Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
See also:ROMAN See also:EMPIRE , LATER
The Heraclian See also:dynasty, which had fallen on evil times and rendered inestimable services to the Empire, came to an end in anarchy, which was terminated by the See also:elevation of the Syrian_ (commonly called Isaurian) See also:Leo III., whose reign opens a new See also:period. His reforming See also:hand was active in every See also:sphere of See also:government, but the See also:ill-fame which he won by his iconoclastic policy obscured in the memory of posterity the See also:capital importance of his See also:work. His provincial organization was revolutionary, and his legislation departed from the Roman tradition (see below). From his reign to the See also:middle of the loth See also:century the continuous warfare by See also:land with the Caliphs consisted of marauding expeditions of each See also:power into the other's territory, captures of fortresses, guerilla fighting, but no See also:great conquests or decisive battles. The efficiency of the See also:army was carefully maintained, but the neglect of the See also:navy led to the losses of See also:Crete (conquered by Moslem adventurers from See also:Spain 826) and See also:Sicily (conquered by the See also:Saracens of See also:Africa), Panormus taken 832, See also:Syracuse 878 (see SICILY). ,The Africans also made temporary conquests, including See also:Bari, in See also:south See also:Italy. This period saw the loss of the exarchate of See also:Ravenna to the See also:Lombards (750), the expansion of the Frankish power under See also:Pippin and See also:Charlemagne in Italy, and in See also:close connexion therewith the loss of Old See also:Rome.
The inconoclast emperors pursued a moderate See also:foreign policy, consolidating the Empire within its contracted limits; but under the " Macedonian " dynasty, which was of Armenian descent, it again See also:expanded and became the strongest power in See also:Europe. The 9th century also witnessed a revival of learning and culture which had been in See also:eclipse for 200 years. The reign of See also:Basil I. was marked by an energetic policy in south Italy, where his forces co-operated with the western See also:emperor See also: Leo VI. did much for reorganizing the navy, but his reign was not fortunate; Saracen pirates plundered freely in the See also:Aegean and, under the able renegade Leo of Tripolis, captured Thessalonica and carried off countless captives (904). But a great See also:tide of success began fifty.years later. Nicephorus See also:Phocas won back Crete (961) as See also:general of See also:Romanus II., and then as emperor recovered See also:Cilicia and See also:North See also:Syria (with See also:Antioch) 968. See also:Cyprus was also recovered. The tide flowed on under his equally able successor, See also: The See also:conversion was contemporary with the work of the two missionaries See also:Cyril and See also:Methodius, who (while the See also: Thus the Mahommedans definitely cut the Empire See also:short in the See also:East, as the Germans had cut it short in the See also:West; Egypt was never recovered, Syria only for short periods and partially, while the integrity of Asia See also:Minor was constantly menaced and Cilicia occupied for many generations. By their conquest of See also:Persia the Caliphs succeeded to the position of the Sassanids; this led to the conquest of Armenia (c. 654); while, in the West, Africa was occupied in 647 (though the See also:con-quest was not completed till the See also:capture of See also:Carthage and other strong places in 698). Thus within twenty years from the first attack the Empire was girt about by the new aggressive p \\er from the precincts of the See also:Caucasus to the western Mediterranean. Fortunately See also:Constans II., See also:grandson of Heraclius, was a See also:man of eminent ability and firmness. The state owed to him the preservation of Asia Minor, and the creation of a powerful See also:fleet (see below) which protected the Aegean coasts and islands against the See also:naval power which the Mahommedans created. He was responsible for completing a new, efficient military organization, which determined the lines of the administrative reforms of Leo III. (see below). In his last years he turned his eyes to Italy and Africa. He dreamed of restoring Old Rome as the centre of the Empire. But he did not succeed in recovering south Italy from the Lombards (Duchy of Beneventum), and having visited Rome he took up his See also:residence in Syracuse, where he was assassinated, having lost two fleets which he sent against the See also:Arabs of Africa. The See also:strain lasted for another fifty years. Constantinople sustained two great sieges, which stand out as crises, for, if in either See also:case the enemy had been successful, the Empire was doomed.
The first See also:siege was in 673-77, under the See also:caliph Moawiya; his fleet blockaded the capital for five years, but all its efforts were frustrated by the able precautions of Constantine IV.; " Greek fire " (see below) played an important See also:part in the See also:defence; and the See also:armada was annihilated on the voyage back to Syria by storms and the Roman fleet. The second crisis was at the See also:accession of Leo III., when the See also:city was besieged by land and See also:sea by See also:Suleiman for a year (717-18), and Leo's brilliant defence, again aided by Greek fire, saved Europe. This crisis marks the highest point of Mahommedan aggression, which never again caused the Empire to tremble for its existence.
See also:Pannonia) laid the south-eastern Slays under a deep See also:debt bjr inventing the Glagolitic (q.v.), not the so-called " See also:Cyrillic " See also:alphabet (based on Greek cursive) and translating parts of the Scriptures into Slavonic (the See also:dialect of the Slays of See also:Macedonia). The most brilliant period of the old Bulgarian kingdom was the reign of See also:Simeon (893-927), who extended the See also:realm west-See also: Some Bulgarian See also:noble families and members of the royal See also:house were incorporated in the Greek nobility; there was Shishmanid See also:blood in the families of See also:Comnenus and See also:Ducas. Greek domination was now established in the See also:peninsula for more than 150 years. The Slays of See also:Greece had in the middle of the 9th century been brought under the See also:control of the government. In the reign of Basil II. the See also:Russian question also was settled. The Russian state (see See also:Russia) had been founded before the middle of the 9th century by Norsemen from See also:Sweden, who were known in eastern Europe as Russians ('Pc ), with its centres at See also:Novgorod and See also:Kiev. They did for the eastern Slays what the Bulgarians had done for the Slays of Moesia. The See also:Dnieper and See also:Dniester gave them See also:access to the Euxine, and the Empire was. exposed to their maritime attacks (Constantinople was in extreme danger in 86o and 941), which recall the See also:Gothic expeditions of the 3rd century. In 945 a commercial treaty was concluded, and the visit of the princess See also:Olga to Byzantium (towards the end of the reign of the learned emperor Constantine VII., Porphyrogennetos) and her See also:baptism seemed a See also:pledge of peace. But Olga's conversion had no results. Sviatoslav occupied Bulgaria and threatened the Empire, but was decisively defeated by Zimisces (971), and this was virtually the end of the struggle. In 988 Prince See also:Vladimir captured Cherson, but restored it to the emperor Basil, who gave him his See also:sister See also:Anna in See also:marriage, and he accepted Christianity for himself and his people. After this conversion and See also:alliance, Byzantium had little to fear from Kiev, which came under its influence. One hostile expedition (1043) indeed is recorded, but-it was a failure. Much about the same time that the Russians had founded their state, the See also:Magyars (see See also:HUNGARY; the Greeks called them See also:Turks) migrated westward and occupied the regions between the Dnieper and the Danube, while beyond them, pressing on their heels, were another new people, the See also:Petchenegs (Patzinaks). The policy of Byzantium was to make use of the Magyars as a check on the Bulgarians, and so we find the Romans (under Leo VI.) and the Magyars co-operating against the tsar Simeon. But Simeon played the same See also:game more effectively by using the Petchenegs against the Magyars, and the result was that the Magyars before the end of the 9th century were forced to move westward into their present country, and their See also:place was taken by the Petchenegs. From their new seats the Magyars could invade the Empire and threatened the See also:coast towns of See also:Dalmatia. The conquest of Bulgaria made the Petchenegs immediate neighbours of the Empire, and during the lrth century the depredations of these irreclaimable savages, who filtered into the See also:Balkan peninsula, constantly preoccupied the government. In 1064 they were driven from the Dniester regions into Little See also:Walachia by the Kumans (or Polovtsi), a people of the same ethnical See also:group as themselves. They werecrushingly defeated by Alexius Comnenus in ro91, and exterminated by John Comnenus in 1123. In the Macedonian period a See also:grave domestic question troubled the government. This was the growth of the large estates of the See also:rich nobles of Asia Minor, at the expense of small properties, to an excess which was politically and economically dangerous. The legislation against the evil began under Romanus I. and was directed to the defence of the poor against the rich, and to protecting the military organization which was based on holdings of land to which the See also:obligation of military service was attached. There was also danger in the excessive influence of rich and powerful families, from which the great military See also:officers were See also:drawn, and which were extensively related by alliances among themselves. The danger was realized in the struggle which Basil II. had to sustain with the families of Sclerus and Phocas. Various kinds of legislation were at-tempted. Under Romanus I. alienation of See also:property to the large landowners was forbidden. Nicephorus Phocas, whose sympathies were with the See also:aristocracy to which he belonged, holding that there had been enough legislation in favour of the poor, sought to meet the difficulty of maintaining a See also:supply of military lands in the future by forbidding further acquisitions of estates by the Church. Basil II. returned to the policy of Romanus, but, with much greater severity, resorting to See also:confiscation of some of the immense private estates; and he endeavoured to keep down the aristocrats of Asia Minor by very heavy See also:taxation. Through the recovery of the Balkan provinces he gained in Europe a certain political counterpoise to the influence of Asia Minor, which had been preponderant since the seventh century. Asia Minor meant the army, and opposition to its influence expressed itself in the lrth century in a fatal See also:anti-military policy, which is largely responsible for the conquests of a new enemy, the Seljuk Turks, who now entered into the See also:inheritance of the Caliphs (see CALIPHATE ad fin. and SELJuES). Constantinople was haunted by the dread of a military usurpation. An See also:attempt of the military See also:hero See also:George Maniaces (who had made a remarkable effort to recover Sicily) to wrest the See also:crown from Constantine IX. had failed; and when See also:Isaac Comnenus, who represented the military aristocrats of Asia Minor, ascended the See also:throne, he found himself soon compelled to abdicate, in face of the opposition. The reign of Constantine X., of the See also:rival family of Ducas, marked the culmination of this antagonism. The See also:senate was filled with men of the lower classes, and the military See also:budget was ruthlessly cut down. This policy reduced the army and stopped the supply of officers, since there was no longer See also:hope of a profitable career. The emperor thought to meet dangers from See also:external enemies by See also:diplomacy. The successes of the See also:Seljuks (after the fall of the great Armenian fortress of See also:Ani in ro64) at length awoke the government from its See also:dream of See also:security. The general Romanus See also:Diogenes was proclaimed emperor. He had to create an army and to See also:train it; he did not spare himself, but it was too See also:late. He was defeated and captured by See also:Alp Arslan on the decisive field of Manzikert (1071). Released by the See also:sultan, who honoured his bravery, he was deposed in favour of Michael Ducas, and falling into the hands of his enemies, was blinded. The east and centre of Asia Minor were thus lost; the Seljuk kingdom of See also:Rum was founded; See also:Nicaea was captured by the Turks in ro80. The provinces which escaped the Seljuk occupation were thoroughly disorganized, a See also:prey to foreign and native adventurers and usurpers (see SELJUKS). Thus in the 'seventies of the rrth century the Empire seemed through incompetence and frivolity to have been brought to the See also:verge of See also:dissolution. The disorder was terminated by the accession of the extraordinarily able statesman Alexius Comnenus (ro8r), who effected a reconciliation with the rival family of Ducas, established a strong government and founded a dynasty. He had to See also:deal with three great dangers—the Seljuks, the Petchenegs (see above), and in the west the See also:Normans. The Normans had wrested from East Rome its possessions in South Italy (1041–71; see NoRMANs)—succeeding where See also:German emperors had failed—and throughout the Comnenian period the Empire was threatened by their projects of conquest beyond the Adriatic, projects which aimed at Constantinople itself. Four great attempts against the Empire were made by the
