Online Encyclopedia

Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.

GREEK LITERATURE

Online Encyclopedia
Originally appearing in Volume V12, Page 520 of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica.
Spread the word: del.icio.us del.icio.us it!

See also:

GREEK LITERATURE .—The literature of the Greek See also:language is broadly divisible into three See also:main sections: (I) See also:Ancient, (2) See also:Byzantine, (3) See also:Modern. These are dealt with below in that See also:order. I. THE ANCIENT GREEK- LITERATURE The ancient literature falls into three periods: (A) The See also:Early Literature, to about 475 B.C.; epic, elegiac, See also:iambic and lyric See also:poetry; the beginnings of See also:literary See also:prose. (B) The See also:Attic Literature 475–300 B.C.; tragic and comic See also:drama; See also:historical, oratorical and philosophical prose. (C) The Literature of the Decadence, 30o B.C. to A.D. 529; which may again be divided into the Alexandrian See also:period, 300–146 B.C., and the Graeco-See also:Roman period, 146 B.C. to A.D. 529. For details regarding particular See also:works or the lives of their authors reference should be made to the See also:separate articles devoted to the See also:principal Greek writers. The See also:object of the following pages is to See also:sketch the literary development as a whole, to show how its successive periods were related to each other, and to See also:mark the dominant characteristics of each. (A) The Early Literature.—A See also:process of natural growth may be traced through all the best See also:work of the Greek See also:genius. The Greeks were not literary imitators of See also:foreign See also:models; the forms of poetry and prose in which they attained to such unequalled excellence were first See also:developed by themselves.

Their literature had its roots in their See also:

political and social See also:life; it is the spontaneous expression of that life in youth, maturity and decay; and the order in which its several fruits are produced is not the result of See also:accident or caprice. Further, the old Greek literature has a striking completeness, due to the fact that each See also:great See also:branch of the Hellenic See also:race See also:bore a characteristic See also:part in its development. See also:Ionians, Aeolians, See also:Dorians, in turn contributed their See also:share. Each See also:dialect corresponded to a certain aspect of Hellenic life and See also:character. Each found its appropriate work. The Ionians on the See also:coast of See also:Asia See also:Minor—a lively and genial See also:people, delighting in See also:adventure, and keenly sensitive to every- thing *See also:bright and joyous—created See also:artistic epic poetry The d/ateets. out of the See also:lays in which Aeolic minstrels sang of the old Achaean See also:wars. And among the Ionians arose elegiac poetry, the first variation on the epic type. These found a fitting See also:instrument in the harmonious Ionic dialect, the flexible utterance of a See also:quick and versatile intelligence. The Aeolians of See also:Lesbos next created the lyric of See also:personal See also:passion, in which the traits of their race—its chivalrous See also:pride, its bold but sensuous See also:fancy—found a fitting See also:voice in the fiery strength and tenderness of Aeolic speech. The See also:Doria.ns of the See also:Peloponnesus, See also:Sicily and Magna Graecia then perfected the choral lyric for festivals and religious See also:worship; and here again an See also:earnest faith, a strong pride in Dorian usage and renown had an See also:apt- interpreter in the massive and sonorous Doric. Finally, the Attic branch of the Ionian stock produced the drama, blending elements of all the other kinds, and developed an artistic literary prose in See also:history, See also:oratory and See also:philosophy. It is in the Attic literature that the Greek mind receives its most See also:complete See also:interpretation.

A natural See also:

affinity was See also:felt to exist between each dialect and that See also:species of See also:composition for which it had been specially used. Hence the dialect of the Ionian epic poets would be adopted with more or less thoroughness even by epic or elegiac poets who were not Ionians. Thus the Aeolian See also:Hesiod uses it in epos, the Dorian Theognis in See also:elegy, though not without alloy. Similarly, the Dorian See also:Theocritus wrote love-songs in Aeolic. All the faculties and tones of the language were thus gradually brought out by the co-operation of the dialects. Old Greek literature has an essential unity—the unity of a living organism; and this unity comprehends a number of distinct types, each of which is complete in its own See also:kind. Extant Greek literature begins with the Homeric poems. These are works of See also:art which imply a See also:long period of antecedent poetical cultivation. Of the pre-Homeric poetry we have no remains, and very little knowledge. Such Pre-glimpses as we get of it connect it with two different Hoinerk poetry. tr y. e stages in the See also:religion of the prehistoric Hellenes. The first of these stages is that in which the agencies or forms of See also:external nature were personified indeed, yet with the consciousness that the personal names were only symbols.

Some very ancient Greek songs of which mention is made may have belonged to this See also:

stage—as the songs of See also:Linus, rare Ialemus and See also:Hylas. Linus, the See also:fair youth killed by the Y seasons. See also:dogs, seems to be the See also:spring passing away before Sirius. Such songs have been aptly called " songs of the seasons." The second stage is that in which the Hellenes have now definitively personified the See also:powers which they worship. See also:Apollo, See also:Demeter, See also:Dionysus, See also:Cybele, have now become to them beings with clearly conceived attributes. To this second stage belong the See also:hymns connected with the names of the legendary Kymns, bards, such as See also:Orpheus, See also:Musaeus, See also:Eumolpus, who are themselves associated with the worship of the Pierian See also:Muses and the Attic See also:ritual of Demeter. The seats of this early sacred poetry are not only "Thracian "—i.e. on the See also:borders of See also:northern See also:Greece—but also " Phrygian " and " Cretan." It belongs, that is, presumably to an See also:age when the ancestors of the Hellenes had See also:left the Indo-See also:European See also:home in central Asia, but had not yet taken full See also:possession of the lands which were afterwards Hellenic. Some of their tribes were still in Asia; others were settling in the islands of the See also:Aegean; others were passing through the lands on its northern seaboard. If there was a period when the Greeks possessed no poetry but hymns forming part of a religious ritual, it may be conjectured that it was not of long duration. Already in the Iliad a See also:secular character belongs to the See also:marriage hymn and to the See also:dirge for the dead, which in ancient See also:India were chanted by the See also:priest. The See also:bent of the Greeks was to claim poetry and See also:music as public joys; they would not long have suffered them to remain sacerdotal mysteries. And among the earliest themes on which the See also:lay artist in poetry was employed were probably See also:war-See also:ballads, sung by minstrels in the houses of the chiefs whose ancestors they celebrated.

Such war-ballads were the materials from which the earliest epic poetry of Greece was constructed. By an " epic " poem the Greeks meant a narrative of heroic See also:

action in epos See also:hexameter See also:verse. The See also:term Emi meant at first simply " verses "; it acquired its See also:special meaning only when tAXri, lyric songs set to music, came to be distinguished from C7r?j, verses not set to music, but merely recited. Epic poetry is the only kind of extant Greek poetry which is older than about 700 B.C. The early epos of Greece is represented by the Iliad and the Odyssey, Hesiod and the Homeric hymns; also by some fragments of the " Cyclic " poets. After the Dorian See also:conquest of the Peloponnesus, the Aeolian emigrants who settled in the See also:north-See also:west of Asia Minor brought with them the warlike legends of their chiefs, the Achaean princes of old. These legends lived in the The h'Ienad" ballads of the Aeolic minstrels, and from them passed Odyssey." southward into See also:Ionia, where the Ionian poets gradually shaped them into higher artistic forms. Among the seven places which claimed to be the birthplace of See also:Homer, that which has the best See also:title is See also:Smyrna. Homer himself is called " son of Meles "—the stream which flowed through old Smyrna, on the border between Aeolia and Ionia. The tradition is significant in regard to the origin and character of the Iliad, for in the Iliad we have Achaean ballads worked up by Ionian art. A preponderance of See also:evidence is in favour of the view that the Odyssey also, at least in its earliest See also:form, was composed on the Ionian coast of Asia Minor. According to the Spartan See also:account, See also:Lycurgus was the first to bring to Greece a complete copy of the Homeric poems, which he had obtained from the Creophylidae, a See also:clan or gild of poets in See also:Samos.

A better authenticated tradition connects See also:

Athens with early attempts to preserve the See also:chief poetical treasure of the nation. See also:Peisistratus is said to have charged some learned men with the task of See also:collecting all " the poems of Homer "; but it is difficult to decide how much was comprehended under this last phrase, or whether the See also:province of the See also:commission went beyond the See also:mere task of collecting. Nor can it be deter-See also:mined what exactly it was that See also:Solon and See also:Hipparchus respectively did for the Homeric poems. Solon, it has been thought, enacted that the poems should be recited from an authorized See also:text (E>; ioroi3oXrls); Hipparchus, that they should be recited in a See also:regular order (EE vtroXit ' ws). At any See also:rate, we know that in the 6th See also:century B.C. a recitation of the poems of Homer was one of the established competitions at the See also:Panathenaea, held once in four years. The reciter was called a See also:rhapsodist—properly one who weaves a long, smoothly-flowing See also:chant, then an epic poet who chants his own or another's poem. The rhapsodist did not, like the early See also:minstrel, use the See also:accompaniment of the See also:harp; he gave the verses in a flowing recitative, bearing in his See also:hand a branch of See also:laurel, the See also:symbol of Apollo's See also:inspiration. In the 5th century B.C. we find that various Greek cities had their own See also:editions (al aoXtrtKal, Kara 7roXets or EK iroXewv E KSSaeL1) of the poems, for recitation at their festivals. Among these were the editions of Massilia, of See also:Chios and of Argolis. There were also editions bearing the name of the individual editor (al Kar' avSpa)—the best known being that which See also:Aristotle prepared for See also:Alexander. The recension of the poems by See also:Aristarchus (156 B.C.) became the See also:standard one, and is probably that on which the existing text is based. The See also:oldest Homeric MS. extant, Venetus A of the Iliad, is of the loth century; the first printed edition of Homer was that edited by the Byzantine See also:Demetrius Chalcondyles (See also:Florence, 1488).

The ancient Greeks were almost unanimous in believing the Iliad and the Odyssey to be the work of one See also:

man, Homer, to whom they also ascribed some extant hymns, and probably much more besides. Aristotle and Aristarchus seem to have put Homer's date about 1044 B.C., See also:Herodotus about 85o a.c. It is not till about 170 B.C. that the grammarians See also:Hellanicus and Xenon put forward the view that Homer was the author of the Iliad, but not of the Odyssey. Those who followed them in assigning different authors to the two poems were called the Separators (See also:Chorizontes). Aristarchus combated " the See also:paradox of Xenon," and it does not seem to have had much See also:acceptance in antiquity. Giovanni Battista See also:Vico, a Neapolitan (1668–1744), seems to have been the first modern to suggest the composite authorship and oral tradition of the Homeric poems; but this was a pure conjecture in support of his theory that the names of ancient lawgivers and poets are often mere symbols. F. A. See also:Wolf, in the Prolegomena to his edition (1795), was the founder of a scientific See also:scepticism. The Iliad, he said (for he recognized the 'See also:comparative unity and consistency of the Odyssey), was pieced together from many small unwritten poems by various hands, and was first committed to See also:writing in the See also:time of Peisistratus. This view was in See also:harmony with the See also:tone of See also:German See also:criticism at the time; it was welcomed as a new testimony to the superiority of popular poetry, springing from fresh natural See also:sources, to elaborate works of art; and it at once found enthusiastic adherents. For the course of Homeric controversy since Wolf the reader is referred to the See also:article HOMER.

The Ionian school of epos produced a number of poems founded on the legends of the Trojan war, and intended as introductions or continuations to the Iliad and the ten years between the Iliad and the Odyssey; the Lay of Telegonus, by Eugammon of See also:

Cyrene, continued the See also:story of the Odyssey to the See also:death of See also:Odysseus by the hand of Telegonus, the son .whom See also:Circe bore to him. Similarly the See also:Cyprian Lays by See also:Stasinus of See also:Cyprus, ascribed by others to Hegesias (or Hegesinus) of See also:Salamis or See also:Halicarnassus, was See also:introductory to the Iliad; the Aethiopis and the See also:Sack of See also:Troy, by See also:Arctinus of See also:Miletus, and the Little Iliad, by See also:Lesches of Mytilene, were supplementary to it. These and many other names of lost epics—some taken also from the Theban myths (Thebais, See also:Epigoni, Oedipodea)—serve to show how prolific was that epic school of which only two great examples remain. The name of epic See also:cycle was properly applied to a prose compilation of abstracts from these epics, pieced together in the order of the events. The compilers were called " cyclic " writers; and the term has now been transferred to the epic poets whom they used.' The epic poetry of Ionia celebrated the great deeds of heroes in the old wars. But in Greece proper there arose another school of epos, which busied itself with religious See also:lore Hesiodk and ethical precepts, especially in relation to the rural epos, life of See also:Boeotia. This school is represented by the name of Hesiod. The See also:legend spoke of him as vanquishing Homer in a poetical contest of See also:Chalcis in See also:Euboea; and it expresses the fact that, to the old Greek mind, these two names stood for two contrasted epic types. Nothing is certainly known of his date, except that it must have been subsequent to the maturity of Ionian epos. He is conjecturally placed about 850–80o B.C.; but some would refer him to the early part of the 7th century B.C. His home was at Ascra, a See also:village in a valley under See also:Helicon, whither his See also:father had migrated from Cyme in See also:Aeolis on the coast of Asia Minor. In Hesiod's Works and Days we have the earliest example of a didactic poem.

