Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
See also:FRENCH LITERATURE . Origins.—The See also:history of French literature in the proper sense of the See also:term can hardly be said to extend farther back than the rlth See also:century. The actual See also:manuscripts which we possess are seldom of older date than the century subsequent to this. But there is no doubt that by the end at least of the 11th century the French See also:language, as a completely organized See also:medium of See also:literary expression, was in full, varied and See also:constant use. For many centuries previous to this, literature had been composed in See also:France, or by natives of that See also:country, using the term France in its full See also:modern acceptation; but until the 9th century, if not later, the written language of France, so far as we know, was Latin; and despite the practice of not a few literary historians, it does not seem reasonable to See also:notice Latin writings in a history of French literature. Such a history properly busies itself only with the monuments of French itself from the See also:time when the so-called Lingua Romany Rustica assumed a sufficiently See also:independent See also:form to deserve to be called a new language. This time it is indeed impossible exactly to determine, and the See also:period at which literary compositions, as distinguished from See also:mere conversation, began to employ the new See also:tongue is entirely unknown. As See also:early as the 7th century the Lingua See also:Romana, as distinguished from Latin and from See also:Teutonic dialects, is mentioned, and this Lingua Romana would be of See also:necessity used for purposes of clerical admonition, especially in the country districts, though we need not suppose that such addresses had a very literary See also:character. On the other See also:hand, the mention, at early See also:dates, of certain cantilenae or songs com- posed in the vulgar language has served for basis to a super- structure of much ingenious See also:argument with regard to the highly interesting problem of the origin of the Chansons de Geste, the earliest and one of the greatest literary developments of See also:northern French. It is sufficient in this See also:article, where See also:speculation would be out of See also:place, to mention that only two such cantilenae actually exist, and that neither is French. One of the 9th century, the " See also:Lay of Saucourt," is in a Teutonic See also:dialect; the other, the " See also:Song of St Faron," is of the 7th century, but exists only in Latin See also:prose, the construction and See also:style of which See also:present traces of trans- lation from a poetical and See also:vernacular See also:original. As far Early as facts go, the most See also:ancient monuments of the written monu- meats French language consist of a few documents of very various character, ranging in date from the 9th to the TTth century. The See also:oldest gives us the oaths interchanged at See also:Strassburg in 842 between See also: Whether they originated in the See also:north or the See also:south is a question on which there have been more than one or two revolutions of See also:opinion, and will probably be others still, but which need not be dealt with here. We possessin See also:round See also:numbers a See also:hundred of these chansons. Three only of them are in Provencal. Two of these, Ferabras and Betonnet d'Hanstonne, are obviously adaptations of French originals. The third, Girartz de Rossilho (See also:Gerard de See also:Roussillon), is undoubtedly Provencal, and is a See also:work of See also:great merit and originality, but its dialect is strongly tinged with the characteristics of the Langue d'OIl, and its author seems to have been a native of the debatable See also:land between the two districts. To suppose under these circumstances that the Provencal originals of the hundred others have perished seems gratuitous. It is sufficient to say that the chanson de geste, as it is now extant, is the almost exclusive See also:property of northern France. Nor is there much authority for a supposition that the early French poets merely versified with amplifications the stories of chroniclers. On the contrary, chroniclers draw largely from the chansons, and the question of priority between Roland and the pseudo-See also:Turpin, though a hard one to determine, seems to resolve itself in favour of the former. At most we may suppose, with much See also:probability, that See also:personal and See also:family tradition gave a See also:nucleus for at least the earliest. Chansons de Geste.—Early French narrative poetry was divided by one of its own writers, See also:Jean See also:Bodel, under three heads —poems See also:relating to French history, poems relating to Chansons ancient history, and poems of the Arthurian See also:cycle de Geste. (Matieres de France, de Bretagne, et de See also:Rome). To the first only is the term chansons de geste in strictness applicable. The See also:definition of it goes partly by form and partly by See also:matter. A chanson de geste must be written in verses either of ten or twelve syllables, the former being the earlier. These verses have a See also:regular See also:caesura, which, like the end of a line, carries with it the See also:licence of a See also:mute e. The lines are arranged, not in couplets or in stanzas of equal length, but in laisses or tirades, consisting of any number of lines from See also:half a dozen to some hundreds. These are, in the earlier examples assonanced,—that is to say, the vowel See also:sound of the last syllables is identical, but the consonants need not agree. Thus, for instance, the final words of a tirade of Amis et Amiles (11. 199-206) are erbe, nouvelle, selles, nouvelles, traversent, arrestent, guerre, cortege. Sometimes the tirade is completed by a shorter line, and the later chansons are regularly rhymed. As to the subject, a chanson de geste must be concerned with some event which is, or is supposed to be, See also:historical and French. The tendency of the trouveres was constantly to affiliate their heroes on a particular geste or family. The three See also:chief gestes are those of See also:Charlemagne himself, of Doon de Mayence, and of Garin de Monglane; but there are not a few chansons, notably those concerning the Lorrainers, and the remarkable See also:series sometimes called the See also:Chevalier an Cygne, and dealirg with the See also:crusades, which See also:lie outside these See also:groups. By this See also:joint definition of form and subject the chansons de geste are separated from the romances of antiquity, from the romances of the Round Table, which are written in octosyllabic couplets, and from the See also:romans d'aventures or later fictitious tales, some of which, such as Brun de la See also:Montaigne, are written in pure chanson form. Not the least remarkable point about the chansons de geste is their vast extent. Their number, according to the strictest definition, exceeds Too, and the length of each chanson See also:volume varies from woo lines, or thereabouts, to 20,000 or and even 30,000. The entire See also:mass, including, it may be changes of supposed, the various versions and extensions of each early epics. chanson, is said to amount to between two and three million lines; and when, under the second See also:empire, the publication of the whole Carolingian cycle was projected, it was estimated, taking the earliest versions alone, at over 300,000. The successive developments of the chansons de geste may be illustrated by the fortunes of Huon de See also:Bordeaux, one of the most lively, varied and romantic of the older epics, and one which is interesting from the use made of it by See also:Shakespeare, See also:Wieland and See also:Weber. In the oldest form now extant, though even this is probably not the original, Huon consists of over 1o,000 lines. A subsequent version contains 4000 more; and lastly, in the Toth century, a later poet has amplified the See also:legend to the extent of 30,000 lines. When this point had been reached, Huon began to be turned into prose, was with many of his See also:fellows published and republished during the 15th and subsequent centuries, and retains, in the form of a roughly printed See also:chap-See also:book, the favour of the country districts of France to the present See also:day. It is not, however, in the later versions that the See also:special characteristics of the chansons de geste are to be looked for. Of those which we possess, one and one only, the Chanson de Roland, belongs in its present form to the 11th century. Their date of See also:production extends, speaking roughly, from the 1th to the 14th century, their palmy days were the 11th and the 12th. After this latter period the Arthurian romances, with more complex attractions, became their rivals, and induced their authors to make great changes in their style and subject. But for a time they reigned supreme, and no better instance of their popularity can be given than the fact that manuscripts of them exist, not merely in every French dialect, but in many cases in a See also:strange macaronic See also:jargon of mingled French and See also:Italian. Two classes of persons were concerned in them. There was the See also:trouvere who composed them, and the jongleur who carried them about in manuscript or in his memory from See also:castle to castle amd sang them, intermixing frequent appeals to his auditory for silence, declarations of the novelty and the strict See also:copyright character of the chanson, revilings of See also:rival minstrels, and frequently See also:requests for See also:money in See also:plain words. Not a few of the manuscripts which we now possess appear to have been actually used by the jongleur. But the names of the authors, the trouveres who actually composed them, are in very few cases known, those of copyists, continuators, and mere possessors of manuscripts having been often mistaken for them. The moral and poetical peculiarities of the older and more See also:authentic of these chansons are strongly marked, though perhaps not quite so strongly as some of their encomiasts have contended, and as may appear to a reader of the most famous of them, the Chanson de Roland, alone. In that poem, indeed, See also:war and See also:religion are the See also:sole motives employed, and its See also:motto might be two lines from another of the finest chansons (Aliscans, 161-162) : " Dist A. Bertran ' N'avons mais nul losir, Tant ke vivons alons paiens ferir.' " In Roland there is no love-making whatever, and the See also:hero's betrothed " la belle See also:Aude " appears only in a casual gibe of her See also:brother See also:Oliver, and in the incident of her sudden See also:death at the See also:news of Roland's fall. M. See also:Leon See also:Gautier and others have See also:drawn the conclusion that this stern and masculine character was a feature of all the older chansons, and that See also:imitation of the Arthurian See also:romance is the cause of its disappearance. This seems rather a hasty inference. In Amis et Amiles, admittedly a poem of old date, the parts of Bellicent and Lubias are prominent, and the former is See also:demonstrative enough. In Aliscans the part of the Countess Guibourc is both prominent and heroic, and is seconded by that of See also:Queen Blancheflor and her daughter Aelis. We might also mention Oriabel in Jourdans de Blaivies and others. But it may be admitted that the See also:sex which fights and counsels plays the principal part, that love adventures are not introduced at any great length, and that the See also:lady usually spares her See also:knight the trouble and possible indignities of a See also:long wooing. The characters of a chanson of the older style are somewhat See also:uniform. There is the hero who is unjustly suspected of See also:guilt or sore beset by See also:Saracens, the heroine who falls in love with him, the traitor who accuses him or delays help, who is almost always of the lineage of Ganelon, and whose ways form a very curious study. There are friendly paladins and subordinate traitors; there is Charlemagne (who bears throughout the marks of the epic See also: The most remarkable of the chansons are Roland, Aliscans, Gerard de Roussillon, Amis et Amiles, Raoul de See also:Cambrai, Garin le Loherain and its sequel See also:Les quatre Fils A ymon, Les Saisnes (recounting the war of Charlemagne with Witekind), and lastly, Le Chevalier au Cygne,which is not a single poem but a series, dealing with the earlier crusades. The most remarkable See also:group is that centring round See also: The gentix ber contradicts, jeers at, and execrates his See also:sovereign and his fellows with the utmost freedom. He thinks nothing of striking his See also:tortoise moullier so that the See also:blood runs down her cler vis. If a servant or even an equal offends him, he will throw the offender into the See also:fire, knock his brains out, or set his whiskers ablaze. The Arthurian knight is far more of the modern See also:model in these respects. But his chief difference from his predecessor is undoubtedly in his amorous devotion to his beloved, who, if not morally See also:superior to Bellicent, Floripas, Esclairmonde, and the other Carlovingian heroines, is somewhat less forward. Even in See also:minute details the difference is strongly marked. The romances are in octosyllabic couplets or in prose, and their language is different from that of the chansons, and contains much fewer of the usual epic repetitions and stock phrases. A voluminous controversy has been held respecting the origin of these See also:differences, and of the story or stories which were destined to receive such remarkable See also:attention. Reference must be made to the article ARTHURIAN LEGEND for the history of this controversy and for an See also:account of its present See also:state. This state, however, and all subsequent states, are likely to be rather dependent upon opinion than upon actual knowledge. From the point of view of the See also:general historian of literature it may not be improper here to give a caution against the frequent use of the word " proven" in such matters. Very little in regard to early literature, except the literary value of the texts, is ever susceptible of See also:proof; although things may be made more or less probable. What we are at present concerned with, however, is a See also:body of verse and prose composed in the latter part of the 12th century and later. The earliest romances, the Saint Graal, the Que"te du Saint Graal, See also:Joseph d'Arimathie and See also:Merlin bear the names of See also:Walter See also:Map and See also:Robert de Borron. See also:Arius and part at least of See also:Lancelot du See also:Lac (the whole of which has been by turns attributed and denied to Walter Map) appear to be due to unknown authors. See also:Tristan came later, and has a stronger mixture of Celtic tradition. At the same time as Walter Map, or a little later, Chretien (or See also:Chrestien) de See also:Troyes threw the legends of the Round Table into octosyllabic verse of a singularly spirite$ and picturesque character. The chief poems attributed to him are the Chevalier au See also:Lyon (See also:Sir Ewain of See also:Wales), the Chevalier d la Charette (one ~ of the episodes of Lancelot), See also:Eric et Enide, Tristan and Percivale. These poems, independently of their merit, which is great, had an extensive literary See also:influence. They were translated by the German See also:minnesingers, Wolfram von Eschenbach, Gottfried of Strassburg, and others. With the romances already referred to, which are mostly in prose, and which by See also:recent authorities have been put later than the verse tales which used to be postponed to them, Chretien's poems See also:complete the early forms of the Arthurian story, and See also:supply the matter of it as it is best known to See also:English readers in See also:Malory's book. Nor does that book, though far later than the original forms, convey a very false impression of the characteristics of the older romances. Indeed, the Arthurian knight, his character and adventures, are so much better known than the heroes of the Carlovingian chanson that there is less need to dwell upon them. They had, however, as has been already pointed out, great influence upon their rivals, and their See also:comparative fertility of invention, the much larger number of their dramatis personae, and the greater variety of interests to which they appealed, sufficiently explain their increased popularity. The See also:ordinary attractions of poetry are also more largely present in them than in the chansons; there is more description, more life, and less of the mere See also:chronicle. They have been accused of relaxing morality, and there is perhaps some truth in the See also:charge. But the See also:change is after all one rather of See also:manners than of morals, and what is lost in simplicity is gained in refinement. Doon de Mayence is a late chanson, and Lancelot du Lac is an early romance. But the two beautiful scenes, in the former between Doon and Nicolette, in the latter between Lancelot, Galahault, Guinevere, and the Lady of Malehaut, may be compared as instances of the attitude of the two classes of poets towards the same subject.
Romances of Antiquity.—There is yet a third class of early narrative poems, differing from the two former in subject, but agreeing, sometimes with one sometimes with the other in form. These are the classical romances—the Matiere de Rome—which are not much later than those of Charlemagne and Arthur. The chief subjects with which their authors busied themselves were the conquests of See also: The authorities consulted for these poems were, as may be supposed, none of the best. Dares Phrygius, Dictys Cretensis, the pseudo-See also:Callisthenes supplied most of them. But the inexhaustible invention of the trouveres themselves was the chief authority consulted. The adventures of See also:Medea, the wanderings of Alexander, the Trojan See also:horse, the story of See also:Thebes, were quite sufficient to See also:spur on to exertion the minds which had been accustomed to spin a chanson of some ro,000 lines out of a casual allusion in some preceding poem. It is needless to say that anachronisms did not disturb them. From first to last the writers of the chansons had not in the least troubled themselves with attention to any such matters. Charlemagne himself had his life and exploits accommodated to the need of every poet who treats of him, and the same is the case with the heroes of antiquity. Indeed, Alexander is made in many respects a prototype of Charlemagne. He is regularly knighted, he has twelve peers, he holds tournaments, he has relations with Arthur, and comes in contact with fairies, he takes flights in the See also:air, dives in the See also:sea and so forth. There is perhaps more avowed imaginationin these classical stories than in either of the other divisions of French epic poetry. Some of their authors even confess to the practice of fiction, while the trouveres of the chansons invariably assert the historical character of their facts and personages, and the authors of the Arthurian romances at least start from facts vouched for, partly by See also:national tradition, partly by the authority of religion and the church. The classical romances, however, are important in two different ways. In the first place, they connect the early literature of France, however loosely, and with links of however dubious authenticity, with the great history and literature of the past. They show a certain amount of See also:scholar-See also:ship in their authors, and in their hearers they show a capacity of taking an interest in subjects which are not merely those directly connected with the See also:village or the tribe. The chansons de geste had shown the creative See also:power and independent character of French literature. There is, at least about the earlier ones, nothing borrowed, traditional or scholarly. They See also:smack of the See also:soil, and they See also:rank France among the very few countries which, in this matter of indigenous growth, have yielded more than folk-songs and fireside tales. The Arthurian romances, less independent in origin, exhibit a wider range of view, a greater knowledge of human nature, and a more extensive command of the See also:sources of poetical and romantic interest. The classical epics superadd the only ingredient necessary to an accomplished literature-that is to say, the knowledge of what has been done by other peoples and other literatures already, and the readiness to take See also:advantage of the materials thus supplied. Romans d'Aventures.—These are the three earliest developments of French literature on the great See also:scale. They led, however, to a See also:fourth, which, though later in date than all except their latest forms and far more loosely associated as a group, is so closely connected with them by literary and social considerations that it had best be mentioned here. This is the roman d'aventures, a See also:title given to those almost avowedly fictitious poems which connect themselves, mainly and centrally, neither with French history, with the Round Table, nor with the heroes of antiquity. These began to be written in the 13th century, and continued until the prose form of fiction became generally preferred. The later forms of the chansons de geste and the Arthurian poems might indeed be well called romans d'aventures them-selves. See also:Hugues Ca pet, for instance, a chanson in form and class of subject, is certainly one of this latter See also:kind in treatment; and there is a larger class of semi-Arthurian romance, which so to speak branches off from the See also:main See also:trunk. But for convenience See also:sake the definition we have given is preferable. The style and subject of these romans d'aventures are naturally extremely various. See also:Guillaume de Palerme deals with the adventures of a Sicilian See also:prince who is befriended by a were-See also:wolf; Le Roman de l'escoufle, with a heroine whose See also:ring is carried off by a See also:sparrow-See also:hawk (escoufle), like Prince Camaralzaman's See also:talisman; See also:Guy of See also:Warwick, with one of the most famous of imaginary heroes; Meraugis de Portleguez is a sort of See also:branch or offshoot of the romances of the Round Table; Cleomades, the work of the trouvere See also:Adenes le Roi, who also rehandled the old chanson subjects of Ogier and Berle aux grans pies, connects itself once more with the Arabian Nights as well as with See also:Chaucer forwards in the introduction of a flying See also:mechanical horse. There is, in short, no possibility of classifying their subjects. The See also:habit of See also:writing in gestes, or of necessarily connecting the new work with an older one, had ceased to be binding, and the See also:instinct of fiction writing was See also:free; yet those romans d'aventures do not rank quite as high in literary importance as the classes which preceded them. This under-valuation arises rather from a lack of originality and distinctness of savour than from any shortcomings in treatment. Their versification, usually octosyllabic, is pleasant enough; but there is not much distinctness of character about them, and their incidents often strike the reader with something of the sameness, but seldom with much of the naivete, of those of the older poems. Nevertheless some of them attained to a very high popularity, such, for instance, as the Partenopex de See also:Blois of See also:Denis Pyramus, which has a See also:motive drawn from the story of See also:Cupid and See also:Psyche and the charming Floire et Blanchefleur, giving the woes of a See also:Christian prince and a Saracen slave-girl. With them may be connected a certain number of early romances and See also:fictions of various dates in prose, none of which can See also:vie in See also:charm with Aucassin et Nicolette (13th century), an exquisite literary presentment of See also:medieval sentiment in its most delightful form. In these classes may be said to be summed up the literature of feudal chivalry in France. They were all, except perhaps the last, General composed by one class of persons, the trouver es, and character- performed by another, the jongleurs. The latter, 'sties of indeed, sometimes presumed to compose for himself, early and was denounced as a troveor batard by the indignant narrative. members of the superior See also:caste. They were all originally intended to be performed in the palais marberin of the See also:baron to an See also:audience of knights and ladies, and, when See also:reading became more common, to be read by such persons. They dealt therefore chiefly, if not exclusively, with the class to whom they were addressed. The See also:bourgeois and the villain, personages of See also:political nonentity at the time of their early composition, come in for far slighter notice, although occasionally in the few curious instances we have mentioned, and others, persons of a class inferior to the seigneur See also:play an important part. The habit of private See also:wars and of insurrection against the sovereign supply the motives of the chanson de geste, the love of gallantry, See also:adventure and foreign travel those of the romances Arthurian and See also:miscellaneous. None of these motives much affected the See also:lower classes, who were, with the early See also:developed See also:temper of the See also:middle- and lower-class Frenchman, already See also:apt to think and speak cynically enough of tournaments, courts, crusades and the other occupations of the See also:nobility. The communal See also:system was springing up, the towns were receiving royal encouragement as a counterpoise to the authority of the nobles. The corruptions and maladministration of the church attracted the See also:satire rather of the citizens and peasantry who suffered by them, than of the nobles who had less to fear and even something to gain. spread of On the other hand, the See also:gradual spread of learning, literary See also:taste, inaccurate and See also:ill-digested perhaps, but still learning, not only opened up new classes of subjects, but opened them to new classes of persons. The thousands of students who flocked to the See also:schools of See also:Paris were not all princes or nobles. Hence there arose two new classes of literature, the first consisting of the embodiment of learning of one kind or other in the vulgar tongue. The other, one of the most remarkable developments of sportive literature which the See also:world has seen, produced the second indigenous literary growth of which France can boast, namely, the fabliaux, and the almost more remarkable work which is an immense See also:conglomerate of fabliaux, the great beast-epic of the Roman de Renart. Fabliaux.—There are few literary products which have more originality and at the same time more diversity than the See also:fabliau. The epic and the See also:drama, even when they are independently produced, are similar in their main characteristics all the world over. But there is nothing in previous literature which exactly corresponds to the fabliau. It comes nearest to the Aesopic See also:fable and its eastern origins or See also:parallels. But differs from these in being less allegorical, less obviously moral (though a moral of some sort is usually if not always enforced), and in having a much more See also:direct personal interest. It is in many degrees further removed from the See also:parable, and many degrees nearer to the novel. The story is the first thing, the moral the second, and the latter is never suffered to interfere with the former. These observations apply only to the fabliaux, properly so called, but the term has been used with considerable looseness. The collectors of those interesting pieces, Barbazan, Meon, Le See also:Grand d'Aussy, have included in their collections large numbers of miscellaneous pieces such as dits (rhymed descriptions of various See also:objects, the most famous known author of which was Baudouin de See also:Conde, 13th century), and Mats (discussions between two persons or contrasts of the attributes of two things), sometimes even short romances, farces and See also:mystery plays. Not that the fable proper—the prose classical beast-story of " See also:Aesop "--was neglected. See also:Marie de France—the poetess to be mentioned again for her more strictly poetical work—is the most literaryof not a few writers who composed what were often, after the mysterious original poet, named Ysopets. Aesop, See also:Phaedrus, See also:Babrius were translated and imitated in Latin and in the vernacular by this class of writer, and some of the best known of " fablers " date from this time. The fabliau, on the other hand, according to the best definition of it yet achieved, is " the See also:recital, generally comic, of a real or possible incident occurring in ordinary human life." The See also:comedy, it may be added, is usually of a satiric kind, and occupies itself with every class and rank of men, from the king to the villain. There is no limit to the variety of these lively verse-tales, which are invariably written in eight-syllabled couplets. Now the subject is the misadventure of two Englishmen, whose See also:ignorance of the French language makes them confuse donkey and See also:lamb; now it is the fortunes of an exceedingly foolish knight, who has an amiable and ingenious See also:mother-in-See also:law; now the deserved sufferings of an avaricious or ill-behaved See also:priest; now the bringing of an ungrateful son to a better mind by the See also:wisdom of babes and sucklings. Not a few of the See also:Canterbury Tales are taken directly from fabliaux; indeed, Chaucer, with the possible exception of See also:Prior, is our nearest approach to a fabliau-writer. At the other end of See also:Europe the prose novels of See also:Boccaccio and other Italian See also:tale-tellers are largely based upon fabliaux. But their influence in their own country was the greatest. They were the first expression of the spirit which has since animated the most national and popular developments of French literature. See also:Simple and unpretending as they are in form, the fabliaux announce not merely the Cent Nouvelles Nouvelles and the Heptameron, L'Avocat Patelin, and Pantagruel, but also L'Avare and the Roman comique, Gil Blas and Candide. They indeed do more than merely prophesy the spirit of these great performances —they directly See also:lead to them. The prose-tale and the See also:farce are the direct outcomes of the fabliau, and the prose-tale and the farce once given, the novel and the comedy inevitably follow. The special period of fabliau composition appears to have been the 12th and 13th centuries. It signifies on the one See also:side the growth of a lighter and more sportive spirit than had social yet prevailed, on another the rise in importance of import-other and lower orders of men than the priest and the "See also:ice of See also:noble, on yet another the consciousness on the 'part fabliaux of these lower orders of the defects of the two privileged classes, and of the shortcomings of the system of polity under which these privileged classes enjoyed their privileges. There is, how-ever, in the fabliau proper not so very much of direct satire, this being indeed excluded by the definition given above, and by the thoroughly See also:artistic spirit in which that definition is observed. The fabliaux are so numerous and so various that it is difficult to select any as specially representative. We may, however, mention, both as See also:good examples and as interesting from their subsequent history, Le Vair Palfroi, treated in English by See also:Leigh See also:Hunt and by See also:Peacock; Le Vilain Mire, the original consciously or unconsciously followed in Le Medecin malgre lui; Le Roi d'Angleterre et le jongleur d'See also:Ali; La houce partie; Le Sot Chevalier, an indecorous but extremely amusing story; Les deux bordeors ribaus, a See also:dialogue between two jongleurs of great literary interest, containing allusions to the chansons de geste and romances most in vogue; and Le vilain qui conquist paradis See also:par See also:plait, one of the numerous instances of what has unnecessarily puzzled moderns, the association in medieval times of sincere and unfeigned faith with extremely free handling of its objects. This lightheartedness in other subjects sometimes bubbled over into the fatrasie, an almost pure nonsense-piece, See also:parent of the later amphigouri. Roman de Renart.—If the fabliaux are not remarkable for direct satire, that element is supplied in more than compensating quantity by an extraordinary composition which is closely related to them. Le Roman de Renart, or History of Reynard the See also:Fox, is a poem, or rather series of poems, which, from the end of the 12th to the middle of the 14th century, served the See also:citizen poets of northern France, not merely as an outlet for literary expression, but also as a vehicle of satirical comment,--now on the general vices and weaknesses of humanity, now on the usual corruptions in church and state, now on the various historical events which occupied public attention from time to time. The enormous popularity of the subject is shown by the long vogue which it had, and by the empire which it exercised over generations of writers who differed from each other widely in style and temper. Nothing can be farther from the allegorical erudition, the political diatribes and the sermonizing moralities of the authors of Renart le Contre-fait than the sly naivete of the writers of the earlier branches. Yet these and a long and unknown series of intermediate bards the fox-king pressed into his service, and it is scarcely too much to say that, during the two centuries of his reign, there was hardly a thought in the popular mind which, as it See also:rose to the See also:surface, did not find expression in an addition to the huge cycle of Renart. We shall not See also:deal with the controversies which have been raised as to the origin of the poem and its central See also:idea. The latter may have been a travestie of real persons and actual events, or it may (and much more probably) have been an expression of thoughts and experiences which recur in every See also:generation. France, the See also:Netherlands and See also:Germany have contended for the See also:honour of producing Renart; French, Flemish, German and Latin for the honour of first describing him. It is sufficient to say that the spirit of the work seems to be more that of the borderland between France and See also:Flanders than of any other See also:district, and that, wherever the idea may have originally arisen, it was incomparably more fruitful in France than in any other country. The French poems which we possess on the subject amount in all to nearly roo,000 lines, independently of mere See also:variations, but including the different versions of Renart le Contre-fait. This vast See also:total is divided into four different poems. The most ancient and remarkable is that edited by Meon under the title of Roman du Renart, and containing, with some additions made by M. Chabaille, 37 branches and about 32,000 lines. It must not, however, be supposed that this total forms a continuous poem like the Aeneid or See also:Paradise Lost. Part was See also:pretty certainly written by See also:Pierre de Saint-See also:Cloud, but he was not the author of the whole. On the contrary, the See also:separate branches are the work of different authors, hardly any of whom are known, and, but for their community of subject and to some extent of treatment, might. be regarded as separate poems. The history of Renart, his victories over Isengrim, the wolf, Bruin, the bear, and his other unfortunate rivals, his family See also:affection, his outwittings of King Noble the See also:Lion and all the See also:rest, are too well known to need fresh description here. It is perhaps in the subsequent poems, though they are far less known and much less amusing, that the hold which the idea of Renart had obtained on the mind of northern France, and the ingenious uses to which it was put, are best shown. The first of these is Le Couronnement Renart, a poem of between 3000 and 4000 lines, attributed, on no grounds whatever, to the poetess Marie de France, and describing how the hero by his ingenuity got himself crowned king. This poem already shows signs of direct moral application and generalizing. These are still more apparent in Renart le Nouvel, a composition of some 8000 lines, finished in the See also:year 1288 by the See also:Fleming Jacquemart Gielee. Here the personification, of which, in noticing the Roman de la rose, we shall soon have to give extended mention, becomes evident. Instead of or at least beside the lively personal Renart who used to steal sausages, set Isengrim fishing with his tail, or make use of Chanticleer's See also:comb for a purpose for which it was certainly never intended, we have Renardie, an See also:abstraction of guile and See also:hypocrisy, triumphantly prevailing over other and better qualities. Lastly, as the Roman de la rose of William of Lorris is paralleled by Renart le Nouvel, so its continuation by Jean de Meung is paralleled by the great See also:miscellany of Renart le Contrefait, which, even in its existing versions, extends to fully 50,000 lines. Here we have, besides floods of miscellaneous erudition and discourse, political argument of the most direct and important kind. The wrongs of the lower orders are bitterly urged. They are almost openly incited to revolt; and it is scarcely too much to say, as M. Lenient has said, that the closely following See also:Jacquerie is but a See also:practical carrying out of the doctrines of the See also:anonymous satirists of Renart le Contre fait, one of whom (ifindeed there was more than one) appears to have been a clerk of Troyes.
Early Lyric Poetry.—Side by side with these two forms of literature, the epics and romances of the higher classes, and the fabliau, which, at least in its original, represented rather the feelings of the lower, there See also:grew up a third kind, consisting of purely lyrical poetry. The song literature of medieval France is extremely abundant and beautiful. From the 12th to the 15th century it received constant accessions, some signed, some anonymous, some purely popular in their character, some the work of more learned writers, others again produced by members of the See also:aristocracy. Of the latter class it may fairly be said that the See also:catalogue of royal and noble authors boasts few if any names superior to those of See also:Thibaut de See also:Champagne, king of See also:Navarre at the beginning of the 13th century, and Charles d'See also: Paulin Paris was able to enumerate some hundreds of French chansonniers between the See also:firth and the 13th century. The earliest song literature, chiefly known in the delightful collection of Bartsch (Allfranzosische Romanzen and Pastourellen), is mainly sentimental in character. The See also:collector divides it under the two heads of romances and pastourelles, the former being usually the celebration of the loves of a noble knight and See also:maiden, and recounting how Belle Doette or See also:Eglantine or Oriour sat at her windows or in the tourney See also:gallery, or embroidering See also:silk and samite in her chamber, with her thoughts on Gerard or Guy or See also: (1201-1253), who See also:united by his possessions and ancestry a connexion ae Th;bCbaaatn2 with the north and the south, and who employed the pagne. methods of both districts but used the language of the north only. Thibaut was supposed to be the See also:lover of See also:Blanche of See also:Castile, the mother of St Louis, and a great deal of his verse is concerned with his love for her. But while knights and nobles were thus employing lyric poetry in courtly and sentimental verse, lyric forms were being freely employed by others, both of high and low birth, for more general purposes. Blanche and Thibaut themselves came in for contemporary lampoons, and both at this time and in the times immediately following, a cloud of writers composed light verse, sometimes of a lyric sometimes of a narrative kind, and sometimes in a mixture of both. By far the most remarkable of these is Rutebceuf (a name which Rutebceuf. is perhaps a See also:nickname), the first of a long series of French poets to whom in recent days the title Bohemian has been applied, who passed their lives between gaiety and misery, and celebrated their See also:lot in both conditions with copious verse. Rutebceuf is among the earliest French writers who tell us their personal history and make personal appeals. But he does not confine himself to these. He discusses the history of his times, romances dealing with the crusades, and entitled Le Chevalier au Cygne. Baudouin de Sebourc dates from the early years of the 14th century. It is strictly a chanson de geste in form, and also in the general run of its incidents. The hero is dispossessed of his See also:inheritance by the agency of traitors, fights his See also:battle with the world and its injustice, and at last prevails over his enemy Gaufrois, who has succeeded in obtaining the See also:kingdom of See also:Fries-land and almost that of France. Gaufrois has as his assistants two personages who were very popular in the poetry of the time, viz., the See also:Devil, and Money. These two sinister figures pervade the fabliaux, tales and fantastic literature generally of the time. M. Lenient, the historian of French satire, has well remarked that a romance as long as the Renart might be spun out of the separate short poems of this period which have the Devil for hero, and many of which form a very interesting transition between the fabliau and the mystery. But the Devil is in one respect a far inferior hero to Renart. He has an adversary in the Virgin, who constantly upsets his best-laid schemes, and who does not always treat him quite fairly. The abuse of See also:usury at the time, and the exactions of the See also:Jews and See also:Lombards, were severely See also:felt, and Money itself, as personified, figures largely in the popular literature of the time. Roman de la Rose.—A work of very different importance from all of these, though with seeming touches of the same spirit, a work which deserves to take rank among the most important of the middle ages, is the Roman de la rose, Lwmord~amsof . —one of the few really remarkable books which is the work of two authors, and that not in collaboration but in continuation one of the other. The author of the earlier part was Guillaume de Lorris, who lived in the first half of the 13th century; the author of the later part was Jean de Meung, who was born about the middle of that century, and whose part in the Roman dates at least from its extreme end. This great poem exhibits in its two parts very different characteristics, which yet go to make up a not inharmonious whole. It is a love poem, and yet it is satire. But both gallantry and raillery are treated in an entirely allegorical spirit; and this See also:allegory, while it makes the poem tedious to hasty appetites of to-day, was exactly what gave it its charm in the eyes of the middle ages. It might be described as an Ars amoris crossed with a Quodlibeta. This mixture exactly See also:hit the taste of the time, and continued to hit it for two centuries and a half. When its obvious and gallant meaning was attacked by moralists and theologians, it was easy to quote the example of the See also:Canticles, and to furnish See also:esoteric explanations of the allegory. The writers of the 16th century were never tired of quoting and explaining it. See also:Antoine de Baif, indeed, gave the simple and obvious meaning, and declared that " La rose c'est d'amours le guerdon gracieux "; but See also:Marot, on the other hand, gives us the choice of four mystical interpretations,—the rose being either the state of wisdom, the state of See also:grace, the state of eternal happiness or the Virgin herself. We cannot here analyse this celebrated poem. It is sufficient to say that the lover meets all sorts of obstacles in his pursuit of the rose, though he has for a See also:guide the metaphorical personage See also:Bel-Accueil. The early part, which belongs to William of Lorris, is remarkable for its gracious and fanciful descriptions. See also:Forty years after Lorris's jean de death, Jean de Meung completed it in an entirely Meung. different spirit. He keeps the allegorical form, and indeed introduces two new personages of importance, Nature and Faux-semblant. In the mouths of these personages and of another, Raison, he puts the most extraordinary mixture of erudition and satire. At one time we have the history of classical heroes, at another theories against the hoarding of money, about See also:astronomy, about the duty of mankind to increase and multiply. Accounts of the origin of See also:loyalty, which would have cost the poet his head at some periods of history, and even communistic ideas, are also to be found here. In Faux-semblant we have a real creation of the theatrical hypocrite. All this miscellaneous and apparently incongruous material in fact explains the success of the poem. It has the one characteristic which has at all times secured the popularity of great See also:works of literature. It holds the See also:mirror up firmly and fully to its age. As we find in See also:Rabelais upbraids the nobles for their See also:desertion of the Latin empire of See also:Constantinople, considers the expediency of crusading, inveighs against the religious orders, and takes part in the disputes between the See also:pope and the king. He composes pious poetry too, and in at least one poem takes care to distinguish between the church which he venerates and the corrupt churchmen whom he lampoons. Besides Rutebceuf the most characteristic figure of his class and time (about the middle of the 13th century) is Adam de la Halle, commonly called the Hunchback Adam de of See also:Arras. The earlier poems of Adam are of a senti- la See also:Kane. See also:mental character, the later ones satirical and somewhat ill-tempered. Such, for instance, is his invective against his native See also:city. But his chief importance consists in his jeux, the Jeu de la feuillie, the Jeu de See also:Robin et See also:Marion, dramatic compositions which led the way to the regular dramatic form. Indeed the general tendency of the 13th century is to satire, fable and farce, even more than to serious or sentimental poetry. We
should perhaps except the laic, the chief of which
Lets.
are known under the name of Marie de France. These
See also:lays are exclusively See also:Breton in origin, though not in application, and the term seems originally to have had reference rather to the music to which they were sung than to the manner or matter of the pieces. Some resemblance to these lays may perhaps be traced in the genuine Breton songs published by M. Luzel. The subjects of the lais are indifferently taken from the Arthurian cycle, from ancient story, and from popular tradition, and, at any See also:rate in Marie's hands, they give occasion for some passionate, and in the modern sense really romantic, poetry. The most famous of all is the Lay of the See also:Honeysuckle, traditionally assigned to Sir Tristram.