Normans; they were unsuccessful, but they heralded the Western conquest of 1204. (I) Expedition of See also:Robert Guiscard, Io81-85, repelled by Alexius with help of See also:Venice (2) Bohemond's expedition, 1105-7, foiled by the able See also:strategy of Alexius; (3) the invasion of Greece by See also:Roger of Sicily, 1147; Venice supported See also:Manuel Comnenus, and the Normans were driven from See also:Corfu, 1149 (4) the expedition of See also: The See also:history of the new relations between East and West dating from the First Crusade is closely connected with the history of the futile attempts at bringing about a See also:reunion between the Greek and Latin Churches, which had severed communion in 1054 (see below). To heal the See also:schism and bring the GI eek Church under the domination of Rome was a See also:principal See also:object of papal policy from See also:Gregory VII. forward. The popes alternated between two methods for attaining this, as circumstances dictated: namely, a peaceful agreement—the policy of See also:union; or an armed occupation of the Empire by some western power (the Normans)—the policy of conquest. Their views varied according to the vicissitudes of their political situation and their struggles with the western emperors. The eastern emperors were also constantly preoccupied with the See also:idea of reconciliation, constantly negotiating with a view to union; but they did not care about it for its own See also:sake, but only for political advantages which it might bring, and their subjects were bitterly opposed to it. Manuel Comnenus during the first part of his reign was the close friend and ally of the western emperor See also:Conrad III., but after Conrad's death, he formed the ambitious See also:plan of realizing in Europe a See also:sovereignty like that of Justinian, and hoped to See also:compass it in See also:conjunction with Rome, the enemy of the See also:Hohenstaufen. His forward policy carried war into Italy; he seized See also:Ancona. But his strength was unequal to such designs. His Latin sympathies, no less than his See also:financial extravagance, made him highly unpopular athome; and the national lack of sympathy with his Western policy was exhibited—after the revolution which overthrew his son Alexius and raised his See also:cousin Andronicus I. to the throne —by the awful See also:massacre of the Latin residents at Constantinople in I182, for which the expedition of William of Sicily (see above) and the massacre of the people of Thessalonica was the revenge. The short reign of the wicked and brilliant Andronicus was in all respects a reaction, prudent, economical and popular. His fall was due to the aristocracy against whom his policy was directed, and the reign of Isaac See also:Angelus undid his efforts and completed the ruin of the state. Oppressive taxation caused a revolt of the Bulgarian and Walachian See also:population in the See also:European provinces; the work of Zimisces and Basil was undone, and a new Bulgarian kingdom was founded by John Asen—a decisive See also:blow to the Greek predominance which the Macedonian emperors seemed to have established. In the fatal year 1204 the perils with which the eastward expansion of western Christendom (the Crusades, and the commercial predominance and ambitions of Venice) had long menaced the Empire, culminated in its conquest and See also:partition. It was due to a See also:series of accidents that the See also:cloud burst at this moment, but the conditions of such a See also:catastrophe had long been present. Isaac Angelus was dethroned by his See also:brother Alexius III., and his son escaped (1201) to the west, where arrangements were being made for a new crusade, which Venice undertook to transport to the Holy Land. The prince persuaded See also: But he was hampered from the beginning by dependence on Venice, want of financial resources, and want of a fleet; the feudal princes, occupied with their separate interests, gave him little support in his conflict with Greeks and Bulgarians; at the end of ten years the worthless fabric began rapidly to decline, and the efforts of the popes, for whom it was the means of realizing Roman supremacy in the East, were unavailing to See also:save it from the extinction to which it was doomed in its See also:cradle. The See also:original See also:Act of Partition (which gave 4 of the Byzantine territory to the future emperor, 1 to Venice, the remaining S to the Crusaders) could hardly be carried out strictly, as the territory was still to be won. The most important See also:vassal state was the kingdom of Thessalonica, including See also:Thessaly, which was assigned to Boniface of Montferrat. But it was conquered by the Greeks of See also:Epirus in 1222. The See also:chief of the territories taken by Venice was Crete. For the Latin states in Greece and the Aegean see GREECE. The first Latin emperor, See also:Baldwin of See also:Flanders, was captured and put to death by the Bulgarians in 1205. He was succeeded by his brother Henry, an able statesman, after whose death (1216) the decline began. Three Greek states emerged from the ruin of the Roman Empire. A member of the Comnenian house had founded an independent state at See also:Trebizond, and this empire survived till 1461, when it was conquered by the Ottomans. A relation of the Angeli maintained in Europe an independent Greek state known as the Despotate of Epirus. But the true representative of the imperial See also:line was See also:Theodore See also:Lascaris, who collected the Byzantine aristocracy at Nicaea and was elected emperor in 1206. He and his successors advanced surely and rapidly against the Latin Empire, both in Europe and Asia. It was a question whether Constantinople would fall to the Walacho-Bulgarians or to the Greeks. But an astute diplomat and general, the emperor Michael See also:Palaeologus, captured it in 1261. His object was to recover all the lost territory from the Latins, but he was menaced by a great danger through See also: The enemies were strengthened by the domestic struggles within the Empire, first between Andronicus II. and his son, then between John VI. and the usurper Cantacuzenus. But before the See also:fate of Byzantium was settled the two enemies on its flanks came face to face. In 1387 the Servian power was crushed on the field of See also:Kossovo by the Ottomans (who had crossed the See also:Hellespont in 136o and taken See also:Philippopolis in 1363). Sultan Bayezid I. won Philadelphia, the last See also:Asiatic See also:possession of the Empire, and conquered See also:Trnovo, the Bulgarian capital, in 1393. Constantinople was now surrounded. The Ottoman power was momentarily eclipsed, and the career of conquest checked, by the Mongol invasion of Timur and the great defeat which it sustained in the See also:battle of See also:Angora (1402). Mahommed I. found it necessary to ally himself with the emperor Manuel. But the pause was brief. See also:Murad II. took See also:Adrianople, and tried (1422) to take Constantinople. It was small compensation that during this time the Palaeo]ogi had been successful against the See also:Franks in Greece. The situation was desperate. The Turks were in possession of the Balkan peninsula, threatening Hungary; there was no See also:chance of See also:rescue, except from western Europe. John VI. and Manuel had both visited the West in See also:search of help. The See also:jeopardy of the Empire was the opportunity of Rome, and the union of the Churches became the pressing question. It was taken up earnestly by Pope See also:Eugenius IV., and the result was the See also:Decree of Union at the council of See also:Florence in 1439. The emperor and the higher See also:clergy were really in See also:earnest, but the people and the monks did not accept it, and the last agony of Byzantium was marked by ecclesiastical quarrels. Eugenius IV. preached a crusade for the rescue of the Empire, and in 1443 an army of Hungarians and Poles, led by the Hungarian king, won a victory over Murad,which was more than avenged in the next year on the memorable field of See also:Varna. The end came nine years later under Murad's successor, Mahommed II. An army of about 150,000 blockaded the city by land and sea, and Mahommed began the siege on the 7th of See also:April. The emperor Constantine XI., Palaeologus, on whom the task of the forlorn defence devolved (and whose position was all the more difficult because he was alienated from his subjects, having embraced the Latin rite), can have had little more than 8000 men at his disposal; he received no help from the Western powers; but an experienced Genoese soldier of See also:fortune, John Justiniani, arrived with two vessels and 400 See also:cuirassiers and aided the emperor with his courage and See also:advice. The See also:resident foreigners, both Venetians and Genoese, loyally shared in the labours of the defence. The final See also:storm of the land walls took place on the See also:night of the 29th of May. All looked to Justiniani for salvation, and when he, severely wounded, retired from the See also:wall to have his See also:wound looked to, a panic ensued. The enemy seized the moment, and the See also:Janissaries in a final See also:charge rushed the stockade which had been constructed to replace a portion of the wall destroyed by the See also:Turkish See also:cannon. This decided the fate of the city. Constantine fell fighting heroically. Soon after sunrise (May 30) the Mahommedan army entered Constantinople (Stambul ='s Tf7v ir6Xty, " the city "), which was in their eyes the capital of Christendom. The ultimate responsibility for this disaster is generally imputed to the political adventurers who dismembered the Empire in 1204. It may indeed be said that at that time the Byzantine state seemed already stricken with See also:paralysis and verging to dissolution, and it was menaced by the re-arisen power of Bulgaria. But more than once before (in the 7th century and in the 11th) it had recovered its strength when it was weak and in dire peril; and, considering what the emperors of Nicaea and Michael VIII. accomplished, it seems probable that, if there had been no Fourth Crusade, it might have so revived and consolidated its forces in the course of the 13th century, as to be able to See also:cope successfully with the first advances of the Ottomans. The true statement is that the Fourth Crusade was only an incident (not in itself decisive) in a world-See also:movement which doomed the Eastern Empire to extinction—namely, the eastward movement of western Europe which began in the r rth century with the rise of the Normans and the First Crusade. Henceforward the Empire was a middle state, pressed between expanding forces on the east and on the west, and its ultimate disappearance was inevitable. Church and State.