The seasons and the labours of the Boeotian See also:

farmer's See also:year are followed by a See also:list of the days which are lucky or unlucky for work. The Theogony, or " Origin of the Gods," describes first how the visible order of nature arose out of See also:chaos; next, how the gods were See also:born. Though it never possessed the character of a sacred See also:book, it remained a standard authority on the genealogies of the gods. So far as a corrupt and confused text warrants a See also:judgment, the poet was piecing together—not always intelligently—the fragments of a very old cosmogonic See also:system, using for this purpose both the hymns preserved in the temples and the myths which lived in See also:folklore. The epic lay in 48o lines called the See also:Shield of Heracles—partly imitated from the 18th book of the Iliad—is the work of an author or authors later than Hesiod. In the Hesiodic poetry, as represented by the Works and Days and the Theogony, we see the See also:influence of the See also:temple at See also:Delphi. Hesiod recognizes the existence of Saiµoves—See also:spirits of the departed who haunt the See also:earth as the invisible guardians of See also:justice; and he connects the See also:office of the poet with that of the See also:prophet. The poet is one whom the gods have authorized to impress See also:doctrine and See also:practical duties on men. A religious purpose was essentially characteristic of the Hesiodic school. Its poets treated the old legends as See also:relics of a sacred history, and not merely, in the Ionian manner, as subjects of idealizing art. Such titles as the See also:Maxims of Cheiron and the Lay of See also:Melampus, the seer—lost poems of the Hesiodic school—illustrate its ethical and its mystic tendencies. The Homeric Hymns are a collection of pieces, some of them very See also:short, in hexameter verse.

Their traditional title is—Hymns or Preludes of Homer and tEie Homeridae. The second of the alternative designations is the true one. The HomeNc The pieces are not " hymns " used in formal worship, hymns. but " preludes " or prefatory addresses (irpooiµta) with which the rhapsodists ushered in their recitations of epic poetry. The " prelude " might be addressed to the presiding See also:

god of the festival, or to any See also:local deity whom the reciter wished to See also:honour. The pieces (of which there are 33) range in date perhaps from 750 to 500 B.C. (though some authorities assign See also:dates as See also:late as the 3rd and 4th centuries A.D.; see ed. by Sikes and See also:Allen, e.g. p. 228), and it is probable that the collection was ' For authorities and criticisms see T. W. Allen in Classical Quarterly (See also:Jan. and See also:April 1908), The Homeric question. cyclic Odyssey. The grammarian See also:Proclus (A.D. 140) has poems.

preserved the names and subjects of some of these; but the' fragments are very scanty. The Nostoi or Homeward Voyages, by Agias (or Hagias) of Troezen, filled up the See also:

gap of formed in See also:Attica, for the use of rhapsodists. The See also:style is that of the Ionian or Homeric epos; but there are also several traces of the Hesiodic or Boeotian school. The principal " hymns " are (I) to Apollo (generally treated as two or more hymns combined in one); (2) to See also:Hermes; (3) to See also:Aphrodite; and (4) to Demeter. The hymn to Apollo, quoted by See also:Thucydides (iii. 104) as Homer's, is of See also:peculiar See also:interest on account of the lines describing the Ionian festival at See also:Delos. Two celebrated pieces of a sportive kind passed under Homer's name. The Margitesa comic poem on one " who knew many things but knew them all badly "—is regarded by Aristotle as the earliest germ of See also:comedy, and was possibly as old as 700 B.C. Only a few lines remain. The Batracho(myo)machia, or See also:Battle of the Frogs and Mice probably belongs to the decline of Greek literature, perhaps to the 2nd century B.C.' About 300 verses of it are extant. In the Iliad and the Odyssey the personal opinions or sympathies of the poet may sometimes be conjectured, but they are Trans!. not declared or even hinted. Hesiod, indeed, sometion from times gives us a glimpse of his own troubles or views.

epos to Yet Hesiod is, on the whole, essentially a prophet. elegy. The See also:

message which he delivers is not from himself; the truths which he imparts have not been discovered by his own See also:search. He is the See also:mouthpiece of the Delphian Apollo. Personal See also:opinion and feeling may tinge his utterance, but they do not determine its See also:general complexion. The egotism is a single See also:thread; it is not the basis of the texture. Epic poetry was in Greece the See also:foundation of all other poetry; for many centuries no other kind was generally cultivated, no other could speak to the whole people. Politically, the age was monarchical or aristocratic; intellectually, it was too See also:simple for the See also:analysis of thought or emotion. See also:Kings and princes loved to hear of the great deeds of their ancestors; See also:common men loved to hear of them too, for they had no other interest. The mind of Greece found no subject of contemplation so attractive as the warlike past of the race, or so useful as that lore which experience and tradition had bequeathed. But in the course of the 8th century B.C. the See also:rule of hereditary princes began to disappear. See also:Monarchy gave See also:place to See also:oligarchy, and this—often after the intermediate phase of a tyrannis—to See also:democracy.

Such a See also:

change was necessarily favourable to the growth of reflection. The private See also:citizen is no longer a mere See also:cipher, the Homeric -rnr, a unit in the dim multitude of the See also:king-ruled folk; he gains more See also:power of See also:independent action, his See also:mental See also:horizon is widened, his life becomes See also:fuller and more interesting. He begins to feel the need of expressing the thoughts and feelings that are stirred in him. But as yet a prose literature does not exist; the new thoughts, like the old heroic stories, must still be told in verse. The forms of verse created by this need were the Elegiac and the Iambic. The elegiac See also:metre is, in form, a simple variation on the epic metre, obtained by docking the second of two hexameters so as elegy. to make it a verse of five feet or See also:measures. But -the poetical capabilities of the elegiac See also:couplet are of a wholly different kind from those of heroic verse. EXeyor seems to be the Greek form of a name given by the Carians and Lydians to a lament for the dead. This was accompanied by the soft music of the Lydian See also:flute, which continued to be associated with Greek elegy. The non-Hellenic origin of elegy is indicated by this very fact. The flute was to the Greeks an See also:Asiatic instrument—See also:string See also:instruments were those which they made their own —and it would hardly have been wedded by them to a species of poetry which had arisen among themselves. The early elegiac poetry of Greece was by no means confined to See also:mourning for the dead.

War, love, politics, proverbial philosophy, were in turn its themes; it dealt, in fact, with the chief interest of the poet and his See also:

friends, whatever that might be at the time. It is the See also:direct expression of the poet's own thoughts, addressed to a sympathizing society. This is its first characteristic. The second is that, even when most pathetic or most spirited, it still preserves, on the whole, the tone of conversation or of ' Others attribute it, as well as the Margites, to Pigres of Hallcarnassus, the supposed See also:brother of the Carian See also:queen See also:Artemisia, who fought on the See also:side of See also:Xerxes at the battle of Salamis.narrative. Greek elegy stops short of lyric passion. See also:English elegy, whether funereal as in See also:Dryden and See also:Pope, or reflective as in See also:Gray, is usually true to the same normal type. Roman elegy is not equally true to it, but sometimes tends to See also:trench on the lyric province. For Roman elegy is mainly amatory or sentimental; and its masters imitated, as a rule, not the early Greek elegists, not See also:Tyrtaeus or Theognis, but the later Alexandrian elegists, such as See also:Callimachus or See also:Philetas. See also:Catullus introduced the metre to Latin literature, and used it with more fidelity than his followers to its genuine Greek inspiration. Elegy, as we have seen, was the first slight deviation from epos. But almost at the same time another species arose which had nothing in common with epos, either in form or in spirit. This was the iambic.

The word ZaµOos+ Iambic verse. iambus (See also:

harrow, to dart or shoot) was used in reference to the licensed raillery at the festivals of Demeter; it was the See also:maiden Iambe, the myth said, who See also:drew the first smile from the mourning goddess. The iambic metre was at first used for See also:satire; and it was in this See also:strain that it was chiefly employed by its earliest See also:master of See also:note, See also:Archilochus of See also:Paros (67o B.c.). But it was adapted to the expression generally of any pointed thought. Thus it was suitable to fables. Elegiac and iambic poetry both belong to the borderland between epic and lyric. While, however, elegy stands nearer to epos, iambic stands nearer to the lyric. Iambic poetry can See also:express the personal feeling of the poet with greater intensity than elegy does; on the other hand, it has not the lyric flexibility, self-See also:abandonment or glow. As we see in the See also:case of Solon, iambic verse could serve for the expression of that deeper thought, that more inward self-communing, for which the elegiac form would have been inappropriate. But these two forms of poetry, both Ionian, the elegiac and the iambic, belong essentially to the same stage of the literature. They stand between the Ionian epos and the lyric poetry of the Aeolians and Dorians. The earliest of the Greek elegists, See also:Callinus and Tyrtaeus, use elegy to rouse a warlike spirit in sinking See also:hearts. Archilochus too wrote warlike elegy, but used it also in other strains, as in lament for the dead.

The elegy of See also:

Mimnermus of Smyrna or See also:Colophon is the plaintive farewell of an ease-loving Ionian to the days of Ionian freedom. In Solon elegy takes a higher range; it becomes political and ethical.2 Theognis represents the maturer See also:union of politics with a proverbial philosophy. Another gnomic poet was See also:Phocylides of Miletus; an admonitory poem extant under his name is probably the work of an Alexandrine Jewish See also:Christian. See also:Xenophanes gives a philosophic strain to elegy. With See also:Simonides of See also:Ceos it reverts, in an exquisite form, to its earliest destination, and becomes the vehicle of See also:epitaph on those who See also:fell in the See also:Persian Wars. Iambic verse was used by Simonides (or Semonides) of Amorgus, as by Archilochus, for satire—but satire directed against classes rather than persons. Solon's iambics so far preserve the old associations of the metre that they represent the polemical or controversial side of his political poetry. Hipponax of See also:Ephesus was another iambic satirist—using the oKc4cev (" limping ") or choliambic verse, produced by substituting a spondee for an iambus in the last place. But it was not until the rise of the Attic drama that the full capabilities of iambic verse were seen. The lyric poetry of early Greece may be regarded as the final form of that effort at self-expression which in the elegiac and iambic is still incomplete. The lyric expression is deeper and more impassioned. Its intimate union with music and with the rhythmical See also:movement of the See also:dance gives to it more of an ideal character.

'At the same time the,continuity of the music permits pauses to the voice—'pauses necessary as reliefs after a See also:

climax. Before lyric poetry could be effective, it was necessary that some progress should have been made in the art of music. The instrument used by the Greeks to accompany the voice was the four-stringed See also:lyre, and the first great See also:epoch in Greek music was when See also:Terpander of Lesbos (66o B.C.), by adding three strings, gave the lyre the 2 The extant fragments of Solon have been augmented by lengthy quotations in the Constitution of Athens. Lyric poetry. See also:compass of the See also:octave. Further improvements are ascribed to See also:Olympus and Thaletas. By 500 B.C. Greek music had probably acquired all the powers of expression which the lyric poet could demand. The period of Greek lyric poetry may be roughly defined as from 67o to 440 B.C. Two different parts in its development were taken by the Aeolians and the Dorians. The lyric poetry of the Aeolians—especially of Lesbos—was essentially the utterance of personal feeling, and was usually intended for a single voice, not for a See also:chorus. Lesbos, Aeolian in the 7th century B.C., had attained some See also:naval school.

and commercial importance. But the strife of oligarchy and democracy was active; the Lesbian nobles were often driven by revolution to See also:

exchange their luxurious home-life for the hardships of See also:exile. It is such a life of contrasts and excitements, working on a sensuous and fiery temperament, that is reflected in the fragments of See also:Alcaeus. In these glimpses of war and love, of anxiety for the See also:storm-tossed See also:state and of careless festivity, there is much of the See also:cavalier spirit; if Archilochus is in certain aspects a Greek See also:Byron, Alcaeus might be compared to See also:Lovelace. The other great representative of the Aeolian lyric is See also:Sappho, the only woman of Greek race who is known to have possessed poetical genius of the first order. Intensity and See also:melody are the characteristics of the fragments that remain to us.' Probably no poet ever surpassed Sappho as an interpreter of passion in exquisitely subtle harmonies of form and See also:sound. See also:Anacreon of Teos, in Ionia, may be classed with the Aeolian lyrists in so far as the See also:matter and form of his work resembled theirs, though the dialect in which he wrote was mainly the Ionian. A few fragments remain from his hymns to the gods, from love-poems and festive songs. The collection of sixty short pieces which passes current under his name date only from the loth century. The short poems which it comprises are of various age and authorship, probably ranging in date from c. 200 B.C. to A.D. 400 or 500.

