also:frame of mind of the recipient, as distinguished from the producer, of the pleasures of fine art. It is an observation as old as See also:Aristotle that such pleasures differ from most other pleasures of experience in that they are disinterested, in the sense that they are not such as nourish a man's body nor add to his riches; they are not such as can gratify him, when he receives them, by the sense of See also:advantage or superiority over his fellow-creatures; they are not such as one human being can in any sense receive exclusively from the See also:object which bestows them. Thus it is evidently characteristic of a beautiful See also:building that its beauty cannot be monopolized, but can be seen and admired by the inhabitants of a whole See also:city and by all visitors for all generations. The same thing is true of a picture or a statue, except in so far as an individual possessor may choose to keep such a See also:possession to himself, in which case his See also:pride in exclusive ownership is a sentiment wholly independent of his pleasure in artistic contemplation. Similarly, music is composed to be sung or played for the enjoyment of many at a time, and for such enjoyment a See also:hundred years hence as much as to-day. Poetry is written to be read by all readers for ever who care for the ideas and feelings of the poet, and can apprehend the meaning and See also:melody of his See also:language. Hence, though we can speak of a class of the producers of fine art, we cannot speak of a class of its consumers, only of its recipients or enjoyers. If we consider other pleasures which might seem to be analogous to those of fine art, but to which common consent yet declines to allow that character, we shall see that one reason is that such pleasures are not in their nature thus disinterested. Thus the sense of See also:smell and See also:taste have pleasures of their own like the senses of sight and See also:hearing, and pleasures neither less poignant nor very much less capable of fine See also:graduation and discrimination than those. Why, then, is the title of fine art not claimed for any skill in arranging and combining them? Why are there no recognized arts of savours and scents corresponding in See also:rank to the arts of forms, See also:colours and sounds—or at least none among Western nations, for in See also:Japan, it seems, there is a recognized and finely regulated social art of the See also:combination and See also:succession of perfumes? An See also:answer commonly given is that sight and hearing are intellectual and therefore higher senses, that through them we have our avenues to all knowledge and all ideas of things outside us; while taste and smell are unintellectual and therefore See also:lower senses, through which few such impressions find their way to us as help to build up our knowledge and our ideas. Perhaps a more satisfactory reason why there are no fine arts of taste and smell—or let us in deference to See also:Japanese modes leave out smell, and say of taste only—is this, that savours yield only private pleasures, which it is not possible to build up into separate and durable schemes such that every one may have the benefit of them, and such as cannot be monopolized or used up. If against this it is contended that what the See also:programme of a performance is in the musical art, the same is a menu in the culinary, and that practically it is no less possible to serve up a thousand times and to a thousand different companies the same See also:dinner than the same See also:symphony, we must fall back upon that still more fundamental See also:form of the distinction between the aesthetic and non-aesthetic bodily senses, upon which the physiological psychologists of the English school laystress. We must say that the pleasures of taste cannot be pleasures of fine art, because their enjoyment is too closely associated with the most indispensable and the most strictly personal of utilities, eating and drinking. To pass from these lower pleasures to the highest; consider the nature of the delight derived from the contemplation, by the person who is their object, of the signs and manifestations of love. That at least is a beautiful experience; why is the pleasure which it affords not an artistic pleasure either? Why, in See also:order to receive an artistic pleasure from human signs and manifestations of this kind, are we compelled to go to the See also:theatre and see them exhibited in favour of a third person who is not really their object any more than ourselves? This is so, for one reason, evidently, because of the difference between art and nature. Not to art, but to nature and life, belongs love where it is really See also:felt, with its attendant See also:train of vivid hopes, fears, passions and contingencies. To art belongs love displayed where it is not really felt; and in this See also:sphere, along with reality and spontaneousness of the display, and along with its momentous See also:bearings, there disappear all those elements of pleasure in its contemplation which are not disinterested—the elements of personal exultation and self-congratulation, the pride of exclusive possession or See also:acceptance, all these emotions, in See also:short, which are summed up in the See also:lover's triumphant monosyllable, " Mine." Thus, from the lowest point of the See also:scale to the highest, we may observe that the See also:element of personal advantage or See also:monopoly in human gratifications seems to exclude• them from the See also:kingdom of fine art. The pleasures of fine art, so far as concerns their passive or receptive See also:part, seem to define themselves as pleasures of gratified contemplation, but of such contemplation only when it is disinterested—which is simply another way of saying, when it is unconcerned with ideas of utility. Modern speculation has tended in some degree to modify and obscure this old and established view of the pleasures of fine art by urging that the hearer or spectator is not after An all so See also:free from self-See also:interest as he seems; that in the objection See also:act of artistic contemplation he experiences an enhance- and its ment or expansion of his being which is in truth a answer., gain of the egoistic kind; that in witnessing a See also:play, for ihstance, a large part of his enjoyment consists in sympathetically identifying himself with the successful lover or the virtuous See also:hero. All this may be true, but does not really affect the See also:argument, since at the same time he is well aware that every other spectator or auditor present may be similarly engaged with himself. At most the objection only requires us to define a little more closely, and to say that the satisfactions of the ego excluded from among the pleasures of fine art are not these ideal, sympathetic, indirect satisfactions, which every one can See also:share together, but only those which arise from direct, private and incommunicable advantage to the individual. Next, let us consider another generally accepted observation concerning the nature of the fine arts, and one, this time, relating to the disposition and See also:state of mind of the practising artist himself. While for success in other arts it is only can Fjnearts not be necessary to learn their rules and to apply them until practised practice gives facility, in the fine arts, it is commonly by See also:rule and justly said, rules and their application will carry and but a little way towards success. All that can depend See also:precept. on rules, on knowledge, and on the application of knowledge by practice, the artist must indeed acquire, and the acquisition is often very complicated and laborious. But outside of and beyond such acquisitions he must See also:trust to what is called See also:genius or See also:imagination, that is, to the spontaneous working together of an incalculably complex group of faculties, reminiscences, preferences, emotions, instincts in his constitution. This characteristic of the activities of the artist is a direct consequence or corollary of the fundamental fact that the art he practices is independent of utility. A utilitarian end is necessarily a determinate and prescribed end, and to every end which is determinate and prescribed there must be one road which is the best. Skill in any useful art means knowing practically, by rules and the application of rules, the best road to the particular ends of that art. Thus the See also:farmer, the engineer, the See also:carpenter, the builder so far as he is not concerned with the look of his buildings, the See also:weaver so far as he is not concerned with the designing of the patterns which he weaves, possesses each his peculiar skill, but a skill to which fixed problems are set, and which, if it indulges in new inventions and combinations at all, can indulge them only for the sake of an improved See also:solution of those particular problems. The solution once found, the invention once made, its rules can be written down, or at any See also:rate its practice can be imparted to others who will apply it in their turn. Whereas no man can write down, in a way that others can act upon, how See also:Beethoven conquered unknown kingdoms in the world of harmony, or how See also:Rembrandt turned the aspects of gloom, squalor and affliction into pictures as worthy of contemplation as those into which the Italians before him had turned the aspects of spiritual exaltation and shadowless day. The reason why the operations of the artist thus differ from the operations of the ordinary craftsman or artificer is that his ends, being ends other than useful, are not determinate nor fixed as theirs are. He has large See also:liberty to choose his own problems, and may solve each of them in a thousand different ways according to the prompting of his own ordering or creating instincts. The musical composer has the largest liberty of all. Having learned what is learnable in his art, having mastered the complicated and laborious rules of musical form, having next deter-See also:mined the particular class of the work which he is about to compose, he has then before him the. whole inexhaustible world of appropriate successions and combinations of emotional sound. He is merely directed and not fettered, in the case of song, See also:cantata, See also:oratorio or See also:opera, by the sense of the words which he has to set. The value of the result depends absolutely on his possessing or failing to possess powers which can neither be trained in nor communicated to any man. And this See also:double freedom, alike from practical service and from the See also:representation of definite See also:objects, is what makes music in a certain sense the typical fine art, or art of arts. Architecture shares one-See also:half of this freedom. It has not to ccpy or represent natural objects; for this service it calls in sculpture to its aid; but architecture is without the other half of freedom altogether. The architect has a sphere of liberty in the disposition of his masses, lines, colours, alternations of light and See also:shadow, of See also:plain and ornamented surface, and the rest; but upon this sphere he can only enter on See also:condition that he at the same time fulfils the strict practical task of supplying the required accommodation, and obeys the strict mechanical necessities imposed by the See also:laws of See also:weight, thrust, support, resistance and other properties of solid matter. The sculptor again, the painter, the poet, has each in like manner his sphere of necessary facts, rules and conditions corresponding to the nature of his task. The sculptor must be intimately versed both in the surface aspects and the inner mechanism of the human frame alike in rest and See also:motion, and in the rules and conditions for its representation in solid form; the painter in a much more extended range of natural facts and appearances, and the rules and conditions for representing them on a See also:plane surface; the poet's art of words has its own not inconsiderable basis of See also:positive and disciplined acquisition. So far as rules, precepts, formulas and other communicable laws or secrets can carry the artist, so far also the spectator can account for, analyse, and, so to speak, tabulate the effects of his art. But the essential character of the artist's operation, its very See also:bloom and virtue, lies in those parts of it which fall outside this range of regulation on the one hand and See also:analysis on the other. His merit varies according to the felicity with which he is able, in that region, to exercise his free choice and frame his individual ideal, and according to the tenacity, with which he strives to grasp and realize his choice, or to attain perfection according to that ideal. In this connexion the question naturally arises, In what way do the progress and expansion of mechanical art affect the power and province of fine art? The See also:great practical See also:movement of the world in our See also:age is a movement for the development of mechanical inventions and multiplication of mechanical See also:pro-ducts. So far as these inventions are applied to purposes purely useful, and so far as their products to not profess to offer any-thing delightful to contemplation, this movement in no way concerns our argument. But there is a vast multitude of products which do profess qualities of pleasantness, and upon which the ornaments intended to make them pleasurable are bestowed by machinery; and in speaking of these we are accustomed to the phrases art-See also:industry, See also:industrial art, art manufactures and the like. In these cases the industry or ingenuity which directs the See also:machine is not fine art at all, since the object of the machine Is simply to multiply as easily and as perfectly as possible a definite and prescribed impress or See also:pattern. This is equally true whether the machine is a See also:simple one, like the engraver's See also:press, for producing and multiplying impressions from an engraved See also:plate, or a highly complex one, like the See also:loom, in which elaborate patterns of See also:carpet or See also:curtain are set for See also:weaving. In both cases there exists behind the mechanical industry an industry which is one of fine art in its degree. In the case of the engraver's press, there exists behind the industry of the printer the art of the engraver, which, if the engraver is also the free inventor of the See also:design, is then a fine art, or, if he is but the interpreter of the invention of another, is then in its turn a semi-mechanical skill applied in aid of the fine art of the first inventor. In the case of the weaver's loom there is, behind the mechanical industry which directs the loom at its given task, the fine art, or what ought to be the fine art, of the designer who has contrived the pattern. In the case of the See also:engraving, the mechanical industry of See also:printing only exists for the sake of bringing out and disseminating abroad the fine art employed upon the design. In.the case of the carpet or curtain, the fine art is often only called in to make the product of the useful or mechanical industry of the loom acceptable, since the eye of man is so constituted as to receive pleasure or the See also:reverse of pleasure from whatever it rests upon, and it is to the interest of the manufacturer to have his product so made as to give pleasure if it can. Whether the machine is thus a humble servant to the artist, or the artist a kind of humble purveyor to the machine, the fine art in the result is due to the former alone; and in any case it reaches the recipient at second-hand, having been put in circulation by a See also:medium