Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
See also:GREEK See also:ART . It is proposed in the See also:present See also:article to give a brief See also:account of the See also:history of Greek art and of the principles embodied in that history. In any broad view of history, the products of the various arts practised by a See also:people constitute an See also:objective and most important See also:record of the spirit of that people. But all nations have not excelled in the same way: some have found their best expression in See also:architecture, some in See also:music, some in See also:poetry. The Greeks most fully embodied their ideas in two ways, first in their splendid literature, both See also:prose and See also:verse, and secondly, in their plastic and pictorial art, in which See also:matter they have remained to our days among the greatest instructors of mankind. The three arts of architecture, See also:sculpture and See also:painting were brought by them into a See also:focus; and by their aid they produced a visible splendour of public See also:life such as has perhaps been nowhere else attained. The See also:volume of the remains of Greek See also:civilization is so vast, and the learning with which these have been discussed is so ample, that it is hopeless to See also:attempt to give in a See also:work like the present any See also:complete account of either. Rather we shall be frankly eclectic, choosing for See also:consideration such results of Greek art as are most noteworthy and most characteristic. In some cases it will be possible to give a reference to a more detailed treatment of particular monuments in these volumes under the heading of the places to which they belong. Architectural detail is relegated to ARCHITECTURE and allied architectural articles. Coins (see See also:NUMISMATICS) and gems (see GEMS) are treated apart, as are vases (See also:CERAMICS), and in the bibliography which closes this article an effort is made to See also:direct those who wish for further See also:information in any particular See also:branch of our subject. 1. The Rediscovery of Greek Art.—The visible See also:works of Greek architect, sculptor and painter, accumulated in the cities of See also:Greece and See also:Asia See also:Minor until the See also:Roman See also:conquest. And in spite of the ravages of conquering Roman generals, and the more systematic despoilings of the emperors, we know that when See also:Pausanias visited Greece, in the See also:age of the Antonines, it was from See also:coast to coast a museum of works of art of all ages. But the See also:tide soon turned. Works of originality were no longer produced, and a See also:succession of disasters gradually obliterated those of previous ages. In the course of the See also:Teutonic and See also:Slavonic invasions from the See also:north, or in consequence of earthquakes, very frequent in Greece, the splendid cities and temples See also:fell into ruins; and with the taking of See also:Constantinople by the See also:Franks in 1204 the last See also:great collection of works of Greek sculpture disappeared. But while paintings-decayed, and works in See also:metal were melted down, many See also:marble buildings and statues survived, at least in a mutilated See also:condition, while terra-See also:cotta is almost See also:proof against decay.
With the See also:Renaissance See also:attention was directed to the extant remains of Greek and Roman art; as See also:early as the 15th See also:century collections of See also:ancient sculpture,coins and gems began to be formed in See also:Italy; and in the 16th the See also:enthusiasm spread to See also:Germany and See also:France. The See also:earl of See also:Arundel, in the reign of See also: The second See also:stage in the recovery of Greek art begins with the permission accorded by the See also:Porte to Lord See also:Elgin in 1800 to re-move to England the sculptural decoration of the See also:Parthenon and other buildings of See also:Athens. These splendid works, after various vicissitudes, became the See also:property of the See also:English nation, and are now the See also:chief treasures of the See also:British Museum. The sight of them was a See also:revelation to critics and artists, accustomed only to the See also:base copies which fill the Italian galleries, and a new See also:epoch in the appreciation of Greek art began. English and See also:German savants, among whom See also:Cockerell and Stackelberg were conspicuous, recovered the glories of the temples of See also:Aegina and Bassae. See also:Leake and See also:Ross, and later See also:Curtius, journeyed through the length and breadth of Greece, identifying ancient sites and studying the monuments which were above ground. Ross re-constructed the See also:temple of See also:Athena See also:Nike on the See also:Acropolis of Athens from fragments rescued from a See also:Turkish See also:bastion.
Meantime more methodical exploration brought to See also:light the remains of remarkable civilizations in Asia, not only in the valley of the See also:Euphrates, but in See also:Lycia, whence See also:Sir See also: More recently See also:French explorers have made a very thorough examination of the site of See also:Delphi, and have succeeded in recovering almost complete two small treasuries, those of the people of Athens and of Cnidus or Siphnos, the latter of 6th-century Ionian work, and adorned with extremely important sculpture. No other site of the same importance as Athens, Olympia and Delphi remains for excavation in Greece proper. But in all parts of the country, at See also:Tegea, See also:Corinth, See also:Sparta and on a number of other ancient sites, striking and important monuments have come to light. And at the same See also:time monuments already known in Italy and See also:Sicily, such as the temples of See also:Paestum, See also:Selinus and See also:Agrigentum have been re-examined with See also:fuller knowledge and better See also:system. Only Asia Minor, under the See also:influence of Turkish See also:rule, has remained a country where systematic exploration is difficult. Something, however, has been accomplished atEphesus, Priene, Assos and See also:Miletus, and great works of sculpture such as the reliefs of the great See also:altar at See also:Pergamum, now at See also:Berlin, and the splendid sarcophagi from See also:Sidon, now at Constantinople, show what might be expected from methodic investigation of the wealthy Greek cities of Asia. From further excavations at See also:Herculaneum we may expect a See also:rich See also:harvest of works of art of the highest class, such as have already been found in the excavations on that site in the past; and the See also:building operations at See also:Rome are constantly bringing to light See also:fine statues brought from Greece in the time of the See also:Empire, which are now placed in the collections of the Capitol and the See also:Baths of See also:Diocletian. The work of explorers on Greek sites requires as its See also:complement and corrective much labour in the great museums of See also:Europe. As museum work apart from exploration tends to dilettantism and pedantry, so exploration by itself does not produce reasoned knowledge. When a new building, a great original statue, a See also:series of vases is discovered, these have to be fitted in to the existing See also:frame of our knowledge; and it is by such fitting in that the edifice of knowledge is enlarged. In all the museums and See also:universities of Europe the fresh examination of new monuments, the study of See also:style and subject, and attempts to work out points in the history of ancient art, are incessantly going on. Such archaeological work is an important See also:element in the See also:gradual See also:education of the world, and is fruitful, quite apart from the particular results attained, because it encourages a method of thought. See also:Archaeology, dealing with things which can be seen and handled, yet being a See also:species of historic study, lies on the borderland between the See also:province of natural See also:science and that of historic science, and furnishes a See also:bridge whereby the methods of investigation proper to See also:physical and biological study may pass into the human See also: One instance may serve to See also:mark the rapidity of our advance. When the remains of the Mausoleum were brought to London from the excavations begun by Sir Charles Newton in 1856 we knew from See also:Pliny that four great sculptors, See also:Scopas, See also:Bryaxis, Leochares and See also:Timotheus, had worked on the sculpture; but we knew of these artists little more than the names. At present we possess many fragments of two pediments at Tegea executed under the direction of Scopas, we have a basis with reliefs signed by Bryaxis, we have identified a See also:group in the Vatican museum as a copy of the See also:Ganymede of Leochares, and we have pedimental remains from See also:Epidaurus which we know from inscriptional See also:evidence to be either the works of Timotheus or made from his See also:models. Any one can See also:judge how enormously our See also:power of criticizing the Mausoleum sculptures, and of comparing them with contemporary monuments, has increased. In regard to ancient painting we can of course expect no such fresh See also:illumination. Many important See also:wall-paintings of the Roman age have been found at Rome and Pompeii: but we have no certain or even probable work of any great Greek painter. We 'have to content ourselves with studying the colouring of reliefs, such as those' of the sarcophagi at Constantinople, and the drawings on vases, in See also:order to get some notion of the See also:composition and See also:drawing of painted scenes in the great age of Greece. As to the portraits of the Roman age painted on wood which have come in considerable quantities from See also:Egypt, they stand at a farlower level than even the paintings of Pompeii. The number of our See also:vase-paintings, however, increases steadily, and whole classes, such as the early vases of See also:Ionia, are being marked off from the See also:crowd, and so becoming available for use in illustrating the history of Hellenic civilization. The study of Greek art is thus one which is eminently progressive. It has over the study of Greek literature the immense See also:advantage that its materials increase far more rapidly. And it is becoming more and more evident that a See also:sound and methodic study of Greek art is quite as indispensable as a See also:foundation for an See also:artistic and archaeological education as the study of Greek poets and orators is as a. basis of See also:literary education. The extreme simplicity and thorough rationality of Greek art make it an unrivalled field for the training and exercise of the faculties which go to the making of the art-critic and art historian. 2. The See also:General Principles of Greek Art.—Before proceeding to See also:sketch the history of the rise and decline of Greek art, it is desirable briefly to set forth the principles which underlie it (see also P. See also:Gardner's See also:Grammar of Greek Art). As the literature of Greece is composed in a particular See also:language, the grammar and the syntax of which have to be studied before the works in poetry and prose can be read, so Greek works of art are composed in what may be called an artistic language. To the See also:accidence of a grammar may be compared the See also:mere technique of sculpture and painting: to the syntax of a grammar correspond the principles of composition and grouping of individual figures into a See also:relief or picture. By means of the rules of this grammar the Greek artist threw into form the ideas which belonged to him as a See also:personal or a racial See also:possession. We may mention first some of the more See also:external conditions of Greek art; next, some of those which the Greek spirit posited for itself. No nation is in its works wholly See also:free from the domination of See also:climate and See also:geographical position; least of all a people so keenly alive to the influence of the See also:outer world as the Greeks. They lived in a See also:land where the See also:soil was dry and rocky, far less hospitable to vegetation than that of western Europe, while on all sides the See also:horizon of the land was bounded by hard and jagged lines of See also:mountain. The See also:sky was extremely clear and See also:bright, See also:sunshine for a great See also:part of the See also:year almost perpetual, and storms, which are more than passing See also:gales, rare. It was in accordance with these natural features that temples and other buildings should be See also:simple in form and bounded by clear lines. Such forms as the See also:cube, the oblong, the See also:cylinder, the triangle, the See also:pyramid abound in their constructions. Just as in See also:Switzerland the gables of the chalets match the See also:pine-clad slopes and lofty summits of the mountains, so in Greece, amid barer hills of less See also:elevation, the Greek temple looks thoroughly in place. But its construction is related not only to the See also:surface of the land, but also to the See also:character of the See also:race. M. Emile Boutmy, in his interesting Philosophie de l'architecture en Grece, has shown how the temple is a See also:triumph of the senses and the See also:intellect, not primarily emotional, but showing in every part definite purpose and See also:design. It also exhibits in a remarkable degree the love of See also:balance, of symmetry, of a mathematical proportion of parts and correctness of curvature which belong to the Greek artist. The purposes of a Greek temple may be readily judged from its See also:plan: Primarily it was the See also:abode of the deity, whose statue dwelt in it as men dwell in their own houses. Hence the See also:cella or naos is the central feature of the building. Here was placed the See also:image to which See also:worship was brought, while the treasures belonging to the See also:god were disposed partly in the cella itself, partly in a See also:kind of See also:treasury which often existed, as in the Parthenon, behind the cella. There was in large temples a See also:porch of approach, the promos, and another behind, the opisthodomos. Temples were not meant for, nor accommodated to, See also:regular services or a throng of worshippers. Processions and festivals took place in the open See also:air, in the streets and See also:fields, and men entered the abodes of the gods at most in See also:groups and families, commonly alone. Thus when a place had been found for the statue, which stood for the presence of the god, for the small altar of See also:incense, for the implements of cult and the gifts of votaries, little space remained free, and great spaces or subsidiary chapels such as are usual in See also:Christian cathedrals did not exist (see TEMPLE). Here our concern is not with the purposes or arrangements of a temple, but with its See also:appearance and construction, regarded as a work of art, and as an embodiment of Greek ideas. A few simple and striking principles may be formulated, which are characteristic of all Greek buildings: (i.) Each member of the building has one See also:function, and only one, and this function controls even the decoration of that member. The See also:pillar of a temple is made to support the See also:architrave and is for that purpose only. The flutings of the pillar, being perpendicular, emphasize this fact. The See also:line of support which runs up through the pillar is continued in the See also:triglyph, which also shows perpendicular grooves. On the other See also:hand, the wall of a temple is primarily meant to See also:divide or space off; thus it may well at the See also:top be decorated by a See also:horizontal See also:band of relief, which belongs to it as a border belongs to a See also:curtain. The base of a See also:column, if moulded, is moulded in such a way as to suggest support of a great See also:weight; the See also:capital of a column is so carved as to form a transition between the column and the See also:cornice which it supports. (ii.) Greek architects took the utmost pains with the proportions, the symmetry as they called it, of the parts of their buildings. This was a thing in which the keen and methodical eyes of the Greeks delighted, to a degree which a See also:modern finds it hard to understand. Simple and natural relations, z 2, I :3, 2 :3 and the like, prevailed between various members of a construction. All curves were planned with great care, to please the See also:eye with their flow; and the alternations and correspondences of features is visible at a glance. For example, the temple must have two pediments and two porches, and on its sides and fronts triglyph and See also:metope must alternate with unvarying regularity. (iii.) Rigidity in the simple lines of a temple is avoided by the See also:device that scarcely any outline is actually straight. All are carefully planned and adapted to the eye of the spectator. In the Parthenon the line of the See also:floor is curved, the profiles of the columns are curved, the corner columns slope inward from their bases, the columns are not even equidistant. This elaborate See also:adaptation, called See also:entasis, was expounded by F. C. Penrose in his work on Athenian architecture, and has since been observed in several of the great temples of Greece. (iv.) Elaborate decoration is reserved for those parts of the temple which have, or at least appear to have, no See also:strain laid upon them. It is true that in the archaic age experiments were made in See also:carving reliefs on the See also:lower drums of columns (as at Ephesus) and on the line of the architrave (as at See also:Assus). But such examples were not followed. Nearly always the spaces reserved for mythological reliefs or groups are the tops of walls, the spaces between the triglyphs, and particularly the pediments surmounting the two fronts, which might be .eft hollow without danger to the stability of the edifice. Detached figures in the See also:round are in fact found only in the pediments, or See also:standing upon the tops of the pediments. And metopes are sculptured in higher relief than friezes. " When we examine in detail even the simplest architectural decoration, we discover a See also:combination of care, sense of proportion, and See also:reason. The flutings of an Ionic column are not in See also:section mere arcs of a circle, but made up of a combination of curveswhich produce a beautiful See also:optical effect; the lines of decoration, as may he best seen in the See also:case of the Erechtheum, are cut with a marvellous delicacy. Instead of trying to invent . new schemes, the See also:mason contents himself with improving the regular patterns until they approach perfection, and he takes everything into consideration. See also:Mouldings on the outside of a temple, in the full light of the See also:sun, are differently planned from those in the diffused light of the interior. Mouldings executed in soft stone are less fine than those in marble. The mason thinks before he works, and while he works, and thinks in entire See also:correspondence with his surroundings." 