Satiric and Didactic Works.—Among the direct satirists of the middle ages, one of the earliest and foremost is See also:Guyot de Provins, a See also: The hero Audigier is a model of cowardice and disloyalty; his father and mother, Turgibus and Rainberge, are deformed and repulsive. The exploits of the hero himself are coarse and hideous failures, and the whole poem can only be taken as a counterblast to the spirit of chivalry. Elsewhere a trouvere, prophetic of Rabelais, describes a vast battle between all the nations of the world, the See also:quarrel being suddenly atoned by the arrival of a holy man bearing a huge flagon of See also:wine. Again, we have the history of a See also:solemn crusade undertaken by the citizens of a country See also:town against the neighbouring castle. As erudition and the See also:fancy for allegory gained ground, satire naturally availed itself of the opportunity thus afforded it; the disputes of Philippe le Bel with the pope and the See also:Templars had an immense literary influence, partly in the concluding portions of the Renart, partly in the Roman de la rose, still to be mentioned, and partly in other satiric allegories of which the chief is the romance of $auvel, attributed to See also:Francois de Rues. The hero of this is an allegorical personage, half man and half horse, signifying the See also:union of bestial degradation with human ingenuity and cunning. Fauvel (the name, it may be See also:worth while to recall, occurs in See also:Langland) is a divinity in his way. All the personages of state, from See also:kings and popes to mendicant friars, pay their See also:court to him. But this serious and discontented spirit betrays itself also in compositions which are not parodies or travesties in form. One of the latest, if not absolutely the latest (for Cuvelier's still later Chronique de Du Guesclin is only a most interesting imitation of the chanson form adapted to recent events), of the chansons de geste is Baudouin de Sebourc, one of the members of the great romance or cycle of Baudouin de Sebourc. frequent and popular. The same century, moreover, which witnessed these developments of well-intentioned if not always judicious erudition witnessed also a considerable change in lyrical poetry. Hitherto such poetry had chiefly Artif cia/ been composed osed in the melodious but unconstrained formsse.
of
forms of the romance and the pastourelle. In the
14th century the writers of northern France subjected themselves to severer rules. In this age arose the forms which for so long a time were to occupy French singers,—the See also:ballade, the See also:rondeau, the See also:rondel, the See also:triolet, the See also:chant royal and others. These received considerable alterations as time went on. We possess not a few See also:Arles poeticae, such as that of Eustache See also:Deschamps at the end of the 14th century, that formerly ascribed to See also:Henri de Croy and now to See also:Molinet at the end of the 15th, and that of See also: He has See also:left us 8o,000 verses, never yet completely printed. Eustache Deschamps (c. 1340–c. 1410) was nearly as prolific, but more fortunate as more meritorious, the Societe See also:des anciens Textes having at last provided a complete edition of him. See also:Froissart the historian (1333–1410) was also an agreeable and prolific poet. Deschamps, the most famous as a poet of the three, has left us nearly 1200 ballades and nearly 200 rondeaux, besides much other verse all manifesting very considerable poetical See also:powers. Less known but not less noteworthy, and perhaps the earliest of all, is Jehannot de Lescurel, whose personality is obscure, and most of whose works are lost, but whose remains are full of grace. Froissart appears to have had many countrymen in Hainault and See also:Brabant who devoted themselves to the See also:art of versification; and the Livre des cent ballades of the See also:Marshal See also:Boucicault (1366–1421) and his friends—c. 1390—shows that the French See also:gentleman of the 14th century was as apt at the ballade as his Elizabethan peer in See also:England was at the See also:sonnet. Early Drama.—Before passing to the prose writers of the middle ages, we have to take some notice of the dramatic productions of those times—productions of an extremely interesting character, but, like the immense Mysteries See also:majority of medieval literature, poetic in form. The and miracles. origin or the revival of dramatic composition in France has been hotly debated, and it has been sometimes contended that the tradition of Latin comedy was never entirely lost, but was handed on chiefly in the convents by adaptations of the Terentian plays, such as those of the See also:nun Hroswitha. There is no doubt that the mysteries (subjects taken from the sacred writings) and See also:miracle plays (subjects taken from the legends of the See also:saints and the Virgin) are of very early date. The mystery of the Foolish Virgins (partly French, partly Latin), that of Adam and perhaps that of See also:Daniel, are of the 12th century, though due to unknown authors. Jean Bodel and Ruteboeuf, already mentioned, gave, the one that of Saint See also:Nicolas at the confines of the 12th and 13th, the other that of See also:Theophile later in the 13th itself. But the later moralities, soties, and farces seem to be also in part a very probable development of the simpler and earlier forms of the fabliau and of the tenson or jeuparti, a poem in simple dialogue much used by both troubadours
the characteristics of the See also:Renaissance, in Montaigne those of the sceptical reaction from Renaissance and reform alike, in See also:Moliere those of the society of France after See also:Richelieu had tamed and levelled it, in See also:Voltaire and See also: See also:Dante, in his De vulgari eloquio, acknowledges the excellence of the didactic writers of the Langue d'Oil. We have already alluded to the Bestiary of Philippe de Thaun, a See also:Norman trouvere who lived and wrote in England during the reign of Henry Beauclerc. Besides the Bestiary, which from its See also:dedication to Queen Adela has been conjectured to belong to the third See also:decade of the 12th century, Philippe wrote also in French a See also:Liber de creaturis, both works being translated from the Latin. These works of mystical and apocryphal physics and See also:zoology became extremely popular in the succeeding centuries, and were frequently imitated. A moralizing turn was also given to them, which was much helped by the importation of several miscellanies of Oriental origin, partly tales, partly didactic in character, the most celebrated of which is the Roman des See also:sept sages, which, under that title and the variant of Dolopathos, received repeated treatment from French writers both in prose and verse. The See also:odd notion of an Ovide moralise used to be ascribed to Philippe de Vitry, See also:bishop of See also:Meaux (1291?–1391?), a person complimented by See also:Petrarch, but is now assigned to a certain Chretien Legonais. Art, too, soon demanded exposition in verse, as well as science. The favourite pastime of the See also:chase was repeatedly dealt with, notably in the Roi Modus (1325), mixed prose and verse; the Deduits de la See also:chasse (1387), of Gaston de See also:Foix, prose; and the Tresor de Venerie of See also:Hardouin (1394), verse. Very soon didactic verse extended itself to all the arts and sciences. See also:Vegetius and his military precepts had found a See also:home in French octosyllables as early as the 12th century; the end of the same age saw the ceremonies of See also:knighthood solemnly versified, and napes (maps) du monde also soon appeared. At last, in 1245, Gautier of See also:Metz translated from various Latin works into French verse a sort of See also:encyclopaedia, while another, incongruous but known as L'lmage du monde, exists from the same century. Profane knowledge was not the only subject which exercised didactic poets at this time. Religious handbooks and commentaries on the scriptures were common in the 13th and following centuries, and, under the title of Castoiements, Enseignements and Doctrinaux, moral See also:treatises became common. The most famous of these, the Castoiement d'un pere a son fils, falls under the class, already mentioned, of works due to oriental influence, being derived from the See also:Indian Panchatantra. In the 14th century the influence of the Roman de la rose helped to render moral verse and trouveres. The fabliau has been sufficiently dealt with already. It chiefly supplied the subject; and some miracle-plays and farces are little more than fabliaux thrown into dialogue. Of the jeux-partis there are many examples, varying from very simple questions and answers to something like regular dramatic dialogue; even short romances, such as Aucassin et Nicolette, were easily susceptible of dramatization. But the Jeu de la feuillie (or feuillee) of Adam de la Halle seems to be the earliest piece, profane in subject, containing something more than mere dialogue. The poet has not indeed gone far for his subject, for he brings in his own wife, father and See also:friends, the interest being complicated by the introduction of stock characters (the See also:doctor, the monk, the See also:fool), and of certainfairies—personages already popular from the later romances of chivalry. Another piece of Adam's, Le Jeu de Robin et Marion, also already alluded to, is little more than a simple throwing into See also:action of an ordinary pastourelle with a considerable number of songs to music. Nevertheless later criticism has seen, and not unreasonably, in these two pieces the origin in the one case of farce, and thus indirectly of comedy proper, in the other of comic See also:opera. For a long time, however, the mystery and miracle-plays remained the See also:staple of theatrical performance, and until the 13th century actors as well as performers were more or less taken from the See also:clergy. It has, indeed, been well pointed out that the offices of the church were themselves dramatic performances, and required little more than development at the hands of the mystery writers. The occasional festive outbursts, such as the Feast of See also:Fools, that of the Boy Bishop and the rest, helped on the development. The variety of mysteries and miracles was very great. A single manuscript contains forty miracles of the Virgin, averaging from 1200 to 1500 lines each, written in octosyllabic couplets, and at least as old as the 14th century, most of them perhaps much earlier. The mysteries proper, or plays taken from the scriptures, are older still. Many of these are exceedingly long. There is a Mystere de l'Ancien Testament, which extends to many volumes, and must have taken See also:weeks to See also:act in its entirety. The Mystere de la See also:Passion, though not quite so long, took several days, and recounts the whole history of the gospels. The best apparently of the authors of these pieces, which are mostly anonymous, were two See also:brothers, Arnoul and See also:Simon Greban (authors of the Actes des apotres, and in the - first case of the Passion), c. 1450, while a certain Jean See also:Michel (d. 1493) is credited with having continued the Passion from 30,000 lines to 50,000. But these performances, though they held their ground until the middle of the 16th century and extended their range of subject from sacred to profane history—legendary as in the Destruction de Troie, contemporary as in the Siege d'Orleans—were soon rivalled by the more profane performances of the moralities, the farces and the soties. The palmy time of all these three kinds is the 15th century, while the Confrerie de la Passion itself, the special performers of the sacred drama, only obtained the licence constituting it by an See also:ordinance of Charles VI. in 1402. In See also:order, however, to take in the whole of the medieval See also:theatre at a glance, we may anticipate a little. The Confraternity was not itself the author or performer of the profaner kind of dramatic performance. This latter was due to two other bodies, the clerks of the Bazoche and the Enfans sans Souci. As the Confraternity was chiefly composed of tradesmen and persons very similar to See also:Peter See also:Quince and his associates, so the clerks of the Bazoche were members of the legal profession of Paris, and the Enfans sans Souci were mostly See also:young men of family. The morality was the special property of the first, the sotie of the second. But as the moralities were sometimes decidedly tedious plays, though by no means brief, they were varied by the introduction of farces, of which the jeux already mentioned were the early germ, and of which L'Avocat Patelin, dated by some about 1465 and certainly about 200 years subsequent to Adam de la Halle, is the most famous example. The morality was the natural result on the See also:stage of the immense literary popularity of allegory in the Roman de la rose and its imitations. There is hardly an abstraction, a virtue, a See also:vice, adisease, or anything else of the kind, which does not figure in these compositions. There is Bien Advise and Mal Advise, the good boy and the See also:bad boy of nursery stories, who fall Moralities. in respectively with Faith, See also:Reason and Humility, and with Rashness, Luxury and Folly. There is the hero Mange-Tout, who is invited to See also:dinner by Banquet, and meets after dinner very unpleasant See also:company in Colique, Goutte and Hydropisie. Honte-de-dire-ses-Peches might seem an anticipation of Puritan nomenclature to an English reader who did not re-member the contemporary or even earlier personae of Langland's poem. Some of these moralities possess distinct dramatic merit; among these is mentioned Les Blasphemateurs, an early and remarkable presentation of the See also:Don Juan story. But their general character appears to be gravity, not to say dullness. The Enfans sans Souci, on the other hand, were definitely satirical, and nothing if not amusing. The chief of the society was entitled Prince des Sots, and his See also:crown was a See also:hood decorated soties. with asses' ears. The sotie was directly satirical, and only assumed the See also:guise of folly as a stalking-horse for See also:shooting wit. It was more Aristophanic than any other modern form of comedy, and like its predecessor, it perished as a result of its political application. Encouraged for a moment as a political See also:engine at the beginning of the 16th century, it was soon absolutely forbidden and put down, and had to give place in one direction to the See also:lampoon and the prose pamphlet, in another to forms of comic satire more general and vague in their See also:scope. The farce, on the other hand, having neither moral purpose nor political intention, was a purer work of art, enjoyed a wider range of subject, and was in no danger of any permanent extinction. Farcical interludes were interpolated in the mysteries themselves; short farces introduced and rendered palatable the moralities, while the sotie was itself but a variety of farce, and all the kinds were sometimes combined in a sort of tetralogy. It was a short composition, 500 verses being considered sufficient, while the morality might run to at least l000 verses, the miracle-play to nearly See also:double that number, and the mystery to some 40,000 or 50,000, or indeed to any length that the author could find in his See also:heart to bestow upon the audience, or the audience in their See also:patience to suffer from the author. The number of persons and See also:societies who acted these performances grew to be very large, being estimated at more than 5000 towards the end of the 15th century. Many fantastic personages came to join the Prince des Sots, such as the Empereur de See also:Galilee, the Princes de 1'Etrille, and des Nouveaux Maries, the Roi de l'Epinette, the Recteur des Fous. Of the pieces which these societies represented one only, that of Maitre Patelin, is now much known; but many are almost equally amusing. Patelin itself has an immense number of versions and See also:editions. Other farces are too numerous to See also:attempt to classify; they bear, however, in their subjects, as in their manner, a remarkable resemblance to the fabliaux, their source. Conjugal disagreements, the unpleasantness of mothers-in-law, the shifty or, in the earlier stages, clumsy See also:valet and chambermaid, the mishaps of too loosely given ecclesiastics, the abuses of See also:relics and pardons, the See also:extortion, violence, and sometimes cowardice of the seigneur and the soldiery, the corruption of See also:justice, its delays and its pompous apparatus, supply the subjects. The treatment is rather narrative than dramatic in most cases, as might be expected, but makes up by the liveliness of the dialogue for the deficiency of elaborately planned action and interest. All these forms, it will be observed, are directly or indirectly comic. Tragedy in the middle ages is represented only by the religious drama, except for a brief period towards the decline of that form, when the. " profane " mysteries referred to above came to be represented. These were, however, rather " histories," in the Elizabethan sense, than tragedies proper. Prose History.—In France, as in all other countries of whose literary developments we have any See also:record, literature in prose is considerably later than literature in verse. We have certain glosses or vocabularies possibly dating as far chroa Early lcfes. back as the 8th or even the 7th century; we have the Strassburg oaths, already described, of the 9th, and .a. commentary Profane drama. an the See also:prophet See also:Jonas which is probably as early. In the loth century there are some charters and muniments in the verna- cular; of the firth the laws of William the Conqueror are the most important document; while the Assises de See also:Jerusalem of See also:Godfrey of See also:Bouillon date, though not in the form in which we now possess them, from the same age. The r2th century gives us certain See also:translations of the Scriptures, and the remarkable Arthurian romances already alluded to; and thenceforward French prose, though long less favoured than verse, begins to grow in importance. History, as is natural, was the first subject which gave it a really satisfactory opportunity of developing its powers. For a time the French chroniclers contented themselves with Latin prose or with French verse, after the See also:fashion of See also:Wace and the Belgian, Philippe Mouskes (1215—1283). These, after a fashion universal in medieval times, began from fabulous or merely literary_ origins, and just as See also:Wyntoun later carries back the history of See also:Scotland to the terrestrial paradise, so does Mouskes start that of France from the See also:rape of See also:Helen. But soon prose See also:chronicles, first translated, then original, became common; the earliest of all is said to have been that of the pseudo-Turpin, which thus recovered in prose the language which had originally clothed it in verse, and which, to gain a false See also:appearance of authenticity, it had exchanged still earlier for Latin. Then came French selections and versions from the great series of historical compositions undertaken by the monks of St Denys, the so-called Grandes Chroniques de France from the date of 1274, when they first took form in the hands of a monk styled Primat, to the reign of Charles V.,'when they assumed the title just given. But the first really remarkable author who used French prose as a vehicle of historical expression is Geoff roi de See also:Villehardouin, marshal of Champagne, who was born rather after the middle of the 12th century, and died in See also:Greece in 1212. Under the title of Conquete de Constanlinoble Villehardouin has left us a history Mk- of the fourth crusade, which has been accepted by all 6and rdouln. competent See also:judges as the best picture extant of feudal chivalry in its See also:prime. The Conquete de Constanlinoble has been well called a chanson de geste in prose, and indeed in the surprising nature of the feats it celebrates, in the abundance of detail, and in the vivid and picturesque poetry of the narration, it equals the very best of the chansons. Even the repetition of the same phrases which is characteristic of epic poetry repeats itself in this epic prose; and as in the chansons so in Villehardouin, few motives appear but religious fervour and the love of fighting, though neither of these excludes a lively appetite for See also:booty and a constant tendency to disunion and disorder. Villehardouin was continued by Henri de See also:Valenciennes, whose work is less remarkable, and has more the appearance of a rhymed chronicle thrown into prose, a See also:process which is known to have been actually applied in some cases. Nor is the transition from Villehardouin to Jean de See also:Joinville (considerable in point of time, for Joinville was not born till ten years after Villehardouin's death) in point of literary history immediate. The rhymed chronicles of Philippe Mouskes and Guillaume Guiart belong to this See also:interval; and in prose the most remarkable works are the Chronique de See also:Reims, a well-written history, having the interesting characteristics of taking the lay and popular side, and the great compilation edited (in the modern sense) by Baudouin d'See also:Avesnes (1213-1289). Joinville (? 1224—1317), whose special iOinrIlle, subject is the Life of St Louis, is far more modern than even the half-century which separates him from Villehardouin would lead us to suppose. There is nothing of the knight-errant about him personally, notwithstanding his devotion to his hero. Our Lady of the Broken Lances is far from being his favourite saint. He is an admirable writer, but far less simple than Villehardouin; the good King Louis tries in vain to make him See also:share his own rather high-flown devotion. Joinville is shrewd, practical, there is even a See also:touch of the Voltairean about him; but he, unlike his predecessor, has political ideas and antiquarian curiosity, and his descriptions are often very creditable pieces of deliberate literature. It is very remarkable that each of the three last centuries of See also:feudalism should have had one specially and extraordinarilygifted chronicler to describe it. What Villehardouin is to the 12th and Joinville to the 13th century, that Jean Froissart (1337—1410) is to the 14th. His picture is the most famous as it is the most varied of the three, but it has Froissart. special drawbacks as well as special merits. French critics have indeed been scarcely See also:fair to Froissart, because of his early partiality to our own nation in the great quarrel of the time, forgetting that there was really no reason why he as a Hainaulter should take the French side. But there is no doubt that if the duty of an historian is to take in all the political problems of his time, Froissart certainly comes short of it. Although the feudal state in which knights and churchmen were alone of estimation was at the point of death, and though new orders of society were becoming important, though the See also:distress and confusion of a transition state were evident to all, Froissart takes no notice of them. Society is still to him all knights and ladies, tournaments, skirmishes and feasts. He depicts these, not like Joinville, still less like Villehardouin, as a sharer in them, but with the facile and picturesque See also:pen of a sympathizing literary onlooker. As the comparison of the Conquete de Constantinoble with a chanson de geste is inevitable, so is that of Froissart's Chronique with a roman d'aventures. For Provencal Literature see the separate article under that heading. 25th Century. The 15th century holds a See also:peculiar and some-what disputed position in the history of French literature, as, indeed, it does in the history of the literature of all Europe, except Italy. It has sometimes been regarded as the final stage of the medieval period, sometimes as the earliest of the modern, the influence of the Renaissance in Italy already filtering through. Others again have taken the easy step of marking it as an age of transition. There is as usual truth in all these views. Feudality died with Froissart and Eustache Deschamps. The modern spirit can hardly be said to arise before Rabelais and See also:Ronsard. Yet the 15th century, from the point of view of French literature, is much more remarkable than its historians have been wont to confess. It has not the strongly marked and compact originality of some periods, and it furnishes only one name of the highest order of literary interest; but it abounds in names of the second rank, and the very difference which exists between their styles and characters testifies to the existence of a large number of separate forces working in their different manners on different persons. Its theatre we have already treated by anticipation, and to it we shall afterwards recur. It was the palmy time of the early French stage, and all the dramatic styles"which we have enumerated then came to perfection. Of no other kind of literature can the same be said. The century which witnessed the invention of See also:printing naturally devoted itself at first more to the spreading of old literature than to the production of new. Yet as it perfected the early drama, so it produced the prose tale. Nor, as regards individual and single names, can the century of Charles d'Orleans, of Alain See also:Chartier, of Christine de See also:Pisan, of Coquillart, of See also:Comines, and, above all, of Villon, be said to lack illustrations. First among the poets of the period falls to be mentioned the shadowy personality of See also:Olivier See also:Basselin. Modern criticism has attacked the identity of the jovial See also:miller, who See also:Christina was once supposed to have written and perhaps & pis". invented the songs called See also:vaux de See also:vire, and to have also carried on a patriotic warfare against the English. But though Jean le Houx may have written the poems published under Basselin's name two centuries later, it is taken as certain that an actual Olivier wrote actual vaux de vire at the beginning of the 15th century. About Christine de Pisan (1363—1430) and Alain Chartier (1392-c. 1430) there is no such doubt. Christine was the daughter of an Italian astrologer who was patronized by Charles V. She was born in Italy but brought up in France, and she enriched the literature of her adopted country Alain with much learning, good sense and patriotism. She c artier. wrote history, devotional works and poetry; and though her literary merit is not of the highest, it is very far from despicable. Alain Chartier, best known to modern readers by the story of See also:Margaret of Scotland's See also:Kiss, was a writer of a some- what similar character. In both Christine and Chartier there is a great deal of rather heavy moralizing, and a great deal of rather pedantic erudition. But it is only fair to remember that the intolerable political and social evils of the day called for a good deal of moralizing, and that it was the See also:function of the writers of this time to fill up as well as they could the scantily filled vessels of medieval science and learning. A very different person is Charles d'Orleans (1391-1465), one of the Charles a,o greatest of grands seigneurs, for he was the father r~aas. of a king of France, and See also:heir to the duchies of Orleans and See also:Milan. Charles, indeed, if not a Roland or a See also:Bayard, was an admirable poet. He is the best-known and perhaps the best writer of the graceful poems in which an artificial versification is strictly observed, and helps by its recurrent lines and modulated rhymes to give to poetry something of a musical See also:accompaniment even without the addition of music properly so called. His ballades are certainly inferior to those of Villon, but his rondels are unequalled. For fully a century and a half these forms engrossed the attention of French lyrical poets. Exercises in them were produced in enormous numbers, and of an excellence which has only recently obtained full recognition even in France. Charles d'Orleans is himself sufficient proof of what can be done in them in the way of elegance, sweetness, and grace which some have unjustly called effeminacy. But that this effeminacy was no natural or inevitable See also:fault of the ballades and the rondeaux was fully proved by the most remarkable literary figure of the 15th century in France. To Francois Villon (1431–1463 ?), Viilon. as to other great single writers, no attempt can be made to do justice in this place. His remarkable life and character especially lie outside our subject. But he is universally recognized as the most important single figure of French literature before the Renaissance. His work is very strange in form, the undoubtedly genuine part of it consisting merely of two compositions, known as the great and little Testament, written in stanzas of eight lines of eight syllables each, with lyrical compositions in ballade and rondeau form interspersed. Nothing in old French literature can compare with the best of these, such as the " Ballade des dames du temps jadis," the "Ballade pour sa mere," "La See also:Grosse Margot," " Les Regrets de la belle Heaulmiere," and others; while the whole composition is full of poetical traits of the most extra-ordinary vigour, picturesqueness and pathos. Towards the end of the century the poetical production of the time became very large. The artificial See also:measures already alluded to, and others far more artificial and infinitely less beautiful, were largely practised. The typical poet of the end of the 15th century is Guillaume Cretin (d. 1525), who distinguished himself by writing verses with punning rhymes, verses ending with double or See also:treble repetitions of the same sound, and many other tasteless absurdities, in which, as See also:Pasquier remarks, " it perdit toute la grace et la cretin, liberte de la composition." The other favourite direction of the poetry of the time was a vein of allegorical moralizing drawn from the Roman de la rose through the medium of Chartier and Christine, which produced " Castles of Love,"" Temples of Honour,"and such like. The See also:combination of these drifts in verse-writing produced a school known in literary history, from a happy phrase of the satirist Coquillart (v. inf.) ,as the " Grands Rhetoriqueurs." The chief of these besides Cretin were Jean Molinet (d. 1507); Jean Meschinot (c. 1420-1491), author of the Lunettes des princes; Florimond Robertet (d. 1522); Georges See also:Chastellain (1404-1475), to be mentioned again; and Octavien de Saint-Gelais (1466-1502), father of a better poet than himself. Yet some of the See also:minor poets of the time are not to be despised. Such are Henri Baude (143x'1490), a less pedantic writer than most, Martial d'See also:Auvergne (1440-1508), whose principal work is L'Amant rendu cordelier au service de l'amour, and others, many of whom formed part of the poetical court which Charles d'Orleans kept up at Blois after his See also:release. While the serious poetry of the age took this turn, there was no lack of lighter and satirical verse. Villon, indeed, were it not for the See also:depth and pathos of his poetical sentiment, mightbe claimed as a poet of the lighter order, and the patriotic diatribes against the English to which we have alluded easily passed into satire. The political quarrels of the latter part of the century also provoked much satirical composition. The disputes of the Bien Public and those between Louis XI. and Charles of See also:Burgundy employed many pens. The most remark-able piece of the light literature of the first is " Les Anes Volants," a ballad on some of the early favourites of Louis. The battles of France and Burgundy were waged on See also:paper between Gilles des Ormes and the above-named Georges Chastelain, typical representatives of the two styles of 15th-century poetry already alluded to—Des Ormes being the lighter and more graceful writer, Chastelain a pompous and learned allegorist. The most remarkable representative of purely light poetry outside the theatre is Guillaume Coquillart (1421-1510), a lawyer of Champagne, who resided for the greater part of his coqui--lart. life in Reims. This city, like others, suffered from the pitiless tyranny of Louis XI. The beginnings of the See also:standing See also:army which Charles VII. had started were extremely unpopular, and the use to which his son put them by no means removed this unpopularity. Coquillart described the military man of the period in his See also:Monologue du gendarme casse. Again, when the king entertained the idea of unifying the taxes and laws of the different provinces, Coquillart, who was named See also:commissioner for this purpose, wrote on the occasion a satire called Les Droits nouveaux. A certain kind of satire, much less good-tempered than the earlier forms, became indeed common at this See also:epoch. M. Lenient has well pointed out that a new satirical personification dominates this literature. It is no longer Renart with his cynical gaiety, or the curiously travestied and almost amiable Devil of the Middle Ages. Now it is Death as an incident ever present to the See also:imagination, celebrated in the thousand repetitions of the Danse See also:Macabre, sculptured all over the buildings of the time, even frequently performed on holidays and in public. With the usual tendency to follow See also:pattern, the idea of the " See also:dance " seems to have been extended, and we have a Danse aux aveugles (1464) from Pierre Micha.ut, where the teachers are See also:fortune, love and death, all See also:blind. All through the century, too, anonymous verse of the lighter kind was written, some of it of great merit. The folk-songs already alluded to, published by Gaston Paris, show one side of this composition, and many of the pieces contained in M. de Montaiglon's extensive Recueil des anciennes poesies francaises exhibit others. The 15th century was perhaps more remarkable for its achievements in prose than in poetry. It produced, indeed, no prose writer of great distinction, except Comines; but it witnessed serious, if not extremely successful, efforts at prose composition. The invention of printing finally substituted the reader for the listener, and when this substitution has been effected, the main inducement to treat unsuitable subjects in verse is gone. The study of the See also:classics at first hand contributed to the same end. As early as 1458 the university of Paris had a See also:Greek See also:professor. But long before this time translations in prose had been made. Pierre Bercheure (Bersuire) (1290--1352) had already translated See also:Livy. See also:Nicholas See also:Oresme (c. 1334-1382), the See also:tutor of Charles V., gave a version of certain Aristotelian works, which enriched the language with a large number of terms, then strange enough, now See also:familiar. Raoul de Presles (1316–1383) turned into French the De civitate Dei of St See also:Augustine. These writers or others composed Le Songe du vergier, an elaborate discussion of the power of the pope. The famous See also:chancellor, Jean Charlier or See also:Gerson (1363-1429), to whom the Imitation has among so many others been attributed, spoke. constantly and wrote often in the vulgar tongue, though he attacked the most famous and popular work in that tongue,'the Roman de la rose. Christine de Pisan , and Alain Chartier were at least as much prose writers as poets; and the latter, while he, like Gerson, dealt much with the reform of the church, used in his Quadriloge invectif really forcible language for the purpose of spurring on the nobles of France to put an end to her sufferings and evils. These moral and didactic treatises were but continuations of others, which for convenience sake we have hitherto left unnoticed. Though verse was in the centuries prior to the 15th the favourite medium for literary composition, it was by no means the only one; and moral and educational treatises—some referred toabove—already existed in pedestrian phrase. Certain See also:household books (Livres de raison) have been preserved, some of which date as far back as the 13th century. These contain not merely accounts, but family chronicles, receipts and the like. Accounts of travel, especially to the Holy Land, culminated in the famous Voyage of See also:Mandeville which, though it has never been of so much importance in French as in English, perhaps first took vernacular form in the French tongue. Of the 14th century, we have a Menagier de Paris, intended for the instruction of a young wife, and a large number of miscellaneous treatises of art, science and morality, while private letters, mostly as yet unpublished, exist in considerable numbers, and are generally of the moralizing character; books of devotion, too, are naturally frequent. But the most important divisions of medieval See also:energy in prose composition are the spoken exercises of the See also:pulpit and the See also:bar. The beginnings of French sermons have been much discussed, especially the question whether St See also:Bernard, whose discourses we possess in ancient, but doubtfully contemporary French, pronounced them in that language or in Latin. Towards the end of the 12th century, however, the sermons of See also:Maurice de Sully (1160-1196) present the first undoubted examples of See also:homiletics in the vernacular, and they are followed by many others—so many indeed that the 13th century alone See also:counts 261 See also:sermon-writers, besides a large body of anonymous work. These sermons were, as might indeed be expected, chiefly cast in a somewhat scholastic form—theme, exordium, development, example and peroration following in regular order. The 14th-century sermons, on the other hand, have as yet been little investigated. It must, however, be remembered that this age was the most famous of all for its scholastic illustrations, and for the early vigour of the Dominican and Franciscan orders. With the end of the century and the beginning of the 15th, the importance of the pulpit begins to revive. The early years of the new age have Gerson for their representative, while the end of the century See also:sees the still more famous names cf Michel Menot (1450-1518), Olivier Maillard (c. 1430-1502), and Jean Rauhn (1443-1514), all remarkable for the practice of a vigorous and homely style of See also:oratory, recoil- See also:ing before no aid of what we should nowadays style buffoonery, and manifesting a creditable indifference to the indignation of principalities and powers. Louis XI. is said to have threatened to throw Maillard into the See also:Seine, and many instances of the bold- ness of these preachers and the rough vigour of their oratory have been preserved. Froissart had been followed as a chronicler by Enguerrand de See also:Monstrelet (c. 1390-1453) and by the historio- graphers of the Burgundian court, Chastelain, already mentioned, whole interesting Chronique de Jacques de See also:Lalaing is much the most attractive part of his work, and Olivier de la See also:Marche. The memoir and chronicle writers, who were to be of so much import- ance in French literature, also begin to be numerous at this period. See also:Juvenal des,See also:Ursins (1388-1473) , an anonymous bourgeois de Paris (two such indeed), and the author of the Chronique scandaleuse, may be mentioned as presenting the character of minute observation and record which has distinguished the class ever since. Jean le maire de (not des) Belges (1473-c. 1525) was historiographer to Louis XII. and wrote Illustrations des Gaules. But Comines (1445-1509) is no imitator of Froissart Comines. _ or of any one else. The last of the quartette of great French medieval historians, he does not yield to any of his three predecessors in originality or merit, but he is very different from them. He fully represents the See also:mania of the time for statecraft, and his book has long ranked with that of See also:Machiavelli as a See also:manual of the art, though he has not the absolutely non-moral character of the Italian. His See also:memoirs, considered merely as literature, show a style well suited to their purport,—not, indeed, brilliant or picturesque, but clear, terse and thoroughly well suited to the expression of the acuteness, observation and common sense of their author. But pcpse was not content with the domain of serious literature.It had already long possessed a respectable position as a vehicle of romance, and the end of the 14th and the beginning of the 15th centuries were pre-eminently the time when the epics of chivalry were re-edited and extended in Nouvelle, The cent prose. Few, however, of these extensions offer much Nouvelle,. literary interest. On the other hand, the best prose of the century, and almost the earliest which deserves the title of a satisfactory literary medium, was employed for the telling of romances in See also:miniature. The Cent Nouvelles Nouvelles is undoubtedly the first work of prose belles-lettres in French, and the first, moreover, of a long and most remarkable class of literary work in which French writers may See also:challenge all corners with the certainty of victory—the short prose tale of a comic character. This remarkable work has usually been attributed, like the somewhat similar but later Heptameron, to a See also:knot of literary courtiers gathered round a royal personage, in this case the dauphin Louis, afterwards Louis XI. Some evidence has recently been produced which seems to show that this tradition, which attributed some of the tales to Louis himself, is erroneous, but the question is still undecided. The subjects of the Cent Nouvelles Nouvelles are by no means new. They are simply the old themes of the fabliaux treated in the old way. The novelty is in the application of prose to such a purpose, and in the crispness, the fluency and the elegance of the prose used. The fortunate author or editor to whom these admirable tales have of late been attributed is Antoine de la Salle (1398-1461), who, if this attribution and certain others be correct, must be allowed to be one of the most original and fertile authors of early French literature. La Salle's one acknowledged work is the story of See also:Petit Jehan de Saintre, a short romance exhibiting great command of character and abundance of delicate draughtsmanship. To this not only the authorship, part-authorship or editorship of the Cent Nouvelles Nouvelles has been added; but the still more famous and important work of L'Avocat Patelin has been assigned by respectable, though of course conjecturing, authority to the same paternity. The generosity of critics towards La Salle has not even stopped here. A fourth masterpiece of the period, Les Quinze Joies de mariage, has also been assigned to him. This last work, like the other three, is satirical in subject, and shows for the time a•wonderful mastery of the language. Of the fifteen joys of See also:marriage, or, in other words, the fifteen miseries of husbands, each has a See also:chapter assigned to it, and each is treated with the peculiar mixture of gravity and ridicule which it requires. All who have read the book confess its See also:infinite wit and the grace of its style. It is true that it has been reproached with See also:cruelty and with a lack of the moral sentiment. But humanity and morality were not the strong point of the 15th century. There is, it must be admitted, about most of its productions a lack of poetry and a lack of imagination, produced, it may be, partly by political and other conditions outside literature, but very observable in it. The old forms of literature itself had lost their interest, and new ones possessing influence strength to last and power to develop themselves of the had not yet appeared. It was impossible, even if the Rena Is-taste for it had survived, to spin out the old themes See also:sauce. any longer. But the new forces required some time to set to work, and to avail themselves of the tremendous weapon which the See also:press had put into their hands. When these things had adjusted themselves, literature of a varied and vigorous kind became once more possible and indeed necessary, nor did it take long to make its appearance. 