not artistic but mechanical. Again, with reference not to the application of mechanical contrivances but to their invention; is not, it may be inquired, the title of artist due to the inventor of some of the perfected astonishingly complex and astonishingly efficient See also:machines: machines of modern times? Does he not spend as are they much thought, labour, genius as any sculptor or works of musician in perfecting his construction according to fine artP his ideal, and is not the construction when it is done—so finished, so responsive in all its parts, so almost human—is not that worthy to be called a work of fine art? The answer is that the inventor has a definite and practical end before him; his ideal is not free; he deserves all See also:credit as the perfector of a particular instrument for a prescribed See also:function, but an artist, a free follower of the fine arts, he is not; although we may perhaps have to concede him a narrow sphere for the play of something like an artistic sense when he contrives the proportion, arrangement, form or finish of the several parts of his machine in one way rather than another, not because they work better so but simply because their look pleases him better. Returning from this digression, let us consider one common observation more on the nature of the fine arts. They are activities, it is said, which were put forth not because See also:pine arts they need but because they like. They have the caueda activity to spare, and to put it forth in this way pleases kind of them. Fine art is to mankind what play is to the play' individual, a free and arbitrary vent for See also:energy which is not needed to be spent upon tasks concerned with the conservation, perpetuation or See also:protection of life. To insist on the superfluous or optional character of the fine arts, to call them the play or pastime of the human race as distinguished from its inevitable and sterner tasks, is obviously only to reiterate our fundamental Fine arts and machinery: " art manufactures." distinction between the fine arts and the useful or necessary. But the distinction, as expressed in this particular form, has been interpreted in a great variety of ways and followed out to an infinity of conclusions, conclusions regarding both the nature of the activities themselves and the character and value of their results. For instance, starting from this saying that the aesthetic activities are a kind of play, the English See also:psychology of association goes back to the spontaneous cries and movements The play of children, in which their superfluous energies find a idea as out vent. It then enumerates pleasures of which the by the human constitution is capable apart from direct English advantage or utility. Such are the primitive or assocla- tlonists. organic pleasures of sight and hearing, and the second- ary or derivative pleasures of association or unconscious See also:reminiscence and inference that soon become mixed up with these. Such are also the pleasures derived from following any kind of mimicry, or representation of things real or like reality. The association psychology describes the grouping within the mind of predilections based upon these pleasures; it shows how the growing organism learns to govern its play, or direct its superfluous energies, in obedience to such predilections, till in mature individuals, and still more in mature societies, a highly regulated and accomplished group of leisure activities are habitually employed in supplying to a not less highly cultivated group of disinterested sensibilities their appropriate artistic pleasures. It is by See also:Herbert See also:Spencer that this view has been most fully and systematically worked out. Again, in the views of an ancient philosopher, See also:Plato, and a modern poet, See also:Schiller, the See also:consideration that the artistic activities By Plato. are in the nature of play, and the manifestations in which they result independent of realities and utilities, has led to judgments so differing as the following. Plato held that the daily realities of things in experience are not realities, indeed, but only far-off shows or reflections of the true realities, that is, of certain ideal or essential forms which can be apprehended as existing by the mind. Holding this, Plato saw in the works of fine art but the reflections of reflections, the shows of shows, and depreciated them according to their degree of remoteness from the ideal, typical or sense-transcending existences. He sets the arts of See also:medicine, See also:agriculture, shoemaking and the rest above the fine arts, inasmuch as they produce something serious or useful (Qaoebaiov rt). Fine art, he says, produces nothing useful, and makes only semblances (eibwXoroiiKrt), whereas what mechanical art produces are utilities, and even in the ordinary sense realities (a11roiror7ruKi7). In another age, and thinking according to another system, Schiller, so far from holding thus cheap the kingdom of play and show, regarded his See also:sovereignty over that kingdom By as the noblest See also:prerogative of man. Schiller wrote his Schl/ler. famous Letters on the Aesthetic See also:Education of Man in order to throw into popular currency, and at the same time to modify and follow up in a particular direction, certain See also:meta-See also:physical doctrines which had lately been launched upon the See also:schools by See also:Kant. The spirit of man, said Schiller after Kant, is placed between two worlds, the physical world or world of sense, and the moral world or world of will. Both of these are worlds of constraint or necessity. In the sensible world, the spirit of man submits to constraint from without; in the moral world, it imposes constraint from within. So far as man yields to the importunities of sense, in so far he is See also:bound and passive, the subject of outward shocks and victim of irrational forces. So far as he asserts himself by the exercise of will, imposing upon sense and outward things the dominion of the moral See also:law within him, in so far he is free and active, the rational See also:lord of nature and not her slave. Corresponding to these two worlds, he has within him two conflicting impulses or impulsions of his nature, the one See also:driving him towards one way of living, the other towards another. The one, or sense-impulsion (Stofftrieb), Schiller thinks of as that which enslaves the spirit of man as the victim of matter, the other or moral impulsion (Formtrieb) as that which enthrones it as the See also:dictator of form. Between the twothe conflict at first seems inveterate. The kingdom of See also:brute nature and sense, the sphere of man's subjection and passivity, See also:wages See also:war against the kingdom of will and moral law, the sphere of his activity and See also:control, and every See also:conquest of the one is an encroachment upon the other. Is there, then, no See also:hope of truce between the two kingdoms, no ground where the two contending impulses can be reconciled? See also:Nay, the answer comes, there is such a hope; such a neutral territory there exists. Between the passive kingdom of matter and sense, where man is compelled blindly to feel and be, and the active kingdom of law and reason, where he is compelled sternly to will and act, there is a kingdom where both sense and will may have their way, and where man may give the See also:rein to all his powers. But this See also:middle kingdom does not See also:lie in the sphere of practical life and conduct. It lies in the sphere of those activities which neither subserve any necessity of nature nor fulfil any moral See also:duty. Towards activities of this kind we are driven by a third impulsion of our nature not less essential to it than the other two, the impulsion, as Schiller calls it, of Play (Spieltrieb). Relatively to real life and conduct, play is a kind of harmless show; it is that which we are free to do or leave undone as we please, and which lies alike outside the sphere of needs and duties. In play we may do as we like, and no See also:mischief will come of it. In this sphere man may put forth all his powers without See also:risk of conflict, and may invent activities which will give a See also:complete ideal satisfaction to the contending faculties of sense and will at once, to the impulses which bid him feel and enjoy the shocks of physical and outward things, and the impulse which bids him See also:master such things, control and regulate them. In play you may impose upon Matter what Form you choose, and the two will not interfere with one another or clash. The kingdom of Matter and the kingdom of Form thus harmonized, thus reconciled by the activities of play and show, will in other words be the kingdom of the Beautiful. Follow the impulsion of play, and to the beautiful you will find your road; the activities you will find yourself putting forth will be the activities of aesthetic creation—you will have discovered or invented the fine arts. " Midway "—these are Schiller's own words—" midway between the formidable kingdom' of natural forces and the hallowed kingdom of moral laws, the impulse of aesthetic creation builds up a third kingdom unperceived, the gladsome kingdom of play and show, wherein it emancipates man from all compulsion alike of physical and of moral forces." Schiller, the poet and enthusiast, thus making his own application of the Kantian See also:metaphysics, goes on to set forth how the fine arts, or activities of play and show, are for him the typical, the ideal activities of the race, since in them alone is it possible for man to put forth his whole, that is his ideal self. " Only when he plays is man really and truly man." " Man ought only to play with the beautiful, and he ought to play with the beautiful only." " Education in taste and beauty has for its object to train up in the utmost attainable harmony the whole sum of the powers both of sense and spirit." And the rest of Schiller's argument is addressed to show how the activities of artistic creation, once invented, react upon other departments of human life, how the exercise of the play impulse prepares men for an existence in which the inevitable collision of the two other impulses shall be softened or averted more and more. That harmony of the powers which clash so violently in man's primitive nature, having first been found possible in the sphere of the fine arts, reflects itself, in his See also:judgment, upon the whole See also:composition of man, and attunes him, as an aesthetic being, into new capabilities for the conduct of his social existence. Our reasons for dwelling on this wide and enthusiastic See also:formula of Schiller's are both its importance in the history of reflection—it remained, indeed, for nearly a See also:century a formula The almost classical—and the measure of positive value strong which it still retains. The notion of a sphere of points of voluntary activity for the human spirit, in which, Schluer's under no compulsion of necessity or See also:conscience, we theory. order matters as we like them apart from any practical end, seems coextensive with the widest conception of fine art and the fine arts as they exist in civilized and developed communities. I0 It insists on and brings into the light the free or optional character of these activities, as distinguished from others to which we are compelled by necessity or duty, as well as the fact that these activities, superfluous as they may be from the points of view of necessity and of duty, spring nevertheless from an imperious and a saving See also:instinct of our nature. It does See also:justice to the part which is, or at any rate may be, filled in the world by pleasures which are apart from profit, and by delights for the enjoyment of which men cannot See also:quarrel. It claims the dignity they deserve for those shows and pastimes in which we have found a way to make permanent all the transitory delights of life and nature, to turn even our griefs and yearnings, by their artistic utterance, into See also:sources of appeasing joy, to make amends to ourselves for the confusion and imperfection of reality by conceiving and imaging forth the semblances of things clearer and more complete, since in contriving them we incorporate with the experiences we have had the better experiences we have dreamed of and longed for. One manifestly weak point of Schiller's theory is that though it asserts that man ought only to play with the beautiful, and Hs weak that he is his best or ideal self only when he does so, points. yet it does not sufficiently indicate what kinds of play are beautiful nor why we .are moved to adopt them. It does not show how the delights of the eye and spirit in contemplating forms, colours and movements, of the See also:ear and spirit in apprehending musical and verbal sounds, or of the whole mind at once in following the comprehensive current of images called up by poetry—it does not clearly show how delights like these differ from those yielded by other kinds of play or pastime, which are by common consent excluded from the sphere of fine art. The chase, for instance, is a play or pastime which gives See also:scope for any amount of premeditated skill; it has pleasures, for Kinds of those who take part in it, which are in some degree play analogous to the pleasures of the artist; we all know which the claims made on behalf of the See also:noble art of venerie are not (following true See also:medieval precedent) by the knights flee art. and woodmen of See also:Sir See also:Walter See also:Scott's romances. It is an obvious reply to say that though the chase is play to us, who in civilized communities follow it on no plea of necessity, yet to a not remote ancestry it was See also:earnest; in primitive societies hunting does not belong to the class of optional activities at all, but is among the most pressing of utilitarian needs. But this reply loses much of its force since we have learnt how many of the fine arts, however emancipated from direct utility now, have as a matter of history been evolved out of activities primarily utilitarian. It would be more to the point to remark that the pleasures of the sportsman are the only pleasures arising from the chase; his exertions afford See also:pain to the victim, and no satisfaction to any class of recipients but himself; or at least the sympathetic pleasures of the lookers-on at a See also:hunt or at a See also:battle are hardly to be counted as pleasures of artistic contemplation. The issue which they See also:witness is a real issue; the skilled endeavours with which they sympathize are put forth for a definite practical result, and a result disastrous to one ,of the parties concerned. What then, it may be asked, about athletic See also:games and See also:sports, which hurt nobody, have no connexion with the chase, and give pleasure to thousands of spectators ? Here the difference is, that the event which excites the spectator's interest and pleasure at a race or match or athletic contest is not a wholly unreal or simulated event; it is less real than life, but it is more real than art. The contest has no momentous practical consequences, but it is a contest, an 'Mhos, all the same, in which competitors put forth real strength, and one really wins and others are defeated. Such a struggle, in which the exertions are real and the issue uncertain, we follow with an excitement and a suspense different in kind from the feelings with which we contemplate a fictitious representation. For example, let the reader recall the feelings with which he may have watched a real See also:fencing bout, and compare them with those with which he watches the' simulated "fencing bout in See also:Shakespeare's See also:Hamlet.