1 Greek architecture, however, is treated elsewhere (see ARCHITECTURE); we will therefore proceed to speak briefly of the principles exemplified in sculpture. Existing works of Greek Grammar of Greek Art.sculpture fall easily into two classes. The first class comprises what may be called works of substantive art, statues or groups made for their own See also:sake and to be judged by themselves. Such are cult-statues of gods and goddesses from temple and shrine, honorary portraits of rulers or of athletes, dedicated groups and the like. The second class comprises decorative sculptures, such as were made, usually in relief, for the decoration of temples and tombs and other buildings, and were intended to be sub-See also:ordinate to architectural effect. Speaking broadly, it may be said that the works of substantive sculpture in our museums are in the great See also:majority of cases copies of doubtful exactness and very various merit. The Hermes of Praxiteles is almost the only marble statue which can be assigned positively to one of the great sculptors; we have to work back towards the productions of the peers of Praxiteles through works of poor See also:execution, often so much restored in modern times as to be scarcely recognizable. Decorative works, on the other hand, are very commonly originals, and their date can often be accurately fixed, as they belong to known buildings. They are thus infinitely more trustworthy and more easy to See also:deal with than the copies of statues of which the museums of Europe, and more especially those of Italy, are full. They are also more commonly unrestored. But yet there are certain disadvantages attaching to them. Decorative works, even when carried out under the supervision of a great sculptor, were but seldom executed by him. Usually they were the productions of his pupils or masons. Thus they are not on the same level of art as substantive sculpture. And they vary in merit to an extraordinary extent, according to the capacity of the. See also:man who happened to have them in hand, and who was probably but little. controlled. Every one knows how See also:noble are the pedimental sculptures of the Parthenon. But we know no reason why they should be so vastly See also:superior to the See also:frieze from See also:Phigalia; nor why the heads from the temple at Tegea should be so fine, while those from the contemporary temple at Epidaurus should be comparatively insignificant. From the records of payments made to the sculptors who worked on the Erechtheum at Athens it appears that they were.See also:ordinary masons, some of them not even citizens, and paid at the See also:rate of 6o drachms (about 6o francs) for each figure, whether of man or See also:horse, which they produced. Such piece-work would not, in our days, produce a very satisfactory result. Works of substantive sculpture may be divided into two classes, the statues of human beings and those of the gods. The line between the two is not, however, very easy to draw, or very definite. For in representing men the Greek sculptor had an irresistible inclination to idealize, to represent what was generic and typical rather than what ' was individual, and the essential rather than the accidental. And in representing deities he so fully anthropomorphized them that they became men and See also:women, only raised above the level of everyday life and endowed with a superhuman stateliness. Moreover, there was a class of heroes represented largely in art who covered the transition from men to gods. For example, if one regards Heracles as a deity and See also:Achilles as a man of the heroic age and of heroic See also:mould, the line between the two will be found to be very narrow. Nevertheless one may for convenience speak first of human and afterwards of divine figures. It was the See also:custom from the 6th century onwards to See also:honour those who had done any great achievement by setting up their statues in conspicuous positions. One of the earliest examples is that of the tyrannicides, See also:Harmodius and Aristogiton, a group, a copy of which has come down to us (See also:Plate I. fig. So 2). Again, people who had not won any distinction were in the See also:habit of dedicating to the deities portraits of themselves or of a See also:priest or priestess, thus bringing themselves, as it were, constantly under the See also:notice of a divine See also:patron. The rows of statues before the temples at Miletus, Athens and 2 It may here be pointed out that it was found impossible, with any regard for the appearance of the pages, to arrange the Plates for this article so as to preserve a See also:chronological order in the individual figures; they are not arranged consecutively as regards the history or the See also:period, and are only grouped for convenience in paging.—Ed. elsewhere See also:camel thus into being. But from the point of view of art, by far the most important class of portraits consisted of athletes who had won victories at some of the great• See also:games of Greece, at Olympia, Delphi ; or elsewhere. Early in the 6th century, the custom arose of setting up portraits of athletic victors in the great sacred places. We have records of number-less such statues executed by all the greatest sculptors. When Pausanias visited Greece he found them everywhere far too numerous for complete mention. It is the custom of studying and copying the forms of the finest of the See also:young athletes, combined with the Greek habit of complete nudity during the See also:sports, which lies at the basis of Greek excellence in sculpture. Every sculptor had unlimited opportunities for observing young vigorous bodies in every pose and in every variety of strain. The natural sense of beauty which was an endowment of the Greek race impelled him to copy and preserve what was excellent, and to omit what was ungainly or poor. Thus there existed, and in fact there was constantly accumulating, a vast series of types of male beauty, and the public See also:taste was cultivated to an extreme delicacy. And of course this taste, though it took its start from athletic customs, and was mainly nurtured by them, spread to all branches of See also:portraiture, so that elderly men, women, and at last even See also:children, were represented in art with a mixture of ideality and fidelity to nature such as has not been reached by the sculpture of any other people. The statues of the gods began either with stiff and ungainly figures roughly cut out of the See also:trunk of a See also:tree, or with the monstrous and symbolical representations of See also:Oriental art. In the Greece of See also:late times there were still standing See also:rude pillars, with the, tops sometimes cut into a rough likeness to the human form. And in early decoration of vases and vessels one may find Greek deities represented with wings, carrying in their hands lions or griffins, bearing on their heads lofty crowns. But as Greek art progressed it See also:grew out of this crude symbolism. In the language of See also:Brunn, the Greek artists borrowed from Oriental or Mycenaean See also:sources the letters used in their works, but with these letters they spelled out the ideas of their own nation. What the artists of See also:Babylon and Egypt See also:express in the character of the gods by added attribute or See also:symbol, swiftness by wings, See also:control of storms by the thunderbolt,. traits of character by See also:animal heads, the artists of Greece work more and more fully into the sculptural type; modifying the human subject by the See also:constant addition of something which is above the ordinary level of humanity, until we reach the See also:Zeus of See also:Pheidias or the Demeter of Cnidus. When the decay of the high ethical art of Greece sets in, the gods become more and more warped to the merely human level. They lose their dignity, but they never lose their See also:charm. The decorative sculpture of Greece consists not of single figures, but of groups; and in the arrangement of these groups the strict Greek See also:laws of symmetry, of See also:rhythm, and of balance, come in. We will take the three most usual forms, the See also:pediment, the metope and the frieze, all of which belong properly to the temple, but are characteristic of all decoration, whether of See also:tomb, See also:trophy or other monument. The form of the pediment is triangular; the height of the triangle in proportion to its length being about r : 8. The conditions of space are here strict and dominant; to comply with them requires some ingenuity. To a modern sculptor the problem thus presented is almost insoluble; but it was allowable in ancient art to represent figures in a single composition as of various sizes, in correspondence not to actual physical measurement but to importance. As the more important figures naturally occupy the midmost place in a pediment, their greater See also:size comes in conveniently. And by placing some of the persons of the group in a standing, some in a seated, some in a reclining position, it can be so contrived that their heads are equidistant from the upper line of the pediment. The statues in a Greek pediment, which are after quite an early period usually executed in the round, fall into three, five or seven groups, according to the size of the whole. As examplesto illustrate this exposition we take the two pediments of the temple at Olympia, the most complete which have come down: to us, which are represented in See also:figs. 33 and 34. The See also:east pediment represents the preparation for the See also:chariot race between See also:Pelops and See also:Oenomaus. The central group consists of five figures, Zeus standing between the two pairs of competitors and their wives. In the corners recline the two See also:river-gods See also:Alpheus and Cladeus, who mark the locality; and the two sides are filled up with the closely corresponding groups of the chariots of Oenomaus and Pelops with their grooms and attendants. Every figure to the See also:left of Zeus balances a corresponding figure on his right, and all the lines of the composition slope towards a point above the See also:apex of the pediment. In the opposite or western pediment is represented the See also:battle between Lapiths and See also:Centaurs which See also:broke out at the See also:marriage of Peirithous in See also:Thessaly. Here we have no less than nine groups. In the midst is See also:Apollo. On each See also:side of him is a group of three, a centaur trying to carry off a woman and a Lapith striking at him. Beyond these on each side is a struggling pair, next once more a trio of two combatants and a woman, and finally in each corner two reclining See also:female figures, the outermost apparently See also:nymphs to mark locality. A careful examination of these compositions will show the reader more clearly than detailed description how clearly in this kind of group Greek artists adhered to the rules of rhythm and of balance. The metopes were the See also:long series of square spaces which ran along the outer walls of temples between the upright triglyphs and the cornice. Originally they may have been left open and served as windows; but the custom came in as early as the 7th century, first of filling them in with painted boards or slabs of stone, and next of adorning them with sculpture. The metopes of the Treasury of See also:Sicyon at Delphi (Plate IV. fig. 66) are as early as the first See also:half of the 6th century. This recurrence of a long series of square fields for occupation well suited the See also:genius and the habits of the sculptor. As subjects he took the successive exploits of some See also:hero such as Heracles or See also:Theseus, or the See also:con-temporary groups of a battle. His number of figures was limited to two or three, and these figures had to be worked into a group or See also:scheme, the See also:main features of which were determined by artistic tradition, but which could be varied in a See also:hundred ways so as to produce a pleasing and in some degree novel result. With metopes, as regards shape, we may compare the reliefs of Greek tombs,. which also usually occupy a space roughly square, and which also comprise but a few figures arranged in a scheme generally traditional. A figure standing giving his hand to one seated, two men standing hand in hand, or a single figure in some vigorous pose is sufficient to satisfy the simple but severe taste of the Greeks. In regard to friezes, which are long reliefs containing figures ranged between parallel lines, there is more variety of custom. In temples the height of the relief from the background varies according to the light in which it was to stand, whether direct or ' diffused. Almost all Greek friezes, however, are of great simplicity in arrangement and See also:perspective. Locality is at most hinted at by a few stones or trees, never actually portrayed. There is seldom more than one line of figures, in combat or See also:pro-cession, their heads all equidistant from the top line of the frieze. They are often broken up into groups; and when this is the case, figure will often balance figure on either side of a central point almost as rigidly as in a pediment. An example of this will be found in the section of the Mausoleum frieze shown in fig. 70, Plate IV. Some of the friezes executed by Greek artists for semi-Greek, peoples, such as those adorning the tomb at Trysa in Lycia, have two planes, the figures in the background being at a higher level. The rules of balance and symmetry in composition which are followed in Greek decorative art are still more to be discerned in the paintings of vases, which must serve, in the See also:absence of more dignified compositions, to enlighten us as to the methods of Greek painters. Great painters would not, of course, be See also:bound by architectonic rule in the same degree as the mere workmen who painted vases. Nevertheless we must never forget that Greek painting of the earlier ages was of extreme simplicity. It did not represent localities, See also:save by some slight hint; it had next to no perspective; the See also:colours used were but very few even down to the days of See also:Apelles. Most of the great pictures of which we hear consisted of but one or two figures; and when several figures were introduced they were kept apart and separately treated, though, of course, not without relation to one another. See also:Idealism and ethical purpose must have pre-dominated in painting as in sculpture and in the See also:drama and in the See also:writing of history. We will take from vases a few simple groups to illustrate the laws of Greek drawing; colouring we cannot illustrate. The fields offered to the draughtsman on Greek vases naturally follow the form of the vase; but they may be set down as approximately round, square or oblong. To each of these spaces the artist carefully adapts his designs. In fig. r we have a characteristic adaptation to circular form by the vase painter See also:Epictetus. In the early period of painting all the space not occupied by the figures is filled with patterns or accessories, or even animals which have no connexion with the subject (fig. g). In later and more See also:developed art, as in this example, the outlines of the figures are so arranged as to fill the space. When the space is square we have much the same problem as is presented by the metope spaces of a temple. In the case of both square and oblong fields the laws of balance are carefully observed. Thus if there is an even number of figures in the scheme, two of them will form a sort of centre-piece, those on either side balancing one another. If the number of figures is uneven, either there will be a group of three in the midst, or the midmost figure will be so contrived that he belongs wholly to neither side, but is the balance between them. These remarks will be made clear by figs. 2 and 3, which repeat the two sideswhich represent the defeat of one of these by the other; the vanquished has commonly fallen on his knees, but still defends himself. There is a scheme for the leading away of a See also:captive woman; the captor leads her by the hand looking back at her, while a friend walks behind to See also: Each moved by the traditions of his own See also:craft. The poet took the accepted See also:tale and enshrined it in a setting of feeling. and See also:imagination. The painter took the traditional schemes which were current, and altered or enlarged them, adding new figures and new motives, but not attempting to set aside the general scheme. But varieties suitable to poetry were not likely to be suitable in painting. Thus it is but seldom that a vase-painter seems to have had in his mind, as he drew, passages of the Homeric poems, though these might well be See also:familiar to hin}. And almost never does a vase-painting of the 5th century show any sign of the influence of the dramatists, who were bringing before the Athenian public on the stage many of the tales and incidents popular with the vase-painter. Only on vases of lower Italy of the 4th century and later we can occasion-ally discern something of Aeschylean and Euripidean influence in the treatment of a myth; and even in a few cases we may discern that the vase-painter has taken suggestions direct from the actors in the See also:theatre. 3. Historic Sketch.