—In making the state See also:Christian, Constantine made the Church a state institution, and therefore under imperial control. Caesaro-papism was the logical consequence. The sacerdotium was See also:united with the imperium in the See also:person of the monarch as in the See also:pagan state. The Church acquiesced, and yet did not acquiesce, in this theory. When a heretical emperor sought to impose his views, champions of ecclesiastical freedom never failed to come forward. At the very beginning See also:Athanasius fought for the See also:independence of the Church against the emperor See also:Constantius. But the political principle which Constantine had taken for granted, and which was an indispensable See also:condition of his See also:adoption of Christianity, was fully recognized under See also:Theodosius I., and, notwithstanding protests from time to time, was permanent. It is significant that Constantinople, which had become a second Rome politically, with its senate and capitol, became then a second Rome ecclesiastically, and that the elevation of the see of Constantinople to patriarchal See also:rank next to the Roman see was due to Theodosius (381), who gave a permanent See also:form to the See also:dualism of the Empire. The patriarch became a state See also:minister for religion. The character of the Church as a state institution is expressed above all in the synods. The general See also:councils are not only summoned by the emperor, but are presided over by him or by his See also:lay deputies. The order of the proceedings is modelled on that of the senate. The emperor or his representative not only keeps order but conducts the deliberations and intervenes in the theological debates. It has been erroneously thought that at the council of See also:Chalcedon (451) the See also:legate of Pope Leo presided; but the acts of that See also:assembly See also:teach us otherwise; the See also:privilege which the Roman legates possessed was that of voting first (the right of the princeps senatus). The first general council at which a churchman presided was the seventh (at Nicaea, 787), at which the emperor (or empress) deputed, not a layman, but the patriarch Tarasius to preside. The resolutions of these ecclesiastical state-councils did not become the See also:law of the Empire till they were confirmed by imperial edicts. The emperors, in their capacity as heads of the Church, did not confine themselves to controlling it by controlling the councils. They soon began to issue edicts dealing with See also:theology, by virtue of their own authority. It has been said that the council of Chalcedon closed an See also:epoch of " See also:parliamentary constitutionalism "; a general council was not summoned again for more than one See also:hundred years, though the Empire during that period was seething with religious disunion and unrest. The usurper Basiliscus in his short reign set an example which his successors were not slow to follow. He issued an See also:edict quashing the decision of Chalcedon. See also:Zeno's Henotikon (see below) a few years later was the second and more famous example of a method which Justinian largely used, and of which the Ecthesis of Heraclius, the Type of Constans II. and the iconoclastic edicts of Leo III. are well-known instances. It was a question of political expediency (determined by the circumstances, the intensity and nature of the opposition, &c.) whether an emperor supported his policy or not by an ecclesiastical council. The emperor was always able to control the See also:election of the patriarch, and through him he directed the Church. Some-times emperor and patriarch collided; but in general the patriarchs were docile See also:instruments, and when they were refractory they could be deposed. There were several means of resistance open to a patriarch, though he rarely availed himself of them. His participation in the ceremony of See also:coronation was indispensable, and he could refuse to crown a new emperor except on certain conditions, and thus dictate a policy (instances in 812, Michael I.; 969, John Zimisces). There was the power of See also:excommunication (Leo VI. was excommunicated on See also:account of his fourth marriage). Another means of resistance for the Church was to invoke the support of the See also:bishop of Rome, who embodied the principle of ecclesiastical independence and whose see admittedly enjoyed See also:precedence and primacy over all the See also:sees in Christendom. Up to the end of the 8th century he was a subject of the emperor, and some emperors exerted their ecclesiastical control over Rome by drastic See also:measures (Justinian and Constans II.). But after the conquest of Italy by Charles the Great, the pope was outside the Byzantine domination; after the coronation of Charles in 800 he was associated with a rival empire; and when ecclesiastical controversies arose in the East, the party in opposition was always ready to See also:appeal to him as the highest authority in Christendom. Under the iconoclastic emperors the See also:image-worshippers looked to him as the See also:guardian of orthodoxy. As to the ecclesiastical controversies which form a leading feature of Byzantine history, their political significance alone concerns us. After the determination of the Arian controversy in 381 new questions (as to the union of the divine and human elements in the person of See also:Christ: one or two natures?) arose, and it may seem surprising that such points of abstruse theology should have awakened universal See also:interest and led to serious consequences. The See also:secret was that they masked national feelings; hence their political importance and the See also:attention which the government was forced to bestow on them. The reviving sense of See also:nationality (anti-Greek) in Syria and in Egypt found expression in the 5th century in passionate monophysitism (the See also:doctrine of one nature): theology was the only sphere in which such feelings could be uttered. The alienation and dissension which thus began had fatal consequences, smoothing the way for the Saracen conquests of those lands; the inhabitants were not unwilling to be severed politically from the Empire. This ultimate danger was at first hardly visible. What immediately troubled the emperors in the first See also:half of the5th century was the preponderant position which the see of Alexandria occupied, threatening the higher authority of Constantinople. The council of Chalcedon, called by See also:Marcian, an able statesman, was as much for the purpose of ending the domination of Alexandria as of settling the theological question. The former object was effected, but the theological decision of the council was fatal; it only sealed and promoted the disunion: The recalcitrant spirit of Syria and Egypt forced Zeno, See also:thirty years later, to issue his Henotikon, affirming the decisions of previous councils but pointedly ignoring Chalcedon. This statesman-like document secured peace in the East for a See also:generation. Rome refused to accept the Henotikon, and when Justinian resolved to restore imperial supremacy in the Western kingdoms, conciliation with Rome became a See also:matter of political importance. For the sake of this project, the unity of the East was sacrificed. The doctrine of Chalcedon was reasserted, the Henotikon set aside; New Rome and Old Rome were again hand in hand. This meant the final alienation of Egypt and Syria. The national See also:instinct which had been alive in the 5th century See also:grew into strong national sentiment in the 6th. One of the chief anxieties of Justinian's long and busy reign was to repair the See also:mischief. Deeply interested himself in matters of See also:dogma, and prepared to assert to its fullest extent his authority as See also:head of the Church, he has been called " the passionate theologian on the throne "; but in his chief ecclesiastical measures political considerations were predominant. His wife See also:Theodora was a monophysite, and he permitted her to extend her See also:protection to the heretics. He sought new formulae for the purpose of reconciliation, but nothing short of repudiation of the Chalcedon acts would have been enough. The last great efforts for union were made when the Saracens invaded and conquered the dissident provinces. A new See also:formula of union was discovered (One Will and One See also:Energy). This doctrine of monothelism would never have been heard of but for political exigencies. The Egyptians and Syrians would perhaps have accepted this See also:compromise; but it was repudiated by the fanatical adherents of Chalcedon. Heraclius sought to impose the doctrine by an edict (Ecthesis, 638), but the storm, especially in Italy and Africa, was so great that ten years later an edict known as the Type was issued by Constans forbidding all disputation about the number of See also:wills and energies. Constans was a strong ruler, and maintained the Type in spite of orthodox opposition throughout his reign. But the expediency of this policy passed when the Saracens were inexpugnably settled in their conquests, and in his successor's reign it was more See also:worth while to effect a reconciliation with Rome and the West. This was the cause of the 6th Ecumenical Council which condemned monothelism (68o-681). In the Hellenic parts of the Empire devotion to orthodoxy served as a chrysalis for the national sentiment which was to burst its See also:shell in the loth century. For the Greeks Christianity had been in a certain way continuous with paganism. It might be said that the old deities and heroes who had protected their cities were still their guardians, under the new form of See also:saints (sometimes imaginary) and archangels, and performed for them . the same See also:kind of miracles. Pagan See also:idolatry was replaced by Christian image-worship, which by the Christians of many parts of Asia Minor, as well as by the Mahommedans, was regarded as simply polytheism. Thus in the great iconoclastic controversy, which distracted the Empire for nearly 120 years, was involved, as in the monophysitic, the antagonism between different racial elements and See also:geographical sections. Leo III., whose services as a great deliverer and reformer were obscured in the memory of posterity by the ill-fame which he won as an iconoclast, was a native of Commagene. His first edict against the veneration of pictures evoked riots in the capital and a revolt in Greece. The opposition was everywhere voiced by the monks, and it is not to be overlooked that for many. monks the See also:painting of sacred pictures was their means of existence. Leo's son Constantine V. pursued the same policy with greater rigour, See also:meeting the monastic resistance by systematic persecution, and in his reign a general council condemned image-worship
(753)• Iconoclasm was supported by the army (i.e. Asia Minor), and a considerable portion of the episcopate, but it was not destined to See also:triumph. When the Athenian See also:Irene, wife of Leo IV., came to power after her See also:husband's death, as See also:regent for her son Constantine VI., she secured the restoration of the worship of icons. The Iconoclastic Council was reversed by the 7th Ecumenical Council of 787. The iconoclastic party, however, was not yet defeated, and (after the neutral reign of Nicephorus I.) came again to the helm in the reigns of the Armenian Leo V. and the first two Phrygian emperors, Michael II. and See also:Theophilus. But the Empire was weary of the struggle, and on the death of Theophilus, who had been rigorous in enforcing his policy, See also:icon-worship was finally restored by his widow Theodora (843), and the question was never reopened. This was a triumph for the Greek element in the Empire; the " See also:Sunday of orthodoxy " on which iconoclasm was formally condemned is still a great See also:day in the Greek Church.