They have not the pure style, the flexible See also:

grace, or the sweetness of the classical fragments; but the verses, though somewhat See also:mechanical, are often See also:pretty. The Dorian lyric poetry, in contrast with the Aeolian, had more of a public than of a personal character, and was for the Doman most part choral. Hymns or choruses for the public school. worship of the gods, and odes to be sung at festivals on occasions of public interest, were its characteristic forms. Its central inspiration was the pride of the Dorians in the Dorian past, if, their traditions of worship, See also:government and social usage. The history of the Dorian lyric poetry does not See also:present us with vivid ekpressions of personal character, like those of Alcaeus and Sappho, but rather with a See also:series of artists whose names are associated with improvements of form. Thus See also:Alcman,(the Doric form of Alemaeon; 66o B.C.) is said to have introduced the balanced movement of See also:strophe and See also:antistrophe. See also:Stesichorus, of See also:Himera in Sicily, added the See also:epode, sung by the chorus while stationary after these movements; See also:Arlon of Methymna in Lesbos gave a finished form to the choral hymn (" dithyramb ") in honour of Dionysus, and organized the " cyclic " or circular chorus which sang it at the See also:altar. See also:Ibycus of Rhegium (c. S40) wrote choral lyrics after Stesichorus and glowing love-songs in the Aeolic style. The See also:culmination of the lyric poetry is marked by two great names, Simonides and See also:Pindar. Simonides (556–468) was an See also:Ioo.ian of the See also:island of Ceos, but his lyrics belonged by lyrist whose significance is not merely Aeolian or Dorian but Panhellenic. The same character belongs even more completely to his younger contemporary.

Pindar (518–c. 443) was born in Boeotia of a Dorian stock; thus, as Ionian and Dorian elements meet in Simonides, so Dorian and Aeolian elements meet in Pindar. Simonides was perhaps the most See also:

tender and most exquisite of the lyric poets. Pindar was the boldest, the most fervid and the most sublirne. His extant fragments2 represent almost every branch of the lyric art. But he is known to us mainly by See also:forty-four Epinicia, or odes of victory, for the Olympian, Pythian, Nemean and Isthmian festivals. The general characteristic of the treatment is that the particular victory is made the occasion of introducing heroic legends connected with the See also:family or See also:city of the See also:victor, and of inculcating the moral lessons which they See also:teach. No Greek lyric poetry can be completely appreciated apart from the music, now lost, to which it was set. Pindar's odes were, further, essentially occasional poems; they abound in allusions of which the effect is partly or wholly lost on us; and the glories which they celebrate belong to a life which we can but imperfectly realize. Of all the great Greek poets, Pindar is perhaps the one to whom it is hardest for us to do justice; yet we can at least recognize his splendour of See also:imagination, his strong rapidity and his soaring See also:flight. See also:Bacchylides of Ceos (c. 504-430), the youngest of the three great lyric poets and See also:nephew of Simonides, was known only by scanty fragments until the See also:discovery of nineteen poems on an See also:Egyptian See also:papyrus in 1896.

They consist of thirteen (or fourteen) epinicia, two of which celebrate the same victories as two odes of Pindar. The papyrus also contains six odes for the festivals of gods or heroes. The poems contain valuable See also:

information on the See also:court life of the time and legendary history. Bacchylides, the little " Cean See also:nightingale," is inferior to his great See also:rival Pindar, " the See also:Swan of See also:Dirce," in originality and splendour of language, but he writes simply and elegantly, while his excellent yvwµai attracted readers of a philosophical turn of mind, amongst them the See also:emperor See also:Julian. Similarly, the scanty fragments of See also:Timotheus of Miletus (d. 357), musical composer and poet, and inventor of the eleven-stringed lyre, were increased by the discovery in 1902 of some 25o lines of his " See also:nome " the Persae, written after the manner of Terpander. The beginning is lost; the See also:middle describes the battle of Salamis; the end is of a personal nature. The papyrus is the oldest Greek MS. and belongs to the age of Alexander the Great. The language is frequently very obscure, and the whole is a specimen of lyric poetry in its decline. (B) The Attic Literature.—The Ionians of Asia Minor, the Aeolians and the Dorians had now performed their special parts in the development of Greek literature. Epic poetry had interpreted the heroic legends of warlike deeds done by See also:Zeus-nourished kings and chiefs. Then, as the individual life became more and more elegiac and iambic poetry had become the social expression of that life in all its varied interests and feelings.

Lastly, lyric poetry had arisen to satisfy a twofold need—to be the more intense utterance of personal emotion, or to give choral voice, at stirring moments, to the faith or fame, the See also:

triumph or the sorrow, of a city or a race. A new form of poetry was now to be created, with elements borrowed from all the See also:rest. And this was to be achieved by the people of Attica, in whose character and language the distinctive traits of an Ionian descent were tempered with some of the best qualities of the Dorian stock. The drama (q.v.) arose from the festivals of Dionysus, the god of See also:wine, which were held at intervals from the beginning of See also:winter to the beginning of spring. A See also:troop of rustic worshippers would gather around the altar of the god, and sing a hymn in his honour, telling of his victories or sufferings in his progress over the earth. " Tragedy " meant " the See also:goat-See also:song," a goat (rpeyos) being sacrificed to Dionysus before the hymn was sung. " Comedy," " the village-song," is the same hymn regarded as an occasion for 2 Recently increased by specimens of the Partheneia (choral songs for maidens) and paeans. Slmonides form to the choral Dorian school. Many of his subjects and Radar. were taken from the events of the Persian wars: his epitaphs on those who fell at See also:Thermopylae and Salamis were celebrated. In him the lyric art of the Dorians is interpreted by Ionian genius, and Athens—where part of his life was passed—is the point at which they meet. Simonides is the first Greek' 1 Since the above was written, four considerable fragments generally assigned to Sappho have been discovered: a See also:prayer to the Nereids for the safe return of her brother Charaxus; the leave-taking of a favourite See also:pupil; a greeting to See also:Atthis, one of her friends, in See also:Lydia; the See also:fourth, much mutilated, addressed to another pupil, Gongyla. They are of great beauty and throw considerable See also:light on the See also:personality of Sappho and the language and metre of her poems.

Origin of drama. Tragedy. rustic jest. Then the See also:

leader of the chorus would assume the part of a messenger from Dionysus, or even that of the god himself, and recite an adventure to the worshippers, who made choral response. The next step was to arrange a See also:dialogue between the leader(icopvcaZos, See also:coryphaeus) and one chosen member of the chorus, hence called " the answerer " (&iroxpiric, hypocrites, afterwards the See also:ordinary word for " actor "). This last improvement is ascribed to the Attic See also:Thespis (about 536 B.C.). The elements of drama were now ready. The choral hymn to Dionysus (the " dithyramb ") had received an artistic form from the Dorians; dialogue, though only between the leader of the chorus and a single actor, had been introduced in Attica. Phrynichus, an Athenian, celebrated in this manner some events of the Persian Wars; but in his " drama " there was still only one actor. See also:Choerilus of Athens and See also:Pratinas of Phlius, who belonged to the same period, developed the satyric drama; Pratinas also wrote tragedies, dithyrambs, and hyporchemata (lively choral odes chiefly in honour of Apollo). See also:Aeschylus (born 525 B.c.) became the real founder of tragedy by introducing a second actor, and thus rendering the dialogue Aeschylus. independent of the chorus. At the same time the choral song—hitherto the principal part of the per- formance—became subordinate to the dialogue; and drama was mature.

Aeschylus is also said to have made various improvements of detail in See also:

costume and the like; and it was early in his career that the See also:theatre of Dionysus under the See also:acropolis was commenced—the first permanent home of Greek drama, in place of the temporary wooden platforms which had hitherto been used. The system of the " trilogy " and the " tetralogy " is further ascribed to Aeschylus, the " trilogy " being properly a series of three tragedies connected in subject, such as the See also:Agamemnon, Choephori, See also:Eumenides, which together form the Oresteia, or Story of See also:Orestes. The " tetralogy " is such a triad with a " satyric drama " added—that is, a drama in which " See also:satyrs," the See also:grotesque woodland beings who attended on Dionysus, formed the chorus, as in the earlier dithyramb from which drama sprang. The Cyclops of See also:Euripides is the only extant specimen of a satyric drama. In the seven tragedies which alone remain of the seventy which Aeschylus is said to have composed, the forms of kings and heroes have a grandeur which is truly Homeric; there is a spirit of Panhellenic patriot- ism such as the Persian Wars in which he fought might well quicken in a soldier-poet; and, pervading all, there is a strain of speculative thought which seeks to reconcile the apparent conflicts between the gods of See also:heaven and of the underworld by the doctrine that both alike, constrained by See also:necessity, are work- See also:sophocles. See also:ing out the See also:law of righteousness. Sophocles, who was born See also:thirty years after Aeschylus (495 B.C.), is the most perfect artist of the ancient drama. No one before or after him gave to Greek tragedy so high a degree of ideal beauty, or appreciated so finely the possibilities and the limitations of its See also:sphere. He excels especially in See also:drawing character; his See also:Antigone, his See also:Ajax, his See also:Oedipus—indeed, all the chief persons of his dramas —are typical studies in the great See also:primary emotions of human nature. He gave a freer See also:scope to tragic dialogue by adding a third actor; and in one of his later plays, the Oedipus at Colonus, a fourth actor is required. From the time when he won the tragic See also:prize against Aeschylus in 468 to his death in 405 B.C. he was the favourite dramatist of Athens; and for us he is not only a great dramatist, but also the most spiritual representative of the age of See also:Pericles. The distinctive interest of Euripides is of Eurlpldes. another kind.

He was only fifteen years younger than Sophocles; but when he entered on his poetical career, the old inspirations of tragedy were already failing. Euripides marks a period of transition in the tragic art, and is, in fact, the mediator between the classical and the romantic drama. The myths and traditions with which the See also:

elder dramatists had dealt no longer commanded an unquestioning faith. Euripides himself was imbued with the new intellectual scepticism of the See also:day; and the speculative views which were conflicting in his own mind are reflected in his plays. He had much picturesque and pathetic power; he was a master of expression; and he shows ingenuity in devising fresh resources for tragedy—especially in his management of the choral songs. Aeschylus is Panhellenic, Sophocles is Athenian, Euripides is See also:cosmopolitan. He stands nearer to the modern See also:world than either of his predecessors; and though with him Attic tragedy loses its highest beauty, it acquires new elements of See also:familiar human interest. In Attica, as in See also:England, a period of rather less than fifty years sufficed for the complete development of the tragic art. The two distinctive characteristics of Athenian drama are its originality and its abundance. The Greeks of Attica were not the only inventors of drama, but they were the first people who made drama a complete work of art. And the great tragic poets of Attica were remarkably prolific. Aeschylus was the reputed author of 70 tragedies, Sophocles of 113, Euripides of 92; and there were others whose productiveness was equally great.

Comedy represented the lighter side, as tragedy the graver side, of the Dionysiac worship; it was the joy of spring following the gloom of winter. The process of growth was comedy. nearly the same as in tragedy; but the Dorians, not the Ionians of Attica, were the first who added dialogue to the comic chorus. See also:

Susarion, a Dorian of See also:Megara, exhibited, about 580 B.C., pieces of the kind known as " Megarian farces." See also:Epicharmus of See also:Cos (who settled at See also:Syracuse) gave literary form to the Doric See also:farce, and treated in See also:burlesque style the stories of gods and heroes, and subjects taken from everyday life. His Syracusan contemporary See also:Sophron (c. 450) was a famous writer of mimes, chiefly scenes from See also:low-class life. The most artistic form of comedy seems, however, to have been developed in Attica. The greatest names before See also:Aristophanes are those of See also:Cratinus and See also:Eupolis; but from about 470 B.C. there seems to have been a continuous See also:succession of comic dramatists,, amongst them See also:Plato Comicus, the author of 28 comedies, political satires and parodies after the style of the Middle Comedy. A Aristophanes came forward as a comic poet in B.C., 427 r p phahases. and retained his popularity for about forty years. He presents a perhaps unique union of bold fancy, exquisite See also:humour, See also:critical acumen and lyrical power. His eleven extant comedies may be divided into three See also:groups, according as the See also:licence of political satire becomes more and more restricted. In the Ackarnians, Knights, Clouds, Wasps and See also:Peace (425–421) the poet uses unrestrained freedom.