The instance is a See also:crucial one, because in the fictitious ease the excitement is heightened by the introduction of the poisoned See also:foil, and by the tremendous consequences which we are aware will turn, in the representation; on the issue. Yet because the fencing See also:scene in Hamlet is a representation, and not real, we find ourselves watching it in a See also:mood quite different from that in which we See also:watch the most ordinary real fencing-match with vizors and See also:blunt foils; a mood more exalted, if the representation is good, but amid the aesthetic emotions of which the fluctuations of strained, if trivial, suspense and the eagerness of sympathetic participation find no place. "The delight of tragedy," says See also: But it is urged at the same time that these twin impulses, rooted as they both are among the primordial faculties both of men and animals, are far from existing merely to provide a vent whereby the superfluous energies of sentient beings may See also:discharge themselves at pleasure, but are indispensable utilitarian instincts, by which the See also:young are led to practise and rehearse in See also:sport those activities the exercise of which in earnest will be necessary to their preservation in the adult state. (The researches of See also:Professor Karl Groos in this See also: The special qualities of pleasure felt and communicated by doing things in one way rather than another, independently of direct utility, which we indicated at the outset as characteristic of the whole range of the fine arts, appear on this showing to be dependent primarily on the response of our organic sensibilities of See also:nerve and muscle, eye, ear and See also:brain to the stimulus of rhythm (using the word in its widest sense) imparted either to our own actions and utterances or to the works of our hands. Such pleasures would seem to have been first experienced by man directly, in the endeavour to find relief with limbs and voice from states of emotional tension, and then incidentally, as a kind of by-product arising and affording similar relief in the development of a wide range of utilitarian activities. Into the nature of those organic sensibilities, and the grounds of the relief they afford us when gratified, it is the province of physiological and psychological aesthetics to inquire: our business here is only with the activities directed towards their satisfaction and the results of those activ ties in the. works of fine art. On the whole the account of the matter yielded by the method of anthropological research, and here very briefly summarized, may be accepted as answering more closely to the complex nature of the facts than any of the accounts hitherto current; and so we may expand our first tentative See also:suggestion of a definition into one more complete, which from the nature of the case cannot be very brief or simple and must run somehow thus: Fine art is everything which man does or makes in one way rather than another, freely and with premeditation, in order to expressand arouse emotion, in obedience to laws of rhythmic movement or utterance or regulated design, and with results independent of direct utility and capable of affording to many permanent and disinterested delight. II. Of the Fine Arts severally. Architecture, sculpture, painting, music and poetry are by common consent, as has been said at the outset, the five principal or. greater fine arts practised among developed com- munities of men. It is possible in thought to group Moaes -n which the these five arts in as many different orders as there are five among them different kinds of relation or See also:affinity. greater One thinker fixes his attention upon one kind of rela- arts have tions as the most important, and arranges his group classified. accordingly; another upon another; and each, when he has done so, is very prone to claim for his arrangement the virtue of being the See also:sole essentially and fundamentally true. For example, we may ascertain one kind of relations between the arts by inquiring which is the simplest or most limited in its effects, which next simplest, which another degree less simple,. which least simple or most complex of them all. This, the relation of progressive complexity or comprehensiveness between the fine arts, is the relation upon which Auguste See also:Comte fixed his attention, and it yields in his judgment the following order:—Architecture lowest in complexity, because both of the kinds of effects which it produces and of the material conditions and limitations under which it works; sculpture next; painting third; then music; and poetry highest, as the most complex or comprehensive art of all, both in its own special effects and in its resources for ideally calling up the effects of all the other arts as well as all the phenomena of nature and experiences of life. A somewhat similar grouping was adopted, though from the consideration of a wholly different set of relations, by See also:Hegel. Hegel fixed his attention on the varying relations See also:borne by the idea, or spiritual element, to the embodiment of the idea, or material element, in each art. Leaving aside that part of his doctrine which concerns, not the phenomena of the arts them-selves, but their place in the dialectical world-See also:plan or scheme of the universe, Hegel said in effect something like this. In certain ages and among certain races, as in See also:Egypt and See also:Assyria, and again in the See also:Gothic age of See also:Europe, mankind has only dim ideas for art to See also:express, ideas insufficiently disengaged and realized, of which the expression cannot be complete or lucid, but only adumbrated and imperfect; the characteristic art of those ages is a symbolic art, with its material element predominating over and keeping down its spiritual; and such a symbolic art is architecture. In other ages, as in the See also:Greek age, the ideas of men have come to be definite, disengaged, and clear; the characteristic art of such an age will be one in which the spiritual and material elements are in See also:equilibrium, and neither predominates over nor keeps down the other, but a thoroughly realized idea is expressed in a thoroughly adequate and lucid form; this is the mode of expression called classic, and the classic art is sculpture. In other ages, again, and such are the modern ages of Europe, the idea grows in power and becomes importunate; the spiritual and material elements are no longer in equilibrium, but the spiritual element predominates; the characteristic arts of such an age will be those in which thought, See also:passion, sentiment, aspiration, emotion, emerge in freedom, dealing with material form as masters or declining its shackles altogether; this is the romantic mode of expression, and the romantic arts are painting, music and poetry. A later systematizer, See also:Lotze, fixed his attention on the relative degrees of freedom or See also:independence which the several arts enjoy—their freedom, that is, from the necessity of either imitating given facts of nature or ministering, as part of their task, to given practical uses. In his grouping, instead of the order architecture, sculpture, painting, music, poetry, music comes first, because it has neither to imitate any natural facts nor to serve any practical end; architecture next, because, though it is tied to useful ends and material conditions, yet it is free frofn the task of imitation, and pleases the eye in its degree, by pure form, light and shade, and the rest, as music sufficient. must necessarily be provisional, according to the particular class of relations which it keeps in view. And for practical purposes it is requisite to See also:bear in mind not one classification but several. Fixing our attention, not upon complicated or problematical relations between the various arts, but only upon their simple and undisputed relations, and giving the first place in our consideration to the five greater arts of architecture, sculpture, painting, music and poetry, we shall find at least three principal modes in which every fine art either resembles or differs from the rest. 1. The Shaping and the Speaking Arts (or Arts of Form and Arts of Utterance, or Arts of Space and Arts of Time).—Each of the greater First arts either makes something or not which can be seen and siflca- handled. The arts which make something which can be as teas the seen and handled are architecture, sculpture and painting.
shaping In the products or results of all these arts See also:external matter and the is in some way or another manually put together, fashioned speaking or disposed. But music and poetry do not produce any
arts. results of this kind. What music produces is something
that can be heard, and what poetry produces is something that can be either heard or read—which last is a kind of ideal hearing, having for its See also:avenue the eye instead of the ear, and for its material, written signs for words instead of the spoken words themselves. Now what the eye See also:sees from any one point of view, it sees all at once; in other words, the parts of anything we see fill or occupy not time but space, and reach us from various points in space at a single simultaneous See also:perception. If we are at the proper distance we see at one glance a See also:house from the ground to the chimneys, a statue from head to See also:foot, and in a picture at once the foreground and background, and everything that is within the four corners of the frame. There is, indeed, this distinction to be See also:drawn, that in walking See also:round or through a See also:temple, See also: The arts which surround us in space with stationary effects for the eye, as the house we live in, the pictures on the walls, the See also:marble figure in the See also:vestibule, are stationary, hold a different kind of place in our experience—not a greater or a higher place, but essentially a different place—from the arts which provide us with transitory effects in time, effects capable of being awakened for the ear or mind at any moment, as a symphony is awakened by playing and an See also:ode by reading, but lying in See also:abeyance until we bid that moment come, and passing away when the performance or the reading is over. Such, indeed, is the practical force of the distinction that in modern usage the expression fine art, or even art is often used by itself in a sense which tacitly excludes music and poetry, and signifies the group of manual or shaping arts alone. As between three of the five greater arts and the other two, the distinction on which we are now dwelling is complete. Buildings, statues, pictures, belong strictly to sight and space; to tnter- time and to hearing, real through the ear, or ideal through mediate the mind in reading, belong music and poetry. Among class of the lesser or subordinate arts, however, there are several arts of in which this distinction finds no place, and which produce, motion. in space and time at once, effects midway between the stationary or See also:stable, and the transitory or fleeting. Such is the dramatic art, in which the actor makes with his actions and gestures, or several actors make with the combination of their different actions and gestures, a kind of shifting picture, which appeals to the eyes of the witnesses while the sung or spoken words of the drama See also:appeal to their ears; thus making of them spectators and auditors at once, and associating with the pure time art of words the mixed time-and-space art of bodily movements. As all movement whatsoever is necessarily movement through space, and takes time to happen, so every other fine art which is wholly or in part an act of movement partakes in like manner of this double character. Along with acting thus comes dancing. Dancing, when it is of the mimic character, may itself be a kind of acting; historically, indeed, the dancer's art was the See also:parent of the actor's; whether apart from or in See also:conjunction with the mimic element, dancing is an art in which bodily movements obey, accompany, and, as it were, express or accentuate in space the time effects of music. Eloquence or See also:oratory in like manner, so far as its power depends on studied and pre-meditated gesture, is also an art which to some extent enforces its See also:primary appeal through the ear in time by a secondary appeal through the eye in space. So much for the first distinction, that between the shaping or space arts and the speaking or time arts, with the intermediate and subordinate class of arts which, like acting, dancing, oratory, add to the pure time element a mixed time-and-space element. These last can hardly be called shaping arts, because it is his own person, and not anything outside himself, which the actor, the dancer, the orator disposes or adjusts; they may perhaps best be called arts of motion, or moving arts. 2. The Imitative and the Non-Imitative Arts.—Each art either does or does not represent or imitate something which exists already in nature. Of the five greater fine arts, those which thus represent objects existing in nature are sculpture, painting iSecondassiflca• and poetry. Those which do not represent anything so flop: the existing are music and architecture. On this principle we imitative get a new grouping. Two shaping or space arts and one and non-speaking or time art now form the imitative group of imitative sculpture, painting and poetry; while one space art and arts one time art form the non-imitative group of music and architecture. The mixed space-and-time arts of the actor, and of the dancer, so far as he or she is also a mimic, belong, of course, by their very name and nature, to the imitative class. It was the imitative character of the fine arts which chiefly occupied the attention of Aristotle. But in order to understand the art theories of Aristotle it is necessary to bear in mind The the very different meanings which the idea of imitation imitative See also:bore to his mind and bears to ours. For Aristotle the imitati e idea of imitation or representation (mimesis) was extended fu art so as to denote the expressing, evoking or making See also:manifest according of anything whatever, whether material objects or ideas toAils. or feelings. Music and dancing, by which utterance or totie. expression is given to emotions that may be quite detached from all definite ideas or images, are thus for him varieties of imitation. He says, indeed, most music and dancing, as if he was aware that there were exceptions, but he does not indicate what the exceptions are; and under the head of imitative music, he distinctly reckons some kinds of instrumental music without words. But in our own more restricted usage, to imitate means to copy, mimic or represent some existing phenomenon, some definite reality of experience; and we can only call those imitative arts which bring before us such things, either directly by showing us their actual likeness, as sculpture does in solid form, and as painting does by means of lines and colours on a plane surface, or else indirectly, by calling up ideas or images of them in the mind, as poetry and literature do by means of words. It is by a stretch of ordinary usage Io less; eloquence in all kinds, so far as it is studied and not merely spontaneous; and among the arts which fashion or dispose material objects, See also:embroidery and the weaving of patterns, pottery, glassmaking, See also:goldsmith's work and See also:jewelry, joiner's work, gardening (according to the claim of some), and a See also:score of other dexterities and See also:industries which are more than mere dexterities and industries because they add elements of beauty and pleasure to elements of serviceableness and use. To decide whether any given one of these has a right to the title of fine art, and, if so, to which of the greater fine arts it should be thought of as appended and subordinate, or between which two of them intermediate, is often no easy task. The weak point of all classifications of the kind of which we have above given examples is that each is intended to be No one final, and to serve instead of any other. The truth classiflea- is, that the relations between the several fine arts are See also:don final much too complex for any single classification to bear or this character. Every classification of the fine arts pleases the ear by pure sound; then, as arts all tied to the task of imitation, sculpture, painting and poetry, taken in progressive order according to the progressing comprehensiveness of their several resources. The thinker on these subjects has, moreover, to consider the enumeration and classification of the lesser or subordinate fine place of arts. Whole clusters or families of these occur to the the minor mind at once; such as dancing, an art subordinate or sub- to music, but quite different in kind; acting, an art See also:ordinate See also:auxiliary to poetry, from which in kind it differs no tine arts. that we apply