26th Century.—In no country was the literary result of the Renaissance more striking and more manifold than in France. The double effect of the study of antiquity and the religious See also:movement produced an outburst of literary developments of the most diverse kinds, which even the fierce and sanguinary See also:civil dissensions of the See also:Reformation did not succeed in checking. While the Renaissance in Italy had mainly exhausted its effects by the middle of the 16th century, while in Germany those effects only paved the way for a national literature, and did not them selves greatly contribute thereto, while in England it was not Early sermon-writers. Antoine de la Salle. till the extreme end of „..c period that a great literature was forthcoming—in France almost the whole century was marked by the production of See also:capital works in every branch of literary effort. Not even the 17th century, and certainly not the 18th, can show such a group of prose writers and poets as is formed by See also:Calvin, St See also:Francis de Sales, Montaigne, du Vair, See also:Bodin, d'See also:Aubigne, the authors of the Satire Menippee, See also:Monluc, Brant6me, Pasquier, Rabelais, des Periers, Herberay des Essarts, See also:Amyot, Gamier, Marot, Ronsard and the rest of the " Pleiades” and finally See also:Regnier. These great writers are not merely remark-able for the vigour and originality of their thoughts, the freshness, variety and grace of their fancy, the abundance of their learning and the solidity of their arguments in the cases where argument is required. Their great merit is the creation of a language and a style able to give expression to these good gifts. The foregoing account of the medieval literature of France will have shown sufficiently that it is not lawful to despise the literary capacities and achievements of the older French. But the old language, with all its merits, was ill-suited to be a vehicle for any but the simpler forms of literary composition. Pleasant or affecting tales could be told in it with interest and pathos. Songs of charming naivete and grace could be sung; the requirements of the epic and the chronicle were suitably furnished. But it was barren of the terms of art and science; it did not readily lend itself to sustained eloquence, to impassioned poetry or to logical discussion. It had been too long accustomed to leave these things to Latin as their natural and legitimate exponent, and it See also:bore marks of its original character as a lingua rustica, a tongue suited for homely conversation, for folk-See also:lore and for See also:ballads, rather than for the business of the See also:forum and the court, the speculations of the study, and the declamation of the theatre. Efforts had indeed been made, culminating in the heavy and tasteless erudition of the schools of Chartier and Cretin, to supply the defect; but it was reserved for the 16th century completely to efface it. The series of prose writers from Calvin to Montaigne, of poets from Marot to Regnier, elaborated a language yielding to no modern tongue in beauty, richness, flexibility and strength, a language which the reactionary purism of succeeding generations defaced rather than improved, and the merits of which have in still later days been triumphantly vindicated by the See also:confession and the practice of all the greatest writers of modern France. 16th-Century Poetry.—The first few years of the 16th century were naturally occupied rather with the last developments of the medieval forms than with the production of the new model. The clerks of the Bazoche and the Confraternity of the Passion still produced and acted mysteries, moralities and farces. The poets of the " Grands Rhetoriqueurs " school still wrote elaborate allegorical poetry. Chansons de geste, rhymed romances and fabliaux had long ceased to be written. But the press was multiplying the contents of the former in the prose form which they had finally assumed, and in the Cent Nouvelles Nouvelles there already existed admirable specimens of the short prose tale. There even were signs, as in some writers already mentioned and in See also:Roger de Collerye, a lackpenny but light-hearted See also:singer of the early part of the century, of definite enfranchisement in verse. But the first See also:note of the new literature was sounded by Maros See also:Clement Marot (1496/7-1544). The son of an See also:elder poet, Jehan des Mares called Marot (1463-1523), Clement at first wrote, like his father's contemporaries, allegorical and mythological poetry, afterwards collected in a volume with a charming title, L' See also:Adolescence clementine. It was not till he was nearly See also:thirty years old that his work became really remarkable. From that time forward till his death, about twenty years after-wards, he was much involved in the troubles and persecutions of the Huguenot party to which he belonged; nor was the See also:protection of See also:Marguerite d'See also:Angouleme, the chief patroness of See also:Huguenots and men of letters, always efficient. But his troubles, so far from harming, helped his literary faculties; and his epistles, epigrams, blasons (descendants of the medieval dits), and coq_-dl'dne became remarkable for their easy and polished style, their light and graceful wit, and a certain elegance which had not as yet been even attempted in any modern tongue, though the Italian humanists had not been far from it in so ae of their Latin compositions. Around Marot arose a wb*e school of disciples and imitators, such as See also:Victor Brodeau (1470?-1540), the great authority on rondeaux, Maurice See also:Sceve, a fertile author of blasons, Salel, Marguerite herself (1492-1549), of whom more hereafter, and Mellin de Saint Gelais (1491-1558). The last, son of the bishop named above, is a courtly writer of occasional pieces, who sustained as well as he could the style marotique against Ronsard, and who has the See also:credit of introducing the regular sonnet into French. But the inventive vigour of the age was so great that one school had hardly become popular before another pushed it from its See also:stool, and even of the Marotists just mentioned Sceve and Salel are often regarded as chief and member respectively of a Lyonnese coterie, intermediate between the schools of Marot and of Ronsard, containing other members of repute such as Antoine Hemet and Charles See also:Fontaine and claiming See also:Louise See also:Labe (v. inf.) herself. Pierre de Ronsard. Ronsard (x524-1585) was the chief of this latter. At first a courtier and a diplomatist, See also:physical disqualification made him change his career. He began to study the classics under Jean See also:Daurat (1508-1588), and with his See also:master and five other writers, See also:Etienne See also:Jodelle (1532-1573), Remy See also:Belleau (1528-1577), See also:Joachim du Bellay (1525-1560), Jean Antoine de BaIf (1532-1589), and See also:Pontus de Tyard (d. 1605, bishop of See also:Ch3.lons-sur-Sa6ne), composed the famous " Pleiade." The See also:object of this See also:band was to bring the French language, in vocabulary, The constructions and application, on a level with the See also:pleiad, classical See also:tongues by borrowings from the latter. They would have imported the Greek licence of See also:compound words, though the See also:genius of the French language is but little adapted thereto; and they wished to reproduce in French the regular tragedy, the Pindaric and Horatian See also:ode, the Virgilian epic, &c. But it is an See also:error (though one which until recently was very common, and which perhaps requires pretty thorough study of their work completely to extirpate it) to suppose that they advocated or practised indiscriminate borrowing. On the contrary both in du Bella.y's famous manifesto, the De5ense et See also:illustration de la langue francaise, and in Ronsard's own work, caution and attention to the genius and the tradition of French are insisted upon. Being all men of the highest See also:talent, and not a few of them men of great genius, they achieved much that they designed, and even where they failed exactly to achieve it, they very often indirectly produced results as important and more beneficial than those which they intended. Their ideal of a separate poetical language distinct from that intended for prose use was indeed a doubtful if not a dangerous one. But it is certain that Marot, while setting an example of elegance and grace not easily to be imitated, set also an example of trivial and, so to speak, pedestrian language which was only too imitable. If France was ever to possess a literature containing something besides fabliaux and farces, the tongue must be enriched and strengthened. This See also:accession of See also:wealth and vigour it received from Ronsard and the Ronsardists. Doubtless they went too far and provoked to some extent the reaction which See also:Malherbe led. Their importations were sometimes unnecessary. It is almost impossible to read the Franciade of Ronsard, and not too easy to read the tragedies of Jodelle and Gamier, See also:fine as the latter are in parts. But the best of Ronsard's sonnets and odes, the finest of du Bellay's Antiquites de Rome (translated into English by See also:Spenser), the exquisite Vanneur of the same author, and the Avril of Belleau, even the finer passages of d'Aubigne and du Bartas, are not only admirable in themselves, and of a kind not previously found in French literature, but are also such things as could not have been previously found, for the simple reason that the medium of expression was wanting. They constructed that medium for themselves, and no force of the reaction which they provoked was able to undo their work. Adverse criticism and the natural course of time rejected much that they had added. The charming diminutives they loved so much went out of fashion; their compounds (sometimes it must be confessed, justly) had their letters of See also:naturalization promptly cancelled; many a gorgeous See also:adjective, including some which could trace their See also:pedigree to the earliest ages of French literature, but which bore an unfortunate likeness to the new-corners, was proscribed. But for all that no language has ever had its destiny influenced more powerfully and more beneficially by a small literary clique than the language of France was influenced by the example and disciples of that Ronsard whom for two centuries it was the fashion to deride and decry. In a See also:sketch such as the present it is impossible to give a separate account of individual writers, the more important of whom will be found treated under their own names. The Ron. The effort of the " Pleiade " proper was continued and shared by a considerable number of minor poets, some of them, as has been. already noted, belonging to different groups and schools. Olivier de See also:Magny (d. 1560) and Louise Labe (b. 1526) were poets and lovers, the lady deserving far the higher rank in literature. There is more depth of passion in the writings of " La Belle Cordiere," as this Lyonnese poetess was called, than in almost any of her contemporaries. Jacques Tahureau (1527-1555) scarcely deserves to be called a minor poet. There is less than the usual See also:hyperbole in the contemporary comparison of him to See also:Catullus, and he reminds an Englishman of the school represented nearly a century later by See also:Carew, See also:Randolph and Suckling. The title of a part of his poem— Mignardises amoureuses de l'admiree—is characteristic both of the style and of the time. Jean Doublet (c. 1528-c.1580), Amadis Jamyn (c. 1530-1585), and Jean de la See also:Taille (154o-16o8) deserve mention at least as poets, but two other writers require a longer allusion. Guillaume de Salluste, seigneur du Bartas (1544-1590), whom See also:Sylvester's See also:translation, See also:Milton's imitation, and DO B'' the copious citations of See also:Southey's Doctor, have made known if not familiar in England, was partly a See also:disciple and partly a rival of Ronsard. His poem of See also:Judith was eclipsed by his better-known La Divine Sepmaine or epic of the Creation. Du Bartas was a great user and abuser of the double compounds alluded to above, but his style possesses much stateliness, and has a peculiar solemn eloquence which he shared with the other French Calvinists, and which was derived from the study partly of Calvin and partly of the Bible. See also:Theodore See also:Agrippa d'Aubigne (15J2-1630), like du Bartas, was a Calvinist. His and odes as became a Ronsardist, but his chief poetical work is the satirical poem of Les Tragiques, in which the author brands the factions, corruptions and persecutions of the time, and in which there are to be found alexandrines of a strength, vigour and original See also:cadence hardly to be discovered elsewhere, See also:save in See also:Corneille and Victor See also:Hugo. Towards the end of the century, Philippe See also:Desportes (1546-2606) and Jean See also:Bertaut (1552-1611), with much enfeebled strength, but with a certain grace, continue the Ronsardizing tradition. Among their See also:con-temporaries must be noticed Jean See also:Passerat (1534-1602), a writer of much wit and vigour and rather resembling Marot than Ronsard, and See also:Vauquelin de la Fresnaye (1536-1607), the author of a valuable Ars poetica and of the first French satires which actually bear that title. Jean le Houx (fl. c. r600) continued, rewrote or invented the vaux de vire, commonly known as the work of Olivier Basselin, and already alluded to, while a still lighter and more See also:eccentric verse style was cultivated by Etienne Tabourot des Accords (1549-1590), whose epigrams and other pieces were collected under odd titles, Les Bigarrures, Les Touches, &c. A curious pair are Guy du Faur de See also:Pibrac (1529-1584) and Pierre Mathieu (b. 1563), authors of moral quatrains, which were learnt by heart in the schools of the time, replacing the distichs of the grammarian See also:Cato, which, translated into French, had served the same purpose in the middle ages. The See also:nephew of Desportes, Mathurin Regnier (1573-1613), marks the end, and at the same time perhaps the See also:climax, of the. Regnier. poetry of the century. A descendant at once of the older Gallic spirit of Villon and Marot, in virtue of his consummate acuteness, terseness and wit, of the school of Ronsard by his erudition, his command of language, and his scholarship, Regnier is perhaps the best representative of French poetry at the See also:critical time when it had got together all its materials, had lost none of its native vigour and force, and had not yet submitted to the cramping and numbing rules and restrictions which the next century introduced. The satirical poems of Regnier, and especially the admirable See also:epistle to See also:Rapin, in which he denounces and rebuts the critical dogmas of Malherbe, are models of See also:nervous strength, while some of the elegies and odes contain expression not easily to be surpassed of the softer feelings of affection and regret. No poet has had more influence on the revival of French poetry in the last century than Regnier, and he had imitators in his own time, the chief of whom was Courval-Sonnet (Thomas Sonnet, sieur de Courval) (1577-1635), author of satires of some value for the history of manners. 16th-Century Drama.—The change which dramatic poetry underwent during the 16th century was at least as remarkable as that undergone by poetry proper. The first half of the period saw the end of the religious mysteries, the licence of which had irritated both the See also:parliament and the clergy. Louis XII., at the beginning of the century, was far from discouraging the disorderly but popular and powerful theatre in which the Confraternity of the Passion, the clerks of the Bazoche, and the Enfans sans souci enacted mysteries, moralities, soties and farces. He made them, indeed, an instrument in his quarrel with the papacy, just as Philippe le Bel had made use of the allegorical poems of Jehan de Meung and his fellows. Under his patronage were produced the chief works of Gringore or See also:Gringoire (c. 1480-1547), by far the most remarkable writer of this class of composition. His Prince des sots and his Mystere de St Louis are among the best of their kind. An enormous volume of composition of this class was produced between 1500 and 1550. One morality by itself, L'Homme juste et l'homme mondain, contains some 36,000 lines. But in 1548, when the Confraternity was formally established at the Hotel de Bourgogne, leave to play sacred subjects was expressly refused it. Moralities and soties dragged on under difficulties till the end of the century, and the farce, which is immortal, continually affected comedy. But the effect of the Renaissance was to sweep away all other vestiges of the medieval drama, at least in the capital. An entirely new class of subjects, entirely new modes of treatment, and a different kind of performers were introduced. The change naturally came from Italy. In the close relationship with that country which France had during the early years of the century, Italian translations of the classical masterpieces were easily imported. Soon French translations were made afresh of the See also:Electra, the See also:Hecuba, the Iphigenia in See also:Aulis, and the French humanists hastened to compose original tragedies on the classical model, especially as exhibited in the Latin tragedian See also:Seneca. It was impossible that the " Pleiade " should not eagerly seize such an opportunity of carrying out its principles, and one of its members, Jodelle (1532-1573), devoting himself mainly to dramatic composition, fashioned at once the first tragedy, Regular Cleopatre, and the first comedy, See also:Eugene, thus setting tragedy the example of the style of composition which for two and
centuries and a half Frenchmen were to regard as the comedy. highest effort of literary ambition. The See also:amateur performance of these dramas by Jodelle and his friends was followed by a Bacchic procession after the manner of the ancients, which caused a great deal of See also:scandal, and was represented by both Catholics and Protestants as a See also:pagan See also:orgy. The Cleop6tre is remarkable as being the first French tragedy, nor is it destitute of merit. It is curious that in this first instance the curt antithetic
r nxoµvOLa, which was so long characteristic of French plays and plays imitated from them, and which See also: There appears also the grandiose and smooth but See also:stilted declamation which came rather from the imitation of Seneca than of See also:Sophocles, and the tradition of which was never to be lost. Cleopdtre was followed by See also:Didon, which, unlike its predecessor, is entirely in alexandrines, and observes the regular See also:alternation of masculine and feminine rhymes. Jodelle was followed by Jacques See also:Grevin (1540?-1570) with a Mort de Cesar, which shows an improvement in tragic art, and two still better comedies, Les Ebahis and La Tresoriere by Jean de la Taille (154o-1608), who made still further progress tYAu- gemus was of a more varied character. He wrote sonnets bigne. towards the accepted French dramatic pattern in his See also:Saul furieux and his Corrivaux, Jacques, his brother (1541-1562), and Jean de la Peruse (1529-1554), who wrote a Medee. A very Daimler. different poet from all these is Robert Gamier (1545- 160r). Gamier is the first tragedian who deserves a place not too far below See also:Rotrou, Corneille, See also:Racine, Voltaire and Hugo, and who may be placed in the same class with them. He See also:chose his subjects indifferently from classical, sacred and medieval lit See also:erature. Sedecie, a play dealing with the See also:capture of Jerusalem by Nebuchadnezzar, is held to be his masterpiece, and Bradamante deserves notice because it is the first tragi-comedy of merit in French, and because the famous confidant here makes his first appearance. See also:Garnier's successor, Antoine de Monchretien or Montchrestien (c. 1576-1621), set the example of dramatizing contemporary subjects. His masterpiece is L'E°cossaise, the first of many dramas on the See also:fate of See also:Mary, queen of Scots. While tragedy thus clings closely to See also:antique models, comedy, as might be expected in the country of the fabliaux, is more independent. Italy had already a comic school of some originality, and the French farce was too vigorous and lively a production to permit of its being entirely overlooked. The first comic writer of great LVeY, merit was Pierre See also:Larivey (c. 1550-c. 1612), an Italian by descent. Most if not all of his plays are founded on Italian originals, but the translations or adaptations are made with the greatest freedom, and almost deserve the title of original works. The style is admirable, and the skilful management of the action contrasts strongly with the languor, the awkward See also:adjustment, and the lack of dramatic interest found in con-temporary tragedians. Even Moliere found something to use in Larivey. 16th-Century Prose Fiction.—Great as is the importance of the 16th century in the history of French poetry, its importance in the history of French prose is greater still. In poetry the middle ages could fairly hold their own with any of the ages that have succeeded them. The epics of chivalry, whether of the cycles of Charlemagne, Arthur, or the classic heroes, not to mention the miscellaneous romans d'aventures, have indeed more than held their own. Both relatively and absolutely the Franciade of the 16th century, the Pucelle of the 17th, the Henriade of the 18th, cut a very poor figure beside Roland and Percivale, Gerard de Roussillon, and Parthenopex de Blois. The romances, ballads and pastourelles, signed and unsigned, of medieval France were not merely the origin, but in some respects the superiors, of the lyric poetry which succeeded them. Thibaut de Champagne, Charles d'Orleans and Villon need not See also:veil their crests in any society of bards. The charming forms of the rondel, the rondeau and the ballade have won admiration from every competent poet and critic who has known them. The fabliaux give something more than promise of La Fontaine, and the two great compositions of the Roman du Renart and the Roman de la rose, despite their faults and their alloy, will always command the admiration of all persons of taste and See also:judgment who take the trouble to study them. But while poetry had in the middle ages no reason to blush for her French representatives, prose (always the younger and less forward See also:sister) had far less to boast of. With the exception of chronicles and prose romances, no prose works of any real importance can be quoted before the end of the 15th century, and even then the chief if not the only place of importance must be assigned to the Cent Nouvelles Nouvelles, a work of admirable prose, but necessarily light in character, and not yet demonstrating the efficacy of the French language as a medium of expression for serious and weighty thought. Up to the time of the Renaissance and the consequent reformation, Latin had, as we have already remarked, been considered the sufficient and natural See also:organ for this expression. In France as in other countries the disturbance in religious thought may undoubtedly claim the See also:glory of having repaired this disgrace of the vulgar tongue, and of having fitted and taught it to See also:express whatever thoughts the theologian, the historian, the philosopher, the politician and the savant had occasion to utter. But the use of prose as a vehicle for lighter themes was more continuous with the literature that preceded,and serves as a natural transition from poetry and the drama to history and science. Among the prose writers, therefore, of the 16th century we shall give the first place to the novelists and romantic writers. Among these there can be no doubt of the See also:precedence, in every sense of the word, of Francois Rabelais (c. 1490-1553), the one French writer (or with Moliere one of the two) Rabelais. whom critics the least inclined to appreciate the characteristics of French literature have agreed to place among the few greatest of the world. With an immense erudition representing almost the whole of the knowledge of his time, with an untiring faculty of invention, with the judgment of a philosopher, and the common sense of a man of the world, with an observation that let no characteristic of the time pass unobserved, and with a tenfold portion of the special Gallic See also:gift of good-humoured satire, Rabelais united a height of speculation and depth of insight and a vein of poetical imagination rarely found in any writer, but altogether portentous when taken in See also:conjunction with his other characteristics. His great work has been taken for an exercise of transcendental See also:philosophy, for a concealed theological polemic, for an allegorical history of this and that personage of his time, for a merely literary utterance, for an attempt to tickle the popular ear and taste. It is all of these, and it is none—all of them in parts, none of them in deliberate and exclusive intention. It may perhaps be called the exposition and commentary of all the thoughts, feelings, aspirations and knowledge of a particular time and nation put forth in attractive literary form by a man who for once combined the practical and the literary spirit, the power of knowledge and the power of expression. The work of Rabelais is the mirror of the 16th century in France, reflecting at once its comeliness and its uncomeliness, its high aspirations, its voluptuous tastes, its political and religious dissensions, its keen criticism, its eager appetite and hasty digestion of learning, its gleams of poetry, and its ferocity of manners. In Rabelais we can divine the " Pleiade " and Marot, the Cymbalum mundi and Montaigne, Amyot and the Amadis, even Calvin and See also:Duperron. It was inevitable that such extraordinary works as Gargantua and Pantagruel should attract special imitators in the direction of their outward form. It was also inevitable that this imitation should frequently See also:fix upon these Rabelaisian characteristics which are least deserving of imitation, and most likely to be depraved in the hands of imitators. It See also:fell within the See also:plan of the master to indulge in what has been called f atrasie, the huddling together, that is to say, of a medley of language and images which is best known to English readers in the not always successful following of See also:Sterne. It pleased him also to disguise his naturally terse, strong and nervous style in a See also:burlesque envelope of redundant language, partly ironical, partly the result of superfluous erudition, and partly that of a certain childish wantonness and exuberance, which is one of his raciest and pleasantest characteristics. In both these points he was some-what corruptly followed. But fortunately the romancical writers of the 16th century had not Rabelais for their sole model, but were also influenced by the simple and straightforward style of the Cent Nouvelles Nouvelles. The joint influence gives us some admirable work. Nicholas of Troyes, a saddler of Champagne, came too early (his Grand Parangon des nouvelles nouvelles appeared in 1536) to copy Rabelais. But See also:Noel du Fail (d. c. 1585?), a See also:judge at See also:Rennes, shows the double influence in his See also:Pro Qs rustiques and Contes d'Eutrapel, both of which, especially the former, are lively and well-written pictures of contemporary life and thought, as the country See also:magistrate actually saw and dealt with them. In 1558, however, appeared two works of far higher literary and social interest. These are the Heptameron of the queen of Navarre, and the Conies et joyeux devis of Bonaventure des Periers (c. 1500-1544). Des Periers, who was a courtier of Marguerite's, has peelers, sometimes been thought to have had a good deal to do with the first-named work as well as with the second, and was also the author of a curious Lucianic satire, strongly sceptical in cast, the Cymbalum mundi. Indeed, not merely the queen's prose works, but also the poems gracefully entitled Les Marguerites de la Marguerite, are often attributed to the literary men whom the sister of Francis I. gathered round her. However this may be, some single influence of power enough to give unity and distinctness of savour evidently presided over the composition of the Heptameron. The See also:Nap- tamlron. Composed as it is on the model of Boccaccio, its See also:tone and character are entirely different, and few works have a more individual charm. The Tales of des Periers are shorter, simpler and more homely; there is more wit in them and less refinement. But both works breathe, more powerfully perhaps than any others, the peculiar mixture of cultivated and poetical voluptuousness with a certain religiosity and a vigorous spirit of action which characterizes the French Renaissance. Later in time, but too closely connected with Rabelais in form and spirit to be here omitted, came the See also:Mayen de parvenir of Beroalde de Verville (1558?-1612?), a singular fatrasie, uniting wit, wisdom, learning and indecency, and crammed with anecdotes which are always amusing though rarely decorous. At the same time a fresh vogue was given to the chivalric romance by Herberay's translation of A madis de Gaula. French writers have supposed a French original for the claw. madis of Amadis in some lost roman d'aventures. It is of course impossible to say that this is not the case, but there is not one tittle of evidence to show that it is. At any rate the adventures of Amadis were prolonged in See also:Spanish through generation after generation of his descendants. This vast work Herberay des Essarts in 1540 undertook to translate or re-translate, but it was not without the assistance of several followers that the task was completed. Southey has charged Herberay with corrupting the simplicity of the original, a charge which does not concern us here. It is sufficient to say that the French Amadis is an excellent piece of literary work, and that Herberay deserves no mean place among the fathers of French prose. His book had an immense popularity; it was translated into many foreign See also:languages, and for some time it served as a favourite reading book for foreigners studying French. Nor is it to be doubted that the romancers of the See also:Scudery and Calprenede type in the next century were much more influenced both for good and harm by these Amadis romances than by any of the earlier tales of chivalry. 16th-Century Historians.—As in the case of the tale-tellers, so in that of the historians, the writers of the 16th century had traditions to continue. It is doubtful indeed whether many of them can See also:risk comparison as artists with the great names of Villehardouin and Joinville, Froissart and Comines. The 16th century, however, set the example of dividing the functions of the chronicler, setting those of the historian proper on one side, and of the See also:anecdote-monger and biographer on the other. The efforts at regular history made in this century were not of the highest value. But on the other hand the practice of memoir-writing, in which the French were to excel every nation in the world, and of literary See also:correspondence, in which they were to excel even their memoirs, was solidly founded. One of the earliest historical writers of the century was See also:Claude de Seyssel (1450-1520), whose history of Louis XII. aims not unsuccessfully at style. De See also:Thou (1553-1617) wrote in Latin, but Bernard de See also:Girard, sieur du Haillan (1537-1610), composed a Histoire de France on Thucydidean principles as transmitted through the successive mediums of See also:Polybius, See also:Guicciardini and See also:Paulus See also:Aemilius. The instance invariably quoted, after See also:Thierry, of du Haillan's method is his introduction, with appropriate speeches, of two Merovingian statesmen who argue out the relative merits of See also:monarchy and See also:oligarchy on the occasion of the See also:election of Pharamond. Besides du Haillan, la Popelinicre (c. 1540-1608), who less ambitiously attempted a history of Europe during his own time, and expended immense labour on the collection of See also:information and materials, deserves mention. There is no such poverty of writers of memoirs. Robert de la See also:Mark, du Bellay, Marguerite de See also:Valois (the youngest or third Marguerite, first wife of Henri IV., 1553-1615), See also:Villars, Tavannes, La Tour d'Auvergne, and many others composedcommentaries and autobiographies., The well-known and very agreeable Histoire du gentil seigneur de Bayart (1524) is by an anonymous " Loyal Serviteur." See also:Vincent Carloix (fl. 1550), the secretary of the marshal de Vielleville, composed some memoirs abounding in detail and incident. The Lettres of See also:Cardinal d'Ossat (1536-1604) and the Negotiations of Pierre See also:Jeannin (1540-1622) have always had a high place among documents of their kind. But there are four collections of memoirs concerning this time which far exceed all others in interest and importance. The turbulent dispositions of the time, the loose dependence of the nobles and even the smaller gentry on any single or central authority, the rapid changes of political situations, and the singularly active appetite, both for See also:pleasure and for business, for learning and for war, which distinguished the French gentleman of the 16th century, place the memoirs of Francois de Lanoue (1531-1591), Blaise de Mon[t]luc (1503-1577), Agrippa d'Aubigne and Pierre de Bourdeille[s] Brant6me (1540-1614) almost at the head of the literature of their class. The name of Brant6me is known to all who have the least See also:tincture of French literature, and the works of the others are not inferior in interest, and perhaps superior in spirit and conception, to the Dames Galantes, the Grands Capitaines and the Hommes See also:illustres. The commentaries of See also:Montluc, which Henri Quatre is said to have called the soldier's Bible, are exclusively military and deal with affairs only. Montluc was See also:governor in See also:Guienne, where he repressed the savage Huguenots of the south with a savagery worse than their own. He was, however, a See also:partisan of order, not of Catholicism. He hung and shot both parties with perfect impartiality, and refused to have anything to do with the See also:massacre of St See also:Bartholomew. Though he was a man of no learning, his style is excellent, being vivid, flexible and straightforward. Lanoue, who was a moderate in politics, has left his principles reflected in his memoirs. D'Aubigne, so often to be mentioned, gives the extreme Huguenot side as opposed to the, royalist partisanship of Montluc and the via See also:media of Lanoue. Brant6me, on the other hand, is quite free See also:Brantome. from any political or religious prepossessions, and, indeed, troubles himself very little about any such matters. He is the shrewd and somewhat cynical observer, moving through the See also:crowd and taking note of its ways, its outward appearance, its heroisms and its follies. It is really difficult to say whether the recital of a noble See also:deed of arms or the telling of a scandalous story about a court lady gave him the most pleasure; and impossible to say which he did best. Certainly he had ample material for both exercises in the history of his time. The branches of literature of which we have just given an account may be fairly connected, from the historical point of view, with work of the same kind that went before as well as with work of the same kind that followed them. It was not so with the literature of See also:theology, law, politics and erudition, which the 16th century also produced, and with which it for the first time enlarged the range of composition in the vulgar tongue. Not only had Latin been invariably adopted as the language of composition on such subjects, but the style of the treatises dealing with such matters had been traditional rather than original. In speculative philosophy or See also:metaphysics proper even this century did not See also:witness a great development; perhaps, indeed, such a development was not to be expected until the minds of men had in some degree settled down from their agitation on more practical matters. It is not without significance that Calvin (1509-1564) is the great figure in serious French prose in the first half of the century, Montaigne the corresponding figure in the second half. After Calvin and Montaigne we expect See also:Descartes. 