In the Birds, Lysistrata, Thesmophoriazusae and Frogs (414–405) a greater reserve may be perceived. Lastly, in the Ecclesiazusae and the See also:

Plutus (392–388) personal satire is almost wholly avoided. The same general tendency continued. The so-called " Middle Comedy " (390–320) represents the transition from the Old Comedy, or political satire, to satire of a literary or social nature; its chief writers were See also:Antiphanes of Athens and See also:Alexis of See also:Thurii. The " New Comedy " (320–25o) resembled the modern " comedy of See also:manners." Its chief representative was See also:Menander (342–291), the author of 105 comedies. Fragments have been discovered of seven of these, of sufficient length to give an See also:idea of their dramatic action. His plays were produced on the stage as late as the time of See also:Plutarch, and his yviaµ.ac, distinguished by worldly See also:wisdom, were issued in the form of anthologies, which enjoyed great popularity. Other prominent writers of this class were See also:Diphilus, See also:Philemon, See also:Posidippus and See also:Apollodorus of Carystus. About 330 B.C. See also:Rhinthon of See also:Tarentum revived the old Doric farce in his Hilarotragoediae or travesties of tragic stories. These successive periods cannot be sharply or precisely marked off. The change which gradually passed over the comic drama was simply the reflection of the change which passed over the political and social life of Athens.

The Old Comedy, as we see it in the earlier plays of Aristophanes, was probably the most powerful See also:

engine of public criticism that has ever existed in any community. Unsparing personality was its essence. The comic poet used this recognized right on an occasion at once festive and sacred, in a society where every man of any note was known by name and sight to the rest. The same thousands who heard a policy or a character denounced or lauded in the theatre might be required to pass See also:sentence on it in the popular See also:assembly or in the courts of law. The development of Greek poetry had been completed before a prose literature had begun to exist. The earliest name in extant Greek prose literature is that of Herodotus; passed its See also:prime. There had been, indeed, writers of prose before Herodotus; but there had not been, in the proper sense of the term, a prose literature. The causes of this comparatively late origin of Greek literary prose are independent of the question as to the time at which the art of writing began to be generally used for literary purposes. Epic poetry exercised for a very long period a See also:sovereign spell over the Greek mind. In it was deposited all that the race possessed of history, See also:theology, philosophy, oratory. Even after an age of reflection had begun, elegiac poetry, the first offshoot of epic, was, with iambic verse, the vehicle of much which among other races would have been committed to prose. The basis of Greek culture was essentially poetical.

A political cause worked in the same direction. In the Eastern monarchies the king was the centre of all, and the royal records afforded the elements of history from a remote date. The Greek nation was broken up into small states, each busied with its own affairs and its own men. It was the collision between the Greek and the See also:

barbarian world which first provided a See also:national subject for a Greek historian. The work of Herodotus, in its relation to Greek prose, is so far analogous to the Iliad in its relation to Greek poetry, that it is the earliest work of art, and that it bears a Panhellenic See also:stamp. The sense and the degree in which Herodotus was See also:original may be inferred from what is known of earlier prose-writers. For about a century before Herodotus there had been a series of writers in philosophy, See also:mythology, See also:geography and history. The earliest, or among the earliest, of the philosophical writers were Pherecydes of Syros (550 B.c.) and the Ionian Anaximenes and Anaximander. It is doubtful whether See also:Cadmus of Miletus, supposed to have been the first prose writer, was an historical personage. The Ionian writers, especially called ?oytryp64ot., " narrators in prose " (as distinguished from Eiroiowl, makers of verse), were those who compiled the myths, especially in genealogies, or who described foreign countries, their See also:physical features, usages and traditions. Hecataeus of Miletus (500 B.C.) is the best-known representative of the See also:logographi in both these branches. Hellanicus of Mytilene (450 B.C.), among whose works was a history of Attica, appears to have made a nearer approach to the character of a systematic historian.

Other logographi were See also:

Charon of See also:Lampsacus; Pherecydes of Leros, who wrote on the myths of early Attica; Hippys of Rhegium, the oldest writer on See also:Italy and Sicily; and Acusilaus of See also:Argos in Boeotia, author of genealogies (see LOGOGRAPHI, and GREECE: Ancient History, " Authorities "). Herodotus was born in 484 B.C.; and his history was probably not completed before the beginning of the Peloponnesian War (431 B.c.). His subject is the struggle between Greece See also:Hero- dotus. and Asia, which he deduces from the legendary See also:rape of the Argive to by Phoenicians, and traces down to the final victory of the Greeks over the invading See also:host of Xerxes. His literary kinship with the historical or See also:geographical writers who had preceded him is seen mainly in two things. First, though he draws a See also:line between the mythological and the historical age, he still holds that myths, as such, are worthy to be reported, and that in certain cases it is part of his See also:duty to See also:report them. Secondly, he follows the example of such writers as Hecataeus in describing the natural and social features of countries. He seeks to combine the part of the geographer or intelligent traveller with his proper part as historian. But when we turn from these minor traits to the larger aspects of his work, Herodotus stands forth as an artist whose conception and whose method were his own. His history has, an epic unity. Various as are the subordinate parts, the action narrated is one, great and complete; and the unity is due to this, that Herodotus refers all events of human history to the principle of divine See also:Nemesis. If Sophocles had told the story of Oedipus in the Oedipus Tyrannus alone, and had not added to it the Oedipus at Colonus,it would have been comparable to the story of Xerxes as told by Herodotus. Great as an artist, great too in the largeness of his historical conception, Herodotus fails chiefly by lack of insight into political cause and effect, and by a general silence in regard to the history of political institutions.

Both his strength and his weakness are seen most clearly when he is contrasted with that other historian who was strictly his contemporary and who yet seems divided from him by centuries. Thucydides was only thirteen years younger than Herodotus; but the intellectual space between the men is so great that they seem to belong to different ages. Herodotus is the Thacy• first artist in historical writing; Thucydides is the dides. first thinker. Herodotus interweaves two threads of See also:

causation—human agency, represented by the See also:good or See also:bad qualities of men, and divine agency, represented by the vigilance of the gods on behalf of justice. Thucydides concentrates his See also:attention on the human agency (without, however, denying the other), and strives to trace its exact course. The subject of Thucydides is the Peloponnesian War. In resolving to write its history, he was moved, he says, by these considerations. It was probably the greatest movement which had ever affected Hellas collectively. It was possible for him as a contemporary to See also:record it with approximate accuracy. And this record was likely to have a general value, over and above its particular interest as a record, seeing that the political future was likely to resemble the political past. This is what Thucydides means when he calls his work " a possession for ever." The speeches which he ascribes to the persons of the history are, as regards form, his own essays in See also:rhetoric of the school to which See also:Antiphon belongs. As regards matter, they are always so far dramatic that the thoughts and sentiments are such as he conceived possible for the supposed See also:speaker.

Thucydides abstains, as a rule, from moral comment; but he tells his story as no one could have told it who did not profoundly feel its tragic force; and his general claim to the merit of impartiality is not invalidated by the possible exceptions—difficult to estimate—in the cases of See also:

Cleon and Hyperbolus. Strong as is the contrast between Herodotus and Thucydides, their works have yet a character which distinguish both alike from the historical work of See also:Xenophon in the See also:Anabasis and the Hellenica. Herodotus gives us a vivid drama Xenophon. with the unity of an epic. Thucydides takes a great See also:chapter of contemporary history and traces the causes which are at work throughout it, so as to give the whole a scientific unity. Xenophon has not the grasp either of the dramatist or of the philosopher. His work does not possess the higher unity either of art or of See also:science. The true distinction of Xenophon consists in his thorough See also:combination of the practical with the literary character. He was an accomplished soldier, who had done and seen much. He was also a good writer, who could make a story both clear and lively. But the several parts of the story are not grouped around any central idea, such as a divine Nemesis is for Herodotus, or such as Thucydides finds in the nature of political man. The seven books of the Hellenica form a supplement to the history of Thucydides, beginning in 411 and going down to 362 B.C.

The chief blot on the Hellenica is the author's partiality to See also:

Sparta, and in particular to Agesilaus. Some of the greatest achievements of See also:Epaminondas and See also:Pelopidas are passed over in silence. On the whole, Xenophon is perhaps seen at his best in his narrative of the See also:Retreat of the Ten Thousand —a subject which exactly suits him. The Cyropaedeia is a See also:romance of little historical See also:worth, but with many good passages. The Recollections of See also:Socrates, on the other hand, derive their principal value from being uniformly matter-of-fact. In his minor pieces on various subjects Xenophon appears as the earliest essayist. It may be noted that one of the essays erroneously ascribed to him—that On the Athenian Polity—is probably the oldest specimen in existence of literary Attic prose. His contemporaries See also:Ctesias of See also:Cnidus and See also:Philistus of Syracuse wrote histories of See also:Persia and Sicily. In the second See also:half of the 4th century a number of histories were compiled by literary men of little practical knowledge, who had been trained in the Literary and, when he wrote, the Attic drama had already prose. Early prose writers. rhetorical See also:schools. Such were See also:Ephorus of Cyme and See also:Theopompus of Chios, both pupils of Isocrates; and the writers of Atthides (See also:chronicles of Attic history), the chief of whom were See also:Androtion and See also:Philochorus.

See also:

Timaeus of Tauromenium was the author of a great work on Sicily, and introduced the system of reckoning by Olympiads. The steps by which an Attic prose style was developed, and the principal forms which it assumed, can be traced most clearly oratory. in the Attic orators. Every Athenian citizen who aspired to take part in the affairs of the city, or even to be qualified for self-See also:defence before a law-court, required to have some degree of skill in public speaking; and an Athenian See also:audience looked upon public debate, whether political or forensic, as a competitive trial of proficiency in a See also:fine art. Hence the speaker, no less than the writer, was necessarily a student of finished expression; and oratory had a more direct influence on the general structure of literary prose than has ever perhaps been the case elsewhere. A systematic rhetoric took its rise in Sicily, where Corax of Syracuse (466 B.C.) devised his Art of Words to assist those who were See also:pleading before the law-courts; and it was brought to Athens by his See also:disciple Tisias. The teaching of the See also:Sophists, again, directed attention, though in a superficial and imperfect way, to the elements of See also:grammar and See also:logic; and See also:Gorgias of See also:Leontini—whose declamation, however turgid, must have been striking—gave an impulse at Athens to the See also:taste for elaborate rhetorical brilliancy. Antiphon represents the earliest, and what has been called the See also:grand, style of Attic prose; its chief characteristics are The Attic a See also:grave, dignified movement, a frequent emphasis orators. on verbal contrasts, and a certain austere See also:elevation. The interest of See also:Andocides is mainly historical; but he has graphic power. See also:Lysias, the representative of the " See also:plain style," breaks through the rigid mannerism of the elder school, and uses the language of daily life with an ease and grace which, though the result of study, do not betray their art. He is, in his own way, the See also:canon of an Attic style; and his speeches, written for others, exhibit also a high degree of dramatic skill. Isocrates, whose manner may be regarded as intermediate between that of Antiphon and that of Lysias, wrote for readers rather than for hearers. The type of literary prose which he founded is distinguished by ample periods, by studied smoothness and by the temperate use of rhetorical See also:ornament.