The ablest champions who wielded their pens for the cause of icons, defending by theological arguments practices which really had their roots in polytheism, were in the See also:early See also:stage John of See also:Damascus and in the later Theodore (See also: In this struggle the Greeks and Latins were of one mind; the image-worshippers had the support of the Roman see. When the pope resisted him, Leo III. confiscated the papal estates in Sicily and Calabria; and the See also:diocese of Illyricum was withdrawn from the control of Rome and submitted to the patriarch of Constantinople. But when iconoclasm was defeated, there was no question of restoring Illyricum, nor could there be, for political reasons; since the iconoclastic schism had, with other causes, led to the detachment of the papacy from the Empire and its association with the Frankish power. By the See also:foundation of the rival Roman Empire in 800 the pope had definitely become a subject of another state. No sooner had the iconoclastic struggle terminated than See also:differences and disputes arose between the Greek and Latin Churches which finally led to an abiding schism, and helped to See also:foster the national self-consciousness of the Greeks. A strife over the patriarchal See also:chair between See also:Ignatius (deposed by Michael III. and supported by Rome) and See also:Photius the learned statesman who succeeded him, strained the relations with Rome; but a graver cause of discord was the papal attempt to win Bulgaria, whose See also:sovereign Boris had been baptized under the auspices of Michael III. (c. 865), and was inclined to See also:play Old Rome against New Rome. Photius stood out as the See also:champion of the Greeks against the claim of the Roman see, and his patriarchate, though it did not See also:lead to a final breach, marks the definite emancipation of the Greeks from the spiritual headship of Rome. This is the significance of his encyclic See also:letter (867), which formulated a number of differences in rite and doctrine between the Greek and Latin Churches, differences so small that they need never have proved a barrier to union, if on one side there had been no question of papal supremacy, and if the Greek attitude had not been the expression of a tenacious nationality. There was a reconciliation about goo, but the Churches were really estranged, and the open and ultimate breach which came in 1054, when the influence of the See also:Cluny movement was dominant at Rome (Leo IX. was pope and Michael Cerularius patriarch), sealed a disunion which had long existed. Subsequent plans of reunion were entertained by the emperors merely for political reasons, to obtain Western support against their foes, or to avert (through papal influence) the aggressive designs of Western princes. They were doomed to futility because they were not seriously meant, and the Greek population was entirely out of sympathy with these political machinations of their emperors. The Union of Lyons (1274) was soon repudiated, and the last attempt, the Union of Florence in 1439, was equally hollow (though it permanently secured the union of the Rumanians and of the Ruthenians). Part of the See also:historical significance of the relations between the Greek and Latin Churches lies in the fact that they illustrate, and promoted by way of See also:challenge, the persistence of Greek national self-consciousness. The emperors legislated against paganism and against See also:heresy, not merely under ecclesiastical pressure, but because they thought religious uniformity politically desirable. Theodosius the Great, a Spaniard, with no sympathy for Hellenic culture, set himself the task of systematically eradicating pagan institutions and customs. Though his persecution accomplished much, paganism was far from being See also:extinct either in the East or in the West in the 5th century. Not only did See also:heathen cults survive in many remote districts, but the old gods had many worshippers among the higher classes at Rome, Constantinople, Antioch, Alexandria and See also:Athens. The most distinguished Greek literati of that period were non-Christian. Justinian, who united theological See also:enthusiasm with belief in the ideal of uniformity and, like Theodosius, was cut of sympathy with See also:Hellenism (" Hellen " now came to mean " pagan "), persecuted polytheism more earnestly and severely than his predecessors. His measures created a panic among the higher classes at Byzantium, of whom many, as he suspected, were addicted to the See also:ancient religion. He instituted a See also:regular See also:inquisition, exacted oaths of orthodoxy from all officials and teachers, and closed the, philosophical See also:schools of Athens. Missionaries (and it is remarkable that he employed monophysite heretics) were sent to abolish the old heathen worship which survived in many parts of Asia Minor where Christianity had hardly penetrated. By the end of the 6th century formal paganism had practically disappeared. In Asia Minor, especially in the east, there were many dissident communities which asserted independence of the Church of Constantinople and of all ecclesiastical traditions, founding their doctrines directly on the See also:Bible. Most important of these heretics were the See also:Paulicians (q.v.), a dualistic See also:sect whom the Church regarded as Manichaeans. The See also:Autocracy and its Constitutional Forms.—With See also:Diocletian the Principate of See also:Augustus had become undisguisedly an See also:absolute See also:monarchy, and this constitution prevailed to the end. There is virtually no constitutional history in the proper sense of the See also:term in the later Roman Empire, for there was neither See also:evolution nor revolution. The monarchical See also:system remained in all its essential points unchanged, and presents a remarkable example of an autocracy of immense duration which perfectly satisfied the ideas of its subjects. No attempt was made to alter it,—to introduce, for instance, a limited monarchy or a republican government; all revolts and conspiracies were aimed at the policies of particular autocrats, not at autocracy itself; generally they only represented sectional antagonisms and personal ambitions. The emperors inherited a deeply rooted instinct of legality as a tradition from Old Rome; and this respect for law which marked their acts, along with the generally See also:good See also:administration of See also:justice, was a See also:palladium of the monarchy. They were supreme in legislation, as well as in the administrative and judicial See also:spheres; but they were on the whole moderate in wielding legislation as an instrument of policy. There were, however, recognized constitutional principles which it would have been impossible for the emperor to over-ride. (r) The elective principle, inherited from the Republic, was never changed. A new emperor had to be elected by the senate and acclaimed by the people. The See also:succession never became automatic. But even Augustus had indirectly introduced the dynastic principle. Theodosius the Great, by causing his two sons, See also:Arcadius and See also:Honorius, to be elected See also:Augusti in their See also:infancy, practically elevated the dynastic idea into a constitutional principle; henceforward it was regarded as in the regular coarse that the son See also:born to a reigning sovereign should in his infancy be elected Augustus. Thus the election, though always an indispensable form, was only a reality when a dynasty came to an end. (2) When the position of Christianity was assured by the failure of See also:Julian's reaction, it was evident that profession of that religion would henceforward be a necessary qualification for election to the throne. • This was formally and constitution-ally recognized when the coronation of the emperor by the patriarch was introduced in 459, or perhaps in 450. (3) The sovereignty of the emperor was personal and not territorial. In this respect it always retained the character which it had inherited as the offspring of a Roman magistracy. Hence no Roman territory could be granted by the emperor to another power. For instance, the Western emperor Conrad III. could promise to hand over Italy to Manuel Comnenus as the See also:dowry of his wife, but it would have been constitutionally illegal for Manuel to have made such a promise to any foreign prince; an Eastern emperor had no right to dispose of the territory of the state. Tendencies towards a territorial conception begin indeed to appear (partly under Western influence) in the time of the Palaeologi, especially in the See also:custom of bestowing appanages on imperial princes. (4) While the senate of Rome generally lost its importance and at last became a See also:mere municipal See also:body, the new senate of Constantine preserved its position as an See also:organ of the state till the fall of Constantinople. For the imperial elections it was constitutionally indispensable, and it was able sometimes to play a decisive part when the throne was vacant—its only opportunity for independent See also:action. The abolition, under Diocletian's system, of the senatorial provinces deprived the senate of the chief administrative See also:function which it exercised under the Principate; it had no legislative powers; and it lost most of its judicial functions. It was, however, still a judicial See also:court; it tried, for instance, political crimes. In See also:composition it differed from the senate of the Principate. The senators in the 4th century were chiefly functionaries in the public service, divided into the three ascending ranks of clarissimi, spectabiles. See also:illustres. The See also:majority of the members of the senatorial order lived in the provinces, forming a provincial aristocracy, and did not sit in the senate. Then the two lower ranks ceased to have a right to sit in the senate, which was confined to the illustres and men of higher rank (See also:Patricians). The senatorial order must therefore be distinguished from the senate in a narrower sense; the latter finally consisted mainly of high ministers of state and the chief officials of the See also:palace. It would be a grave See also:mistake to underrate the importance of this body, through an irrelevant contrast with the senate of the Republic or even of the Principate. Its composition ensured to it great influence as a consultative assembly; and its political See also:weight was increased by the fact that the inner council of imperial advisers was practically a See also:committee of the senate. The importance of the senate is illustrated by the fact that in the rlth century Constantine X., in order to carry out a revolutionary, anti-military policy, found it necessary to alter the composition of the senate by introducing a number of new men from the lower classes. (5) The memory of the power which had once belonged to the populus Romanus lingered in the part which the inhabitants of New Rome, and their representatives, played in ac-claiming newly elected emperors, and in such ceremonies as coronations. In the 6th century the factions (" demes ") of the See also:circus, Blues and Greens, appear as political parties, distract the city by their quarrels, and break out in serious riots. On one occasion they shook the throne (" Nika " revolt, 532). The emperors finally quelled this element of disturbance by giving the factions a new organization, under " demarchs " and " democrats," and assigning them a definite quasi-political See also:locus standi in the public ceremonies in the palace and the capital. The See also:duty of providing panem et circenses was inherited from Old Rome; but the See also:free See also:distribution of See also:bread cannot be traced beyond the 6th century (had the loss of the Egyptian granary to do with its cessation?), while the See