—We propose next to trace in brief outline the history of Greek art from its rise to its decay. We begin with the rise of a See also:national art, after the destruction of the (Brit. See also:Mus. See also:Catalogue of.Vases, iii. PI. vi. a). FIG. 1.–Kylix by Epictetus. From Wiener Vorlegeblatter, 189o, Pl. viii., by permission of the Director of the K. K. Osten. Archaol. Institut. of an See also:amphora, one of which bears a design of three figures, the other of four. The Greek artist not only adhered to the architectonic laws of balance and symmetry, but he thought in schemes. Certain group arrangements had a recognized signification. There are schemes for warriors fighting on equal terms, and schemes Minoan and Mycenaean civilizations of early Greece by the irruption of tribes from the north, that is to say, about Boo B.C., and we stop with the Roman age of Greece, after which Greek art works in the service of the conquerors (see ROMAN ART). The period 800–5o B.C. we divide into four sections: (I) the period down to the See also:Persian See also:Wars, 80o–48o B.C.; (2) the period of the early See also:schools of art, 48o-40o B.c.; (3) the period of the later great schools, 400-300 B.C.; (4) the period of Hellenistic art, 30o-5o B.C. In dealing with these successive periods we confine our sketch to the three greater branches of representative art, architecture, sculpture and painting, which in Greece are closely connected. The lesser arts, of pottery, gem-See also:engraving, See also:coin-stamping and the like, are treated of under the heads of CERAMICS, GEM, NUMISMATICS, &c., while the more technical treatment of architectural construction are dealt with under ARCHITECTURE and allied architectural articles. Further, for brief accounts of the chief artists the reader is referred to See also:biographical articles, under such heads as PHEImIAS, PRAXITELES, APELLES. We treat here only of the main course of art in its historic See also:evolution. Period I. 800-48o B.c.—The fact is now generally allowed that the Mycenaean, or as it is now termed See also:Aegean, civilization See also:Northern was for the most part destroyed by an invasion from Invasion. the north. This invasion appears to have been gradual; its racial character is much in dispute. Archaeological evidence abundantly proves that it was the conquest of a more by a less rich and civilized race. In the See also:graves of the period (9oo-600 B.C.) we find none of the wealthy spoil which has made celebrated the tombs of See also:Mycenae andVaphio(q.v.). The character of the pottery and the See also:bronze-work which is found in these later graves reminds us of the art of the See also:necropolis of See also:Hallstatt in See also:Austria, and other sites belonging to what is called the bronze age of North Europe. Its predominant characteristic is the use of geometrical forms, the See also:lozenge, the triangle, the maeander, the circle with tangents, in' place of the elaborate spirals and plant-forms which mark Mycenaean See also:ware. For this reason the period from the 9th to the 7th century in Greece passes by the name of " the Geometric Age." It is commonly held that in the remains of the Geometric Age we may trace the influence of the See also:Dorians, who, coming in as a See also:hardy but uncultivated race, probably of purer See also:Aryan See also:blood than the previous inhabitants of Greece, not only brought to an end the See also:wealth and the luxury which marked the Mycenaean age, but also replaced an art which was in character essentially See also:southern by one which belonged rather to the north and the See also:west. The great difficulty inherent in this view, a difficulty which has yet to be met, lies in the fact that some of the most abundant and characteristic remains of the geometric age which we possess come, not from See also:Peloponnesus, but from Athens and See also:Boeotia, which were never conquered by the Dorians. The geometric ware is for the most part adorned with painted patterns only. Fig. 4 is a characteristic example, a small two- handled vase from See also:Rhodes in the Ashmolean Museum, geometric the adornment of which consists in zigzags, circles ware. with tangents, and lines of See also:water birds, perhaps swans. Sometimes, however, especially in the case of large vases from the See also:cemetery at Athens, which adjoins the Dipylon See also:gate, scenes from Greek life are depicted, from daily life, not from See also:legend or divine myth. Especially scenes from the lying-in-See also:state and the See also:burial of the dead are prevalent. An excerpt from a Dipylon vase (fig. 5) shows a dead man on his See also:couch surrounded by mourners, male and female. Both sexes are apparently represented naked, and are distinguished very simply; some of them hold branches to sprinkle the See also:corpse or to keep away flies. It will be seen how See also:primitive and conventional is the drawing of this age, presenting a wonderful contrast to the free drawing and modelling of the Mycenaean age. In the same graves with the pottery are sometimes found plaques of See also:gold or bronze, and towards the end of the geometric age these somtimes See also:bear scenes from See also:mythology, treated with the greatest simplicity. Mon. d. Inst. ia. 39. For example, in the museum of Berlin are the contents of a tomb found at Corinth, consisting mainly of gold work of geometric decoration. But in the same tomb were also found gold plates or plaques of repousse work See also:hearing subjects from Greek legend. Two of these are shown in fig. 6. On one Theseus is slaying the See also:Minotaur, while See also:Ariadne stands by and encourages the hero. The tale could not have been told in a simpler or more straightforward way. On the other we have an armed See also:warrior with his charioteer in a chariot See also:drawn by two horses. The treatment of the human See also:body is here more advanced than on the vases of the Dipylon. On the site of Olympia, where Mycenaean remains are not found, but the earliest monuments show the geometric style, a quantity of dedications in bronze have been found, the decoration of which belongs to this style. Fig. 7 shows the handle of a See also:tripod from Olympia, which is adorned with geometric patterns and surmounted by the figure of a horse. It was about the 6th century that the genius of the Greeks, almost suddenly, as it seems to us, emancipated itself from the thraldom of tradition, and passed beyond the limits with which the nations of the east and west had hitherto been content, in a free and bold effort towards the ideal. Thus the 6th century marks See also:Arch. Zeit. 1884, 8. Olympia iv. 33. the stage in art in which it may be said to have become definitely Hellenic. The Greeks still borrowed many of their decorative forms, either from the prehistoric remains in their own country or, through Phoenician agency, from the old-world empires of Egypt and Babylon, but they used those forms freely to express their own meaning. And gradually, in the course of the century, we see both in the painting of vases and in sculpture a national spirit and a national style forming under the influence of Greek See also:religion and mythology, Greek athletic training, Greek worship of beauty. We must here See also:lay emphasis on the fact, which is sometimes overlooked in an age which is greatly given to the Darwinian See also:search after origins, that it is one thing to trace back to its original sources the nascent art,of Greece, and quite another thing to follow and to, understand its gradual embodiment of Hellenic ideas and civilization. The immense success with which the See also:veil has in late years been lifted from the prehistoric age of Greece, and the clearness with which we can discern the various strands See also:woven into the See also:web of Greek art, have tended to See also:fix our attention rather on what Greece possessed in See also:common with all other peoples at the same early stage of civilization than on what Greece added for herself to this common stock. In many respects the art of Greece is incomparable—one of the great inspirations which have redeemed the world from mediocrity and vulgarity. And it is the, searching out and appreciation of this unique and ideal beauty in all its phases, in See also:idea and composition and execution, which is the true task of Greek archaeological science. In very recent years it has been possible, for the first time, to trace the influence of Ionian painting, as represented by vases, on the rise of art. The discoveries at See also:Naucratis and See also:Daphnae in Egypt, due to the keenness and pertinacity of W.M.See also:Flinders See also:Petrie,threw new light on this matter. It became evident that when those cities were first inhabited by Ionian Greeks, in the 7th century, they used pottery of several distinct but allied styles, the most notable feature of which was the use of the See also:lotus in decora- tion, the presence of con-. tinuous friezes of animals and of monsters, and the filling up of the back- ground with rosettes, lozenges and other forms. Fig. 8 shows a vase found in Rhodes which illus- trates this Ionian decora- tion. The See also:sphinx, the See also:deer and the See also:swan are prominent on it, the last- named serving as a See also:link between the ' geometric ware and the more brilliant and varied ware of the Ionian cities. The See also:assignment of the many species of early Ionic ware to various Greek localities, Miletus, See also:Samos, See also:Phocaea and other cities, is a work of great difficulty, which now closely occupies the attention of archaeologists. For the results of their studies the reader is referred to two recent German works, Bohlau's Aus ionischen and italischen Nekropolen, and Endt's Beitrage zur ionischen Vasenmalerei. The feature which is most interesting in this pottery from our present point of view is the way in which representations of Greek myth and legend gradually make their way, and relegate the mere decoration of the vases to See also:borders and See also:neck. One of the earliest examples of See also:representation of a really Greek subject is the contest of See also:Menelaus and See also:Euphorbus on a plate found in Rhodes. On the vases of Melos, of the 7th century, which are, however, not Ionian, but rather Dorian in character, we have a certain number ;f mythological scenes, battles of Homeric heroes and the like. One of these is shown in fig. 9. It represents Apollo in a chariot drawn by winged horses, playing on the See also:lyre, and accompanied by a pair of See also:Muses, See also:meeting his See also:sister See also:Artemis. It is notable that Apollo is bearded, and that Artemis holds her See also:stag by the horns, much in the manner of the deities on Babylonian cylinders; in the other hand she carries an arrow; above is a line of water birds. Some sites in Asia Minor and the islands adjoining, such cities as Samos, Camirus in Rhodes, and the Ionian colonies on the Conze, Mel. Tongefasse, a. See also:Black See also:Sea, have furnished us with a See also:mass of ware of the Ionian class, but it seldom bears interesting subjects; it is essentially decorative. For Ionian ware which has closer relation to Greek mythology and history we must turn elsewhere. The cemeteries of the great See also:Etruscan cities, See also:Caere in particular, have preserved for us a large number of vases, which are now generally recognized as Ionian in design and drawing, though they may in some cases be only Italian imitations of Ionian imported ware. Thus has been filled up what was a See also:blank See also:page in the history of early Greek art. The Ionian painting is unrestrained in character, characterized by a See also:licence not See also:foreign to the nature of the race, and wants the self-control and moderation which belong to Doric art, and to See also:Attic art after the first.
Some of the most interesting examples of early Ionic painting are found on the sarcophagi of See also:Clazomenae. In that See also:city in archaic times an exceptional custom prevailed of burying the dead in great coffins of terra-cotta adorned with painted scenes from chariot-racing, See also:war and the See also:chase. The British Museum possesses some remarkable specimens, which are published in A. S. See also: Vellersfelde. See also:eagle, lions pulling down their See also:prey, and a monstrous sea-god among his fishes. This relic is the more valuable on account of the spot where it was found—Vettersfelde in See also:Brandenburg. It Ionian vases. .g@ C GCS :~~if~/iimaGU~p18utl11~0\\, s M'us. See also:Napoleon, 57. . FIG. 8.-See also:Jug from Rhodes. The fish See also:dates from the 6th century s.c. We may compare some of the gold ornaments from Camirus in Rhodes, which show an Ionian tendency, perhaps combined with Phoenician elements. On one of them (fig. 11) we see a centaur with human forelegs holding up a fawn, on the other the oriental goddess whom the Greeks identified with their Artemis, winged, and flanked by lions. This form was given to Artemis on the Corinthian See also:chest of Cypselus, a work of art preserved at Olympia, and carefully described for us by Pausanias. From Ionia the style of vase-painting which ' has been called by various names, but may best be termed the " orientaliz- See also:ing," spread to Greece proper. Its main See also:home ' here was in Corinth; and small Corinthian un- guent-vases bearing figures of swans, lions, monsters and human beings; the intervals between which are filled by rosettes, are found wherever Corinthian See also:trade penetrated, notably in the cemeteries of Sicily. For the larger Corinthian vases, which See also:bore more elaborate scenes from mythology, we must again turn to the graves of the cities of See also:Etruria. Here, besides the Ionian ware, of which mention has already been made, we find pottery of three Greek cities clearly defined, that of Corinth, that of See also:Chalcis in See also:Euboea, and that of Athens. Corinthian and Chalcidian ware is most readily distinguished by means of the alphabets used in the See also:inscriptions which have distinctive forms easily to be identified. Whether in the style of the paintings coming from the various cities any distinct See also:differences may be traced is a far more difficult question, into which we cannot now enter. The subjects are mostly from heroic legend, and are treated with great simplicity and directness. There is a manly vigour about them which distinguishes them at a glance from the laxer works of Ionian style: Fig. 12 shows a group from a Chalcidian vase, which represents the conflict Mon. d. Inst. i. 51. over the dead body of Achilles. The corpse of'the hero lies in the midst, the arrow in his See also:heel. The Trojan See also:Glaucus tries to draw away the body by means of a rope tied round the See also:ankle, but in doing so is transfixed by the See also:spear of See also:Ajax, who charges under the See also:protection of the goddess Athena. See also:Paris on the Trojan side shoots an arrow at Ajax. In fig. 13, from a Corinthian vase, Ajax falls on his See also:sword in the presence of his colleagues, See also:Odysseus and See also:Diomedes. The See also:short stature of Odysseus is a well-known Homeric feature. These vases are black-figured; the heroes are painted in See also:silhouette onthe red ground of the vases. Their names are appended in archaic Greek letters. The early history of vase-painting at Athens is complicated. It was only by degrees that the geometric style gave way to, or developed into, what is known as the black-figured Athens. style. It would seem that until the age of Peisistratus Athens was not notable in the world of art, and nothing could be ruder than some of the vases of Athens in the 7th century, Mus. Napoleon, 66. for example that here figured, on one side of which are represented the winged See also:Harpies (fig. 14) and on the other See also:Perseus accompanied by Athena flying from the pursuit of the Gorgons. This vase retains in its decoration some features of geometric style; but the lotus and rosette, the See also:lion and sphinx which appear on it, belong to the See also:wave of Ionian influence. Although it involves a departure from strict chronological order, it will be well here to follow the course of development in pottery at Athens until the end of our period. Neighbouring cities, and especially Corinth, seem to have exercised a strong influence at Athens about the Arch. Zeit. 1882, q. 7th century. We have even a class of vases called .by archaeologists Corintho-Attic. But in the course of the 6th century there is formed at Athens a distinct and marked black-figured style. The most. remarkable example of this ware is the so-called See also:Francois vase at See also:Munich, by Clitias and Ergotimus, which contains, in most careful and precise rendering, a number of scenes from Greek myth. One of these vases is dated, since it bears the name and the figure of See also:Callias in his chariot (Mon. 'dell' Inst. iii. 45), and this Callias won a victory at Olympia in 564 B.C. Fig. 15 shows the See also:reverse of a somewhat later black-figured vase of the Panathenaic class, given at Athens as a See also:prize to the winner of a See also:foot-race at the See also:Panathenaea, with the foot-race (See also:stadion) represented on it. A large number of Athenian vases of the 6th century have reached us, which bear the signatures of the potters who made, or the artists who painted them; lists of these will be found in the useful work of See also:Klein, Griechische Vasen mit Meistersignaturen. The recent excavations on the furnishes a proof that the influence and perhaps the See also:commerce of the Greek colonies on the Black Sea spread far to the north through the countries of the Scythians and other barbarians. Brit. Mus. Acropolis have proved the erroneousness of the view, strongly maintained by Brunn, that the mass of the black-figured vases were of a late and imitative fabric. We now know that, with a few exceptions, vases of this class are not later than the early part of the 5th century. The same excavations have also proved that red-figured vase-painting, that is, vase-painting in which the background was blocked out with black, and the figures left in the natural See also:colour of the vase originated at Athens in the last See also:quarter of the 6th century. We cannot here give a
t T• • 1 0• M.• o See also:don) GREEK ART
Mon. d. Inst. x. 48 m.