From the middle of the 4th century B.C. the Isocratic style of prose became general in Greek literature. From the school of See also:

Rhodes, in which it became more florid, it passed to See also:Cicero, and through him it has helped to shape the literary prose of the modern world. The speeches of See also:Isaeus in will-cases are interesting,—apart from their bearing on Attic life,—because in them we see, as See also:Dionysius says, " the seeds and the beginnings " of that technical mastery in rhetorical See also:argument which See also:Demosthenes carries to perfection. Isaeus has also, in a degree, some of the qualities of Lysias. Demosthenes excels all other masters of Greek prose not only in power but in variety; his political speeches, his orations in public or private causes, show his consummate and versatile command over all the resources of the language. In him the development of Attic prose is completed, and the best elements in each of its earlier phases are See also:united. The modern world can more easily appreciate Demos- thenes as a great natural orator than as an elaborate artist. But, in order to apprehend his place in the history of Attic prose, we must remember that the ancients felt him to be both; and that he was even reproached by detractors with excessive study of effect. See also:Aeschines is the most theatrical of the Greek orators; he is vehement, and often brilliant, but seldom persuasive. See also:Hypereides was, after Demosthenes, probably the most effective; Ile had much of the grace of Lysias, but also a wit, a See also:fire and a pathos which were his own. Portions of six of his speeches, found in See also:Egypt between 1847 and 189o, are extant. The one oration of Lycurgus which remains to us is earnest and stately, reminding us both of Antiphon and of Isocrates.

See also:

Dinarchus was merely a bad imitator of Demosthenes. There seems more See also:reason to regret that See also:Demades is not represented by larger XlI. 17fragments. The decline of Attic oratory may be dated from Demetrius of Phalerum (318 B.C.), the pupil of Aristotle, and the first to introduce the See also:custom of making speeches on imaginary subjects as practised in the rhetorical schools. Cicero names him as the first who impaired the vigour of the earlier eloquence, " preferring his own sweetness to the See also:weight and dignity of his predecessors." He forms a connecting See also:link between Athens and See also:Alexandria, where he found See also:refuge after his downfall and promoted the foundation of the famous library. In later times oratory chiefly flourished in the coast and island settlements of Asia Minor, especially Rhodes. Here a new, florid style of oration arose, called the " Asiatic," which owed its origin to Hegesias of See also:Magnesia (c. 250 B.C.). The place of Plato in the history of Greek literature is as unique as his place in the history of Greek thought. The literary genius shown in the dialogues is many-sided: it includes dramatic power, remarkable skill in See also:parody, phicat a subtle See also:faculty of satire, and, generally, a command prose—over the finer tones of language. In passages of A ri Arat°stotle and continuous exposition, where the argument rises into the higher regions of discussion, Plato's prose takes a more decidedly poetical colouring—never florid or sentimental, however, but lofty and austere. In Plato's later works—such, for instance, as the See also:Laws, Timaeus, Critics—we can perceive that his style did not remain unaffected by the smooth literary prose which contemporary writers had developed.

Aristotle's influence on the form of Attic prose literature would probably have been considerable if his Rhetoric had been published while Attic oratory had still a vigorous life before it. But in this, as in other departments of mental effort, it was Aristotle's See also:

lot to set in order what the Greek See also:intellect had done in that creative period which had now come to an end. His own chief contribution to the original achievements of the race was the most fitting one that could have been made by him in whose lifetime they were closed. He bequeathed an instrument by which analysis could be carried further, he founded a science of reasoning, and left those who followed him to apply it in all those provinces of knowledge which he had mapped out.' See also:Theophrastus, his pupil and his successor in the See also:Lyceum, opens the new age of See also:research and scientific See also:classification with his extant works on See also:botany, but is better known to modern readers by his lively Characters, the prototypes of such sketches in English literature as those of See also:Hall, See also:Overbury and See also:Earle. (C) The Literature of the Decadence.—The period of decadence in Greek literature begins with the extinction of See also:free political life in the Greek cities. So long as the Greek common- character wealths were independent and vigorous, Greek life of the rested on the identity of the man with the citizen. creative The city state was the highest unit of social organiza- age. tion; the whole training and character of the man were viewed relatively to his membership of the city. The See also:market-place, the assembly, the theatre were places of frequent See also:meeting, where the sense of citizenship was quickened, where common See also:standards of opinion or feeling were formed. Poetry, music, See also:sculpture, literature, art, in all their forms, were matters of public interest. Every citizen had some degree of acquaintance with them, and was in some measure capable of judging them. The poet and the musician, the historian and the sculptor, did not live a life of studious seclusion or See also:engrossing professional work. They were, as a rule, in full sympathy with the practical interests of their time.

Their art, whatever its form might be, was the concentrated and ennobled expression of their political existence. Aeschylus breathed into tragedy the inspiration of one who had himself fought the great fight of national liberation. Sophocles was the colleague of Pericles in a high military command. Thucydides describes the operations of the Peloponnesian War with the practical knowledge of one who had been in See also:

charge of a See also:fleet. See also:Ictinus and See also:Pheidias gave shape in See also:stone, not to mere visions of the studio, but to the more glorious, because more His Constitution of Athens (q.v.), of which a papyrus MS. was found in Egypt and published in 1891, forms,part of a larger work on the constitution of 158 Greek and foreign cities. [I Demosthenes. real and vivid, perceptions which had been quickened in them by a living communion with the Athenian spirit, by a daily contemplation of Athenian greatness, in the theatre where tragic poets idealized the legends of the past, in the See also:ecclesia where every citizen had his See also:vote on the policy of the state, or in that free and gracious society, full of beauty, yet exempt from vexatious constraint, which belonged to the age of Pericles. The tribunal which judged these works of literature or art was such as was best fitted to preserve the favourable conditions under which they arose. Criticism was not in the hands of a literary clique or of a social See also:caste. The influence of See also:jealousy or malevolence, and the more fatal influence of affectation, had little power to affect the See also:verdict. The verdict was pronounced by the whole See also:body of the citizens. The success or failure of a tragedy was decided, not by the minor circumstance that it gained the first or second prize, but by the collective opinion of the citizens assembled in the theatre of Dionysus.

A work of See also:

architecture or sculpture was approved or condemned, not by the sentence of a few whom the multitude blindly followed, but by the general judgment of some twenty thousand persons, each of whom was in some degree qualified by See also:education and by See also:habit to form an independent estimate. The artist worked for all his See also:fellow-citizens, and knew that he would be judged by all. The soul of his work was the fresh and living inspiration of nature; it was the ennobled expression of his own life; and the public opinion before which it came was free, intelligent and sincere. See also:Philip of Macedon did not take away the municipal See also:independence of the Greek cities, but he dealt a death-See also:blow to the old political life. The Athenian poet, historian, artist The See also:trap- might still do good work, but he could never again have sHloa to See also:Hellenism. that which used to be the very mainspring of all such activity—the daily experience and consciousness of participation in the affairs of an independent state. He could no longer breathe the invigorating See also:air of constitutional freedom, or of the social intercourse to which that freedom See also:lent dignity as well as grace. Then came Alexander's conquests; Greek See also:civilization was diffused over Asia and the See also:East by means of Greek colonies in which Asiatic and Greek elements were mingled. The life of such settlements, under the monarchies into which Alexander's See also:empire See also:broke up, could not be animated by the spirit of the Greek commonwealths in the old days of political freedom. But the externals of Greek life were there—the temples, the statues, the theatres, the porticos. Ceremonies and festivals were conducted in the Greek manner. In private life Greek usages prevailed. Greek was the language most used; Greek books were in demand.

The mixture of races would always in some measure distinguish even the outward life of such a community from that of a pure Greek state; and the facility with which Greek civilization was adopted would vary in different places. See also:

Syria, for example, was rapidly and completely Hellenized. See also:Judaea resisted the process to the last. In Egypt a Greek See also:aristocracy of office, See also:birth and intellect existed side by side with a distinct native life. But, viewed in its broadest aspect, this new civilization may be called Hellenism. Hellenism (q.v.) means the See also:adoption of Hellenic ways; and it is properly applied to a civilization, generally Hellenic in external things, pervading people not necessarily or exclusively Hellenic by race. What the Hellenic literature was to Hellas, that the Hellenistic literature was to Hellenism. The literature of Hellenism has the Hellenic form without the Hellenic soul. The literature of Hellas was creative; the literature of Hellenism is derivative. Alexandria was the centre of Greek intellectual activity from Alexander to See also:Augustus. Its " Museum,"• or See also:college, and its library, both founded by the first See also:Ptolemy (See also:Soter), The Alex- gave it such attractions for learned men as no other andrian period. city could rival. The labours of research or arrange- ment are those which' characterize the Alexandrian period.

Even in its poetry spontaneous See also:

motive was replaced by erudite skill, as in the hymns, epigrams and elegies of Calli-Poetry. machus, in the enigmatic verses of See also:Lycophron, in the highly finished epic of See also:Apollonius Rhodius, dnd in the versified lore, astronomical or medical, of See also:Aratus and See also:Nicander. The mimes of See also:Herodas (or Herondas) of Cos (c. 200 B.c.), written in the Ionic dialect and choliambic verse, represent scenes from everyday life. The papyrus (published in 1891) contains seven complete poems and fragments of an eighth. They are remarkably witty and full of shrewd observations, but at times coarse. The See also:pastoral poetry of the age—Dorian by origin—was the most pleasing; for this, if it is to please at all, must have its spring in the contemplation of nature. Theocritus is not exempt from the artificialism of the Hellenizing literature; but his true sense of natural beauty entitles him to a place in the first See also:rank of pastoral poets. See also:Bion of Ionia and See also:Moschus of Syracuse also See also:charm by the music and often by the pathos of their bucolic verse. Excavations on the site of the temple of Asclepius at See also:Epidaurus have brought to light two hexameter poems and a paean (in Ionic metre) on Apollo and Asclepius by a local poet named See also:Isyllus, who flourished about 280. Tragedy was represented by the poets known as the Alexandrian See also:Pleiad. But it is not for its poetry of any kind that this period of Greek literature is memorable. Its true work was in erudition and science.

Aristarchus (156 B.C.), the greatest in a Erudition long line of Alexandrian critics, set the example of a s nce. more thorough method in revising and interpreting the ancient texts, and may in this sense be said to have become the founder of scientific scholarship. The critical studies of Alexandria, carried on by the followers of Aristarchus, gradually formed the basis for a science of grammar. The earliest Greek grammar is that of Dionysius Thrax (born c. 166), a pupil of Aristarchus. See also:

Translation was another province of work which employed the learned of Alexandria—where the See also:Septuagint version of the Old Testament was begun, probably about 300–250 B.C. See also:Chronology was treated scientifically by Eratosthenes, and was combined with history by See also:Manetho in his chronicles of Egypt, and by See also:Berossus in his chronicles of See also:Chaldaea. See also:Euclid was at Alexandria in the reign of Ptolemy Soter. Herophilus and Erasistratus were distinguished physicians and anatomists, and the authors of several medical works. The general results of the Alexandrian period might perhaps be stated See also:summary. thus. Alexandria produced a few eminent men of science, some learned poets (in a few cases, of great literary merit) and many able scholars. The preservation of the best Greek literature was due chiefly to the unremitting care of the Alexandrian critics, whose appreciation of it partly compensated for the decay of the old Greek perceptions in literature and art, and who did their utmost to hand it down in a form as free as possible from the errors of copyists. On the whole, the patronage of letters by the See also:Ptolemies had probably as large a measure of success as was possible under the existing conditions; and it was afforded at a time when there was special danger that a true literary tradition might See also:die out of the world.

The Graeco-Roman period in the literature of Hellenism may be dated from the Roman subjugation of Greece. " Greece made a See also:

captive of the rough conqueror," but it did The not follow from this intellectual conquest that Athens Graeco- became once more the intellectual centre of the world. Roman Under the empire, indeed, the university of Athens period long enjoyed a pre-eminent reputation. But See also:Rome gradually became the point to which the greatest workers in every kind were See also:drawn. Greek literature had already made a home there before the See also:close of the 2nd century B.C. See also:Sulla brought a Greek library from Athens to Rome. Such men as Cicero and See also:Atticus were indefatigable collectors and readers of Greek books. The power of speaking and writing the Greek language became an indispensable accomplishment for highly educated See also:Romans. The library planned by See also:Julius See also:Caesar and founded by Augustus had two principal departments, one for Latin, the other for Greek works. Tiberius, See also:Vespasian, See also:Domitian and See also:Trajan contributed to enlarge the collection. Rome became more and more the rival of Alexandria, not only as possessing great See also:libraries, but also as a seat of learning at which Greek men of letters found appreciation and encouragement. Greek poetry, especially in its higher forms, rhetoric and literary criticism, history and philosophy, were all cultivated by Greek writers at Rome.