16th-Century Theologians.—In France, as in all other countries, the Reformation was an essentially popular movement, though from special causes, such as the See also:absence of political Calvin. homogeneity, the nobles took a more active part both with pen and See also:sword in it than was the case in England. But the great textbook of the French Reformation was not the work of any noble. Jean Calvin's Institution of the Christian Religion is a book equally remarkable in matter and in form, in circum- were characteristic of the time. This doubt assumes the form stances and in result. It is the first really great composition in argumentative French prose. Its severe See also:logic and careful arrangement had as much influence on the manner of future thought, both in France and the other regions whither its wide-spread popularity carried it, as its style had on the expression of such thought. It was the work of a man of only seven-andtwenty, and it is impossible to exaggerate the originality of its manner when we remember that hardly any models of French prose then existed except tales and chronicles, which required and exhibited totally different qualities of style. It is indeed probable that had not the Institution been first written by its author in Latin, and afterwards translated by him, it might have had less dignity and vigour; but it must at the same time be remembered that this process of composition was at least equally likely, in the hands of any but a great genius, to produce a heavy and pedantic style neither French nor Latin in character. Some-thing like this result was actually produced in some of Calvin's minor works, and still more in the works of many of his followers, whose lumbering language gained for itself, in allusion to their See also:exile from France, the title of " style refugie." Nevertheless, the use of the vulgar tongue on the See also:Protestant side, and the See also:possession of a work of such importance written therein, gave the Reformers an immense advantage which their adversaries were some time in neutralizing. Even before the Institution, Lefevre d'Etaples (x455-1537) and Guillaume See also:Farel (1489-1565) saw and utilized the importance of the vernacular. Calvin (1509-1564) was much helped by Pierre Viret (1511-1571), who wrote a large number of small theological and moral dialogues, and of satirical See also:pamphlets, destined to captivate as well as to instruct the lower See also:people. The more famous See also:Beza (Theodore de Beze) (1519-1605) wrote chiefly in Latin, but he composed in French an ecclesiastical history of the Reformed churches and some translations of the See also:Psalms. Marnix de Sainte Aldegonde (1530-1593), a gentleman of Brabant, followed Viret as a satirical pamphleteer on the Protestant side. On the other hand, the See also:Catholic champions at first affected to disdain the use of the vulgar tongue, and their pamphleteers, when they did attempt it, were unequal to the task. Towards the end of the century a more decent war was waged with Philippe du Plessis See also:Mornay (1549-1623) on the Protestant side, whose work is at least as much directed against freethinkers and enemies of See also:Christianity in general as against the dogmas and discipline of Rome. His adversary, the redoubtable Cardinal du See also:Perron (1556-1618), who, originally a Calvinist, went over to the other side, employed French most vigorously in controversial works, chiefly with reference to the See also:eucharist. Du Perron was celebrated as the first controversialist of the time, and obtained dialectical victories over all corners. At the same time the bishop of See also:Geneva, St Francis of Sales (1567-1622), supported the Catholic side, partly by controversial works, but still more by his devotional writings. The Introduction to a Devout Life, which, though actually published early in the next century, had been written some time previously, shares with Calvin's Institution the position of the most important theological work of the period, and is in remark- able contrast with it in style and sentiment as well as in principles and plan. It has indeed been accused of a certain effeminacy, the appearance of which is in all probability mainly due to this very contrast. The 16th century does not, like the 17th, dis- tinguish itself by literary exercises in the pulpit. The furious preachers of the See also:League, and their equally violent opponents, have no literary value. 16th-Century Moralists and Political Writers.—The religious dissensions and political disturbances of the time could not fail to exert an influence on ethical and philosophical ttaigne. thought. Yet, as we have said, the century was not prolific of pure philosophical speculation. The scholastic tradition, though long sterile, still survived, and with it the habit of composing in Latin all works in any way connected with philosophy. The Logic of See also:Ramus in 1555 is cited as the first departure from this See also:rule. Other philosophical works are few, and chiefly express the doubt and the freethinking which of See also:positive religious See also:scepticism only in the Cymbalum mundi of Bonaventure des Periers, a remarkable series of dialogues which excited a great See also:storm, and ultimately drove the author to commit See also:suicide. The Cymbalum mundi is a curious anticipation of the 18th century. The literature of doubt, however, was to receive its principal accession in the famous essays of Michel Eyguem, seigneur de Montaigne (1533-1592). It would be a See also:mistake to imagine the existence of any sceptical propaganda in this charming and popular book. Its principle is not scepticism but egotism; and as the author was profoundly sceptical, this quality necessarily rather than intentionally appears. We have here to deal only very superficially with this as with other famous books, but it cannot be doubted that it expresses the mental attitude of the latter part of the century as completely as Rabelais expresses the mental attitude of the early part. There is considerably less vigour and life in this attitude. Inquiry and protest have given way to a placid conviction that there is not much to be found out, and that it does not much matter; the erudition though abundant is less indiscriminate, and is taken in and given out with less gusto; exuberant drollery has given way to quiet See also:irony; and though neither business nor pleasure is decried, both are regarded rather as useful pastimes incident to the life of man than with the eager appetite of the Renaissance. From the purely literary point of view, the style is remarkable from its absence of pedantry in construction, and yet for its See also:rich vocabulary and picturesque brilliancy. The follower and imitator of Montaigne, Pierre See also:Charron (1541-1603), carried his master's scepticism to a some-what more positive degree. His principal book, De la sagesse, scarcely deserves the comparative praise which Pope has given it. On the other hand Guillaume du Vair (1556.1621), a lawyer and orator, takes the positive rather than the negative side in morality, and regards the vicissitudes in human affairs from the religious and theological point of view in a series of works characterized by the special merit of the style of great orators. The revolutionary and innovating instinct which showed itself in the 16th century with reference to church See also:government and See also:doctrine spread naturally enough to political matters. The intolerable disorder of the religious wars naturally set the thinkers of the age speculating on the doctrines of government in general. The favourite and general study of antiquity helped this tendency, and the great accession of royal power in all the monarchies of Europe invited a speculative if not a practical re-action. The persecutions of the Protestants naturally provoked a republican spirit among them, and the violent antipathy of the League to the houses of Valois and See also:Bourbon made its partisans adopt almost openly the principles of See also:democracy and tyrannicide. The greatest political writer of the age is Jean Bodin (1530-1596), whose Republique is founded partly on speculative considerations like the political theories of the ancients, Eoa1n. and partly on an extended historical inquiry. Bodin, like most lawyers who have taken the royalist side, is for unlimited monarchy, but notwithstanding this, he condemns religious persecution and discourages See also:slavery. In his speculations on the connexion between forms of government and natural causes, he serves as a See also:link between See also:Aristotle and See also:Montesquieu. On the other hand, the causes which we have mentioned made a large number of writers adopt opposite conclusions. Etienne de la Boetie (1530-1563), the friend of Montaigne's youth, composed the Contre un or Discours de la See also:servitude volontaire, a protest against the monarchical theory. The boldness of the protest and the affectionate admiration of Montaigne have given la Boetie a much higher reputation than any extant work of his actually deserves. The Contre un is a kind of See also:prize See also:essay, full of empty declamation borrowed from the ancients, and showing no grasp of the practical conditions of politics. Not much more historically based, but far more vigorous and original, is the Franco-Gallia of Francois Hotmann (1524-1590), a work which appeared both in Latin and French, which extols the authority of the states-general, represents them as direct successors of the political institutions of Gauls and Franks, and maintains the right of insurrection. In the last quarter of the century political animosity knew no See also:bounds. The Protestants beheld a divine instrument in See also:Poltrot de mere, the Catholics in Jacques Clement. The Latin treatises of See also:Hubert See also:Languet (1518—1581) and See also:Buchanan formally vindicated—the first, like Hotmann, the right of See also:rebellion based on an original See also:contract between prince and people, the second the right of tyrannicide. Indeed, as Montaigne confesses, divine authorization for political violence was claimed and denied by both parties according as the possession or the expectancy of power belonged to each, and the excesses of the preachers and pamphleteers knew no bounds. Every one, however, was not carried away. The literary merits of the chancellor Michel de 1'H6pital (1507-1573) are not very great, but his efforts to promote See also:peace and moderation were unceasing. On the other side Lanoue, with far greater literary gifts, pursued the same ends, and pointed out the ruinous consequences of continued dissension. Du Plessis Mornay took a part in political discussion even more important than that which he bore in religious polemics, and was of the utmost service to Henri Quatre in defending his cause against the League, as was also Hurault, another author of state papers. Du Vair, already mentioned, powerfully assisted the same cause by his successful See also:defence of the Salic law, the disregard of which by the Leaguer states-general was intended to lead to the See also:admission of the Spanish claim to the crown. But the foremost work against satire the League was the famous Satire Menippee (1594), See also:minim& in a literary point of view one of the most remarkable of political books. The Menippee was the work of no single author, but was due, it is said, to the collaboration of five, Pierre Leroi, who has the credit of the idea, Jacques See also:Gillot, Florent Chretien, Nicolas Rapin (1541-1596) and Pierre See also:Pithou (1530-1596), with some assistance in verse from Passerat and Gilles See also:Durand. The book is a kind of burlesque See also:report of the meeting of the states-general, called for the purpose of supporting the views of the League in 1593. It gives an account of the procession of opening, and then we have the supposed speeches of the principal characters—the duc de See also:Mayenne, the papal See also:legate, the See also:rector of the university (a ferocious Leaguer) and others. But by far the most remarkable is that attributed to Claude d'Aubray, the See also:leader of the Tiers Eta', and said to be written by Pithou, in which all the evils of the time and the malpractices of the leaders of the League are exposed and branded. The satire is extraordinarily See also:bitter and yet perfectly good-humoured. It resembles in character rather that of Butler, who unquestionably imitated it, than any other. The style is perfectly suited to the purpose, having got rid of almost all vestiges of the cumbrousness of the older tongue without losing its picturesque quaintness. It is no wonder that, as we are told by contemporaries, it did more for Henri Quatre than all other writings in his cause. In connexion with politics some mention of legal orators and writers may be necessary. In 1539 the ordinance of Villers-Cotterets enjoined the exclusive use of the French language in legal See also:procedure. The bar and See also:bench of France during the century produced, however, besides those names already mentioned in other connexions, only one deserving of special notice, that of Etienne Pasquier (1529-1615), author of a celebrated speech against the right of the See also:Jesuits to take part in public teaching. This he inserted in his great work, Recherches de la France, a work dealing with almost every aspect of French history whether political, antiquarian or literary. 16th-Century Savants.—One more See also:division, and only one, that of scientific and learned writers pure and simple, remains. Much of the work of this kind during the period was naturally done in Latin, the vulgar tongue of the learned. But in France, as in other countries, the study of the classics led to a vast number of translations, and it so happened that one of the translators deserves as a prose writer a rank among the highest. Many of the authors already mentioned contributed to the literature of translation. Des Periers translated the Platonic dialogue Lysis, la Boetie some works of See also:Xenophon and See also:Plutarch, du Vair the De See also:corona, the In Ctesiphontem and the Pro Milone. Salel attempted the Iliad, Belleau the false See also:Anacreon, Baif some plays of See also:Plautus and See also:Terence. Besides these Lefevre d'Etaples gave a version of the Bible, Saliat one of See also:Herodotus, and Louis Leroi (1510-1577), not to be confounded with the part author of the Menippee, many works of See also:Plato, Aristotle and other Greek writers. But while most if not all of these translators owed the merits of their work to their originals, and deserved, much more deserve, to be read only by those to whom those originals are sealed, Jacques Amyot (1513-1593), bishop of See also:Auxerre, Amyot. takes rank as a French classic by his translations of Plutarch, See also:Longus and See also:Heliodorus. The admiration which Amyot excited in his own time was immense. Montaigne declares that it was thanks to him that his contemporaries knew how to speak and to write, and the See also:Academy in the next age, though not too much inclined to honour its predecessors, ranked him as a model. His Plutarch, which had an enormous influence at the time, and coloured perhaps more than any classic the thoughts and writings of the 16th century, both in French and English, was then considered his masterpiece. Nowadays perhaps, and from the purely literary standpoint, that position would be assigned to his exquisite version of the exquisite story of See also:Daphnis and Chloe. It is needless to say that See also:absolute fidelity and exact scholarship are not the pre-eminent merits of these versions. They are not philological exercises, but works of art. On the other hand, Claude See also:Fauchet (153o-16o1) in two antiquarian works, Antiquites gauloises et francoises and L'Origine de la langue et de la poesie francaise, displays a remarkable critical faculty in sweeping away the fables which had encumbered history. Fauchet had the (for his time) wonderful habit of consulting manuscripts, and we owe to him literary notices of many of the trouveres. At the same time Francois Grude, sieur de la Croix du See also:Maine (1552-1592), and Antoine Duverdier (1544-1600) founded the study of bibliography in France. Pasquier's Recherches, already alluded to, carries out the principles of Fauchet independently, and besides treating the history of the past in a true critical spirit, supplies us with voluminous and invaluable information on contemporary politics and literature. He has, moreover, the merit which Fauchet had not, of being an excellent writer. Henri See also:Estienne [Stephanus] (1528-1598) also deserves notice in this place, both for certain treatises on the French language, full of critical crotchets, and also for his curious Apologie pour Herodote, a remarkable book not particularly easy to class. It consists partly of a defence of its nominal subject, partly of satirical polemics on the Protestant side, and is filled almost equally with erudition and with the buffoonery and fatrasie of the time. The book, indeed, was much too Rabelaisian to suit the tastes of those in whose defence it was composed. The 16th century is somewhat too early for us to speak of science, and such science as was then composed falls for the most part outside French literature. The famous See also:potter, Bernard See also:Palissy (1510-1590), however, was not much less skilful as a fashioner of words than as a fashioner of pots, and his description of the difficulties of his experiments in enamelling, which lasted sixteen years, is well known. The great surgeon See also:Ambrose See also:Pare (c. 1510-Ingo) was also a writer, and his descriptions of his military experiences at See also:Turin, Metz and elsewhere have all the charm of the 16th-century memoir. The only other writers who require special mention are Olivier de See also:Serres (1539-1619), who composed, under the title of Theatre d'See also:agriculture, a complete See also:treatise on the various operations of rural See also:economy, and Jacques du Fouilloux (1521-1580), who wrote on See also:hunting (La Venerie). Both became extremely popular and were frequently reprinted. 17th-Century Poetry.—It is not always easy or possible to make the end or the beginning of a literary epoch synchronize exactly with historical dates. It happens, however, that for Malherbe. once the beginning of the 17th century coincides almost exactly with an entire revolution in French literature. The change of direction and of critical See also:standard given by Francois de Malherbe (1556-1628) to poetry was to last for two whole centuries, and to determine, not merely the language and complexion, but also the form of French verse during the whole of that time. Accidentally, or as a matter of logical consequence (it would not be proper here to attempt to decide the question), poetry became almost synonymous with drama. It is true, as we shall have to point out, that there were, in the early part of the 17th century at least, poets, properly so called, of no contemptible merit. But their merit, in itself respectable, sank in comparison with the far greater merit of their dramatic rivals. Theophile de Viau and See also:Racan, Voiture and Saint-Amant cannot for a moment be mentioned in the same rank with Corneille. It is certainly curious, if it is not something more than curious, that this decline in poetry proper should have coincided with the so-called reforms of Malherbe. The tradition of respect for this elder and more gifted Boileau was at one time all-powerful in France, and, notwithstanding the Romantic movement, is still strong. In rejecting a large number of the importations of the Ronsardists, he certainly did good service. But it is difficult to avoid ascribing in great measure to his influence the origin of the chief faults of modern French poetry, and modern French in general, as compared with the older language. He pronounced against " poetic diction " as such, forbade the overlapping (enjambement) of verse, insisted that the middle pause should be of sense as well as sound, and that rhyme must satisfy See also:eye as well as ear. Like Pope, he sacrificed everything to "correctness," and, unluckily for French, the See also:sacrifice was made at a time when no writer of an absolutely supreme order had yet appeared in the language. With Shakespeare and Milton, not to mention scores of writers only inferior to them, safely garnered, Pope and his followers could do us little harm. Corneille and Moliere unfortunately came after Malherbe. Yet it would be unfair to this writer, however badly we may think of his influence, to deny him talent, and even a certain amount of poetical See also:inspiration. He had not felt his own influence, and the very influences which he despised and proscribed produced in him much tolerable and some admirable verse, though he is not to be named as a poet with Regnier, who had the courage, the sense and the good taste to oppose and ridicule his innovations. Of Malherbe's school, Honorat de Bueil, See also:marquis de Racan (1589-1670), and Francois de. See also:Maynard (1582-1646) were the most remarkable. The former was a true poet, though not a very strong one. Like his master, he is best when he follows the models whom that master contemned. Perhaps more than any other poet, he set the example of the classical alexandrine, the smooth and melodious but monotonous and rather effeminate measure which Racine was to bring to the highest perfection, and which his successors, while they could not improve its smoothness, were to make more and more monotonous until the genius of Victor Hugo once more See also:broke up its facile See also:polish, supplied its stiff uniformity, and introduced vigour, variety, See also:colour and distinctness in the place of its feeble sameness and its See also:pale indecision. But the vigour, not to say the licence, of the 16th century could not thus See also:die all at once. In Theophile de Viau (1591-1626) the early years of the 17th century had their Villon. The later poet was almost as unfortunate as the earlier, and almost as disreputable, but he had a great share of poetical and not a small one of critical power. The etoile enragee under which he complains that he was born was at least kind to him in this respect; and his readers, after he had been forgotten for two centuries, have once more done him justice. Racan and Theophile were followed in the second quarter of the century by two schools which sufficiently well represented the tendencies of each. The first was that of Vincent Voiture (1598-1648), See also:Isaac de See also:Benserade (1612-1691), and other poets such as Claude de Maleville (1597-1647), author of La Belle Matineuse, who were connected more or less with the famous literary coterie of the Hotel de See also:Rambouillet. Theophile was less worthily succeeded by a class, it can hardly be called a school of poets, some of whom, like Gerard Saint-Amant (1594-1660), wrote drinking songs of merit and other light pieces; others, like See also:Paul See also:Scarron (1610-166o) and Sarrasin (1603? 4? 5?-1654), devoted themselves rather to burlesque of serious verse. Most of the great dramatic authors of the time also wrote miscellaneous poetry, and there was even an epic school of the most singular kind, in ridiculing and discrediting which Boileau for once did undoubtedly good service. The Pucelle of Jean See also:Chapelain (1595-1674), the unfortunate author who was deliberately trained and educated for a poet, who enjoyed for some time a sort of dictatorship in French literature on the strength of his forthcoming work, and at whom from the day of its publication every critic of French literature has agreed to laugh, was the most famous and perhaps the worst of these. But Georges de Scudery (1601-1667) wrote an See also:Alaric, the Pere le Moyne (16oz-1671) a Saint Louis, Jean See also:Desmarets de Saint-Sorlin (1595-1676), a dramatist and critic of some note, a See also:Clovis, and Saint-Amant a Mozse, which were not much better, though Theophile Gautier in his Grotesques has valiantly defended these and other contemporary versifiers. And indeed it cannot be denied that even the epics, especially Saint Louis, contain flashes of finer poetry than France was to produce for more than a century outside of the drama. Some of the lighter poets and classes of poetry just alluded to also produced some remarkable verse. The Precieuses of the Hotel Rambouillet, with all their absurdities, encouraged if they did not produce good literary work. In their society there is no doubt that a great reformation of manners took place, if not of morals, and that the tendency to literature elegant and polished, yet not destitute of vigour, which marks the 17th century, was largely developed side by side with much scandal-mongering and anecdotage. Many of the authors whom these influences inspired, such as Voiture, Saint-Evremond and others, have been or will be noticed. But even such poets and wits as Antoine Baudouin de Senece (1643-1737), Jean de Segrais (1624-1701), Charles Faulure de Ris, sieur de Charleval (1612-1693), Antoine Godeau (1605-1672), Jean Ogier de Gombaud (1590-1666), are not without interest in the history of literature; while if Charles Cotin (1604-1682) sinks below this level and deserves Moliere's See also:caricature of him as Trissotin in Les Femmes savantes, Gilles de See also:Menage (1630-1692) certainly rises above it, notwithstanding the See also:companion satire of Vadius. Menage's name naturally suggests the See also:Ana which arose at this time and were long fashionable, stores of endless See also:gossip, some-times providing instruction and often amusement. The Guirlande de Julie, in which most of the poets of the time celebrated Julie d'Angennes, daughter of the marquise de Rambouillet, is perhaps the best of all such albums, and Voiture, the typical poet of the coterie, was certainly the best writer of vers de societg who is known to us. The poetical war which arose between the Uranistes, the followers of Voiture, and the Jobistes, those of Benserade, produced reams of sonnets, epigrams and similar verses. This habit of occasional versification continued long. It led as a less important consequence to the rhymed Gazettes of Jean Loret (d. 1665), which recount in octosyllabic verse of a light and lively kind the festivals and court events of the early years of Louis XIV. It led also to perhaps the most remarkable non-dramatic poetry of the century, the Contes and Fables of Jean de la Fontaine (1621-1695). No French writer is better known than la Fontaine, and there is no need to dilate on his merits. It has been Well said that he completes Moliere, and that the two together give something to French literature which no other literature possesses. Yet la Fontaine is after all only a writer of fabliaux, in the language and with the manners of his own century. All the writers we have mentioned belong more or less to the first half of the century, and so do Valentin See also:Conrart (1603-1675), Antoine Furetiere (1626-1688), Chapelle (Claude See also:Emmanuel) 1'Huillier (1626-1686), and others not worth special mention. The latter half of the century is far less productive, and the poetical quality of its production is even lower than the quantity. In it Boileau (1636-1711) is the chief poetical figure. Next to him can only be mentioned Madame See also:Deshoulieres (1638-1694), Guillaume de Brebeuf (1618-1661), the translator of See also:Lucan, Philippe See also:Quinault (1635-1688), the composer of opera libretti. Boileau's satire, where it has much merit, is usually borrowed direct from See also:Horace. He had a certain faculty as a critic of the slashing order, and might have profitably used it if he had written in prose. But of his poetry it must be said, not so much that it is bad, as that it is not, in strictness, poetry at all, and the same is generally true of all those who followed him. 17th-Century Drama.—We have already seen how the medieval theatre was formed, and how in the second half of the 16th century it met with a formidable rival in the classical drama of Jodelle and Garnier. In 1588 mysteries had been prohibited, and with the See also:prohibition of the mysteries the Confraternity of the Passion lost the principal part of its reason for existence. The other bodies and societies of amateur actors had already perished, and at length the Hotel de Bourgogne itself, the home of the con-fraternity, had been handed over to a regular See also:troop of actors, while companies of strollers, whose life has been vividly depicted in the Roman comique of Scarron and the Capitaine Fracasse of Theophile Gautier, wandered all about the provinces. The old farce was for a time maintained or revived by See also:Tabarin, a remark-able figure in dramatic history, of whom but little is known. The great dramatic author of the first quarter of the 17th century was See also:Alexandre See also:Hardy (1569-1631), who surpassed even See also:Heywood Hardy. in fecundity, and very nearly approached the por- tentous productiveness of Lope de See also:Vega. Seven hundred is put down as the modest total of Hardy's pieces, but not much more than a twentieth of these exist in See also:print. From these latter we can judge Hardy. They are hardly up to the level of the worst specimens of the contemporary Elizabethan theatre, to which, however, they bear a certain resemblance. See also:Marston's Insatiate Countess and the worst parts of See also:Chapman's See also:Bussy d'Ambois may give English readers some notion of them. Yet Hardy was not totally devoid of merit. He imitated and adapted Spanish literature, which was at this time to France what Italian was in the century before and English in the century after, in the most indiscriminate manner. But he had a consider-able command of grandiloquent and melodramatic expression, a sound theory if not a sound practice of tragic writing, and that peculiar knowledge of theatrical art and of the taste of the theatrical public which since his time has been the special possession of the French playwright. It is instructive to compare the influence of his irregular and faulty genius with that of the regular and precise Malherbe. From Hardy to Rotrou is, in point of literary interest, a great step, and from Rotrou to Corneille a greater. Yet the theory of Hardy only wanted the genius of Rotrou and Corneille to produce the latter. Jean de Rotrou (1610-165o) has been called the French See also:Marlowe, and there is a curious likeness and yet a curious contrast between Rotrou. the two poets. The best parts of Rotrou's two best plays, Venceslas and St Genest, are quite beyond comparison in respect of anything that preceded them, and the central speech of the last-named play will rank with anything in French dramatic poetry. Contemporary with Rotrou were other dramatic writers of considerable dramatic importance, most of them distinguished by the faults of the Spanish school, its declamatory See also:rodomontade, its conceits, and its occasionally preposterous action. Jean de See also:Schelandre (d. 1635) has left us a remarkable work in See also:Tyr et See also:Sidon, which exemplifies in practice, as its almost more remarkable See also:preface by Francois Ogier defends in principle, the English-Spanish model. Theophile de Viau in Pyrame et Thisbe and in Pasiphae produced a singular mixture of the classicism of Garnier and the extravagancies of Hardy. Scudery in L'Amour tyrannique and other plays achieved a considerable success. The Marianne of Tristan (1601-1655) and the Sophonisbe of Jean de See also:Mairet (1604-1686) are the chief pieces of their authors. Mairet resembles Marston in something more than his choice of subject. Another dramatic writer of some See also:eminence is Pierre du Ryer (1606-1648). But the fertility of France at this moment in dramatic authors was immense; nearly too are enumerated in the first quarter Corneille. of the century. The early plays of Pierre Corneille (1606-1684) showed all the faults of his contemporaries combined with merits to which none of them except Rotrou, and Rotrou himself only in part, could lay claim. His first play was Melite, a comedy, and in Clitandre, a tragedy, he soon pro- duced what may perhaps be not inconveniently taken as the typical piece of the school of Hardy. A full account of Corneille xi. 5may be found elsewhere. It is sufficient to say here that his importance in French literature is quite as great in the way of influence and example as in the way of intellectual excellence. The See also:Cid and the Menteur are respectively the first examples of French tragedy and comedy which can be called modern. But this influence and example did not at first find many imitators. Corneille was a member of Richelieu's band of five poets. Of the other four Rotrou alone deserves the title; the remaining three, the prolific See also:abbe de See also:Boisrobert, Guillaume Colletet (whose most valuable work, a MS. Lives of Poets, was never printed, and burnt by the Communards in 1871), and Claude de Lestoile (1597-1651), are as dramatists worthy of no notice, nor were they soon followed by others more worthy. Yet before many years had passed the examples which Corneille had set in tragedy and in comedy were followed up by unquestionably the greatest comic writer, and by one who long held the position of the greatest tragic writer of France. Beginning with mere farces of the Italian type, and passing from these to comedies still of an Italian character, it was in Les Precieuses ridicules, acted in 1659, that Moliere (1622-1673), in the words of a spectator, hit at last on " la bonne comedie." The next fifteen years ~Eo. era. comprise the whole of his best known work, the finest expression beyond doubt of a certain class of comedy that any literature has produced. The tragic masterpieces of Racine (1639-1699) were not far from coinciding with the Racine. comic masterpieces of Moliere, for, with the exception of the remarkable aftergrowth of See also:Esther and Athalie, they were produced chiefly between 1667 and 1677. Both Racine and Moliere fall into the class of writers who require separate mention. Here we can only remark that both to a certain extent committed and encouraged a fault which distinguished much subsequent French dramatic literature. This was the too great individualizing of one point in a character, and the making the man or woman nothing but a blunderer, a lover, a coxcomb, a See also:tyrant and the like. The very titles of French plays show this influence—they are Le Grondeur, Le Joueur, &c. The complexity of human character is ignored. This fault distinguishes both Moliere and Racine from writers of the very highest order; and in especial it distinguishes the comedy of Moliere and the tragedy of Racine from the comedy and tragedy of Shakespeare. In all probability this and other defects of the French drama (which are not wholly apparent in the work of Moliere and Corneille, are shown in their most favourable light in those of Racine, and appear in all their deformity in the successors of the latter) arise from the rigid See also:adoption of the Aristotelian theory of the drama with its unities and other restrictions, especially as transmitted by Horace through Boileau. This adoption was very much due to the influence of the French Academy, which was founded unofficially by Conrart in 1629, which received See also:official standing six years later, and which continued the tradition of Malherbe in attempting constantly to school and correct, as the The Academy. phrase went, the somewhat disorderly instincts of the early French stage. Even the Cid was formally censured for irregularity by it. But it is fair to say that Francois Hedelin, abbe d'See also:Aubignac (1604-1676), whose Pratique du theatre is the most wooden of the critical treatises of the time, was not an academician. It is difficult to say whether the subordination of all other classes of composition to the drama, which has ever since been characteristic of French literature, was or was not due to the predilection of Richelieu, the main See also:protector if not exactly the founder of the Academy, for the theatre. Among the immediate successors and later contemporaries of the three great dramatists we do not find any who deserve high rank as tragedians, though there are some whose comedies are more than respectable. It is at least significant that the restrictions imposed by the See also:academic theory on the comic drama were far less severe than those which tragedy had to undergo. The latter was practically confined, in respect of sources of attraction, to the dexterous manipulation of the unities; the interest of a See also:plot attenuated as much as possible, and intended to produce, instead of pity a mild sympathy, and instead of terror a mild alarm (for the purists decided against Corneille that "admiration was not
II