detailed account of the beautiful series of Athenian vases of this fabric. Many of the finest of them are in the British Museum. As an example, fig. 16 presents a group by the painter Pamphaeus, representing Heracles See also:wrestling with the river-See also:monster See also:Achelous, which belongs to the age of the Persian Wars. The clear precision of the figures, the vigour of the grouping, the correctness of the See also:anatomy and the delicacy of the lines are all marks of distinction, The student of art will perhaps find the nearest parallel to these vase-pictures in See also:Japanese drawings. The Japanese artists are very inferior to the Greek in their love and understanding of the human body, but equal them in freshness and vigour of design. At the same time began the beautiful series of See also: They are well represented in the British Museum and that of Oxford. We now return to the early years of the 6th century, and proceed to trace, by the aid of recent discoveries, the rise of architecture and sculpture. The Greek temple in its character and form gives the See also:clue to the whole character of Greek art. It is the abode of the deity, who is represented by his sacred image; and the See also:flat surfaces of the temple offer a great field to the sculptor for the depicting of sacred legend. The process of discovery has emphasized the line which divides Ionian from Dorian architecture and art. We will speak first of the templesand the sculpture of Ionia. The Ionians were a people far more susceptible than were the Dorians to oriental influences. The See also:dress, the art, the luxury of western Asia attracted them with irresistible force. We may suspect, as Brunn has suggested, that Ionian artists worked in the great Assyrian and Persian palaces, and that the reliefs which adorn the walls of those palaces were in part their handiwork. Some of the great temples of Ionia have been excavated in recent years, notably those of Apollo at Miletus, of See also:Hera at Samos, and of Artemis at Ephesus. Very little, however, of the architecture of the 6th-century temples of those sites has been recovered. Quite recently, however, the French excavators at Delphi have successfully restored the treasury of the people of Cnidus, which is quite a gem DeI ht. of Ionic style, the See also:entablature being supported in front not by pillars but by two maidens or Corae, and a frieze See also:running all round the building above. But though this building is of Treasury of Cnidus. Ionic type, it is scarcely in the technical sense of Ionic style, since the columns have not Ionic capitals, but are carved with curious reliefs. The Ionic capital proper is developed in Asia by degrees (see ARCHITECTURE and CAPITAL; also See also:Perrot and Chipiez, Hist. de fart, vii. ch. 4). The Doric temple is not wholly of See also:European origin. One of the earliest examples is the old temple of Assus in Troas. Yet it was developed mainly in Hellas and the west. The most ancient example is the Heraeum at Olympia, next to which come the fragmentary temples of Corinth and of Selinus in Sicily. With the early Doric temple we are familiar from examples which have survived in See also:fair preservation to our own days at Agrigentum in Sicily, Paestum in Italy, and other sites. Of the decorative sculpture which adorned these early temples we have more extensive remains than we have of actual construction. It will be best to speak of them under their districts. On the coast of Asia Minor, the most extensive series of archaic decorative sculptures which has come down to us is that which adorned the temple of Assus (fig. 18). These were placed in a unique position on the temple, a long frieze running along the entablature, with representations of See also:wild animals, of centaurs, of See also:Hercules seizing Achelous, and of men feasting, See also:scene succeeding scene without much order or method. The only figures from Miletus which can be considered as belonging to the original temple destroyed by See also:Darius, are the dedicated seated statues, some of which, brought away by Sir Charles Newton, are now preserved at the British Museum. At Ephesus Mr Wood has been more successful, and has recovered considerable fragments
~, ~,!~ •See also:ice ~~ ~.~~.~.f!~.~.~~~i~~~ir~M~r~1•,~!r!~i~!~~!~!~~~~~i~~ •JlalWlluufiutataaala.t...a.a•»._•.~LL2_2liplthniiuttt2
of the temple of Artemis, to which, as See also:Herodotus tells us, See also:Croesus presented many columns. The lower part of one of these columns, bearing figures in relief of early Ionian style, has been put together at the British Museum; and remains of inscriptions recording the presentation by Croesus are still to be traced. Reliefs from a cornice of somewhat later date are also to be found at the British Museum. Among the Aegean islands,
51;%/;!//i5//%.~Z2;=7~/// y///::~/ y///Li:/=:%L6//%/%";Y//60///./X55.'%///6"J%/.'h%5%/oi%//..`;;t%i2.-/,ii See also:gas;=n
Q
From Perrot and Chipiez, vu. pl. 35, by permission of See also:Chapman and See also: A great improvement on these helpless and inexpressive figures is marked by another figure found at Delos, and connected, though perhaps incorrectly, with a basis recording the execution of a statue by See also:Archermus and Micciades, two sculptors who stood, in the See also:middle of the 6th century, at the See also:head of a sculptural school at See also:Chios. The representation (fig. 19) is of a running or flying figure, having six wings, like the See also:seraphim in the See also:vision of See also:Isaiah, and clad in long drapery. It may be a statue of Nike or Victory, who is said to have been represented in winged form by Archermus. The figure, with its neatness and precision of work, its expressive See also:face and strong outlines, certainly marks great progress in the art of sculpture. When we examine the early sculpture of Athens, we find reason to think that the Chian school had great influence in that city in the days of Peisistratus. At Athens, in the age 650-480, we may trace two quite distinct periods of architecture and sculpture. In the earlier of the two periods, a rough See also:limestone was used alike for the walls AthonIan and the sculptural decoration of temples; in the 8p vture. later period it was superseded by marble, whether native or imported. Every visitor to the museum of the Athenian acropolis stands astonished at the recently recovered groups which decorated the pediments of Athenian temple Athen. See also:Mitten. x. 237. before the age of Peisistratus—groups of large size, rudely cut in soft stone, of primitive workmanship, and painted with bright red, See also:blue and See also:green, in a See also:fashion which makes no attempt to follow nature, but only to produce a vivid result. The two largest in See also:scale of these groups seem to have belonged to the pediments of the early 6th-century temple of Athena. On other smaller pediments, perhaps belonging to shrines of Heracles and See also:Dionysus, we have conflicts of Heracles with See also:Triton or with other monstrous foes. It is notable how fond the Athenian artists of this early time are of exaggerated muscles and of monstrous forms, which combine the limbs of men and of animals; the measure and moderation which mark developed Greek art are as completely absent as are skill in execution or power of grouping. Fig. 20 shows a small pediment in which appears in relief Athen. Mnttn. xxii. 3. the slaying of the Lernaean See also:hydra by Heracles. The hero strikes at the many-headed water-snake, somewhat inappropriately, with his See also:club. Iolaus, his usual See also:companion, holds the reins of the chariot which awaits Heracles after his victory. On the extreme left a huge crab comes to the aid of the hydra. There can be little doubt that Athens owed its great start in art to the influence of the See also:court of Peisistratus, at which artists of all kinds were welcome. We can trace a gradual transformation in sculpture, in which the influence of the Chian and other progressive schools of sculpture is visible, not only in the substitution of See also:island marble for native stone, but in increased See also:grace and truth to nature, in the toning down of glaring colour, and the appearance of taste in composition. A transition See also:IIII IIIII ~Ilr 111111 " ;' .x;11111 ~h~~~ ;See also:Ill !1111 j ": r~'y See also:lull` lit [ 11111.. . ~ III~If IN1 11111±1 1III ,lf~ ;.~Ly X1111 1 between the older and the newer is furnished by the well-known statue of the See also:calf-See also:bearer, an Athenian preparing to See also:sacrifice a calf to the deities, which is made of marble of See also:Hymettus, and in robust clumsiness of forms is not far removed from the See also:lime-stone pediments. The sacrificer has been commonly spoken of as Hermes or Theseus, but he seems rather to be an ordinary human votary. In the time of Peisistratus or his sons a See also:peristyle of columns was added to the old temple of Athena; and this necessitated the preparation of fresh pediments. These were of marble. In one of them was re-presented the battle between gods and giants; in the midst Athena herself striking at a prostrate foe (fig. 21). Ii these figures no eye can fail to trace remarkable progress. On about the same level of art are the charming statues dedicated to Athena, which were set up in the latter half of the 6th century in the Acropolis, whose graceful though conventional forms and delicate colouring make them one of the great attractions of the Acropolis Museum. We show a figure (fig. 22) which, if it be rightly connected with the basis on which it stands, is the work of the sculptor See also:Antenor, who was also author of a celebrated group representing the See also:tyrant-slayers, Harmodius and Aristogiton. To the same age belong many other votive reliefs of the Acropolis, representing horsemen, See also:scribes and other votaries of Athena. From Athens we pass to the seats of Dorian art. And in doing so we find a complete See also:change of character. In place of draped. goddesses and female figures, we find nude Dorian sculptutle. male forms. In Place of Ionian softness and elegance, we find hard, rigid outlines, strong See also:muscular development,. a greater love of and faithfulness to the actual human form—the influence of. the See also:palaestra rather than of the See also:harem. To the known series of archaic male figures, recent years have added many examples. We may especially mention a series of 'figures from the temple of Apollo Ptoos in Boeotia, probably representing the god himself. Still more See also:note-worthy are two See also:colossal nude figures of Apollo, remarkable both for force and for rudeness, found at Delphi, the inscriptions of which prove them to be the' work of an Argive sculptor. (Plate V. fig. 76.) From See also:Crete we have acquired the upper part of a draped figure (fig. 23), whether male or female is not certain, which should be an example of the early Daedalid school, whence the art of Peloponnesus was derived; but we can scarcely venture to treat it as a characteristic product of that school; rather the likeness to the See also:dedication of Nicandra is striking. Another. remarkable piece of Athenian sculpture, of the time of the Persian Wars, is the group of the tyrannicides Harmodiusand Aristogiton, set up by the people of Athens, and made by the sculptors See also:Critius and Nesiotes. These figures were hard and rigid in outline, but showing some progress in the treatment of the nude. Copies are preserved in the museum of See also:Naples (Plate I. fig. 5o). It should be observed that one of the heads does not belong. Next in importance to Athens, as a find-spot for works of early Greek art, ranks Olympia. Olympia, however, did not suffer like Athens from sudden violence, and the explorations there have brought to light a continuous series of remains, beginning with the bronze tripods of the geometric age already mentioned and ending at the See also:barbarian invasions of the 4th century A.D. Notable among the 6th-century stone-sculpture of Olympia are the pediment of the treasury of the people of See also:Megara, in which is represented a battle of gods and giants, and a huge rude head of Hera (fig. 24), which seems to be part of the image worshipped in the Heraeum. Its flatness and want of style are noteworthy. Among the temples of Greece proper the Heraeum of Olympia stands almost alone for antiquity and See also:interest, its chief See also:rival, besides the temples of ' Athens, being the other temple of Hera at See also:Argos. It appears to have been origin-ally constructed of wood, for which stone was by slow degrees, part by part, substituted. In the time of Pausanias one of the pillars FIG. 24.–Head of Hera: Olympia. was still of See also:oak, and at the present See also:day the varying See also:diameter of the columns and other structural irregularities hear See also:witness to the process of constant renewal which must have taken place. The early small bronzes of Olympia form an important series, figures of deities standing or striding, warriors in their See also:armour, athletes with exaggerated muscles, and women draped in the Ionian fashion, which_, did not become unpopular in Greece until after the Persian Wars. Excavations at Sparta have revealed interesting monuments belonging to the worship of ancestors, which seems in the conservative Dorian states of Greece to have been more strongly developed than elsewhere. On some of these stones, which doubt-less belonged to the See also:family cults of Sparta, we see the ancestor seated holding a See also:wine-See also:cup, accompanied by his faithful horse or See also:dog; on some we FIG. 25.–Spartan Tombstone : Berlin. see the ancestor and ancestress seated side by side (fig. 25), ready to receive the gifts of their descendants, who appear in the corner of the relief on a much smaller scale. The male figure holds a wine-cup, in allusion to the libations of wine made at the tomb. The female figure holds her veil and the See also:pomegranate, the recognized See also:food of the dead. A huge See also:serpent stands erect behind the pair. The style of these sculptures is as striking as the subjects; we see lean, rigid Olympia, Sparta, Salinas. 480—400 B.C.] forms with severe outline carved in a very See also:low relief, the surface of which is not rounded but flat. The name of Selinus in Sicily, an early Megarian See also:colony, has long been associated with some of the most curious of early sculptures, the metopes of ancient temples, representing the exploits of Heracles and of Perseus. Even more archaic metopes have in recent years been brought to light, one representing a seated sphinx, one the See also:journey of See also:Europa over the sea on the back of the amorous See also:bull (fig. 26), a pair of dolphins See also:swimming beside her. In simplicity and in rudeness of work these reliefs remind us of the limestone pediments of Athens (fig. 20), but yet they are of another and a severer style; the Ionian laxity is wanting. The recent French excavations at Delphi add a new and important chapter to the history of 6th-century art. Of three Delphi treasure-houses, those of Sicyon, Cnidus and Athens, the sculptural adornments have been in great part recovered. These sculptures form a series almost covering the century 570—470 B.C., and include representations of some myths of which we have hither- to had no example. We may say here a few words as to the sculpture which has been' dis- covered, leaving to the article DELPHI an account of the topo- graphy and the buildings of the sacred site. Of the archaic temple of Apollo, built as Hero- dotus tells us by the See also:Alcmaeonidae of Athens, the only sculptural re- mains which have come down to us are some fragments of the pedi- See also:mental figures. Of the treasuries which con- tained the offerings of See also:Palermo. most archaic of which there are remains is that belonging to the people of Sicyon. To it appertain a set of exceedingly primitive metopes. One represents See also:Idas and Dioscuri See also:driving off See also:cattle (Plate IV. fig. 66); another, the See also:ship Argo; another, Europa on the bull, others merely animals, a See also:ram or a See also:boar. The treasury of the people of Cnidus (or perhaps Siphnos) is in style some half a century later (see fig. 17). To it belongs a long frieze representing a variety of curious subjects: a battle, perhaps between Greeks481 See also:Castor and See also:Pollux; See also:Aeolus holding the winds in sacks. The Treasury of the Athenians, erected at the time of the Persian Wars, was adorned with metopes of singularly clear-cut and beautiful style, but very fragmentary, representing the deeds of Heracles and Theseus. We have yet to speak of the most interesting and important of all Greek archaic sculptures, the pediments of the temple at Aegina (q.v.). These groups of nude athletes fighting Aegina. over the corpses of their comrades are preserved at Munich, and are familiar to artists and students. But the very fruitful excavations of See also:Professor Furtwangler have put them in quite a new light. Furtwangler (Aegina: Heiligtum der Aphaia) has entirely rearranged these pediments, in a way which removes the extreme simplicity and rigour of the composition, and introduces far greater variety of attitudes and See also:motive. We repeat here these new arrangements (figs. 27 and 28), the reasons for which must be sought in Furtwangler's great publication. The individual figures are not much altered, as the restorations of See also:Thorwaldsen, even when incorrect, have now a prescriptive right of which it is not easy to deprive them. Besides the pediments of Aegina must be set the remains of the pediments of the temple of Apollo at Eretria in Euboea, the chief group of which (Plate II. fig. 58), Theseus carrying off an See also:Amazon, is one of the most finely executed works of early Greek art. Period II. 480-400 B.c.