the word imitation even to this last way of representing things; since words are no true likeness of, but only customary signs for, the thing they represent. And those arts we cannot call imitative at all, which by combinations of abstract sound or form express and arouse emotions unattended by the recognizable likeness, idea or See also:image of any definite thing. Now the emotions of music when music goes along with words, whether in the shape of actual song or even of the instrumental Non- See also:accompaniment of song, are no doubt in a certain sense N imitative attended with definite ideas; those, namely, which are character expressed by the words themselves. But the same ideas ofmuslc would be conveyed to the mind equally well by the same words if they were simply spoken. What the music contributes is a special element of its own, an element of pure emotion, aroused through the sense of hearing, which heightens the effect of the words upon the feelings without helping to elucidate them for the understanding. Nay, it is well known that a song well sung produces its intended effect upon the feelings almost as fully though we fail to catch the words or are ignorant of the language to which they belong. Thus the view of Aristotle cannot be defended on the ground that he was See also:familiar with music only in an elementary form, and principally as the direct accompaniment of words, and that in his day the modern development of the art, as an art for building up constructions of independent sound, vast and intricate fabrics of melody and harmony detached from words, was a thing not yet imagined. That is perfectly true; the immense technical and intellectual development of music, both in its resources and its capacities, is an achievement of the modern world; but the essential character of musical sound is the same in its most elementary as in its most complicated stage. Its privilege is to give delight, not by communicating definite ideas, or calling up particular images, but by appealing to certain organic sensibilities in our nerves of hearing, and through such appeal expressing on the one part and arousing on the other a unique kind of emotion. The emotion caused by music may be altogether independent of any ideas conveyable by words. Or it may serve to intensify and enforce other emotions arising at the same time in connexion with the ideas conveyed by words; and it was one of the contentions of See also:Richard See also:Wagner that in the former phase the art is now exhausted, and that only in the latter are new conquests in See also:store for it. But in either case the music is the music, and is like nothing else; it is no representation or similitude of anything whatsoever. But does not instrumental music, it will be said, sometimes really imitate the sounds of nature, as the piping of birds, the whispering An obfec- of See also:woods, the moaning of storms or See also:explosion of See also:thunder; See also:Ann and or does it not, at any rate, suggest these things by resem- its answer. blances so See also:close that they almost amount in the strict sense to imitation? Occasionally, it is true, music does allow itself these playful excursions into a region of quasi-imitation or mimicry. It modifies the character of its abstract sounds into something, so to speak, more concrete, and, instead of sensations which are like nothing else, affords us sensations which recognizably resemble those we receive from some of the sounds of nature. But such excursions are hazardous, and to make them often is the surest See also:proof of vulgarity in a musician. Neither are the successful effects of the great composers in evoking ideas of particular natural pheno- See also:mena generally in the nature of real imitations or representations; although passages such as the notes of the See also:dove and See also:nightingale in See also:Haydn s Creation, and of the See also:cuckoo in Beethoven's See also:Pastoral Sym- phony, the bleating of the sheep in the Don Quixote symphony of Richard See also:Strauss, must be acknowledged to be exceptions. Again, it is a recognized fact concerning the effect of instrumental music on those of its hearers who try to translate such effect into words, that they will all find themselves in tolerable agreement as to the meaning of any passage so long as they only See also:attempt to describe it in terms of vague emotion, and to say such and such a passage expresses, as the case may be, dejection or See also:triumph, effort or the relaxation of effort, eagerness or languor, suspense or fruition, anguish or See also:glee. But their agreement comes to an end the moment they begin to See also:associate, in their See also:interpretation, definite ideas with these vague emotions; then we find that what suggests in idea to one hearer the vicissitudes of war will suggest to another, or to the same at another time, the vicissitudes of love, to another those of spiritual yearning and aspiration, to another, it may be, those of changeful travel by See also:forest, field and ocean, to another those of life's practical struggle and ambition. The See also:infinite variety of ideas which may thus be called up in different minds by the same See also:strain of music is proof enough that the music is not like any particular thing. The torrent of varied and entrancing emotion which it pours along the See also:heart, emotion latent and undivined until the spell of sound begins, that is music's achievement and its See also:secret. It is this effect, whether coupled or not with a trained intellectual recognition of the highly abstract and elaborate nature of the laws of the relation, succession and combinations of sounds on which the effect depends, that has caused some thinkers, with See also:Schopenhauer at their head, to find in music the nearest approach. we have to a voice from behind the See also:veil, a universal voice expressing the central purpose and deepest essence of things, unconfused by fleeting actualities or by the distracting duty of calling up images of particular and perishable phenomena. " Music," in Schopenhauer's own words, " reveals the innermost essential being of the world, and expresses the highest See also:wisdom in a language the reason does not understand." Aristotle endeavoured to frame a classification of the arts, in their several applications and developments, on two grounds—the nature of the objects imitated by each, and the means or instru- Definition ments employed in the imitation. But in the case of of music. music, as it exists in the modern world, the first part of this endeavour falls to the ground, because the object imitated has, in the sense in which we now use the word imitation, no existence. The means employed by music are successions and combinations of vocal or instrumental sounds regulated according to the three conditions of time and pitch (which together make up melody) and harmony, or the relations of different strains of time and See also:tone co-operant but not parallel. With these means, music either creates her independent constructions, or else accompanies, adorns, enforces the imitative art of speech—but herself imitates not; and may be best defined simply as a speaking or time art, of which the business is to express and arouse emotion by successions and combinations of regulated sound. That which music is thus among the speaking or time-arts, architecture is among the shaping or space-arts. As music appeals to our faculties for taking pleasure in non-imitative Noacombinations of transitory sound, so architecture appeals imitative to our faculties for taking pleasure in non-imitative character combinations of stationary See also:mass. Corresponding to the of archisystem of ear-effects or combinations of time, tone and tecture. harmony with which music works, architecture works with a system of eye-effects or combinations of mass, See also:contour, light and shade; colour, proportion, interval, See also:alternation of plain and decorated parts, regularity and variety in regularity, apparent stability, vastness, appropriateness and the rest. Only the materials of architecture are not volatile and intangible like sound, but solid See also:timber, See also:brick, See also: 364 forest trunks and See also:meeting branches were more or less consciously imaged in their piers and vaultings. In the temple-palaces of Egypt, one of the regular architectural members, the sustaining See also:pier, is often systematically wrought in the actual likeness of a conventionalized cluster of See also:lotus stems, with lotus See also:flowers for the See also:capital. When we come to the fashion, not rare in Greek architecture, of carving this same sustaining member, the See also:column, in complete human likeness, and employing caryatids, canephori, atlases or the like, to support the See also:entablature of a building, it then becomes difficult to say whether we have to do with a work of architecture or of sculpture. The case, at any rate, is different from that in which the sculptor is called in to See also:supply surface decoration to the various members of a building, or to fill with the products of his own art spaces in the building specially contrived and See also:left vacant for that purpose. When the imitative feature is in itself an indispensable member of the architectural construction, to architecture rather than sculpture we shall probably do best to assign it. Defining architecture, then (apart from its utility, which for the present we leave out of consideration), as a shaping art, of which the Definition function is to express and arouse emotion by combinations of ordered and decorated mass, we pass from the character- of h istics of the non-imitative to those of the imitative group tecture. of arts, namely sculpture, painting and poetry. If we keep in mind the source and origin of these arts, we must remember what has already been observed, that they spring by no means from man's love of imitation alone, but from his desire to record and commemorate experience, using the See also:faculty of imitation as his means. Mnemosyne (Memory) was in Greek tradition the See also:mother of the See also:Muses; imitation, in the sense above defined, is but their instrument. Hence we might think " arts of record " a better name for this group than arts of imitation. The answer is—but a large part of pure architecture is also commemorative; from the pyramids and obelisks of Egypt down there are many monuments in which the impulse of men to perpetuate their own or others' memories has worked without any aid of imitation: Hence as the definition of a class of arts contrasted with architecture and music the name " arts of record " would fail; and we have to fall back on the current and established name of the " imitative arts." In considering them we cannot do better than follow that Aristotelian See also:division which describes each art according, first, to the objects which it imitates, and, secondly, to the means it employs. Taking sculpture first, as imitating a smaller range of objects than the other two, and imitating them more completely: sculpture may Sculpture have for the objects of its imitation the shapes of whatever as an things possess length, breadth and magnitude. For its an art means or See also:instruments it has solid form, which the sculptor either carves out of a hard substance, as in the case of See also:wood and stone, or See also:models in a yielding substance, as in the case of See also:clay and See also:wax, or casts in a dissolved or molten substance, as in the case of See also:plaster and of metal in certain uses, or beats, draws or chases in a malleable and ductile substance, as in the case of metal in other uses, or stamps from See also:dies or moulds, a method sometimes used in all soft or fusible materials. Thus a statue or statuette may either be carved straight out of a bi;pck of stone or wood, or first modelled in clay or wax, then moulded in plaster or some equivalent material, and then carved in stone or See also:cast in See also:bronze. A See also:gem is wrought in stone by cutting and grinding. Figures in jeweller's work are wrought by beating and See also:chasing; a medallion by beating and chasing or else by stamping from a See also:die; a See also:coin by stamping from a die; and so forth. The See also:process of modelling (Gr. sr1arrecr) in a soft substance being regarded as the typical process of the sculptor, the name plastic art has been given to his operations in general. In general terms, the task of sculpture is to imitate solid form with solid form. But sculptured form may be either completely or in- solid. Sculpture in xacttlytreproduces, whether on the orriginal or o al form Sculpture e different in the he scale, the relations or proportions of the object imitated round in the three dimensions of length, breadth and See also:depth or and la relief thickness. Sculpture in incompletely solid form re- produces the proportions of the objects with exactness only so far as concerns two of its dimensions, namely, those of length and breadth; while the third See also:dimension, that of depth or thickness, it reproduces in a diminished proportion, leaving it. to the eye to infer, from the partial degree of See also:projection given to the work, the full projection of the object imitated. The former, or completely solid kind of sculpture, is called sculpture in the round; its works stand free, and can be walked round and seen from all points. The latter, or incompletely solid kind of sculpture, is called sculpture in relief ; its works do not stand free, but are engaged in or attached to a background, and can only be seen from in front. According, in the latter kind of sculpture, to its degree of projection from the background, a work is said to be in high or in See also:low ,relief. Sculpture in the round and sculpture in relief are alike in this, that the properties of objects which they imitate are their external forms as defined by their outlines—that is, by the boundaries and circumscriptions of their masses—and their light and shade—the See also:lights and shadows, that is, which diversify the curved surfaces of the masses in consequence of their alternations and gradations of projection and recession. But the two kinds of sculpture differ in this. A work[CLASSIFICATION of sculpture in the round- imitates the whole of the outlines by which the object imitated is circumscribed in the three dimensions of space, and presents to the eye, as the object: itself would do, a new outline succeeding the last every moment as you walk round it. Whereas a work of sculpture in relief imitates only one outline of any object; it takes, so to speak, a See also:section of the object as seen from a particular point, and traces on the background the boundary-line of that particular section; merely suggesting, by modelling the surface within such boundary according to a regular, but a diminished, ratio of projection, the other outlines which the object would present if seen from all sides successively: As sculpture in the round reproduces the real relations of a solid object in space, it follows that the only kind of object which it can reproduce with pleasurable effect according to the laws Sab)ects of regulated or rhythmical design must be one not too property vast or complicated, one that can afford to be detached sculpture and isolated from its surroundings, and of which all the in the parts can easily be perceived and apprehended in their roun& organic relations. Further; it will need to be an object interesting enough to mankind in general to make them take delight in seeing it reproduced with all its parts in complete imitation. And again, it must be such that some considerable part of the interest, lies in those particular properties of outline, play of surface, and light and shade which it is the special function of sculpture to reproduce. Thus a sculptured representation in the sound, say, of a See also:mountain with cities on it, would hardly be a sculpture at all; it,could only be a See also:model, and as a model might have value; but value as a work of fine art it could nothave, because the object imitated would lack organic definiteness and completeness; it would lack universality of interest, and of the interest which it did possess, a very inconsiderable part would depend upon its properties of outline, surface, and light and shade. Obviously there is no kind of object in the world that ao well unites the requited cohditions for pleasurable imitation in sculpture as the human body. It is at once the most complete of organisms, and the shape of all others the most subtle as well as the most intelligible in its outlines; the most habitually detached in active or stationary freedom; the most interesting to mankind, because its own; the richest in those particular effects, contours and modulations, contrasts, harmonies and transitions of modelled surface and circumscribing line, which it is the prerogative of sculpture to imitate. Accordingly