a tragic passion ") ; and lastly the composition of long tirades to moralizings and theological discussions on Jansenist principles, while Pierre See also:Camus, bishop of See also:Belley (1582–1652), in Palombe and others, approached still nearer to the strictly religious story. In the latter part of the century, the example of La Fontaine, though he himself wrote in poetry, helped to recall the tale-tellers of France to an occupation more worthy of them, more suitable to the genius of the literature, and more likely to last. The reaction against the Clelie school produced first Madame de Villedieu (See also:Catherine Desjardins) (1632–1692), a fluent and facile novelist, who enjoyed great but not enduring popularity. The form which the prose tale took at this period was that of the See also:fairy story. See also:Perrault (1628–1703) and Madame d'See also:Aulnoy (d. 1705) composed specimens of this kind which have never ceased to be popular since. See also: There is yet a third class of prose writing which deserves to be mentioned. It also may probably be traced to Spanish influence, that is to say, to the See also:picaresque romances which the 16th and 17th centuries produced in Spain in large numbers. The most remarkable example of this is the Roman comique of the burlesque writer Scarron. The Roman bourgeois of Antoine Furetiere (1619–1688) also deserves mention as a collection of pictures of the life of the time, arranged in the most desultory manner, but drawn with great vividness, observation and skill. A remarkable writer who had great influence on Moliere has also to be mentioned in this connexion rafher than in any other. This is Cyrano de See also:Bergerac (1619–1655), who, besides composing doubtful comedies and tragedies, writing political pamphlets, and exercising the task of literary criticism in objecting to Scarron's burlesques, produced in his Histoires comiques des etats et empires de la lune et du soleil, half romantic and half satirical compositions, in which some have seen the original of Gulliver's Travels, in which others have discovered only a not very successful imitation of Rabelais, and which, without attempting to decide these questions, may fairly be ranked in the same class of fiction with the masterpieces of See also:Swift and Rabelais, though of course at an immense distance below them. One other work, and in literary influence perhaps the most remarkable of its kind in the century, remains. Madame de See also:Lafayette, Marie de la Vergne (1634–1692), the friend of La Rochefoucauld and of Madame de See also:Sevigne, though she did not exactly anticipate the modern novel, showed the way to it in her stories, the principal of which are Zaide and still more La Princesse de See also:Cleves. The latter, though a long way from Manon Lescaut, Clarissa, or Tom See also: 17th-Century Prose.—If, however, this was the case, it cannot be said that French prose as a whole was unproductive at this time. On the contrary, it was now, and only now, y t} de that it attained the strength and perfection for which See also:Balzac and it has been so long renowned, and which has perhaps, modern by a curious process of See also:compensation, somewhat Preach deteriorated since the restoration of poetry proper prose in France. The prose Malherbe of French literature was Jean Guez de Balzac (1594-1654). The writers of the 17th century $ad practically created the literary language of prose, but they had not created a prose style. The charm of Rabelais, of Amyot, of Montaigne, and of the numerous writers of tales and memoirs whom we have noticed, was a charm of exuberance, of naivete, of picturesque effect—in short, of a mixture of poetry and prose, rather than of prose proper. Sixteenth-century French prose is a delightful instrument in the hands of men and See also:women of genius, but in the hands of those who have not genius it is full of smooth but monotonous verses, arranged in couplets tipped with delicately careful rhymes. Only Thomas Corneille (1625–1709), the inheritor of an older tradition and of a great name, deserves to be excepted from the condemnation to be passed on the lesser tragedians of this period. He was unfortunate in possessing his brother's name, and in being, like him, too voluminous in his compositions; but Camma, Ariane, Le Comte d'See also:Essex, are not tragedies to be despised. On the other hand, the names of Jean de See also:Campistron (1656–1723) and Nicolas Pradon (1632–1698) mainly serve to point injurious comparisons; Joseph Francois lluche (1668–1704) and Antoine La See also:Fosse (1653–1708) are of still less importance, and Quinault's tragedies are chiefly remarkable because he had the good sense to give up writing them and to take to opera. The general excellence of French comedy, on the other hand, was sufficiently vindicated. Besides the splendid sum of Moliere's work, the two great tragedians had each, in Le Menteur and Les Plaideurs, set a capital example to their successors, which was fairly followed. See also:David Augustin de Brueys (1640–1723) and Jean Palaprat (1650–1721) brought out once more the ever new Advocat Patelin besides the capital Grandeur already referred to. Quinault and Campistron wrote fair comedies. Florent Carton See also:Dancourt (1661–1726), Charles See also:Riviere See also:Dufresny (c. 1654–1724), Edmond See also:Boursault (1638–1701), were all comic writers of considerable merit. But the chief comic dramatist of the latter period of the 17th century was Jean Francois See also:Regnard (1655–1709), whose Joueur and Legataire are comedies almost of the first rank. 17th-Century Fiction.—In the See also:department of literature which comes between poetry and prose, that of romance-writing, Heroic the 17th century, excepting one remarkable develop-Romance. ment, was not very fertile. It devoted itself to so many new or changed forms of literature that it had no time to anticipate the modern novel. Yet at the beginning of the century one very curious form of romance-writing was diligently cultivated, and its popularity, for the time immense, prevented the introduction of any stronger style. It is remark-able that, as the first quarter of the 17th century was pre-eminently the epoch of Spanish influence in France, the distinctive satire of Cervantes should have been less imitated than the models which Cervantes satirized. However this may be, the romances of 1600 to 165o form a class of literature vast, isolated, and, perhaps, of all such classes of literature most utterly obsolete and See also:extinct. Taste, affectation or antiquarian See also:diligence have, at one time or another, restored to a just, and sometimes a more than just, measure of reputation most of the literary relics of the past. Romances of chivalry, fabliaux, early drama, Provencal poetry, prose chronicles, have all had, and deservedly, their rehabilitators. But Polexandre and Cleopdtre, Clelie and the Grand See also:Cyrus, have been too heavy for all the See also:industry and energy of literary antiquarians. As we have already hinted, the nearest ancestry which can be found for them is the romances of the Amadis type. But the Amadis, and in a less degree its followers, although long, are long in virtue of incident. The romances of the Clelie type are long in virtue of interminable discourse, moralizing and description. Their manner is not unlike that of the Arcadia and the Euphues which preceded them in England; and they express in point of style the tendency which simultaneously manifested itself all over Europe at this period, and whose chief exponents were Gongora in Spain, See also:Marini in Italy, and See also:Lyly in England. Everybody knows the See also:Carte de Tendre which originally appeared in Clelie, while most people have heard of the shepherds and shepherdesses who figure in the Astree of Honor-6 D'See also:Urfe (1568–1625), on the See also:borders of the Lignon; but here general knowledge ends, and there is perhaps no reason why it should go much further. It is sufficient to say that Madeleine de Scudery (1607–1701) principally devotes herself in the books above mentioned to laborious gallantry and heroism, La Calprenede (1610–1663) in Cassandre et Cleopdtre to something which might have been the historical novel if it had been constructed on a less preposterous scale, and Marin le See also:Roy de See also:Gomberville (1600–1647) in Polexandre of defects, and indeed is nearly unreadable. Now, prose Is essentially an instrument of all work. The poet who has not genius had better not write at all; the prose writer often may and sometimes must dispense with this qualification. He has need, therefore, of a suitable See also:machine to help him to perform his task, and this machine it is the glory of Balzac to have done more than any other person to create. He produced himself no great work, his principal writings being letters, a few discourses and See also:dissertations, and a work entitled Le Socrale chretien, a sort of treatise on political theology. But if the matter of his work is not of the first importance, its manner is of a very different value. Instead of the endless diffuseness of the preceding century, its ill-formed or rather unformed sentences, and its haphazard periods, we find clauses, sentences and paragraphs distinctly planned, shaped and balanced, a cadence introduced which is rhythmical but not metrical, and, in short, prose which is written knowingly instead of the prose which is unwittingly talked. It has been well said of him that he " ecrit pour ecrire "; and such a man, it is evident, if he does nothing else, sets a valuable example to those who write because they have something to say. Voiture seconded Balzac without much intending to do so. His prose style, also chiefly contained in letters, is lighter than that of his contemporary, and helped to gain for French prose the tradition of vivacity and sparkle which it has always possessed, as well as that of correctness and grace. zyth-Century History.—In historical composition, especially in the department of memoirs, this period was exceedingly rich. At last there was written, in French, an entire history of France. The author was Francois Eudes de See also:Mezeray (1610-1683), whose work, though not exhibiting the perfection of style at which some of his contemporaries had already arrived, and though still more or less uncritical, yet deserves the title of history. The example was followed by a large number of writers, some of extended works, some of histories in part. Mezeray himself is said to have had a considerable share in the Histoire du roi Henri le grand by the See also:archbishop Perefixe (1605-1670); Louis See also:Maimbourg (1610-1686) wrote histories of the Crusades and of the League; Paul See also:Pellisson (1624-1693) gave a history of Louis XIV. and a more valuable Memoire in defence of the See also:superintendent See also:Fouquet. Still later in the century, or at the beginning of the next, the Pere d'Orleans (1644-r698) wrote a history of the revolutions of England, the Pere Daniel (1649-1728), like d'Orleans a Jesuit, composed a lengthy history of France and a shorter one on the French military forces. Finally, at the end of the period, comes the great ecclesiastical history of Claude See also:Fleury (1640-1723), a work which perhaps belongs more to the section of erudition than to that of history proper. Three small treatises, however, composed by different authors towards the middle part of the century, supply remarkable instances of prose style in its application to history. These are the Conjurations du comte de Fiesque, written by the famous Cardinal de See also:Retz (1613-1679), the Conspiration de Walstein of Sarrasin, and the Conjuration des Espagnols contre Venise, composed in 1672 by the abbe de Saint-Real (1639 -1692), the author of various historical and critical works deserving less notice. These three works, whose similarity of subject and successive composition at short intervals leave little doubt that a certain amount of intentional rivalry animated the two later authors, are among the earliest and best examples of the monographs for which French, in point of grace of style and lucidity of exposition, has long been the most successful vehicle of expression among European languages. Among other writers of history, as distinguished from memoirs, need only be noticed Agrippa d'Aubigne, whose Histoire universelle closed his long and varied See also:list of works, and Varillas (1624-'696), a historian chiefly remarkable for his extreme untrustworthiness. In point of memoirs and correspondence the period is hardly less fruitful than that which preceded it. The Registres-Journaux of Pierre de l'ltoile (1540-1611) consist of a See also:diary something of the See also:Pepys character, kept for nearly forty years by a person in high official employment. The memoirs of Sully (1560-1641), published under a curious title too long to quote, date also from this time. Henri IV. himself has left a .considerable correspondence, which is not destitute of literary merit, though not equal to the memoirs of his wife. What are commonly called Richelieu's Memoirs were probably written to his order; his Testament politique may be his own. Henri de See also:Rohan (1579-1638) has not memoirs of the first value. Both this and earlier times found chronicle in the singular Historiettes of Gedeon See also:Tallemant des Reaux (1619-1690), a collection of anecdotes, frequently scandalous, reaching from the times of Henri IV. to those of Louis XIV., to which may be joined the letters of Guy Patin (1602-1676). The early years of the latter monarch and the period of the See also:Fronde had the cardinal de Retz himself, than whom no one was certainly better qualified for historian, not to mention a crowd of others, of whom we may mention Madame de See also:Motteville (1621-1689), Jean See also:Herault de See also:Gourville (1625-1703), Mademoiselle de See also:Montpensier (" La Grande Mademoiselle ") (1627-1693), Conrart, See also:Turenne and Mathieu See also:Mole (1584-1663), Francois du Val, marquis de Fontenay-Mareuil (1594-1655), See also:Arnauld d'Andilly (1588-1670). From this time memoirs and memoir writers were ever multiplying. The queen of them all is Madame de Sevigne (1626-1696), on whom, as on most of the great and better-known writers whom we have had and shall have to mention, it is impossible here to dwell at length. The last half of the century produced crowds of similar but inferior writers. The memoirs of Roger de Bussy-Rabutin (1618-'693) (author of a kind of scandalous chronicle called Histoire amoureuse des Gaules) and of Madame de See also:Maintenon (1635-1719) perhaps deserve notice above the others. But this was in truth the style of composition in which the age most excelled. Memoir-writing became the occupation not so much of persons who made history, as was the case from Comines to Retz, as of those who, having culture, leisure and opportunity of observation, devoted themselves to the task of recording the deeds of others, and still more of regarding the incidents of the busy, splendid and cultivated if somewhat frivolous world of the court, in which, from the time of Louis XIV.'s majority, the political life of the nation and almost its whole history were centred. Many, if not most, of these writers were women, who thus founded the celebrity of the French lady for managing her mother-tongue, and justified by results the taste and tendencies of the See also:blue-stockings and precieuses of the Hotel Rambouillet and similar coteries. The life which these writers saw before them furnished them with a subject to be handled with the minuteness and care to which they had been accustomed in the ponderous romances of the Clelie type, but also with the wit and terseness hereditary in France, and only temporarily absent in those ponderous compositions. The efforts of Balzac and the Academy supplied a suitable language and style, and the increasing tendency towards epigrammatic moralizing, which reached its See also:acme in La Rochefoucauld (1663-1680) and La Bruyere (1639-1696), added in most cases point and attractiveness to their writings. 17th-Century Philosophers and Theologians.—To these moralists we might, perhaps, not inappropriately pass at once. But it seems better to consider first the philosophical and Descartes. theological developments of the age, which must share with its historical experiences and studies the credit of producing these writers. Philosophy proper, as we have already had occasion to remark, had hitherto made no use of the vulgar tongue. The '6th century had contributed a few vernacular treatises on logic, a considerable body of political and ethical writing, and a good deal of sceptical speculation of a more or less vague character, continued into our present epoch by such writers as Francois de la Mothe le Vayer (1588-1672), the last representative of the orthodox doubt of Montaigne and Charron. But in metaphysics proper it had not dabbled. The '7th century, on the contrary, was to produce in Rene Descartes (1596-1650), at once a master of prose style, the greatest of French philosophers, and one of the greatest metaphysicians, not merely of France and of the 17th century, but of all countries and times. Even before Descartes there had been considerable and important developments of metaphysical speculation in France. The first eminent philosopher of French birth was Pierre Gassendi (1592-
1655). Gassendi devoted himself to the See also:maintenance of a
modernized form of the Epicurean doctrines, but he wrote mainly,
if not entirely, in Latin. Another sceptical philosopher of a less
scientific character was the physicist See also:Gabriel See also:Naude (160o-1653),
who, like many others of the philosophers of the time, was
accused of See also:atheism. But as none of these could approach
Descartes in philosophical power and originality, so also none
has even a fraction of his importance in the history of French
literature. Descartes stands with Plato, and possibly See also:Berkeley
and See also:Malebranche, at the head of all philosophers in respect of
style; and in his case the excellence is far more remarkable
than in others, inasmuch as he had absolutely no models, and
was forced in a great degree to create the language which he
used. The Discours de la methode is not only one of the epoch-
making books of philosophy, it is also one of the epoch-making
books of French style. The tradition of his clear and perfect
expression was taken up, not merely by his philosophical disciples,
but also by Blaise See also:Pascal (1623–1662) and the school of
See also:Port Royal, who will be noticed presently. The very genius
of the Cartesian philosophy was intimately connected with
this clearness, distinctness and severity of style; and there is
something more than a fanciful contrast between these literary
characteristics of Descartes, on the one hand, and the elaborate
splendour of See also:
consecutiveness of thought, is equally admirable for its elegance of style. Malebranche cannot indeed, like his great master, claim absolute originality. But his excellence as a writer is as great as, if not greater than, that of Descartes, and the Recherche remains to this day the one philosophical treatise of great length and abstruseness which, merely as a book, is delightful to read—not like the works of Plato and Berkeley, because of the See also:adventitious See also:graces of dialogue or description, but from the purity and grace of the language, and its admirable adjustment to the purposes of the argument. Yet, for all this, philosophy hardly flourished in France. It was too intimately connected with theological and ecclesiastical questions, and especially with See also:Jansenism, to See also:escape suspicion and persecution. Descartes himself was for much of his life an exile in See also: But his great See also:dictionary, though one of the most heterogeneous and unmethodical of compositions, exercised an enormous influence. It may be called the Bible of the 18th century, and contains in the germ all the desultory philosophy, the ill-ordered scepticism, and the critical but negatively critical acuteness of the Aufklarung. We have said that the philosophical, theological and moral tendencies of the century, which produced, with the exceptionof its dramatic triumphs, all its greatest literary works, are almost inextricably intermingled. Its earliest years, however, bear in theological matters rather the complexion of the previous century. Du Perron and St Francis of Sales sen ~'' n/ats. survived until nearly the end of its first quarter, and the most remarkable works of the latter bear the dates of 16o8 and later. It was not, however, till some years had passed, till the See also:counter-Reformation had reconverted the largest and most powerful portion of the Huguenot party, and till the influence of Jansenius and Descartes had time to work, that the extraordinary outburst of Gallican theology, both in pulpit and in press, took place. The Jansenist controversy may perhaps be awarded the merit of provoking this, as far as writing was concerned. The astonishing eloquence of contemporary pulpit oratory may be set down partly to the zeal for See also:conversion of which du Perron and de Sales had given the example, partly to the same taste of the time which encouraged dramatic performances, for the sermon and the tirade have much in common. Jansenius himself, though a Dutchman by birth, passed much time in France, and it was in France that he found most disciples. These disciples consisted in the first place of the members of the society of Port Royal des Champs, a coterie after the fashion of the time, but one which devoted itself not to sonnets or madrigals but to devotional exercises, study and the teaching of youth. This coterie early adopted the Cartesian philosophy, and the Port Royal Port Logic was the most remarkable popular hand-book Royal. of that school. In theology they adopted Jansenism, and were in consequence soon at daggers drawn with the Jesuits, according to the polemical habits of the time. The most distinguished champions on the Jansenist side were Jean Duvergier de Hauranne, abbe de St Cyran(r 581–1643), and Antoine Arnauld (1560-1619), but by far the most important literary results of the quarrel were the famous Provinciales of Pascal, or, to give them their proper title, Leltres ecrites d un provincial. Their literary importance consists, not merely in their pascal. grace of style, but in the application to serious discussion of the peculiarly polished and quiet irony of which Pascal is the greatest master the world has ever seen. Up to this time controversy had usually been conducted either in the mere bludgeon fashion of the Scaligers and Saumaises—of which in the vernacular the Jesuit Francois Garasse (1585–1631) had already contributed remarkable examples to literary and moral controversy—or else in a dull and legal style, or lastly under an envelope of Rabelaisian buffoonery such as survives to a considerable extent in the Satire Menippee. Pascal set the example of combining the use of the most terribly effective weapons with good See also:humour, good breeding and a polished style. The example was largely followed, and the manner of Voltaire and his followers in the 18th century owes at least as much to Pascal as their method and matter do to Bayle. The Jansenists, attacked and persecuted by the civil power, which the Jesuits had contrived to interest, were finally suppressed. But the Provinciales had given them an unapproachable superiority in matter of argument and literature. Their other literary works were inferior, though still remarkable. Antoine Arnauld (the younger, often called " the great ") (1612–1694) and Pierre See also:Nicole (1625–1695) managed their native language with vigour if not exactly with grace. They maintained their orthodoxy by writings, not merely against the Jesuits, but also against the Protestants such as the Perpetuite de la foi due to both, and the Apologie des Catholiques written by Arnauld alone. The latter, besides being responsible for a good deal of the Logic (L'Art de penser) to which we have alluded, wrote also much of a Grammaire generale composed by the Port Royalists for the use of their pupils; but his principal devotion was to theology and theological polemics. To the latter Nicole also contributed Les Visionnaires, Les Imaginaires and other works. The studious recluses of Port Royal also produced a large quantity of miscellaneous literary work, to which full justice has been done in Sainte-Beuve's well-known volumes.
17th-Century Preachers.—When we think of Gallican theology during the 17th century, it is always with the famous pulpit orators of the period that thought is most busied, Nor is this
unjust, for though the most prominent of them all, Jacques
Benign See also:Bossuet (1627–1704) was remarkable as a writer of
matter intended to be read, not merely as a See also:speaker of matter
intended to be heard, this double character is not possessed
by most of the orthodox theologians of the time; and even
Bossuet, great as is his genius, is more of a rhetorician than of a
philosopher or a theologian. In no quarter was the advance of
culture more remarkable in France than in the pulpit. We have
already had occasion to notice the characteristics of French pulpit
eloquence in the 15th and 16th centuries. Though this was very
far from destitute of vigour and imagination, the political frenzy
of the preachers, and the habit of introducing anecdotic buf-
foonery, spoilt the eloquence of Maillard and of Raulin, of
See also:Boucher and of Rose. The powerful use which the Reformed
ministers made of the pulpit stirred up their rivals; the advance
in science and classical study added See also:weight and dignity to the
matter of their discourses. The improvement of prose style and
language provided them with a suitable instrument, and the
growth of taste and refinement purged their sermons of grossness
and buffoonery, of personal allusions, and even, as the monarchy
became more absolute, of direct political purpose. The earliest
examples of this improved style were given by St Francis de
Sales and by Fenouillet, bishop of See also:Marseilles (d. 1652); but: it
was not till the latter half of the century, when the troubles of
the Fronde had completely subsided, and the church was estab-
lished in the favour of Louis XIV., that the full efflorescence of
theological eloquence took place. There were at the time pulpit
orators of considerable excellence in England, and perhaps
See also:Jeremy See also: Hossuet. The characteristics of all these were different. Bossuet, the earliest and certainly the greatest, was also the most universal. He was not merely a preacher; he was, as we have said, a controversialist, indeed somewhat too much of a con- troversialist, as his battle with Fenelon proved. He was a philosophical or at least a theological historian, and his Discours sur l'histoire universelle is equally remarkable from the point of view of theology, philosophy, history and literature. Turning to theological politics, he wrote his Politique tiree de l'ecriture sainte, to theology proper his Meditations sur les evangiles and his Elevations sur les mysteres. But his principal work, after all, is his Oraisons funebres. The funeral sermon was the special oratorical exercise of the time. Its subject and character in- vited the gorgeous if somewhat theatrical commonplaces, the display of historical knowledge and parallel, and the moralizing analogies, in which the age specially rejoiced. It must also be noticed, to the credit of the preachers, that such occasions gave them an opportunity, rarely neglected, of correcting the adulation which was but too frequently characteristic of the period. The spirit of these compositions is fairly reflected in the most famous and often quoted of their phrases, the opening " See also:Mes freres, Dieu seul est grand " of Massillon's funeral discourse on Louis XIV.; and though See also:panegyric is necessarily by no means absent, it is rarely carried beyond bounds. While Bossuet made himself chiefly remarkable in his sermons and in his writings by an almost Hebraic grandeur and rudeness, the more special character- istics of Christianity, largely alloyed with a Greek and Platonic Feneion. spirit, displayed themselves in Fenelon. In pure literature he is not less remarkable than in theology, politics and morals. His practice in matters of style was admir- able, as the universally known Telemaque sufficiently shows to those who know nothing else of his writing. But his taste, both in its correctness and its audacity, is perhaps more admirable still. Despite of Malherbe, Balzac, Boileau and the traditions of nearly a century, he dared to speak favourably of Ronsard, and plainly expressed his opinion that the practice of his own contemporaries and predecessors had cramped and impoverished the French language quite as much as they had polished or purified it. The other doctors whom we have mentioned were more purely theological than the accomplished archbishop of Cambray. Flechier is somewhat more archaic in style than Bossuet or Fenelon, and he is also more definitely a rhetorician than either. Mascaron has the older fault of prodigal and somewhat indiscriminate erudition. But the two latest of the series, Bourdaloue and Massillon, had far the greatest repute in their own time purely as orators, and perhaps deserved this preference. The difference between the two repeated that between du Perron and de Sales. Bourdaloue's great forte was vigorous argument and unsparing denunciation, but he is said to have been lacking in the power of influencing and affecting his hearers. His attraction was purely intellectual, and it is reflected in his style, which is clear and forcible, but destitute of warmth and colour. Massillon, on the other hand, was remarkable for his pathos, and for his power of enlisting and influencing the sympathies of his hearers. Of minor preachers on the same side, Charles de la See also:Rue, a Jesuit (1643–1725), and the Pere Cheminais (1652–1680), according to a somewhat idle form of nomenclature, "the Racine of the pulpit," may be mentioned. The two Protestant ministers whom we have mentioned, though inferior to their rivals, yet deserve See also:honourable mention among the ecclesiastical writers of the period. Claude engaged in a controversy with Bossuet, in which victory is claimed for the invincible See also:eagle of Meaux. Saurin, by far the greater preacher of the two, long continued to occupy, and indeed still occupies, in the See also:libraries of French Protestants, the position given to Bossuet and Massillon on the other side. 17th-Century Moralists.—It is not surprising that the works of Montaigne and Charron, with the immense popularity of the former, should have inclined the more thoughtful minds in France to moral reflection, especially as many other influences, both direct and indirect, contributed to produce the same result. The constant tendency of the refinements in French prose was towards clearness, succinctness and precision, the qualities most necessary in the moralist. The characteristics of the prevailing philosophy, that of Descartes, pointed in the same direction. It so happened, too, that the times were more favour-able to the thinker and writer on ethical subjects than to the speculator in philosophy proper, in theology or in politics. Both the former subjects exposed their cultivators, as we have seen, to the suspicion of unorthodoxy; and to political speculation of any kind the rule of Richelieu, and still more that of Louis XIV., were in the highest degree unfavourable. No successors to Bodin and du Vair appeared; and even in the domain of legal writings, which comes nearest to that of politics, but few names of eminence are to be found. Only the name of Omer-Talon (1595–1652) really illustrates the legal See also:annals of France at this period on the bench, and that of Olivier Patru (1604–1681) at the bar. Thus it happened that the interests of many different classes Pascatand peas8eof persons were concentrated upon moralizings, which writing took indeed very different forms in the hands of Pascal and other See also:grave and serious thinkers of the Jansenist complexion in theology, and in those of literary courtiers like Saint-Evremond (1613–1703) and La Rochefoucauld, whose chief object was to depict the motives and characters prominent in the brilliant and not altogether frivolous society in which they moved. Both classes, however, were more or less tempted by the cast of their thoughts and the genius of the language to adopt the tersest and most epigrammatic form of expression possible, and thus to originate the " pensee " in which, as its greatest later writer, See also:Joubert, has said, " the ambition of the author is to put a book into a See also:page, a page into a phrase, and a phrase into a word." The great genius and admirable style of Pascal are certainly not less shown in his Pensees than in his Provinciales, though perhaps the literary form of the ,former is less strikingly supreme than that of the latter. The author is more dominated by his subject and dominates it less. Nicole, a far inferior writer as well as thinker, has also left a considerable number of Pensees, which have about them something more of the essay and less of the See also:aphorism. They are, however, though not comparable to Pascal, excellent in matter and style, and go far to justify Bayle in calling their author " Tune des plus belles plumes de 1'Europe." In See also:sharp contrast with these thinkers, who are invariably not merely respecters of religion but ardently and avowedly religious, who treat morality from the point of view of the Bible and the church, there arose side by side with them, or only a little later, a very different group of moralists, whose writings have been as widely read, and who have had as great a practical and literary influence as perhaps any other class of authors. The earliest to be born and the last to die of these was Charles de Saint-Denis, seigneur de saint-fvremond (1613–saint- 1703). Saint-Evremond was long known rather as a Evremond. conversational wit, some of whose good things were handed about in manuscript, or surreptitiously printed in foreign lands, than as a writer, and this is still to a certain extent his reputation. He was at least as cynical as his still better known contemporary La Rochefoucauld, if not more so, and he had less intellectual force and less nobility of character. But his wit was very great, and he set the example of the brilliant societies of the next century. Many of Saint-tvremond's printed works are nominally works of literary criticism, but the moralizing spirit pervades all of them. No writer had a greater influence on Voltaire, and through Voltaire on the whole course of French literature after him. In direct literary value, however, no comparison can be made between Saint-Evremond and the author of the Sentences et maximes morales. Francois, duc de la Rochefoucauld (1613–1680), has other literary claims besides those of this famous book. His Memoires La See also:Roche- foucauld. were very favourably judged by his contemporaries, and they are still held to deserve no little praise even among the numerous and excellent works of the kind which that age of memoir-writers produced. But while the Memoires thus invite comparison, the Maximes et sentences stand alone. Even allowing that the mere publication of detached reflections in terse language was not absolutely new, it had never been carried, perhaps has never since been carried, to such a perfection. Beside La Rochefoucauld all other writers are diffuse, vacillating, unfinished, rough. Not only is there in him never a word too much, but there is never a word too little. The thought is always fully expressed, not compressed. Frequently as the See also:metaphor of minting or stamping See also:coin has been applied to the art of manag- ing words, it has never been applied so appropriately as to the See also:maxims of La Rochefoucauld. The form of them is almost beyond praise, and its excellencies, combined with their immense and enduring popularity, have had a very considerable share in influencing the character of subsequent French literature. Of hardly less importance in this respect, though of considerably less intellectual and literary individuality, was the translator of See also:Theophrastus and the author of the Caracteres, La Bruyere. Jean de la Bruyere (1645-1696), though frequently epigrammatic, did not aim at the same incredible terseness as the author of the Maximes. His plan did not, indeed, render it necessary. Both in England and in France there had been during the whole of the century a mania for character writing, both of the general and Theophrastic kind, and of the historical and personal order. The latter, of which our own See also:Clarendon is perhaps the greatest master, abound in the French memoirs of the period. The former, of which the naive sketches of See also:Earle and See also:Overbury are English examples, culminated in those of La Bruyere, which are not only light and easy in manner and matter, but also in style essentially amusing, though instructive as well. Both he and La Rochefoucauld had an enduring effect on the literature which followed them—an effect perhaps superior to that exercised by any other single work in French, except the Roman de la rose and the Essais of Montaigne. 17th-Century Savants.—Of the literature of the 17th century there only remains to be dealt with the section of those writers who devoted themselves to scientific pursuits or to antiquarian erudition of one form or another. It was in this century that literary criticism of French and in French first began to'be largely composed, and after this time we shall give it a separate heading. It was very far, however, from attaining the excellence or observing the form which it afterwards assumed. The institution of the Academy led to various linguistic works. One of the earliest of these was the Remarques of the Savoyard Claude See also:Favre de See also:Vaugelas (1595–1650), afterwards re-edited by Thomas Corneille. Pellisson wrote a history of the Academy itself when it had as yet but a brief one. The famous Examen du Cid was an instance of the literary criticism of the time which was afterwards represented by Rene Rapin (1621–1687), Dominique See also:Bouhours (1628–1702) and Rene de See also:Bossu (1631–1680), while Adrien See also:Baillet (1649–1706) has collected the largest See also:thesaurus of the subject in his Jugemens des savants. Boileau set the example of treating such subjects in verse, and in the latter part of the century Reflexions, Discourses, Observations, and the like, on particular styles, literary forms and authors, became exceedingly numerous. In earlier years France possessed .a numerous band. of classical scholars of the first rank, such as See also:Scaliger and See also:Casaubon, who did not lack followers. But all or almost all this sort of work was done in Latin, so that it contributed little to French literature properly so-called, though the translations from the classics of Nicolas See also:Perrot d'Ablancourt (1606–1664) have always taken rank among the models of French style. On the other hand, mathematical studies were pursued by persons of far other and far greater genius, and, taking from this time forward a considerable position in See also:education and literature in France, had much influence on both. The mathematical discoveries of Pascal and Descartes are well known. Of science proper, apart from See also:mathematics, France. did not produce many distinguished cultivators in this century. The philosophy of Descartes was not on the whole favourable to such investigations, which were in the next century to be pursued with ardour. Its tendencies found more congenial vent and are more thoroughly exemplified in the famous quarrel between the Ancients contra. and the Moderns. This, of Italian origin, was mainly versy started in France by Charles Perrault (1628–1703), between who thereby rendered much less service to literature Ancients than by his charming fairy tales. The opposite side Moandderns. was taken by Boileau, and the fight was afterwards revived by Antoine Houdar[d, t] de la Motte (1672–1731), a writer of little learning but much talent in various ways, and by the celebrated Madame See also:Dacier, See also:Anne Lefevre (1654–1720). The discussion was conducted, as is well known, without very much knowledge or judgment among the disputants on the one side or on the other. But at this very time there were in France students and scholars of the most profound erudition. We have already mentioned Fleury and his ecclesiastical history. But Fleury is only the last and the most popular of a See also:race of omnivorous and untiring scholars, whose labours have ever since, until the modern fashion of first-hand investigations came in, furnished the bulk of historical and scholarly references and quotations. To this century belong le Nain de See also:Tillemont (1637–1698), whose enormous Histoire des empereurs and Memoires pour servir a l'histoire ecclesiastique served See also:Gibbon and a hundred others as See also:quarry; Charles Dufresne, seigneur de See also:Ducange (1614–1688), whose well-known glossary was only one of numerous productions; Jean See also:Mabillon (1632–1707), one of the most voluminous of the voluminous See also:Benedictines; and Bernard de See also:Montfaucon (1655-1741), chief of all authorities of the dry-as-dust kind on classical See also:archaeology and art. Opening of the z8ih Century.