—The most marvellous phenomenon in the whole history of art is the rapid progress made by Greece in painting and sculpture during the 5th century B.C. As in literature the 5th century takes us from the rude See also:peasant plays of See also:Thespis to the drama of See also:Sophocles and See also:Euripides; as in See also:philosophy it takes us from See also:Pythagoras to See also:Socrates; so in sculpture it covers the space from the primitive works made for the Peisistratidae to some of the most perfect productions of the See also:chisel. In architecture the 5th century is ennobled by the Theseum, the Parthenon and the Erechtheum, the temples of Zeus at Olympia, of Apollo at Phigalia, and many other central shrines, as well as by the Hall of the Mystae at See also:Eleusis arcs! lecture. and the See also:Propylaea of the Acropolis. Some of the most important of the Greek temples of Italy and Sicily, such as those of See also:Segesta and Selinus, date from the same age. It is, however, only of their sculptural decorations, carried out by the greatest masters in Greece, that we need here treat in any detail. It is the rule in the history of art that innovations and technical progress are shown earlier in the case of painting than in that of sculpture, a fact easily explained by the greater ease painting. and rapidity of the See also:brush compared with the chisel. That this was the order of development in Greek art cannot be doubted. But our means for judging of the painting of the 5th century are very slight. The noble paintings of such masters from Fun,anavY Ae won See also:eA.BucW o1 pIIIA 8'm.h per, and Trojans, with gods and goddesses looking on; a gigantomachy in which the figures of See also:Poseidon, Athena, Hera, Apollo, Artemis and See also:Cybele can be made out, with their opponents, who are armed like Greek hoplites; Athena and Heracles in a chariot; the carrying off of the daughters of Leucippus by xII. 16FIG. 28.-Restoration of East Pediment, Aegina. as See also:Polygnotus, See also:Micon and See also:Panaenus, which once adorned the walls of the great porticoes of Athens and Delphi, have disappeared. There remain only the designs drawn rather than painted on the beautiful vases of the age, which in some degree help us to realize, not the colouring or the charm of contemporary paintings, but the principle of their composition and the accuracy of their drawing. Polygnotus of See also:Thasos was regarded by his compatriots as a great ethical painter. His colouring and composition were alike very simple, his figures quiet and statuesque, his drawing careful and precise. He won his fame largely by incorporating in his works the best current ideas as to mythology, religion and morals. In particular his painting of Hades with its rewards and punish- From Monumenli deli' Inslilulo di Correspondenza archeologica, xi. 40. ments, which was on the walls of the building of the people of Cnidus at Delphi, might be considered as a great religious work, parallel to the paintings of the Campo Santo at See also:Pisa or to the painted windows of such churches as that at Fairford. But he also introduced improvements in perspective and greater freedom in grouping. It is fortunate for us that the Greek traveller Pausanias has left us very careful and detailed descriptions of some of the most important of the frescoes of Polygnotus, notably of the Taking of See also:Troy and the Visit to Hades, which were at Delphi. A comparison of these descriptions with vase paintings of the middle of the 5th century has enabled us to discern with great See also:probability the principles of Polygnotan drawing and perspective. Professor See also:Robert has even ventured to restore the paintings on the evidence of vases. We here represent one of the scenes depicted on a vase found at See also:Orvieto (fig. 29), which is certainly Polygnotan in character. It represents the slaying of the children of See also:Niobe by Apollo and Artemis. Here we may observe a remarkable perspective. The different heights of the rocky back-ground are represented by lines traversing the picture on which the figures stand; but the more distant figures are no smaller than the nearer. The forests of See also:Mount Sipylus are repre- sented by a single conventional tree. The figures are beautifully drawn, and full of charm; but there is a want of See also:energy in the See also:action. There can be little doubt that the school of Polygnotus exercised great influence on contemporary sculpture. Panaenus, See also:brother of Pheidias, worked with Polygnotus, and many of the groupings found in the sculptures of the Parthenon remind us of those usual with the Thasian See also:master. At this simple and early stage of art there was no essential difference between See also:fresco-painting and coloured relief, light and shade and aerial perspective being unknown. We reproduce two vase-paintings, one (fig. 30) a group of man and horse which closely resembles figures in the Panathenaic frieze of the Parthenon (fig. 31); the other (fig. 32) representing Victory pouring water for a sacrificial ox to drink, which reminds us of the See also:balustrade of the shrine of Wingless Victory at Athens. Most writers on Greek painting have supposed that after the middle of the 5th century the technique of painting rapidly improved. This may well have been the case; but we have little means of testing the question. Such improvements would soon raise such a barrier between fresco-painting and vase-painting,—which by its very nature must be simple and architect- onic,—that vases can no longer be used with confidence as evidence for contemporary painting. The stories told us by Pliny of the lives of Greek painters are mostly of a trivial and untrustworthy character. Some of them are mentioned in this See also:Encyclopaedia under the names of individual artists. We can only discern a few general facts. Of See also:Agatharchus of Athens we learn that he painted, under compulsion, the interior of the See also:house of See also:Alcibiades. And we are told that he painted a scene for the tragedies of See also:Aeschylus or Sophocles. This has led some writers to suppose that he attempted illusive landscape; but this is contrary to the possibilities of the time; and it is fairly certain that what he really did was to paint the wooden front of the stage building in See also:imitation of architecture; in fact he painted a permanent architectural background, and not one suited to any particular play. Of other painters who flourished at the end of the century, such as Zeuxis and See also:Aristides, it will be best to speak under the next period. It is now generally held, in consequence of evidence furnished by tombs, that the 5th century saw the end of the making of From See also:Gerhard's Auserlesene Vasenbilder, vases on a great scale at Athens for export to Italy and Sicily. And in fact few things in the history of art are more remarkable than the rapidity with which vase-painting at Athens reached its highest point and passed it on the downward road. At the beginning of the century black-figured ware was scarcely out of fashion, and the masters of the severe red-figured style, Pamphaeus, Epictetus and their contemporaries, were in See also:vogue. 1111ILIIIlll1(11111(11Ilitll_(tllII11_1.111111111flI(JIJ(1(~1JU11(il1(1111ltI(llI llIIllII_uI 11I1I A A U. Arch. Zeit. 1878, pl. 22. Drawing The schools of See also:Euphronius, See also:Hiero and See also:Duris belong to the age of the Persian wars. With the middle of the century the works of these makers are succeeded by unsigned vases of most beautiful design, some of them showing the influence of Polygnotus. In the later years of the century, when the empire of Athens was approaching its fall, drawing becomes laxer and more careless, and in the treatment of drapery we frequently note the over-elaboration of folds, the want of simplicity, which begin to mark contemporary sculpture. These changes of style can only be stood Zeus the supreme arbiter. On one side of him stood Oenomaus with his wife Sterope, on the other Pelops and Hippodameia, the daughter of Oenomaus, whose position at once indicates that she is on the side of the newcomer, whatever her parents may feel. Next on either side are the four-horse chariots of the two competitors, that of Oenomaus in the See also:charge of his perfidious See also:groom Myrtilus, who contrived that it should break down in the running, that of Pelops tended by his grooms. At either end, where the pediment narrows to a point, reclines a satisfactorily followed in the vase rooms of the British Museum, or other treasuries of Greek art (see also A. B. Walters, History of Ancient Pottery; and the article CERAMICS). Among the sculptural works of this period the first place may be given to the great temple of Zeus at Olympia. The statue by Pheidias which once occupied the place of honour in ~o~tdot that temple, and was regarded as the noblest monu-Zeus. ment of Greek religion, has of course disappeared, nor are we able with confidence to restore it. But the plan of the temple, its See also:pavement, some of its architectural ornaments, remain. The marbles which occupied the pediments and the metopes of the temple have been in large part recovered, having been probably thrown down by earthquakes and gradually buried in the alluvial Broil. The utmost ingenuity and science of the archaeologists of Germany have been employed in the recovery of the composition of these groups; and although doubt remains as to the places of some figures, and their precise attitudes, yet we may fairly say that we know more about the sculpture ofriver god, at one end Alpheus, the chief stream of Olympia, at the other end his tributary Cladeus. Only one figure remains, not noticed in the careful description of Pausanias, the figure of a handmaid kneeling, perhaps one of the attendants of Sterope. Our engraving gives two conjectural restorations of the pediment, that of Treu and that of See also:Kekule, which differ principally in the arrangement of the corners of the composition; the position of the central figures and of the chariots can scarcely be called in question. The moment chosen is one, not of action, but of expectancy, perhaps of preparation for sacrifice. The arrangement is undeniably stiff and formal, and in the figures we note none of the trained perfection of style which belongs to the sculptures of the Parthenon, an almost contemporary temple. Faults abound, alike in the rendering of drapery and in the representation of the human forms, and the sculptor has evidently trusted to the painter who was afterwards to colour his work, to remedy some of his clumsiness, or to make clear the ambiguous. Nevertheless there is in the whole a dignity, a the Olympian temple of Zeus than about the sculpture of any other great Greek temple. The exact date of these sculptures is not certain, but we may with some confidence give them to 470-460 B.C. (In speaking of them we shall mostly follow the See also:opinion of Dr Treu, whose masterly work in vol. iii. of the great German publication on Olympia is a See also:model of See also:patience and of science.) In the eastern pediment (fig. 33), as Pausanias tells us, were represented the preparations for the chariot-race between Oenomaus and Pelops, the result of which was to determine whether Pelops should find See also:death or a See also:bride and a See also:kingdom. In the midst, invisible to the contending heroes, sobriety, and a simplicity, which reconcile us to the knowledge that this pediment was certainly regarded in antiquity as a noble work, See also:fit to adorn even the See also:palace of Zeus. In the other, the western pediment (fig. 34), the subject is the See also:riot of the Centaurs when they attended the See also:wedding of Peirithous in Thessaly, and, attempting to carry off the bride and her comrades, were slain by Peirithous and Theseus. In the midst of the pediment, invisible like Zeus in the eastern pediment, stands Apollo, while on either side of him Theseus and Peirithous attack the Centaurs with weapons hastily snatched. Our illustration gives two possible arrangements. The monsters are in various attitudes of attempted violence, of combat and defeat; with each grapples one of the Lapith heroes in the endeavour to rob them of their prey. In the corners of the pediment recline female figures, perhaps attendant slaves, though the farthest pair may best be identified as See also:local Thessalian nymphs, looking on with the calmness of divine superiority, yet not wholly unconcerned in what is going forward. Though the composition of the two pediments differs notably, the one bearing the impress of a See also:parade-like repose, the other of an overstrained activity, yet Olympia, 45. the style and execution are the same in both, and the short-comings must be attributed to the inferior skill of a local school of sculptors compared with those of Athens or of Aegina. It even appears likely that the designs also belong to a local school. Pausanias, it is true, tells us that the pediments were the work of See also:Alcamenes, the See also:pupil of Pheidias, and of See also:Paeonius, a sculptor of See also:Thrace, respectively; but it is almost certain that he was misled by the local guides, who would naturally be anxious to connect the sculptures of their great temple with well- known names. The metopes of the temple are in the same style of art as the pediments, but the defects of awkwardness and want of mastery are less conspicuous, because the narrow limits of the metope exclude any elaborate grouping. The subjects are provided- by the twelve labours of Heracles; the figures introduced in each metope are but two or at most three; and the action is simplified as much as possible. The example shown (fig. 35) represents sky on a See also:cushion, with the friendly aid of a Hesperid nymph, while See also:Atlas, whom he has' relieved of his usual See also:burden, approaches bringing the apples ' which it was the task of Heracles to procure. Another of the fruits of the excavations of Olympia is the floating Victory by Paeonius, unfortunately faceless (fig. 36), which was set up in all probability in memory of the victory of the.Athenians and their Messenian See also:allies at Sphacteria in 425 B.C. The inscription states that it was dedicated by the Messeniansand people of See also:Naupactus from the spoils of their enemies, but the name of the enemy is not mentioned in the inscription. The statue of Paeonius, which comes floating down through the air with drapery See also:borne- backward, is of a bold and innovating type, and we may trace its influence in many works of the next age. Among the discoveries at Delphi none is so striking and valuable to us as the life-size statue in bronze of a charioteer holding in his hand the reins. This is maintained De/phk by M. Homolle to be part of a chariot-group set up charioteer. by Polyzalus, brother of See also:Gelo and Hiero of See also:Syracuse, in honour of a victory won in the chariot-race at the Pythian games at Delphi (fig. 37). The charioteer is evidently a high-See also:born youth, and is clad in the long See also:chiton which was necessary to protect a See also:driver of a chariot from the See also:rush of air. The date would be about 480-470 B.C. Bronze groups representing victorious chariots with their drivers were among the noblest and most costly dedications of antiquity; the present figure is our only satisfactory representative of them. In style the figure is very notable, tall and slight beyond all contemporary examples. The contrast between the conventional decorousness of face and drapery and the lifelike accuracy of hands and Memoires, Piot, 1857, 16. Fro. 37.-Bronze Charioteer: Delphi. feet is very striking, and indicates the clashing of various tendencies in art at the time when the great style was formed in Greece. The three great masters of the 5th century, See also:Myron, Pheidias and See also:Polyclitus are all in some degree known to us from their works. Of Myron we have copies of two works, the See also:Marsyas (Plate III. fig. 64) and the Discobolus. The Marsyas (a copy in the Lateran Museum) represents the Satyr so named in the grasp of conflicting emotions, eager to pick up the flutes which Athena has thrown down, but at the same time dreading her displeasure if he does so. The Discobolus has usually been judged from the examples in the Vatican and the British Museum, in which the anatomy is modernized and the head wrongly put on. We have now photographs of the very superior replica in the Lancelotti See also:gallery at Rome, the pose of which is much nearer to the original. Our illustration represents a restoration made at Munich, by combining the Lancelotti head with the Vatican body (Plate IV. fig. 68). Of the works of Pheidias we have unfortunately no 'certain copy, if we except the small replicas at Athens of his Athena Parthenos. The larger of these (fig.. 38) was found in 188o: it is very clumsy, and the wretched device by which a pillar is introduced to support the Victory in the hand of Athena can scarcely be supposed to have belonged to the great original. Tempting theories have been published by Furtwangler (Master-pieces of Greek Sculpture) and other archaeologists, which identify copies of the Athena Lemnia of Pheidias, his Pantarces, Olympia, iii. 48. his See also:Aphrodite Urania and other statues; but doubt hangs over all these attributions. A more pertinent and more promising question is, how far we may take the decorative sculpture of the Parthenon, since Lord Elgin's time the See also:pride of the British Museum, as the actual work of Pheidias, or as done from his designs. Here again we have no conclusive evidence; but it appears from the testimony of inscriptions that the pediments at all events were not executed until after Pheidias's death. Of course the pediments and frieze of the Parthenon (q.v), whose work soever they may be, stand at the head of all Greek decorative sculpture. Whether we regard the grace of the composition, the exquisite finish of the statues in the round, or the delightful See also:atmosphere of poetry and religion which surrounds these sculptures, they See also:rank among the masterpieces of the world. The Greeks esteemed them far below the statue which the temple was made to shelter; but to us, who have lost the great figure in See also:ivory and gold, the carvings of the See also:casket which once contained it are a perpetual source of instruction and delight. The whole is repro- in A. S. Murray's Sculptures of the Parthenon. An abundant literature has sprung up in regard to these sculptures in recent years. It will suffice here to mention the discussions in Furtwangler's Masterpieces, and the very ingenious attempts of Sauer to determine by a careful examination of the bases and backgrounds of the pediments as they now stand how the figures must have been arranged in them. The two ends of the eastern pediment (Plate III. fig. 65) are the only fairly well-preserved