also:spectacles of the See also:hippodrome lasted till the end. Outside the capital the people took little interest in politics, except when theology was concerned; and it may be said generallythat it was mainly in the ecclesiastical sphere that public See also:opinion among the masses, voiced by the clergy and monks, was an influence which made itself See also:felt. The court ceremonial of Constantinople, which forms such a See also:market contrast to the ostentatiously See also:simple establishments of Augustus and the Antonines, had in its origin a certain constitutional significance. It was introduced by See also:Aurelian and Diocletian, not, we must suppose, from any personal love of display, but rather to dissociate the emperor from the army, at a time when the state had been shaken to its See also:foundations by the pre-dominance of the military element and the dependence of the emperor on the soldiers. It was the object of Diocletian to make him independent of all, with no more particular relation to the army than to any other element in the state; the royal court and the inaccessibility of the ruler were calculated to promote this object. The See also:etiquette and ceremonies were greatly elaborated by Justinian, and were diligently maintained and See also:developed. The public functions, which included processions through the streets to various sanctuaries of the city on the great feast-days of the Church, supplied entertainment of which the populace never wearied; and it did not See also:escape the wit of the rulers that the splendid functions and See also:solemn etiquette of the court were an effective means of impressing the See also:imagination of foreigners, who constantly resorted to Constantinople from neighbouring kingdoms and dependencies, with the See also:majesty and power of the Basileus. The imperial dignity was collegial. There could be two or more emperors (imperatores, flauiXeIs) at the same time; edicts were issued, public acts performed, in their See also:joint names. Through the period of dualism, in the 4th and 5th centuries, when the administration of the Eastern provinces was generally separate from that of the Western, the imperial authority was also collegial. But after this period the system of divided authority came to an end and was never renewed. There was frequently more than one emperor, not only in the case of a father and his sons, or of two See also:brothers, but also in the case of a minority, when a regent is elected emperor (Romanus I.; cf. Nicephorus II. and John Zimisces). But one colleague always exercised the See also:sole authority, was the real monarch, the " great " or the " first " Basileus; the other or others were only sleeping partners. Under the Comneni a new nomenclature was introduced; a brother, e.g., who before could have become the formal colleague of the ruler, received the title of Sebastocrator (Sebastos was the Greek See also:equivalent of Augustus). Legislation.—The history of the legislation of the Eastern Empire is distinguished by three epochs associated with the names of (1) Justinian, (2) Leo III., (3) Basil I. and Leo VI. (1) The Justinianean legislation (see JUSTINIAN) is thoroughly Roman in spirit, and inspired by pious See also:adhesion to the traditions of the past; but it admitted modifications of the older law in accordance with tendencies which had been long since making themselves felt: See also:consideration is accorded to principles of humanity in the laws affecting persons, and to the principle of public interest in the laws See also:relating to things. Justinian not only sanctioned changes which time had brought about, like the mitigation of the strict patria potestas and the greater independence of wives, but introduced a revolutionary See also:change in the law of succession to property, abolishing inheritance by agnatio or relationship through See also:males, and substituting inheritance by blood relationship whether through males or See also:females. (2) Justinian's reign was followed by a period in which juristic studies decayed. The seventh century, in which social order was profoundly disturbed, is a See also:blank in legal history, and it would seem that the law of Justinian, though it had been rendered into Greek, almost ceased to be studied or understood. Practice at least was modified by principles in See also:accord with the public opinion of Christian society and influenced by ecclesiastical canons. In a See also:synod held at Constantinople in the reign of Justinian II. numerous rules - were enacted, differing from the existing laws and based on ecclesiastical doctrine and See also:Mosaic principles, and these were sanctioned as laws of the realm by the emperor. Thus Church influence and the decline of Roman tradition, in a state which had become predominantly Greek, determined the character of the ensuing legislative epoch under the auspices of Leo III., whose law See also:book (A.D. 740), written in Greek, marks a new era and reflects the changed ideas of the community. Entitled a " Brief Selection of Laws " and generally known as the Ecloga, it may be described as a Christian law book. In regard to the patria potestas increased facilities are given for emancipation from paternal control when the son comes to years of discretion, and the paternal is to a certain extent replaced by a parental control over minors. The law of guardianship is considerably modified. The laws of marriage are transformed under the influence of the Christian conception of See also:matrimony; the institution of concubinatus is abolished. Impediments to marriage on account of See also:consanguinity and of spiritual relationship are multiplied. While Justinian regarded marriage as a See also:contract, and therefore, like any other contract, dissoluble at the See also:pleasure of the parties, Leo III. accepted the Church view that it was an indissoluble See also:bond. Ecclesiastical influence is written large in the criminal law, of which a prominent feature is the substitution of See also:mutilation of various kinds for the capital See also:penalty. Death is retained for some crimes, such as See also:murder and high See also:treason; other offences were punished by amputation (of hand, See also:nose, &c.). This system (justified by the passage in the New Testament, " If thine See also:eye offend thee," &c.), though to See also:modern notions barbaric, seemed a step in the direction of leniency; and it may be observed that the tendency to avoid capital See also:punishment increased, and we are told that in the reign of John Comnenus it was never inflicted. (The same spirit, it may be noted, is apparent in the usual, though by no means invariable, practice of Byzantine emperors to render dethroned rivals or members of a deposed dynasty innocuous by depriving them of eyesight or forcing them to take monastic orders, instead of putting them to death.) The Church, which had its own system of penalties, exercised a great influence on the actual operation of criminal law, especially through the privilege of See also:asylum (recognized by Justinian, but with many reserves and restrictions), which was granted to Christian churches and is admitted without exceptions in the Ecloga. (3) The last period of legislative activity under Basil I. and Leo VI. represents a reaction, in a certain measure, against the Ecloga and a return to Justinian. The Ecloga had met See also:practical needs, but the Isaurian and Phrygian emperors had done nothing to revive legal study. To do so was the aim of Basil, and the revival could only be based on Justinianean law books or their Greek representatives. These books were now treated somewhat as Justinian and his lawyers had treated their own predecessors. A handbook of extracts from the Institutes, See also:Digest and See also:Code was issued in 879 (b •rpbxetpos v6pos, " the law as it is "), to fulfil somewhat the same function as the Institutes. Then a :ollection of all the laws of the Empire was prepared by means of two commissions, and completed under Leo VI. It was entitled the Basilika. In many points (in See also:civil, but not in criminal, law) the principles of the Ecloga are set aside in favour of the older See also:jurisprudence. Thus the Justinianean ordinances on the subject of See also:divorce were revived, and there remained henceforward a contra-diction between the civil and the See also:canon law. After this there was no legislation on a grand See also:scale; but there was a great revival of legal study under Constantine IX., who founded a new law-school, and there were many learned specialists who wrote important commentaries, such as John Xiphilin (11th century), Theodore Balsamon (12th century), Harmenopulos (14th century). The civil code of See also:Moldavia (published 1816-17) is a codification of Byzantine law; and modern Greece, although in framing its code it took the See also:Napoleonic for its See also:model, professes theoretically to See also:base its civil law on the edicts of the emperors as contained in the Hexabiblos of Harmenopulos. Administration.—Three principles underlay the administrative reform of Diocletian: the separation of civil from military functions; the formation of small provincial See also:units; and the scalar structure which deepened on the interposition of the See also:vicar of a diocese and the praetorian See also:prefect between the provincial See also:governor and the emperor. This system lasted unchanged for three and a half centuries. The few unimportant alterations that were made were in See also:harmony with its spirit, until the reign of Justinian, who introduced certain reforms that pointed in a new direction. We find him combining some of the small provinces into large units, under-See also:mining the scalar system by doing away with some of the dioceses and vicars, and placing in some cases military and civil authority in the same hands. The chief aim of Diocletian in his general reform had been to secure central control over the provincial governments; the object of Justinian in these particular reforms was to remedy corruption and oppression. These changes, some of which were soon cancelled, would hardly in themselves have led to a See also:radical change; but they prepared the way for an administrative revolution, brought about by stress of external necessities. In the 7th century all the energies of the Empire, girt about by active enemies, were centred on war and defence; everything had to give way to military exigencies; and a new system was gradually introduced which led ultimately to the abolition of the old. The change began in Italy and Africa, at the end of the 6th century, where operations against the Lombards and the See also:Berbers were impeded by the See also:friction between the two co-See also:ordinate military and civil authorities (masters of soldiers, and praetorian prefects). The military See also:governors were made supreme with the title of exarchs, " viceroys "; the civil authority was subordinated to them in case of collision, otherwise remaining unaltered. The change is an See also:index of the dangerous crisis through which these provinces were passing. In the East similar circumstancesled to similar results. The Saracen danger See also:hanging imminent over Asia Minor imposed a policy of the same kind. And so before the end of the 7th century we find the Empire divided into six great military provinces, three in Europe and three in Asia: (r) Exarchate of Africa, (2) Exarchate of Italy, (3) Strategia of Thrace, (4) See also:County of Opsikion ( = obsequium), including See also:Bithynia, Honorias, See also:Paphlagonia, parts of Hellespontus and See also:Phrygia, (5) Strategia of the Anatolikoi, most of west and central Asia Minor, (6) Strategia of the Armeniakoi, eastern Asia Minor. In. addition to these there was a naval circumscription, (7) the Strategia of the Karabisidnoi (from xfipaf3os, a See also:vessel), including the southern coastland of Asia Minor, and the Aegean (see below under Navy). The lands of the old prefecture of Illyricum were not included in the system, because this part of the Empire was then regarded as a lost position. On the contrary, here military powers were committed to the Prefect of Illyricum, whose actual sphere extended little beyond Thessalonica, which was surrounded by Slavonic tribes, The Eastern changes, perhaps initiated by Heraclius, but probably due mainly to Constans II., did not interfere with the civil administration, except in so far as its heads were subordinated to the military commanders. But Leo III., who as a great administrative reformer ranks with Augustus and Diocletian, did away with the old system altogether: (r) See also:Reversing Diocletian's principle, he combined military and civil powers in the same hands. The strategos or military See also:commander became also a civil governor; his higher officers (turmarchs) were likewise civil functionaries. (2) The scalar principle disappeared, including both the vicars and the praetorian prefect of the East (some of whose functions were merged in those of the prefect of the city); no authority inter-posed between the strategoi and the emperor. (3) The new provinces, which were called themes (the name marks their military origin: thema=See also:corps), resembled in See also:size the provinces of Augustus, each including several of the Diocletian divisions. This third and last provincial reform has, like its predecessors, its own history. The See also:list of themes in the rlth century is very different from that of the 8th. The changes were in one direction—the reduction of large provinces by cutting off parts to form smaller themes, a repetition of the See also:process which reduced the provinces of Augustus. Hence the themes came to vary greatly in size and importance. Leo himself began the process by breaking up the Anatolic command into two themes (Anatolic and Thracesian). The principle of splitting up was carried out systematically by Leo VI. (who was also responsible for a new ecclesiastical See also:division of the Empire). The development will be exhibited by a list of the themes in the middle of the loth century. A. Asia: 1(1) Opsikion, (2) Optimaton, (3) Paphlagonia, (4) Bukellarianl =old Opsikion; {O Anatolic, (6) Thracesian, (7) See also:Samos (naval), (8) See also:Cappadocia, (9) See also:Seleucia} =old Anatolic; {(ro) Armeniac, (II) Colonea, (12) Sebastea, (13) Charsianon, (14) Chaldia, (15) See also:Mesopotamia} =old Armeniac; (16) Cibyrrhaeot, (17) Aegean (=Dodekanesos). B. Europe: (1) Thrace, (2) Macedonia, (3) Strymon, (4) Thessalonica, (5) Hellas, (6) See also:Peloponnesus, (7) See also:Nicopolis, (8) Dyrrhachium, (9) Longibardia, (to) Cephallenia, (II) Cherson. It is interesting to note that up to Leo VI. the See also:district between Constantinople and the wall of See also:Anastasius formed a separate theme or government, entitled the Wall (rb reixtov) or the Ditch (s) rb¢pos); Leo VI. united it with the theme of Thrace. In the central administration, the general principles seem to have remained unchanged; the heads of the great administrative bureaux in Constantinople retain the See also:palatine character which belonged to most of them from the beginning. But there were many changes in these offices, in their nomenclature and the delimitation of their functions. There are great differences between the administrative corps in the 5th, in the loth and in the 15th centuries. We can hardly be wrong in conjecturing that, along with his provincial reform, Leo III. made a re. arrangement of the central bureaux; the abolition of the Praetorian Prefecture of the East entailed, in itself, modifications. But minor changes were continually being made, and we may note the following tendencies: (r) Increase in the number of ministers directly responsible to the emperor, (a) subordinate offices in the bureaux being raised to the rank of independent ministries; (b) new offices being created and old ones becoming merely titular. (2) Changes in nomenclature; substitution of Greek for Latin titles. (3) Changes in the relative importance and rank of the high officials, both civil and military. The Prefect of the City (irapxos) controlled the See also:police organization and administration of justice in the capital; he was See also:vice-See also:president of the imperial court of justice, and, when the See also:office of Prefect of the East was abolished, he inherited the functions of that dignitary as See also:judge of appeals from the provinces. But the praefectus vigilum, commander of the city See also:guards, who was subordinate to him, became an independent officer, entitled Drungary of the See also:Watch, and in the 11 th century superseded him as vice-president of the imperial court. We are told that in the last years of the Empire the Prefect of the City had no functions at all; but his office survives in the Shehr-imaneli, " city prefecture," of the Ottomans, in whose organization there are many traces of Byzantine influence. Instead of the Quaestor of the Sacred Palace, whose duty was to draft the imperial laws and rescripts, we find in the 9th century a quaestor who possesses certain judicial and police functions and is far lower in the See also:hierarchy of rank. It has been supposed that the later quaestor really inherited the duties of another officer, the quaesitor, who was instituted by Justinian. In the latest period the quaestor, if he still existed as a name, had no functions. The See also:Master of Offices, who supervised the bureaux in the palace and was master of court ceremonies, also performed many functions of a minister of foreign affairs, was head of the imperial See also:post (cursus), and of the corps of agentes in See also:rebus or Imperial Messengers. This See also:ministry disappeared, probably in the 8th century, but the title was retained as a dignity at all events till the end of the 9th. The most important functions, pertaining to foreign affairs, were henceforward performed by the See also:Logothete of the Post (ko'yoOirtls rou Spbµov). In the 12th century this minister was virtually the See also:chancellor of the Empire; his title was changed to that of Great Logothete by Andronicus II. The two financial ministers, comes sacrarum largitionum and comes rei privatae, continued to the end under the titles ?o'yo-Birgs rou yevu(ov (General Logothete) and 6 furl roil iScK011 (Anastasius added a third, the See also:Count of the Sacred Patrimony, but he was afterwards suppressed). But in the 9th century we find both these ministers inferior in rank to the Sacellarius, or private pursekeeper of the emperor. Besides these there was a fourth important financial See also:department, that of the military See also:treasury, under a Logothete. The employment of eunuchs as high ministers of state was a feature of the Byzantine Empire from the end of the 4th century. It is laid down as a principle (A.D. 900) that all offices are open to them, except the Prefecture of the City, the quaestorship, and the military posts which were held by " Domestics." There were then eight high posts which could only be held by eunuchs, of which the chief were the parakoimomenos and the protovestiarios (master of the See also:wardrobe). An emperor who had not the brains or energy to See also:direct the affairs of the state himself, necessarily committed the task of guiding the helm to some particular minister or court dignitary who had gained his confidence. Such a position of power was outside the constitution, and was not associated with any particular office; it might be held by an ecclesiastic or a See also:eunuch; it had been held by the eunuchs See also:Eutropius and Chrysaphius in the reigns of Arcadius and Theodosius IL respectively. In later times, such a first minister came to be denoted by a technical term, 6 rapa5vvacrrevwv. This was the position, for instance, of Stylianus, the father-in-law of Leo VI. Most of the emperors between Basil II. and Alexius Comnenus were under the influence of such ministers. The orders of rank (which must be distinguished from titles of office) were considerably increased in later times. In the 4th and 7th centuries there were the three great classes of the illustres, spectabiles and clarissimi; and above the illustres a small, higher class of patricians. In the 9th century we find an entirely different system; the number of classes being largely augmented, and thenomenclature different. Instead of epithets like illustres, the names are titles which had designated offices; patrician " alone survives. The highest rank is now (I) the magistroi; then come the patricians in two classes: (2) proconsular patricians, (3) respectable patricians; below these (4) protospatharioi; (5) dishypatoi (=bis consules); (6) spatharokandidatoi; (7) spatharioi; and other lower ranks. Particular ranks do not seem now to have been inalienably attached to particular offices. The strategos of the Anatolic Theme, e.g., might be a patrician or only a protospathar. Whoever was promoted to one of these ranks received its insignia from the emperor's hand, and had to pay fixed fees to various officials, especially to the palace eunuchs, In the provinces See also:ordinary justice was administered by See also:judges (aptrat) who were distinct from the governors of the themes, and inherited their functions from the old provincial governors of Diocletian's system. In Constantinople higher and lower courts of justice sat regularly and frequently. The higher tribunals were those of the Prefect and the Quaestor, before whom different kinds of cases came. Appeals reached the emperor through the See also:bureau of Petitions (r&'v Se',yr wv); he might deal with the case immediately; or might refer it to the imperial court of appeal, of which he was president; or else to the See also:special court of the Twelve Divine Judges (Belot &rcaorat), which was instituted by Justinian. While the administration of justice was one of the best features of the Eastern Empire, its fiscal system, likewise inherited from the early Empire, was one of its worst. If the government had been acquainted with the principles of public See also:economy, which have not been studied till comparatively See also:recent times, a larger See also:revenue might have been raised without injuring the prosperity of the inhabitants. Taxes were injudiciously imposed and oppressively collected. The See also:commerce of the Empire was one of its great See also:sources of strength, but the government looked on the merchants as a class from which the utmost should be extorted. The chief source of revenue was the land. The See also:main burdens which fell upon the landed proprietors throughout the whole period were the land tax proper and the See also:annona. The land tax (capitatio terrena = the old tributum of the imperial, stipendium of the senatorial, provinces) was based, not on the yearly produce, but on the capital of the proprietor, the character and value of the land being taken into account. In later times this seems to have become the Karrvucbv, or See also:hearth tax. The annona was an additional See also:impost for supporting the army and imperial officials; it was originally paid in produce. In later times, we meet it under the name of nrapKia or ovvcavil. The province was divided into fiscal districts, and the See also:total revenue to be derived from each was entered in a book of See also:assessment. The assessment was in early times revised every fifteen years (the " indiction " period), but subsequently such revisions seem to have been very irregular. The collection of the taxes was managed through the curial system, while it lasted (till 7th century?). The decurions, or municipal councillors, of the chief See also:town in each district were