—The beginning of the 18th century is among the dead seasons of French literature. All the greatest men whose names had illustrated the early reign of Louis XIV. in profane literature passed away long before him, and the last if the least of them, Boileau and Thomas Corneille, only survived into the very earliest years of the new age. The political and military disasters of the last years of the reign were accompanied by a state of things in society unfavourable to literary development. The devotion to pure literature and philosophy proper which Descartes and Corneille had inspired had La Bruyere. died out, and the devotion to physical science, to See also:sociology, and to a kind of free-thinking optimism which was to inspire Voltaire and the Encyclopedists had not yet become fashionable. Fenelon and Malebranche still survived, but they were emphatic- ally men of the last age, as was Massillon, though he lived till nearly the middle of the century. The characteristic literary figures of the opening years of the period are d'See also:Aguesseau, See also:Fontenelle, Saint-Simon, personages in many ways interesting and remarkable, but purely transitional in their characteristics. Bernard le Bovier de Fontenelle (1657-1757) is, indeed, perhaps the most typical figure of the time. He was a dramatist, a moralist, a philosopher, physical and metaphysical, a critic, an historian, a poet and a satirist. The manner of his works is always easy and graceful, and their matter rarely contemptible. 18th-Century Poetry.—The dispiriting signs shown during the 17th century by French poetry proper received entire fulfilment in the following age. The two poets who were most prominent at the opening of the period were the abbe de See also:Chaulieu (1639- 1720) and the marquis de la Fare (1644-1712), poetical or rather versifying twins who are always quoted together. They were both men who lived to a great age, yet their characteristics are rather those of their later than of their earlier contemporaries. They derive on the one hand from the somewhat trifling school of Voiture, on the other from the Bacchic See also:sect of Saint-Amant; and they succeed in uniting the inferior qualities of both with the cramped and impoverished though elegant style of which Fenelon had complained. Their compositions are as a rule lyrical, as lyrical poetry was understood after the days of Mal- herbe--that is to say, quatrains of the kind ridiculed by Moliere, and Pindaric odes, which have been justly described as made up of alexandrines after the manner of Boileau cut up into shorter or longer lengths. They were followed, however, by the one poet who succeeded in producing something resembling poetry in this artificial style, J. B. Rousseau (1671-1741). /. E. Rousseau. Rousseau, who in some respects was nothing so little as a religious poet, was nevertheless strongly influenced, as Marot had been, by the Psalms of David. His Odes and his Cantates are perhaps less destitute of that spirit than the work of any other poet of the century excepting See also:Andre See also:Chenier. Rousseau was also an extremely successful epigrammatist, having in this respect, too, resemblances to Marot. Le See also:Franc de See also:Pompignan (1709-1784), to whom Voltaire's well-known sarcasms are not altogether just, and Louis Racine (1692-1763), who wrote pious and altogether forgotten poems, belonged to the same poetical school; though both the style and matter of Racine are strongly tinctured by his Port Royalist sympathies and education. Lighter verse was represented in the 18th century by the long-lived Saint-Aulaire (1643-1742), by Gentil Bernard (1710-1775), by the abbe (afterwards cardinal) de See also:Bernis (1715-1794), by Claude Joseph See also:Dorat (1734-1780), by Antoine See also:Bertin (1752-1790) and by Evariste de See also:Parny (1753-1814), the last the most vigorous, but all somewhat deserving the term applied to Dorat of ver luisant du Parngsse. The jovial traditions of Saint-Amant begat a similar school of anacreontic songsters, which, represented in turn by Charles Francois Panard (1674- 1765), Charles Colle (1709-1783), Armand Gouffe (1775-1845), and Marc-Antoine-Madeleine Desaugiers (1972-1827), led directly to the best of all such writers, See also:Beranger. To this class Rouget de See also:Lisle (1760-1836) perhaps also belongs; though his most famous composition, the Marseillaise, is of a different See also:stamp. Nor is the account of the light verse of the 18th century complete without reference to a long See also:succession of fable writers, who, in an unbroken See also:chain, connect La Fontaine in the i7th century with Viennet in the 19th. None of the links, however, of this chain, with the exception of Jean Pierre See also:Florian (1759-1794) deserve much attention. The universal faculty of Voltaire (1694-1778) showed itself in his poetical productions no less than in his other works, and it is perhaps not least remarkable in verse. It is impossible nowadays to regard the Henriade as anything but a highly successful prize poem, but the burlesque epic of La Pucelle, discreditable as it may be from the moral point of view, is remarkable enough as literature. The epistles and satires are among the best of their kind, the verse tales are in the same way admirable, and the epigrams, impromptus, and short miscellaneous poems generally are the ne plus ultra of verse which is not poetry. The Anglomania of the century extended into poetry, and the Seasons of See also:Thomson set the example of a whole library of tedious descriptive verse, which in its turn revenged France upon England by producing or helping to produce English poems of the See also:Darwin school. The first of these descriptive performances was the Saisons of Jean Francois de Saint-Lambert (1716-1803), identical in title with its model, but of infinitely inferior value. Saint-Lambert was followed by Jacques See also:Delille (1738-1813) in Les Jardins, Antoine Marin le Mierre (1723-1793) in Les Fastes, and Jean Antoine See also:Roucher ( 745-1794) in Les See also:Moir. Indeed, everything that could be de Scribed was seized upon by these describers. Delille also See also:tray dated the Georgics, and for a time was the greatest living poet of France, the title being only disputed by Escouchard le See also:Bun (1729-1807), a lyrist and ode writer of the school of J. B. F ousseau, but not destitute of energy. The only other poets until Chenier who deserve notice are Nicolas See also: Here again the astonishing power and literary aptitude of Voltaire gave value to his attempts in a style which, notwithstanding that it counts Racine among its practitioners, was none the less predestined to failure. Voltaire's own efforts in this kind are indisputably as successful as they could be. Foreigners usually prefer See also:Mahomet and See also:Zaire to Bajazet and Mithridate, though there is no doubt that no work of Voltaire's comes up to Polyeucte and Rodegune, as certainly no single passage in any of his plays can approach the best passages of See also:Cinna and Les Horaces. But the remaining tragic writers of the century, with the single exception of See also:Crebillon pere, are scarcely third-rate. C. Jolyot de Crebillon (1674-1762) himself had genius, and there are to be found in his work evidences of a spirit which had seemed to die away with Saint-Genest, and was hardly to revive until Hernani. Of the imitators of Racine and Voltaire, La Motte in Ines de See also:Castro was not wholly unsuccessful. Francois Joseph de la See also:Grange-See also:Chancel (1677-1758) copied chiefly the worst side of the author of See also:Britannicus, and Bernard Joseph Saurin (1706-1781) and Pierre-See also:Laurent de See also:Belloy (1727.-1775) performed the same service for Voltaire. Le Mierre and La Harpe, mentioned and to be mentioned, were tragedians; but the Iphigenie en Tauride of Guimond de la Touche (1725-1760) deserves more special mention than anything of theirs. There was an infinity of tragic writers and tragic plays in this century, but hardly any others of them even deserve mention. The muse of comedy was decidedly more happy in her devotees. Moliere was a far safer if a more difficult model than Racine, and the inexorable fashion which had See also:bound down tragedy to a feeble imitation of See also:Euripides did not similarly prescribe an undeviating adherence to Terence. Tragedy had never been, has scarcely been since, anything but an See also:exotic in France; comedy was of the Voltaire (poetry). soil and native. Very early in the century Alain Rene le See also:Sage (1668-1747), in the admirable comedy of Turcaret, produced a work not unworthy to stand by the side of all but his master's best. Philippe See also:Destouches (1680-1754) was also a fertile comedy writer in the early years of the century, and in Le Glorieux and Le Philosophe marie achieved considerable success. As the age went on, comedy, always apt to lay hold of passing events, devoted itself to the great struggle between the Philosophes and their opponents. Curiously enough, the party which engrossed almost all the wit of France had the worst of it in this dramatic portion of the contest, if in no other. The Mechant of Gresset and the Metromanie of Alexis See also:Piron (1689-1773) were far superior to anything produced on the other side, and the Philosophes of Charles Palissot de Montenoy (1730-1814), though scurrilous and broadly farcical, had a great success. On the other hand, it was to a Philosophe that the invention of a new dramatic style was due, and still more the promulgation of certain ideas on dramatic criticism and construction, which, after being filtered through the German mind, were to return to France and to exercise the most powerful influence on its dramatic productions. This was Denis See also:Diderot (1713-1784), the most fertile genius of the century, but also the least productive in finished and perfect work. His chief dramas, the Fils naturel and the Pere de famille, are certainly not great successes; the shorter plays, Est-il bon? est-il mechant? and La Piece et le See also:prologue, are better. But it was his follower Michel Jean See also:Sedaine (1719-1797) who, in Le Philosophe sans le savoir and other pieces, produced the best examples of the bourgeois as opposed to the heroic drama. Diderot is sometimes credited or discredited with the invention of the Comedie Larmoyante, a title which indeed his own plays do not altogether refuse, but this special variety seems to be, in its invention, rather the property of Pierre Claude Nivelle de la Chaussee (1692-1754). Comedy sustained itself, and even gained ground towards the end of the century; the Jeune Indienne of Nicolas See also:Chamfort (1741-1794), if not quite worthy of its author's brilliant talent in other paths, is noteworthy, and so is the See also:Billet perdu of Joseph Francois Edouard de Corsembleu Desmahis (1722-1761), while at the extreme limit of our present period there appears the remark-able figure of Pierre Caron de See also:Beaumarchais (1732-1799). The Mariage de See also:Figaro and the See also:Barbier de See also:Seville are well known as having had attributed to them no mean place among the literary causes and forerunners of the Revolution. Their dramatic and literary value would itself have sufficed to obtain attention for them at any time, though there can be no doubt that their popularity was mainly due to their political appositeness. The most remarkable point about them, as about the school of comedy of which See also:Congreve was the chief master in England at the beginning of the century, was the abuse and superfluity of wit in the dialogue, indiscriminately allotted to all characters alike. It is difficult to give particulars, but would be improper to omit all mention, of such dramatic or quasi-dramatic work as the libretti of operas, farces for performance at fairs and the like. French authors of the time from Le Sage downwards usually managed these with remarkable skill. 18th-Century Fiction.—With prose fiction the case was altogether different. We have seen how the short tale of a few pages had already in the 16th century attained high if not the highest excellence; how at three different periods the fancy for long-winded prose narration developed itself in the prose re-handlings of the chivalric poems, in the Amadis romances, and in the portentous recitals of Gomberville and La Calprenede; how burlesques of these romances were produced from Rabelais to Scarron; and how at last Madame de Lafayette showed the way to something like the novel of the day. If we add the fairy story, of which Perrault and Madame d'Aulnoy were the chief practitioners, and a small class of miniature romances, of which Aucassin et Nicolette in the 13th, and the delightful Jehan de Paris (of the 15th or 16th, in which a king of England is patriotic-ally sacrificed) are good representatives, we shall have exhausted the list. The 18th century was See also:quick to develop the system of the author of the Princesse de Cleves, but it did not abandonthe cultivation of the romance, that is to say, fiction dealing with incident and with the simpler passions, in devoting itself to the novel, that is to say, fiction dealing with the See also:analysis of sentiment and character. Le Sage, its first great novelist, in his Diable boiteux and Gil See also:Bias, went to Spain not merely for his subject but also for his inspiration and manner, following the lead of the picaroon romance of Rojas and Scarron. Like See also:Fielding, however, whom he much resembles, Le Sage mingled with the romance of incident the most careful attention to character and the most lively portrayal of it, while his style and language are such as to make his work one of the classics of French literature. The novel of character was really founded in France by the abbe See also:Prevost d'Exilles (1697-1763), the author of See also:Cleveland and of the incomparable Manon Lescaut. The popularity of this style was much helped by the immense vogue in France of the works of See also:Richardson. Side by side with it, however, and for a time enjoying still greater popularity, there flourished a very different school of fiction, of which Voltaire, whose name occupies the first or all but the first place in every branch of literature of his time, was the most brilliant See also:cultivator. This was a direct development of the earlier See also:conte, and consisted usually of the treatment, in a humorous, satirical, and not always over-decent fashion, of contemporary foibles, beliefs, philosophies and occupations. These tales are of every rank of excellence and merit both literary and moral, and range from the astonishing wit, grace and humour of Candide and Zadig to the book which is Diderot's one hardly pardonable See also:sin, and the similar but more lively efforts of Crebillon fils (1707-1777). These latter deeps led in their turn to the still lower depths of La Clos and Louvet. A third class of 18th-century fiction consists of attempts to return to the humorous fatrasie of the 16th century, attempts which were as much influenced by Sterne as the sentimental novel was by Richardson. The Homme aux quarante ecus of Voltaire has something of this character, but the most characteristic works of the style are the Jacques le fataliste of Diderot, which shows it nearly at its best, and the Compere Mathieu, sometimes attributed to Pigault-See also:Lebrun (1753-1835), but no doubt in reality due to Jacques du See also:Laurens (1719-1797), which shows it at perhaps its worst. Another remarkable story-See also:teller was See also:Cazotte (1719-1792), whose Diable amoureux displays much fantastic power, and connects itself with a singular fancy of the time for occult studies and diablerie, manifested later by the patronage shown to See also:Cagliostro, See also:Mesmer, St Germain and others. In this connexion, too, may perhaps also be mentioned most appropriately Bestif de la Bretonne, a remarkably original and voluminous writer, who was little noticed by his contemporaries and successors for the best part of a century. See also:Restif, who was nicknamed the " Rousseau of the See also:gutter," Rousseau du ruisseau, presents to an English imagination many of the characteristics of a non-moral See also:Defoe. While these various schools busied themselves more or less with real life seriously depicted or purposely travestied, the great vogue and success of Teletnaque produced a certain number of didactic works, in which moral or historical information was sought to be conveyed under a more or less thin guise of fiction. Such was the Voyage du jeune See also:Anacharsis of Jean Jacques See also:Barthelemy (1716-1795); such the Numa Pompilius and Gonzalve de Cordoue of Florian (1755-1794), who also deserves notice as a writer of pastorals, fables and short prose tales; such the Belisaire and Les Incas of Jean Francois See also:Marmontel (1723-1799). Between this class and that of the novel of sentiment may perhaps be placed Paul et Virginie and La Chaumiere indienne; though Bernardin de Saint-Pierre (1737-1814) should more properly be noticed after Rousseau and as a moralist. Diderot's fiction-writing has already been referred to more than once, but his Religieuse deserves See also:citation here as a powerful specimen of the novel both of analysis and polemic; while his undoubted masterpiece, the Neveu de See also:Rameau, though very difficult to class, comes under this head as well as under any other. There are, however, two of the novelists of this age, and of the most remarkable, who have yet to be noticed, and these are the author of Marianne and the author of Julie. We do
Diderot (plays).
not mention Pierre de See also:Marivaux (1688–1763) in this connexion as the equal of Jean Jacques Rousseau (1712–1778), but merely as being in his way almost equally original and equally remote from any suspicion of school influence. He began with burlesque writing, and was also the author of several comedies, of which Les Fausses Confidences is the principal. But it is in prose fiction that he really excels. He may claim to have, at least in the opinion of his contemporaries, invented a style, though perhaps the term marivaudage, which was applied to it, has a not altogether complimentary See also:connotation. He may claim also to have invented the novel without a purpose, which aims simply at amusement, and at the same time does not seek to attain that end by buffoonery or by satire. See also: J. Rousseau. importance. His two great works, the Nouvelle Heloise and Emile, are as far as possible from being perfect as novels. But no novels in the world have ever had such influence as these. To a great extent this influence was due mainly to their attractions as novels, imperfect though they may be in this character, but it was beyond dispute also owing to the doctrines which they contained, and which were exhibited in novel form. Such are the principal developments of fiction during the century; but it is remarkable that, varied as they were, and excellent as was some of the work to which they gave rise, none of these schools was directly very fertile in results or successors. The period with which we shall next have to deal, that from the outbreak of the Revolution to the death of Louis XVIII., is curiously barren of fiction of any merit. It was not till English influence began again to assert itself in the later days of the Restoration that the prose romance began once more to be written. 18th-Century History.—It is not, however, in any of the departments of belles-lettres that the real eminence of the 18th century as a time of literary production in France consists. In all serious branches of study its accomplishments were, from a literary point of view, remarkable, uniting as it did an extra-ordinary power of popular and literary expression with an ardent spirit of inquiry, a great speculative ability, and even a far more considerable amount of laborious erudition than is generally supposed. The historical studies and results of 18th-century speculation in France are of especial and peculiar importance. There is no doubt that what is called the science of history dates from this time, and though the beginning of it is usually assigned to the Italian See also:Vico, its complete indication may perhaps with equal or greater justice be claimed by the Frenchman See also:Turgot. Before Turgot, however, there were great names in French historical writing, and perhaps the greatest of all is that of Charles Secondat de Montesquieu (1689–1755). The three principal works of this great writer are all historical and at the same time political in character. In the Lettres persanes he handled, with wit inferior to the wit of no other writer even in that witty age, the corruptions and dangers of contemporary morals and politics. The literary charm of this book—the plan of which was suggested by a work, the Amusements serieux el comiques, of Dufresny (1648–1724), a comic writer not destitute of merit—is very great, and its plan was so popular as to lead to a thousand imitations, of which all, except those of Voltaire and See also:Goldsmith, only bring out the immense superiority of the original. Few things could be more different from this lively and popular book than Montesquieu's next work, the Grandeur et decadence des Romains, in which the same acuteness and knowledge of human nature are united with considerable erudition,and with a weighty though perhaps somewhat grandiloquent and rhetorical style. His third and greatest work, the Esprit des lois, is again different both in style and character, and such defects as it has are as nothing when compared with the meritsof its fertility in ideas, its splendid breadth of view, and the felicity with which the author, in a manner unknown before, recognizes the laws underlying complicated assemblages of fact. The style of this great work is equal to its substance; less light than that of the Lettres, less rhetorical than that of the Grandeur des Romains, it is still a marvellous union of dignity and wit. Around Montesquieu, partly before and partly after him, is a group of philosophical or at least systematic historians, of whom the chief are Jean Baptiste See also:Dubos (1670-1742), and G. Bonnot de Mably (1709–1785). Dubos, whose chief work is not historical but aesthetic (Reflexions sur la poesie et la peinture), wrote a so-called Histoire critique de i'etablissement de la monarchie francaise, which is as far as possible from being in the modern sense critical, inasmuch as, in the See also:teeth of history, and in order to exalt the Tiers Nat, it pretends an amicable See also:coalition of Franks and Gauls, and not an irruption by the former. Mably (Observations sur l'histoire de la France) had a much greater influence than either of these writers, and a decidedly mischievous one, especially at the period of the Revolution. He, more than any one else, is responsible for the ignorant and childish extolling of Greek and Roman institutions, and the still more ignorant depreciation of the middle ages, which was for a time characteristic of French politicians. Montesquieu was, as we have said, followed by Anne Robert Jacques Turgot (1727–1781), whose writings are few in number, and not remarkable for style, but full of original thought. Turgot in his turn was followed by See also:Condorcet (1743–1794), whose tendency is somewhat more sociological than directly historical. Towards the end of the period, too, a considerable number of philosophical histories were written, the usual object of which was, under See also:cover of a kind of allegory, to satirize and attack the existing institutions and government of France. The most famous of these was the Histoire des Indes, nominally written by the Abbe Guillaume Thomas Francois See also:Raynal (1713–1796), but really the joint work of many members of the Philosophe party, especially Diderot. Side by side with this really or nominally philosophical school of history there existed another and less ambitious school, which contented itself with the older and simpler view of the science. The Abbe Rene de Vertot (1655–1735) belongs almost as much to the 17th as to the 18th century; but his principal works, especially the famous Histoire des Chevaliers de Matte, date from the later period, as do also the Revolutions romaines. Vertot is above all things a literary historian, and the well-known " Mon siege est fait," whether true or not, certainly expresses his system. Of the same school, though far more comprehensive, was the laborious Charles See also:Rollin (1661–1741), whose works in the original, or translated and continued in the case of the Histoire romaine by Jean Baptiste Louis See also:Crevier (1693-1765), were long the chief historical manuals of Europe. The See also:president Charles Jean Francois See also:Henault (1685–1770), and Louis Pierre See also:Anquetil (1723–1806) were praiseworthy writers, the first of French history, the second of that and much else. In the same class, too, far superior as is his literary power, must be ranked the historical works of Voltaire, Charles XII, Pierre le Grand, &c. A very perfect example of the historian who is literary first of all is supplied by Claude See also:Carloman de See also:Rulhiere (1735–1791), whose Revolution en Russie en 1762 is one of the little masterpieces of history, while his larger and See also:posthumous work on the last days of the Polish kingdom exhibits perhaps some of the defects of this class of historians. Lastly must be mentioned the memoirs and correspondence of the period, the materials of history if not history itself. The century opened with the most famous of all these, the memoirs of the duc de Saint-Simon (1675–1755), an extraordinary series of pictures of the court of Louis XIV. and the Regency, written in an unequal and incorrect style, but with something of the irregular excellence of the great 16th-century writers, and most striking in the sombre bitterness of its tone. The subsequent and less remarkable memoirs of the century are so numerous that it is almost impossible to select a few for reference, and altogether impossible to mention all. Of those bearing on public history the memoirs of Madame de Sta. el (Mlle See also:Delaunay) (1684-1750), of Pierre Louis de Voyer, marquis d'See also:Argenson (1694–1757), of Charles Pinot See also:Duclos (1704–1772), of Stephanie Felicite de Saint-See also:Aubin, Madame de Geniis (1746–1830), of Pierre Victor de Besenval (1722–1791), of Madame See also:Campan (1752–1822) and of the cardinal de Bernis (1715–1794), may perhaps be selected for mention; of those bearing on literary and private history, the memoirs of Madame d'See also:Epinay (1726–1783), those of Mathieu Marais (1664–1737) the so-called Memoires secrets of Louis Petit de See also:Bachaumont (1690–1770), and the innumerable writings having reference to Voltaire and to the Philosophe party generally. Here, too, may be mentioned a remarkable class of literature, consisting of purely private and almost confidential letters, which were written at this time with very remarkable literary excellence. As specimens may be selected those of Mademoiselle Aisse (1694–1757), which are models of easy and unaffected tenderness, and those of Mademoiselle de See also:Lespinasse (1732–1776) the companion of Madame du See also:Deffand and afterwards of d'See also:Alembert. These latter, in their extraordinary fervour and passion, not merely contrast strongly with the generally languid and frivolous gallantry of the age, but also constitute one of its most remarkable literary monuments. It has been said of them that they " See also:burn the paper," and the expression is not exaggerated. Madame du Deffand's (1697–1780) own letters, many of which were written to Horace See also:Walpole, are noteworthy in a very different way. Of lighter letters the charming correspondence of Diderot with Mademoiselle Voland deserves special mention. But the correspondence, like the memoirs of this century, defies justice to be done to it in any cursory or limited mention. In this connexion, however, it may be well to mention some of the most remarkable works of the time, the Confessions, Reveries, and Promenades d'un See also:solitaire of Rousseau. In these works, especially in the Confessions, there is not merely exhibited passion as fervid though perhaps less unaffected than that of Mademoiselle de Lespinasse—there appear in them two literary characteristics which, if not entirely novel, were for the first time brought out deliberately by powers of the first order, were for the first time made the mainspring of literary interest, and thereby set an example which for more than a century has been persistently followed, and which has produced some of the finest results of modern literature. The first of these was the elaborate and unsparing analysis and display of the motives, the weaknesses and the failings of individual character. This process, which Rousseau unflinchingly performed on himself, has been followed usually in respect to fictitious characters by his successors. The other novelty was the feeling for natural beauty and the elaborate description of it, the credit of which latter must, it has been agreed by all impartial critics, be assigned rather to Rousseau than to any other writer. His influence in this direction was, however, soon taken up and continued by Bernardin de Saint-Pierre, the connecting link between Rousseau and See also:Chateaubriand, some of whose works have been already alluded to. In particular the author of Paul et Virginie set himself to develop the example of description which Rousseau had set, and his word-paintings, though less powerful than those of his model, are more abundant, more elaborate, and animated by a more amiable spirit. 18th-Century Philosophy.—The Anglomania which distinguished the time was nowhere more stongly shown than in the cast and direction of its philosophical speculations. As Montesquieu and Voltaire had imported into France a vivid theoretical admiration for the See also:British constitution and for British theories in politics, so Voltaire, Diderot and a crowd of others popularized and continued in France the philosophical ideas of Hobbes and Locke and even Berkeley, the theological ideas of See also:Bolingbroke, See also:Shaftesbury and the English deists, and the physical discoveries of See also:Newton. Descartes, Frenchman and genius as he was, and though his principles in physics and philosophy were long clung to in the schools, was completely abandoned by the more adventurous and progressive See also:spirits. At no time indeed, owing to the confusion of thought and purpose to which we have already alluded, was the word philosophy used with greater looseness than at this time. Using it, as we have hitherto used it, in the sense of metaphysics, the majority of the Philosophes have verylittle claim to their title. There were some who manifested, however, an aptitude for purely philosophical argument, and one who confined himself strictly thereto. Among these the most remarkable are See also:Julien Offroy de la Mettrie (1709–1751) and Denis Diderot. La Mettrie in his works L'Homme machine, L'Homme plante, &c., applied a lively and vigorous imagination, a considerable familiarity with physics and See also:medicine, and a brilliant but unequal style, to the task of advocating materialistic ideas on the constitution of man. Diderot, in a series of early works, Lettre sur les aveugles, See also:Promenade d'un sceptique, Pensees philosophiques, &c., exhibited a good acquaintance with philosophical history and opinion, and gave sign in this direction, as in so many others, of a far-reaching See also:intellect. As in almost all his works, however, the value of the thought is extremely unequal, while the different pieces, always written in the hottest haste, and never duly matured or corrected, present but few specimens of finished and polished writing. Charles See also:Bonnet (1720–1793), a Swiss of Geneva, wrote a large number of works, many of which are purely scientific. Others, however, are more psychological, and these, though advocating the materialistic philosophy generally in vogue, were remarkable for uniting See also:materialism with an honest adherence to Christianity. The half mystical writer, Louis Claude de Saint-See also: Very rarely has orthodoxy been so badly defended as at this time. The literary championship of the church was entirely in the hands of the Jesuits, and of a few disreputable literary free-lances like See also:Elie See also:Freron (1719–1776) and Pierre Francois Guyot, abbe See also:Desfontaines (1685–1745). The Jesuits were learned enough, and their principal See also:journal, that of Trevoux, was conducted with much vigour and a great deal of erudition. But they were in the first place discredited by the moral taint which has always hung over Jesuitism, and in the second place by the persecutions of the Jansenists and the Protestants, which were attributed to their influence. But one single work on the orthodox side has pre-served the least reputation; while, on the other hand, the names of Pere Nonotte (1711–1793) and several of his fellows have been enshrined unenviably in the imperishable ridicule of Voltaire, one only of whose adversaries, the abbe Antoine Guenee (1717–1803), was able to meet him in the Lettres de quelques Juifs with something like his own weapons. It has never been at all accurately decided how far what may be called the scoffing voltaim school of Voltaire represents a direct revolt against (theology). Christianity, and how far it was merely a kind of guerilla warfare against the clergy. It is positively certain that Voltaire was not an atheist, and that he did not approve of atheism. But his Dictionnaire philosophique, which is typical of a vast amount of contemporary and subsequent literature, consists of a heterogeneous assemblage of articles directed against various points of See also:dogma and See also:ritual and various characteristics of the sacred records. From the literary point of view, it is one of the most characteristic of all Voltaire's works, though it is perhaps not entirely his. The desultory arrangement, the light and lively style, the extensive but not always too accurate erudition, and the somewhat captious and quibbling objections, are intensely Voltairian. But there is little seriousness about it, and certainly no kind of rancorous or deep-seated hostility. With many, however, of Voltaire's pupils and younger contemporaries the case was altered. They were distinctively atheists and anti-supernaturalists. The atheism of Diderot, unquestionably the greatest of them all, has been keenly debated; but in the case of Etienne Damilaville (1723–1768), Jacques Andre Naigeon (1738–1810), Paul Henri See also:Dietrich, baron d'See also:Holbach, and others there is no See also:room for doubt. By these persons a great mass of atheistic and anti-Christian literature was composed and set afloat. The characteristic work of this school, its last word indeed, is the famous Systeme de la nature, The attributed to Holbach (1723–1789), but known to be, otNature See also:ret ." in part at least, the work of Diderot. In this remark- able work, which caps the climax of the metaphysical materialism or rather See also:nihilism of the century, the atheistic position is clearly put. It made an immense sensation; and it so fluttered not merely the orthodox but the more moderate free-thinkers, that See also:Frederick of See also:Prussia and Voltaire, perhaps the most singular pair of defenders that orthodoxy ever had, actually set themselves to refute it. Its style and argument are very unequal, as books written in collaboration are apt to be, and especially books in which Diderot, the See also:paragon of inequality, had a hand. But there is an almost entire absence of the heterogeneous assemblage of anecdotes, jokes good and bad, scraps of accurate or inaccurate physical science, and other incongruous matter with which the Philosophes were wont to stuff their works; and lastly, there is in the best passages a kind of sombre grandeur which recalls the manner as well as the matter of See also:Lucretius. It is perhaps well to repeat, in the case of so notorious a book, that this criticism is of a purely literary and formal character; but there is little doubt that the literary merits of the work considerably assisted its didactic influence. As the Revolution approached, and the victory of the Philosophe party was declared, there appeared for a brief space a group of cynical and accomplished phrase-makers presenting some similarity to that of which, a hundred years before, Saint-Evremond was the most prominent figure. The chief of thi3 group were Nicolas Chamfort (1747–1794) on the republican side, Chamfort. and AntoineRivarol(1753–18o1)onthatof the royalists. See also:Ware. Like the older writer to whom we have compared them, neither can be said to have produced any one work of eminence, and in this they stand distinguished from moralists like La Rochefoucauld. The floating sayings, however, which are attributed to them, or which occur here and there in their miscellaneous work, yield in no respect to those of the most famous of their predecessors in wit and a certain kind of wisdom, though they are frequently more personal than aphoristic. 18th-Century Moralists and Politicians.—Not the least part, however, of the energy of the period in thought and writing was devoted to questions of a directly moral and political kind. With regard to morality proper the favourite doctrine of the century was what is commonly called the selfish theory, the only one indeed which was suitable to the sensationalism of Condillac and the materialism of Holbach. The pattern book of this ttetv6ttus. doctrine was the De l'esprit of Claude Adrien Helvetius (1715–1771), the most amusing book perhaps which ever pretended to the title of a solemn philosophical treatise. There is some See also:analogy between the principles of this work and those of the Sys/See also:erne de la nature. With the inconsistency—some would say with the questionable honesty—which distinguished the more famous members of the Philosophe party when their disciples spoke with what they considered imprudent outspokenness, Voltaire and even Diderot attacked Helvetius as the former afterwards attacked Holbach. But whatever may be the general value of De l'esprit, it is full of acuteness, though Thomas. that acuteness is as desultory and disjointed as its style. As Helvetius may be taken as the representative author of the cynical school, so perhaps Alexandre Gerard Thomas (1932–1785) may be taken as representative of thevotaries of noble sentiment to whom we have also alluded. The works of Thomas chiefly took the form of academic eloges or formal panegyrics, and they have all the defects, both in manner and substance, which are associated with that style. Of yet a third school, corresponding in form to La Rochefoucauld and La Bruyere, and possessed of some of the antique vigour of preceding centuries, was Luc de Clapiers, marquis de See also:Vauvenargues (1715–1947). This writer, who died
very young, has produced maxims and reflections argues.