part of the pediments. Among the pupils of Pheidias who may naturally be supposed to have worked on the sculptures of the Parthenon, the most notable were Alcamenes and See also:Agoracritus. Some fragments remain of the great statue of See also:Nemesis at Rhamnus by Agoracritus. And an interesting light has been thrown on Alcamenes by the discovery at Pergamum of a professed copy of his Hermes set up at the entrance to the Acropolis at Athens (Plate II. fig. J7). The style of this work, however, is conventional and archaistic, and we can scarcely regard it as typical of the master. Another noted contemporary who was celebrated mainly for his portraits was See also:Cresilas, a Cretan. Several copies of his portrait of See also:Pericles exist, and testify to the lofty and idealizing style of portraiture in this great age. We possess also admirable sculpture belonging to the other important temples of the Acropolis, the Erechtheum and the temple of Nike. The temple of Nike is the earlier, being possibly a memorial of the Spartan defeat at Sphacteria. The Erechtheum belongs to the end of our period, and embodies the delicacy and finish of the conservative school of sculpture at Athens just as the Parthenon illustrates the ideas of the more progressive school. The reconstruction of the Erechtheum has been a task which has long occupied the attention of archaeologists (see the See also:paper by Mr See also:Stevens in the See also:American Journal of Archaeology, r906). Our illustration (Plate V. fig. 75) shows one of the Corae or maidens who support the entablature of the See also:south porch of the Erechtheum in her proper setting. This use of the female figure in place of a pillar is based on old Ionianprecedent (see fig. 17) and is not altogether happy; but the idea is carried out with remarkable skill, the perfect repose and solid strength of the See also:maiden being emphasized. Beside Pheidias of Athens must be placed the greatest of early Argive sculptors, Polyclitus. His two typical athletes, the Doryphorus or spear-bearer (Plate VI. fig. 8o) and the Diadumenus, have long been identified, and though the copies are not first-rate, they enable us to recover the principles of the master's art. Among the bases discovered at Olympia, whence the statues had been removed, are three or four which bear the name of Polyclitus, and the definite evidence furnished by poi utos these bases as to the position of the feet of the statues which they once bore has enabled archaeologists, especially Professor Furtwangler, to identify copies of those statues among known works. Also newly discovered copies of Polyclitan works have made their appearance. At Delos there has been found a copy of the Diadumenus, which is of much finer work than the statue in the British Museum from See also:Vaison. The Museum of Fine Arts at See also:Boston, U.S.A., has secured a very beautiful statue of a young Hermes, who but for the wings on the temples might pass as a boy See also:athlete of Polyclitan style (Plate II. fig. 6o). In fact, instead of relying as regards the manner of Polyclitus on Roman copies of the Doryphorus and Diadumenus, we have quite a gallery of athletes, boys and men. who all claim relationship, nearer or more remote, to the school of the great Argive master. It might have been hoped that the excavations, made under the leadership of Professor Waldstein at the Argive Heraeum, would have enlightened us as to the style of Polyclitus. Just as the sculptures of the Parthenon are the best monument of Pheidias, so it might seem likely that the sculptural decoration of the great temple which contained the Hera of Polyclitus would show us at large how his school worked in marble. Unfortunately the fragments of sculpture from the Heraeum are few The most remarkable is a female head, which may perhaps come from a pediment (fig. 39). But archaeologists are not in agreement whether it is in style Poly- clitan or whether it rather resembles in style Attic works. Other heads and some highly-finished fragments of bodies come apparently from the metopes of the same temple. (See also article ARGOS.) Another work of Polyclitus was his Amazon, made it is said in competition with his great contemporaries, Pheidias, Cresilas and Phradmon, all of whose See also:Amazons were preserved in the great temple of Artemis at Ephesus. In our museums are many statues of Amazons representing 5th century originals. These have usually been largely restored, and it is no easy matter to I discover their original type. Professor See also:Michaelis has recovered successfully three types (fig. 40). The attribution of these is a matter of controversy. The first has been given to the chisel of Polyclitus; the second seems to represent the Wounded Amazon of Cresilas; the third has by some archaeologists been given to Pheidias. It does not represent a wounded amazon, but one alert, about to leap upon her horse with the help of a spear as a leaping See also:pole. We can devote little more than a passing mention to the sculpture of other temples and shrines of the later 5th century, which nevertheless deserve careful study. The frieze from the temple of Apollo at Phigalia, representing Centaur and Amazon battles, is familiar to visitors of the British Museum, where, however, its proximity to the remains of the Parthenon See also:lays stress upon the faults of grouping and execution which this frieze presents. It seems to have been executed by local Arcadian artists. More pleasing is the sculpture of the Ionic tomb called the Nereid monument, brought by Sir Charles Fellows from Lycia. Here we have not only a series of bands of relief which ran round the tomb, but also detached female figures, whence the name which it bears is derived. A recent view sees in these women with their fluttering drapery not nymphs of the sea, but personifications of sea-breezes. The series of known Lycian tombs has been in recent years enriched through the acquisition by the museum of See also:Vienna of the sculptured friezes which adorned a heroon near Geul Bashi. In the midst of the enclosure was a tomb, and the walls of the enclosure itself were adorned within and without with a great series of reliefs, mostly of mythologic purport. Many subjects which but rarely occur in early Greek art, the See also:siege of Troy, the See also:adventure of the Seven against See also:Thebes, the carrying off of the daughters of Leucippus, Ulysses See also:shooting down the Suitors, are here represented in detail. Professor Benndorf, who has published these sculptures in an admirable volume, is disposed to see in them the influence of the Thasian painter Polygnotus. Any one can see their kinship to painting, and their subjects recur in some of the great frescoes painted by Polygnotus, Micon and others for the Athenians. Like other Lycian sculptures, they contain non-Hellenic elements; in fact Lycia forms a link of the See also:chain which extends from the wall-paintings of Assyria to works like the columns of See also:Trajan and of See also:Antoninus, but is not embodied in the more purely idealistic works of the highest Greek art. The date of the Vienna tomb is not much later than the middle of the 5th century. A small part of the frieze of this monument is shown in fig. 41. It will be seen that in this fragment there are two scenes, one directly above the other. In the upper line Ulysses, accompanied by his son See also:Telemachus, is in the See also:act of shooting the suitors, who are reclining at table in the midst of a feast; a cup-bearer, possibly See also:Melanthius, is escaping by a See also:door behind Ulysses. In the lower line is the central group of a frieze which represents the hunting of the Calydonian boar, which is represented, as is usual in the best time of Greek art, as an ordinary animal and no monster. Archaeologists have recently begun to pay more attention to an interesting branch of Greek art which had until recently been neglected, that of sculptured portraits. The portraits. known portraits of the 5th century now include Pericles, Herodotus, See also:Thucydides, See also:Anacreon, Sophocles, Euripides, Socrates and others. As might be expected in a time when style in sculpture was so strongly pronounced, these portraits, when not later unfaithful copies, are notably ideal. They represent the great men whom they portray not in the spirit of See also:realism. Details are neglected, expression is not elaborated; the sculptor tries to represent what is permanent in his subject rather than what is temporary. Hence these portraits do not seem to belong to a particular time of life; they only represent a man in the perfection of physical force and mental energy. And the race or type is clearly shown through individual traits. In some cases it is still disputed whether statues of this age represent deities or mortals, so notable are the repose and dignity which even human figures acquire under the hands of 5th-century masters. The Pericles after Cresilas in the British Museum, and the athlete-portraits of Polyclitus, are See also:good examples. Period III. 400–300 B.C.-The high ideal level attained by Greek art at the end of the 5th century is maintained in the 4th. There cannot be any question of decay in it save at Athens, where undoubtedly the loss of religion and the decrease of national prosperity acted prejudicially. But in Peloponnesus the time was one of expansion; several new and important cities, such as See also:Messene, See also:Megalopolis and Mantinea, arose under the protection of See also:Epaminondas. And in Asia the Greek cities were still prosperous and artistic, as were the cities of Italy and Sicily which kept their See also:independence. On the whole we find during this age some diminution of the freshness and simplicity of art; Heroon of Gyeul Bashi Trysa. PI. 7. it works less in the service of the gods and more in that of private patrons; it becomes less ethical and more sentimental and emotional. On the other hand, there can be no doubt that technique both in painting and sculpture advanced with rapid strides; artists had a greater mastery of their materials, and ventured on a wider range of subject. In the 4th century no new temples of importance See also:rose at Athens; the Acropolis had taken its final form; but at Messene, Tegea, Epidaurus and elsewhere, very admirable buildings arose. The remains of the temple at Tegea are of wonderful beauty and finish; as are those of the theatre and the so-called Tholus of Epidaurus. In Asia Minor vast temples of the Ionic order arose, especially at Miletus and Ephesus. The colossal pillars of Miletus astonish the visitors to the Louvre; while the sculptured columns of Ephesus in the British Museum (Plate II. fig. 59) show a high level of artistic skill. The Mausoleum erected about 350 B.C. at Halicarnassus in memory of See also:Mausolus, See also: Another architectural work of the 4th century, in its way a gem, is the structure set up at Athens by Lysicrates, in memory of a choragic victory. This still survives, though the reliefs with which it is adorned have suffered severely from the See also:weather.
The 4th century is the brilliant period of ancient painting. It opens with the painters of the See also:Asiatic School, Zeuxis and See also:Parrhasius and See also:Protogenes, with their contemporaries See also:Nicias and See also:Apollodorus of Athens, See also:Timanthes of Sicyon or Cythnus, and
Nat. Mus., Naples.
See also:Euphranor of Corinth. It witnesses the rise of a great school at Sicyon, under See also:Eupompus and See also:Pamphilus, which was noted for its scientific character and the fineness of its drawing, and which culminated in Apelles, the painter of See also: But very few actual paintings of the age survive, and even these fragmentary remains have with time lost the freshness of their colouring; nor are they in any case the work of a note-worthy hand. We reproduce two examples. The first is from a stone of the vault of a See also:Crimean See also:grave (Plate IV. fig. 67). The date of the grave is fixed to the 4th century by ornaments found in it, among which was a gold coin of Alexander the Great. Therepresentation is probably of Demeter or her priestess, her See also:hair bound with poppies and other See also:flowers. The original is of large size. The other illustration (fig. 42) represents the remains of a drawing on marble, representing a group of women playing See also:knucklebones. It was found at Herculaneum. Though signed by one Alexander of Athens, who was probably a worker of the Roman age, Professor Robert is right in maintaining that Alexander only copied a design of the age of Zeuxis and Parrhasius. In fact the drawing and grouping is so closely like that of reliefs of about 400 B.C. that the drawing is of great historic value, though there be no colouring. Several other drawings of the same class have been found at Herculaneum, and on the walls of the Transtiberine See also:Villa at Rome (now in the Terme Museum). Until about the year 1880, our knowledge of the great Greek sculptors of the 4th century was derived mostly from the statements of ancient writers and from Roman copies, or what were supposed to be copies, of their works. We are now in a far more satisfactory position. We now possess an original work of Praxiteles, and sculptures executed under the immediate direction of, if not from the hand of, other great sculptors of that age—Scopas, Timotheus and others. Among all the discoveries made at Olympia, none has become so familiar to the artistic world as that of the Hermes of Praxiteles. It is the first time that we have become possessed of a first-rate Greek original by one of the greatest of sculptors. Hitherto almost all the statues in our museums have been either late copies of Greek works of art, or else the mere decorative sculpture of temples and tombs, which was by the ancients themselves but little regarded. But we can venture without misgiving to submit the new Hermes to the strictest examination, sure that in every line and See also:touch we have the work of a great artist. This is more than we can say of any of the literary remains of antiquity—poem, play or oration. Hermes is represented by the sculptor (fig. 43 and Plate VI. fig. 82) in the act of carrying the young See also:child Dionysus to the nymphs who were charged with his rearing. On the journey he pauses and amuses himself by holding out to the child-god a bunch of grapes, and watching his eagerness to grasp them. To the modern eye the child is not a success; only the latest art of Greece is at home in dealing with children. But the Hermes, strong without excessive muscular development, and graceful without leanness, is a model of physical formation, and his face expresses the perfection of See also:health, natural endowment and sweet nature. The statue can scarcely be called a work of religious art in the modern or Christian sense of the word Olympia, iii. 53. religious, but from the Greek Fm. 43.-Hermes of Praxiteles; point of view it is religious, as restored. embodying the result of the har- monious development of all human faculties and life in accordance with nature. The Hermes not only adds to our knowledge of Praxiteles, but also confirms the received views in regard to him. Already many works in galleries of sculpture had been identified as copies of statues of his school. Noteworthy among these are, the group at Munich representing See also:Peace See also:nursing the See also:infant Wealth, from an original by See also:Cephisodotus, See also:father of Praxiteles; copies of the Cnidian Aphrodite of Praxiteles, especially one in the Vatican which is here illustrated (Plate V. fig. 71); copies of the Apollo slaying a See also:lizard (Sauroctonus), of a Satyr (in the Capitol Museum), and others. These works, which are noted Praxiteles. for their softness and charm, make us understand the saying of ancient critics that Praxiteles and Scopas were noted for the pathos of their works, as Pheidias and Polyclitus for the ethical quality of those they produced. But the pathos of Praxiteles is of a soft and dreamy character; there is no action, or next to none; and the emotions which he rouses are sentimental rather than passionate. Scopas, as we shall see, was of another See also:mood. The discovery of the Hermes has naturally set archaeologists searching in the museums of Europe for other works which may from their likeness to it in various respects be set down as Praxitelean in character. In the case of many of the great sculptors of Greece—See also:Strongylion, See also:Silanion, See also:Calamis and others—it is of little use to search for copies of their works, since we have little really trustworthy evidence on which to base our inquiries. But in the case of Praxiteles we really stand on a safe level. Naturally it is impossible in these pages to give any sketch of the results, some almost certain, some very doubtful, of the researches of archaeologists in quest of Praxitelean works. But we may mention a few works which have been claimed by good See also:judges as coming from the master himself. Professor Brunn claimed as work of Praxiteles a torso of a satyr in the Louvre, in scheme identical with the well-known satyr of the Capitol. Professor Furtwangler puts in the same See also:category a delicately beautiful head of Aphrodite at Petworth, And his translator, Mrs Strong, regards the See also:Aberdeen head of a young man in the British Museum as the actual work of Praxiteles. Certainly this last head does not suffer when placed beside the Olympian head of Hermes. At Mantinea has been found a basis whereon stood a group of See also:Latona and her two children, Apollo and Artemis, made by Praxiteles. This base bears reliefs representing the musical contest of Apollo and Marsyas, with the Muses as spectators, reliefs very pleasing in style, and quite in the manner of Attic artists of the 4th century. But of course we must not ascribe them to the hand of Praxiteles himself; great sculptors did not themselves execute the reliefs which adorned temples and other monuments, but reserved them for their pupils. Yet the graceful figures of the Muses of Mantinea suggest how much was due to Praxiteles in determining the See also:tone and character of Athenian art in relief in the 4th century. Exactly the same style which marks them belongs also to a mass of sepulchral monuments at Athens, and such works as the Sidonian See also:sarcophagus of the See also:Mourning Women, to be presently mentioned.