the object of imitation for this art is pre-eminently the body of man or woman. That it has not been for the sake of representing men and See also:women as such, but for the sake of representing gods in the likeness of men and women, that the human form has been most enthusiastic-ally studied, does not affect this fact in the theory of the art, though it is a consideration of great importance in its history. Besides the human form, sculpture may imitate the forms of those of the lower animals whose physical endowments have something of a kindred perfection, with other natural or artificial objects as maybe needed merely by way of See also:accessory or See also:symbol. The body must for the purposes of this art be divested of covering, or covered only with such tissues as reveal, translate or play about without concealing it. Chiefly in lands and ages where See also:climate and social use have given the sculptor the opportunity of studying human forms so draped or undraped has this art attained perfection, and become exemplary and enviable to that of other races. Relief sculpture is more closely connected with architecture than. the other kind, and indeed is commonly used in subordination to it. But if its task is thus somewhat different from that of sculpture in the round, its principal objects of imitation Subjects are the same. The human, body remains the principal /'roper for theme of the sculptor in relief but the nature of his art scuu'r allows, and sometimes compete, him to include other - relief, objects in the range of his imitation. As he has not to represent the real depth or projection of things, but only to suggest them according to a ratio which he may See also:fix himself, so he can introduce into the third or depth dimension, thus arbitraril reduced, a multitude of objects for which the sculptor in the round, having to observe the real ratio of the three dimensions, has no See also:room. He can place one figure in slightly raised outline emerging from behind the more fully raised outline of another, and by the same system can add to his representation rocks, trees, nay mountains and cities and birds on the wing. But the more he uses this liberty the less will he be truly a sculptor. Solid modelling, and real light and shade, are the- special means or instruments of effect which the sculptor alone among imitative artiste enjoys. Single outlines and cohtours,:the choice of one particular section and the tracing of its circumscription, are- means which the sculptor enjoys in common with the painter or draughtsman. And indeed, when we consider works executed wholly or in part in very low relief, whether See also:Assyrian battle-pieces and hunting-pieces in See also:alabaster or bronze, or the backgrounds carved in bronze, marble or wood by the Italian sculptors who followed the example set by See also:Ghiberti at the Renaissance, we shall see that the principle of such work is not the principle of sculpture at all. Its effect depends little on qualities of surface-light and shadow, and mainly on qualities of contour, as traced by a slight line of shadow on the See also:side away from the light, and a slight line of light on the side next to it. And we may fairly hesitate whether we shalt rank the artist who works on this` principle, which The hnitative arts are arts of record using Imitation as their means. is properly a graphic rather than a plastic principle, among sculptors or among draughtsmen. The above are cases in which the relief sculptor exercises his liberty in the introduction of other objects besides human figures into his sculptured compositions. But there is another kind of relief sculpture in which the artist has less choice. That is, the kind in which the sculptor is called in to decorate with carved work parts of an architectural construction which are not adapted for the introduction of figure subjects, or for their introduction only as features in a scheme of ornament that comptises many other elements. To this head belongs most of the carving of capitals, See also:mouldings, friezes (except the friezes of Greek temples), bands, cornices, and, in the Gothic See also:style, of See also:doorway See also:arches, niches, canopies, pinnacles, brackets, spandrels and the thousand members and parts of members ,which that style so exquisitely adorned with true or conventionalized imitations of natural forms. This is no doubt a subordinate function of the art; and it is impossible, as we have seen already, to find a precise line of demarcation between carving, in this decorative use, which is properly sculpture, and that which belongs properly to architecture. Leaving such discussions, we may content ourselves with the definition of sculpture as a shaping art, of which the business is to Definition express and arouse emotion by the imitation of natural of objects, and principally the human body, in solid form, senlptore, reproducing either their true proportions in three dimensions, or their proportions in the two dimensions of length and breadth only, with a diminished proportion in the third dimension of depth or thickness. In considering bas-relief as a form of sculpture, we have found ourselves approaching the confines of the second of the shaping Painting imitative arts, the graphic art or art of painting. Painting, as an as to its means or instruments of imitation, dispenses imitative with the third dimension altogether. It imitates natural art objects by representing them as they are represented on the retina of the eye itself, simply as an assemblage of variously shaped and variously shaded patches of colour on a fiat surface. Painting does not reproduce the third dimension of reality by any third dimension of its own whatever; but leaves the eye to infer the solidity of objects, their recession and projection, their nearness and remoteness, by the same See also:perspective signs by which it also infers those facts in nature, namely, by the direction of their several boundary lines, the incidence and See also:distribution of their lights and shadows, the strength or faintness of their tones of colour. Hence this art has an infinitely greater range and freedom than any form of sculpture. Near and far is all the same to it, and Range of whatever comes into the field of See also:vision can come also objects into the field of a picture; trees as well as persons, and Imitable by clouds as well as trees, and stars as well as clouds; the paining remotest mountain snows, as well as the See also:violet of the foreground, and far-off multitudes of See also:people as well as one or two near the eye. Whatever any man has seen, or can imagine himself as seeing, that he can also fix by painting, subject only to one great See also:limitation,—that of the range of brightness which he is able to attain in imitating natural colour illuminated by light. In this particular his art can but correspond according to a greatly diminished ratio with the effects of nature. But excepting this it can do for the eye almost all that nature herself does; or at least all that nature would do if man had only one eye since the three dimensions of space produce upon our See also:binocular machinery of vision a particular stereoscopic effect of which a picture, with its two dimensions only, is incapable. The range of the art being thus almost unbounded, its selections have naturally been dictated by the varying interest felt in this or that subject of representation by the societies among whom the art has at various times been practised. As in sculpture, so in painting, the human form has always held the first place. For the painter, the intervention of See also:costume between man and his environment is not a misfortune in the same degree as it is for the sculptor. For him, clothes of whatever fashion or See also:amplitude have their own charm; they serve to diversify the aspect of the world, and to express the characters and stations, if not the physical frames, of his personages; and he is as happy or happier among the brocades of Venice as among the See also:bare limbs of the Spartan See also:palaestra. Along with man, there come into painting all animals and vegetation, all man's See also:furniture and belongings, his dwelling-places, See also:fields and landscape; and in modern times also landscape and nature for their own sakes, skies, seas, mountains and wildernesses apart from man. Besides the two questions about any art, what objects does it imitate, and by the use of what means or instruments, Aristotle The chief proposes (in the case of poetry) the further question, forms or which of several possible forms does the imitation in any modes of given case assume? We may See also:transfer very nearly the painting: same inquiry to painting, and may ask, concerning any sine, sigh!- Painter, according to which of three possible systems he and-shade works. The three possible systems are (I) that which and colour. attends principally to the configuration and relations of natural objects as indicated by the direction of their boundaries. for defining which there is a See also:convention in universal use, the convention, that is, of line; this may be called for short the system of line; (2) that which attends chiefly to their configuration and relations as indicated by the incidence and distribution 'it their lights and shadows—this is the system of light-and-shade or See also:chiaroscuro; and (3) that which attends chiefly, not to their See also:con-figuration at all, but to the distribution, qualities and relations of See also:local colours upon their surface—this is the system of colour. It is not possible for a painter to imitate natural objects to the eye at all without either defining their boundaries by outlines, or suggesting the shape of their masses by juxtapositions of light and dark or of local colours. In the complete art of painting, of course, all three methods are employed at once. But in what is known as outline drawing and outline engraving, one of the three methods only is employed, line; in monochrome pictures, and in shaded drawings and engravings, two only, line with light-and-shade; and in the various shadeless forms of decorative painting and colour-printing, two only, line with colour. Even in the most accomplished examples of the complete art of painting, as was pointed out by See also:Ruskin, we find that there almost always prevails a predilection for some one of these three parts of painting over the other two. Thus among the mature Italians of the Renaissance, See also:Titian is above all things a painter in colour, See also:Michelangelo in line, Leonardo in light-and-shade. Many See also:academic painters in their day tried to combine the three methods in equal See also:balance; to the impetuous spirit of the great Venetian, See also:Tintoretto, it was alone given to make the attempt with a great measure of success. A great part of the effort of modern painting has been to get rid of the linear convention altogether, to banish line and develop the resources of the oil medium in imitating on See also:canvas, more strictly than the early masters attempted, the actual See also:appearance of things on the retina as an assemblage of coloured streaks and patches modified and toned in the play of light-and-shade and See also:atmosphere. It remains to consider, for the purpose of our classification, what are the technical varieties of the painter's See also:craft. Since we gave the generic name of painting to all imitation of natural objects Tecba/ca by the assemblage of lines, colours and lights and darks varieties on a single plane, we must logically include as varieties of of the painting not odly the ordinary crafts of spreading or painters laying pictures on an opaque surface in See also:fresco, oil, die- craft. See also:temper or water-colour, but also the craft of arranging a picture to be seen by the transmission of light through a transparent substance, in See also:glass painting; the craft of fitting together a multitude of solid cubes or cylinders so that their See also:united surface forms a picture to the eye, as in See also:mosaic; the craft of spreading vitreous colours in a state of See also:fusion so that they form a picture when hardened, as in See also:enamel; and even, it would seem, the crafts of weaving, See also:tapestry, and embroidery, since these also yield to the eye a plane surface figured in imitation of nature. As drawing we must also See also:count incised or engraved work of all kinds representing merely the out-lines of objects and not their modellings, as for instance the graffiti on Greek and See also:Etruscan See also:mirror-backs and dressing-cases; while raised work in low relief, in which outlines are plainly marked and modellings neglected, furnishes, as we have seen, a doubtful class between sculpture and painting. In all figures that are first modelled in the solid and then variously coloured, sculpture and painting bear a common share; and by far the greater part both of ancient and, medieval statuary was in fact tinted so as to imitate or at least suggest the colours of life. But as the special characteristic of sculpture, solidity in the third dimension, is in these cases present, it is to that art and not to painting that we shall still ascribe the resulting work. With these indications we may leave the art of painting defined in general terms as a shaping or space art, of which the business is to express and arouse emotion by the imitation of all kinds of Definition natural objects, reproducing on a plane surface the relations of of their boundary lines, lights and shadows, or colours, or painting. all three of these appearances together. The next and last of the imitative arts is the speaking art of poetry. The transition from sculpture and painting to poetry is, from the point of view not of our present but of our first division Pastry as among the fine arts, abrupt and See also:absolute. It is a transition an imitsfrom space into time, from the sphere of material formse art to the sphere of immaterial images. Following Aristotle's method, we may define the objects of poetry's imitation or evocation, as everything of which the idea or image can be called up by words, that is, every force and phenomenon of nature, every operation and result of art, every fact of life and history, or every imagination of such a fact, every thought and feeling of the human spirit, for which mankind in the course of its long evolution has been able to create in speech an explicit and appropriate sign. The means or instruments of poetry's imitation are these verbal signs or words, arranged in lines, strophes or stanzas,, so that their sounds have some of the regulated qualities and direct emotional effect of music. The three chief modes or forms of the imitation may still be defined as they were defined by Aristotle himself. First comes the epic or narrative form, in which the poet speaks alternately The chief for himself and his characters, now describing their ,m= it situations and feelings in his own words, and anon making modes of each of them speak in the first person for himself. Second oetry. comes the lyric form, in which the poet speaks in his own name exclusively, and gives expression to sentiments which are purely personal. Third comes the dramatic form, in which the poet does not speak for himself at all, but only puts into the mouths of each of his personages successively such discourse as he thinks appropriate to the part. The last of these three forms of poetry, the dramatic, calls, if it is merely read, on the imagination of the reader to fill up those circumstances of situation, See also:action and the rest, which in the first or epic form are supplied by the narrative between the speeches, and for which in the lyric or personal form there is no occasion. To avoid making this call upon the imagination, to bring See also:home its effects with full vividness, dramatic poetry has to call in the aid of several subordinate arts, the shaping or space art of the scene-painter, the mixed time and space arts of the actor and the dancer. Occasionally also, or in the case of opera throughout, dramatic poetry heightens the emotional effect of its words with music. A play or drama is thus, as performed upon the theatre, not a poem merely, but a poem accompanied, interpreted, completed and brought several degrees nearer to reality by a combination of auxiliary effects of the other arts. Besides the narrative, the lyric and dramatic forms of poetry, the didactic, that is the teaching or expository form, has usually been recognized as a See also:fourth. Aristotle refused so to recognize it, regarding a didactic poem in the light not so much of a poem as of a useful See also:treatise. But from the Works and Days down to the Loves of the See also:Plants there has been too much literature produced in this form for us to follow Aristotle here. We shall do better to regard didactic poetry as a variety corresponding, among the speaking arts, to architecture and the other