Vauven'
of considerable mental force and literary finish. From
Voltaire downwards it has been usual to compare him with Pascal, from whom he is chiefly distinguished by a striking but somewhat empty stoicism. Between the moralists, of whom we have taken these three as examples, and the politicians may be placed Rousseau, who in his novels and miscellaneous works is of the first class, in his famous Contrat social of the second. All his theories, whatever their originality and whatever their value, were made novel and influential by the force of their statement and the literary beauties of its form. Of direct and avowed political writings there were few during the century, and none of anything like the importance of the Contrat social, theoretical acceptance of the established French constitution being a point of necessity with all Frenchmen. Nevertheless it may be said that almost the whole of the voluminous writings of the Philosophes, even of those who, like Voltaire, were sincerely aristocratic and monarchic in predilection, were of more or less veiled political significance. There was one branch of political writing, moreover,which could be indulged in without much fear. Political economy and administrative theories received much attention. The earliest writer of eminence on these subjects was the great engineer Sebastien le Prestre, marquis de See also:Vauban (1633–1707), whose Oisivetes and See also:Dime royale exhibit both great ability and extensive observation. A more utopian economist of the same time was Charles Irenee See also:Castel, abbe de Saint-Pierre (1658–1743), not to be confounded with the author of Paul et Virginie. Soon political economy in the hands of Francois See also:Quesnay(1694–1774)took a regular form, and towards the middle of the century a great number of works on questions connected with it, especially that of free See also:trade in See also:corn, on which See also: Of writers on legal subjects and of the legal profession, the century, though not less fertile than in other directions, produced few or none of any great importance from the literary point of view. The chief name which in this connexion is known is that of Chancellor Henri Francois d'Aguesseau (1668-1751), at the beginning of the century, an estimable writer of the Port Royal school, who took the orthodox side in the great disputes of the time, but failed to display any great ability therein. He was, as became his profession, more remarkable as an orator than a writer, and his works contain valuable testimonies to the especially perturbed and unquiet condition of his century—a disquiet which is perhaps also its chief literary note. There were other French magistrates, such as Montesquieu, Henault (1685–1770), de See also:Brosses (1706–1773) and others, who made considerable mark in literature; but it was usually (except in the case of Montesquieu) in subjects not even indirectly connected with their profession. The Esprit des lois. stands alone; but as an example of work barristerial in kind, famous partly for political reasons but of some real literary merit, we may mention the Memoire for See also:Calas written by J. B. J. Elie de See also:Beaumont (1732–1786). 18th-Century Criticism and Periodical Literature.--Wehave said that literary criticism assumes in this century a sufficient importance to be treated under a separate heading. Contributions were made to it of many different kinds and from many different points of view. Periodical literature, the chief stimulus to its production, began more and more to come into favour. Even in the 17th century the Journal des savants, the Jesuit Journal de Trevoux, and other publications had set the example of different kinds of it. Just before the Revolution the See also:Gazette de France was in the hands of J. B. A. Suard (1734-1817), a man who was nothing if not a literary critic. Perhaps, however, the most remarkable contribution of the century to criticism of the periodical kind was the Feuilles de See also:Grimm, a circular sent for many years to the German courts by See also:Frederic Melchior Grimm (1723-1807), the comrade of Diderot and Rousseau, and containing a compte rendu of the ways and works of Paris, literary and artistic as well as social. These Leaves not only include much excellent literary criticism by Diderot, but also gave occasion to the incomparable salons or accounts of the.See also:exhibition of pictures from the same hand, essays which founded the art of picture criticism, and which have hardly been surpassed since. The prize competitions of the Academy were also a considerable stimulus to literary criticism, though the prevailing taste in such compositions rather inclined to elegant themes than to careful studies of analyses. The most characteristic critic of the See also:mid-century was the abbe Charles See also:Batteux (1713–1780) who illustrated a tendency of the time by beginning with a treatise on Les See also:Beaux Arts reduits dun meme Principe (1746); reduced it and others into Principes de la liteerature (1764) and added in 1 7 71 Les Quatres Poetiques (Aristotle, Horace, See also:Vida and Boileau). Batteux is a very ingenious critic and his attempt to con-ciliate " taste " and " the rules," though inadequate, is interesting. Works on the arts in general or on special divisions of them were not wanting, as, for instance, that of Dubos before alluded to, the Essai sur la peinture of Diderot and others. Critically annotated editions of the great French writers also came into fashion, and were no longer written by mere pedants. Of these Voltaire's edition of Corneille was the most remarkable, and his annotations, united separately under the title of Commentaire sur Corneille, form not the least important portion of his works. Even. older writers, looked down upon though they were by the general taste of the day, received a share of this critical interest. In the earlier portion of the century Nicolas Lenglet-Dufresnoy (1674–1755) and Bernard de la Monnoye (1641–1728) devoted their attention to Rabelais, Regnier, Villon, Marot and others. Etienne Barbazan (1696–1770) and P. J. B. Le Grand d'Aussy (1737–1800) gathered and brought into notice the long scattered and unknown rather than neglected fabliaux of the middle ages. Even the chansons de geste attracted the notice of the Comte de See also:Caylus (1692–1765) and the Comte de Tressan (1705–1783). The latter, in his Bibliotheque des romans, worked up a large number of the old epics into a form suited to the taste of the century. In his hands they became lively tales of the kind suited to readers of Voltaire and Crebillon. But in this travestied form they had considerable influence both in France and abroad. By these publications attention was at least called to early French literature, and when it had been once called, a more serious and appreciative study became merely a matter of time. The method of much of the literary criticism of the close of this period was indeed deplorable enough. Jean Francois de la Harpe (1739–1803), who though a little later in time as to most of his critical productions is perhaps its most representative figure, shows criticism in one of its worst forms. The critic specially abhorred by Sterne, who looked only at the stop-See also:watch, was a kind of prophecy of La Harpe, who lays it down distinctly that a beauty, however beautiful, produced in spite of rules is a "monstrous beauty" and cannot be allowed. But such a writer is a natural enough expression of an expiring principle. The year after the death of La Harpe Sainte-Beuve was born. x8th-Century Savants.—In science and general erudition the 18th century in France was at first much occupied with the mathematical studies for which the French genius is so peculiarly adapted, which the great discoveries of Descartes had made possible and popular, and which those of his supplanter Newton only made more popular still. Voltaire took to himself the credit, which he fairly deserves, of first introducing the Newtonian system into France, and it was soon widely popular—even ladies devoting themselves to the exposition of mathematical subjects, as in the case of Gabrielle de See also:Breteuil, marquise du See also:Chatelet (1706–1749) Voltaire's " divine Emilie." Indeed ladies played a great part in the literary and scientific activity of the century, by actual contribution sometimes, but still more by continuing and extending the tradition of " salons." The duchesse du Maine, Mesdames de Lambert, de See also:Tencin, See also:Geoffrin, du Deffand, See also:Necker, and above all, the baronne d' Holbach (whose See also:husband, however, was here the principal personage) presided over coteries which became more and more " philosophical." Many of the greatest mathematicians of the age, such as de Moivre and See also:Laplace, were French by birth, while others like See also:Euler belonged to French-speaking races, and wrote in French. The physical sciences were also ardently cultivated, the impulse to them being given partly by the generally materialistic tendency of the age, partly by the Newtonian system, and partly also by the extended knowledge of the world provided by the circumnavigatory voyage of Louis Antoine de See also:Bougainville (1729–1811), and other travels. P. L. de See also:Moreau See also:Maupertuis (1698–1759) and C. M. de la Condamine (1701–1774) made long journeys for scientific purposes and duly recorded their experiences. The former, a mathematician and physicist of some ability but more oddity, is chiefly known to literature by the ridicule of Voltaire in the Diatribe du Docteur Akakia. Jean le Rond, called d'Alembert (1717-1783), a great mathematician and a writer of considerable though rather academic excellence, is principally known from his connexion with and introduction to the Encyclopedie, of which more presently. See also:Chemistry was also assiduously cultivated, the baron d' Holbach, among others, being a devotee thereof, and helping to advance the science to the point where, at the conclusion of the century, it was illustrated by Berthollet and See also:Lavoisier. During all this devotion to science in its modern acceptation, the older and more literary forms of erudition were not neglected, especially by the illustrious Benedictines of the See also:abbey of St Maur. Dom Augustin See also:Calmet (1672–1757) the author of the well-known Dictionary of the Bible, belonged to this order, and to them also (in particular to Dom See also:Rivet) was due the beginning of the immense Histoire litteraire de la France, a work interrupted by the Revolution and long suspended, but diligently continued since the middle of the 19th century. Of less orthodox names distinguished for erudition, Nicolas See also:Freret (1688–1749), secretary of the Academy, is perhaps the most remarkable. But in the See also:consideration of the science and learning in the 18th century from a literary point of view, there is one name and one book which require particular and, in the case of the *book, somewhat extended mention. The man is Georges Louis Leclerc, comte de See also:Buffon (1717–1788), the book the Encyclopedia. The immense Natural History of Buffon, though not entirely his own, is a remarkable See also:monument Buffon. of the union of scientific tastes with literary ability. As has happened in many similar instances, there is in parts more literature than science to be found in it; and from the point of view of the latter, Buffon was far too careless in observation and far too solicitous of perfection of style and grandiosity of view. The style of Buffon has sometimes been made the subject of the highest eulogy, and it is at its best admirable; but one still feels in it the fault of all serious French prose in this century before Rousseau—the presence, that is to say, of an artificial spirit rather than of natural variety and power. The Encyclopedie, unquestionably on the whole the most imPortant French literary production of the centur Icy- Y, clTheopZle 1d1e. if we except the works of Rousseau and Voltaire, was conducted for a time by Diderot and d'Alembert, afterwards by Diderot alone. It numbered among its contributors almost every Frenchman of eminence in letters. It is often spoken of as if, under the guise of an encyclopaedia, it had been merely a plaidoyer against religion, but this is entirely erroneous. Whatever anti-ecclesiastical See also:bent some of the articles may have, the book as a whole is simply what it professes to be, a .dictionary—that is to say, not merely an historical and critical See also:lexicon, like those of Bayle and Moreri (indeed history and See also:biography were nominally excluded), but a dictionary of arts, sciences, trades and technical terms. Diderot himself had perhaps the greatest faculty of any man that ever lived for the literary treatment in a workman-like manner of the most heterogeneous and in some cases rebellious subjects; and his untiring labour, not merely in writing original articles, but in editing the contributions of others, determined the character of the whole work. There is no doubt that it had, quite independently of any theological or political influence, an immense share in diffusing and gratifying the taste for general information. 1789-183o—General Sketch.—The period which elapsed between the outbreak of the Revolution and the accession of Charles X. has often been considered a sterile one in point of literature. As far as mere productiveness goes, this judgment is hardly correct. No class of literature was altogether neglected during these stirring five-and-thirty years, the political events of which have so engrossed the attention of posterity that it has sometimes been necessary for historians to remind us that during the height of the Terror and the final disasters of the empire the theatres were open and the booksellers' shops patronized. Journalism, See also:parliamentary eloquence and scientific writing were especially cultivated, and the former in its modern sense may almost be said to have been created. But of the higher products of literature the period may justly be considered to have been somewhat barren. During the earlier part of it there is, with the exception of Andre Chenier, not a single name of the first or even second order of excellence. Towards the midst those of Chateaubriand (1768-1848) and Madame ie See also:Stael (1766-1817) stand almost alone; and at the close those of See also:Courier, Beranger and Lamartine are not seconded by any others to tell of the magnificent literary burst which was to follow the publication of See also:Cromwell. Of all departments of literature, poetry proper was worst represented during this period. Andre Chenier was silenced at its opening by the guillotine. Le Brun and Delille, favoured by an extraordinary See also:longevity, continued to be admired and followed. It was the palmy time of descriptive poetry. Louis, marquis de See also:Fontanes (1757-1821, who deserves rather more special notice as a critic and an official See also:patron of literature), Castel, Boisjolin, Esmenard, Berchoux, See also:Ricard, Martin, Gudin, Cournaud, are names which chiefly survive as those of the authors of scattered attempts to turn the Encyclopaedia into verse. Charles Julien de See also:Chenedolle (1769--1833) owes his reputation rather to amiability, and to his association with men eminent in different ways, such as See also:Rivarol and Joubert, than to any real power. He has been regarded as a precursor of Lamartine; but the resemblance is chiefly on Lamartine's weakest side; and the stress laid on him recently, as on Lamartine himself and even on Chenier, is part of a passing reaction against the school of Hugo. Even more ambitiously, Luce de Lancival, Campenon, Dumesnil and Parseval de Grand-Maison endeavoured to write epics, and succeeded rather worse than the Chapelains and Desmarets of the 17th century. The characteristic of all this poetry was the description of everything in metaphor and See also:paraphrase, and the careful avoidance of any-thing like directness of expression; and the historians of the Romantic movement have collected many instances of this absurdity. Lamartine will be more properly noticed in the next division. But about the same time as Lamartine, and towards the end of the present period, there appeared a poet who may be regarded as the last important See also:echo of Malherbe. This was Casimir See also:Delavigne (1793-1843), the author of Les Messeniennes, a writer of very great talent, and, according to the measure of J. B. Rousseau and Lebrun, no mean poet. It is usual to reckon Delavigne as transitionary between the two schools, but in strictness he must be counted with the classicists. Dramatic poetry exhibited somewhat similar characteristics. The system of tragedy writing had become purely mechanical, and every act, almost every See also:scene and situation, had its regular and appropriate business and language, the former of which the poet was not supposed to alter at all, and the latter only very slightly. Poinsinet, La Harpe, M. J. Chenier, See also:Raynouard, deJouy, Briffaut, Baour-Lormian, all wrote in this style. Of these Chenier (1764-1811) had some of the vigour of his brother Andre, from whom he was distinguished by more popular political principles and better fortune. On the other hand, Jean Francois See also:Ducis (1733-1816), who passes with Englishmen as a feeble reducer of Shakespeare to classical rules, passed with his contemporaries as an introducer into French poetry of strange and revolutionary novelties. Comedy, on the other hand, fared better, as indeedit had always fared. See also:Fabre d'Eglantine (1755-1794) (the companion in death of See also:Danton), See also:Collin d'Harleville(r 755-18o6), Francois G. J. S. See also:Andrieux (1759-1833), See also:Picard, Alexandre See also:Duval, and Nepomucene See also:Lemercier (1771-1840) (the most vigorous of all as a poet and a critic of mark) were the comic authors of the period, and their works have not suffered the complete See also:eclipse of the contemporary tragedies which in part they also wrote. If not exactly worthy successors of 11'Ioliere, they are at any rate not unworthy See also:children of Beaumarchais. In romance writing there is again, until we come to Madame de Stael, a great want of originality and even of excellence in workmanship. The works of Madame de See also:Genlis (1746-1830) exhibit the tendencies of the 18th century to platitude and noble sentiment at their worst. Madame See also:Cottin (1770-1807), Madame de Souza (1761-1836), and Madame de See also:Krudener, exhibited some of the qualities of Madame de Lafayette and more of those of Madame de Genlis. Joseph Fievee (1767-1839), in Le Dot de Suzette and other works, showed some power over the domestic story; but perhaps the most remarkable work in point of originality of the time was See also:Xavier de See also:Maistre's (1763-1852) Voyage autour de ma chambre, an attempt in quite a new style, which has been happily followed up by other writers. Turning to history we find comparatively little written at this period. Indeed, until quite its close, men were too much occupied in making history to have time to write it. There is, however, a considerable body of memoir writers, especially in the earlier years of the period, and some great names appear even in history proper. Many of See also:Sismondi's (1773-1842) best works were produced during the empire. A. G. P. Brugiere, baron de See also:Barante (1782-1866), though his best-known works date much later, belongs partially to this time. On the other hand, the production of philosophical writing, especially in what we may See also:call applied philosophy, was considerable. The sensationalist views of Condillac were first continued as by Destutt de See also:Tracy (1754-1836) and Laromiguiere (1756-1837) and subsequently opposed, in consequence partly of a religious and spiritualist revival, partly of the influence of foreign schools of thought, especially the German and the Scotch. The chief philosophical writers from this latter point of view were Pierre Paul Royer Collard (1763-1845), F. P. G. Maine de Biran (1776-1824), and Theodore Simon See also:Jouffroy (1796-1842). Their influence on literature, however, was altogether inferior to that of the reactionist school, of whom Louis Gabriel, vicomte de See also:Bonald (1754-1840), and Joseph de Maistre (1753-1821) were the great leaders. These latter were strongly political in their tendencies, and political philosophy received, as was natural, a large share of the attention of the time. In continuation of the work of the Philosophes, the most remarkable writer was Constantin Francois Chasseboeuf, comte de See also:Volney (1757-1820), whose Ruines are generally known. On the other hand, others belonging to that school, such as Necker and Morellet, wrote from the moderate point of view against revolutionary excesses. Of the reactionists Bonald is extremely royalist, and carries out in his Legislations primitives somewhat the same patriarchal and absolutist theories as our own See also:Filmer, but with infinitely greater genius. As Bonald is royalist and aristocratic, so Maistre. Maistre is the See also:advocate of a See also:theocracy pure and simple, with the pope for its earthly head, and a vigorous See also:despot-ism for its system of government. Pierre Simon See also:Ballanche (1776-1847), often mentioned in the literary memoirs of his time, wrote among other things Essais de palingenesie sociale, good in style but vague in substance. Of theology proper there is almost necessarily little or nothing, the clergy being in the earlier period proscribed, in the latter part kept in a strict and somewhat discreditable subjection by the Empire. In moralizing literature there is one work of the very highest excellence, which, though not published till long afterwards, belongs in point of composition to this period. This is the Pensees of Joseph Joubert (1754-1824), the most illustrious successor of Pascal and Vauvenargues, and to be ranked perhaps /ou6ere above both in the literary finish of his maxims, and certainly above Vauvenargues in the breadth and depth of thought which they exhibit. In pure literary criticism more particularly, Joubert, though exhibiting some inconsistencies due to his time, is astonishingly penetrating and suggestive. Of science and erudition the time was fruitful. At an early period of it appeared the remarkable work of Pierre See also:Cabanis(1757-18o8),the Rapports du physique et du morale de l'homme, a work in which See also:physiology is treated from the extreme materialist point of view but with all the liveliness and literary excellence of the Philosophe movement at its best. Another physiological work of great merit at this period was the Traite de la vie et de la mort of See also:Bichat, and the example set by these works was widely followed; while in other branches of science Laplace, See also:Lagrange,Haiiy,Berthollet, &c., produced contributions of the highest value. From the literary point of view, however, the chief interest of this time is centred in two individual names, those of Chateaubriand and Madame de Stael, and in three literary developments of a more or less novel character, which were all of the highest importance in shaping the course which French literature has taken since 1824. One of these developments was the reactionary movement of Maistre and Bonald, which in its turn largely influenced Chateaubriand, then See also:Lamennais and See also:Montalembert, and was later represented in French literature in different guises, chiefly by Louis See also:Veuillot (1815—1883) and Mgr See also:Dupanloup(18oa—1878). The second and third, closely connected, were the immense advances made by parliamentary eloquence and by political writing, the latter of which, by the hand of Paul Louis Courier (1773-1825) ,contributed for the first time an undoubted master-piece to French literature. The influence of the two combined 'has since raised journalism to even a greater See also:pitch of power in France than in any other country. It is in the development of these new openings for literature, and in the cast and complexion which they gave to its matter, that the real literary importance of the Revolutionary period consists; just as it is in the new elements which they supplied for the treatment of such subjects that the literary value of the authors of Rene and De l'Allemagne mainly lies. We have already alluded to some of the beginnings of periodical and journalistic letters in France. For some time, in the hands of Bayle, See also:Basnage, Des Maizeaux, See also:Jurieu, Leclerc, periodical literature consisted mainly of a series, more or less disconnected, of pamphlets, with occasional extracts from forthcoming works, critical adversaria and the like. Of a more regular kind were the often-mentioned Journal de Trevoux and Mercure de France, and later the Annee litteraire of Freron and the like. The Correspondance of Grimm also, as we have pointed out, bore considerable resemblance to a modern monthly See also:review, though it was addressed to a very few persons. Of political news there was, under a despotism, naturally very little. 1789, however, saw a vast change in this respect. An enormous efflorescence of periodical literature at once took place, and a few of the numerous See also:journals founded in that year or soon after-wards survived for a considerable time. A whole class of authors arose who pretended to be nothing more than journalists, while many writers distinguished for more solid contributions to literature took part in the movement, and not a few active politicians contributed. Thus to the original See also:staff of the Monileur, or, as it was at first called, La Gazette Nationale, La Harpe, See also:Lacretelle, Andrieux, Dominique Joseph See also:Garat (1749—1833) and Pierre Ginguene (1748—1826) were attached. Among the writers of the Journal de Paris Andre Chenier had been ranked. Fontanes contributed to many royalist and moderate journals. See also:Guizot and Morellet, representatives respectively of the 19th and the 18th century, shared in the Nouvelles politiques, while Bertin, Fievee and J. L. See also:Geoffroy (1743—1814), a critic of peculiar acerbity, contributed to the Journal de l'empire, afterwards turned into the still existing Journal des debats. With Geoffroy, Francois Benoit Hoffman (1760-1828), jean F. J. Dussault (1769—1824) and Charles F. Dorimond, abbe de Feletz (1765 185o), constituted a quartet of critics sometimes spoken of as " the Debats four," though they were by no means all friends. Of active politicians See also:Marat(L' Ami du peuple), See also:Mirabeau(Courrier de See also:Provence), Barere (Journal des debats et des decrets), See also:Brissot (Patriote See also:francais), See also:Hebert (Pere See also:Duchesne), See also:Robespierre (Defen-seur de la constitution), and See also:Tallien (La Sentinelle) were the most remarkable who had an intimate connexion with journalism. On the other hand, the type of the journalist pure and simple is Camille See also:Desmoulins(1759—1794), one of the most brilliant, in a literary point of view, of the short-lived celebrities of the time. Of the same class were Pelletier, Durozoir, Loustalot, Royou. As the immediate daily interest in politics drooped, there were formed See also:periodicals of a partly political and partly literary character. Such had been the decade philosophique, which counted Cabanis,Chenier, and De Tracy among its contributors, and this was followed by the Revue francaise at a later period, which was in its turn succeeded by the Revue des deux mondes. On the other hand, parliamentary eloquence was even more important than journalism during the early period of the Revolution, Mirabeau naturally stands at the head of orators of this class, and next to him may be ranked the well-known names of See also:Malouet and See also:Meunier among constitutionalists; of Robespierre, Marat and Danton, the triumvirs of the See also:Mountain; of See also:Maury, See also:Cazales and the vicomte de Mirabeau, among the royalists; and above all of the Girondist speakers See also:Barnave, See also:Vergniaud, and See also:Lanjuinais. The last named survived to take part in the revival of parliamentary discussion after the Restoration. But the permanent contributions to French literature of this period of voluminous eloquence are, as frequently happens in such cases, by no means large. The union of the journalist and the parliamentary spirit produced, however, in Paul Louis Courier a master of style. Courier spent the greater part of courier. his life, tragically cut short, in translating the classics and studying the older writers of France, in which study he learnt thoroughly to despise the pseudo-classicism of the 18th century. It was not till he was past forty that he took to political writing, and the style of his pamphlets, and their wonderful irony and vigour, at once placed them on the level of the very best things of the kind. Along with Courier should be mentioned See also:Benjamin Constant (1767—1830), who, though partly a romance writer and partly a philosophical author, was mainly a politician and an orator, besides being fertile in articles and pamphlets. Lamennais, like Lamartine, will best be dealt with later, and the same may be said of Beranger; but Chateaubriand and Madame de Stael must be noticed here. The former represents, in the influence which changed the literature of the 18th century into the literature of the 19th, the vague spirit of unrest and " Weltschmerz," the affection for the picturesque qualities of nature, the religious spirit occasionally turning into mysticism, and the respect, sure to become more and more definite and appreciative, for antiquity. He gives in short the romantic and conservative element. Madame de Stael (1766—1817) on the other hand, as became a daughter of Necker, retained a de MadamStaet. e great deal of the Philosophe character and the traditions of the 18th century, especially its liberalism, its sensibilite, and its thirst for general information; to which, however, she added a See also:cosmopolitan spirit, and a readiness to introduce into France the literary and social, as well as the political and philosophical, peculiarities of other countries to which the 18th century, in France at least,had been a stranger, and which Chateaubriand himself, notwithstanding his excursions into English literature, had been very far from feeling. She therefore contributed to the positive and liberal side of the future movement. The absolute literary importance of the two was very different. Madame de Stael's early writings were of the critical kind, half aesthetic half ethical, of which the 18th century had been fond, and which their titles, Lettres sur J.J. Rousseau, De 1' influence des passions, De la liteerature consideree Bans ses See also:rap ports aver les institutions sociales, sufficiently show. Her romances, Delphine and Corinne, had immense literary influence at the time. Still more was this the case with De l'Allemagne; which practically opened up to the rising generationin France the till then unknown treasures of literature and philosophy, which during the most glorious half century of her literary history ri b,iaua id.u- Germany had, sometimes on hints taken from France herself, been accumulating. The literary importance of Chateaubriand (1768—1848) is far greater, while his literary influence can hardly be exaggerated. Chateaubriand's literary father was Rousseau, and his voyage to See also:America helped to develop the seeds which Rousseau had sown. In Rene and other works of the same kind, the See also:naturalism of Rousseau received a still further development. But it was not in mere naturalism that Chateaubriand was to find his most fertile and most successful theme. It was, on the contrary, in the rehabilitation of Christianity as an inspiring force in literature. The '8th century had used against religion the method of ridicule; Chateaubriand, by genius rather than by reasoning, set up against this method that of poetry and romance. " Christianity," says he, almost in so many words, " is the most poetical of all religions, the most attractive, the most fertile in literary, artistic and social results." This theme he develops with the most splendid language, and with every conceivable advantage of style, in the Genie du Christianistne and the Martyrs. The splendour of imagination, the summonings of history and literature to supply effective and touching illustrations, analogies and incidents, the rich colouring so different from the peculiarly monotonous and See also:grey tones of the masters of the '8th century, and the fervid admiration for nature which were Chateaubriand's main attractions and characteristics, could not fail to have an enormous literary influence. Indeed he has been acclaimed, with more reason than is usually found in such acclamations, as the founder of comparative and imaginative literary criticism in France if not in Europe. The Romantic school acknowledged, and with justice, its direct indebtedness to him. Literature since 1830.–In dealing with the last period of the history of French literature and that which was introduced by the literary revolution of 183o and has continued, in phases of only partial change, to the present day, a slight alteration of treatment is requisite. The subdivisions of literature have lately become so numerous, and the contributions to each have reached such an immense volume, that it is impossible to give more than cursory notice, or indeed allusion, to most of them. It so happens, however, that the purely literary characteristics of this period, though of the most striking and remarkable, are confined to a few branches of literature. The character of the '9th century in France has hitherto been at least as strongly marked as that of any previous period. In the middle ages men of letters followed each other in the cultivation of certain literary forms for long centuries. The chanson de geste, the Arthurian legend, the roman d' aventure, the fabliau, the allegorical poem, the rough dramatic See also:feu, mystery and farce, served successively as moulds into which the thought and writing impulse of generations of authors were successively cast, often with little attention to the suitability of form and subject. The end of the '5th century, and still more the '6th, owing to the vast See also:extension of thought and knowledge then introduced, finally broke up the old forms, and introduced the practice of treating each subject in a manner more or less appropriate to it, and whether appropriate or not, freely selected by the author. At the same time a vast but somewhat indiscriminate addition was made to the actual vocabulary of the language. The' 7th and 18th centuries witnessed a process of restriction once more to certain forms and strict imitation of predecessors, combined with attention to purely arbitrary rules, the cramping and impoverishing effect of this (in Fenelon's words) being counterbalanced partly by the efforts of individual genius, and still more by the constant and steady enlargement of the range of thought, the choice of subjects, and the familiarity with other literature, both of the ancient and modern world. The literary work of the '9th century and of the great Romantic movement which began in its second quarter was to repeat on a far larger scale the work of the 16th, to break up and discard such literary forms as had become useless or hopelessly stiff, to give strength, suppleness and variety to such as were retained, to invent new ones where necessary, to enrich the language by importations, inventions and revivals,and, above all, to bring into prominence the principle of See also:individualism. Authors and even books, rather than groups and kinds, demand principal attention. The result of this revolution is naturally most remarkable inthe belles-lettres and the kindred department of history. Poetry, not dramatic, has been revived; prose romance and literary criticism have been brought to a perfection previously unknown; and history has produced works more various, if not more remark-able, than at any previous stage of the language. Of all these branches we shall therefore endeavour to give some detailed account. But the services done to the language were not limited to the strictly literary branches of literature. Modern French, if it lacks, as it probably does lack, the statuesque precision and elegance of prose style to which between 1650 and'800 all else was sacrificed, has become a much more suitable instrument for the accurate and copious treatment of positive and See also:concrete subjects. These subjects have accordingly been treated in an abundance corresponding to that manifested in other countries, though the literary importance of the treatment has perhaps proportionately declined. We cannot even attempt to indicate the innumerable directions of scientific study which this copious industry has taken, and must confine oi'rselves to those which come more immediately under the headings previously adopted. In philosophy proper France, like other nations, has been more remarkable for attention to the historical side of the matter than for the production of new systems; and the principal exception among her philosophical writers, Auguste Comte(' 993–1857), besides inclining, as far as his matter went to the political and scientific rather than to the purely philosophical side (which indeed he regarded as antiquated), was not very remarkable merely as 'a man of letters. Victor See also:Cousin (1792–1867), on the other hand, almost a brilliant man of letters and for a time regarded as something of a philosophical apostle See also:preaching " See also:eclecticism," betook himself latterly to See also:biographical and other miscellaneous writing, especially on the famous French ladies of the 17th century, and is likely to be remembered chiefly in this department, though not to be forgotten in that of philosophical history and criticism. The same curious declension was observable in the much younger Hippolyte Adolphe See also:Taine (1828–1893), who, beginning with philosophical studies, and always maintaining a strong tincture of philosophical See also:determinism, applied himself later, first to literary history and criticism in his famous Histoire de la litterature anglaise (1864), and then to history proper in his still more famous and far more solidly based Origines de la France contemporaine (1876). To him, however, we must recur under the head of literary criticism. And not dissimilar phenomena, not so much of inconstancy to philosophy as of a tendency towards the applied rather than the pure branches of the subject, are noticeable in See also:Edgar See also:Quinet (1803–1875), in Charles de See also:Remusat (1797–1875), and in Ernest See also:Renan (1823–'892), the first of whom began by translating See also:Herder while the second and third devoted themselves early to scholastic philosophy, de Remusat dealing with See also:Abelard (1845) and See also:Anselm (1856), Renan with See also:Averroes (1852). More single-minded devotion to at least the historical side was shown by Jean Philibert See also:Damiron (1794–1862), who published in '842 a Gouts de philosophic and many minor works at different times; but the inconstancy recurs in Jules Simon (18'4–'896), who, in the earlier part of his life a professor of philosophy and a writer of authority on the Greek philosophers (especially in Histoire de l' ecole d' Alexandrie, 1844–1845), began before long to take an active and, towards the close of his life-work, all but a foremost part in politics. In theology the chief name of great literary eminence in the earlier part of the century is that of Lamennais, of whom more presently, in the later, that of Renan again. But Charles See also:Forbes de Montalembert (1810–1870), an historian with a strong theological tendency, deserves notice; and among ecclesiastics who have been orators and writers the pere Jean Baptiste Henri See also:Lacordaire (1802–1861), a See also:pupil of Lamennais who returned to orthodoxy but always kept to the Liberal side; the pere Celestin Joseph See also:Felix (1810–1891), a Jesuit teacher and preacher of eminence; and the pere Didon (1840–1900), a very popular preacher and writer who, though thoroughly orthodox, did not escape collision with his superiors. On the Protestant side Athanase See also:Coquerel (1820–1875) is the most remarkable name. Recently Paul See also:Sabatier (b. '858) has displayed, especially in dealing with Saint Francis of See also:Assisi, much power of literary and religious sympathy and a style somewhat modelled on that of Renan, but less unctuous and effeminate. There are strong philosophical tendencies, and at least a revolt against the religious as well as philosophical ideas of the Encyclopedists, in the Pensees of Joubert, while the hybrid position characteristic of the 19th century is particularly noticeable in Etienne Pivert de See also:Senancour (1770-1846), whose principal work, Obermann (1804), had an extraordinary influence on its own and the next generation in the direction of See also:melancholy moralizing. This tone was notably taken up towards the other end of the century by See also:Amiel (q.v.), who, however, does not strictly belong to French literature: while in Ximenes Doudon (1800-1872), author of Melanges et lettres posthumously published, we find more of a return to the attitude of Joubert—literary criticism occupying a very large part of his reflections. Political philosophy and its kindred sciences have naturally received a large share of attention. Towards the middle of the century there was a great development of socialist and fanciful theorizing on politics, with which the names of Claude Henri, comte de Saint-Simon (1760-1825), Charles See also:Fourier (1772-1837), Etienne See also:Cabet (1788-1856), and others are connected. As political economists Frederic See also:Bastiat (1801-1850), L. G. L. Guilhaud de Lavergne (1809-1880), Louis Auguste See also:Blanqui (1805-1881), and Michel Chevalier (1806-1879) may be noticed. In Alexis de See also:Tocqueville (1805-1859) France produced a political observer of a remarkably acute, moderate and reflective character, and Armand See also:Carrel (1800-1836), whose life was cut short in a See also:duel, was a real man of letters, as well as a brilliant journalist and an honest if rather violent party politician. The name of Jean Louis Eugene Lerminier (1803-1857) is of wide repute for legal and constitutional writings, and that of Henri, baron de See also:Jomini (1779-1869) is still more celebrated as a military historian; while that of Francois See also:Lenormant (1837-1883) holds a not dissimilar position in archaeology. With the publications devoted to physical science proper we do not attempt to meddle. See also:Philology, however, demands a brief notice. In classical studies France has till recently hardly maintained the position which might be expected of the country of Scaliger and Casaubon. She has, however, produced some considerable Orientalists, such as See also:Champollion the younger, See also:Burnouf, See also:Silvestre de Sacy and Stanislas Julien. The See also:foundation of Romance philology was due, indeed, to the foreigners Wolf and See also:Diez. But early in the century the curiosity as to the older literature of France created by Barbazan, Tressan and others continued to extend. Dominique Martin Won (1748-1829) published many unprinted fabliaux, gave the whole of the French Renart cycle, with the exception of Renart le conirefait, and edited the Roman de la rose. Charles Claude See also:Fauriel (1772-1844) and Francois Raynouard (1761-1836) dealt elaborately with Provencal poetry as well as partially with that of the trouveres; and the latter produced his comprehensive Lexique romane. These examples were followed by many other writers, who edited manuscript works and commented on them, always with zeal and sometimes with discretion. Foremost among these must be mentioned Paulin Paris (1800-1881) who for fifty years served the cause of old French literature with untiring energy, great literary taste, and a pleasant and facile pen. His selections from manuscripts, his Romancero francais, his editions of Garin le Loherain and Berle aus grans pies, and his Romans de la table sonde may especially be mentioned. Soon, too, the See also:Benedictine Histoire litteraire, so long interrupted, was resumed under M. Paris's general management, and has proceeded nearly to the end of the 14th century. Among its contents M. Paris's dissertations on the later chansons de gestes and the early song writers, M. Victor le Clerc's on the fabliaux, and M. See also:Littre's on the romans d'aventures may be specially noticed. For some time indeed the work of French editors was chargeable with a certain lack of critical and philological accuracy. This reproach, however, was wiped off by the efforts of a band of younger scholars, chiefly pupils of the Ecole des Chartes, with MM.Gaston Paris (1839-1903) and Paul See also:Meyer at their head. Of M. Paris in particular it may be said that no scholar in the subject has ever combined literary and linguistic competence more admirably. The Societe desAnciensTextesFrancais was formed for the purpose of See also:publishing scholarly editions of inedited works, and a lexicon of the older tongue by M. See also:Godefroy at last supplemented, though not quite with equal accomplishment, the admirable dictionary in which Emile Littre (18or-1881), at the cost of a life's labour, embodied the whole vocabulary of the classical French language. Meanwhile the period between the middle ages proper and the 17th century has not lacked its share of this revival of attention. To the literature between Villon and Regnier especial attention was paid by the early Romantics, and Sainte-Beuve's Tableau historique et critique de la poesie el du theatre au seizieme siecle was one of the manifestoes of the school. Since the appearance of that work in 1828 editions with critical comments of the literature of this period have constantly multiplied, aided by the great fancy for tastefully produced works which exists among the richer classes in France; and there are probably now few countries in which works of old authors, whether in cheap reprints or in editions de luxe can be more readily procured. The Romantic Movement.