Excavation on the site of the temple of Athena Alea at Tegea
has resulted in the recovery of works of the school of Scopas.
Pausanias tells us that Scopas was the architect of
Scopes.
the temple, and so important in the case of a Greek temple is the sculptural decoration, that we can scarcely doubt that the sculpture also of the temple at Tegea was under the supervision of Scopas, especially as he was more noted as a sculptor than as an architect. In the pediments of the temple were represented two scenes from mythology, the hunting of the Calydonian boar and the combat between Achilles and Telephus. To one or other of these scenes belong several heads of local marble discovered on the spot, which are very striking from .their extraordinary life and animation. Unfortunately they are so much injured that they can scarcely be made intelligible except by the help of restoration; we therefore engrave one of them, the helmeted head, as restored by a German sculptor (Plate III. fig. 63). The strong bony frame of this head,, and its See also:depth from front to back, are not less noteworthy than the parted lips and deeply set and strongly shaded eye; the latter features impart to the head a vividness of expression such as we have found in no previous work of Greek art, but which sets the See also: A draped torso of See also:Atalanta from the same pediment has been fitted to one of these heads. Hitherto Scopas was known to us, setting aside literary records, only as one of the sculptors who had worked at the Mausoleum. Ancient critics and travellers, however, bear ample testimony to his fame, and the wide range of his activity, which extended to northern Greece, Peloponnese and Asia Minor. His Maenadsand his Tritons and other beings of the sea were much copied in antiquity. But perhaps he reached his highest level in statues such as that of Apollo as See also:leader of the Muses, clad in long drapery. The interesting See also:precinct of See also:Aesculapius at Epidaurus has furnished us with specimens of the style of an Athenian con-temporary of Scopas, who worked with him on the Mausoleum. An inscription which records the sums Timotheus, spent on the temple of the Physician-god, informs usBryx;, Leochares. that the models for the sculptures of the pediments, and one set of acroteria or roof adornments, were the work of Timotheus. Of the pedimental figures and the acroteria considerable fragments have been recovered, and we may with confidence assume that at all events the models for these were by Timotheus. It is. See also:strange that the unsatisfactory arrangement whereby a noted sculptor makes models and some local workman the figures enlarged from those models, should have been tolerated by so artistic a people as the Greeks. The subjects of the pediments appear to have been the common ones of battles between Greek and Amazon and between Lapith and Centaur. We possess fragments of some of the Amazon figures, one of which, striking downwards at the enemy, is here shown (fig. 44). Their attitudes are vigorous and alert; but the work shows no delicacy of detail. Figures of Nereids See also:riding on horses, which were found on the same site, may very probably be roof ornaments (acroteria) of the temple. We have also several figures of Victory, which probably were acroteria on some smaller temple, perhaps that of Artemis. A base found at Athens, sculptured with figures of horse-men in relief, bears the name of Bryaxis, and was probably made by a pupil of his. Probable conjecture assigns to Leochares the originals copied in the Ganymede of the Vatican, borne aloft by an eagle (Plate I. fig. 53) and the noble statue of Alexander the Great at Munich (see LEOCHARES). Thus we may fairly say that we are now acquainted with the work of all the great sculptors who worked on the Mausoleum—Scopas, Bryaxis, Leochares and Timotheus; and are in a far more advantageous position than were the archaeologists of 188o for determining the artistic problems connected with that noblest of ancient tombs. Contemporary with the Athenian school of Praxiteles and Scopas was the great school of Argos and Sicyon, of which See also:Lysippus was the most distinguished member. Lysippus continued the See also:academic traditions of Polyclitus, but he was far bolder in his choice of subjects and more innovating in style. Gods, heroes and mortals alike found in him a sculptor who knew how to combine fine ideality with a vigorous actuality. He was at the height of his fame during Alexander's life, and the grandiose ambition of the great Macedonian found him ample employment, especially in the frequent representation of himself and his marshals. We have none of the actual works of Lysippus; but our best evidence for his style will be found in the statue of Agias an athlete (Plate V. fig. 74) found at Delphi, and shown by an inscription to be a marble copy of a bronze original by Lysippus. The Apoxyomenus of the Vatican (man scraping himself with a strigil) (Plate VI. fig. 79) has hitherto been regarded as a copy from Lysippus; but of this there is no evidence, and the style of that statue belongs rather to the 3rd century than the 4th. The Agias, on the other hand, is in style contemporary with the works of 4th-century sculptors. Of the elaborate groups of combatants with which Lysippus enriched such centres as Olympia and Delphi, or of the huge bronze statues which he erected in temples and shrines, we can form no adequate notion. Perhaps among the extant heads of Alexander the one which is most likely to preserve the style of Lysippus is the head from See also:Alexandria in the British Museum (Plate II. fig. 56), though this was executed at a later time. Many noted extant statues may be attributed with probability to the latter part of the 4th or the earlier part of the 3rd century. We will mention a few only. The celebrated group at See also:Florence representing Niobe and her children falling before the arrows of Apollo and Artemis is certainly a work of the pathetic school, and may be by a pupil of Praxiteles. Niobe, in an agony of grief, which is in the marble tempered and idealized, tries to protect her youngest daughter from destruction (Plate VI. fig. 78). Whether the group can have originally been fitted into the gable of a temple is a matter of dispute. Two great works preserved in the Louvre are so noted that it is but necessary to mention them, the Aphrodite of Melos (Plate VI. fig. 77), in which archaeologists are now disposed to see the influence of Scopas, and the Victory of See also:Samothrace (Plate III. figs. 61 and 62), an original set up by See also:Demetrius Poliorcetes after a See also:naval victory won at See also:Salamis in See also:Cyprus in 306 B.C. over the See also:fleet of See also:Ptolemy, king of Egypt. Nor can we pass over without notice two works so celebrated as the Apollo of the See also:Belvidere in the Vatican (Plate II. fig. 55), and the Artemis of See also:Versailles. The Apollo is now by most archaeologists regarded as probably a copy of a work of Leochares, to whose Ganymede it bears a superficial resemblance. The Artemis is regarded as possibly due to some artist of the same age. But it is by no means clear that we have the right to remove either of .these figures from among the statues of the Hellenistic age. The old theory of See also:Preller, which saw in them copies from a trophy set up to commemorate the repulse of the Gauls at Delphi in 278 B.C., has not lost its plausibility. This may be the most appropriate place for mentioning the remarkable find made at Sidon in 1886 of a number of sarcophagi, which once doubtless contained the remains of kings panto- of Sidon. They are now in the museum of Constanti- phagi of Sidon. nople, and are admirably published by Hamdy See also:Bey and T. See also:Reinach (Une Necropole royale a Sidon, 1892– 180). The sarcophagi in date See also:cover a considerable period. The earlier are made on See also:Egyptian models, the covers shaped roughly in the form of a human body or See also:mummy. The later, however, are Greek in form, and are clearly the work of skilled Greek sculptors, who seem to have been employed by the grandees of See also:Phoenicia in the adornment of their last resting-places. Four of these sarcophagi in See also:par- ticular claim attention, and in fact present us with examples of Greek art of the 5th and 4th centuries in several of its aspects. To the 5th century belong the tomb of the See also:Satrap, the reliefs of which bring before us the activities and glories of some unknown king, and, Hamdy et Reinach, Necropole a Sidon, Pl. 7. the Lycian sarcophagus, Sidon. which resembles that of tombs found in Lycia, and which is also adorned with reliefs which have reference to the past deeds of the hero buried in the tomb, though these deeds are represented, not in the Oriental manner directly, but in the Greek manner, clad in mythological forms. To the 4th century belong two other sarcophagi. Oneof these is called the Tomb of Mourning Women. On all sides of it alike are ranged a series of beautiful female figures, separated by Ionic pillars, each in a somewhat different attitude, though all attitudes denoting grief (fig. 45). The pediments at the ends of the cover are also closely connected with the mourning for the loss of a friend and See also:protector, which is the theme of the whole decoration of the sarcophagus. We see depicted in them the telling of the See also:news of the death, with the results in the mournful attitude of the two seated figures. The mourning women must be taken, not as the representation of any persons in particular, but generally as the expression of the feeling of a city. Such figures are familiar to us in the art of the second Attic school; we could easily find See also:parallels to the sarcophagus among the 4th-century sepulchral reliefs of Athens. We can scarcely be mistaken in attributing the workmanship of this beautiful sarcophagus to some sculptor trained in the school of Praxiteles. And it is a conjecture full of probability that it once contained the body of Strato, king of Sidon, who ruled about 38o B.c., and who was proxenos or public friend of the Athenians. More celebrated is the astonishing tomb called that of Alexander, though there can be no doubt that, although it commemorates the victories and exploits of Alexander, it was made not to hold his remains, but those of some ruler of Sidon who was high in his favour. Among all the monuments of antiquity which have come down to us, none is more admirable than this, and none more characteristic of the. Greek genius. We give, in two lines, the composition which adorned one of the sides of this sarcophagus. It represents a victory of Alexander, probably that of the Granicus (fig. 46). On the left we see the Macedonian king charging the Persian horse, on the right his general See also:Parmenio, and in the midst a younger officer, perhaps Cleitus. Mingled with the chiefs are foot-soldiers, Greek and Macedonian, with whom the Persians are mingled in unequal fray. What most strikes the modern eye is the remarkable freshness and force of the action and the attitudes. Those, however, who have seen the originals have been specially impressed with the colouring, whereof, of course, our engraving gives no hint, but which is applied to the whole surface of the relief with equal skill and delicacy. There are other features in the relief on which a Greek eye would have dwelt with See also:special See also:pleasure—the exceedingly careful symmetry of the whole, the balancing of figure against figure, the skill with which the result of the battle is hinted rather than depicted. The composition is one in which the most careful planning and the most precise calculation are mingled with freedom of hand and expressiveness in detail. The faces in particular show more expression than would be tolerated in art of the previous century. We are unable as yet to assign an author or even a school to the sculptor of this sarcophagus; he comes to us as a new and striking phenomenon in the history of ancient art. The reliefs which adorn the other sides of the sarcophagus are almost equally interesting. On one side we see Alexander again, in the See also:company of a Persian noble, hunting a lion. The short sides also show us scenes of fighting and hunting. In fact it can scarcely be doubted that if we had but a clue to the See also:interpretation of the reliefs, they would be found to embody historic events of the end of the 4th century.. There are but a few other works of art, such as the See also:Bayeux See also:tapestry and the Column of Trajan, which bring con-temporary history so vividly before our eyes. The battles with the Persians represented in some of the sculpture of the Parthenon and the temple of Nike at Athens are treated conventionally and with no attempt at realism; but here the ideal and the actual are blended into a work of consummate art, which is at the same time, to those who can read the language of Greek art, a historic record. The portraits of Alexander the Great which appear on this sarcophagus are almost contemporary, and the most See also:authentic likenesses of him which we possess. The great Macedonian exercised so strong an influence on contemporary art that a multitude of heads of the age, both of gods and men, and even the portraits of his successors, show traces of his type. We have yet to mention what are among the most charming and the most characteristic products of the Greek chisel, the beautiful tombs, adorned with seated or standing portraits or t ful Pompeian See also:mosaic (fig. 47), which represents the victory of with reliefs, which were erected in great See also:numbers on all the main Alexander at Issus. This work being in stone has preserved its roads of Greece. A great number of these from the Dipylon colouring; and it stands at a far higher level of art than ordinary cemetery are preserved in the Central Museum at Athens, and Pompeian paintings, which are the work of mere house-decorators. This on the contrary is certainly copied from the work of a great master. It is instructive to compare it with the sarcophagus illustrated in Fig.46, which it excels in perspective and in the freedom of individual figures, though the composition is much less careful and precise. Alexander charges from the left (his portrait being the least successful part of the picture), and bears down a young Persian; Darius in his chariot flee s towards t he right; in the foreground a young See also:knight is trying to See also:manage a restive horse. It will be observed how very simple is the indication of locality: a few stones and a broken tree stand for rocks and See also:woods. Among the original sculptural creations of the early Hellenistic age, a prominent place is claimed by the statue See also:Moro pole a Sidon, PI. 30. of See also:Fortune, typifying Hellas). Period IV. 300—50 P.c.