responsible for See also:collecting and delivering the whole amount, and had to make good the sums owed by defaulters. This system of collective responsibility pressed very heavily on the decurions, and helped to cause their decay in the Western provinces. After the abolition of the curial organization, the principle of collective responsibility remained in the form of the irre/iokil or additional charge; that is, if a property was See also:left without an owner, the taxes for which it was liable became an extra charge on the other members of the district (ol 6j uKfvvoc). The taxes were collected by praktores, who were under the General Logothete. The See also:peasant proprietors were also liable to burdens of other kinds (corvees), of which the most important was the furnishing of horses, vehicles, postboys, &c., for the state post (see See also:ANGARIA). The history of landed property and agrarian conditions in the Eastern Empire still awaits a thorough examination. It may be noted that individual hereditary proprietorship was always the rule (on crown and monastic lands as well as in other cases), and that the commonly supposed extensive existence of communities possessing land in See also:common is based on erroneous See also:interpretation of documents. When imperial lands were granted to monasteries or as fiefs (orp6va.at) to individuals, the position and rights of the peasant proprietors on the estates were not changed, but in many cases the imposts were paid to the new master instead of to the fisc. In the 4th, 5th and 6th centuries the cultivators were attached to the See also:soil (coloni, ascripticii; see See also:SERFDOM), in the interests of the fiscus; it has been supposed, on insufficient grounds, that this serfdom was abolished for a time by Leo III., though it is probable that the condition of the peasants was largely changed by the invasions of the 7th century. In any case the system of compulsory See also:attachment of peasants to their lands remained in force, and the class of adscripticii (ivaa6ypa4or) existed till the latest times. The chief sources for agrarian conditions are, besides the imperial laws, monastic records, among which may be mentioned as specially valuable those of the Monastery of Lemboi near See also:Smyrna. Army and Navy.—The general principle of the military defence of the Empire in the 4th century consisted in large forces stationary on the frontiers, and reserve forces, stationed in the interior provinces, which could be moved to any point that was in danger. Thus the army was composed of (1) the limitanei, frontier-troops (under daces), and (2) reserve forces (under magistri militum) of two denominations, (a) palatini and (b) comitatenses. The limitanei were the more numerous; it has been estimated that if they numbered about 350,000, the comitatenses and palatini together amounted to less than 200,000. It is to be noted that for the old See also:legion of 6000 men a smaller legion of See also:i000 had been substituted, and that the See also:pro-portion of See also:cavalry to See also:infantry was small. In the 6th century the fundamental principles of the system were the same; but the cavalry had become a much more important See also:branch of the service, and in the See also:wars of See also:Belisarius the foederati, barbarian mercenaries of various races, commanded by their own chiefs, played a great role. The peasants of See also:Illyria and Thrace, the mountaineers of southern Asia Minor still supply an important part of the army, but the number of barbarians (See also:Heruli, See also:Vandals, Goths, Slays, Arabs, &c.) is much larger. Solidity and a corresponding want of mobility characterized at this time both cavalry and infantry; their great merit was straight and rapid See also:shooting: Belisarius ascribed his success in Italy to the excellence of the See also:archery. It is remarkable with what small forces (not more than 25,000) the first conquest of Italy was achieved, though Belisarius was far from being a military See also:genius and the discipline in his army was flagrantly defective. Frontier Defence.— Justinian carried out on the frontiers and in the exposed provinces a carefully devised and expensive system of defensive works. Fortified towns along the limes were connected by intervening forts, and at some distance behind was a second line of more important fortresses more strongly garrisoned, which furnished both a second barrier and places of See also:refuge for the inhabit-ants of the open country. There was an elaborate system of signals by which the garrisons of the front stations could announce not only the imminence of a hostile invasion, but the number and character of the enemy. In North Africa there are abundant remains of the forts of the 6th and 7th centuries, displaying the military See also:architecture of the period and the general frontier system. The typical fortress had three defences: the wall flanked by square towers of three storeys; at a few yards' distance a second wall of See also: In the 11th century, after the conquest of Bulgaria, there were two Domestics, one for the east and one for the west, and under Alexius Comnenus the Domestic of the west received the title Great Domestic. Under the Palaeologi the Great Domestic was See also:superior in rank to all other ministers. Besides the Scholarians, and the Excubitores (who had been organized in the 5th century), there were the regiments of the Hikanatoi, the Arithmos and the Numeroi. The Numeroi were See also:foot-soldiers. The Optimatoi, also infantry, properly belonged to the same See also:category, though they were constituted as a theme. It is to be observed that the demes or corporations of Constantinople were partly organized as See also:militia, and were available for purposes of defence. The great difference between this Byzantine army and that of the earlier Empire is that its strength (like that of the feudal armies of the West) lay entirely in cavalry, which the successors of Heraclius and the Isaurian emperors developed to great perfection. The few contingents of foot were quite subsidiary. The army was free from the want of discipline which was so notable in the 6th century; it was maintained in Asia Minor, which was the great recruiting ground, by a system of military holdings of land (an ex-tension of the old Roman system of assigning lands in the frontier districts to federate barbarians and to veterans). The conditions of the marauding expeditions and guerilla warfare, continuously carried on against and by the Saracens in the 8th, 9th and loth centuries, were carefully studied by generals and tacticians, and we possess the theory of the Byzantine methods in a See also:treatise See also:corn-posed by the emperor Nicephorus Phocas, and edited by one of his pupils. Every detail of an inroad into Saracen territory is regulated. In the 8th and 9th centuries there was a system of signals by which an approaching Saracen incursion was announced to Constantinople from the Cilician frontier. The See also:news was flashed across Asia Minor by eight See also:beacon fires. The first beacon was at Lulon (which commanded the pass between Tyana and the Cilician gates), the last on Mt. See also:Auxentius in Bithynia. When this fire appeared, a See also:light was kindled in the pharos of the imperial palace at Constantinople. The system was discontinued in the reign of Michael III., probably after the capture of Lulon by the enemy in 86o, and was not renewed, though Lulon was recovered in 877. It should be noted that this famous telegraphic system was only an application on a large scale of the frontier signalling referred to above. The loss of a great part of Asia Minor to the Seljuks, and the disorganization of the provinces which they did not acquire, seriously weakened the army, and the emperors had recourse more and more to foreign mercenaries and barbarian auxiliaries. The employment of Scandinavians had begun in the loth century, and in 988 was formed the Varangian guard, consisting chiefly of See also:English adventurers. In the See also:arsenal of Venice are two lions, which were transported from the See also:Peiraeus, inscribed with obscure Runic characters, carved perhaps by Scandinavians in the army of Basil II. Under Michael IV. the famous See also:Norwegian prince See also:Harald Hardrada (described by a Greek writer as " Araltes, son of the king of Varangia ") fought for the Empire in Sicily and in Bulgaria. But in the latter part of the i rth century foreign mercenaries greatly increased in numbers and importance. The note of the Byzantine army was efficiency, and nowhere is the immeasurable superiority of the civilization of the Eastern, Empire to the contemporary states of Europe more apparent. The theory of military See also:science was always studied and taught; See also:constant practice, interpreting and correcting theories, safeguarded it against pedantry; and a class of magnificent See also:staff officers were trained, who in the loth century were the terror of the enemy. The particular See also:tactics of the various foes whom they had to face were critically studied. We have a series of military See also:text-books, from the time of Anastasius I. to that of Basil II., in which we can learn their principles and methods. In this army there was plenty of courage, and distinct professional See also:pride, but no love of fighting for fighting's sake, nor the spirit which in western Europe developed into See also:chivalry. The Byzantines despised such ideas as characteristic of barbarians who had See also:physical strength and no brains. The object of a good general, as Leo VI. shows in his important treatise on Tactics, was in their opinion not to win a great battle, but to attain success without the risks and losses of a great battle. The same author criticizes the military character of the Franks. Paying a See also:tribute to their fearlessness, he points out their want of discipline, the haphazard nature of their See also:array and order of battle, their eagerness to attack before the word was given, their want of See also:faculty for strategy or See also:tactical combinations, their incapacity for operations on difficult ground, the ease with which they could be deceived by simple artifices, their carelessness in pitching camps, and their lack of a proper intelligence department. These criticisms, See also:borne out by all we know of feudal warfare, illustrate the contrast between a western See also:host, with its three great " battles," rushing headlong at the foe, and the Byzantine army, with its large number of small units, co-operating in perfect harmony, under a commander who had been trained in military science, had a definite plan in his head, and could rely on all his subordinates for strict and intelligent obedience. Under the early Empire, as Rome had no rival in the Mediterranean, it was natural that the navy and naval theory should be neglected. When Constantine the Great decided to besiege Byzantium by sea, both he and his opponent See also:Licinius had to create fleets for the struggle. Even when the Vandals in Africa made transmarine conquests and became a naval power, the Romans did not seriously address themselves to See also:building an efficient navy and securing their own thalassocracy; the Vandals harried their coasts; their expeditions against Africa failed. And even when the Vandal power was in its decline and Belisarius set forth on his successful expedition of conquest, his fears for the safety of his See also:squadron in case he should be attacked at sea allow us to suspect that the fleet of the enemy was superior to the Roman. The conquest of Africa secured for Justinian the undisputed command of the Mediterranean, but he did nothing for the naval establishment. It was not till the Saracens, aspiring to conquer all the Mediterranean coastlands, became a naval power