manual arts of which the first purpose is use, but which are capable of accompanying and adorning use by a pleasurable appeal to the emotions. We shall hardly make our definition of poetry, considered as an imitative art, too extended if we say that it is a speaking or time art, Definition of which the business is to express and arouse emotion by imitating or evoking all or any of the phenomena of life and of poetry. nature by means of words arranged with musical regularity. Neither the varieties of poetical form, however, nor the modes in which the several forms have been mixed up and interchanged—as Relation such mixture and interchange are implied, for instance, by the very title of a group of See also:Robert See also:Browning's poems, of poetry_ the Dramatic Lyrics,—the observation of neither of these Was art things concerns us here so much as the observation of the to paint- relations of poetry in general, as an art of representation ingand or imitation, to the other arts of imitation, painting and sculpture. sculpture. Verbal signs have been invented for in- numerable things which cannot be imitated or represented at all either in solid form or upon a coloured surface. You cannot carve or paint a sigh, or the feeling which finds utterance in a sigh; you can only suggest the idea of the feeling, and that in a somewhat imperfect and uncertain way, by representing the physical aspect of a person in the act of breathing the sigh. Similarly you cannot carve or paint any movement, but only figures or groups in which the movement is represented as arrested in some particular point of time; nor any abstract idea, but only figures or groups in which the abstract idea, as for example See also:release, captivity, See also:mercy, is symbolized in the concrete shape of allegorical or illustrative figures. The whole field of thought, of propositions, arguments, injunctions and exhortations is open to poetry but closed to sculpture and painting. Poetry, by its command over the regions of the understanding,-of See also:abstraction, of the movement and succession of things in time, by its power of instantaneously associating one image with another from the remotest regions of the mind, by its names for every shade of feeling and experience, exercises a sovereignty a hundred times more extended than that of either of the two arts of manual imitation. But, on the other hand, words do not as a rule bear any sensible resemblance to the things of which they are the signs. There are few things that words do not stand for or cannot call up; but they stand for things symbolically and at second hand, and call them up only in idea, and not :n actual presentment to the senses. In strictness, the business of poetry should not be called imitation at all, but rather evocation. The strength of painting and sculpture lies in this, that though there are countless phenomena which they cannot represent at all, and countless more which they can only represent by symbolism and suggestion more or Iess ambiguous, yet there are a few which each can represent more fully and directly than poetry can represent any thing at all. These are, for sculpture, the forms or configurations of things, which that art represents directly to the senses both of sight and See also:touch; and for painting the forms and colours of things and their relations to each other in space, See also:air and light, which the art represents to the sense of sight, directly so far as regards surface appearance, and indirectly so far as regards solidity. For many delicate qualities and See also:differences in these visible relations of things there are no words at all—the vocabulary of colours, for instance, is in all languages surprisingly scanty and primitive. And those visible qualities ,for which words exist, the words still call up in-distinctly and at second hand. Poetry is almost as powerless to bring before the mind's eye with precision a particular shade of red or See also:blue, a particular linear arrangement or harmony of colour-tones, as sculpture is to relate a continuous experience, or painting to en-force an exhortation or embellish an abstract proposition. The See also:wise poet, as has been justly remarked, when he wants to produce a vivid impression of a visible thing, does not attempt to See also:catalogue or describe its stationary beauties. Shakespeare, when he wants to make us realize the perfections of Perdita, puts into the mouth of Florizel, not, as a See also:bad poet would have done, a description of herlilies and carnations, and the other charms which a painter could make us realize better, but the praises of her ways and movements; and with the final touch, " When you do See also:dance, I wish you A See also:wave o' the See also:sea, that you might ever do Nothing but that," he evokes a twofold image of beauty in motion, of which one half might be the despair of those painters who designed the dancing maidens of the walls of See also:Herculaneum, and the other half the despair of all artists who in modern times have tried to fix upon their canvas the buoyancy and See also:grace of dancing waves. In representing the perfections of form in a See also:bride's slender foot, the speaking art, poetry, would find itself distanced by either of the shaping arts, painting or sculpture. Suckling calls up the charm of such a foot by describing it not at rest but in motion, and in the feet which " Beneath the See also:petticoat, Like little mice, went in and out," leaves us an image which baffles the power of the other arts. See also:Keats, when he tells of Madeline unclasping her jewels on St See also:Agnes's See also:Eve, does not attempt to conjure up their lustre to the eye, as a painter would have done, and a less poetical poet might have tried to do, but in the words her warmed jewels " evoked instead a quality, breathing of the very life of the wearer, which painting could ,not even have remotely suggested. The differences between the means and capacities of representation proper to the shaping arts of sculpture and painting and those proper to the speaking art of poetry were for a long while overlooked or misunderstood. The See also:maxim of See also:Simonides, General that poetry is a kind of articulate painting, and painting law ofthe a kind of See also:mute poetry, was vaguely accepted until the relative days of See also:Lessing, and first overthrown by the famous means and treatise of that writer on the See also:Laocoon. Following in the capacities main the lines laid down by Lessing, other writers have often worked out the conditions of representation or imitation several imitative proper not only to sculpture and painting as distinguished arts: from poetry, but to sculpture as distinguished from sculpture. painting. The chief points established may really all be condensed under one simple law, that the more direct and complete the imitation effected by any art, the less is the range and number of phenomena which that art can imitate. Thus sculpture in the round imitates its objects much more completely and directly than any other single art, reproducing one whole set of their relations which no other art attempts to reproduce at all, namely, their solid relations in space. Precisely for this reason, such sculpture is limited to a narrow class of objects. As we have seen, it must represent human or animal figures; nothing else has enough either of universal interest or of organic beauty and perfection. Sculpture in the round must represent such figures standing free in full clearness and detachment, in combinations and with accessories comparatively simple, on pain of teasing the eye with a complexity and entanglement of masses and lights and shadows; and in attitudes comparatively quiet, on pain of violating, or appearing to violate, the conditions of mechanical stability. Being a stationary or space-art, it can only represent a single action, which it fixes and perpetuates for ever; and it must therefore choose for that action one as significant and full of interest as is consistent with due observation of the above laws of simplicity and stability. Such actions, and the facial expressions accompanying them, should not be those of See also:sharp crisis or transition, because sudden movement or flitting expression, thus arrested and perpetuated in full and solid imitation by bronze or marble, would be displeasing and not pleasing to the spectator. They must be actions and expressions in some degree settled, collected and capable of continuance, and in their collectedness must at the same time suggest to the spectator as much as possible of the circumstances which have led up to them and those which will next ensue. These conditions evidently bring within a very narrow range the phenomena with which this art can See also:deal, and explain why, as a matter of fact, the greater number of statues represent simply a single figure in repose, with the addition of one or two symbolic or customary attributes. Paint a statue (as the greater part both of Greek and Gothic statuary was in fact painted), and you bring it to a still further point of imitative completeness to the eye; but you do not thereby lighten the restrictions laid upon the art by its material, so long as it undertakes to reproduce in full the third or solid dimension of bodies. You only begin to lighten its restrictions when you begin to relieve it of that duty. We have traced how sculpture in relief, which is satisfied with only a partial See also:reproduction of the third dimension, is free to introduce a larger range of objects, bringing forward secondary figures and accessories, indicating distant planes, indulging even in considerable violence and complexity of motion, since limbs attached to a background do not alarm the spectator by any idea of danger of fragility. But sculpture in the round has not this See also:licence. It is true that the art has at various periods made efforts to See also:escape from its natural limitations. Several of the later schools of antiquity, especially that of Pergamus in the 3rd and 2nd centuries B.C., strove hard both for violence of expression and complexity of design, not only in relief-sculptures, like the great See also:altar-friezes now at See also:Berlin, but in detached groups, such as (See also:pace Lessing) the Laocoon itself. Many modern virtuosi of sculpture since See also:Bernini have misspent their IO skill in trying to fix in marble both the restlessness of momentary actions and the flimsiness of fluttering tissues. In latter days Auguste See also:Rodin, an innovating master with a real genius for his art, has attacked many problems of complicated grouping, more or less in the nature of the Greek symplegmata, but keeps these interlocked or contorted actions circumscribed within strict limiting lines, so that they do not by jutting or straggling suggest a kind of acrobatic See also:challenge to the laws of gravity. The same artist and others inspired by him have further sought to emancipate sculpture from the necessity of rendering form in clear and complete definition, and to enrich it with a new power of mysterious suggestion, by leaving his figures wrought in part to the highest finish and vitality of surface, while other parts (according to a precedent set in some unfinished works of Michelangelo) remain scarcely emergent from the rough-hewn or unhewn See also:block. But it may be doubted whether such experiments and expedients can permanently do much to enlarge the scope of the art. Next we arrive at painting, in which the third dimension is dismissed altogether, and nothing is actually reproduced, in full or Means and partially, except the effect made by the appearance of capacities natural objects upon the retina of the eye. The conse-. ofpaint- quence is that this art can range over distance and See also:ing. multitude, can represent complicated relations between its various figures and groups of figures, extensive back-grounds, and all those infinite subtleties of appearance in natural things which depend upon local colours and their modification in the play of light and shade and enveloping atmosphere. These last phenomena of natural things are in our experience subject to See also:change in a sense in which the substantial or solid properties of things are not so subject. Colours, shadows and atmospheric effects are naturally associated with ideas of transition, See also:mystery and evanescence. Hence painting is able to extend its range to another kind of facts over which sculpture has no power. It can suggest and perpetuate in its imitation, without See also:breach of its true laws, many classes of facts which are themselves fugitive and transitory, as a smile, the glance of an eye, a gesture of horror or of passion, the waving of See also:hair in the See also:wind, the See also:rush of horses, the strife of mobs, the whole drama of the clouds, the toss and gathering of ocean waves, even the flashing of See also:lightning across the See also:sky. Still, any long or continuous series of changes, actions or movements is quite beyond the means of this art to represent. Painting remains, in spite of its See also:comparative width of range, tied down to the inevitable conditions of a space-art: that is to say, it has to delight the mind by a harmonious variety in its effects, but by a variety apprehended not through various points of time successively, but from various points in space at the same moment. The old convention which allowed painters to indicate sequence in time by means of distribution in space, dispersing the successive episodes of a See also:story about the different parts of a single picture, has been abandoned since the early Renaissance; and See also:Wordsworth sums up our modern view of the matter when he says that it is the business of painting " to give To one blest moment snatched from fleeting time The appropriate See also:calm of blest eternity." Lastly, a really unfettered range is only attained by the art which does not give a full and complete reproduction of any natural fact Means and at all, but evokes or brings natural facts before the mind means merely by the images which words convey. The whole 011'67. capacities world of movement, of continuity, of cause and effect, of the successions, alternations and interaction of events, characters and passions of everything that takes time to happen and time to declare, is open to poetry as it is open to no other art. As an imitative or, more properly speaking, an evocative art, then, poetry is subject to no limitations except those which spring from the poverty of human language, and from the fact that its means of imitation are indirect. Poetry's account of the visible properties of things is from these causes much less full, accurate and efficient than the reproduction or delineation of the same properties by sculpture and painting. And this is the sum of the conditions concerning the respective functions of the three arts of imitation which had been overlooked, in theory at least, until the time of Lessing. To the above law, in the form in which we have expressed it, it may perhaps be objected that the acted drama is at once the most The acted full and complete reproduction of nature which we owe to the fine arts, and that at the same time the number of de acted real facts over which its imitation ranges is the greatest. reception The answer is that our law applies to the several arts to the only in that which we may call their pure or unmixed general state. Dramatic poetry is in that state only when it is law, read or spoken like any other kind of See also:verse. When it is witnessed on the stage, it is in a mixed or impure state; the art of the actor has been called in to give actual reproduction to the gestures and utterances of the personages, that of the costumier to their appearances and attire, that of the stage_ decorator to their furniture and surroundings, that of the scene-painter to imitate to the eye the dwelling-places and landscapes among which they move; and only by the combination of all these subordinate arts does the drama gain its character of imitative completeness or reality. Throughout the above account of the imitative and non-imitative groups of fine arts, we have so far followed Aristotle as to allow the name of imitation to all recognizable representation or evocation of realities,—using the word " realities " in no metaphysical sense, but to signify the myriad phenomena of life and experience, whether as they actually and literally exist to-day, or as they may have existed in the past, or may be conceived to exist in some other world not too unlike our own for us to conceive and realize in thought. When we find among the ruins of a Greek temple the statue of a beautiful young man at rest, or above the altar of a See also:Christian church the painting of one transfixed with arrows, we know that the statue is intended to bring to our minds no mortal youth, but the god See also:Hermes or See also:Apollo, the trans-fixed victim no simple See