The first part of the Graeco-Roman period may be defined as extending from 146 B.C. to the close of the Roman See also:

republic. At its commencement stands the name of one who First part had more real affinity than any of his contemporaries 146-30 B.C. with the great writers of old Athens, and who, at the same time, saw most clearly how the empire of the world was passing to Rome. The subject of See also:Polybius (c. 205–120) was the history of Roman conquest from 264 to 146 B.C. His style, plain and straightforward, is free from the florid rhetoric of the time. But the distinction of Polybius is that he is the last Greek writer who in some measure retains the spirit of the old citizen-life. He See also:chose his subject, not because it gave scope to learning or literary skill, but with a motive akin to that which prompted the history of Thucydides—namely, because, as a Greek citizen, he felt intensely the political importance of those wars which had given Rome the mastery of the world. The chief historical work which the following century produced—the Universal History of Diodorus Siculus (fl. c. 50 B.c.)—resembled that of Polybius in recognizing Rome as the political centre of the earth, as the point on which all earlier series of events converged. In all else Diodorus represents the new age in which the Greek historian had no longer the practical knowledge and insight of a traveller, a soldier or a statesman, but only the See also:diligence, and usually the dulness, of a laborious compiler. The Greek literature of the Roman empire, from Augustus to Justinian, was enormously prolific. The See also:area over which Second the Greek language was diffused—either as a See also:medium part: of intercourse or as an established branch of the higher 3o B.c.- education—was co-extensive with the empire itself.

A.D. 529. An immense See also:

store of materials had now been accumulated, on which critics, commentators, compilers, imitators, were employed with incessant See also:industry. In very many of its forms, the work of composition or See also:adaptation had been reduced to a mechanical knack. If there is any one characteristic which broadly distinguishes the Greek literature of these five centuries, it is the See also:absence of originality either in form or in matter. See also:Lucian is, in his way, a rare exception; and his great popularity—he is the only Greek writer of this period, except Plutarch, who has been widely popular—illustrates the flatness of the arid level above which he stands out. The sustained abundance of literary See also:production under the empire was partly due to the fact that there was no open political career. Never, probably, was literature so important as a resource for educated men; and the habit of reciting before friendly or obsequious audiences swelled the number of writers whose taste had been cultivated to a point just short of perceiving that they ought not to write. In the manifold prose work of this period, four principal departments may be distinguished. (r) History, with See also:Biography, Depart- and Geography. History is represented by Dionysius ments of of Halicarnassus—also memorable for his criticisms on prose the orators and his effort to revive a true standard literature. of Attic prose—by See also:Cassius Dio, See also:Josephus, See also:Arrian, See also:Appian, Herodian, See also:Eusebius and See also:Zosimus. In biography, the foremost names are Plutarch, See also:Diogenes Laertius and See also:Philostratus; in geography, Hipparchus of See also:Nicaea, See also:Strabo, Ptolemy and See also:Pausanias.

(2) Erudition and Science. The learned labours of the Alexandrian schools were continued in all their various See also:

fields. Under this See also:head may be mentioned such works as the lexicons of Julius See also:Pollux, See also:Harpocration and See also:Hesychius, See also:Hephaestion's See also:treatise on metre, and Herodian's system of accentuation; the commentaries of See also:Galen on Plato and on See also:Hippocrates; the learned miscellanies of See also:Athenaeus, See also:Aelian and See also:Stobaeus; and the Stratagems of See also:Polyaenus. (3) Rhetoric and Belles-Lettees. The most popular writers on the theory of rhetoric were See also:Hermagoras, See also:Hermogenes, See also:Aphthonius and Cassius See also:Longinus—the last the reputed author of the See also:essay On Sublimity. Among the most renowned teachers of rhetoric—now distinctively, called " Sophists," or rhetoricians—were Dio See also:Chrysostom, Aelius See also:Aristides, See also:Themistius, See also:Himerius, See also:Libanius and Herodes Atticus. Akin to the rhetorical exercises were various forms of ornamental or imaginative prose—dialogues, letters, essays or novels. Lucian, in his dialogues, exhibits more of the classical style and of the classical spirit than any writer of the later age; he has also a remarkable affinity with the tone of modern satire, as in See also:Swift or See also:Voltaire. His Attic prose, though necessarily artificial, was at least the best that had been written for four centuries. The emperor Julian was the author both of orations and of satirical pieces. The chief of the Greek novelists (the forerunner of whom was Aristides of Miletus, c. Too B.C., in his Milesian Tales) are Xenophon of Ephesus and See also:Longus, representing a purely Greek type of romance, and See also:Heliodorus—with his imitators See also:Achilles Tatius and See also:Chariton—representing a school influenced by See also:Oriental fiction.

There were also many Christian romances in Greek, usually of a religious tendency. See also:

Alciphron's fictitious Letters—founded largely on the New Comedy of Athens—represent the same kind of industry which produced the letters of See also:Phalaris, See also:Aristaenetus and similar collections. (4) Philosophy is represented chiefly by See also:Epictetus and See also:Marcus Aurelius, in both of whom the Stoic See also:element is the prevailing one; by the Neoplatonists, such as See also:Plotinus, See also:Porphyry, lamblichus; and by Proclus, of that eclectic school which arose at Athens in the 5th century A.D. The Greek poetry of this period presents no work of high merit. See also:Babrius versified the Aesopic Fables; See also:Oppian (or two poets of this name) wrote didactic poems on fishing verse. and See also:hunting; See also:Nonnus and' See also:Quintus Smyrnaeus made elaborate essays in epic verse; and the Orphic lore inspired some poems and hymns of a mystic character. The so-called Sibylline Oracles, in hexameter verse, range in date from about 170 B.C. to A.D. 700, and are partly the expression of the Jewish longings for the restoration of See also:Israel, partly predictions of the triumph of See also:Christianity. By far the most pleasing com- The An- positions in verse which have come to us from this age thology. are some of the short poems in the Greek See also:Anthology, which includes some pieces as early as the beginning of the 5th century B.C. and some as late as the 6th century of the Christian era. The 4th century may be said to mark the beginning of the last stage in the decay of literary Hellenism. From that point the decline was rapid and nearly continuous. The attitude of the See also:church towards it was no longer that which had been held by See also:Clement of Alexandria, by See also:Justin See also:Martyr or by See also:Origen. There was now a Christian Greek literature, and a Christian Greek eloquence of extraordinary power.

The laity became more and more estranged from the Greek literature—however intrinsically pure and See also:

noble--of the See also:pagan past. At the same time the Greek language—which had maintained its purity in See also:Italian seats—was becoming corrupted in the new Greek Rome of the East. In A.D. 529 Justinian put forth an See also:edict by which the schools of See also:heathen philosophy were formally closed. The See also:act had at least a symbolical meaning. It is necessary to guard against the supposition that such assumed landmarks in political or literary history always mark a definite transition from one order of things to another. But it is practically convenient, or necessary, to use such landmarks. lyric, drama down to Euripides, and the beginnings of prose; R. See also:Nicolai, Griechische Literaturgeschichte (2nd ed., 1873—1878), useful for bibliography, but in other respects unsatisfactory; J. P. See also:Mahaffy, His'. of Classical Greek Literature (4th ed., 1903) ; A. and M. Croiset, Hist. de la litterature grecque (1887-1899, 2nd ed.

1896); W. See also:

Christ, Geschichte der griechischen Literatur bis auf die Zeit Justinians (4th ed., 1905; 5th ed., pt. i., by O. Stahlin and W. Schmid, 1908), by far the most serviceable handbook for the student. F. Susemihl's Geschichte der griechischen Literatur in der Alexandrinerzeit (1891—1892) is especially valuable for its notes. Of smaller manuals the following will be found most useful: G. G. See also:Murray, History of Ancient Greek Literature (1897) ; F. B. See also:Jevons, History of Greek Literature (3rd ed., 1900) down to the time of Demosthenes; A. and M. Croiset, See also:Manuel d'hist. de la litterature grecque (1900; Eng. trans., by G.

F. Heffelbower, N.Y., 1904); also the general sketches by U. von Wilamowitz-Mollendorff in Die Kultur der Gegenwart, i. 8 (1905), by A. Gercke in the Sammlung See also:

Goschen (See also:Leipzig, 2nd ed., 1905), and by R. C. See also:Jebb in See also:Companion to Greek Studies (See also:Cambridge, 1905). Other works generally connected with the subject are: E. See also:Hubner, Bibliographie der klassischen Altertumswissenschaft (2nd ed., 1889), pp. 161-171; W. Engelmann, Bibliotheca scriptorum classicorum (8th ed., by E. Preuss, 188o) ; J. B.

See also:

Mayor, See also:Guide to the Choice of Classical Books (1896), p. 86; W. Kroll, Die Altertumswissenschaft See also:im letzten Vierteljahrhundert 1875—1900 (1905), p. 465 See also:foil.; J. E. See also:Sandys, History of Classical Scholarship (1906—1908); " Bibliotheca philologica classica," in C. See also:Bursian's Jahresbericht fiber die Fortschritte der klassischen Altertumswissenschaft; articles in Pauly-Wissowa's Realencyclopadie der klassischen Altertumswissenschaft (1894—). (R. C. J.; X.) II. BYZANTINE LITERATURE By "Byzantine literature" is generally meant the literature, written in Greek, of the so-called Byzantine period. There is no See also:justification whatever for the inclusion of Latin works Def/a/- of the time of the East Roman empire.

The close of t/oa. the Byzantine period is clearly marked by the year 1453, at which date, with the fall of the Eastern empire, the peculiar culture and literary life of the Byzantines came to an end. It is only as regards the beginning of the Byzantine period that any doubts exist. There are no sufficient grounds for dating it from Justinian, as was formerly often done. In See also:

surveying the whole development of the political, ecclesiastical and literary life and of the general culture of the Roman empire, and particularly of its eastern portion, we arrive, on the contrary, at the conclusion that the actual date of the beginning of this new era—i.e. the Christian-Byzantine, in contradistinction to the Pagan-Greek and Pagan-Roman—falls within the reign of See also:Constantine the Great. By the foundation of the new See also:capital city of See also:Constantinople (which lay amid Greek surroundings) and by the See also:establishment of the Christian faith as the state religion, Constantine finally broke with the Roman-Pagan tradition, and laid the foundation of the Christian-Byzantine period of development. Moreover, in the See also:department of language, so closely allied with that of literature, the 4th century marks a new epoch. About this time occurred the final disappearance of a characteristic of the ancient Greek language, important alike in poetry and in rhythmic prose, the difference of " quantity." Its place was henceforth taken by the See also:accent, which became a determining principle in poetry, as well as for the rhythmic conclusion of the prose sentence. Thus the transition from the old musical language to a modern conversational See also:idiom was complete. The reign of Constantine the Great undoubtedly marks the beginning of a new period in the most important See also:spheres of national life, but it is equally certain that in most of Trans'. them ancient tradition long continued to exercise an sonar period. influence. Sudden breaches of continuity are less common in the general culture and literary life of the world than in its political or ecclesiastical development. This is true of the transition from pagan antiquity to the Christian middle ages.

Many centuries passed before the final victory of the new religious ideas and the new spirit in public and private intellectual and moral life. The last noteworthy remnants of paganism disappeared as late as the 6th and 7th centuries. The last great educational establishment which rested upon pagan See also:

foundations—the university of Athens—was not abolished till A.D. 529. The Hellenizing of the seat of empire and of the state, which was essential to the independent development of Byzantineliterature, proceeds yet more slowly. The first purely Greek emperor was Tiberius II. (578–582); but the complete Hellenizing of the character of the state had not been accomplished until the 7th century. We shall, therefore, regard the period from the 4th to the 7th century as that of the transition between ancient times and the middle ages. This period coincides with the rise of a new power in the world's history—See also:Islam. But though, in this transitional period, the old and the new elements are both to a large extent present and are often inextricably interwoven, yet it is certain that the new elements are, both as regards their essential force and their influence upon the succeeding period, of infinitely greater moment than the decrepit and mostly artificial survivals of the See also:antique. In order to estimate rightly the character of Byzantine literature and its distinctive peculiarities, in contradistinction to ancient Greek, it is imperative to examine the great nixed difference between the civilizations that produced character them. The Byzantine did not possess the homo- ofBygeneous, organically constructed system of the ancient zant/aetorecu/ civilization, but was the outcome of an amalgamation of which Hellenism formed the basis.