—It is time, however, to return to the literary revolution itself, and its more purely literary results. At the accession of Charles X. France possessed three Manlier. writers, and perhaps only three, of already remarkable eminence, if we except Chateaubriand, who was already of a past generation. These three were Pierre Jean de Beranger (178o-1857), See also:Alphonse de Lamartine (179o-1869), and Hugues Felicite Robert Lamennais (1782-185.4). The first belongs definitely in manner, despite his striking originality of nuance, to the past. He has remnants of the old periphrases, the cumbrous mythological allusions, the poetical " properties " of French verse. He has also the older and somewhat narrow limitations of a French poet; foreigners are for him mere barbarians. At the same time his extraordinary lyrical faculty, his excellent wit, which makes him a descendant of Rabelais and La Fontaine, and his occasional touches of pathos made him deserve and obtain something more than successes of occasion. Beranger, moreover, was very far from being the mere See also:improvisatore which those who cling to the inspirationist theory of poetry would See also:fain see in him. His studies in style and composition were persistent, and it was long before he attained the See also:firm and brilliant manner which distinguishes him. Beranger's talent, however, was still too much a matter of individual genius to have great literary influence, and he formed no school. It was different with Lamartine, who was, nevertheless, like Beranger, a typical Frenchman. The Meditations and the tine. Lamar• Harmonies exhibit a remarkable transition between the old school and the new. In going direct to nature, in borrowing from her striking outlines, vivid and contrasted tints, See also:harmony and variety of sound, the new poet showed himself an innovator of the best class. In using romantic and religious associations, and expressing them in affecting language, he was the Chateaubriand of verse. But with all,this he retained some of the vices of the classical school. His versification, harmonious as it is, is monotonous, and he does not venture into the bold lyrical forms which true poetry loves. He has still the horror of the mot propre; he is always spiritualizing and idealizing, and his style and thought have a double portion of the feminine and almost flaccid softness which had come to pass for grace in French. The last of the trio, Lamennais, represents an altogether bolder and rougher genius. Strongly influenced by the Catholic reaction, Lamennais also shows the strongest possible influence of the revolutionary spirit. His earliest work, the Essai sur l'indifference en maliere de religion (1817 and 1818) was a defence of the church on curiously unecclesiastical lines. It was written in an ardent style, full of illustrations, and extremely ambitious in character. The plan was partly critical and partly constructive. The first part disposed of the 18th century; the second, adopting the theory of papal See also:absolutism which Joseph de Maistre had already advocated, proceeded to See also:base it on a supposed universal consent. The after history of Lamennais was perhaps not an unnatural recoil from this; but it is sufficient here to point out that in his prose, Laanenvats. especially as afterwards developed in the apocalyptic Paroles d'un croyant (1839) are to be discerned many of the tendencies of the Romantic school, particularly its hardy and picturesque choice of language, and the disdain of established and accepted methods which it professed. The signs of the revolution itself were, as was natural, first given in periodical literature. The feudalist affectations of Chateaubriand and the See also:legitimists excited a sort of aesthetic affection for Gothicism, and Walter See also:Scott became one of the most favourite authors in France. Soon was started the periodical La Muse francaise, in which the names of Hugo, See also:Vigny, Deschamps and Madame de See also:Girardin appear. Almost all the writers in this periodical were eager royalists, and for some time the battle was still fought on political grounds. There could, however, be no special connexion between classical drama and liberalism; and the liberal journal, the Globe, with no less a person than Sainte-Beuve among its contributors, declared definite war against classicism in the drama. The chief " classical " See also:organs were the Constitutionnel, the Journal des debats, and after a time and not exclusively, the Revue des deux mondes. Soon the question became purely literary, and the Romantic school proper was born in the famous cenacle or clique in which Hugo was chief poet, Sainte-Beuve chief critic, and Gautier, Gerard de See also:Nerval, the brothers Emile (1791-1871) and Antony (1800-1869), Deschamps, Petrus See also:Borel (18o9-1859) and. others were See also:officers. See also:Alfred de Vigny and Alfred de See also:Musset stand somewhat apart, and so does Charles See also:Nodier (r 78o-1844), a versatile and voluminous writer, the very variety and number of whose works have somewhat prevented the individual excellence of any of them from having justice done to it. The objects of the school, which was at first violently opposed, so much so that certain academicians actually petitioned the king to forbid the admission of any Romantic piece at the Theatre Francais, were, briefly stated, the burning of everything which had been adored, and the adoring of everything which had been burnt. They would have no unities, no arbitrary selection of subjects, no restraints on variety of versification, no academically limited vocabulary, no considerations of artificial beauty, and, above all, no periphrastic expression. The mot pro pre, the calling of a See also:spade a spade, was the great commandment of Romanticism; but it must be allowed that what was taken away in periphrase was made up in adjectives. Musset, who was very much of a free-See also:lance in the contest, maintained indeed that the differentia of the Romantic was the copious use of this part of speech. All sorts of epithets were invented to distinguish the two parties, of which flamboyant and grisdtre are perhaps the most accurate and expressive pair—the former serving to denote the gorgeous tints and bold,attempts of the new school, the latter the grey colour and monotonous outlines of the old. The See also:representation of Hernani in 1830 was the See also:culmination of the struggle, and during great part of the reign of Louis Philippe almost all the younger men of letters in France were Romantics. The representation of the Lucrece of Francois See also:Ponsard (1814-1867) in 1846 is often quoted as the See also:herald or sign of a classical reaction. But this was only apparent, and signified, if it signified anything, merely that the more juvenile excesses of the Romantics were out of date. All the greatest men of letters of France since 183o have been on the innovating side, and all without exception, whether intentionally or not, have had their work coloured by the results of the movement, and of those which have succeeded it as developments rather than reactions. Drama and Poetry since z83o.-Although the immediate subject on which the battles of Classics and Romantics arose was dramatic poetry, the dramatic results of the movement have not been those of greatest value or most permanent character. The principal effect in the long run has been the introduction of a See also:species of play called drame, as opposed to regular comedy and tragedy, admitting of much freer treatment than either of these two as previously understood in French, and lending itself in some measure to the lengthy and disjointed action, the multiplicity of personages, and the absence of stock characters which characterized the English stage in its palmy days. All Victor Hugo's dramatic works are of this class, andeach, as it was produced or published (Cromwell, Hernani, Marion de i'See also:Orme, Le Roi s'amuse, Lucrece See also:Borgia, Marie Tudor, Ruy Bias and Les Burgraves), was a literary event, and excited the most violent discussion—the author's usual plan being to prefix a prose preface of a very militant character to his work. A still more melodramatic variety of drame was that chiefly represented by Alexandre See also:Dumas (18oz-187o), whose Henri III and Antony, to which may be added later La Tour de See also:Nesle and Mademoiselle de Belleisle, were almost as much rallying points for the early Romantics as the dramas of Hugo, despite their inferior literary value. At the same time Alexandre See also:Soumet (1788-1845), in Norma, Une Fete de Neron, &c., and Casimir Delavigne in See also:Marino See also:Faliero, Louis XI, &c., maintained a somewhat closer adherence to the older models. The classical or semi-classical reaction of the last years of Louis Philippe was represented in tragedy by Ponsard (Lucrece, See also:Agnes de Meranie, See also:Charlotte See also:Corday, Ulysse, and several comedies), and on the comic side, to a certain extent, by Emile See also:Augier (18zo-1889) in L'Aventuriere, Le Gendre de M. Poirier, Le Fils de Giboyer, &c. During almost the whole period Eugene See also:Scribe (1791-1861) poured forth innumerable comedies of the See also:vaudeville order, which, without possessing much literary value, attained immense popularity. For the last half-century the realist development of Romanticism has had the upper hand in dramatic composition, its principal representatives being on the one side Victorien See also:Sardou (1831-19o9), who in Nos Intimes, La Famille Beno£ton, Rabagas, Dora, &c., chiefly devoted himself to the satirical treatment of manners, and Alexandre Dumas fils (1824-1895), author in 1852 of the famous See also:Dame aux camelias, who in such pieces as Les Idees de Madame Aubray and L'Etrangere rather busied himself with morals and " problems," while his Dame aux camelias (1852) is sometimes ranked as the first of such things in " modern " style. Certain isolated authors also deserve notice, such as Joseph See also:Autran (1813-1877), a poet and academician having some resemblance to Lamartine, whose Fille d'lEschyle created for him a dramatic reputation which he did not attempt to follow up, and Gabriel See also:Legouve (b. 1807), whose Adrienne See also:Lecouvreur was assisted to popularity by the admirable talent of See also:Rachel. A special variety of drama of the first literary importance has also been cultivated in this century under the title of scenes or proverbes, slight dramatic sketches in which the dialogue and. style are of even more importance than the action. The best of all of these are those of Alfred de Musset (1810-1857), whose Il faut qu'une See also:porte soit ouverte ou feriae, On ne badine pas avec l'amour, &c., are models of grace and wit. Among his followers may be mentioned especially See also:Octave See also:Feuillet (182r-189o). Few social dramas of the kind in modern times have attained a greater success than Le Monde oh l'on s'ennuie (1868) of fdouard See also:Pailleron (1834-1899). (See also DRAMA.) In poetry proper, as in drama, Victor Hugo showed the way. In him all the Romantic characteristics were expressed and embodied—disregard of arbitrary critical rules, free vktor choice of subject, variety and vigour of metre, splendour Hoge. and sonorousness of diction, abundant " See also:local colour," and that irrepressible individualism which is one of the chief, though not perhaps the chief, of the symptoms. If the careful attention to form which is also characteristic of the movement is less apparent in him than in some of his followers, it is not because it is absent, but because the enthusiastic conviction with which he attacked every subject somewhat diverts attention from it. As with the merits so with the defects. A deficient sense of the ludicrous which characterized many of the Romantics was strongly apparent in their leader, as was also an equally representative grandiosity, and a fondness for the introduction of foreign and unfamiliar words, especially proper names, which occasionally produces an effect of burlesque. Victor Hugo's earliest poetical works, his chiefly royalist and political Odes, were cast in the older and accepted forms, but already displayed astonishing poetical qualities. But it was in the Ballades (for instance, the splendid Pas d'armes du roi Jean, written in verses of three syllables) and the Orientales ( of which may be taken for a See also:sample the See also:sixth section of Navarin, a perfect torrent of outlandish terms poured forth in the most admirable verse, or Les Djinns, where some of the stanzas have lines of two syllables each) that the grand provocation was thrown to the believers in alexandrines, careful caesuras and strictly separated couplets. Les Feuilles d'automne, Les Chants du crepuscule, Les Voix interieures, Les Rayons et les ombres, the productions of the next twenty years, were quieter in style and tone, but no less full of poetical spirit. The Revolution of 1848, the See also:establishment of the empire and the poet's exile brought about a fresh determination of his genius to lyrical subjects. Les Ch4timents and La Legende des siecles, the one political, the other historical, reach perhaps the high-See also:water mark of French verse; and they were followed by the philosophical Contemplations, the lighter Chansons des rues et des bois, the Annee terrible, the second Legende des siecles, and the later work to be found noticed sub nom. We have been thus particular here because the literary productiveness of Victor Hugo himself has been the measure and sample of the whole literary productiveness of France on the poetical side. At five-and-twenty he was acknowledged as a master, at seventy-five he was a master still. His poetical influence has been represented in three different schools, from which very few of the poetical writers of the century can be excluded. These few we may notice first. Alfred Musset de Musset, a writer of great genius, felt part of the Romantic inspiration very strongly, but was on the whole unfortunately influenced by See also:Byron, and partly out of wilfulness, partly from a natural want of persevering industry and vigour, allowed himself to be careless and even slovenly in composition. Notwithstanding this, many of his lyrics are among the finest poems in the language, and his verse, careless as it is, has extraordinary natural grace. Auguste Barbier (1805-1882) whose Jambes shows an extraordinary command of nervous and masculine versification, also comes in here; and the Breton poet, Auguste See also:Brizeux (1803-1858), much admired by some, together with Hegesippe Moreau, an unequal writer possessing some talent, Pierre See also:Dupont (1821-1870), one of much greater gifts, and Gustave Nadaud (1820-1893), a follower of Beranger, also deserve mention. Of the school of Lamartine rather than of Hugo are Alfred de Vigny (1799-1865) and Victor de See also:Laprade (1812-1887), the former a writer of little bulk and somewhat over-fastidious, but possessing one of the most correct and elegant styles to be found in French, with a curious restrained passion and a complicated originality, the latter a meditative and philosophical poet, like Vigny an admirable writer, but somewhat deficient in See also:pith and substance, as well as in warmth and colour. Madame See also:Ackermann (1813-1890) is the chief philosophical poetess of France, and this style has recently been very popular; but for actual poetical powers, Marceline Desbordes-Valmore (1786-1859) perhaps excelled her, though in a looser and more sentimental fashion. The poetical schools which more directly derive from the Romantic movement as represented by Hugo are three in number, corresponding in point of time with the first outburst of the movement, with the period of reaction already alluded to, and with the closing years of the second empire. Of the first by far the most distinguished member was Theophile Gautier (1811-1872), the most perfect Gautier poet in point of form that France has produced. When quite a boy he devoted himself to the study of 16th-century masters, and though he acknowledged the supremacy of Hugo, his own talent was of an individual order, and developed itself more or less independently. Albertus alone of his poems has much of the extravagant and See also:grotesque character which distinguished early romantic literature. The Comedie de la moll, the Poesies diverses, and still more the Emaux et camas, display a distinctly classical tendency—classical, that is to say, not in the party and perverted sense, but in its true acceptation. The tendency to the fantastic and horrible may be taken as best shown by Petrus Borel (1809-1859), a writer of singular power almost entirely wasted. Gerard Labrunie or de Nerval (18o8-1855) adopted a manner also fantastic but more idealistic than Borel's, and distinguished himself by his Oriental travels and studies, and by his attention to popular ballads and traditions,while his style has an exquisite but unaffected strangeness hardly inferior to Gautier's. This peculiar and somewhat quintessenced style is also remarkable in the Gaspard de la nuit of Louis See also:Bertrand (1807-1841), a work of rhythmical prose almost unique in its character. One famous sonnet preserves the name of Felix Arvers (1806-1850). The two Deschamps were chiefly remarkable as translators. The next generation produced three remarkable poets, to whom may perhaps be added a fourth. Theodore de See also:Banville (1823-1891), adopting the principles of Gautier, and combining with them a considerable satiric faculty, composed a large amount of verse, faultless in form, delicate and exquisite in shades and See also:colours, but so entirely neutral in moral and political tone that it has found fewer admirers than it deserved. Charles Marie Rene Leconte de Lisle (1818-1894), carrying out the principle of ransacking foreign literature for subjects, went to Celtic, classical or even Oriental sources for his inspiration, and despite a science in verse not much inferior to Banville's, and a far wider range and choice of subject, diffused an air of erudition, not to say pedantry, over his work which disgusted some readers, and a See also:pessimism which displeased others, but has left poetry only inferior to that of the greatest of his countrymen. Charles See also:Baudelaire (182 r-1867);, by his choice of unpopular subjects and the terrible truth of his analysis, revolted not a few of those who, in the words of an English critic, cannot take pleasure in the representation if they do not take pleasure in the thing represented, and who thus See also:miss his extraordinary command of the poetical See also:appeal in sound, in imagery and in See also:suggestion generally. Thus, by a strange coincidence, each of the three representatives of the second Romantic generation was for a time disappointed of his due fame. A fourth poet of this time, Josephin See also:Soulary (1815-1891), produced sonnets of rare beauty and excellence. A fifth, Louis See also:Bouilhet (1822-1869), an intimate friend of See also:Flaubert, pushed even farther the fancy for strange subjects, but showed powers in Melcenis and other things. In 1866 a collection of poems, entitled after an old French fashion Le Parnasse contemporain, appeared. It included contributions by many of the poets just mentioned, but the mass of the contributors were hitherto unknown to fame. A similar collection appeared in 1869, and was interrupted by the German war, but continued after it, and a third in 1876. The first Parnasse had been projected by MM. Xavier de Ricard (b. 1843) and CatulleMendes (1841-1909) as a sort of, manifesto of a school of young poets: but its contents were largely, coloured by the inclusion among them of work by representatives of older generations—Gautier, Laprade, Leconte de Lisle, Banville, Baudelaire and others. The continuation, however, of the title in the later issues, rather than anything else, led to the formation and promulgation of the idea of a " Parnassieri ". or an "Impassible" school which was supposed to adopt as its watchword the motto of " Art for Art's sake," to pay especial attention to form, and also to aim at a certain objectivity. As a matter of fact the greater poets and the greater poems of the Parnasse admit of no such restrictive labelling, which can only be regarded as mischievous, though (or very mainly because) it has been continued. Another school, arising mainly in the later 'eighties and calling itself that of " Symbolism," has been supposed to indicate a reaction against Parnassianism and even against the main or Hugonic Romantic tradition generally ; with a throwing back to Lamartine and perhaps Chenier. This idea of successive schools (" Decadents," " Naturists," " Simplists," &c.) has even been reduced to such an absurdum as the statement that " France sees a new school of poetry every fifteen years." Those who have studied literature sufficiently widely, and from a sufficient See also:elevation, know that these systematisings are always more or less delusive. Parnassianism, symbolism and the other things are merely phases of the Romantic movement itself—as may be proved to demonstration by the simple process of taking, say, Hugo and See also:Verlaine on the one hand, Delille or Escouchard Lebrun on the other, and comparing the two first mentioned with each other and with the older poet. The differences in the first case will be found to be differences at most of individuality: in the other of:kind. We shall not, therefore, further refer to these dubious classifications: but specify briefly the most remarkable poets whom they concern, and all the older of whom, it may be observed, were represented in the Parnasse itself. Of these the most remarkable were Sully Prudhomme (1839-1907), Francois See also:Coppee (1842-r9o8) and Paul Verlaine (1844-1896). The first (Stances et poemes, 1865, Vaines Tendresses, 1875, See also:Bonheur, 1888, &c.) is a philosophical and rather pessimistic poet who has very strongly rallied the suffrages of the rather large present public who care for the embodiment of these tendencies in verse; the second (La Greve des forgerons, 1869, Les Humbles, 1872, Contes et vers, 1881-1887, &c.) a dealer with more generally popular subjects in a more sentimental manner; and the third (Sagesse, 1881, Parallelement, 1889, Fames saturniens, including early work, 1867-1890), by far the most original and remarkable poet of the three, starting with Baudelaire and pushing farther the fancy for forbidden subjects, but treating both these and others with wonderful command of sound and See also:image-suggestion. Verlaine in fact (he was actually well acquainted with English) endeavoured, and to a small extent succeeded in the endeavour, to communicate to French the vague suggestion of visual and audible appeal which has characterized English poetry from See also:Blake through See also:Coleridge. Others of the original Parnassiens who deserve mention are See also:Albert See also:Glatigny (1839-1873), a Bohemian poet of great talent who died young; Stephane See also:Mallarme (1842-1898), afterwards chief of the Symbolists, also a true poet in his way, but somewhat barren, and the victim of pose and See also:trick; Jose Maria de See also:Heredia (1842-1905), a very exquisite practitioner of the sonnet but with perhaps more art than matter in him; Henri See also:Cazalis (1840-1909), who long afterwards, under his name of Jean Lahor, appeared as a Symbolist pessimist; A. See also:Villiers de l'Isle-Adam, another eccentric but with a spark of genius; Emmanuel des Essarts; Auguste de Ch$tillon (1810—1882); Leon Dierx (b. 1838) who, after producing even less than Mallarme, succeeded him as Symbolist chief; Jean See also:Aicard (b. 1848), a See also:southern See also:bard of merit; and lastly Catulle Mendes himself, who has been a brilliant writer in verse and prose ever since, and whose Mouvement poetique francais de 1867 d 7900 (1903), an official report largely amplified so that it is in fact a history and dictionary of French poetry during the century, forms an almost unique work of reference on the subject. Among the later recruits the most specially noticeable was Armand Silvestre (1837-1901), whose verse (La Chanson des heures, 1878, Ailes d'or, 1880, La Chanson des etoiles, 1885), of an ethereal beauty, was contrasted with prose admirably written and sometimes most amusing, but " Pantagruelist," and more, in manners and morals. This declension from poetry to prose fiction was also noticeable in Guy de See also:Maupassant, Andre See also:Theuriet, Anatole France and even Alphonse See also:Daudet. Yet another See also:flight of poets may be grouped as those specially representing the last quarter of the century and (whether Parnassian, Symbolist or what not) the latest development of French poetry. Verlaine and Mallarme already mentioned were in a manner the leaders of these. Perhaps something of the influence of See also:Whitman may be detected in the irregular verses of Gustave See also:Kahn (b. 1859), Francis Viele See also:Griffin, actually an See also:American by birth (b. 1864), See also:Stuart See also:Merrill, of like origin, and Paul Fort (b. 1872). But the whole tendency of the period has been to relax the stringency of French See also:prosody. Albert See also:Samain (1859-1900), a musical versifier enough; Jean See also:Moreas (1856-191o) who began with a volume called Les Syrtes in 1884); Laurent Tailhade (b. 1854) and others are more or less Symbolist, and contributed to the Symbolist periodical (one of many such since the beginning of the Romantic movement which would almost require an article to themselves), the Mercure de France. An older man than many of these, M. Jean See also:Richepin (b. 1849), made for a time considerable See also:noise with poetical work of a colour older even than his age, and harking back somewhat to the Jeune-France and " Bousingot " type of early Romanticism—La Chanson des See also:gueux, Les Blasphemes, &c. Other writers of note are M. Paul See also:Deroulede (b. 1846), a violently nationalist poet; M. Maurice See also:Bouchor (b. 1864), who started his serious and respectable work with Les Symboles in 1888; while M. Henri de Regnier, born in the same year, has received very high praise for work from Lendemains in 1886 and other volumes up to Les Jeux rustiques et divins (1897) and Les Medailles d'argile (1900). The truth, however, perhaps is that this extraordinary abundance of verse (for we have not mentioned a quarter of the names which present themselves., or a twentieth part of those who figure in M. Mendes's catalogue for the last half-century) reminds the literary historian somewhat too much of similar phenomena in other times. There is undoubtedly a great See also:diffusion of poetical dexterity, and not perhaps a small one of poetical spirit, but it requires the settling, clarifying and distinguishing effects of time to separate the poet from the minor poet. Still more perhaps must we look to time to decide whether the vers libre as it is called—that is to say, the verse freed from the minute traditions of the elder prosody, admitting See also:hiatus, neglecting to a greater or less extent caesura, and sometimes relying upon mere See also:rhythm to the neglect of strict metre altogether—can hold its ground. It has as yet been practised by no poet at all approaching the first class, except Verlaine, and not by him in its extremer forms. And the whole history of prosody and poetry teaches us that though similar changes often come in as it were unperceived, they scarcely ever take See also:root in the language unless a great poet adopts them. Or rather it should perhaps be said that when they are going to take root in the language a great poet always does adopt them before very long. Prose Fiction since 1830.—Even more remarkable, because more absolutely novel, was the outburst of prose fiction which followed 1830. Madame de Lafayette, Le Sage, Marivaux, Voltaire, the Abbe Prevost, Diderot, J. J. Rousseau, Bernardin de Saint-Pierre and Fievee had all of them produced work excellent in its way, and comprising in a more or less rudimentary condition most varieties of the novel. But none of them had, in the French phrase, made a school, and at no time had prose fiction been composed in any considerable quantities. The immense influence which Walter Scott exercised was perhaps the direct cause of the attention paid to prose fiction; the facility, too, with which all the fancies, tastes and beliefs of the time could be embodied in such work may have had considerable importance. But it is difficult on any theory of cause and effect to account for the appearance in less than ten years of such a group of novelists as Hugo, Gautier, Dumas, See also:Merimee, Balzac, See also:George See also:Sand, Jules See also:Sandeau and Charles de Bernard, names to which might be added others scarcely inferior. There is hardly anything else resembling it in literature, except the great cluster of English dramatists in the beginning of the 17th century, and of English poets at the beginning of the 19th; and it is remarkable that the excellence of the first group was maintained by a fresh generation—Murger, About, Feuillet, Flaubert, Erckmann-Chatrian, See also:Droz, Daudet, See also:Cherbuliez and See also:Gaboriau, forming a company of See also:diadochi not far inferior to their predecessors, and being themselves not unworthily succeeded almost up to the present day. The romance-writing of France during the period has taken two different directions—the first that of the novel of incident, the second that of analysis and character. The first, now mainly deserted, was that which, as was natural when- Scott was the model, was formerly most trodden; the second required the genius of George Sand and of Balzac and the more problematical talent of See also:Beyle to attract students to it. The novels of Victor Hugo are-novels of incident, with a strong infusion of purpose, and considerable but rather ideal character See also:drawing. They are in fact lengthy prose drames rather than romances proper, and they have found no imitators. They display, however, the powers of the master at their fullest. On the other hand, Alexandre Dumas originally corn- Dumas. posed his novels in close imitation of Scott, and they are much less dramatic than narrative in character, so that they lend themselves to almost indefinite continuation, and there is often no particular reason why they should terminate even at the end of the See also:score or so of volumes to which they sometimes actually extend.. Of this purely narrative kind, which hardly even attempts anything but the boldest character drawing, the best of them, such as Les Trois Mousquetaires, Vingt ans apt-es, La Reine Margot, are probably the best specimens extant. Dumas possesses, almost alone among novelists, the See also:secret of writing interminable dialogue without being tedious, and of telling the story by it. Of something the same kind, but of a far lower stamp, are the novels of Eugene See also:Sue (1804–1857). Dumas and Sue were accompanied and followed by a vast crowd of companions, independent or imitative. Alfred de Vigny had already attempted the historical novel in Cinq-See also:Mars. Henri de La Touche (1785–1851) (Fragoletta), an excellent critic who formed George Sand, but a mediocre novelist, may be mentioned: and perhaps also Roger de See also:Beauvoir, whose real name was Eugene Auguste Roger de See also:Bully (18o6–1866) (Le Chronique de Saint Georges), and Frederic Smile (Les Memoires du diable) (1800–1847). Paul Festal (La See also:Fee des greves) (1817–1877) and Amedee See also:Achard (Belle-Rose) (1814–1875) are of the same school, and some of the attempts of Jules See also:Janin (1804–1874), more celebrated as a critic, may also be connected with it. By degrees, however, the taste for the novel of incident, at least of an historical kind, died out till it was revived in another form, and with an admixture of domestic interest, by MM. Erckmann-Chatrian. The last and one of the most splendid instances of the old style was Le Capitaine Fracasse, which Theophile Gautier began early and finished late as a kind of tour de force. The last-named writer in his earlier days had modified the incident novel in many short tales, a kind of writing for which French has always been famous, and in which Gautier's sketches are masterpieces. His only other long novel, Mademoiselle de Maupin, belongs rather to the class of analysis. With Gautier, as a writer whose literary characteristics even excel his purely tale-telling powers, may be classed Prosper Merimee (1803–1870), one of the most exquisite 19th-century masters of the language. Already, however, in 183o the See also:tide was setting strongly in favour of novels of contemporary life and manners. These were of course susceptible of extremely various treatment. For many years Paul de See also:Kock (1793–1871), a writer who did not trouble himself about Classics or Romantics or any such matter, continued the tradition of Marivaux, Crebillon fils, and Pigault Lebrun (1753–1835) in a series of not very moral or polished but lively and amusing sketches of lift, principally of the bourgeois type. Later Charles de Bernard (1804–1850) (Gerfaut) with infinitely greater wit, elegance, propriety and literary skill, did the same thing for the higher classes of French society. But the two great masters of the novel of character and manners as opposed to that of history and incident are Honore de Balzac (1799–1850) and Aurore Dudevant, commonly called George Sand (1804–1876). Their influence affected the entire body of novelists who succeeded them, with very few exceptions. At the head of these exceptions may be placed Jules Sandeau (1811–1883), who, after writing a certain number of novels in a less individual style, at last made for himself a special subject in a certain kind of domestic novel, where the passions set in See also:motion are less boisterous than those usually preferred by the French novelist, and reliance is mainly placed on minute character drawing and shades of colour sober in See also:hue but very carefully adjusted (Catherine, Mademoiselle de Penarvan, Mademoiselle de la Seigliere). In the same class of the more quiet and purely domestic novelists may be placed X. B. See also:Saintine (1798–1865) (Picciola), Madame C. See also:Reybaud (18oz–1871) (Clementine, Le See also:Cadet de Colobrieres), J. T. de Saint-Germain (Pour en epingle, La Feuille de coudrier), Madame See also:Craven (1808–1891) ()Wsit d'une sceur, Fleurange). Henri Beyle (1798–1865), who wrote under the nom de plume of Stendhal and belongs to an older generation than most of these, also stands by himself. His chief book in the line of fiction is La See also:Chartreuse de Partite, an exceedingly powerful novel of the See also:analytical kind, and he also composed a considerable number of critical and miscellaneous works. Of little influence at first (though he had great power over Merimee) and never master of a perfect style, he has exercised ever increasing authority as a master of pessimist analysis. Indeed much of his work was never published till towards the close of the century. Last among the See also:independents must be mentioned Henry Murger (1822-1861), the painter of what is called Bohemian life, that is to say, the struggles, difficulties and amusements of students, youthful artists, and men of letters. In this peculiar style, which may perhaps be regarded as an irregular descendant. of the picaroon romance, Murger has no rival; and he is also, though on no extensive scale, a poet of great pathos. But with these exceptions, the influences of the two writers we have mentioned, sometimes combined, more often separate, may be traced throughout the whole of later novel literature. George Sand began with books strongly tinged with the spirit of revolt against moral and social arrangements, and she sometimes diverged into very curious paths of pseudo-philosophy, such as was popular in the second quarter of the century. At times, too, as in Lucrezia Floriani and some other works, she did not hesitate to draw largely on her own personal adventures and experiences. But latterly she devoted herself rather to sketches of country life and manners, and to novels involving bold if not. very careful sketches of character and more or less dramatic situations. She was one of the most fertile of novelists, continuing to the end of her long life to pour forth fiction at the rate of many volumes a year. Of her different styles may be mentioned as fairly characteristic, Lelia, Lucrezia Floriani, Consuelo, La See also:Mare au diable, La Petite Fadette, Francois le champi, Mademoiselle de la Quintinie. Considering the shorter length of his life the productiveness of Balzac was Ba/See also:sac the almost more astonishing, especially if we consider that ounger. some of his early work was never reprinted, and that he left great stores of fragments and unfinished sketches. He is, moreover, the most remarkable example in literature of untiring work and determination to achieve success despite the greatest discouragements. His early work was worse than unsuccessful, it was positively bad. After more than a score of unsuccessful attempts, Les See also:Chouans at last made its mark, and for twenty years from that time the astonishing productions composing the so-called Comedie humaine were poured forth successively. The sub-titles which Balzac imposed upon the different batches, Scenes de la vie parisienne, de la vie de See also:province, de la vie intime, &c., show, like the general title, a deliberate intention on the author's part to cover the whole ground of human, at least of French life. Such an attempt could not succeed wholly; yet the amount of success attained is astonishing. Balzac has, however, with some justice been accused of creating the world which he described, and his personages, wonderful as is the accuracy and force with which many of the characteristics of humanity are exemplified in them, are somehow not altogether human. Since these two great novelists, many others have arisen, partly to tread in their steps, partly to strike out independent paths. Octave Feuillet (1821–189o), beginning his career by See also:apprenticeship to Alexandre Dumas and the historical novel, soon found his way in a very different style of composition, the roman intime of fashionable life, in which, notwithstanding some grave defects, he attained much popularity and showed remarkable skill in keeping abreast of his time. The so-called realist side of Balzac was developed (but, as he himself acknowledged, with a double dose of intermixed if somewhat trans-formed Romanticism) by Gustave Flaubert (1821–1880), who showed culture, scholarship and a literary power over the language inferior to that of no writer of the century. No novelist of his generation has attained a higher literary rank than Flaubert. Madame Bovary and L'Education sentimentale are studies of con-temporary life; in Salammb8 and La Tentation de Saint Antoine erudition and antiquarian knowledge furnish the subjects for the display of the highest literary skill. Of about the same date Edmond About (1828–1885), before he abandoned novel-writing, devoted himself chiefly to sketches of abundant but not always refined wit (L'Homme a l'oreille cassee, Le Nez d'un notaire), and sometimes to foreign scenes (Tolla, Le Roi des montagnes). Champfleury (Henri Husson, 1829–1889), a prolific critic, deserves notice for stories of the extravaganza kind. Additional information and CommentsThere are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click, and select "copy." Then paste it into your website, email, or other HTML. Site content, images, and layout Copyright © 2006 - Net Industries, worldwide. |
|
[back] FRENCH LAW AND |
[next] FRENCH POLISH |