also:captive, but See also:Sebastian the See also:holy See also:saint. At the same time we none the less know that the figures in either case have been studied by the artist from living models before his eyes. In like manner, in all the representations alike of sculpture, painting and poetry the things and persons represented may bear symbolic meanings and imaginary names and characters; they may be set in a See also:land of dreams, and grouped in relations and circumstances upon which the See also:sun of this world never shone; in point of fact, through many ages of history they have been chiefly used to embody human ideas of supernatural powers; but it is from real things and persons that their lineaments and characters have been taken in the first instance, in order to be attributed by the imagination to another and more exalted order of existences. The law which we have last laid down is a law defining the relations of sculpture, painting and poetry, considered simply as arts having their See also:foundations at any rate in reality, and drawing from imitation the imitation of reality their indispensable elements and by materials. It is a law defining the range and character necesof those elements or materials in nature which each art is saryan best fitted, by its special means and resources, to imitate. idealized But we must remember that, even in this fundamental imitation. part of its operations, none of these arts proceeds by imitation or evocation pure and simple. None of them con-tents itself with seeking to represent realities, however literally taken, exactly as those realities are. A portrait in sculpture or painting, a landscape in painting, a passage of local description in poetry, may be representations of known things taken literally or for their own sakes, and not for the sake of carrying out thoughts to the unknown; but none of them ought to be, or indeed can possibly be, a representation of all the observed parts and details of such a reality on equal terms and without omissions. Such a representation, were it possible, would be a mechanical See also:inventory and not a work of fine art. Hence the value of a pictorial imitation is by no means necessarily in proportion to the number of facts which it records. Many accomplished pictures, in which all the resources of line, colour and light-and-shade have been used to the utmost of Compietethe artist's power for the imitationt of all that he could see nessnot in nature, are dead and worthless in comparison with a the test few faintly touched outlines or lightly laid shadows or of avaiue tints of another artist who could see nature more vitally ktorial and better. Unless the painter knows how to choose and mitation. combine the elements of his finished work so that it shall contain in every part suggestions. and delights over and above the mere imitation, it will fall short, in that which is the essential charm of fine art, not only of any scrap of a great master's handiwork, such as an outline See also:sketch of a See also:child by See also:Raphael or a colour sketch of a See also:boat or a See also:mackerel by See also:Turner, but even of any scrap of the merest journeyman's handiwork produced by an artistic race, such as the first Japanese drawing in which a water-See also:flag and See also:kingfisher, or a spray of See also:peach or See also:almond blossom across the sky, is dashed in with a mere hint of colour, but a hint that tells a whole See also:tale to the imagination. That only, we know, is fine art which affords keen and permanent delight to contemplation. Such delight the artist can never communicate by the display of a callous and pedantic impartiality in presence of the facts of life and nature. His representation of realities will only strike or impress others in so far as it concentrates their attention on things by which he has been struck and impressed himself. To arouse emotion, he must have felt emotion; and emotion is impossible without partiality. The artist is one who instinctively tends to modify and work upon every reality before him in conformity with some poignant and sensitive principle of preference or selection in his mind. He instinctively adds something to nature in one direction and takes away something in another, overlooking this kind of fact and insisting on that, suppressing many particulars which he holds irrelevant in order to insist on and bring into prominence others by which he is attracted and arrested. The instinct by which an artist thus prefers, selects and brings into light one order of facts or aspects in the thing before him rather than the rest, is part of what is called the idealizing or ideal faculty. Interminable discussion has been spent on the Nature questions,—What is the ideal, and how do we idealize? of the The answer has been given in one form by those thinkers idealizing (e.g. See also:Vischer and Lotze) who have pointed out that the process. process of aesthetic idealization carried on by the artist is only the I0 Things unknown shadowed forth by imitation of things known. higher development of a process carried on in an elementary fashion by all men, from the very nature of their constitution. The physical See also:organs of sense themselves do not retain or put on record all the impressions made upon them. When the nerves of the eye receive a multitude of different stimulations at once from different points in space, the sense of eyesight, instead of being aware of all these stimulations singly, only abstracts and retains a See also:total impression of them together: In like manner we are not made aware by the sense of hearing of all the several waves of sound that strike in a momentary succession upon the nerves of the ear; that sense only abstracts and retains a total impression from the combined effect of a number of such waves. And the See also:office which each sense thus performs singly for its own impressions, the mind performs in a higher degree for the impressions of all the senses equally, and for all the other parts of our experience. We are always dismissing or neglecting a great part of our impressions, and abstracting and combining among those which we retain. The ordinary human consciousness works like an artist up to this point; and when we speak of the ordinary or inartistic man as being impartial in the retention or registry of his daily impressions, we mean, of course, in the retention or registry of his impressions as already thus far abstracted and assorted in consciousness. The artistic man, whose impressions affect him much more strongly, has the faculty of carrying much farther these same processes of abstraction, combination and selection among his impressions. The possession of this faculty is the artist's most essential gift. To attempt to carry farther the psychological analysis of the gift is Sub)ec outside our present object; but it is See also:worth while to con-Sub/ec-d See also:eider somewhat closely its modes of practical operation. See also:objective One mode is this: the artist grows up with certain innate ideate or acquired predilections which become a part of his constitution whether he will or no,—predilections, say, if he is a dramatic poet, for certain types of See also:plot, character and situation; if he is a sculptor, for certain proportions and a certain habitual See also:carriage and disposition of the limbs; if he is a figure painter, for certain schemes of composition and moulds of figure and airs and expressions of countenance; if a landscape painter, for a certain class of local character, sentiment and pictorial effect in natural scenery. To such predilections he cannot choose but make his representations of reality in large measure conform. This is one part of the transmuting process which the data of life and experience have to undergo at the hands of artists, and may be called the subjective or purely personal mode of idealization. But there is another part of that work which springs froman impulse in the artistic constitution not less imperious than the last named, and in a certain sense contrary to it. As an imitator or evoker of the facts of life and nature, the artist must recognize and accept the character of those facts with which he has in any given case to deal. All facts cannot be of the cast he prefers, and in so far as he undertakes to deal with those of an opposite cast he must submit to them; he must study them as they actually are, must apprehend, enforce and bring into prominence their own dominant tendencies. If he cannot find in them what is most pleasing to himself, he will still be led by the abstracting and discriminating powers of his observation to discern what is most expressive and significant in them, he will emphasize and put on record this, idealizing the facts before him not in his direction but in their own. This is the second or objective half of the artist's task of idealization. It is this half upon which See also:Taine dwelt almost exclusively, and on the whole with a just insight into the principles of the operation, in his well-known treatise On the Ideal in Art. Both these modes of idealization are legitimate; that which springs from inborn and overmastering personal preference in the artist for particular aspects of life and nature, and that which springs from his insight into the dominant and significant character of the phenomena actually before him, and his desire to emphasize and disengage them. But there is a third mode of idealizing which is less vital and genuine than either of these, and therefore less legitimate, though unfortunately far more common. This mode consists in making things conform to a borrowed and conventional See also:standard of beauty and taste, which corresponds neither to any strong inward predilection of the artist nor to any vital characteristic in the objects of his representation. Since the rediscovery of Greek and See also:Roman sculpture in the Renaissance, a great part of the efforts of artists have been spent in falsifying their natural instincts and misrepresenting the facts of nature in pursuit of a conventional ideal of abstract and generalized beauty framed on a false conception and a shallow knowledge of the See also:antique. School after school from the 16th century downwards has been confirmed in this practice by academic See also:criticism and theory, with resulting insipidities and insincerities of performance which have commonly been acclaimed in their day, but from which later generations have sooner or later turned away with a wholesome reaction of distaste. The two genuine modes of idealization, the subjective and the objective, are not always easy to be reconciled. The greatest artist is no doubt he who can combine the strongest personal instincts of preference with the keenest power of observing characteristics as they are, yet in fact we find few in whom both these elements of the ideal faculty have been equally developed. To take an example among Florentine painters, Sandro See also:Botticelli is usually thought of as one who could never escape from the dictation of his own personal
ARTS [CLASSIFICATION
ideals, in obedience to which he is supposed to have invested all the creations of his art with nearly the same conformation of brows, lips, cheeks and See also:chin, nearly the same looks of wistful yearning and dejection. There is some truth in this Examples impression, though it is largely based on the works not of of the the master himself, but of. pupils who exaggerated his modes and mannerisms. Leonardo da `See also:Vinci was strong in both ofthetr directions; haunted in much of his work by a particular reconclliahuman ideal of intellectual sweetness and alluring tion. mystery, he has yet left us a vast number of exercises which show him as an indefatigable student of objective characteristics and psychological expressions of an order the most opposed to this. And in this case again followers have over-emphasized the master's predilections, See also:Luini, See also:Sodoma and the rest borrowing and repeating the mysterious smi;e of Leonardo till it becomes in their work an affectation cloying however lovely. Among latter-day painters, Burne-See also: Hence Shakespeare's Caliban and figures like those of Quilp and Quasimodo in the romances of See also:Dickens and See also:Hugo; hence the cynic grimness of See also:Goya's Caprices and the profound and See also:bitter impressiveness of See also:Daumier's caricatures of Parisian See also:bourgeois life; or again, in an angrier and more insulting and therefore less under-standing temper, the brutal energy of the political drawings of Gilray. Sculpture; painting and poetry, then, are among the greater fine arts those which express and arouse emotion by imitating or evoking real and known things, either for their own sakes literally, Unideaea/-or for the sake of shadowing forth things not known but icedlimagined. In either case they represent their originals, See also:tattoo not not indiscriminately as they are, but sifted, simplified, fine art. enforced and enhanced to our apprehensions partly by the artist's power of making things conform to his own instincts and preferences, partly by his other power of interpreting and emphasizing the significant characters of the facts before him. Any incitation that does not do one or other or both of these things in full measure fails in the quality of emotional expression and emotional appeal, and in so failing falls short, taken merely as imitation, of the standard of fine art. But we must remember that idealized imitation, as such, is not the whole task of these arts nor their only means of appeal. There is another part of their task, logically though not practically he a independent of the relations borne by their imitations appeal to the original phenomena of nature, and dependent on thelinlthe appeal made through the eye and ear to our primal ttaaofpve s organic sensibilities by the properties of rhythm, pattern partly on and regulated design in the arrangement of sounds, lines, non= masses, colours and light-and-shade. That appeal we imitative noted as lying at the See also:root of the art impulse in its most elements. elementary stage. In its most developed stage every fine artis bound still to play upon the same sensibilities. In a. work of sculpture the contours and interchanges of light and shadow are bound to be such as would, please the eye, whether the statue or relief represented the figure of anything real in the world or not.. The flow and balance of line, and the distribution of colours and light-and-shade, in a picture are bound to be such as would make an agreeable pattern a?though they bore no resemblance to natural fact (as, indeed, many subordinate applications of this art, in decorative painting and geometrical and other ornaments, dn. we know. alive pleasure though they represent nothing). The ARTS CLASSTFICATIONI sound of a line or verse in poetry is bound to be such as would thrill the physical ear in hearing, or the See also:mental ear in reading, with a delightful excitement even though the meaning went for nothing. If the imitative arts are to touch and elevate the emotions, if they are to afford permanent delight of the due pitch and See also:volume, it is not a more essential law that their imitation, merely as such, should be of the order which we have defined as ideal, than that they should at the same time exhibit these independent effects which they share with the non-imitative group. So far we have assumed, without asserting, the necessity that the artist in, whatever kind should possess a power of See also:execution, or technique as it is called in modern phrase, adequate Neaesslty to the task of embodying and giving ahape to his ideals. of due In thought it is possible to separate the conception of a balanne work of art from its execution; in practice it is not between possible, and half the errors in criticism and speculation conception about the fine arts spring from failing to realize that an and tech. shine: artistic conception can only be brought home tows through and by its a ro the non- Y appropriate embodiment. Whatever the artist's imitative cast of imagination or degree of sensibility may be in arts and presence of the materials of life, it is essential that he their should be able to express himself appropriately in the technique, material of his particular art. To quote the writer (R. A. M, See also:Stevenson) who has enforced this point most clearly and vividly, perhaps with some pardonable measure of over-statement: It is a sensitiveness to the special qualities of some visible or audible medium of art which distinguishes the See also:species artist from the genus man." And again: " here are as many separate faculties of imagination as there are separate mediums in which to conceive an image clay, words, paint, notes of music." " Technique differs as the material of each art differs—differs as marble, See also:pigments, musical notes and words differ. The artist who does not enjoy and has not with delighted