For, although the Latin character of the empire was at first completely retained, even after its final See also:

division in 395, yet the dominant position of Greek in the Eastern empire gradually led to the Hellenizing of the state. The last great act of the Latin tradition was the codification, in the Latin language, of the law by Justinian (527–565). But it is significant that the Novels of Justinian were composed partly in Greek, as were all the laws of the succeeding period. Of the emperors in the centuries following Justinian, many of course were foreigners, Isaurians, Armenians and others; but in language and education they were all Greeks. In the last five centuries of the empire, under the Comneni and the Palaeologi, court and state are purely Greek. In spite of the dominant position of Greek in the Eastern empire, a linguistic and national uniformity such as formed the foundation of the old Latin Imperium Romanum never existed there. In the West, with the expansion of Rome's political supremacy, the Latin language and Latin culture were every-where introduced—first into the non-Latin provinces of Italy, later into See also:Spain, See also:Gaul and North See also:Africa, and at last even into certain parts of the Eastern empire. This Latinizing was so thorough that it weathered all storms, and, in the countries affected by it, was the See also:parent of new and vigorous nationalities, the See also:French, the Spaniards, the Portuguese and the Rumanians. Only in Africa did " Latinism " fail to take See also:root permanently. From the 6th century that province relapsed into the hands of the native barbarians and of the immigrant See also:Arabs, and both the Latin and the Greek influences (which had grown in strength during the period of the Eastern empire) were, together with Christianity, swept away without leaving a trace behind. It might have been expected that the Hellenizing of the political system of the Eastern empire would have likewise entailed the Hellenizing of the non-Greek portions of the empire. Such, however, was not the case; for all the conditions precedent to such a development were wanting.

The non-Greek portions of the Eastern empire were not, from the outset, gradually incorporated into the state from a Greek centre, as were the provinces in the West from a Latin centre. They had been acquired in the old period of the homogeneous Latin Imperium. In the centuries immediately following the division of the empire, the idea of Hellenizing the Eastern provinces could not take root, owing to the fact that Latin was retained, at least in principle, as the state language. During the later centuries, in the non-Greek parts, centrifugal tendencies and the destructive inroads of barbarians began on all sides; and the government was too much occupied with the all but impossible task of preserving the political unity of the empire to entertain seriously the wider aim of an assimilation of language and culture. More-over, the Greeks did not possess that enormous political See also:

energy and force which enabled the Romans to assimilate foreign races; and, finally, they were confronted by sturdy Oriental, mostly Semitic, peoples, who were by no means so easy to subjugate as were the racially related inhabitants of Gaul and Spain. Their See also:impotence against the peoples of the East will be still less hardly judged if we remember the fact already mentioned, that even the Romans were within a short period driven back and overwhelmed by the North See also:African Semites who for centuries had been subjected to an apparently thorough process of Latinization. The influence of Greek culture then, was very slight; how little indeed it penetrated into the oriental mind is shown by the fact that, after the violent Arab invasion in the See also:south-east corner of the Mediterranean, the See also:Copts and Syrians were able to retain their language and their national characteristics, while Greek culture almost completely disappeared. The one great instance of assimilation of foreign nationalities by the Greeks is the Hellenizing of the Slays, who from the 6th century had migrated into central Greece and the Peloponnese. All other non-Greek tribes of any importance which came, whether for longer or for shorter periods, within the sphere of the Eastern empire and its civilization—such as the Copts, Syrians, Armenians, Georgians, Rumanians, Serbs, Bulgarians, Albanians —one and all retained their See also:nationality and language. The complete Latinizing of the West has, accordingly, no counterpart in a similar Hellenizing of the East. This is clearly shown during the Byzantine period in the progress of Christianity. Every-where in the West, even among the non-Romanized Anglo-See also:Saxons, Irish and Germans, Latin maintained its position in the church services and in the other branches of the ecclesiastical system; down to the See also:Reformation the church remained a complete organic unity.

In the East, at the earliest period of its See also:

conversion to Christianity, several foreign See also:tongues competed with Greek, i.e. Syrian, Coptic, Armenian, Georgian, See also:Gothic, Old-Bulgarian and others. The sacred books were translated into these See also:languages and the church services were held in them and not in Greek. One noticeable effect of this linguistic division in the church was the formation of various sects and national churches (cf. the Coptic See also:Nestorians, the Syrian See also:Monophysites, the Armenian and, in more See also:recent times, the See also:Slavonic national churches). The Church of the West was characterized by uniformity in language and in constitution. In the Eastern Church parallel to the multiplicity of languages developed also a corresponding variety of doctrine and constitution. Though the character of Byzantine culture is mainly Greek, and Byzantine literature is attached by countless threads to ancient Greek literature, yet the Roman element forms a very essential part of it. The whole political character of the Byzantine empire is, despite its Greek form and colouring, genuinely Roman. Legislation and See also:administration, the military and naval traditions, are old Roman work, and as such, apart from immaterial alterations, they continued to exist and operate, even when the state in head and limbs had become Greek. It is See also:strange, indeed, how strong was the political conception of the Roman state (Staalsgedanke), and with what tenacity it held its own, even under the most adverse conditions, down to the latter days of the empire. The Greeks even adopted the name " Romans," which gradually became so closely identified with them as to supersede the name " Hellenes "; and thus a political was gradually converted into an ethnographical and linguistic designation. Rhomaioi was the most common popular term for Greeks during the See also:Turkish period, and remains so still.

The old glorious name " Hellene " was used under the empire and even during the middle ages in a contemptuous sense—" Heathen "—and has only in quite modern times, on the formation of the See also:

kingdom of " Hellas," been artificially revived. The vast organization of the Roman political system could not but exercise in various ways a profound influence upon Byzantine civilization; and it often seemed as if Roman political principles had.educated and nerved the unpolitical Greek people to great political enterprise. The Roman influence has left distinct traces in the Greek language, Greek of the Byzantine and modern period is See also:rich in Latin terms for conceptions connected with the departments of justice, administration and the imperial court. In literature such " barbarisms " were avoided as far as possible, and were replaced by Greek periphrases. But by far the most momentous and See also:radical change wrought on the old Hellenism was effected by Christianity; and yet the transition was, in fact, by no means so abrupt as one might be led to believe by comparing the Pagan-Hellenic culture of Plato's day with the Christian-Byzantine of the time of Justinian. For the path had been most effectually prepared for the new religion by the crumbling away of the ancient belief in the gods, by the humane doctrine of the See also:Stoics, and, finally, by the mystic intellectual tendencies of See also:Neoplatonism. Moreover, in many respects Christianity met paganism halfway by adapting itself to popular usages and ideas and by adopting important parts of the pagan literature. The whole educational system especially, even in Christian times, was in a very remarkable manner based almost entirely on the methods and material inherited from paganism. Next to the influences of Rome and of Christianity, that of the East was of importance in developing the Byzantine civilization, and in lending Byzantine literature its distinctive character. The Much that was oriental in the Eastern empire dates Orient. back to ancient times, notably to the period of Alex- ander the Great and his successors. Since the Greeks had ,at that period Hellenized the East to the widest extent, and had already founded everywhere flourishing cities, they them-selves fell under the manifold influences of the See also:soil they occupied. In Egypt, See also:Palestine and Syria, in Asia Minor as far inland as See also:Mesopotamia, Greek and oriental characteristics were often blended.

In respect of the See also:

wealth and the long duration of its Greek intellectual life, Egypt stands supreme. It covers a period of nearly a thousand years from the foundation of Alexandria down to the conquest of Egypt by the Arabs (A.D. 643). The real significance of Egyptian Hellenism during this long period can be properly estimated only if a practical See also:attempt be made to eliminate from the history of Greek literature and science in pagan and in Christian times all that owed its origin to the See also:land of the See also:Nile. The soil of Egypt proved itself especially productive of Greek literature under the See also:Cross (Origen, See also:Athanasius, See also:Arius, See also:Synesius), in the same way as the soil of North Africa was productive of Latin literature (See also:Tertullian, Cyprian, Lactantius, See also:Augustine). Monastic life, which is one of the chief characteristic elements of Christian-Byzantine civilization, had its birth in Egypt. Syria and Palestine came under the influence of Greek civilization at a later date than Egypt. In these, Greek literature and culture attained their highest development between the 3rd and the 8th centuries of the Christian era. See also:Antioch See also:rose to great influence, owing at first to its pagan school of rhetoric and later to its Christian school of exegesis. See also:Gaza was renowned for its school of rhetoric; Berytus for its See also:academy of law. It is no mere accident that sacred poetry, aesthetically the most valuable class of Byzantine literature, was born in Syria and Palestine. In Asia Minor, the cities of See also:Tarsus, Caesarea, Nicaea, Smyrna, Ephesus, See also:Nicopolis, &c., were all influential centres of Greek culture and literature.

For instance, the three great fathers of See also:

Cappadocia, See also:Basil, See also:Gregory of Nyssa, and Gregory of Nazianzus all belonged to Asia Minor. If all the greater Greek authors of the first eight centuries of the Christian era, i.e. the period of the complete development of Byzantine culture, be classified according to the countries of their birth, the significant fact becomes evident that nine-tenths come from the African and Asiatic districts, which were for the most part opened up only after Alexander the Great, and only one-tenth from European Greece. In other words, the old original European Greece was, under the emperors, completely outstripped in intellectual productive force by the newly founded African and Asiatic Greece. This huge See also:tide of conquest which surged from Greece over African and Syrian territories occupied largely by foreign races and ancient civilizations, could not fail to be fraught with serious See also:con-sequences for the Greeks themselves. The experience of the Roman influence. Christianity. Romans in their conquest of Greece (Graecia capta ferum victorem time fully revealed. The gulf between the two forms of language could no longer be bridged; and this fact found its expression in literature also. While the vulgarizing authors of the 6th–Toth centuries, like the Latin-writing See also:Franks (such as Gregory of See also:Tours), still attempted a See also:compromise between the language of the schools and that of conversation, we meet after the See also:lath century with authors who freely and naturally employed the See also:vernacular in their literary works. They accordingly form the Greek counterpart of the oldest writers in Italian, French and other Romance languages. That they could not succeed like their Roman colleagues, and always remained the pariahs of Greek literature, is due to the all-powerful philological-antiquarian tendency which existed under the Comneni and the Palaeologi. Yet once more did the vernacular attempt to assert its literary rights, i.e. in See also:Crete and some other islands in the 16th and 17th centuries.

But this attempt also was foiled by the classical reaction of the 19th century. Hence it comes about that Greek literature even in the aoth century employs grammatical forms which were obsolete long before the loth century. Thus the Greeks, as regards their literary language, came into a cul de See also:

sac similar to that in which certain rigidly conservative Oriental nations find themselves, e.g. the Arabs and See also:Chinese, who, not possessing a literary language suited to modern requirements, have to content themselves with the dead Old-Arabic or the ossified See also:Mandarin language. The See also:divorce of the written and spoken languages is the most prominent and also the most fatal heritage that the modern' Greeks have received from their Byzantine forefathers. The whole Byzantine intellectual life, like that of the Western See also:medieval period, is dominated by theological interests. Theology accordingly, in literature too, occupies the chief place, 6enerat in regard to both quantity and quality. Next to it character comes the writing of history, which the Byzantines ofBycultivated with great conscientiousness until after zantino the fall of the empire. All other kinds of prose writing, tlterature. e.g. in geography, philosophy, rhetoric and the technical sciences, were comparatively neglected, and such works are of value for the most part only in so far as they preserve and interpret old material. In poetry, again, theology takes the See also:lead. The poetry of the Church produced works of high aesthetic merit and enduring value. In secular poetry, the writing of epigrams especially was cultivated with assiduity and often with ability. In popular literature poetry predominates, and many productions worthy of See also:notice, new both in matter and in form, are here met with.

The great classical period of Greek theological literature is that of the 4th century. Various factors contributed to this result—some of them See also:

positive, particularly the Theology. establishment of Christianity as the See also:official religion and the See also:protection accorded to it by the state, others negative, i.e. the heretical movements, especially Arianism, which at this period arose in the east of the empire and threatened the unity of the doctrine and organization of the church. It was chiefly against these that the subtle Athanasius of Alexandria directed his attacks. The learned Eusebius founded a new department of literature, church history. In Egypt, See also:Antonius (St See also:Anthony) founded the Greek monastic system; Synesius of Cyrene; like his greater contemporary Augustine in the West, represents both in his life and in his writings the difficult transition from Plato to Christ. At the centre, in the forefront of the great intellectual movement of this century, stand the three great Cappadocians, Basil the Great, the subtle dogmatist, his brother Gregory of Nyssa, the philosophically trained defender of the Christian faith, and Gregory of Nazianzus, the distinguished orator and poet. Closely allied to them was St Chrysostom, the courageous See also:champion of ecclesiastical See also:liberty and of moral purity. To modern readers the greater part of this literature appears strange and foreign; but, in order to be appreciated rightly, it must be regarded as the outcome of the period in which it was produced, a period stirred to its depths by religious emotions. For the times in which they lived and for their readers, the Greek fathers reached the highest attainable; though, of course, they produced nothing of such general human cepit) repeated itself in the conquest of the East by Greece, though to a minor extent and in a different way. The whole literature of Egypt, Syria and Asia Minor cannot, despite its See also:international and cosmopolitan character, disavow the influence of the Oriental soil on which it was nourished. Yet the growth of too strong a local colouring in its literature was repressed, partly by the checks imposed by ancient Greek tradition, partly by the spirit of Christianity which reconciled all national distinctions. Even more clearly and unmistakably is Oriental influence shown in the province of Byzantine art, as See also:Joseph Strzygowski has conclusively proved.