that the Roman Empire was forced, in a struggle for its being, to organize an efficient fleet. This, as we saw, was the work of Constans II., and we saw what it achieved. In this first period (c. 650-720) the naval forces, designated as the Karabisianoi, were placed under the command of an See also:admiral, with title of sirategos. They consisted of two geographical divisions, each under a drungarios: the province of the Cibyrrhaeots (probably named from the smaller Cibyra in See also:Pamphylia) which included the southern coast districts of Asia Minor, and the Aegean province, which embraced the islands and part of the west coast of Asia Minor. The former was the more important; the See also:marines of this province were the See also:hardy descendants of the pirates, whose subjugation had taxed the resources of the Roman government in the last years of the Republic. It was a new principle to impose the See also:burden of naval defence on the coast and See also:island districts. Distinct from these fleets, and probably organized on a different principle, was the naval contingent stationed at Constantinople. Leo III. changed the naval administration, abolishing the supreme command, and making the Cibyrrhaeot and Aegean provinces separate independent themes under strategoi. The change was due to two motives. There was a danger lest a commander of the whole navy should become over powerful (indicated in the political role played by the navy before Leo's accession); but apart from this, the general reform of Leo, which united civil and military powers in the same hands, naturally placed the commanders of the two branches of the navy on a new footing, by making them provincial governors. In this and the following reigns, the tendency was to neglect the fleet; the interest of the government was concentrated on the army. For a time this policy was prosecuted with impunity, since the Omayyad dynasty was growing weak, and then under the See also:Abbasids, who transferred the capital from Damascus to See also:Bagdad, the sea-power of the caliphate declined. But the neglect of the fleet was avenged in the 9th century, when Crete and Sicily were wrested from the Empire, the loss of south Italy was imminent, and Moslem squadrons sailed in the Adriatic,—losses and dangers which led to a reorganization of the navy under Basil I. and Leo VI. After this reform we find the navy consisting of two main contingents: the imperial fleet (stationed at Constantinople), and the provincial fleets, three in number, of (a) Cibyrrhaeot theme, (b) Aegean theme, (c) theme of Samos. A small distinct contingent was supplied by the Mardaites who, natives of Mt. See also:Lebanon, had been transplanted (partly to Pamphylia, partly to Epirus, the Ionian Islands, and Peloponnesus). The imperial fleet seems to have consisted of about too warships manned by 23,000 marines (the same men fought and rowed) ; the provincial fleets of 77 warships manned by 17,000. When the fleets acted together, the admiral in supreme command for the time was called the " drungarios of the naval forces." The warships (Spoµo,ver, "dromonds") were mainly biremes, but there were also uniremes, built for See also:speed, called "galleys " (yaXalat). Pyrotechnic was an important department in the naval establishment; the manufacture of the terrible explosive known as liquid or marine fire (see GREEK FIRE) was carefully guarded as a state secret. The navy, active and efficient in the loth century, is described by a military and therefore unprejudiced officer of the 11th as the See also:glory of Romania. But towards the end of the rxth century it declined, the main cause being the disorganization of the naval provinces of Asia Minor, which, as we saw, was a result of the Seljuk conquest of the interior. This decline had important in-direct consequences; it led to the dependence of the Empire on the Venetian navy in the struggle with the Norman power, and for this help Venice exacted commercial privileges which injured Byzantine commerce and opened the See also:door to the preponderant influences of the Venetians in eastern See also:trade. In the period of the Palaeologi the imperial navy, though small, was active; and the importance which it possessed for the state is illustrated by the high rank at court which the admiral (who in the t lth century had received the title of Great See also:Duke, pEyas Sous) then occupied; the only minister who was superior to him was the Great Domestic.
Diplomacy.—In protecting the state against the barbarians who surrounded it, diplomacy was a weapon as important in the eyes of the Byzantine government as soldiers or fortifications.
The peace on the frontiers was maintained not only by strong military defences, but by more or less skilful management of the frontier peoples. In the later Empire this kind of diplomacy, which we may define as the science of managing the barbarians, was practised as a See also:fine See also:art; its full development was due to Justinian. Its methods fall under three general heads. (I) One people was kept in check by means of another. The imperial government fomented rivalry and hatred among them. Thus Justinian kept the Gepidae in check by the Lombards, the Kuturgurs by the Utigurs, the See also:Huns by the See also:Avars. (2) Subsidies were given to the peoples on the frontiers, in return for which they undertook to defend the frontier adjacent to them, and to supply fighting men when called upon to do so. The chiefs received honours and decorations. Thus the See also:Berber chiefs on the See also:African border received a staff of See also:silver, encrusted with See also:gold, a silver diadem, See also: More important potentates were invested with a costlier See also:dress. In these investitures precedence was carefully observed. The chiefs thus received a definite position in the Empire, and the rich See also:robes, with the ceremony, appealed to their vanity. In some cases they were admitted to posts in the official hierarchy, being created Patricians, Masters of soldiers, &c. They were extremely fond of such honours, and considered themselves half-Romans. Another mode of winning influence was to marry barbarian princes to Roman wives, and See also:rear their sons in the luxury of the palace. Dissatisfied pre-tenders, defeated candidates for kingship, were welcomed at Constantinople. Thus there were generally some princes, thoroughly under Byzantine influence, who at a favourable opportunity could be imposed on their compatriots. Through-out Justinian's reign there was a constant influx of foreign potentates to Constantinople, and he overwhelmed them with attentions, pompous ceremonies and valuable presents. (3) Both these methods were already See also:familiar to the Roman government, although Justinian employed them far more extensively and systematically than any of his predecessors. The third method was new and characteristic. The close connexion of religion and politics at Constantinople prepares us to find that Christian propaganda should go hand-in-hand with conquest, and that the missionary should co-operate with the soldier. The missionary proved an excellent See also:agent. The typical See also:procedure is as follows. In the land which he undertakes to convert, the missionary endeavours to gain the confidence of the king and influential persons, and makes it a special object to enlist the sympathies of the See also:women. If the king hesitates, it is suggested that he should visit New Rome. The attraction of this idea is irresistible, and when he comes to the capital, the pomp of his reception, the honours shown him by the emperor. and the splendour of the religious ceremonies overcome his last scruples. Thenceforward imperial influence is predominant in his dominion; priests become his advisers; a bishop is consecrated, dependent on the patriarch of Constantinople; and the barbarians are transformed by the penetration of Byzantine ideas. By the application of these various means, Justinian established Roman influence in See also:Nubia, See also:Ethiopia and South Arabia, in the ' Caucasian regions, and on the coast of the Euxine. The con-version of the Lazi (of See also:Colchis) was specially notable, and that of the Sabiri, who were politically important because they commanded the eastern pass of the Caucasus known as the See also:Caspian Gates. It will be observed that the great See also:prestige of the Empire was one of the conditions of the success of this policy. The policy had, of course, its dangers, and was severely criticized by one of Justinian's contemporaries, the historian See also:Procopius. Concessions encouraged greater demands; the riches of the Empire were revealed. It was a system, of course, which could not be permanently successful without military power behind it, and of course it was not infallible; but in principle it was well-founded, and proved of immeasurable value. Less prejudiced writers than Procopius fully admit the far-sightedness and dexterity of the emperor in his See also:diplomatic activity. A full account of it will be found in Diehl's Justinien.
In the loth century we have again the means of observing how the government conducted its foreign policy on carefully
thought out principles. The Empire was then exposed to constant danger from Bulgaria, to inroads of the Magyars, and to attacks of the Russians. The See also: In the 9th century it was an object of the government to maintain the Khazars (whose army consisted mainly of mercenaries) against the Pet chenegs; and hence, if it should become necessary to hold the Khazars in check, the principle was to incite against them not the Petchenegs, but other less powerful neighbours, the Alans of the Caucasus, and the people of "See also:Black Bulgaria" on the middle See also:Volga (a state which survived till the Mongol conquest). For this systematic diplomacy it was necessary to collect See also:information about the peoples whom it concerned. The ambassadors sent to the homes of barbarous peoples reported every-thing of interest they could discover. We owe to See also:Priscus a famous graphic account of the See also:embassy which he accompanied to the court of See also:Attila. We possess an account of an embassy sent to the Turks in Central Asia in the second half of the 6th century, derived from an official See also:report. Peter the Patrician in Justinian's reign See also:drew up careful reports of his embassies to the Persian court. When foreign envoys came to Constantinople, information was elicited from them as to the history and domestic politics of their own countries. It can be shown that some of the accounts of the history and customs of neighbouring peoples, stored in the treatise of Constantine Porphyrogennetos referred to above (furnishing numerous facts not to be found anywhere else), were derived from barbarian ambassadors who visited Constantinople, and taken down by the imperial secretaries. We may conjecture with some See also:probability that the famous system of the Relazioni, which the Venetian government required from its ambassadors, goes back originally to Byzantine influence. Meliarakes, 'Iaropte roil BaeiX€tov ri3s Ntsalas sal roil 5EU7roTQTOV T'qS 'H7rstpov (1898) ; Gerland, Geschichte See also:des lateinischen Kaiserreiches von Konstantinopel (part i., 1905) ; See also:Fallmerayer, Geschichte des Kaisertums Trapezunt (1827); See also:Norden, Das Papsttum and Byzanz (1903); See also:Pears, The Fall of Constantinople, being the See also:story of the Fourth Crusade (1885), and The Destruction of the Greek Empire (1903). (J. B. Additional information and CommentsThere are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click, and select "copy." Then paste it into your website, email, or other HTML. Site content, images, and layout Copyright © 2006 - Net Industries, worldwide. |
|
[back] ROMAN DE LA ROSE |
[next] ROMAN EMPIRE, LATER |