labour mastered the effects of his own chosen medium will never be a master; the hearer, reader or spectator who cannot appreciate the qualities of skill, vitality and charm in the handling of the given material, or who fails to feel their absence when they are lacking, or who looks in one material primarily for the qualities appropriate to another, will never make a critic. The technique of the space-arts differs radically from that of the time-arts. So again do these of the imitative and the non-imitative arts differ among themselves. The non-imitative arts of music and architecture are in a certain degree alike in this, that the artist is in neither case his own executant (this at least is true of music so far as concerns its modern concerted and orchestral developments) ; the musical composer and the architect each imagines and composes a design in the medium of his own art which it is left for others to carry out under his direction. The technique in each case consists not in mastery of an instrument (though the musical composer may be, and often is, a master of some one of the instruments whose effects he in his mind's ear co-ordinates and combines) ; it lies in the power of knowing and See also:conjuring up all the emotional resources and effects of the various materials at his command, and of conceiving and designing to 'their last detail vast and ordered structures, to be raised by subordinate executants from those materials, which shall adequately express his temperament and embody his ideals. In the imitative arts, on the other hand, the sculptor, unless he is a See also:fraud, must be wholly his own executant in the original task The imita- of modelling his design in the soft material of clay or The arts wax, though he must accept the aid of assistants whether and their in the casting of his work in bronze or in first roughing technique: it out from the block in marble. Too many sculptors painting have been inclined further to trust to trained mechanical andscu _ help in See also:finishing their work with the See also:chisel; With the tore. result that the surface loses the touch which is the ex- pression of personal temperament and, personal feeling for the relations of his material to nature. The artist in love with the vital qualities of form, or those. of his own handiwork in expressing such qualities-- in modelling-clay, will never stop until he learns how to translate them for himself in marble. Proceeding to that imitative art which leaves out the third dimension of nature, and by so doing enormously increases the range of objects and effects which come within its power—proceeding to the art of painting, the painter is in theory exclusively his own executant, and in practice mainly so, though in certain schools and periods the great artists have been accustomed to surround themselves with pupils to whom they have imparted their methods and who have helped them in the subordinate and preparatory parts of their work. But the painter See also:fit to See also:teach and lead can by no means escape the necessity of being himself a master of his material, and his handling of it must needs bear the immediate impress of his temperament. His emotional preferences among the visible facts of nature, his feeling for the relative importance and charm of line, colour, light and shade, used whether for the interpretation and heightening of natural fact or for producing a pattern in itself harmonious and suggestive to the eye, his sense of the special modes of handling most effective for communicating the impression he desires, all these together inevitably appear in, and constitute, his style and technique. If he is careless or inexpert or conventional, or See also:cold or without delight, in technique, though he may be animated by the' noblest purposes369 and the loftiest ideas, he is a failure as a painter. At certain periods in the history of painting, as in the 13th and 14th centuries in See also:Italy, the technique seems indeed to modern eyes wholly immature; but that was because there were many aspects of visible things which the art had not yet attempted or desired to portray, not because it did not put forthwith delight its best traditional or newly acquired skill in portraying the special aspects with which it had so far attempted to grapple. At certain other periods, as in the later 16th and 17th centuries in the same See also:country, the elements of inherited technical facility and academic pride of skill outweigh the sincerity and freshness of interest taken in the aspects of things to be portrayed, and the true balance is lost. At other times, as in much of the work of the 19th century, especially in See also:England, painters have been diverted from their true task, and lost hold of intelligent and living technique altogether, in trying to please a public blind to the special qualities of their art, and prone to seek in it the effects, frivolous or serious, which are appropriate not to paint and canvas but to literature. Lastly, the poet and See also:literary artist must obviously be the exclusive master of his own technique. No one can help him: all depends on the keenness of his double sensibility to the thrill of life Technique and to that of words, and to his power of maintaining a is poetry: just balance between the two. If he is truly and organic- ally the magic sensitive to words alone, and has learnt life only oiwotbs. through their medium and not through the energies of his own imagination, nor through personal sensibility to the impact of things and thoughts and passions and experience, then his work may be a See also:miracle of accomplished verbal music, and may entrance the ear for the moment, but will never live to illuminate and sustain and See also:console. If, on the other hand, he has imagination and sensibility in full measure, and lacks the inborn love of and gift for words and their magic, he will be but a dumb or See also:stammering poet all his days. There is no better witness on this point than Wordsworth. His own. prolonged lapses from verbal felicity, and continual See also:habit of See also:solemn meditation on themes not always inspiring, might make us hesitate to choose him as an example of that particular love and gift. But Wordsworth could never have risen to his best and greatest self had he not truly possessed the sensibilities which he attributes to himself in the Prelude: " Twice five years Or less I might have seen, when first my mind With conscious pleasure opened to the charm Of words in tuneful order, found them sweet For their own sakes, a passion, and a power; And phrases pleased me chosen for delight, For pomp, or love." And again, expressing better 'than any one else the relation which words in true poetry hold to things, he writes:' " Visionary power Attends the motions of the viewless winds, Embodied in the mystery of words; There darkness makes See also:abode, and all the See also:host Of shadowy things work endless changes,—there, As in a See also:mansion like their proper home, Even forms and substances are circumfused By that transparent veil with light divine, And, through the turnings intricate of verse, Present themselves as objects recognized, In flashes, and with See also:glory not their own." 3. The Serviceable and the Non-Serviceable Arts.—It has been established from the outset that, though the essential distinction of fine art as such is to minister not to material necessity or Tltird practical use, but to delight, yet there are some among the hir iica arts of men which do both these things at once and are ;See also:ion: the arts of direct use and of beauty or emotional appeal serviceable together. Under this classification a survey of the field and the of art at different periods of history would yield different nom_ results. In ruder times, we have seen, the utilitarian aim serviceable was still the predominant aim of art, and most of what art, we now call fine arts served in the beginning to fulfil the practical needs of individual and social life; and this not only among primitive or savage races. In ancient Egypt and Assyria the primary purpose of the relief-sculptures on See also:palace and temple walls was the practical one of historical record and commemoration. Even as See also:late as the middle ages and early Renaissance the primary business of the painter was to give instruction to the unlearned in See also:Bible history and in the lives of the See also:saints, and to rouse him to moods of religious and ethical exaltation. The pleasures of fine art proper among the manual-imitative group—the pleasures, namely, of producing and contemplating certain arrangements rather than others of design, proportion, pattern, colour and light and shade, and of putting forth and appreciating certain qualities of skill, truth and significance in idealized imitation,—these were, historically speaking, by-products that arose gradually in the course of practice and development. As time went on, the conscious aim of ministering to such pleasures displaced and threw into the background the utilitarian ends for which the arts had originally ' been practised, and the pleasures became ends in themselves. But even in advanced societies the double qualities of use and beauty still remain inseparable, among the five greater arts, in architecture. We build in the first instance for the sake of Among the necessary shelter and accommodation, or for the See also:corn- greater memoration, propitiation or worship of spiritual powers on arts, whom we believe our welfare to depend. By and by we architec- find out that the aspect of our constructions is pleasurable tore one or the reverse. Architecture is the art of building at once exists primarily as we need and as we like, and a practical treatise on for architecture must treat the beauty and the. utility of service. buildings as bound up together. But for our present purpose it has been proper to take into account one half only of the vocation of architecture, the half by which it impresses, gives delight and belongs to that which is the subject of our study, to fine art; and to neglect the other half of its vocation, by which it belongs to what is not the subject of our study, to useful or mechanical art. It is plain, however, that the presence or absence of this See also:foreign element, the element of practical utility, constitutes a See also:fair ground for a new and separate classification of the fine arts. )If we took the five greater arts as they exist in modern times by themselves, architecture would on this ground stand alone in one division, as the directly useful or serviceable fine art; with sculpture, painting, music and poetry together in the other division, as fine arts unassociated with such use or service. Not that the divisions would, even thus, be quite sharply and absolutely separated. Didactic poetry, we have already acknowledged, is a See also:branch of the poetic art which aims at practice and utility. Again, the hortatory and patriotic kinds of lyric poetry, from the strains of See also:Tyrtaeus to those of See also:Arndt or Rouget de See also:Lisle or Wordsworth's sonnets written in war-time, may fairly be said to belong to a phase of fine art which aims directly at one of the highest utilities, the stimulation of patriotic feeling ' and self-devotion. So may the strains of music which accompany such poetry. The same practical character, as stimulating and attuning the mind to definite ends and actions, might indeed have been claimed for the greater part of the whole art of music as that art was practised in antiquity, when each of several prescribed and highly elaborated moods, or modes, of melody was supposed to have a known effect upon the courage and moral temper of the hearer. Compare See also:Milton, when he tells of the Dorian mood of flutes and soft recorders which assuaged the sufferings and renewed the courage of Satan and his legions as they marched through See also:hell. In modern music, of which the elements, much more complex in themselves than those of ancient music, have the effect of stirring our See also:fibres to moods of rapturous contemplation rather than of action, military strains in See also: To this vast group of workmen, whose work is at the same time useful and fine in its degree, the ancient Greek gave the place which is most just and convenient for thought, when he classed. them all together under the name. of rieroees, or artificers, and called; the builder by the name of ttpXtrEKrws, arch-artificer or artificer-inchief. Modern usage has adopted the phrase " arts and crafts " as a convenient general name for their pursuits. . Students of human culture have concentrated a great 'deal of attentive thought upon the history of fine art,; and have, put forth various comprehensive generalizations intended at once to sum up and to account for the phases and vicissitudes of that history. The most famous formulae are those of Hegel, who regarded particular arts as being characteristic of and appropriate to particular forms of See also:civilization and particular ages of history. For him, architecture was the symbolic art appropriate to ages of obscure and struggling ideas, and characteristic of the Egyptian' and the See also:Asiatic races of old and of the medieval age in Europe. Sculpture was the classical art appropriate to ages of lucid and self-possessed ideas, and characteristic of the Greek and Roman See also:period. Painting, music and poetry were the romantic 'arts, appropriate to the ages of complicated and overmastering ideas, and characteristic of modern humanity in general. In the working out of these generalizations Hegel brought together a mass of judicious and striking observations; and that they contain on the whole a preponderance of truth may be admitted. It has been objected against them, from the philosophical point of view, that they too much mix up the definition of what the several arts theoretically are with considerations of what in various historical circumstances they have practically been. From the historical point of view there can be taken what seems a more valid objection, that these formulae of Hegel tend too much to fix the attention of the student upon the one dominant art chosen as characteristic of any period, and to give him false ideas of the proportions and relations of the several arts at the same period—of the proportions and relations which poetry, say, really bore to sculpture among the Greeks and See also:Romans, or sculpture to architecture among the Christian nations of the middle age. The truth is, that the historic survey gained over any field of human activity from the height of generalizations so vast in scope as these are must needs, in the complexity of earthly affairs, be a survey too distant to give much guidance until its omissions are filled up by a great deal of nearer study; and such nearer study is See also:apt to compel the student in the- long run to qualify the theories with which he has started until they are in danger of disappearing altogether. Another systematic exponent of the universe, whose system is very different from that of Hegel, Herbert Spencer, brought the doctrine of evolution to bear, not without interest- Herbert ing results, upon the history of the fine arts and their Spencer development. Herbert Spencer set forth how the and the manual group of fine arts, architecture, sculpture eyolutlon and painting, were in their first rudiments bound up theory. together, and how each of them in the course of history has liberated itself from the rest by a See also:gradual process of separation. These arts did not at first exist in the distinct and developed forms in which we have above described them. There were no statues in the round, and no painted panels or canvases hung upon the See also:wall. Only the rudiments of sculpture and painting existed, and that only as ornaments applied to architecture, in the shape of tiers of tinted reliefs, representing in a kind of picture-See also:writing the exploits of See also:kings upon the walls of their temple-palaces. Gradually sculpture took greater salience and roundness, and tended to disengage itself from the wall, while painting found out how to represent solidity by means of its own, and dispensed with the raised surface upon which it was first applied. But the old mixture and union of the three arts, with an undeveloped art of painting and an undeveloped art of sculpture still engaged in or applied to the `works of architecture, continued on the whole to prevail through the long cycles of Egyptian and Assyrian history. In the Egyptian I0 Other and minor arts of service sub- ordinate to architecture. Current generalizations on the . history of fine art: Hegel. Additional information and CommentsThere are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click, and select "copy." Then paste it into your website, email, or other HTML. Site content, images, and layout Copyright © 2006 - Net Industries, worldwide. |
|
[back] FINE |
[next] FINGER |