—There can be no question but that the period which followed the death of Alexander, commonly called the age of See also:Hellenism, was one of great activity and expansion in architecture. The number of cities founded by himself and his immediate successors in Asia and Egypt was enormous. The remains of these cities have in a few cases (Ephesus, Pergamum, Assus, Priene, Alexandria) been partially excavated. But the adaptation of Greek architecture to the needs of the semi-Greek peoples included in the dominions of the kings of Egypt, See also:Syria and Pergamum is too vast a subject for us to enter upon here (see ARCHITECTURE). Painting during this age ceased to be religious. It was no longer for temples and public stoae that artists worked, but for private persons; especially they made frescoes for the decoration of the walls of houses, and See also:panel pictures for galleries set up by rich patrons. The names of very few painters of the Hellenistic age have come down to us. There can be no doubt that the character of the art declined, and there were no longer produced great works to be the pride of cities, or to form an embodiment for all future time of the qualities of a deity or the circumstances of scenes mythical or historic. But at the same time the mural paintings of Pompeii and other works of the Roman age, which are usually more or less nearly derived from Hellenistic models, prove that in technical matters painting continued to progress. Colouring became more varied, groups more elaborate, perspective was worked out with greater accuracy, and imagination shook itself free from many of the conventions of early art. Pompeian painting, however, must be treated of under Roman, not under Greek art. We figure a single example, to show the elaboration of painting at Alexandria and elsewhere, the wonder- Hamdy et Reinach. this we possess a small copy, which is sufficient to show how worthy of admiration was the original. We have a beautiful embodiment of the See also:personality of the city, seated on a See also:rock, holding ears of See also:corn, while the river See also:Orontes, embodied in a young male figure, springs forth at her feet. This is, so far as we know, almost the only work of the early part of the 3rd century which shows imagination. Sculptors often worked on a colossal scale, producing such monsters as the colossal Apollo at Rhodes, the work of See also:Chares of Lindus, which was more than roo ft. in height. But they did not show freshness or invention; and for the most part content themselves From a photograph by G. Brogi. with varying the types produced in the great schools of the 4th century. The wealthy kings of Syria, Egypt and Asia Minor formed art galleries, and were lavish in their payments; but it has often been proved in the history of art that originality cannot be produced by mere See also:expenditure. A great artist, whose date has been disputed, but who is now assigned to the Hellenistic age, See also:Damophon of Messene, is known to us from his actual works. He set up in the shrine of the See also:Mistress (Despoena) at See also:Lycosura in See also:Arcadia a great group of figures consisting of Despoena, Demeter, Artemis and the Titan Anytus. Three colossal heads found on the spot probably belong to the three last-mentioned deities. We illustrate the head of Anytus, with wild disordered hair and turbulent expression (fig. 48). Dr Dorpfeld has argued, on architectural grounds, that shrine and images alike must be given to a later time than the 4th century; and this See also:judgment is now confirmed by inscriptional and other evidence. In one important direction sculpture certainly made progress. Hitherto Greek sculptors had con-tented themselves with studying the human body whether in See also:rest or motion, from outside. The See also:dissection of the human body, with a consequent increase in knowledge of anatomy, became usual at Alexandria in the medical school which flourished under the See also:Ptolemies. This improved anatomical knowledge soon reacted upon the art of sculpture. Works such as the Fighter of See also:Agasias in the Louvre (Plate IV. fig. 69), and in a less degree the Apoxyomenus (Plate VI. fig. 79), display a remarkable See also:internal knowledge of the human frame, such as could only come from the habit of dissection. Whether this was really productive of improvement in sculpture may be doubted. But it is impossible to withhold one's admiration from works which show an astonishing knowledge of the body of man down to its bony framework, and a power and mastery of execution which have never since been surpassed. With accuracy in the portrayal of men's bodies goes of See also:necessity a more naturalistic tendency in portraiture. As we have seen, the art of portraiture was at a high ideal level in the Pheidian age; and even in the age of Alexander the Great, notable men were rendered rather according to the idea than the fact. To a base and See also:mechanical See also:naturalism Greek art never at any time descended. But from 300 B.C. onwards we have a marvellous series of portraits which may be termed rather characteristic than ideal, which are very See also:minute in their execution, and delight in laying emphasis on the havoc wrought by time and life on the faces of noteworthy men. Such are the portraits of See also:Demosthenes, of See also:Antisthenes, of See also:Zeno and others, which exist in our galleries. And it was no long step from these actual portraits to the invention of characteristic types to represent the great men of a past See also:generation, such as Homer and See also:Lycurgus, or to form generic images to represent weatherbeaten fishermen or toothless old women. Our knowledge of the art of the later Hellenistic age has received a great See also:accession since 1875 through the systematic labours directed by the German Archaeological Insti- tute, which have resulted in recovering the remains of Pergamum, the fortress-city which was the capital of the See also:dynasty of the Philetaeri. Among the ancient buildings of Pergamum none was more ambitious in scale and striking in execution than the great altar used for sacrifices to Zeus, a monument supposed to be referred to in the phrase of the See also:Apocalypse " where Satan's See also:throne is." This altar, like many great sacrificial altars of later Greece, was a vast erection to which one mounted by many steps, and its outside was adorned with a frieze which represented on a gigantic scale, in the style of the 2nd century B.C., the battle between the gods and the giants. This enormous frieze (see PERGAMUM) is now one of the treasures of the Royal Museums of Berlin, and it cannot fail to impress visitors by the size of the figures, the energy of the action, and the strong vein of sentiment which pervades the whole, giving it a certain air of modernity, though the subject is strange to the Christian world. In early Greek art the giants where they oppose the gods are represented as men armed in full See also:panoply, " in shining armour, holding long spears in their hands," to use the phrase in which See also:Hesiod describes them. But in the Pergamene frieze the giants are strange compounds, having the heads and bodies of wild and fierce barbarians, sometimes also human legs, but sometimes in the place of legs two long serpents, the heads of which take with the giants them-selves a See also:share in the battle. Sometimes also they are winged. The gods appear in the forms which had been gradually made for them in the course of Greek history, but they are usually accompanied by the animals sacred to them in cultus, between which and the serpent-feet of the giants a weird combat goes on. We can conjecture the source whence the Pergamene artist derived the shaggy hair, the fierce expression, the huge muscles of his giants (fig. 49); probably these features came originally from the See also:Galatians, who at the time had settled in Asia Minor, and were spreading the terror of their name and the See also:report of their See also:savage devastations through all Asia Minor. The victory over the giants clearly stands for the victory of Greek civilization over Gallic barbarism; and this meaning is made more emphatic because the gods are obviously inferior in physical force to their opponents, indeed, a large proportion of the divine combatants are goddesses. Yet everywhere the giants are overthrown, writhing in See also:pain on the ground, or transfixed by the weapons of their opponents; everywhere the gods are victorious, yet in the victory retain much of their divine See also:calm. The piecing together of the frieze at Berlin has been a labour of many years; it is now complete, and there is a special museum devoted to it. Some of the groups have become familiar to students from photographs, especially the group which represents Zeus slaying his enemies with thunderbolts, and the group wherein Athena seizes by the hair an overthrown opponent, who is winged, while Victory runs to See also:crown her, and beneath is seen Gaia, the See also:earth-goddess who is the See also:mother of the giants, rising out of the ground, and mourning over her vanquished and tortured children. Another and smaller frieze which also decorated the altar-place gives us scenes from the history of Telephus, who opposed the landing of the See also:army of See also:Agamemnon in Asia Minor and was over-thrown by Achilles. This frieze, which is quite fragmentary, is put together by Dr See also:Schneider in the Jahrbuck of the German Archaeological Institute for 1500. Since the Renaissance Rome has continually produced a See also:crop of works of Greek art of all periods, partly originals brought from Greece by conquering generals, partly copies, such as the group at Rome formerly known as Paetus and See also:Arria, and the overthrown giants and barbarians which came from the elaborate trophy set up by Attalus at Athens, of which copies exist in many museums. A noted work of kindred school is the group of See also:Laocoon and his sons (Plate I. fig. 52), signed by Rhodian sculptors of the 1st century B.C., which has been perhaps more discussed than any work of the Greek chisel, and served as a peg Altar of Pergamum. Pergamum. for the aesthetic theories of Leasing and Goethe. In our days See also:ture; A. Furtwangler, Masterpieces of Greek Sculpture, translated and the histrionic and strained character of the group is regarded as greatly diminishing its interest, in spite of the astounding skill and knowledge of the human body shown by the artists. To the same school belong the late representations of Marsyas being flayed by the victorious Apollo (Plate II. fig. S4), a some-what repulsive subject, chosen by the artists of this age as a means for displaying their accurate knowledge of anatomy. On what a scale some of the artists of Asia Minor would work is shown us by the enormous group, by See also:Apollonius and Tauriscus of See also:Tralles, which is called the See also:Farnese Bull (Plate I. fig. 51), and which represents how See also:Dirce was tied to a wild bull by her step-sons Zethus and See also:Amphion. The extensive excavations and alterations which have taken place at Rome in recent years have been very fruitful; the Rome. results may be found partly in the palace of the Conservatori on the Capitol, partly in the new museum of the Terme. Among recently found statues none excel in interest some bronzes of large size dating from the Hellenistic age. In the figure of a seated boxer (Plate V. fig. 72), in scale somewhat exceeding life, attitude and gesture are expressive. Evidently the boxer has fought already, and is awaiting a further conflict. His face is cut and swollen; on his hands are the terrible See also:caestus, here made of See also:leather, and not loaded with See also:iron, like the caestus described by See also:Virgil. The figure is of astounding force; but though the face is brutal and the expression savage, in the sweep of the limbs there is See also:nobility, even ideal beauty. To the last the Greek artist could not set aside his admiration for physical perfection. Another bronze figure of more than life-size is that of a king of the Hellenistic age standing leaning on a spear. He is absolutely nude, like the athletes of Polyclitus. Another large bronze presents us with a Hellenistic type of Dionysus. Besides the bronzes found in Rome we may set those recently found in the sea on the coast of See also:Cythera, the contents of a ship sailing from Greeee to Rome, and lost on the way. The date of these bronze statues has been disputed. In any case, even if executed in the Roman age, they go back to originals of the 5th and 4th centuries. The most noteworthy among them is a beautiful athlete (Plate V. fig. 73) standing with hand upraised, which reflects the style of the Attic school of the 4th century. After 146 B.C. when Corinth was destroyed and Greece became a Roman province, Greek art, though by no means See also:extinct, worked mainly in the employ of the Roman conquerors (see ROMAN ART). IV. SELECT BIBLIOGRAPHY.1—I. General works on Greek Art.—The only recent general histories of Greek art are: H. Brunn, Griechische Kunstgeschichte, bks. i. and ii., dealing with archaic art; W. Klein, Geschichte der griechischen lCunst, no illustrations; Perrot et Chipiez, Histoire de fart Bans l antiquite, vols. vii. and viii. (archaic art only). See also:Introductory are: P. Gardner, Grammar of Greek Art; J. E. See also:Harrison, Introductory Studies in Greek Art; H. B. Walters, Art of the Greeks.
Useful are also: H. Brunn, Geschichte der griechischen Kiinstler, (new edition, 1889) ; J. See also:Overbeck, See also:Die antiken Schriftquellen zur Geschichte der bildenden Kanste bei den Griechen; untranslated passages in Latin and Greek; the See also:Elder Pliny's Chapters on the History of Art, edited by K. Jex-See also:Blake and E. Sellers; H. S. See also: France: Revue archeologique ; See also:Gazette archeologique; Bulletin de correspondance hellenique. Germany: Jahrbuch des K. deutschen arch. Instituls; Mitteilungen des arch. Inst., Athenische Abteilung, Romische Abteilung; Antike Denkmeiler. Austria: Jahreshefte des K. Osterreich. arch. Insliluts. Italy: Publications of the Accademia dei Lincei; Monumenti antichi: Not. dei scavi; Bulletino comunale di See also:Roma. Greece: See also:Ephemeris archaiologike.; Deltion archaiologikon; Praktika of the Athenian Archaeological Society. IV. Greek Sculpture. General: M. Collignon, Histoire de la sculpture grecque (2 vols.); E. A. Gardner, Handbook of Greek Sculp- The date is given when the work cannot be considered new. edited by E. Sellers; Friederichs and Wolters, Bausteine zur Geschichte der griechisch-romischen Plastik (1887) ; von See also:Mach, Hand-book of Greek and Roman Sculpture, 500 plates; H. Guile, Der schOne Mensch in der Kunst: Altertum, 216 plates; S. Reinach, Repertoire de la statuaire grecque et romaine, 3 vols. V. Greek Painting and Vases.—Woltmann and Woermann, History of Painting, vol. i., translated and edited by S. See also:Col-vin (188o) ; H. B. Walters, History of Ancient Pottery (2 vols.) ; Harrison and See also:MacColl, Greek Vase-paintings (1894) ; O. Rayet at M. Collignon, Histoire de la ceramique grecque (1888) ; P. See also:Girard, La Peinture See also:antique. (1892) ; S. Reinach, Repertoire des vases peints grecs et etrusques (2 vols.) ; Furtwangler and Reichhold, "Griechische Vasenmalerei," Wiener Vorlegeblatter See also:fur archdologische Ubungen (1887–189o). VI. Special Schools and Sites.—A. Joubin, La Sculpture grecque entre See also:les guerres mediques et l'epoque de Pericles; C. Waldstein, Essays on the Art of Pheidias (1885) ; W. Klein, Praxiteles; G. Perrot, Praxitele; A. S. Murray, Sculptures of the Parthenon; W. Klein, Euphronios; E. Pottier, Douris; P. Gardner, Sculptured Tombs of Hellas; E. A. Gardner, Ancient Athens; A. Betticher, Olympia; See also:Bernoulli, Griechische Ikonographie; P. Gardner, The Types of Greek Coins (1883) ; E. A. Gardner, Six Greek Sculptors. Additional information and CommentsThere are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click, and select "copy." Then paste it into your website, email, or other HTML. Site content, images, and layout Copyright © 2006 - Net Industries, worldwide. |
|
[back] GREEK |
[next] GREEK INDEPENDENCE, WAR OF |