The greater portion of Greek literature from the close of ancient times down to the See also:

threshold of modern history was Language. written in a language identical in its principal features with the common literary language, the so-called Koine, which had its origin in the Alexandrian age. This is the literary form of Greek as a universal language, though a form that scintillates with many facets, from an almost Attic diction down to one that approaches the language of everyday life such as we have, for instance, in the New Testament. From what has been already said, it follows that this See also:stable literary language cannot always have remained a language of ordinary life. For, like every living See also:tongue, the vernacular Greek continu-v ally changed in See also:pronunciation and form, as well as in vocabulary and grammar, and thus the living language surely and gradually separated itself from the rigid written language. This gulf was, moreover, considerably widened owing to the fact that there took place in the written language a See also:retrograde movement, the so-called " Atticism." Introduced by Dionysius of Halicarnassus in the. 1st century before Christ, this linguistic-literary See also:fashion attained its greatest height in the and century A.D., but still continued to flourish in succeeding centuries, and, indirectly, throughout the whole Byzantine period. It is true that it often seemed as though the living language would be gradually introduced into literature; for several writers, such as the chronicler See also:Malalas in the 6th century, See also:Leontius of Neapolis (the author of Lives of See also:Saints) in the 7th century, the chronicler See also:Theophanes at the beginning of the 9th century, and the emperor Constantine Porphyrogenitus in the loth century, made in their writings numerous concessions to the living language. This progressive tendency might well have led, in the rrth and lath centuries to the See also:founding in the Greek vernacular of a new literary language similar to the promising national languages and literature which, at that period, in the Romance countries, developed out of the despised popular idiom. In the case of the Byzantines, unfortunately, such a radical change never took place. All attempts in the direction of a popular reform of the literary language, which were occasionally made in the period from the 6th to the loth centuries, were in turn extinguished by the resuscitation of classical studies, a movement which, begun in the 9th century by See also:Photius and continued in the nth by See also:Psellus, attained its full development under the Comneni and the Palaeologi. This classical See also:renaissance turned back the literary language into the old ossified forms, as had previously happened in the case of the Atticism of the early centuries of the empire. In the West, See also:humanism (so closely connected with the Byzantine renaissance under the Comneni and the Palaeologi) also artificially reintroduced the " Ciceronian " Latin, but was unable seriously to endanger the development of the national languages, which had already attained to full vitality.

In See also:

Byzantium, the humanistic movement came prematurely, and crushed the new language before it had fairly established itself. Thus the language of the Byzantine writers of the r rth–r 5th centuries is almost Old Greek in See also:colour; artificially learnt by grammar, See also:lexicon and assiduous See also:reading, it followed Attic models more and more slavishly; to such an extent that, in determining the date of works, the paradoxical principle holds good that the more ancient the language, the more recent the author. Owing to this artificial return to ancient Greek, the contrast that had long existed with the vernacular was now for the first interest, nothing so deep and true, as the Confessions of St Augustine, with which the poetical autobiography of Gregory of Nazianzus cannot for a moment be compared. The glorious See also:bloom of the 4th century was followed by a perceptible decay in theological intellectual activity. Independent production was in succeeding centuries almost solely prompted by divergent dogmatical views and heresies, for the refutation of which orthodox authors were impelled to take up the See also:pen. In the 5th and 6th centuries a more copious literature was called into existence by the Monophysites, who maintained that there was but one nature in Christ; in the 7th century by the See also:Monothelites, who acknowledged but one will in Christ; in the 8th century by the See also:Iconoclasts and by the new teaching of See also:Mahomet. One very eminent theologian, whose importance it has been reserved for modern times to estimate aright—Leontius of Byzantium (6th century)—was the first to introduce Aristotelian See also:definitions into theology, and may thus be called the first scholastic. In his works he attacked the heretics of his age, particularly the Monophysites, who were also assailed by his contemporary See also:Anastasius of Antioch. The chief adversaries of the Monothelites were See also:Sophronius, See also:patriarch of See also:Jerusalem (whose main importance, however, is due to his work in other fields, in hagiography and See also:homiletics), See also:Maximus the See also:Confessor, and Anastasius Sinaites, who also composed an interpretation of the Hexaemeron in twelve books. Among writers in the departments of critical interpretation and See also:asceticism in this period must be enumerated See also:Procopius of Gaza, who devoted himself principally to the exegesis of the Old Testament; Johannes Climax (6th century), named after his much-read ascetic work Klimax (See also:Jacob's See also:ladder); and Johannes Moschus (d. 619), whose chief work Leimon (" spiritual pasture ") describes monastic life in the form of statements and narratives of their experiences by monks themselves. The last great See also:heresy, which shook the Greek Church to its very foundations, the Iconoclast movement, summoned to the fray the last great Greek theologian, See also:John of See also:Damascus (Johannes Damascenus).

Yet his chief merit lies not so much in his polemical speeches against the Iconoclasts, and in his much admired but over-refined poetry, as in his great dogmatic work, 7'he See also:

Fountain of Knowledge, which contains the first comprehensive exposition of Christian See also:dogma. It has remained the standard work on Greek theology down to the present day. Just as the See also:internal development of the Greek Church in all essentials reached its limit with the Iconoclasts, so also its productive intellectual activity ceased with John of Damascus. Such theological works as were subsequently produced, consisted mostly in the interpretation and revision of old materials. An extremelycopious, but unfruitful, literature was produced by the disputes about the See also:reunion of the Greek and Roman Churches. Of a more independent character is the literature which in the 14th century centred See also:round the dissensions of the See also:Hesychasts. Among theologians after John of Damascus must be mentioned : the emperor See also:Leo VI., the See also:Wise (886-911), who wrote numerous homilies and church hymns, and See also:Theodorus of Studium (759-826), who in his numerous writings affords us instructive glimpses of monastic life. Pre-eminent stands the figure of the patriarch Photius. Yet his importance consists less in his writings, which often, to a remarkable extent, lack independence of thought and judgment, than in his activity as a See also:prince of the church. For he it was who carried the See also:differences which had already repeatedly arisen between Rome and Constantinople to a point at which reconciliation was impossible, and was mainly instrumental in preparing the way for the separation of. the Greek and Latin Churches accomplished in 1054 under the patriarch See also:Michael Cerularius. In the 11th century the polyhistor Michael Psellus also wrote polemics against the Euchites, among whom the Syrian Gnosis was reviving. All literature, including theology, experienced a considerable revival under the Comneni.

In the reign of Alexius I. See also:

Comnenus (1081-II18), Euthymius Zigabenus wrote his great dogmatic work, the Dogmatic See also:Panoply, which, like The Fountain of Knowledge of John of Damascus in earlier times, was partly positive, furnishing an armoury oftheology, partly negative and directed against the sects. In addition to attacking the dead and buried doctrines of the Monothelites, Iconoclasts, &c., to fight which was at this time a mere tilting at windmills, Zigabenus also carried on a polemic against the heretics of his own day, the Armenians, See also:Bogomils and See also:Saracens. Zigabenus's Panoply was continued and enlarged a century later by the historian Nicetas See also:Acominatus, who published it under the title Treasure of Orthodoxy. To the writings against ancient heresies were next added a See also:flood of tracts, of all shapes and sizes, " against the Latins," i.e. against the Roman Church, and among their authors must also be enumerated an emperor, the gifted See also:Theodore II. See also:Lascaris (1254-'258). The chief champion of the union with the Roman Church was the learned Johannes Beccus (patriarch of Constantinople 1275-1282). Of his opponents by far the most eminent was Gregory of Cyprus, who succeeded him on the patriarchal See also:throne. The fluctuations in the fortunes of the two ecclesiastical parties are reflected in the occupation of the patriarchal throne. The battles round the question of the union, which were waged with See also:southern passion, were for a while checked by the dissensions aroused by the mystic tendency of the Hesychasts. The impetus to this great literary movement was given by the See also:monk Barlaam, a native of See also:Calabria, who came forward in Constantinople as an opponent of the Latins and was in 1339 entrusted by Andronicus III. with a See also:mission to Pope See also:Benedict XII. at See also:Avignon. He condemned the doctrine of the Hesychasts, and attacked them both orally and in writing.

Among those who shared his views are conspicuous the historian Nicephorus See also:

Gregoras and Gregorius Acindynus, the latter of whom closely followed See also:Thomas See also:Aquinas in his writings. In fact the struggle against the Hesychasts was essentially a struggle between sober western See also:scholasticism and dreamy Graeco-Oriental See also:mysticism. On the side of the Hesychasts fought Gregorius See also:Palamas, who tried to give a dogmatic foundation to the mysticism of the Hesychasts, See also:Cabasilas, and the emperor John VI. Cantacuzenus who, after his deposition, sought, in the peaceful retreat of a monastery, See also:consolation in theological studies, and in his literary works refuted the See also:Jews and the Mahommedans. For the greatest Byzantine "apologia" against Islamism we are indebted to an emperor, Manuel II. See also:Palaeologus (1391-1425), who by learned discussions tried to make up for the deficiency in See also:martial prowess shown by the Byzantines in their struggle with the See also:Turks. On the whole, theological literature was in the last century of the empire almost completely occupied with the struggles for and against the union with Rome. The reason lay in the political conditions. The emperors saw more and more clearly that without the aid of the West they would no longer be able to stand their ground against the Turks, the vanguard of the armies of the See also:Crescent; while the See also:majority of Byzantine theologians feared that the assistance of the West would force the Greeks to unite with Rome, and thereby to forfeit their ecclesiastical independence. Considering the supremacy of the theological party in Byzantium, it was but natural that religious considerations should gain the day over political; and this was the view almost universally held by the Byzantines in the later centuries of the empire; in the words of the chronicler See also:Ducas: "it is better to fall into the hands of the Turks than into those of the Franks." The chief opponent of the union was Marcus Eugenicus, See also:metropolitan of Ephesus, who, at the See also:Council of Florence in 1439, denounced the union with Rome accomplished by John VIII. Palaeologus. Conspicuous there among the partisans of the union, by reason of his erudition and general literary merit, was See also:Bessarion, after-wards See also:cardinal, whose chief activity already falls under the head of Graeco-Italian humanism.

Hagiography, i.e. the literature of the acts of the martyrs and the lives of the saints, forms an independent See also:

group and one comparatively unaffected by dogmatic struggles. Hagto-The main interest centres here round the See also:objects graphy. described, the personalities of the martyrs and saints themselves. The authors, on the other hand—the Acts of the Martyrs are mostly See also:anonymous—keep more in the background than in other branches of literature. The man whose name is mainly identified with Greek hagiography, Symeon Metaphrastes, is important not as an original author, but only as an editor. Symeon revised in the loth century, according to the rhetorical and linguistic principles of his day, numerous old Acts of the Martyrs, and incorporated them in a collection consisting of several volumes, which was circulated in innumerable copies, and thus to a great extent superseded the older original texts. These Acts of the Martyrs, in point of time, are anterior to our period; but of the Lives of Saints the greater portion belong to Byzantine literature. They began with See also:biographies of monks distinguished for their saintly living, such as were used by See also:Palladius about 420 in his Historia Lausiaca. The most famous work of this description is that by Athanasius of Alexandria, viz. the biography of St Anthony, the founder of monachism. In the 6th century See also:Cyril of Scythopolis wrote several lives of saints, distinguished by a simple and straightforward style. More See also:expert than any one else in reproducing the naive popular style was Leontius of Neapolis in Cyprus who, in the 7th century, wrote, among other works, a life of St John the Merciful, See also:arch-See also:bishop of Alexandria, which is very remarkable as illustrating the social and intellectual conditions of the time. From the popular Lives of Saints, which for the reading public of the middle ages formed the chief substitute for modern " belles lettres," it is easy to trace the transition to the religious novel.

End of Article: GREEK LITERATURE

Additional information and Comments

There are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click, and select "copy." Then paste it into your website, email, or other HTML.
Site content, images, and layout Copyright © 2006 - Net Industries, worldwide.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.

Links to articles and home page are always encouraged.

[back]
GREEK LAW
[next]
GREEK RELIGION